USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
-
Upload
japanairraids -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
0
Transcript of USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 1/19
THE UNITED STATES
STRATEGIC BOMBING SURVEY
THE REDUCTION OF TRUK
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 2/19
· THE UNITED STATES
STRATEGIC BOMBING SURVEY
THE REDUCTION OF TRUK
NAVAL ANALYSIS DIVISION
FEBRUARY 1947
F o r : 5 !I ! c b , 1 ), e S!lp~l;'i!lc,endll',[uQ(Doi;ume.rLu;t U~S~GO! ~fnm!1U Pri . cu: i l : l l l Offi~
W l i I . .! i h i ,p , 0 1 : 1 2 ,! D . C . P ric e 3 0 c en t! :
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 3/19
This report was written primarily £01' the 1I e of the U. S. Strategic Bomb-ing ux 'veyin ths preparation "O f further reports of a more comprehensivenatUre. Any conclusions or opinions expressed in this report must be eon-sidered a l imited to the speci fic mater ial covered and as subject to fur therin erpretation in the l igh of fur ther tudi - conducted by the 'm·vey.
FOREWORD
The 1 . . : uited tntes Stl"l ltegic Bombina Surveywu estublished by the Secretary of Wil l' on 3 No-vember 1944,purSlltlut to a directive from the lutePresident Roo sevelt. Its mission was to conduct
an impartial and expert stu ely of the effec t of 0111'
aerial attack Oil Germa uy, to be used in connectionwith air attacks onJapan and to establ ish a basi sfor evaluating the rmportance and pot ntialit iesof nil 'power as an Instrument of military trntegy
for planning the future development of the UnitedStates armed forces and lOI determining futureeconomic policies with respect to the national de-
fen e. .A snmmary report Ilmdsome 200 support-in" reports containing the findings of the Surveyin Germany have bean published.
On 15August
19 5,Pl 'esident' Truman re-quested that t tle Survey conduct IIsimilar- study
of the eff ects of all types of air attack in the waragainst Japan, submi ting reports ill duplicate
to the Secretary of War and to the Secretary of
the Navy. The officers of the Surv y during its
,J!tpaue.e phas wen):
Franklin D'Olier, Chairman,
Panl H. Nitze,
Fleury C. Alexander,
Vice Chairrneu.
ILUTY L. Bowman.
J. Kenneth Galbraith,
Rensis Likert,
Frank A. McNamee, Jr. ,
Fred earls J,'.,:Mollroe E. Spaght,
D,·. Lewis R. Thompson
Theodoi- P. 'Wright,Directors,
Walter Wilds. Secretary.
The Survey's complement provided for 300civilians, 350 officer, and 500 enlisted men. 'fhemilitary segment of the onranlxntion was drawnfrom the Army to the extent of 60 percent endfrom the Navy to jhe extent of 40 percent. Boththe Army and the , ;Tavy gnve the l lrvey all pos-
sibl assistance in furnishing men, suppli trans-
port, and information. The urv y operut d
from headquarter establi hed in Tokyo early ineptember 11)45,with ubheadquartars illNagoya,Osaka, Hiroshima and Nagasaki and with mobile
teams operating in other parts of Japnn, theislands of the Pacific, and the A intic mainland.Itwns possible to reconstruct much of wartime
Japanese military planuing and execution, n-
gagement by ngageme.nt and campaign by earn-
paign, and to secure reasonably ac urate statist icsOil Jnpan's economy and war production, plant by
plant, and industry by industry. In addition,studi were conducted on Japan's over-all stra-
t gic plans nnd the background of her ntry intotbe war , tha internal diseu ion und negotiationsIeading to her acceptance of un ondit ionnl sur-
render, t .h COUJ'se of health :1 . nd moral e amorur theei\ 'i lh~. population, the effectiveness of the Jap-anese civilian defense orgnnizatiun, and the elIl'Ctsof the atomic bombs, Separate repor ts wil! beissued covering each phase of the tudy,
The urvey iuterrogated more than 700 JIlP-anese military government, [mel industrial om-
cials, Italso recovered and tranalated muny docu-ments which not only have b n useful to the ur-
vey, but also will furni h data va luable for otherstudie s. Arrangements have b en made 0 turn01 r th Survey's files to the Central Inte.lligellceGroup, through which they will be.uvnilabla forfurther exarnination and distribution.
III
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 4/19
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PUt
I. INTaODUC'I'ION "" __ " " ""_ _ __ _____ _ 1
II. RlSTOltY, STRATECW IMPORTANCE ANP D);JVELOPMEN'I' OF TRUX
PJ!UOIl TO TlU l FmST ALLU)]) A~ACK___ _____________ ____ 2
III. A'LLIE]) CA!oIPAlGN ACMNsT TRUX • .. "_ _________________ 11
IV. PllYBICAJ" DAMAGE AND AREA STU])Y," " _" • " __ 17
vv
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 5/19
1. INTRODUCTION
III ordur to Ilmlre I< com preheusi ve report 011 the
reduc tion of ' f1 '111 , it wus necessary to a em-
hle infOl' Il 'Hl tiol l on (1) the hi l:ol"Y and mseitu-
rions of 'I'ruk, (2) the mission and planned em-
ployment of the military facilities and armed
forces based there lJ) the part of this base actu-
lilly playe I in carrying out the Imperial General
' tu ffs over-a ll s t, l'Utegy (4) All ied and Japf l,ne~e
reports and infomiutinn of attack und defen ~
measure , ami (5) P. tudy of th island installa-
tiOI1S-)lOt only to record bomb damage, bu also
to catalog the installations on 'I'ruk and to assess
the il ' valne to the Japanese war el l' or t,
This information w a s o bt a in e d by an a.xaminn-
I
on of Japanese records,by
(waln;)ting writtenI'~[ )l ie s to speci fi c que , t ions asked of importun t
Jnp:me~e Army, N,wy, and civil govemment offi-
cials , and by the findinzs of a Survey team whi ·h
personally toured Truk's hrgel' j lands and tnd-
lad the h i tory and. condi tion of Jnpauese n irfi el rl s,
'buildings, installations, and facilities Iocated
thereon,
At ali times he Japllllese were 1110, t coopern ive
in complying with the many demands; the meager
records ramair. ing after the bombings were readily
given 1lp' th~y diligently worked nigh and duy to
prepare all written information requested; and
t il ey answered < l.veryquest ion a ked them dur ing
orul interrogations. Th y behaved in !1 . fort~u'ight
arul honest manner ut al l t imes, al though admi t-
tedly they did not have mnny records available
for reference and as u result found it difficult at
time to recall axaet dates or i ncidents, When rec-
ords were not availabl t.h y readily gave their
ow n p e rs on a l opinions. All ill n11, it is believed
that ths l'o were few .if any attempts on the part
.o f 111lY high Japanese ofl ie in ls de libe l'nle] y to rle-
ceive question I~ or to witholt l infor rnation.
This report consists of two major pal s :
(1) J . . \ . narrative covering tbehistory, strategic
importance, and d valopment of Truk prior to III
F bruarv 1944 an account of Allied operations
',,jfecl"ing ], reduction of 'I'ruk, und the urv ...yof
~l l ·e.n .da . tT Inge .
(2) Enclosure, annexes elc .. which conbn i n
the sour 'e mat rial £01' til primary narrative.
Contain d also iJl thi s se . t. ion a re numerous inter -
estinrr details on other combat action lind milch
information rega,r,(ling general strategy of the
Imperial General ta If obtained durinc I ;he many
interrogation and discu aons with the seniorJapanese Army and :fa,'), officers, Till informn-
tion is not incorporated in the narrative because
of its negative value as regardsth reduction ')£
Truk, but it is, ubmitted under sepnrutecovar ns "
supplementary repor t.
Early history of Truk i almost entirely lackine
because th r eems to have been little prewar
activity ut this supposed stronghold. and no in-
formed ,individuals remain' whose knowledg« ex-
tends back to thnt period, El'lm the history of
the early duy of til WIll" is vague and wa ob-
tained in a I IJJ :gemeasure fr om the hea rs ay knowl-
edge of the JU'punese statioued Oi l Truk ut the
war's end, The story ,I In -e ented in thi s r eport
represents the most accurnt IlI'niJnhle account of
the subject and is sub tuntin lly COITect .
Truk's Ill; ion, while conceded to be 1\ rlefenaive
one is too intimately a sociat ed with the chauzine
fortunes of th orgnniaat ious wlrich O}> I 'l l (1 Itt
01' from Truk to permit the expre ion of a hard
and fast opinion 011 the ubject,
1
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 6/19
11, HISTORY, STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUK PRIOR TOTHE FOOT AllIED ATTACK
General Descripuou and History
TI'uk, known as the Jupunese Pen rl Harbor,
came under Japanese conrrcl in lOl .J" shortly n [tel'
World War I begun. Aftel' the J~pnllru;e Nll"Y
seized I).U of the C~lItrnl Pac ii e i slunds exeep i
Guam, Jnpnn insiste(l, ut the Vel'" '' i l les Confer-enee · O J f 192'2, that !l\(\Sl! islands be bel' right f\1I1'O>"
sessi ens ns 'ifas agreed in a S!'C ret t reo ty \ \ 1 ' thF I' Dn cc a nd . Englnnd, H ow lw er . J np an 'HIS 00111-
palled to accept rhe islunds under a mnndnte
I'ather than us an outright. possession. Tnder
terms of the !IlnndntJ l. Jnp"l l was r equi red to IC-'
part !'Ilgul:trl,r- to t .beLenglle Df X .. nons concern-
illg thei re i s lands and to l't'fl'U in f roru fal 't i" fying
them, Fo!' OJ . t ime Japenobse rved tbese re su-ic-
t ions and e"lll lnpon withdrawing from the League
apparently made no nttampt to fortily Truk al-
fhough at the same l ime she mnde everv effort to
develop ,1large Na"y which would use Tl. 'uk ns its
advanced base.
At t he o rr tb re n k of h o sr il jt ie s, n n \ " 11 1m a n esti-
mated 'I'ruk to be th e sh'ongest ]1;1\ '111base il l t ll e
Paci fi c wi th the !.:xcaption of Pearl Harbor, H
this is true, natural defense~ and not rnan-madeiortifieatiolLS made it so, The T1'1Ik grou p is a
cluster of U~ i sl an ds l yi Jl :; ! within" lagoon up-
proximntely 40 miles in diameter. This lagoon
is formed by a coral red roughly 140 mill'S in cir-
curnference, Encom passed by t hi s reef is 011e of
tha best natural :mr:hQ!"gesin tbe world.
Actna lly, man-made fort ifi cat ions could have
improved Little on the work of natll~e. TheJ'e is
no need for conorete for tiIiet lt iolls where alre:"dy
s to l le c l if fs ri~elnmdr ... ls of foot inl.o ll'e n;r: tJ..ie!:'"
is no llB<ld for n ~a wnll wilen Il "oral reef. with
only l ive n a v -igable p l l S 5 e S , will serve the ' same
purpose, especially \~nel11'igh islands guard eachof the pas ses, When tbe reef does brl.'nk the
sudnce to fo tn! s .m n 1 1 i s II In d s i ts l 1l !f l p o l 'U ; n l' e 15
feet high along the 0 IItel' edge. an d po It11(1ng
swell~ would dl'h,c inl '" ,l ir ll!: nssnnlt bottls to de.
s tt u ct i OD ug a. i Jl s t is 1."11if~·li1;:e C(} l-U I. rill;-i rle the
lagoon Truk's perfect "alllnI anchorage could
nccommodute tlle ellt ire ,J"rail""" Jile"t, nlthOlwh
even SlI llIU-boat nuvigutioD. without accurate ~d
complete ch"rts, is hn7.llnlolt.s bel:au.!'e of eorul
beels, Thus, it mny be seen that wit.hout uny im.
2
provement, whether to the nu t tJ rn l defenses or, to
the nuehomgc, Tmk was un e x c el l e nt find formid-
uble naval bose,
Naval Importance
AlthollgI , ' I' rnk was potentiullj ' one of [he grel1t·
e st naval buses in t Il e Paci fi e, All ied ava lunt ionInl'gt'ly overmted its strength and hcili ties. Vice
Admiml Harn, the last commllmler in chiot of tho
Fourth Fleet. staled thHt Japun's policy was to
put its limi led budget into a Inrge mobile Ileet, 1I11l1
Dot into defensil'e instullafions. To build Truk
into a fi rst -clns s nnrn l bnso wot lld have involved
/-''''CI't eX}lllnSe in ti le construction of piers , a r}'docks , power p lu u ts , r "p ll .i r shops of sui ta hIe size,and alm'l1ge space for the mau. )' requ irements of"
lnrge, modern (teet, Ordy to a Jim i ted degree was
this accomplished and, Sll rprising1y enongh, it
was not unt il long' after the wur sta rted that' I' ruk's peak of development was reached.
The Four th F lee t WIIS ol'gnnizccl on 15 Novein-
be r 19S!), and was chmgsd with the mission ofpl-01e<<ting the manda ted ,~In :l lds a rea , To do thi s
" f leet .base was necessary nnd 'I'ruk, located i ll the
center of the mandated uren W Id contair ring its ex-
rellent.nll.tllt'lll [m(o]lol'llge,was the logical location
for Fourth Fle,- t l ieudquur ters , Und<ll' command
of the Fuurth Fleet W!lS the Fourth Bnsa Foree'tlt Truk, controll LU g naval gnl 'l 'isous and instnlln-
t ions in a11 the Caro line Is lands, the Fi ft .11 Base
Furce. "t Slli pun con tro ll ing t il l the j\,{n:t'imllls Is.
l auds, and the Si xt h Base Force at Kwaj nl eill con.
troll i ng the 71·ial'slm Il s, Af t.n ' the Gilbe rt Islands
we!'c oC()t!pie<lby tJw Jnp91!eSe ( lnl' ly ill 1942 the
Third SpecinI Buse Foree, under tIll, Foul'll. Fleet,
wus set "I' at TurnWIl and "lSI) gflrrillOllcti -Wnke.
Naul'u, aJld OePIlH Islmu:k -A.ft!!], tIn" FOOllth Fleet W[IE orglUli~ed at Trll.k;
thc Hn l ', ., l c o n" tnm tiol1 dlll'nrtm,mt commellcl)d
Imilding with plans fOl 'a sealJInll(l base und beili.
li~s til rel'l~l1i~h n rlppt at a.nC]lOl', Th~\'e \Vel'llonly
'1,000 lliell III the construction depllttmen t I tt the
be,!!:iJning of i l s ope rn t ions , bl lt u t I he outbre ll l,
<IfIhe Will" tbe fm'Cc.was i.ncreased to 10,000, This
departmellt handled all of the !>cmst: l ' l Ic tiol l ot
fortificutions, bllildings, lind engin!lllring facilitiesfor the Na"y,
The fnei li ti (lS of the llIL1'n.1 base were very Iim-
ited up to Lbe bBgim:ring o-f the Will', As fur !IS
eau be determined, Truk WM only an anchorage
ill which the .fiellt could obtain limited replenish-
ment. The supply deparunent was not in opera-
tion unril December 11)40, and did not reach its
peak until th@ l ntter purt of 1943. Since there
wet 'l l no piel's which would accommodat e hn-ge
ships, nor enough cranes to handle stores in quan-t ity, goods were slll,lttled between ship nnd shoreill manual ly loaded sumpuns and barges. Fueling
pi'esented t.hs same problem. Although thet.·e
were about GC.l'lindl'lcal fuel stomge tanks total-ing roughly 49,000 tons cnpacity on Dublon Is-
lund, there was only 0. single pier equipped "for
loading t he bel barges which serviced tile ships at
anchor, Before the f irst Uni ted S tdtes carrierstrike 0)1 ' l'ruk in February 19M, there was a tot.'],l
of about 50 sampllJlS, ten 15·ton tugs, t hree BOO-
ton tugs, one 600· to .n tug , 3 water lighters, 3 fuelbarges of 500"( :.0n eapnci ty Q) less and abo II 17
small yard craft, At this period 'I'ruk had
reached i .t s peak of ubi lity to service a full grown
f l ee t ,
The Jnllam,se never llittl intended t o use TrukItSa major repair base for the [teet, since the cos t
ofdl'ydock 'facilities and heruvy repair instn 1Ia-
tions would have been too grea t for J"'Pan '. s Iim -i ted budget. This was especially true because theshallow t'oof surroundingeach island ill the atollcreated all expensive engineering problem ill theeonsn-uction of adequate piers and docks. In the
ear ly d:J .Y5of the wu I·, mpair CII ,P aci t y was t- w 0
destroyers und abe II fh'e subch ns er type ves se ls
Qt!l.lly one time, Repair work was augmentedby
r epni r sh il ls and te:nc1!1rs stnt ioned in tbe hm'bor,
but they never were ablo to handle !T In jor c1a .moge,
Repai rs beyoml T l'uk 's cnpnbilities Wel'e sent toyards in the home isl ll llds ,
At . the heigh t of i ts act i" ity ther e were .70 l 'epa il -
. 1 1 O p S ill oPlll'rution en Tl. 'l lk, with attendant fa·cili·
ties sllch liS small rnnri .t le rail ways UI) to 35 tons;
one 2,500-ton floating dl'ydock whiClh was im-
p O , l ." t ed f , - o - m Japnll il l 1941; 0 1,000 -kw, ger,erQ-
tOI'; a l'6pnll' ship with Cl'1tilej amI a gener ator
ship which aI'l'ivec1 ill Trull: in 1943. Only 1,000
pel'Sonll el were omployed in the r~pfiil' Ylll-ds.
