Chapter 3 Culture. Outline 3 Ways to Measure Culture Cultural Differences in 4 Components of Emotion...
-
Author
lisa-ellis -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Chapter 3 Culture. Outline 3 Ways to Measure Culture Cultural Differences in 4 Components of Emotion...

Chapter 3 Culture

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 2
Outline
• 3 Ways to Measure Culture
• Cultural Differences in 4 Components of Emotion• Subjective Feelings
• Behavior (facial expressions, vocalizations)
• Eliciting Events
• Cognitive Appraisals (morality, causality, novelty)
• Physiology
• Gender and Cultural Differences
• Video: Culture and Emotion

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 3
In-Class Exercise #2
• Name, username, date
• Number paper from 1 to 2

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 4
(Masuda et al., 2005)
1Low Sadness
5High Sadness
1Low
Happiness
5High
Happiness
Central Figure:How Positive? How Negative?

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 5
(Masuda et al., 2005)
#1

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 6
#2
(Masuda et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 7
Culture
• “A group-specific practice that emerged from the interaction between a group and its environment.”
• Social Constructivist – cultural differences exist!
• Basic Emotions – no cultural differences!
• Snow Monkey (Japanese Macaque)(Schirmer, 2015, p.357)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 8
3 Ways to Measure Culture
• Individualism/Collectivism (Markus & Kitayama, 1991)
• Power Distance (Matsumoto, 1996)
• Linear vs. Dialectical Epistemology

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 9
I often do "my own thing"
The well-being of my coworkers is important to me.
One should live one's life independently of others.
If a coworker gets a prize, I would feel proud.
I like my privacy.
If a relative were in financial difficulty, I would help within
my means.
I prefer to be direct and forthright when discussing with
people. Red = Individualistic; Black = Collectivist
1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 10
I often do "my own thing"
The well-being of my coworkers is important to me.
One should live one's life independently of others.
If a coworker gets a prize, I would feel proud.
I like my privacy.
If a relative were in financial difficulty, I would help within
my means.
I prefer to be direct and forthright when discussing with
people. Red = Individualistic; Black = Collectivist

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 11
Individualism/Collectivism (Markus & Kitayama, 1991)
Collectivism
Individualism
“Individual Uniqueness”Equality
“Interdependence”Hierarchy; Status

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 12
Individualism/Collectivism (Markus & Kitayama, 1991)
Collectivism
Individualism
“Individual Uniqueness”“Interdependence”
China, Japan
America, Western Europe
Japanese American, Chinese
American

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 13
SELF
MOTHER
FATHER
BROTHER
FRIEND
SISTER
ROMANTIC PARTNER

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 14
SELFMOTHER FATHER
BROTHERFRIEND
SISTER
ROMANTIC PARTNER

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 15
Power Distance(Matsumoto, 1996)
Vertical Society
Horizontal Society
High social hierarchy
Low social hierarchy

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 16
Power Distance(Matsumoto, 1996)
Vertical Society
Horizontal Society
High social hierarchy
Low social hierarchy
AmericaJapanPhilippinesGuatemalaMalaysia
AustriaIsrael
Denmark
United Kingdom
High PD Low PD

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 17
Linear vs. Dialectical Epistemology
• Linear Epistemology:• Aristotle
• Goal = Happiness; optimize positive feelings
• Dialectical Epistemology:• Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism
• Goal = Moderation; balance b/w positive and negative feelings

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 18
Religious Basis for Dialecticism
• Daoism = “happiness is unhappiness”
• Buddhism = pursuing happiness/rewards interferes with individual’s ability to resist desire
• Confucianism = pursuit of happiness disrupts group harmony because it makes other in-group members jealous

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 19
Happiness for winning an
award
Quickly turns to
Shame for making other
group members feel
bad

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 20
Emotions and Language

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 21
• Think about a time when you felt joyful because of someone else’s misery.
• What would you label this emotion?