Though llllllletOu8 cliscrepa.ncies ha ve been 101md
i n the coml,i1ation of duhl on t1,e tepn i..u.cilities,
it can b~ Blll'mised tlmt a lo. l'gc - fleet nt "Ill' wOlllcl
find 'l'ruk lacking in the necessary facilities to
keep thut fleet operating at full streagth,
Naval Defense
Unt il the end 011940 t l. 1e re were no actual forti-
f ications at. 'I'ruk, In November 1940 a dafsnse
unit o·f 850 men, under command of the Fourth
Fleet,. was astublished to man the fell' guns then
being installed, Among the ikst guns ins ta .l led on
Truk were five or six 1895 Sino-Japanese 5·1nehto G·inch guns, which were Iocated for coast . de -
fanse on the i slande of 'Pol, Moen,a.nd Uman.There were four twin-mount, dual purpose, anti-
aircraft 12,7-cm, ship guns mounted o n Dublonand Eten. Eleven S·cm, surfaes guns were placedar ound the reef islands near ti le ohannelentrences.
These, with two B·em, nntial1'Crnit and 'various
25·mm, and 13-mrn, machine guns on Fafan and
Ete.llcom p rised the defensive fortifications of
Truk before the WILl', and although construction
of these gun emplacements was started in 1940
i~ is doubtful if 1m)' were ready for use before the
end of 19U, When Rabaul was taken by theJapanese, the guns then nt 'I'ruk were moved to
Rabaul, but these were Inter replnced! by gun£intended for Rabnnl,
In November 1941, six naval patrol craft ar-
rived and were attached to the defense unit, Dur-
ing 1942, mine layers and mine sweepers came in,aut! in April of that year the personnel of the
defense force WIlS increased to 1,460 men.
In prepara tion for an expec ted A.l li e.d invasion
the army moved into Truk fo r t il e fi rst t ime in Jan-
uary 1941, It iminediataly started the construe-
lion of pillboxes and beach defeuses, and set up
Wiles of defense and n plan to repel any lrulding
assault; however, the lIn.vy mll.lllled £lIld wain·
tained the large coas.t-def(ll'ls!I bntteries and nll.anti.
aiI'CI'Uitgnlls, At this time a In.l'ge i=re liSe in the
n \tmber of coas t de: feu&e guns was made when in·stallations WeI'e stm·te(l on 12·cw, 15,5 em, !IUd
four 20·mm bat.Lel 'ies , These WEll'll located on the'
wuin hlullrls of Tl'ltk, and dllring the spring of
that yen I' all of the red i slnl1d but te ri es wer e
moved into mor·a protected positions on the m'ain
islands, Between December 19!1:3 and the end of
Lhe Will', auti,rUl'cl'aft emp lacements. weI'll installed!
in qmlJlt il-y, Thill'll were 80 positioll5of 25-=
rn!lchine gl1l1Sand twl ITl ty 12-clll guns. Other guns
of smaller caliber wm' e b.st ul led during the same
pel'iod, but ill lesser numbers,
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 7/19
Durin g this period the nll<1>'y~statsd to prepa re
home-made be r ub L aunch e rs n n d_ installed rocket
launchers impor ted from Jn.PILIl.
Torpedo boar s wer e nnothar ~ iI~ment in the de-
femse ·of Truk, Stations wara placed on lfooL1,
Uman, Udot (not complet ed), and Tol Islunds,
The boats were slow lnnding craft with OM tor-
-pedo urtaehed to each side, In conjunction with
t l l C l S 0 Were eight s.tations for "one-mull torpedoes"which were mtended fur lim in surpri se n ight Ilt-
t ack on e ne my sh ip s, w hi ch might na.ve I\J1.chGl"Cd in
the lagoon. _
Detectorc oils nn d r ui ne s g l l. fL t xl .e , t tbe reel
pusses. (A descriPtiou of ilie one-man torpedo
. .nd i ts ope ra tion and the detec tion devices i s con-
tained in the Physical Damage and Area Study
in All!!ex I to EDclOro"lIDl. and in Inter rogation
No. 13----Anue" I E nc lo s n re . . : 1 . . ) .
Truk, as may be seen from the forego ing, actn-
ally "'lIS not strongly Iortifiad until19ibl, TIt~ sit-
uation at Trull : wa s- w e l l described by Vice A.dmi-
rnl Ha rot whom he said that he would l isten to the
Americrrn radio proclaim Truk the impregnable
bastion of the Pacific" and t hen he would becomeIIpprehensi ve thn t the ITnited Stat6!! migh t learnthe .real truth.
Naval Operations
The operations of the Jap!lIlese Fleet in and
around Tr-uk ware quite extensi va CO ns ider ing the
lack of favorabla f ac il it ies in the harbor, The
combined f l ee t operated outo! Truk from July1942 unt il Febrl ll lry 19ibl . This fieet was com-
posed ·of ships of the F ir st , S e co nd , and Thh. . : l.
F lee t s and the Sixth Subwilrin.e Fleet, and con-
tained approm atel y :I or 4 battleshi ps, 4001"l"iern,
12c.l 'uisers, and destr :oyers 'of the Second Escor tForce,
The combined f leet , undercommand of Admiral
Yamilmoto whose Jln.gsJtip was th e MWiash i , oper-a ted between Truk and Babaul , r etur ning to Jap!lll
. for drydoclring, overhaul, Dud personnel replace-
ment. InTrnk the f lee t repleni shed and rested a t
unehor. After Admiral Yamamoto was killed,
Adminl Koga took command of the combined
f leet , retaining the YIL$rJI;kj, as flagship.During the American invasion of the Gilbert
Islmuls 11 part of the combilled fleet steamed to
Kwajnlein., but fearing Americil n Cil.rder (Lir
power l' eturnedlllmost immediateJyl: o Thuk.
United St. .' ltes submarine activity betwwHI Truk
4
and the Empire bad been increasing and w.as
soriously h inde ring the f low of f uel and ~l1ppl i~
to Tl"uk. By the end of 1943, when ' I' ruk s ~Jh)'S. l.
cal d\!NelopIllWlt wus at its ' IC lI ' lO, lJle resrockiag of
s up pl ie s n "Om the Empire ha d become a s er io us
problem,
On 4 February 1944, u .- single Amer ic ILn PB4Y
(Marino) f lew high over 'I'.l'uk on 0. photographic
mission; his event W!lS recognizlld by the J!tpa-nese as It-warning not to be ignor ed . ItmotivatedAdmiral Kogu. 's doois ion to move his fleet awily
f rom the threut, of Atull ri can u ir power and int i-
dentally to <1 better source of suppl y, In the
m e an t ime, tho AmeriC!lllS had moved into the
lI.frll'Slmll Islands with II gten t car ri er st riking
foree, Truk "-IlS s tronger thall it hnd ever been,
but s ti ll thi s W:lS not enough to puotect the Japa-
nese fleet, On 10 Febru!!'ry the combined fleet
st~"'mOO:out of Truk for Palau , and f rom the re it
split up; part of it W6Ut to the Philippines, part t o
Singapore, and the M'I4r J1;h i proceeded to Yoko-
suka , J apan . A eons ider eb le number of mer chan t
sh ips wer e f orced to rema in at Truk because of [L
shorta, ,"1! of fuel and wl1t!>,r, and because of highwinds which delayed tlleir unloading. Naval ac-
t iv ity fr om Truk almos t ent ire ly cea: sed !IS of that
date, with the exception of operations by Hie Sixth
Submarine Fleet.
Tn order to comple te the p ic tu re of naval ope ra -
tiollS lip to the time of the first ail' attack on Trull:
it is necessary, at this point, to daseriba briefly
Japlll ll ls II submarine activit ies in the 'I'mk area.
Before the war Tl'uk was not a submarine billie;
in fact t i lll only submarine base in the manda ted
j sl~l ldE area was loca ted a t KwajaJ. eiu, a lthough
j ll st p rior to 16June 1944 the Seventh Submarine
Flot il la , which hod headqnarters a t Rabau l, ope r-
ated a submarine tender, the Jingei, in Truk.This tender serviced hut a. few old shol't.-rl1nga
cmft used only f01' obseevl1tion.TI·uk's subma-rine act ivity did not begin until the Sixth Sub-
marine Fleet, organized in Japan on 15M!l .y 1942
arrived at Truk on 16 ,June 1942, Tr~ w m :equipped merely to service eubmarines but not
to rep?i r. them j :wd e from tbi s only a torpedo
r ep leni shing st~t lOn and two torpedo I ld jus. ting
shops wern provided, CrelVli could l 'eLo.xnCfl l·e.~tcamp on Dubion IsID.ud between Will' patrols.
The Sixtb Flee t inai llded subma.l"iJ-les of 2000
and .3,000 tons n .nd poss ib ly a lar ger tYl le :whlch
CIlI"I'letl ubser vat lon senp1anes . Oper at ions wer e
conducted from Au.strdia to Hawaii an waters and
possibly between Hawaii Imel the west coast of thnUnited Sl; .ates,
Th.e submnr ine,sel '\ 'icing base on Du blon Island
employed 130 ' per-sons, arid handled only 22 tor-
pedoes a week. There were two adjusting 8hOl)S
fo~ torpedoes, and submarines could replenish
t o c l 1p n i :: - i~ y hom these shops wi thout unloading
IIny of their remaining torpedoes to be adjustedon s110r6, SiIlGBno submarine pens were provided
on Truk, submnrines weI'!! expected to submerge
and Jie on the bottom fo\" protection during air
attacka, Aite!' the cartier attack in Fehrul):ry
1944,although the torpedo shops were not hit,
excava.tion was st arted with the view 1:,0 plrHlhlg
t hem undel'ground, but this project. was not corn-
pleted until July 11)45. InApl'il1944 carrier at-
t ack, 40 per cent of the bui ld ings l l ..nel25 per cent of
the torpedoes wel"e destroyed,
Submarine operations wel'e greatly reduced at
' I'ruk by the fuel shortage caused by United States
submarine activity and by the destruction of tlie
supplies during carrie" strikes. and subseq ueut
haavy bomber raids, Long range patrols werestopped, and ill the spring 0']' 1944 t be Sixth Sub-
marine Fleet moved to Saipan, The Seventh
Submarine FlotilJlt moved . from Rabaul to 'I'ruk
when the o ld Sixth F lee t was l iquida ted I1t the frtll
of Saipan an d a new Sixth Fleet was organized in
.J apllJl. Thera were only ubont six ships in the
Seventh Submarine Floti lla and they carried out
observations on Uhthi unt il the fiot il l!L W!'IS dis-
solved in S~ptember 1944. The dates of these op-
erations were confused in. the minds of those
inter rogated, butone Japanese claimed that sub-
marines of the Seventh Flot il la , car ri edou t at tacks
on United States ships during the landing at Sai-
pan. This would indicate that this squadron was
moved from Rabaul to Truk very shortly Il;fterthe Sixth Fleet moved out.
Air Bases and Installations
Since Truk was a nav il l base, its air iustallntions
and facil it ies were constructed and operated by the
Japanese Navy, The history of their develop-
ment, and of the vurious organ i : !l at ions of the naval
u,il' force which opera t ed f ro.m them., is limited by
the lcs s of I' Il aords and by the nonavaUabiIi ty of in.
formed perron1l61. The entire island group h.ad
11toto. ! of tbree ILis tl 'j ps, one se!tplu:ne bose".and
OUB combined iiI'strip and seaplane ba.se. The
airstrips were Eten Field, on Eten Island; Moen
No, 1 on the northwest tip of Moen 'Island j endParnm Fieldon Pnram Island. Moen No.2,
the combined seaplane. b as e a nd l ig M .e r stri p, WIlS
located Oil tho southern end of ~loen Island, and
the main seaplane base on Dublon Island.
Work had b e en started Oil cleu,t'ing t r ees for a
lighter strip on MesagOIl, one of the outer I'eel
islands, and soma work accomplished in convert-ing the apron at Dublon seaplane base into an air-
strip, On Dublon, adjacent to the seaplane base,
was an aviation repair and supply installation
known iIS the One Hundred and Fourth Naval AirArsenal. Descriptions of these air facil it ies arecontained in Annex II to Enclosure (A) and in
Physical Damage and Area. Study Reports in An-
nex I to Enclosure (B). The latter also de-scribes
the damage sustained from bombing,
The Dublon seap lane base WIiS the ouly a ir f ac il -
ity on Truk in use befcrs the war. Const ruct ion
on this base was con tinued until the spring of 1944 .
Moen No.1, a 1,200-meter strip, was started in
November 1941 and essen tial ly completed by De-
cember 1942. The seaplane base at Moen No, 2;
was started in Novembc .\ · 1941 and fini shed inApl'i11943, and the 1,000-meter air strip WIIS built
iV the spring of 1944. The date of the initial
work on Eten Field, the principal fighter base, is
uncertain, but it was substantially completed in
December 1943_ Par am Field, p rimari ly a bomber
base, was started in Jnne 1943 and was completed
_as 0. 1,200-meter strip in Januruy 1944, .. Shortly
thereafter it was extended to 1,430 meters. Con-
s tr uc ti on o f the major faci llt ies on the One Hun-
dred and FOll rth Nava l Air A.rs el ll l>lwas begun in
JIlly 1942, and this IUUtwas operating in Novembm'
of that yeaf, Additions were mads in thefall of
1(143 and again in the summer and fall of 1944 ..
Its functions were roughly equivalent t o those ofa combined assembly and repair department and
al l a:viation supply acti-vity, and nt one time it W!LS
capable of overhauling 15 (literaft engines per
month, T Il ls organization 'VIIS originally {l.branch
of fhe Southeast Area Naval lUI' Al-senn1, the
headquarters of which ware in Rabaul until March
1944 when it wns transferred to Sfripan. Truk
becllllii/. the hendquo, l ' t llrs in August 1944" af ter the
l n s s of the Marinnas, n.nd Itt that t in1.e it came u n . -
d e l' t he (lonU'ol 0: £ the commllndBI 'm ahief, FOllrth
Fleet. The personnel strength of the One Hun-
5
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 8/19
dred and Fourth Na"n] Air .ttl'S&nllj r ose from 100
men at the st.art of the war to It peak of 1,100 in
ISiS, However, at no time wns thlll'6 more than
a. lu' l1dful of properly trained nirornIt teclmici om s
in this complement,
The Truk-Imsed nnyn! ail ' organizatiou, known
as the ERst GI l l 'OL inesNU'\'al Air Corps, hendqual'-
t<!l'S at MO\ill No, 1, was acti'l"nted in the :fill of
1944 as n reslllt of tile teorganization of NineHundred and Second Nava l Ail' Corps, which had
been established at Truk in December 19U, Var i-
ous other organizations were based, at Truk during
tbe war, These included , the Twenty-s i~th Ail '
Flotilla, which came in fl'om Babnul in Decem-
be r 1943 und moved to Palsliu in MU1'ch19M, and
the Twenty-second Ah Flotilla which was t rans-
ferred in Februa ry 1944f ro ln Tminn l ind then was
deac tivated in November 1944, Unfor tunately"
almost all records hav,e been dest.royed, and there
were no wel l-inf ormed nava l a ir f orce personnel
on Truk, at the rune the !illITeywus made, ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 0
Wlll'll. present duLing the early pP.:rt of the Will',
Consequently, the story o·f the opera tionsof these
uni t s is not avnilabla 01 the 1,982 officers and
men of the East Caro liues Navul Air Col'PS who
wel'll. oa.Truk at the end of the war, only two were
p ilot s who were pmslU)t during the f irs t cn. rri :e r
attacks, an d they were enlis ted seaplnne pilots with
lit tle accurate knowledge of landplane operations,
The bes t sing le source of informa tion on ar opera-
tions is probably R l l a r Admirol Sumikawa f 0 1 ' -
merly chief of s taff to commander in chief, Fourtb
Fleet, and prior to that time commande~ of the
Twenty-second Air Flotilla, However,.h.iE knowl-
'edge of ' I'ruk is for the most part limited to theper iod I l, ftor his arr i val inJanunry 1944,
The Mission of Truk- Based Air Power
The miss ion of the Truk .AiJ:, Force was to pro.
t ee t the Truk Nuval Base, As far lIS can be de"terminad no purely ofi!! Il l; ive f lights ever took D iE
from Truk, It is not definitely eerta in tha t tlie air-craft COilIlW'llttn.cli:ing Our carziar task force 011
tho n.ightof 113-17F ebruary ilnd the morning of
30 April 1944 took oIr from Trnk Jields, Renr
Admiral SU,mikawa stated e h v . t about six plancs
took off from Parltm Field on the night of HI F eb-
ruary to attack t he. Americlln Fleet Ilnd did -Dot
remrn, However , OfliooT'S who wel 'e s tH.tloned nt
the v lJ , r io l lS f ie ld a t tbe t ime knew not l, jJ lg .of the
a tt ack :md sugges ted tbe p(}!! sibi Ji ty thn li t came
6
from Rnbuul 01' Tiniun. N,othingcolLld be learned
regal 'ding tho utt,llck on the rnol' lu:lg of 30 April
eNcept tImt one aviati on stll1I?lliool', who "',as
newly arrived at .Tl'uk at the time of the raid,
stated thltt four attack bombers , hall tuken oJl on
the evening of 29Apri l, and about 0100 Oil the 30th
two or three more attack bombers had til-ken o:ff.
Not a ll of these planes returned, and hodid notknow what their mission had been, Late in the
war, in June 1945, an oJi'onsive operation was
p lauued but 1Ie, 'e1' carri ed out , Orders w&'e re-
ceived from Tokyo to prllpf~re Param Field for
use in l aunching suicide att acks ng)Unst Uni ted
Stales ships u .LUlithi, but the f ield wa s bombed so
continuously tbu.t it could not be used; in fact,
the Jl -j l' tIl ese wonder ed i f Unted Stutes intel li -
geuce hurl learned of the plan, and had CO!ICBn-
tmted the attoelrs on Parnm for that reason,Routine seurch miss ions were Ilewn from Truk
until June 1944, a ft er w h ic h time t here were not
sufficient nircraft uvnilable, Both Iand-bassd a ir-
cnLi t and seap lanes wer e employed in search oper-
ations, Laud-based planes concentrated lJlostly
on the a rea from !!'O"to 2nD" (this may huve been
t rue only dur ing the late SPl 'ing of 1944) ; bombers
and recommissance p l!mes sea rching to 600 mi le s
and fighters to 300 miles, At dawn each duy v .
12-plane search flight WIlS l!LU11chedfrom the sea-
plan e b ase. Six sec u t sea p lanes (Jakes) each cov-
erad (J. sector of abouj 150 miles radius with a
30"mile cross leg. These sectors were varied daily,
SL>;obse rvat icn seap lanes (Pe te s) Il ew an ant i-
submnl'iull patrol to a distance of 90 miles, All
search planes carried a light bomb load in case
of submarine contact. It was stated thll- t several
at tacks wm~ ~nl lde on 01U submacmes , hut 1\0 de-
tails could be obtained. Dlldllg the last year of
the war, SI lVB!'111 long-range reconnaissanea mis-
so ins were f lown from Tru lr, to Ulithi, Guam" and
Eniwetok,Truk was also a 'Staging point fOl' a irc ra ft f er -
ried from Japan to the South Pacific. A majority
of the p lanes WllI'll.brought to Truk by auxiliaryaircraf t carners I lnd were miloa.dlld thore to awaitt.he ud-vtJl of pilots fl 'Om ot her bases, chiefly
R~bOl:uI,wllo flew them to thell' filll.l destil~fI,tions.
Ail'CI'llft wore also flown fiom JUl)fln via Truk to
Rab[L1l1md othel' bases, Va,riolls' routes w~l'e
used ~n these f el 'l 'y f ligh ts, a lthough bombel 's and
other 10ng-r '1Ulge plnnes sometimes flew dil'ect from
TiJ1inn CIl· Sa ipun to Rabau l. ReCOl 'C lsof fe l' ;'Y
opero,i ;ions were dostroyed, and the :l'oHowillg ap-
proJ1imate figures UJ'O the re su lt of reco lleebious of
persons new I 1 . t Truk, Stat is ti cs pr im' 1 :0 December
1943 ura completely lacking,
Nu m M!f nnd l : ! r ' f I i I I '
- The entire atoll could boast about only 40 anti-
aircraft guns, and these were not equipped with
f i re- ccn t ro l rnd Itr , b e e n u se t hi s squi prnen thad bean
aboard a ship which, while enroute to Truk, wa s
sunk by one of OU_i ' submarinaa Radar coverage
was genernily gcod, although t ll!! Japanesasaidthat unsatisfactory loca tions of thea .n tennae
caused al l s ta tions excep t O)1e to be ent ire ly unre -
llabl e ill detec ting ra j ds ,n'om th 10 ~fa,riaJlllas,
whereas severa I stations could track planes up"
preaching from the Marshulla mlfective radar
ranges of as much as 150 mi les were reported to be
customary, but this figure is. believed to beex-
aggerated. In this connection an interesting
statement was made concerning the detect jon of
B--24s, by R,enr Admiral Sumilrawa w ho sa id that
B-24s evidently firm nt conside rable a lt itude, de-
scending to tho surface at a distance which they
apparently considered to be fur enough outside
enemy radar I'lllIge to allow them to complete
tbeir> approach undetected, Usually t ll ey wer e
dot-Beted prior to thair descent and conseq uent ly
the Jupaness had considerable warning of their
approach, Voice communication with fight-01's
was maintained by one of the stat ions nt Moen, but
Information suppl ied to the f ligh t l eade r consi sted
only of range and bearing of enemy uircraft,
The flight leader made his own decisions us to
action to be tnken, and fighter direction as the
&meriC(Lll Air Forces knew it apparently wns not
employed by the Japanese,
Ther e i s some doubt a s to the condi tion o tre ll .m-
ness normally maintained at 'I'ruk, One officer
stated that a flight of 4 lnnd-basad fightel'S' was
airborne at down daily, with all ndditional 20
fightersalerted for inst ant, t ake-off. Pilots who
d idnot to ke 01I promptly were l ikely to be beaten
when they returned, The seaplane unit man-
t aiued no spscinl condit ion of readiness until ai ,er
th e February 19i14 attack. From than on three
fighters were kept on inlmedinte a le rt .
Wh.en fighters were urmed with machine guns
only, they would attempt to intercept l l.ppronchin. ,.
raids (Lt some distance from t.he base, Many of
Lbe fightru' S were armed with me>: hanical time-
fuzed bombs for a ir-to- ai r bombing. , These pImesfound it neCCSS!ll.'y~o wait uutil the bomb~I'SlVel'e
making their final nppl'onchOll a steady course
before they Gou]d ml lke an a ttack wi th nriS chance
1
In mid-.J.a1t'llaI 'Y 11144two carriers unloaded about
120 planes of several types,l1l1(l ill February 1944
one canier unl oadedabout 30 J'i lls,
There i s some indication t hat squadrons from
Rabaul occasioun lly bused n;t TrW( for training
purposes, nlthough this impression may have
l'ltsult.ed only from the :factthat the Twenty-sixth
Ail' F]otilla, which was t emporarily stationed at
T ru lr in eady 1!). j_4,had no dnties thHe other than
t.,ra:inin grocti viti es, 0 ther av ia tion t ra in i ng acti v-
ities ut TJ:lJk consisted only of routine combattraining flights, familiarization i n new ,drcl'(tft,.
and minor ground school mstruetion conducted
wi th in the squadrons,
Air Defense
The ail' defense of Truk W1l.S not considered
adequate by the Japanese stationed there. At the
time of OIU' fh:st attack, 16,Febl'llary 1944 (west.
IOllgj:tude date), Rear Admiral Sumikawa was in
Tokyo a ttampting to get a ssi st auea to s treng tben
his defenses, Throughs, blunder or oversight by
h:igher hendquartars, the TWlllltyosjl>-" thAil' F lo- ,
tilla had not been made subject to orders from the
T r uk ccrnman d. This p artiom nr shortcoming cost
the JI1PIlll6Sl) dearly on the morning of Febru-
111'Y 16, The commander of the ' I'wenty-s izth All ,
Flotilln, who was the only officer ut 'I'ruk with theauthorit y to order these plnnes into thsail', \VIIS
not at the fi eld wi th h is p lanes and because of com-
DlllnlOation dif ficult ies could not get word to themto take off. Even if he hn.d beon uble to get his
order through, , 'e1 'Y f ew of t l"Ulp lanes cou ld have
taken ofl ' since h i§ ai rp lanes were r : 1 l 1 Eten Field
and most of his pilots wero on Dubloll Island.
Actua lly, the re wero t~w fighter ail'cl':.,ft available
for defense ,
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 9/19
TABLE B .-UJ-t7 F .bM14ry 1944
of lIC ess, Air-to-air bomhin ...wa con idered to
00 somewhat successful against B-24s, bnt the
B-29s f lew SO high that tho ' I'ruk fight er plUMS,
which fur the most pa rt war e o ld patched-l ip c raf t
which had been damaged in previous rai ,could
not ClUTYbomb to the a lt itude flown by the lIper-
for tresses, '1'he Japanese attempted, UUSUCCI15 •
fully to install SO-mm. gun in place of 2.Q-IlI.lll.
guns in their fighters for use against tile B-29s.Actually there w [a few attacks made on B-29s
because the Japanese were bowing what few air-
ctn.f t remained to them.
A few Irvings were nvuilab le f or use as night
fi zhtees, They were not equ ipped wth radar IIl1d
were dependent solely on non-radar-controlled
searchligh t cocper a t ion. These p lanes had a f ixed
machine gun mounted aft of the pilo set at -au
elevation of 30·. As the pilot approached the
ttu:get from below and astern, the gunner:, in the
rear: seat, fired the gun when his sighe came on
the target . Al though this method appears t o 00
extremely crude, the Japanese claimed fair success
unt il the B-24s began to e.mploy evas ive ac tion lIS
soon as they were picked up by a searchlight.Japanese es tima tes ofUni ted States p lanes sho t
down could not be obtained. If there were NC-
ords they had been de troyed, and Rear .A.dmiml
Sumikawa considered the claims of his pilots, as
well as of ours, to hnve b e en absurd and Dot worth
considering.Es timates of numbers of Japunese ai rcra ft p .r es -
entat the times of the two nited States carrier
IltblClal, numbers participat,i:ng ill ,engagements,
and numbers dl'lStl'oyed were obtained from several
sources , 1I0ne of which, unfor tl ll lotely, l ire consid-fl'od to be reliable. The figures gi ven by Rear
AdmirRl Sumikswa shown in table A, are prob-
ably the most accura te , Tl l, b16B is a compilat ion
of statements made by various ind iv idual s W]lO
had some knowledge of events when they occurred,
but W11Q {orgut the exact detai ls ILDd figures as
time passed, Table C is an ever-all estimate by
Rear Admil'lll Sumiknwa of uireraft present at
Truk during va rious periods fr om February 1944
to the end of the war. Part of it is a duplication
of informacion included in table.A.. Considerable
disparity between tables A and B is apparent, It
is obvious, too, that in many cases individual col-
umns could not be r econci led to the ir total s so that
itwas necessary to insert approximate f igures inthe totals to make the statistics agree as much as
possible.
TOfikl!l:l!
T,ILE A-J6-17 Pebruary 1944
'100
19-50 April 1944
Dublan ScoPl!u lfi n £ L ' j B ~ ~Ete n._ ~ ~_~ _ _ ~ _.~ ~.
1IIJoenNo. L_r ~•• ~ .... _ _
~:~~~:~:.::::::::::
2Zsb.<Uvln.g .
&Judy.
8
Tooko.r.r
~~t:~~~:;~:~~¥~:~!::~~T A 1 J . .1ll .-Truk's·"ir .!tengti. at ~iunifi<IJ"! 1,.riad. during can'l'aign-A. r! ; ]JoTtedbyRear Ad,, ,;, al Sum ikawa Ci nC Tw It
secotui Air FlotiUa • '" I/'"
' " F ob . 1 ,1 H< -Fd"r to r:arrJ(r !tt. ti .ck: HJ-
17Feb.
o Jud:y 12.
2.Kl.t6.JI Zei:e.
t l tvlD.; : n,
2Pf!lteU~E1lnko.
.. A/O
. Aircraft b.Wngill~ 10 7'rukc/Ju! slatirmw at oth",. baa. .
~~:::::~::::~:::~::::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~:~t~·~:~:~:~~::~~~~~~~~~~ . ~ # ¥ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:i~~~~~~~_~ .__ . .0 • • • P . ~ • ._ • ~_ 2t Jlldy 12s••• d~ ' ._
'l'otnl., otjme uas .... _. . •.. ._._ •• Zl Ale 01djO 71AIO
Army Forces 00Truk
The Ar:my 's miss ion 011 'I'ruk was purely de-
fensive, und its work would begin only o.t such
t ime as a landing actua lly WI1S uttempted by enemy
troops. It had no other l' pons ib il ity. No offen-
sive operations were launched from Truk nor
were aJ1Y planned. Truk was not even u ed as a
troop staging area, nor as u training center. Since.
no Al lied invasion was ever made it would a.ppear
I'ha t the value of Itl"llly forces at Truk WtlSnot only
negl ig ib le hut ac tnal ly l lcglLt ive, since they con-
sumed much needed upplies and in no way were
able to ju tify thei l' exi stence on Truk.
In September 1943, tha Fifty·second Divisi on
was mobilized at Kauuzawa, Japan, for duty in
the ElL tern Carotin . The fir tmajor ecb. Ion of
this divi aon nni ved. at Truk enrly i n January 19±i
and was stationed OIl Dublon , M.o 11, and Tol Is-
lands, wi th headq ua l"tCl'S on Du b lon, Prior to this
t ime ther e were no lU'rny forces on Truk other than
an advan 'e party of 300 officer and mel) of this
arne division which had arrived ill I 0\' moor
9
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 10/19
Hl!3. The Fifty· econd Division was under the
command of ilia Eas tern At'my, with headquar-
tel'S inJnpan, a nd n lso under l ll l~command o f the
combined fleet . The .exac t command del inea tion
is not ent irely c 1 e a L ' hut t l 1 1 1 i nference i s l h: )t i li a
commander of. the combined fiee ,\"ItS the immedi-
ate operational senior and the commander of the
easte rn a tJny ex-Il rc ised administrat i ve command.
Locally, neither' the filmy nor the navy eserci ed
juris diction, over the other. Coordination was
obt ained by coopemt ion . Major dec i i on s af fec t-
ing both services w re made in joint conference,In the latter part of February (after the 16-1 '1
February carrier attack} a second Jarge echelon
of 1;]10 .Fifty-second Division stnged from Ujina ,
Japan, and arrived at Truk after surviving with
ome 10 , a torp do attack en route. At this
t ime a red is tr ibut ion o f forces p la ced gnr ri son s on
Dublon, Moen, Fefnn, and Uman, with a very
small unit on Toland a few members of the con-
trol, or war ning oraanization on each .island. On
8 March 194<1 ,another de ta chmen t ar ri ved f rom
Ujina , a nd the i sl and s illthe western part of the
atoll were garris oned, At this time the scope of
the Truk command was br oadened to include ra-ponsibility for all gll lTisl)n in the Carol ines from
Ponape to Enderby. Toward the end of :llll'eh
an ant ia ir cr af t uni t r epor ted f ind was d is tJ :i bu ted
throughou t t he p reviou sly gar ri soned i sl ands and
Parum, This unit WIIS shortly thereafter trans-f er re d to the ' a; vy for cont ro l in order to keep all
ant ia ircraft defense units under Navy command.
On 1 J"l1I1ea detachment of troops fr om Mort-
l ock I sl and was spread through the smal le r 'I'mk
Islands . Anothel' detachment from MortlQCk in
November 1944, and 9. bat ta ll ion from Enderby in
J"lIDuary 19{5, completed the Truk ga re ison a it
exis ted at be end of the war,
In Angus t 1944 the Commander of the Fifty-
e eond D iv is ion, L ieut enan t Gene ra l Mug ikur i,
as sumed the title of Commander, T hi rty-firs
Army. This army, whose headqumters was on
aipan had been wiped out in the MarillIlllS CD.m-
pllign, with its commanding general killed on
Gnnm. Actua lly the new tit le made no di: fl 'e renee
to the commander of the Trukforce ince it placed
no new forces under his command, nor d id i t al te r
his duties.
At the time the army arriv din Truk, no fortif i-
cations had been built other than those which r e-
10
mained under navy contr ol. Further, there were
no barracks avnilable for nrmy use. T rol)ps were
quartered in civilian buildings (sch~ls lind
houses) in n few navy buildings, and ill a tentcamp. Con tl'udioll of field fortificntions W!lS be-gun immediately, After the cardel' trikes of 16-
17 February 11)4.1tr oops were mov d into small,
crudely constructed, partially underground houses.These were of i nfer io r qual it y s in ce no bui ld ing
mater ial s were avai la bl e except f rom scl ll lt y Ioenl
resourees. Because the navy was charged with
supplying the army wi h mnter ial s, i nclud ing n ll
types of supplis , ammunition and clothing, the
army had not brought building materials with
them. Since Japanese supply lines were severed
completely about this time they were never able
to receive supplies fr om JapllJl. Constr uction of
ai r- ra id shel te rs wa sa lso begun a t this t ime; these
cons isted of one or more large, bombardment-
p roof tunne ls on e ach i sl and, e ach c apabl e of shel -
taring a large number of men.