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 22
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: Looking to language for
cultural differences in emotion
• We only have experiences and thoughts that are represented by our words.
• We experience only the emotions for which we have words in a language
• Implications
(Sapir, 1921; Whorf, 1956)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 23
Evidence Against Sapir-Whorf
• Does the underlying structure (i.e., valence, activation) of emotions differ across culture?
• Sample 1: Estonia, Greek, Polish Ps rated similarity of pairs of emotions
• Sample 2: Chinese living in Canada and Hong Kong; Greek
• Emotions mapped onto circumplex model
• Cross-cultural similarity of emotional experience

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 24
Cultural Differences in Emotion Components

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 25
Cultural Differences in Emotion Components
• Subjective Feelings
• Behavior – Facial Expressions, Vocalizations
• Eliciting Events
• Cognitive Appraisals
• Physiological Responses

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 26
Subjective Feelings
• Socially Disengaged Emotions: Ego-Focused Emotions• Anger, Pride
• Socially Engaged Emotions: Other-Focused Emotions• Guilt, Friendliness, Shame
• Diary Study: Japanese vs. American university students• Engaging = Guilt, Friendliness; Disengaging = Anger, Pride
(Kitayama et al., 2004)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 27
Engaging Disengaging2
3
4
Positive situtaion
JapaneseAmericans
Positive Emotions
Sel
f-re
port
ed i
n-
ten
sity
of
exper
i-en
ce
(Kitayama et al., 2004)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 28
Engaging Disengaging2
3
4
Positive situtaion
JapaneseAmericans
Positive Emotions
Sel
f-re
port
ed i
n-
ten
sity
of
exper
i-en
ce
(Kitayama et al., 2004)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 29
Engaging Disengaging2
3
4
Positive situtaion
JapaneseAmericans
Positive Emotions
Sel
f-re
port
ed i
n-
ten
sity
of
exper
i-en
ce
(Kitayama et al., 2004)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 30
Engaging Disengaging2
3
4
Positive situtaion
JapaneseAmericans
Positive Emotions
Sel
f-re
port
ed i
n-
ten
sity
of
exper
i-en
ce
Engaging Disengaging2
3
4
Negative situation
JapaneseAmericans
Negative Emotions
Sel
f-re
port
ed i
n-
ten
sity
of
exper
i-en
ce
(Kitayama et al., 2004)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 31
Subjective Feelings
• Dialectical cultures more likely to experience mixed emotions
• Evidence:
• East Asia > Asian-Americans > Americans
(Scollon et al., 2004; Perunovic et al., 2007; Shiota et al., 2010)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 32
Facial Expressions
• IV = Japanese vs. American Participants
• IV = 1) Central figure expression matches crowd or 2) Central figure expression does not match crowd
• DV = Participants perceived intensity of emotion felt by central figure
(Masuda et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 33
Cultural Differences: Interpreting Emotional Expressions
(Masuda et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 34
Cultural Differences: Interpreting Emotional Expressions
(Masuda et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 35
I often do "my own thing"
The well-being of my coworkers is important to me.
One should live one's life independently of others.
If a coworker gets a prize, I would feel proud.
I like my privacy.
If a relative were in financial difficulty, I would help within
my means.
I prefer to be direct and forthright when discussing with
people. Red = Individualistic; Black = Collectivist

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 36
Japanese Americans1
3
5
7
9
Sad-Sad Sad-Happy
Deg
ree
of
sadn
ess
1=
low
; 10 =
hig
hCultural Differences: Interpreting
Emotional Expressions

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 37
Japanese Americans1
3
5
7
9
Sad-Sad Sad-Happy
Deg
ree
of
sadn
ess
1=
low
; 10 =
hig
hCultural Differences: Interpreting
Emotional Expressions
Japa
nese
Amer
ican
s1
7
Happy-HappyHappy-Sad
Deg
ree
of
happi-
nes
s1 =
low
; 5 =
hig
h