In August 1914" as n result of Ie ons learned
in the Mnri llDllS campa ign, t he army dec ided tomake everything bombardment proof. Troops
worked dill' and n igh t pl ac ing a ll he avy weapons,i nc luding heavy machine guns, i n caves , a nd d_ ig -
gin interconnec ting tunnels between gun posi-
tions with as many ILS .6."e a lterna te emplace-
ments con tructad for each gun. Empha si s wa s
also placed on the cons truction of tank traps lind
barriers I l 1 1 d the planting of beach mines. From
this time until the end of the Will' the troops l ived
in or near the eaves and tunnels which were also, t he ir b at tl e s ta ti ona
inee no amphibious assault ever materia lized
the a rmy' on ly ope rat ions cons is te d o f p repar ing
the defen se o f the i sl ands , a nd g rowing food which
wa s woeful ly scarce. The only no tabl e except ion
to tills was that aImy personnel manned soma of
the hea-vy machine guns which were employedagainst low-.flying'o,ircraft.
ma ll scal e t ra in ing exerci se s we re co! lduct ed
o~ly occasiona lly, since ammunit ion was not plen-tif nl, T hey had only the ammunition which they
hlld brought with them from Japan, and some o'f
tha t was destroyed by air a,ttacks.
Tb~ plan envisioned for the defens e against
. nmphiblO~ ass ault included nwnerous fact or s.
Coast artillery, emplaced on main islands and
manned and controlled by the navy, was charged
. f
with the task of .engaging" ships at.tempting to
operate close outside the atoll reef or trying to
enter any of the passuges. Naval mines lllid in
the po es !I,ll,dchunn Is , p rovided udditionnl pro-
t ec ti on, a nd nnt isubmar im, and l \n ti to rp IOdo net s
were placed, by the navy, around docks and cer-
tain nncb.oro,gll to guard agains tbe forms o'f
attnck. As landing craft nppeoacaed to within
1 ,000 to 2 ,000 meter s o f (Lny is la nd , n. rmy Ill'tille1"J '
wonld open fire but its volume was r est ricted byshortage of ummumtion, 'I'.he nn.vy 11Ml some
rockets with a rullge 1 )£ 800 meters. The indi
v idual r ee fs IV hieh surtound ea ch : i sl a nd were
p lan te d w ith about 4,000 nntiboat mines, some putt he re by i;he army and some by th e. navy, l IIO t ly to
protect the bes t landing b aches . As landlnzr craft
a ppronched the se reef s. ..-w hi ch averag d a ill tnnca
of 200 to 300 meters 0 : 1 1 shore-morta l's, machine
guns, antiboat guns, and small arms were e o open
lip with a heavy crossfire from w ll-established
positions. Tl'OOPS were to be dug ill along thebeaches of the main islands and could fall buck
to preconstructed secondary positionsui c ase o f
nece ss it y. Mll clUne guns, l igh t mobi le a rt il lery,
and 37-mm. hand-drawn antitank guns had aboutf ive alternate and supplementary positions pre-
pared , and l'e!!ulm' shifting of these zuns was
planned, A.nllU1IDit io ll shortage required sparing
use of these guns , Mos t gun .poaitions were inter-
COJJJl cted by tunnels. Barbed wire WIIS used
mos tly in a protective capa ity around the gunemplacement ; however, use of tactical wire with
Iuues fol' machine gun fire was also planned tosome extent. There were 110 tanks on 'I'ruk, nl-though the pet· onnel of a tank nuit were. there,
servi ng as infatl tty.
The plan o f defen se a cc ep ted t empo ra ry with-
drawal to reform and countercharge but thep rima ry p lan , in case of Iack of orders to the
contrary, was t o f ight f rom caves nnd reaches
with the same tac tics a were employed a Iwo
Jimll. and Okinawa. There was no plan for mov-
ing troops from island to island and Jack of water
craf t for t ran spo rt at ion wou ld have prevent ed this
ill [my case. There wer no special precautions
agains t a ir -horne l anding s s in ce . it lVIIS collsidBred
tha t t he nature of t he t er rai n. o ff ered suf fi ci en t, pro-
tection ngain this form of at ta ck .
A summary of Ilrmy trength at Tr uk follows :
End of Februnry 1944 1.541
End of Mn.reh ll.l'l4 12. 356
Elnd of April lil'JG 14,2!JS
This last f ieure is the total final number of Ill'myper sonnel on 'I'ruk, as there were no further re-
ceipts or transfers, Total army casualties from
air attacks wet' !! 234 killed and 19 wounded.
III. ALLIED CAMPAlGN AGAINST TRUK.
l
Photographic Mission
On 4 February 1944, an American PB4y
(Ml tl ;i ne ) f lew ove r Truk at a pprox imately 20,000
feet. ACCOl'diJlg to one source this airplane was
first observed v isua ll y, a nd f ir ed upon, by a ba tt le -
ship in the harbor, 0 Japan e fighter planes
WB~1l nir-borna when this photo plane was Ihstsighted but several took off in pursuit. The Jap-
anese fai le d 1 ;0 in tercept , a lt hough one f lo at pl anewas reported to have come almo t within fir ing
range, but the PBiy escaped by diving away.
The J apanes e correctly interpreted the s ignifi-
canoe o f the reconna issance p lane a s u , fo re runne r
of a ttack, as evidenced by the withdr awal, 6 days
later, of the Japanes e Fleet to Palau, and the de-
pnrture of A.dmirals Koga and umikawa to
Japan. Kogn left in his flagship, MU<Jaah i vin
Palau. For s ome undetermin (1 rea SOli t he Jat -
a ness conc luded tha t t hey should expe ct an attack
about 21 February, and the one that greeted them
in the early morning of 16 February caught til m
totally unprepared.
Carrier Attack, 16-17 February 1944
Two days before the first carri r attack one of
four Bettys failed 0 raturn to its base f rom 11
routine search fli",ht. The Japanese "feured thatenemy aircraft were responsible and to add to
the ir apprehension, the Japnne. ..<e radio . in te reept
group picked tIP voice transmi ions 'which were
identified as concerning United Stat aircraft
carr ier operations , becau e they COli a ined "color
base' 01,119. Chamcter of the transmiss ion indi-
cated that the cm-riars miaht be close by. On the
strength of these two incidents !Jle island group
wen on the alert .
Ent 'l yon the morninc o f 15 Feb l1. lIU1 ' a spe ci al
arch flight of G aircraft cover d an area 30" to
each side of north for a distancs of 300 miles. The
11
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 11/19
s earch resulted in it nl!(rntivc report, and th is ,
coupled with the I alarming result of radio
direc tion findin IT hearings on the previous calls,
made the JItpanese dec ide tha t t J 1 1 l t rnnsruissions
o ri gumt ll cl somewhe re between Kwa jnl ein and
Eniw~ ok , Wbl ll "110U 1111h a n ds r e la x e d vigilnnce,
Due to conf li ct ing repo rt s. exac t c hronology o f
the se foregoing even ts ~re not known. bl lt oc cu r-
lWOO have boon S ll ti sf ll ctodJy v r if le d. Tho lIiF brun rv dnwn-f iz ht er sweep Iuuuched f rom f ive
Americ.;n .Cll.l'ri,:U;caugh t the Japilll)Se unpre-
pared, As fur IlS can be de ermined 110 clefen lve
fighter were air-borne when the Jap nnesa first
b ecame aware of the impending at ta ck
.LUthough the attacking; onr rier plane were
, picked up by r.1nar almos a minu prior to
the ir a rr iv al ove rhead, t here appea l'S to have been
some de lay in spreading the alarm to an arens.
By querying personnel tationed at the fields it
was found that altbough Po ram had 30 minutes
notice Eten had only 10 minutes wnrl1ing and at
I 11 0e n N o.1 t he fi rs t 1 ig ht -e J"wave arrived simul-
ta.neously with the sounding of the alarm, Fur-
t he r c au se s for t he l ack o f readine ss l ie in the fucts
t :hnt I1J dar ' I l"1 lS not proper Iy manned, p il ot s were
on Dublon Island while their aircraft were on
Moen IUId :Et en I sl ands , and the t el ephone sys tem
'l'l'll not functioning properly.
According to the tac tica l-plan of a ttack, the fir t
Amer ican obj ect iv e was to attain air supremacy
over the target, to be accomplished by total de-
s truct ion of the Japanesa ai r c omponent at ' I' ruk ,
Five American carriers launched a total of 70
f ight er s at 06i iO 1hou r and 20 minu tes before sun -
rise on 16 February. Curriers and numbers of
pl anes par ti ci pat ing were: Bunk-er Hin (22),
Yorktollm (12), En terp rille (12) I n/lrepid (12),
and Ess8:/;(11). Inaddit ion, the Bunker Hill fur-n ish.ed one a ircrra ft with its f ight er s as ai r t arge t
observer.Planes of the 8 task groups nrrived in the tar-
get ar ea approximately at sunrise. nited States
med ium- and low-al ti tude pl anes we re a tt acked
iJnmediate.ly by enemy fighters, and during the
attnck more enemy planes were observed to bo
taking off . In all, it is e st ima ted tha t t he enemy
llad as mllny Ill! 80 planes air-borne dur ing the
at ta ck , Japanese repor ts concerning the number
of Japanese planes a iJ '-borne during the opera tion
vary between 25 and O.
iz
During t hi s n tt nc k 0\11' f ighters divided the ir ef -
forts between s t.r afing u iL-craft on the gr ound at
euemv fie lds and s.eaplo .nc buses, and fig1l ting the
eneml' s a ir -borne pl ane s. .Ai rcraf t on the g round
were oft 11 parked nose to t il l) outside revetments
m ilking exce ll en t t arge ts . In t .h e ui r, the enemy's
efforts lucked coordinatiou and many of their
pilots appeared to be inexperienced.
Immediately following the fighter strike atplanes on the gi'Qllnd, attacks were made on dis -
p er sal a rea s at Moen , Et~, and Puram air bases,
by 18 torpedo bombers, 6 from each task group,
loaded with fr·rtgmeutation clusters and incen-
d ia ri es . Thi s a tt ack was des igned to rende r fields
and in tulln tion un ervics able lind thus pr event
attack on our task force dnrillg the night.
A s a 1 '1 lS 1l ILo f t he se ven ts and n ditio ns th e
f ighter sweep was entu:ely succes sful. In the air,
56 enemy planes (51 of them fighters) were
c la imed to bedestroyed, and by American est imate
s tr af ing a tt acks des troyed an add it iona l 72 enemy
planes on the ground. Thls figure is the more im-pressive when it i s compa red wi th our own losse s,
in this weep, of only 4 fighters f rom all causes,1 1 . . total of 125 operational wing aircraft and 110
a ir ar senal ai rc raJ t were burned o r ser ious ly dam-
aged on the ground, The refore, o f t he 365 a ir craf t
on Truk lit the time of the raid, less than 100 reo
mained unscathed . Tbe Japane se were abl e, how-
el'er to rebuild 80 ZElkes f rom parts of the dam-
aged aircraft and bring to approximately 80 the
ultimate po t-ruid total of flyable aircrnft, The
ef f~ ti veness o f t he air arsenal WItS reduced by an
estimated 80 percent, and the Param strip was
out of commission for 20 days. The American
forces had accomplis hed their initial miss ion of
knocking out enemy ail ' opposit ion.
Sh ipping wa s the pr imary t arge t immed iat ely
after the early-morning fighter sweep was com-
pleted. Carriel' ffights were staggered to keep
a continuou flow of hips to the target. Approx].
mately 30 s eparate flights of 1 to 30 aircraft each.
inc luding torpedo planes, d ive bombers, IUIdescort
fightru were lhl'OWD at sDemy shipping during
the cngagemenc, Bomb Ioad ings var ie d through-
out he day. The usual loads were 500.pcund
hom U S, of which 498 Wel'e dropped, ol'l,OOO-pound
bombs, of which 369 were l'elensed. A few 250-,
] . (100 - and 2 ,000 -l lOUDd bombs we re d ropped,
Only 66 torpedoes were expended,
The. u ri kes agains t. shipp ing complet ely w iped
out all Japanese naval ships ill anchorag at the
time of the uttaclc, lind in addition sank 31 mer-
chnnt s hips, for n, t ot al o f approxima tely 200000
ton, Nllvn.! ahips des troyed included three lir rhtb
cruisers, Naka, Ag(l,no, and Eatori; tlll'Cll des roy-
ers YttbtlJre Oikcse, and Nagatlluhij t h seapl ane
tender, Al rJ i t su41/ i , ima, . and the submarine tender,
Heian Maru.On 1'7 Fabruury, lnck of suitubl targets made
further attacks en sllipping unprofitable. Al-
t hough ai r-bo rne opposi ti on had c ea sed the Ame r-
ican force withdrew extensive a ttacks 011 thehore
ins ta. l1 at ia ns . Damar rs t o ins ta ll at ions , r Jt hough
relatively light, included the f ollowing: d true-
t iO !l o f O I, e o r two hangar s on Moen , des truc ti on
o f three fue l- st oruge t anks 01 Dublon ~11(1others
on Eten, and the destruction of ammunition
dumps all Dublon.
During the night of 16-17 February six or
seven Kates uttaeked tbe carrier force, Only one
of thes e penetrated the radar screen and launched
J). torpedo which struck he starboard quarter of
the carrier InfJrepid. Conflicting evidence makes
it difficult to ascertain whether or not radar was
used by these attacking planes. Re;tr Admiral
Sumikawa, who" i s ac cept ed a s t Il e f ina l au thor it y
for the purpose' of this report, Insists that these
planes took off from Param field, although other
sources maintain that no aireraft, took off from
Trul l: dur ing that n ight a nd that t he nt tn .ckmg a ir -
oraft must have be n from another island ..
American losses for the raid totalled four air
craft. The consen su s o f Japane se f lying per son -
nel as t o th e reason s for t he d ispropo rt ionat e Jap-
anesa losses i s: (1). inferiority in numbers, (2)
surprise (3) the tactical disadvantage of takin ir
off in the face of astac lc iug a ircraft.
'IIVO .hundred aircraft present at Eten Field
were awaitinz either fatTy pil ts to fly them to
thei r f in al de st in at ion o r t .r an si er t o the ai r I1l"S6nU
to b readied for service. According to Rear .Ad-
rniml Sumikawa only 41 s rvicenble airplanes
were available to the Tr uk command to rep I the
at ta ck . At Truk we re 12 !J ,a ir cr af t, u sed for t a- ain-
mg pur poses and belonei ng to the Rn b n ul cOJ'!1-
maud but authorifis d to be used to defend the atoll
shonld it be attacked. Tb 200 uircl"nft at Eten
were parked nos e to tail outside the revetimlluts,
whi ch made i t possibl e f l' flam to spread from
one aircraft to the other thus accounting for the
great loss of aircraft on the gronnd. Cause of
poor rlispersal i t raceable to three fac tors: insufli .-
ci ent spa ce on the ai rf ie ld, l ac k o f fer ry pi lo ts f rom
Rabaul, an d the fact that the two auxiliary air-
craft carder captains who brought the nircraft .
foo li ng the <lelay at Trull: to be dangercn , dis-
charged the ir ' ca rgoe s haphaza rd ly and hur ri ed ly
departed.Tbe Unit d lntes timate of total damage to
e ne m y a ir cr af t d ur in g this 1"1I1dwas apparen tl y not
much in error, Howev~r, the destruo ion of air-
bor ne planes was much less than. claimed and the
on- the-ground losses were cons iderably higher.
United States e tim ate : 129 sho t down 152 de-s troye-d and damaged on the ground ..)
This well-executed, 2-day attack by the Amer-
ican currier task force left Truk practically de-
fensel ess. Supp li es had not boon put underground
and were extremely susceptible to air attack, and
radio and radar instillations al 0 were damaged
materially. The Japanese were surprised and re-
lieved when the attack ceased on the second day.
Following the trike the Japanese e.ffected such
repairs to their fields and installations as were
easily made, and began a belated but intensive
effort to place everything po iSle underground ..
Carrier Attack, 29-30 April 1944
Early on thB morning of 29 Apri11944 (west
longitude time) an American fast carrier task
force battered Truk for the second time. The
primary objective ill thi sweep was g round in-
stallations and buildings. The American planes
were picked up by r adar when still 30 minu tes out
and thi s i nt erva l p roved suf fi ci en t for t he Japanese
to l aunch a cons ide rabl e numbe r o f f igh ter s.
Five Japan planes, out on their normal
routine sBorch I1Jld patrol mission failed to con-
tact the American fleet ill time to warn the homebase, although hortly after the radar warning
Wll received one of them attempted to make radio
contact. Communication with this plane was lost
before the report was received intelligibly and
none of the five pabrol planes returned to the bas e,
' I'he first wave of a ttnc lr ing Ame:r:iCIlI l a ircraft
a rr iv ed at 0450 and the SO-minut e warning enabl ed
th .Japanese to throw 57 intercept ing aircraft atthis firsta rmlt wave, Moen No.1 contributed
20 Zekes, Eten 29 ~es. and Parnm Kates, in
!3
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 12/19
addition to the 5 Ko tes on pn t 1 0 0 1 . Altogether,
2 200 sorties were flown by American a ircraft, dnr-
ing the _-dllY operation. Of these 467 W re by
fighter-bomber aircraft, Bombs dropped totaled
74 8 tons,
The Jnpnnese had 1 ui rcraf t d ispe rsed a t fou r
island fields at the time of the raid. These were
deployed nsfollows: Moon No.1, six Bettys and 20
Zekes' Eten 10It 'Ving (night fight 1'8), and 35Zekcs' Param 12Jud'ys (carr ie r reconnaissnnce},
l ind 13Kates ; Dublon , 8 (ob sen. at ion and recon -
nai ssanee}. F if ty -n in e Japane se aircraft were
de h-oyed in the mid (including the 5 Kat on
patrol) itnd 34 were destroyed on the gr0U11d for
II. totcl of 93. h'tLlmel'ous other aircraf t were
damaged by str afing. From photo interpreta-
tions AmeriCllllS estimnted 16 T enemy aircrai t
present of wW e ll 6 3 were d trnyed In the a il ' IIud
60 on the ground.
In the ent ire island group, !23 buildings and 6
hangars wefe desb'6yed and 44 buildings were
damaged, Thes e figur es were obtained fr om in-
terpretations of photographs made at the time of
the raid.
The p e r ee n t .a g e o :f d amage to ins ta ll a t ions 011
principal 'islands ¢er the raid wa estimated to
be as f ollows: Duhlon,,w percent; Eten, 80 per-
cent ; ! fo en, 75 percent ; Fdan , 20percen t; Param ,
15 p ercen ; and Illalu 0 percent: These figures
were al c made from photographie 'interpretations
and donot inc lude damage enused byprior a t tacks.
hipping losses inc luded the H in o M a l' U, 11.1,500-
ton patrol craft; the Sapporo 1J[aru. a 6oo-ton
cargo ship; the Minaei j llaro a 300-t{ln 001'''0 ship ;
lind Ilpprorin:tately 20 other small craft." ,
Amw:iClln carrier losses amounted to 22 aircraft,
Two were los t on the inital f ig ll te r sweep while 20
were lost to antinu-cruft fil1l. Thirty-three uir-
craft were damaged.
Thi s c ar ri er a tt ack v ir tu ll ll y nul li fi ed ' I' ruk' svalue as a supply and air base, As n navul ba e
i t h ad been unt enabl e s in ce the f ir st c ar ri er s tr ik e
and its value to the J.pane. .o .e W'lr effort after 30
A.pril was negligible., 'I'hi does not mean that
the mmung B-24 and B- 29 r aids were value!
for without , the il ' harrassing effec t Truk undoubt
edly would bavs been able to replaoo its aircraft
l osse s to some ex tent .. I n : fu. ct ., de sp it e. t he B-2!
raids its nil' str ength was b_uilt up mater ially in
Ollr!y May. Japuuese rea liza tion of T~uk's deolin-
ing val LIB WIIS admit ted when lo,w m May the
Tr nk command was ordered to send 71 pl anes ,
i nc luding 59 f ight er s, t o Yap and Guam-e -ngain
reducing Truk to a low level. This order was ex-
plnined 11 II·measure to rec ti fy strategic misoa leu-
lntion by the Japauese high command, At first,
on the 8. ump tion tha t Al li ed major e ffor t would
be through the South Pac if ic , they distr ibuted the ir
ail' str ength in tIle Central and South Pacific in
a 40 and 80 percent proport ion respect ively.
When they decided that the next major effort
would be f arther north they s tripped Trnk to rein-
force Guam and YaIJ.
Britis h Carrier Attack, 16 June 1945
No All ied reports a re ava ilable concerning t h i sattack and information is derived solely from
Japanese sou rc es ; opinion s a re Japanese ns we ll .
One or pos sibly two B ritish carr iers f ormed the
a tt a. ck i: og force. The at ta ck was d iv id ed into two
waves=one cominrr in the late morning and the
other in the early afternoon, In t he f ir st wave, 18
to 2,j, Spi tf ir es ci rcl ed the a to ll a t a very h igh a lt i-
tude and then returned to t he c ar ri er , but 15TBFsand SBDs es corted by 6 to 9 Spitfir es arr ived as
the first flight departed. The second wave com-
priss d 15 FBFs and SBDs es corted by 6 to I) Spit-fires. .
T he attacking waves broke formation outside
the reef and ci rcl ed the ma in i sl ands a .t 9,000 feet.
They gradually descended to 3,000 feet and be-
gU ll t he ir a tt ack s at this altitude, Unlike .Ameri-
can aircraft they did not appr oach the target rap-
idly, but stayed at high altitudes f or a cons ider-
able length of lime surveying the area. Then
they bombed und Lrafed insignificant targe ts.
The SBDs und TBFs bombed from a 30° dive re-
l ea sing ' th ei r bombs at 1 ,500 fee t. The Spitfu.es,
,\Ctmg as top covel' while the bombing was' inpr ogress , dropped down when the TBFs and BDs
were ID I ished , a nd s tr afed a t ve ry low u lt it udes .
T he attack, principally against Dublon, E ten,
and Moen, caused practically no damage. The
bombiog , howeve r, d id p lU 't in ll y des troy reco rd s
nnd the Japanese, fearing that the attacks were a
prelude to an amphibious a s ault burned their r e-
maining files. Tlris fear was enilanced when on
17 June, a Bingle cruiser bombarded the is la:lds
although no invasion a tempt f~JJowed. '
No . Japane se f ight er s met t he a tt ack ItS it was IJ,
complete surprise, t is doubtf ul if the attaci[
~vould.h .a v~ b. e n o~posed bad. an al er t b e n g iven
m suffiCIent tame smell only SIX 01' seven ahcrnft
wel 'a eperatiollal on 'I'ruk at the time. The BI·il;-
i sh los t; f rom one to fou l' Spi tf ir es .
8-24 Attacks Against Truk
Attacks on 'I'ruk by llLud-based American B-24c
air crnft were made 01' the first time inMarch1944 and continued collsis tently until October
1944 when B- 29s began their experimental raids,
These] Inn were both 'elltC!1L Pacific and outh
Paci fic based, Because of the distances from
KwajnJ ei:1l nnd Empr es s Augusta Bay to Truk
( 900 to 950 miles) the bombers had to carry extra
gasoline ut the expense of their pity bomb load,
During that period more than 4 ,0 00 t on s o :f b om b s
were dropped on Truk installations. Size of the
attackinrr forces varied between 15 and 30 ai r-
craft, and bomb loads consisted primarily of 500
and 1,OOO-pounclhigh explosiva bombs and incsn-
diary clusters.
Althongh ( It .dy warning r adar usually picked
up t,he attacking formations 75 to 100 miles outand tracked them all the way ill on occasion the
B-24s evaded detection and encountered little or
no intarcepsiou. As an antidetection measurn the
a ttacking :force sometimes descended to minimum
altitude at a distanca of 150 miles out. This de-
c ep ti on wa s not rLlwayssucc essful i nc a under fav -
orable conditions Japanese radar could pick up
the bombers before they began thei r d escent .
At the time of the first B-24 rnids 101 nircraft
were based at Truk, more than 100 of which were
fighters. During April losses from combat and
cons ta nt bombing s reduced thi s force to 10<1tot al
aircra:ft including 65 fir st-line fighters , By May,this number wa cut to 11 air craft of which only
3 were operational, The carrie. raid of 29-30A .pril aided ma ter i It11y in briugin g this f igUl'e to
its low level .
By 13 June immediately pr ior to the Mariannas
campaign, Truk's strenath WI!.; increa ed to 25
f ight er s and 34 o f othe r t .ype s, bu t when the ~1n l' i-
annas campaign b gnn, all all' raft, with the ex-
ception 01 l es s t hun one-ha lf doz en observat ion
p lunas , were det ai le d £01' pnrtioipn MOll in that
campaign. None of these r eturned,
Fol lowi\lg the Mariannas enmpaigu, 35 ,w:cl 'l If t
were I1lust\Jred Itt Truk ; 8 were f ight er s acqu ir ed
from Palau and the remainder were patched-up
craft which had been damaged on previous raids,
Of the latter, only six or seven were operational at
anyone t ime,
F igures on losse s on ei th er s id e a re unavai la bl e.
Japan e verbal sources are i Jl de fu ti te a nd p rob-
ably 1lJI reli able,
No B-24s wer e seen to fall within the atoll dur-
ing the day but the Japane su pect that some
fell outside the reef because flak crippled many
over the islands. At night "five or six" were seen
to explode and burn over the . lands and pilot
report shooting d wn f ive to s even B-24 outs ide
th e atoll. Fighter interception dropped of!' per-ceptibly in enrly J1ll16 because al l avai lab le Jap -
nne se f ight er ai rcr af t; were commi tt ed to the Mar i-
1I.Il.Il1lS cnmpaign,
Japanese fighters utilized two principal attackt echniques for dayl ight operat ions : (a) air-to-
air bombing and (0) orthodox machine gun at-
taeks , 1Vhan 20 or more fighters were air-borne
to oppose the bombe r forma ti on s app roxima tely
two-fifths of thes e carried air-to-air bombs. In
f ight er force s o f l ess t han seven , allplane carried ,
these bombs,
By Japanese estimnt 30 per cent of B -24 los ses
were due to air-to-air bombing and 70 percent tonght el ' p la ne machine !!UJlS. LOsses due to fink
were negligible, they sta te .
By the end of ~Iay the B-24 attacks, with tit
uddition of the two car rier attacks had neutral-ized Truk, However', the proximity of Truk to
Guam made advisable, if not necessary, heavy at-
tacks dur ing June, to eliminate what minor value
Truk might retain and materially to assis in pre-
ventine Truk from rendering worth while aid to
the J apanes e forces in the M:adanns. For harass-
ing pm'pos es , Central Paci fic bomber'S dropped
569 tons of bombs 011 Truk during JUlI e. Thes e
were augmented by an additional 900 tons ofbombs fr om the Admitalty- bns ed 'I' hir teanth Air
Fol'OO bomber'S. Raids were made almo t everyday , mo tJy during dnyligh until 19 JUlle.
Attacks after J\ule obviated the pos sibility of
rehabilitating airfields and fac il it ies suf fi ci en tl y to
u se them as base for r econna issance Bight s.
8-29 Experimental Raids on Truk
InOctober 1944, Truk was sel ect ed a s the t arge t
£ 0 1 ' a series of asperim ntal bombing attacks by
B-~W's newly bused in the Mariunas, These at-
15
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 13/19
tacks later becaml> routine tralning' missions nnd
outinued until the end of the war with size of
a ttacking forces varying between one . ll .I ld30 a ir-
craft, On 32 missions throughout this 10-month
pe ri od approxuJ l9 .te ly 1 .727 ton o f bombs were
Uropp.:cr . A few attacks were made us ing bl~d
bombing methods . Exac t f igu res on these t rai n-
jn" missions ,U"Il not avn.i lnble aud only approxi-d.tions can be made f rom available stat! tics .
From July 1944 IJ1It il th\ )war's end only 35oper-
ational aircraft were ba d on 'I'ruk, 1 of which
we.re f ighters . Of the totnl, never morn than six
or seven were Rj"able nt anyone time. Many of
these were rebuilt - 0]" patched up after damage
from previous raids, which inqual it y and num-
her s, made the Truk-based f igh ter pl ane compl s-
ment a decidedly inferior force. Truk's ground
defense included only 40ant in ir er af t gnn o f poor
qui ll ity and without radar control .
Japanese r epo rt only one B-29 d tl ll lf tg d by f la k
and none lost to anti aircraft fire 01" to fighter .
A.ir-to-air bombing WIIS at temp ted dur ing the first
f ew B-29 at ta ck s bu t was qu ick ly di arded sine
against this type aireruft the inferior Japanese
lighters could not c limb to a lt itude quickly enough
nor maneuver with enough facility to make the
ILttam e i fo o ti v e .
No sta tist ics ure ava ilable 011 Japunese losses.
Iti bel ieved tha f ew plane s we re los t in aerial
combat for two I"IlD.SOllS: (a) .T apanese pilots were
reluc tant to a ttack and (b) a ll f lyable aircraft were
orde red to t ake o ff a nd d isper se I J1I tl l t he a tt ack s
were over.
. .l .c tnnl ly these bombing nttacks had litle mu-
t er ia 1effec t on Truk b e c a u s e there were no longer
( lilY worth-while targets . However, they pre-
vented reconsrruet ion of above-grouud insta lla-
tion , and the Japanese officer consensus was tha t
Truk could have made a grndual , small -sca le come-
back were it not for the ince sant, aCCUTIt te a t-
L l t C J . . . " S of the B-29's. Tokyo bad planned to use
Param Field n a ba e for suicide attacks on
Dl it hi bu t the B-29 attacks kept the field in 11
state of dis repair and th" pInn WIlS finally aban-
doned. Japanese descr ibed t.lle accuracy of the
B-29' s a "e. xool le nt " aud they expressed admi ru-
tion over the effective coordlnution between photo-
reconnaissance and the B-:29 attacks,
16
S of Effectiveness of Allied Operationsu.mmary .Against TrukDur ing the entire ' I'I·uk campaign more than
416 ai:rcraft were destroyed. Naval a nd m e rc h u, nt
shipping de st royed mc luded three J igh t crui se rs ,
four d troyers, one !;(!itpl!llle tender, one sub~-
r il le t ende r one patrol v essel , 33 merchan t ships ,
nnd nume rou s sma ll cr af t and f ishing boa ts .Ai r. 6eld faci li ti es were comp let ely de st royed
e ar ly in th campaign. Wel l- cons truct ed or ig in al
bui ld ings were replaced with Rimsy wooden struc-
tures in in r anees where replneements were made
lit a ll : Wheuever possible, suppl ies and equipment
Wille moved into bombproof caves . All airfields
were intermittent! y in a li t! out of commission after
t he- fi rs t c ar ri er r ai d. "Po st -hol ing " the oJ rf iel ds
with 100- and 250-pollucl bombs \Vl),S the best tactic
to neutralize all the a irfields except Param, where ,
t he he av ier bombs proved to be more ef fe ct iv e, for
due to t he f ie lds insuf fi ci ent el ev "t ion above sea
lev 1 the deeper craters would 611 with seeping
water. Moen No.2 airstrip was ulmost ent irely
abandoned after the ]6-17 February 1944 mid,
Eten was ellti rely abandoned after tile raid of
29. ..aOApril , and Pararn WItS abandoned in July
1944.
Island Installatlons were roughly 90-95 percent
destroyed except for a few which were under-
ground In bomb-proof caves,'
Rationing of f uel provi ions , and ummunition
began early in 1944. Although bombing attacks
wer responsible, in part, for acute shor tage, sub.
marine warfare wa said to be the pr imary c au se .
A ft er Ju Iy 1D44 , "II officers, enlisted men, and civil-
Jans were formed into groups und given a small
area of land on which each group was responsible
for planting. culti vuting, and harves ting its own
food.
AS {L navul base Truk lost its effectiveness on 4,
Feb ruary 1944 when the ' I' ruk -based f le et e vucu-
ntsd following the an-ivnl of the B-24 photo-
reconnaissance ship.
'I'he firs t carrier mid of 16-17 February 1944.
minimized Truk' s va lu e lIS a supply bass. The
Fourth Fleet; Supply Base (which served both
urmy and navy) W(lS unable to complete its mis-
s ion af te r t he ini ti al r ai d in which. l osses included
prov is ion s, 7 !i pe rcent ; fuel , 70 pereen t ; a vi at ion
s tores, 65 percent; clothing, 60 perceut; and am-
Inunition, 35 percent. As I~ de fen se mea sure the
~'I lmll in ing ru:nrol~t ion.wus stored in d am p C (L Ve S,
and 40 petC0I!t of this was destroyed tlu·ough
detcriorn.tion.
As It fa1"1"Ydepot aud nil ba T ruk 10sL lts vulue
niter the Febl"lmry 1944 cllrrier attaek. Only a
hand fu l o f a ir crn. it were f lown th rougl l T rt lk f rom
the Bmpire. a defensive fighter base, it be -
came inefi'ecti ve in s urly May 1944, and its value
otally disappeared in June 1944. Aiter July
]944, only 35 ,.ircruft were based on Truk llJl~ of
rhasa only (I 0 [·7 were opemt iona l at ! lny one tOO!! .