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 38
Cultural Differences: Interpreting Emotional Expressions
(Masuda et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 39
Cultural Differences: Interpreting Emotional Expressions
• Eye Gaze Patterns: Caucasian vs. Asians
• Surprise, Fear, Disgust, Anger
• Face Areas: Left eye, right eye, bridge of nose, center of face, mouth
(Jack et al., 2009)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 40
(SR = Same Race; OR = Other Race; Jack et al., 2009)
WC = Western Cultures
EA = East Asian Cultures
Left eye, right eye, bridge of nose, center of face, mouth

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 41
(Jack et al., 2009)
Greatest Focus, Smallest Focus

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 42
Cultural Differences in Display Rules (expressions)
• Japanese (vs. Americans)
• More likely to mask negative feelings in front of other people.
• More appropriate to express anger to out-groups
• Americans (vs. Japanese):
• More appropriate to express disgust and sadness to in-group and happiness to public
• :(Ekman, 1972; Friesen, 1972; Matsumoto, 1990)

43
Vocalizations
• European English and Himba tribe in Namibia
• Listened to emotional story, then selected 1 of 2 vocalizations that matched the emotion in story
• Basic Emotions: English and Himba selected correct vocalizations • Did not vary with voice – whether English or
Himba
• More difficulty with positive emotions© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
[Sauter, D.A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S.K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition ofbasic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 107, 2408-2412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908239106]

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 44

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 45
Physiology

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 46
Eliciting Event
• Same Event → Different Emotions• Navajo Indians vs. Americans
• Different Events → Same Emotion • Utko Eskimos vs. Americans

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 47
Antecedents and Cognitive Appraisals
• Individualist → Appraisal of the self
• Collectivist → Appraisal of the group OR the self
• Example: Shame, guilt, pride

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 48
Cultural Differences in Appraisals: Three Examples
• Appraisals determine type and strength of emotion elicited
• Novelty: Is the event familiar or unfamiliar (novel)?
• Causality: Did I cause this emotion? Someone else? Situation?
• Morality: Is the event moral or immoral?

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 49
Novelty
• Are we more likely to show fear to in-group (familiar) or out-group (novel) members?
• Is our fear toward in-group (familiar) or out-group (novel) members more likely to persist?

BLACK PARTICIPANTS – FEAR ACQUISITION
OUT-GROUP CONDITIONING
IN-GROUP CONDITIONING

CS
BLACK PARTICIPANTS – FEAR ACQUISITION
OUT-GROUP CONDITIONING
IN-GROUP CONDITIONING
↑ SCR UCS CR

CS
BLACK PARTICIPANTS – FEAR ACQUISITION
CS
OUT-GROUP CONDITIONING
IN-GROUP CONDITIONING
↑ SCR UCS
UCS
↑ SCR
CR
CR

WHITE PARTICIPANTS – FEAR ACQUISITION
IN-GROUP CONDITIONING
OUT-GROUP CONDITIONING

CS
WHITE PARTICIPANTS – FEAR ACQUISITION
IN-GROUP CONDITIONING
OUT-GROUP CONDITIONING
↑ SCR UCS CR

CS
WHITE PARTICIPANTS – FEAR ACQUISITION
CS
IN-GROUP CONDITIONING
OUT-GROUP CONDITIONING
↑ SCR UCS
UCS
↑ SCR
CR
CR

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 56
WHITE Ps’SHOWED MORE
FEAR (↑ SCR) TO BLACK VS. WHITE FACES
(Olsson et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 57
WHITE Ps’SHOWED MORE
FEAR (↑ SCR) TO BLACK VS. WHITE FACES
SHOWED EXTINCTION
(NO SCR) TO WHITE FACES, BUT NOT
BLACK FACES
(Olsson et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 58
BLACK Ps’SHOWED MORE
FEAR (↑ SCR) TO WHITE VS. BLACK FACES
(Olsson et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 59
BLACK Ps’SHOWED MORE
FEAR (↑ SCR) TO WHITE VS. BLACK FACES
SHOWED EXTINCTION
(NO SCR) TO BLACK FACES, BUT NOT
WHITE FACES
(Olsson et al., 2005)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 60
Novelty
• People acquire more fear (↑ SCR) in response to out-group members (vs. in-group members)
• Fear slower to extinguish (↑ SCR) in response to out-group members (vs. in-group members)
• We are more likely to experience negative emotions toward people from other cultures