IV. PHYSICAL DAMAGE AND AREA STUDY
This study was made OIl the eight lal"O"estand
mos t s trategically important islands in the Truk
gr oup-.Dublon, Moen, Etell, Purum, dot, Fefnn,
Ula lu , and Um,m. "tudy group members, accom-
plluied by Jltpullese l ia ison officers (1I1dinterprs-
ters, visited both dnmaged and undamaged in tal-
lations. At each instnllation tl1e Japanese officer-
ill-charge had prepared, ItS previously requested
u plan showing the origiunl installation and bomb
damage incurred. Unfortuna ely, i n. some Cl1SCS
the bet te r- infol"moo p arsonnel had J . , . n evacuated,
end only henr say informa ti on wa s ava il ab le; how-
ever, descriptions of raids, num hers of aircraft,
and damage resulting f rom al.tacks are Japanese
"ou the scene" " ! D . ions . Japun se wer extremelyCOUTteoUS und coopsrutive in answering quest ions.
Island l · O : 1 - d S were narrow and in extremely
poor condition. Almost !,U important buildings
had been deseroyed 01' extensive ly damaged, and
all available lana W1 under ult ivat iou .0 grow
vegeta ble s for food .
A.ccording to Survey team observations nod
Japanese information it uppears tha t:
(a ) The currier raid of 16-17 February, for the
most part, neutmlized ' I'ruk us a major enemy rUr
and naval base.
(b) The second carrier raid destroyecl the im-
po r t au t sho re inat al lu ri ons and complet ed the . d e-
s truct ion o f Truk as a major air base.(c) High-alt.it:nde bomber maintained, to. a
marked degree, the nautrnlization of T'ruk's U1r-
fields.
(d) The defeu asof fink, both [!Dtiuil"Cl;trl~ and
coastal were highly ovenuted and consisted
mos tl y' o f outmoded equipmen t.
(e) Af ter the 16-17 February carrier raid, the
Japanese had until 29 Apr·il to move underground.
Itappears tl1at they utilized this time to gt"llat
o .a vantllge.
Dublon Island
The or ig in al Fourth Communication~ Corp
ell tee consisted of several frame buildings on
concrete foundations, two concrete shelters for
radio receivers and rerno e-control transmitting'
pos it icn s, and two 30-met sl · s te el a nt enna towers.
Fir t damage occurred on 15 March 19H:, when
attacking B-24s jnflicted about 10 percent dam-
nge--pal"tially destroying 2 buildings. Addi-
tional bomber attacks occurred In June and Au-
gust 1944 and by the end of the latter month all
buildings were destroyed.
Fou rth F le et Headq ua rt er s cons is te d o rigina ll y
of th re e wooden bu il ding s wi th concret e fot ll "l d( l. .
ti ns. The fir t attack to administer rious dam-nge OCCUlTedon 1 April 1944. B-24:s using 500-
pound G. P. bomb destroyed. about 40 percent 0
t he bu il ding s, a lt hough about 25 percent r es tora-
tion was accomplished by 1 May. At che ime of
this attack, Fourth Fleet Headquarters was evacu-
ating tile building so damage was not seriou .
The accounting section took over the buildings
and during its tenancy a s cond attack occurred on
12 June 1944. Al though. bui ld ing s were pa rt ial ly
res to red even af te r this uttack, the greates t blow
wa to records and offi.ceequipment .
New Four th Fl eet . Headquarters was housed in
0PIlIl air buildings .10 by 30 meters with frame
cons truct ion, c oncret e foundat ion, wooden f loo rs ,
and corrugated iron roofs, Al though the c ar ri er
raid of 29 apl"il effec ted about 50 percent damage,
repair wus made ill 5 days. A.gain, 110We1i 'er,
records were destroyed and communications dis-
rupted.
:J!:ight frame barracks and three food store-
houses made IIp th fourth construction depart-
ment headq unr ters and bnrracks, Buildings were
f rnm e with concrete foundat i ons and galvanized
iron roofs, Located in the open, the unit was
17
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 14/19
au e asy bu. ·g et a nd 0 Iate .Ul1reh l!l ,b l, B-2J raid
caused 80 percent d truetion to the bnrrnck .
Warehouses wer e d tr oyed in May 19M. Fol-
l owing the :Ma rch raid personnel relocated bar-
ra I.5 areas in the bills and coustru ted shacks
from salvaged material, The mid on the ware-
house destroyed 1000 tons of r ice, 15 percent of
the i l I J 1 d grou p s total store.Ol-iginally, the naval base=Forty-fu (; Navul
Guard Un. it .- -inc luded one headquarters bui ld ine
l'.ig11tbnrrncks five !!lU"age~and one sick btLy.
Cr uhj'lg blows to this in tallaticn were ndmin-
istered on 29 April 11)# (20 percen t damage) and
in mid-July 1 ~ (60 percent damage). Bepau
were not attempted I I1ld per sonnel were d riven to
the hill where they cons truc ted sha cks f rom sal-
vaged material, On 30 Octo bill', 60 percen t o f t he
remll in ing bui ld ings were destroyed or damaged.
The finaJ attack made by B-29s on T August
des troyed 11bui ld ing s and par ti al ly des troyed a.Thi s o rgar ri za ri on ' wa ter supply system wa
eliminated by the latter raid. Fresh water had
been obtllined by a system of gutter s and piping
which collected min water from the roofs and
stored i t in concrete tanks . With the destruction
of the bui ld in it became nec essa ry to p ipe f resh
water from another source, and installation of
p ipi ag for till purpose took 3 months,
The transportation department, charged with
the r ponsibility of unloudins s upplies for stor-
agE! and redistribution, WIIS located in t he dock
urea and WIIS housed in l ight frame bui ld ings with
concrete foundat ions used lIS both wurehousas and
Iiving quarters.
Although fire bomb , which were used exclu-
sively a ainst thi5 i ns ta ll u ti on, de st royed only
seven buildings the mos t crippling damage was
against the water craft used for unloading sup-
plies. Of 50 sampans, 20 were destroyed I\11d 20were rendered uns erviceabla Three 10- to 15-ton
Diese l tugs IIJ1d six gasoline launches were de.
strayed. As mentioned previously in this report
lack ofpiel 'S or wharfs prevented direc t nuJoadin~
of large vemels Ddld t he los s of tlle sampans, the
best means of shuttling upplies £Z'om ship to
sho re, was a c ri ti cal one .
The Trnk fuel supply bnse consisted of four
10,OOO-tonk'lnks, one 7,OOO-tontank, one 2 OOO-ton
tank, ~d On 5~0-ton btnk. All underground sys_
t em p lped gusol in e to !lfue l-pump ing s ti lt ion on a
18
nearby pier where it was loaded on fuel barges
which refueled both surface erll£!; lind submarines,
The barg Ileet consisted origin~y of one 50?-
ton craft one 200-tol1, and one 50-ton. Pre-mid
transf er of the largest to Palau and des truction of
the 200-toll barge in t he 30Apr il c ar ri er raid leftonly th mallar barge for all refueling. The 17
February carrier raid wiped out 60 percen of thelank instnllntion and 90 per cent, or 16,000 tons,
of Truk'a entire fuel oil upply, Two 10,OOO-ton
t anks we re de st royed l ind several o th er s damaged
by f r ng1 11 lm t 1 1 01 e . A l IO t! JO I'lO,OOO-tontank and
the two mallest tanks were badly damaged in
April 194-1. Th pier fue l-pumping sta tion WIIS
destroyed by a heavy bomber mid late ill 19\14,
although the IT February raid already had
knocked out Truk comple aly as a f ueling station,One hanga r, approx imately 12 bar racks bui ld-
ill!!S seve ra l smal l r adio t ral lsmi tt ing bu il dings ,
and n field control tower made up the seaplane
bnsa, The f ir st c ar ri er r ai d reduc ed the f iel d oper -
at ing value to 30 percent o f t he or iginu l c apa ci ty .
A dir ect hit on the contr ol towel' by incendiary
bombs completely eliminated that fllcility and it
was never rebuilt.
Raids of 30 April and 1 May 1941 totally de-
stroyed the hangar lind 12 barracks buildings,
The a irfield opera ting capac ity, even with repairs,
never rose above 50 per cent of its original figure.
All major engine overhaul wa dons at the airsupply and repair department lind for that pur-
pose a number of hops compri ed the pre-raid
ms talla tion. Thes e included strnctueal repair,
p l"op~er repair, enz ine l :epl l; ir , inst rurnant repair,
welding, carpenter service, for ging, electric r e-
pal l' , o xygen generat ing and ref il li ng , sme Jt il lg ,
expl i,'e torage, three aircraft pare parts build-
ings, IL power p lan t, a nd f iv e bar ra cks .
Currier raids of 16-17 Febrnnry reduced the
usefulne ss o f t he repai r d epa rtmen t by 80 pe rc en t
when the s truc tu ral , propel ler , e ng ine, a nd ins tru>
men t repai r shops ! lnd two supply bui ldin! !S werecompletely destroyed. '"
The c ar ri er r ai d o f 29-30 Ap t' il comp let ely neu -
traliz",d the value of all r emaining bui ld ing s ex~
cept t he powe r pl an t 8 JJd the oxygen g ll ner ll ti ngplll;nt.
The ship repnil' ba , also known as the fourth
llnval dockyard, mnde emergency repairs on de-
s tl 'Oyer s l ind smal l \ ·essel s. I t wa kep t b .u sy p rior
to I,he r aids by.repairing s hips damaged by nited
Stlltes suhmarines 8n ~ n;fte r the mids by repairing
bomb dnmaae. ~t tlll.s IIlstl1.llation was a drydoek
en,pabl e of dock1 l1g ships of 2 ,500 ton s n lt houg ll i n
prnciJ '8 2,?DO t on wa the limit set by the Jnpa-
nes: Until J.O Febl'Illll'Y 1944 u repair ship was
Itl'uLlable but It departed with t.he fleet for PalauOJl tha t date,
TIllS ure a w u not attacked in the raids of 16-]7
FelmHlrY,bllt· it , did fore . the Japan e to move
the ship repair fa ' ilil.y underground, In 3months
II we ll -c nmonf lnged underground shop resul te d.
D spite this precaution howev r, ill 2f)-30 April
n tt ack c au sed n dal l1! tge o f upp roxima , ely 25 per -
cent a nd tl d ive -bombe r di rec t h it 011 the mnchins
shop de troyed 30 perc nt of the equipment nnd
knock d out the repair buse fOl ' a month.
The submarino bu e consi ted of II t orpedo re-
plenishing; adju,ting, and upply tation and
prncticallj' no overhaul or repair work was done.
This area was no hit in the Februaty 19M raids
und, [isw ith the s hip repair ba e, t he Jupunese im-
med iat ely began cons truc ti on of an unde rg round
tution for adjusting torpedoes , The submarine
base was first hit in the 2n-30 Api- il r ai d nnd sut -
fered 10' es of 40 percen 0 buildings find 25 per-
cent to torpedoes, In JUly the surface sta ion for
torpedo udjusting was hit und damaged. Subse-
quen t rn ids wiped it out completely bu the under-ground 8 tn t; O il was still ituct when the tudy
was made,
Moen Island
Moen No.2 airfield which wus [I. aplune base
prior to the 16-17 February 'o;rrilll' raid hnd a
single l lhstrip 1 ,000 meters long-Ql1e-thi l' ,l W!lS
concr te and two-third wns crush (1 rock. Ill-
stallution included 2 hunger s sever al mull udju-
cent l'IUlJPS, 2 control tntiOHS 10 bnrmcks and
misce llan ous struc tures.
Tni t i n1 dumuge wus sus t« ined by t hi s f ie ld elm-
ing the 10 FebnllH'Y lIN4 'aI Tjer rnid. Fourteen
p!ttnes, the entire field complement nt the illl,were ,set onrB by stl"llnng nml the field contr ol
I'ower WII comp let ely de t r·oyed . . One hange r was
t...ullJ' destroyed filld t,)10other reca l" ee l 0 percent
damage.
Fol lowi ll a t he f ir t a tt ll ck the Jop ll ll esemude no
at telllp l; to ~hl1bjlitate the field as a s eaplane base
but contiuued wOl"k on the lUI' trip with the idea
of using it as IL . fighte r &trip and elDe! 'gency fie lr l.
The raid of 29-30 April finished off almost nil
of the reruaining usable in tallations. III Ihi ut-
tack the bnrracks power plant lind torehouse
were completely d troyed. Repairs to the dam-
'(ga were never made Rlthough a new control sta-
I ion l ind '1 Jl w billet were con tructed, The con-
t rol t ut ic n WAS partly damaged und th new billet
corn pletely demolished in nn attuck of 1 Fehru-
'lry 1fI45. Th ail·liel ~ proper WIIS damaged III
on lhn. t date and could operate at only 60 percent
elliciency thereafter.
Moen ~o. 1 airfield, one of th most importantin the area, inc luded ,1 1 200 meter runway COIl-
structed of 4- to 6-inch thick r inforced concrete
and II total of mol' than 0 buildings uch as han-
g.•I"S, cont ro l s tat ion, b ar racks , a nd mi ce ll nneous
mall tru 'tures.
Moen o, 1 was first attacked on 16 February
19i4, when cnrrim- planes mad It sh'aling attack
on the parked planes, The attack, which cam as
n complete surpri e , destroyed 1 1 1most al l of IL 50·
plane contingent on the ground, about one-half of
which were shipboard-type plan 1 ft by a car-
r isr' which had departed "ball a week before.
A B-24 h ir rh a lt it ude Itt a ck, on 29 March I f) ,) ,4 ,
des troyed 10 fr ame bur-rack and fill uncompleted
hangul'. Of the barracks, six were burned unci
four were demolished. ix B tys were burned
011 the ground j n tli 29-30 April 19,),4 m id and
oue B tty and two fighter were des royed du ring
II raid ill :Mayor June 19-14. ubsaqu nt raids
were s o numer ous that the Japanese made 110fur-
ther e : ! i O l · t to k p t ra ck of the i Ie number nnd elf ct.
The longe t interval dw.·illg which tI,e field was
1l0~ operational was a 20·day paciod followina a
high nlritu Ie heavy bombardment in pril 19!5.
All 1"U i ds uecount ed for It total destrnctiou of 33
barracks, -wnrdroorus, '2 con 1"01 ration , '2 ready
1" am ,1 hnnear and 4 temr orarybnrrncks. Dum-
uged but no t dest royed were 26 temllOral"Y bar-
racks.
Eren Island
Tl lC uir st:ri p on E tcn I land "11 one f he be t
cOllsb'ucted ill the Truk I lund group. Its dimeJ1-
sion were 1 0 00 by 0 weters with a eU'culal' t l L ' \ U
loop COllDe ting t.he ends of the trill. Tbe stril)
was sudnccd with a 5·oontimeter thlckness of
Ilsphult-cemeut-l'ock mix on a olid. rock fill.
19
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 15/19
El IIs smull ize nllow d {Ot' few parking r evet -
meuts , Old el l rib-filled fuel drums, cnruoutlnged
wil h growing 1'3S-<;eS and vines provided some
prot et ion for the disper ed planes, TI le admin-
i st ra ti on b ui ld in g, adjac nt to the nirstri] . was of
modern des irru and of !lXt rn he9.VY re inforced
concrete eonstruericn.
TIm raids of 16 Febrnurv 1!)44 came with onlv
10 minutes' W lll 'l l ing to tl 1!1 Ju pa[w se on Et",;,Although damage to instnl lu tions wa only minor
the .Iupanese air force;in that sector of the theater
wn dea lt 9. crushing b low when 110 out of 200 V O 1'-
iou types air l"aft, awai ting fe rry p ilot nt Eten,
were trafed and burned. The attack on Eten on
17Febl'tllllj wn negligible. since these forl\ys were
pri rruu-ily against shipping, Although the air-
srr ip, which had undernone only minor damage,
\\"11 repaired in 2 days the taxi-loop wa 0 heav-
ily pock-marked that it repair never was at-
tempted especially in view of t he fact that repair
work was hampered by water seepage caused by
the small dif fere.nce between the f ield elevation and
the sea at high tide,
The next important mid took place on 1"March 194!, when hmvy bombers using 500 1,000·
pound genernl purpose bomb , caused the fo llow-
ing dnmaga : even plunes des troyed , 19 p lan
dlllDnged, and 1 hangul' damaged. Eight more
planes were d troyed and damaged by u B-24raid on 28 Mo..reh.
Th currier mid of 29-30 April "vir ually unlli-
lied this field for further operations when 11
f ighter pluues wen destroyed "II barracks de-
s trayed. 2 h'Lllgllt'S dcstroyed, 50 1 I . i rcra it enginesde troyed and the admini tration buildi ng dam-aged.