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 61
CULTURAL DIFFERENCES: CAUSALITY
• Who caused our emotions? (self or other)?
• Germany vs. Tonga
• Independent vs. Collectivist
• Germany – More Anger, Less Guilt, Less Shame
• Tonga – Less Anger, More Guilt, More Shame
(Bender et al., 2012)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 62
CULTURAL DIFFERENCES: Morality• Is this behavior morally appropriate?
• Compared to other cultures, African cultures view negative emotions as due to more immoral events.
• Compared to other cultures, Latin American cultures view negative emotions as due to more moral events.

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 63
(Scherer, 1997)

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 64
Do cultural differences exist in the way appraisals → specific emotions?
• Pleasantness, novelty (expectedness), goal conduciveness/obstruction
No Cultural Differenc
es• Control of event,
responsibility, anticipated effort, morality
Cultural Differenc
es

65
Gender and Emotions
• Women = more sadness, fear, shame, guilt, positive emotions
• Men = more anger
• Biological/universal or gender roles/culture?
© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
[Fischer, A., Mosquera, P.M.R, van Vianen, A.E.M., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004). Gender and cultural differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87-94. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87]

66
Gender and Emotions
• Men and women in 37 countries
• Predictor: Gender Empowerment Measure
• Outcome: Intensity, expression• Powerful emotions: anger, disgust
• Powerless emotions: fear, sadness, shame, guilt
© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
[Fischer, A., Mosquera, P.M.R, van Vianen, A.E.M., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004). Gender and cultural differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87-94. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87]

67
Gender and Emotion Intensity
• Powerful emotions: no gender differences
• Powerless emotions• Women rated as more intense than men
• Women’s ratings did not depend on GEM
• Men’s ratings varied with GEM – more intense for Low GEM countries
© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
[Fischer, A., Mosquera, P.M.R, van Vianen, A.E.M., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004). Gender and cultural differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87-94. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87]

68
Gender and Behavior Changes
• Antagonism• Men reported more antagonism than men
• Women’s antagonism varied with GEM
• Low GEM: women reported less antagonism
• High GEM= no gender differences
• Crying• Women reported more crying than men
© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
[Fischer, A., Mosquera, P.M.R, van Vianen, A.E.M., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004). Gender and cultural differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87-94. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87]

69
Eliciting Events of Anger
• Target of Romantic Partners – High-GEM women
• Reasons for Anger• Problems/conflicts in RR – High GEM women
• Attack on status – High GEM men and women
© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
[Fischer, A., Mosquera, P.M.R, van Vianen, A.E.M., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004). Gender and cultural differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87-94. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87]

70
Gender Differences: Cultural or Universal?
• Universal for intensity of powerful emotions and crying
• Both!
• Greater gender inequality• For men, leads to more restrictive emotionality (less
intense powerless emotions)
• But, does not lead men to adopt the female role (more intense powerless emotions)
• For women, leads to more expressions of antagonism (more powerful emotions) and adoption of male role
© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
[Fischer, A., Mosquera, P.M.R, van Vianen, A.E.M., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004). Gender and cultural differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87-94. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87]

© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood 71
Summary
• Cultural Differences exist in the 4 Components of Emotions
• Self-reported experience (emotions felt, emotional intensity, mixed emotions)
• Appraisals and Antecedent Events (morality, causality, novelty)
• Behavior (expressions)
• Body (brain, physiology)
• Evolution and Social Constructivist may both be right
• Automatic vs. Controlled Appraisals