Param Island
, Aside frOID nnt ini rcr aft defenses, Pa ram a ir-
Ii Id. was the only im;t.allulion of impor tnnce 011
the )~nnd. Its runway, originally 1,200 1DC er~
long III January 19!!, WIlS l engthened to 1 ,430
meters by Api'll of thnt yenr to uccommodate
Iaruer ~hcrn1t. A taxiway wa compJeled:lt the
same time and by July 19!! 17 rev tments fOI"
sma ll p lanes and 3 for medium-s ized p lanes ~" Il r~
const ruc ted, Only smal l bnrr acks were bu i l t dueto luck of tir,neand maoorio,ls,
20
DllI·illg the J6 February r u i rl • • \ .me l ' ic .m plau~s,
lL"uHnglind bombing, el i posed of 17 J(lP'UI(!SCuir-
crnft OIl the gL"OlU\d,1 mess hu ll , and ; \ t rucks,
0111y "nil minor intervening T~ -2 4 mid oc nirred
be fore the curri er mid of 2 :1-30 Apri l, the e ffect s
of which deal t Ilcrushi ng blow to the island ta·
d] i t ie s, Six p lanes wer e des troyed 011 tJIG ground
by $tnlfu, lg, 4 (Oil of provision" 15,000 liters
of '" inrion !!llsolillll, lind 1 ton of engines andp'". p,u't were rendered useless. In addition.
d ivs bum bel'S rnnti luted the !'lLn\I·I1)' and tax i Wlty,
1 I' 1u (, h d o.magll wns anhauced by the dilliculty to
make runway repa ir 011 the i81"" ,1. In ."ddition
to the fact flUlt low elevutiou caused the bomb
crate rs L o lill with wntpr t he only I111'nnS o 'E L ' e p l \i r
I\"~Sto lilt ill i li e holes with c rushed rock, todiou 1)'
t ransported fr om another i sl and, TO s tock pile
() r crush ed rock had be e n established for 6JIJer-
:re l lcy und thi s oversight, too, added to slowness
of repair.
Consistent hurassi I1g high a lt itude bombard-
nwn.~ rni r. lJ. kept the l ip id i ll a s ta te. o f d isr epai r
whi 'h ultimately caused the J"'i'ilJlese 10 abnndon
their plan to use this field as a buse for gil icide
uttueks on ships nt Ulithi.
Felan Island
The n01'111111 eomplerueut of F fun was 2,700
lu',ny troops and l,50( ) navy personnel ( Including
some Jnpucnese and Korean civilian workers}.
sed principally us a SUIJply point , the i sland was
equipped with one of the best piers in the atoll for
unlonding SI\\Il.U O OR t an d insl"llittions included
10 provision wurahousas, 10 large ammunition
dumps and Ii tamporm-y ill dium sized umnnnri-
tion dumps.
,F fan o bv io usl y w as not a main target for any
r aid a lthough concen tr ated a tt ack on the Ih'St raid
!Duy ItILl'G wiped out, extensive supplies: especially
ammunition. since niter th initial raid ammuni-tion ws moved from open topped dumps and
tor ed in tunnel s lind caves 01 " t ransfer red to all-
other island.
Sight-l'uitli11g B-24s truck the ini ti al b low
against the i~an(~during the lat te r par t o f M9.rch
1?44. ~ll ammunit ion dump was dest royed by th~
direct hit, of the only bomb to strike the island.
On a second B-24 night t'll id in April another
laue 100mb set alire a provi tons IVII,l· house and
deStroyed ([,\1 ammunition dump.
'rile Mt'l"ie"l· mi d of 29-30 Apri! dsmolished two
open- type provi ion war ehouses, and .lUO her pro.
visions w!ll'eh?u ', In addition, dllmage W[lS i11-
f licted ~oan a.ir raid shelter !t11c1 a torpedo dump.
I ut er Jl ]l tt en t 1 '1 11 (1 6between May 1944 nne] July
1 94 5 n ce o un tc d £01' tInea opell-I 'J 'pe ummunieiou
dUl11ps, It sawmill, Ami a civiliun barrack .
UWu Island
A.JIY strategic value that mi"'h~ be attributed to
I;bis island Jay in th presence of its radio dire -
tiou-f inder s tation. This equipment WIlS used
solely £01' homing ail ' ·raft , and a continuou watch
was J10t kept-nor Wl\S moni tor ILlg a tt empted, AI -
tbot1gh t he e qu ip me nt \VIIS en y to maintain i
was not conside red dependab le or nCCUl'ate und i ts
succe ful operation depended 010 tly on the
abi li ty and expe rience of the opera tor .
Fi l'St n ttac k on this ilsto 11L t i011 WI lS a strafing
wave follow d by clive bombers 011 17 February
1044 which wiped out rhr eRDF units and burned
sever al war ehouses. The : ., 9-30 Ap ri l. C l U Ti er mi.l
destroyed all lnr rrueks unr l wllrehollsell , and Ivhi l l l
tlm I'Cmainulg RDF unit wus not knocked out its
VIII u e H Ireu tly h nd be e n d estroyed i11 the first
attack, a !though the one remaining unit could
till be used for lloming p U l· pO S S nnd I' certain
conditions,
Uman IslandMi1itm'y personnel 011 thi s i sl and was composed
of 1,330 navy nnd 50 army. Principal in tallu-
t ious of sh'jJ.tRgic importnnce were he rad io tr t l l lSr
lTDting station, IIrndur s tation, coest defense guns,
and a watch tow r for ubmarine loop",
Although the raid of 16-17 Fehrmll'. . truck
nea r Umun. und sunk seven ships e li I' rs er l 1 H ; ! U ' b y ,
Ibe island itself was not attacked until the carrier
raid of 30 April. LI thi s raid 011 t ransmi tt er
building was bum done demolished and nine
transmitter were destroye I. 'I'his effected vir-
tual tota l al imination of the tmnsmitt ing faci l-
ities since the radio station w as not rsparable and
was navel' replaced.
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 16/19
UNITED STATES STRATEGIC BOMBING SURVEY
LlST OF REPORTS
The fol lowing ; ._~ biblio,gn>l'_hyof reports result ing fromIhe Su.~.y'.stu die s of th e Europesn "",0' Paetbc warsCortain 01these repor-ts may be purchased [rom the , U l>"r :Into"~":"t"f Doeuments etrbe Gevernrnent Printing Office,WJlsbil1gtOll.,D ,. C . Perm.¥oll to eaemlne the remaining"'ports may be fu>dby w rt tmg t o th eH l! ll d~I lA rI "m o f lh eSUIVey, t he p ,, "t ogo" , W"elL lngton 25, D . C .
European Wa.r
OFFICE OF THE CHAIR:\UN
The Unit ed S ta t e e S [. ",t q,i c Bomb ing Surve e- Sum"m"l)' Report lElltOpe8D 'IV at) -
2 Th". Uni ted St. at il 'S81ml "' ;0 Bomtl iDg urvev: 0 ," ", -"U RepOTt (E=pean \\-ar) .
3 The EHoom of Str ato gio Bombing "" lh e GmmanW n,r E<ooomy
AlRCR.~.PT Dr.'lSION
(By Divtoi<m and Branoil)
4 Ai•• mr~ DM.lon Ind ustey Report5 1ll9[>OOliol1 Visit> to \'snolL'l Targnll; (Special' R.opo,c)
A i: rf ra m es B : ra .D c _b
B Junk"", Alr.ra ft a nd Ae ro E1lgin e Wor k>! Desss uGermanv I I
7 Eda~"1" , -eh inc . ", .. " . ke C m to H Hel to,bH ek, Oerman8 "T C )1o.sehinen!mu, G m b 'H , J"';pzig (Mool;au)
Gmn!lnv I
100 Gc thae r \Vaggon.rnbrlk A COoth.. Oo,=y
Foeke lYulf Air~rn.ft Ffunt , B~amcnJ Germany-
{
OV"'"81J ReportII l>I""""",.hmltt Jl. 0, Part, A -
"u!l"burg, CCrutl!JlT Part, B
_ , , ' . . " - " p e D d io " " I, n, J II12 DCo rmor \-l-_~ru, Frtcdneluthaf<m & ~'hmich, Oem,,,,,y] 3 ~r!mtd Flescler Wer k " C m b H, Kn.sscl, G erman vI oJ . W reuer .N eustaedt or Flugae ugwe ekc, W ione, N c u -
.lJId 1" A ""Iria
Aero Eng]neo Branch
1 5 B"~Dg NAG. Ph,g"wi.orenwer k~ G m b H llr llDS-"., ek, Gennnny ,
16 M~~,; ,~)~\!ta.hQ l\Iolorcnw.,ke a m b H, '1'U"ohn,
1 ' ' 7 B I 1~ a :. rj un ~ r ot or \ V or ks T : nc , E . L: m 1l 8 cl t & . Du:rr~r}mrGe.M .I1o.oy . -,
IS Bny"riocbe Mo(ur onw".ka A G (13~IW) M" nioll_ G4J r lt l .n :ov t
19 fl<m'OI101 1 ' 1 " gmtI\Oren work. , }(_ol, G"rmtl.ny
Ugh! M " ta l ' B .r ..n<b
20 Light Io-Iotal. InduBt, y{Pl Ir t I A luminumor Germany Pnrt It, Mn!!ll""luru
22
21 , \ " r " e . r e i n i g t c Deu l sc h u l I e !; I !. t ti , ~ ·, c .r k j) , Iltldcshcim, (Jer-
IPQI\Y22 , \l et angu", ,~ Il ';Ql ta .r t. GIn b 11, ' ", II '. IK , GermanyZ3 _~Ium.i"il!m,,-crk G ttl b H , P lnnt ).l". 2. llj~t"rlald,
CPJrm1l.n :}~
2 ~ , G c bn ie ! l< ; r· Ginti,,; G m b I I, L u dw l gs h nf un Ocrn:mnr'2;; L"ft""h.ilfb~u Z o_ pp el ln G m b 11" ~'tlcclri.h.h"ren
all Bodensee, Geno:ii.:n,·28 Wlemod Wer!. :e A G, Ufm, Oer", ', ,1Y27 R "dol p h Ra u ta nb ach I ",tcltmelJ\n!ll~_ rol en , Sol !n-
_ gen, GermanyZ S L ip pu we rk e Ver e inig : t e A l um i 1' Ji uH l \" 'c r k! ,. l A 0, Lnnon,
Germ.&IlY29 Ver ein lg te D eu ts ch e ~ [" ta tl w"t ke , H edde rnho lm ,
GormruLj·30 DU""D~rMotall \!""rke A G, Duren Wi~\elm"-.B,, tl i"
" , f . : '~.tulen~ Germany
AREA STUDIES DIVISION
31 A .. .. S tu di .. D iv is io n Repor t32 II Q"!8i1ec:1 Studl' of the ElI •• " , of Are l l Bombingon Hamburg
33 A Det ail ed S tu dy o f t.ho ElIoel~ or Aren Bomhingon WuppetUlI
3 '1 A Det ail ed S tu<l .v o f ~h " Em" cls o f A_ ro ll B ombingon Dueseldorf .
35 II Detailed Stud)" of the mfe. ts Qr Arn" Bombingon&Ii"So"
30 A Detailed Stu<! r of the EI f ec I, of Aro< >Bombingon Re rnsobe id .-
37 II DoWiled BLUdy o f rhe 11:ffacts o f Ar "a B om b ill gon DSTm!i!ndt
3S A Detailed Study Q f th..E;ff"ol~ of Area Bombingon Lubeck ~
ag A I !r i~ 1 S~udy Q I th e E IJ "" t,, . o f A re a Bo,n iJ in g onBerlln, Au~gsl:IlI.rg! DOU~UIl:U., r~ipz.igr Hagen, Dort-I II 1 1nd I Dber hnu BCD, Se l l "VCI n fu r t, ill]d B OO .m a11
CIVl].JAN DEFENSE DIVISION
JO Ch' il ia o Det en se Di vis io n-Fin n) R epor l,4 1 Cologn . Field R"pe r \
~2 Bon', Field ]lepnrt48 HilO)ovI>rFjold-RaporL
44 H n " : l ' O b l l r g F;cld.R"J><'rt -Vol l, Text· Vol IT E"hibllJ8:~ n.u. ld.. loe FIeld Report ' ," Augsbu rg Field Uope , ~
41 llcoopt.Ji01l A.ro:as i f . ! B.[I:,varia., Ce.rmn.ny •
EQUIPMENT DIVISION
HIc clrl.oJ Branoh
~~g~~~~:n~~,~iir!~ b ~ ~ K r . . ~ ; ' bi~~~!!r~llt"p_ort- "" LJ w.J ' G e r m _ P o n y
Optic.] and h o"'81on l"llr ume nl Br a~ch
50 Opli"",l and Proei$io ll l!l.tn.tmen~ l- d " Rn u.s"ry epoFL
Ab.ushes Branch
M Tho 0 crml>n Ab,,,,,; ve I ndu s ky.' i2 , ,' Ia_ve , and SchmIdt, OlTcnb l lch on Ml>in" G."",,"y
An tl- Fdel ion Brnneh
r ,3 T llo a crm, ," Antl -, Ftl cWnn Bea rin gs j" '!UB I 'y
Maehi ue Too t. B ra nch
64 l I' ll l"h~ ll e Tool. & M~Qhio'"r)' II.'! Cnpitnl Eqllillmc"t55 l \' fl lch; "" Tcol Inc l\ l" try tu Germ~oy
,;6 H"rwal\ Kolh ce, Cologne, Cerroa,,),57 Col le t . . nd .E l1g~lhn ,d , OlJc l I "<lCh , Germtllly5 8 N fl :' -i :O :SUnlcn, ' Fr ll nk r. or L o u :v rn i n . J Germany
MlLlTAItY ANAI.YSIS DIVIS10N
oll 'I'll" l le r. ,i l. ~ of ~bc G."nuTI Air Force60 V -Wcapo !J " (Cros sbow ) Campai gn61 Nr For"e l in[.(l of Operat ion62 Well t her Factors in Com b at, Born bardm Of! I' 0 pnrn-
t io ll s i ll t he Europeau TheaLnla 3 Bombing Accuraoy, USAAF IIea"y and Medj"",
Bomber s in the ETOM Descr lptlon o[ ItAF BombingMil The Ilnpsot o r th o A ll ie d A ir E lf ot l o n Go rman Log -
i'stic;s
Mo.RALE DIVISION
Mil Th e E ff "" _,, , o f S tr at eg i" Bomb ing on Ge r" '" " Morale-Vol. I & II.
M.d!."1 Branch
65 The Effect o[ Bombing on Health and Medlcul Ca rein Oenllil-ny
MUN1TfONS DIVISION
Heavy Indua!ry Brnnah
66 Tile Ca k.lng I ndustry Report 00 Go.rmanl'67 Coking Plnn\ fuiport No.1, Soe~ion" A, II, C, & D68 GU\choffnll"!l' Ilmelto, Q'be.rh""O<lll, Germa",,·69 Prledr'ich~AI[tcd Huette, Rh~in.btn~se.nj Germany70 Naunklrehen . E iS ( !: lH v' l ar k e A G, Ncunkir chen , Ge.r~
mauy71 Reiehswerke Hermann Goering A G1 Hnllendorf,
G-ernlnny72 Augw.t Thyss "1I Hueute A G, H"",born, Germany73 Friodrich Krupp A G, Burback PI~n~, Esson, der-
m o a n } !74 Dor tmund Hoe rdor HI l. tl c,w er ei. n, I I C, Dc rhnund ,
German)'75 Roesch A G Dor tmund, Ge rr ueny70 Boehume r "Olrein ruer Cuss tn hlJ a:b r;k aUon A G :
Bochil,m, Germany
Molor Vehieles and Tanks Br anch
17 G "rm a" Mo!.or V"l1i cl cs l nd "s" ' )' I IeI,,,r l,78 Tank Indu"(,,' R~rt7 9 Da ir olo r DO,Dz· A G. U nt cr tu rk .b ei ~u ~ G or r1 .l an _y , .80 T\on""l t Motor V"b .; cl es l' IImt ., BUI""L" ,, ,, t, Pu".81 Adam Opel, . T \ussel sna; "" q"nna J1\ _ ~ _
82 DIl j" ,l .r Banz-OnU""au \\t.or1;;5, GIIIl,onall, ~i<)rmuoysa MnsohiMIl[abrik , ,-ugsb"'l!·NuJ'llbo,g, NtlI'nbc"'g,
Co.rmany8 4 A ut .o Uu iol :L A G ! Ch ,e mn i~: ;r ,; a :nd Z",";CkllH , Oermll.u:y
85 H"m;: .hel , .."SOhll , . .Kassol, O()rmun), .SO Muybnch ;V [o i. or WorkS, ])',iedrlob.hafen, Germany87 VoiI\Ma.nd"t, l I'III£Ohi"ell iflb,lk A G, Plonell , Germanys a Volk.w,,~enw<:J"ke, Pnllc,sleboll, Germany80 BLl~[ng NAG Brun."3;wiGk~ aerL~.ilny . ~90 Muohle .n l" ,,, I nd ,, "t1 :, e A G (M, ug l B ," "f \S ",c k, G er -
0. I P ' r ? r ; d ~ ~ hKrupp GrIISPTDw,erko, i r . , lngdebL l1 "g ,Gr . : : ; rnmny
. submarino Branch
92 German Bubmar inc Indus tr y Boport,93 Mns"bin"n[~brik A"g.bu-g-Numherg A G, " - " g > -
bll"g' , C"'-!l1any94 Blohm amIVo611Shll'),arda, Hamburg, COrmAny95 O. utscbcwerkc A G, Kid, G. rrnn " Y96 Deu ts ch e S .I !. iI J \IO ldMeachl nenbnu , B remen, G er -
)!]BUY
07 Fri .edr ic .h Krupp Gerrn .aniO\wern , K ie l, Germany98 Howaldts wer ke A G, Hambur g G.ron n"y99 Submari r, e A", e" ,b l~ · ShelLer , )~I lrge , Germnny
I 00 Bremer Vol k no, VegCSllcIt, C e r ma ny
G rd ne nc e 'B rp ,n c: h
tOI\02
tU3
IO~105106
107I D S
o rdnance Industry Repor tF ri ed ri oh K rupp 0 -usonwe rk e J\ a Magdeburg,
CermanyBochumer Vcreln fucr GUS8t"hlfnbrik"Uon A G,
B n cl iu rn O e )" ]] la _ n_ yHellllc._hOlI & < Soho, K"",oJ, GermanyRhelnmetalt -Borsig, Du sseldorf, GermanyHermann Goerl ng \Verke, Braunschweig, Hal lendorf.
GerrnnnyH l l n .f i ov e r is c b e : M e s e h fu e n bau , Hanover, GermanyGusst ah lfebrt k Fri edri ch KrOlPP, Essen . Germ.nn) '
OIL 'DIVISION
109110
111
011 0\viel Oil , l~innl ReportO il D ivfs ion. , F inal Repor t, AppendixPo.",der, EXP1".S'V<liI ' lSpeciol Rockets 8ndJet Pre>-pall ~D ts, War Oases 6 nd Smok e Anid (M i Dis lew IR epor t # 1)
Unde rgrou nd a nd Dlspers nl PI ",,! .. In Greater Ger -
'1'h~a6~rlDnn Oil Industry, "'linisteri~1 Repor'~ Team
78~.Jinlsterial Repor t on Chemicnls
112
113
114
Oil Brano.h
115 Ammonlukwerke ~I e"",b urg G m b H, Leuna, Ger -m&ll)'-2 AppendioC$
B raunkohl e B en siu I I G, Z elt z u nd Boh le n, O.rmnnrW'"le:rs.hai l A G, LUIltt.kend.orf, Germany
Lud '.i~ fe n-O ppa u -Wurks or r G Farbc"j,.,d u s L r i eA C, Ludwigl ihafen, CerIna.uy
Ruhroel HyO'rogenntioLl Plant, Bottrcp- Bo y, Ger-
many, V01 I, Vol. IIRlleMrus ussng MUI"",loeiwerh A 0, HarburgRefinery, Hamburg, Germany
Rhaun uia Ossa g. M ine raloel werk. A 0, Gr(ljjbro<! kReBDer) , Hamburg , Germany
Rheoani a Ossag Miu . .ral oo lwe,ke A G, Wllh" lmabL"g
Refill.ry, H.atuburg G ermany . •Ce,,"erk..ohnft Victor, C l li lt ro p -R a .l l xe l ., G c rl l l& D Y , Vul.I&: VoL II -
E ll " , paei "oha To" kl. ager l lnd Tr: o. ospo . .t I I G, R"m.bnrg.t G-ermnny -
Eb sL lO A" I ,u n l t Wcrke A G, l I.arburg ReGnery, Ham-bUl"g, Germany
M"""rbeok RheiDpto<W3QIl Syohhatic Oil Plnot-Vol.l&: Vol . n
H6
117
118
119
l~ O
.12!
122
)2-3
12~.
125
Rubb . . , B rauch
126 D~utscho DUl110P GUl l. l. Ii li Co .• H_s.mlu on. ~[.o.iu.
Cermany127 Couulnent io.l Gummiwerk<>. gnnov,, -r, Gel"mm,y12S Hne I . S yn th eti Q Rubbe r P la ntJ29 Nli"l.L"rbl R"por~ on O"r=n Rubber Industry
2 3
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 17/19
Propullunts Braneh
13 0
lal
EI"k trochcm lsehewerke, III" nlch Gorum"'"Soho"",cb.ok E."Plosh·~ Plnn I. l igtl . ,a. .S p ronl!"toffWork" G onb H , B ad So. l, emon Go r tn "ny
Pla"t:o of Ilyn"mit A G Vo=l, Alfre d Nor' ol &; Co,Trolsdon ClfLl ls thnC, Dmrumel !Uld Dunaberg,GorL l l an ) '
D o" ts e b o S Pr il l, g ch er nl e G o n b II, K ""Ihn.g, G .,,,,,,oy
13 2
133
OVER.ALL EGON01l 'I IC EFPECTS DIVISION
134 Over-nil Economic EIf.cts Dlvlslcn Report,
G ro ss N atl ounl . .P ro d,, «t ,, }SPO?C i" " 1'''1'.'''Krieg"""ilb.ri~It\. __ • _ __ . _ whio:h togetherECInean Goe .r lng Works •_ w com prise theF o od fill d A g - r :i c u l tu re ' OJ beve oopOrL
In dustrlal &los au t pu t a nd P ·r od ".til'i~)
PHYSICAL DAMAGE D1VlSION
ECONOM1C STUDIESL8~ D l ! . ltnler-Bcn Zi A G, ~'lilnuoun, G e nn a u yIS5 Sy!1!ha ti o Oil P laut , Me. rb<tok·Bamburg , O .""a l'y186 Cowor'"oIulIt Viator , Cn:ltrop:Rauxel, G""ffia!lY[57 Kleckner : a: "" ,bohlt n,mt., Ulm,. Gormany·ISS nu l l , . . , " ' Hydrogenat ion Plant , Bot tr?p-Boy Gormnny[159 Naukl rehen EiS<!n\verke A G, Nuukt rchen, Geron . ."yJ 00 ruil,. ..y Viaduct a t A lt enb"~k .n , Germ. .."y191 Rai lw . .y V i ad uc t a.t Am.lmrg, Garmany192 De"r. ng-Norng I le fi neri es , Mlsburg , Germany193 Fi"" Raids on C err uan CiUco104 1 -G Faroonindustrie, LudwigshM.", Germa"Y, Vo l I
" " V ol U!O5 Roundhous e i n Mar sh al li ng Yam . U lm , G ermany196 . I G Farbcndustr ie , Leverkusen, Germnn) '197 Ch.mi .oh . .. .W.rkn , Heuls Corman) ,IgS Gromb<:rg M!>J'i; lmll ing Yard, Gremoo,g, Germany199 Loc cmoti ve Shops and B rid ge . a t U ",mm, Ge ,m an )'
Aircraft OI"ls.lo"
15 ' Ih o J al 'n ~" "" A ir or af t J ndus tr yIG Mit",,,b,,,l,, U.a"l:.lud"stries, L!<I.
e or p or/l!ion ft"l,o,t No : I(Mtsub'.·Bhi.r"KOgyo KK)(Ai,frames & EngiM")
17 N<l ku j. lm a A ir er nf , CompMy , L td .Carporafiml Ihl""1 No. II
(N"knjinlll HikoH. KK)
(ALr(,a:m.. & . Engin",,)1S 1(a", ,1O; .h i A ircral t CompanyCDrpo,ul"i<m Re, ," ,! No. I II
(Kl1wn"i.9hi Kokuki Kabushlk; Rai .lon)(Airframes)
10 Kllw"",ak', Aircmft In<iuJ;tti", Compnny, 1 " " .Cor'Pora! ian 11 , .PQr~ N o . .I 7
(I(,,'" usa I< i Iro kuk i Kog)'o Ka,b" ,hi k!1{aiil!Ul.)
(AMramo8 & . "Engiyc~)
20 Alchi AJro,,,,rt Comp'''''YCO'l, .rfl!im,_n. 'pork No. r'
(Ai.hi ltoHuki I{I{)
(Aic['''mos & . EnginCl<)
21 Sumltnmc M~te. l Industr lea, Propell er j ); "i :S ionCarpnratM1l Roporj N». VI
(Smn: it onJ 0 1(1nsoku I{ogyo JOe, P uropornSai.o.hol '
(I'ropoll"",,)22 Hitnch. i A.irarflft Compnny
Corpo,."t io" l~.l'.rlNo . v IfCIIitO-ahi hokuld KK)(.Airfrom,," & EllgiP".l
2 3 J ap an Int er n .. ~i oD lll . Atr Industries, Ltd,Co r po r a t' (m R e p. r l No. ]FIll
(N. ippon Kokusni J{okto 1(0gyo KK)(Ai,.r,,,,,ncs)
2~ J ap an MUI<jc al I n str ument Manuf ao tu ri ng CompanyCo r potation Rc p ort N o, I X
(N;PPOll o . , : k ki &i"o ICK)(P,,,pclln,;;)
25 Taohikawa Air"r !l .r~ Comp"") 'CQr poru! ; on Repor t . 1 \ 1 0 . X
( 'Iacbi bwf> Hil<oki I , KJ(AIrframes)
2ti Fllj i Airl>l<mc Com pun yCorpo ro i iQ" r'.pvrl N o. X l
(Fuji Rlkokf _[(1{)
(Airfr"'ffies)'27 Bho\\ IH .AirphJ.l le Compull j'
Corpcralio" 'R"p'0rt .No. XII(Shown Ibkok, !<ogy<> KK)(A-"fralles)
2 8 T s hl :k u .w n .j il n a. A i r cr a ft Industrles Company , Ltd,
C" ' l I or" t~Qn l?op'or! No. JlllJ, ,.' .
118111awallin" K 0I", I, ogyo h"b""lu k,
Kalsha)Engines)
2g. N ippou Ai rp lo . : n e Co n i p n n yCorpor!';!ian E , , ;pp r !No . XII'
(1 '111'1'0", Hil lok RK)(AirrrlUll0tl)
30 l \: y" .\ 1" Ai"pl ll .no Comp'll1SCO"~o,"tio" 1I01'0rt 11 ' o~Xr
(Ky".hu Hikok KJ()(AirfraDl<lll)
.1\ rllooda Etiglroeerinp; Compo,,),Curp.ro!im' l i a l ' " F r No. X 1'1
(SI><,da Sc,"aklljoj(Compo,,""t;,)
: 12 ' ). oI l~ B . k . u . AitCi.r!).n II I d Ufl~l''iC~COI '1Jr J( "aNm~R t lU ) rt N ( J, Xl~!l
PJl ' . . . .k . a I <oku T{og),o l{nbu.bik; J{nistn)
(O,}ll1 I'one" \ - " l
TRANSPORTATION DlV1SlON
200 The Effe"!" or SLrategic Bombing o:n Gnrmnn T'81l '-pcrtation
R l ii I Op "" ,UO IlB OOQT tho Branner POSl IEJJcots of Bomhmg on 1l:ailiQa.d I ns ta ll a t io ns inRegensburg, N~rDb"rl! and. Mun!oh Di-vision.
Ge rman Lcoomo tt va I ndus tr y Dur in g t he WarGerman M. l1 l tru"y R a il ro lK l T rn - ff i e
33 Ni.... n Auto~obil" Comp_,.nyCo r pu r a ! . o" I I 6'M,j No. X ' " II j
IN;.sa,, Jldosun KK)Engln . . j
34 A, ,, ,y .A 1r A rs en al & . Navl Air ,Depot"C. ' fT o ' a li l ; n R epQF I ' } ;o . X I X
(Ai rf ,ames und Engin es)35 .lapau Airo,af\, Underground
a G Con i a nd Me! .a IB i n J ap "" 'o War "Economy
Capil alGoods , E qu ip tn en l. nd Co~. !r ue li . .n ·D lv is ic n
37 The Jnpnnese Const ruct ion Industry3S Japanese Elect ri ca l E 'l ui pmerot39 Th".J n pn n e se Mac hip e Buildln s In dustry
Elect ri c Power Oiv i-", on
40 '_r ll~ 'Rle c < ri c Pow. r 1"dustry of Jail'" nH The E1e"~rio Pow", 10dustry of .r "1'0.0 (Pinn t M-
ports)
4 2 The J8P~nc" " War ti cr n" S ta nd a,d o f L iv in g and U tiU-z a : t : i o u o f ! 'V 1 .a npc we r
Mililary Supplies Dlvlaien
43 .J"panes" W" r Prnd uet ion Industr ies44 Japan ese N""al Ordnanc e. : 1 5 J ap an es e Army O rdna " ..46 Jnpnnese N a,val Sbipbu Ud'o.g47 Japanese :Vlowr 'vehicle Industry48 JBpan ese Marehnn t Sb ipbuhdin g
a ll an d Cb e mleal D i"'lsi On
40 Chemicals in Jupau's \ , V n ;S O Cl,emio.als in J'M'uJ)'. War-Appendix51 Oil in J ap an 's \1 a e52 Oi l ln J ap "" '. War -Append i"
Over . .all Eeenumic Effects Divislon
5 3 Tho Elf ec;'" of Strategic Bombing all J"Il;"n'. ,I '"arEconomy ( In el ud ln g Append ix A: U . 1 : > . EconomicI nf ell lg eu ce on JnpoD-Annly si • a nd Comparison:,IPl"'lldh: B: Gross National Prcduet on Japanand J]s Cornponents: Appendix C, St .. tistical
SO" rces),
Tru .ns p 01;la ti 0 n D iv is lo n
M The 11'" r i , gnin.t J"I"ll.\OSC Trnllspoctatio,.\, t94J-1945
Urbn:n Areas Divis io!l
55 Eli", ,!" or Air Atlack On Japo"""" Urb<m ECODOID.!
(SUlnma r}' R,oport)55 BiTnet!! of AIr A~tnck On Urea" Coo 'p l"" Tokyo.
Knw ......ki- Yokuhama57 Ef fe cts o f . t\ _irAt """ " on Ibe 01" ', o f NBgDl '' '58 Bff oots of Air Ac""e" 0!1 O""ka-Kobc-Kyoto. 5 \ 1 Etfcol1<of i , - " Att ack on th. e Ct~ l' o [ Nagasak i~O ElJe"w or Air Attn.k On tlon Clt~·Q I Eire.hi",,,
25
201202
20320·)
205206207
20 8
UTlLITlES .DIVISION
C",man EI. "t ,i o UtlUl losl ndustry Repor ."I t o 10 i ll Vol I "Ut il it iC ll<Divl si cn PI8nt Repor ts"U to 20 in Vo l n ''U Lil lt les Division Plant RepOlts"2 1 Rhe ln i • • h c-Wc .t r" li sc he E l. kt, hil .. .e tswe rk A G
Pacific Wl l r
OFFICE OF 'THE C llAIRI IUN
I Summa,y Mport (Pa.ific War)2· Japun '". Struggle to End The Wa r3 Tho Effeots of Atomic Bombs on Hiroshim .. and
NnS)lMld
CIVIL.IAN STUDIES
Clvilia_1lDefense Division
Fie ld ~"p(l rt Cover ing Air Raid " ro tocHOl l und Allkd. S u b J e e t s, To kyo, Japao
5 Fwl d Repo rt CO' ·. ri ng A ir R ai d P ro te cuon and A ll ie dSubia" . .. , Nagasaki , . rapatl
6 Field l_l .cl'ort Covering Air ROlidP.,o!""tioTI and All i!il l. subl ec ts , ~o, to ,. Japan
7 F ,e l d ~~ "poF tCover in g A ir R ai d P ro lectlon and AlUed_s "-0Jcc\s, Kobe, Jnpan
8 l /, el d. l_ l. cpor t Cover ing Alr Raid Pro tect iou and All ied
SubJeot., Os . . k o . , J pauo Field l_l.cpo,' qov".ing A'ir RaId Protectien aud All ied
SubJccts. n " " . W m a , Jl>pnll-No. 1 -10 S"~ry Rcport .Covering Air Raid p·"'~".tioll and
.All ied Sublcots III .1 npmnFmal Ml"'" Covering Air Raid Protootio" undIIIIied 8\1bjM.ts ItoJapan
II
!If.d i ea l D lvMo n
12 T~e Elfe, ot s of Boml) il !g "1 0 RoalOh lind Mildiom!S", ,' _13 '""" tn J.ap(ln . v
The Effccu.. of }~tomk. Bombs 00 BoalLh and MedioolSa,vlo08 U1 R,roshhna and N"I!(l68~i .
Mo.ale Dlvlaion
14 The Elf"" . . o fS l r" ,t eg ic Bombing QnJ" IIU"""" MQml"
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 18/19
·...
00 COO}. C "n
,_ .o00
!2:S oIII
C·:I
8/3/2019 USSBS Report 77, Reduction of Truk
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ussbs-report-77-reduction-of-truk 19/19
_j----+-----+----r---:------r----H4S"
;~ .
.:::::~::::::~.~.'.:..~~~~:=-.~~ :.~''':.,:.t~.
--~-_ - --
, , " , ' : : ~ \ : ,l~ . .
" _. , l "
on. ;h.
•
1 . - 0
< : : : : f ! o i : : . > ",.
10 '4&' TRUK ISLAND GROUP
1I.t. ull.iittlC 'O.... I'NI SUnl'