Overview of diagnosis and management of Dyspepsia in ... · Dyspepsia is an usual offering problem...
Transcript of Overview of diagnosis and management of Dyspepsia in ... · Dyspepsia is an usual offering problem...
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 899 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
Overview of diagnosis and management of Dyspepsia in family medicine
Authors:
Mona Ali Mansour Qahtani, Trad Abdulaziz Alasiri, Dareen Mohammed Ali Alharbi, Mohammed Ali Alshehri,
Bassam Sameer Molawi, Renad Mousa Aljohani
Abstract: This review was aimed to review the evidence discussing the diagnosis and management approaches of Dyspepsia in family medicine in primary care setting. We performed a comprehensive search using electronic databases; MEDLINE, EMBASE, and google scholar, through October, 2017. Search strategies used following MeSH terms in searching via these databases: “Dyspepsia”, “primary care”, “family doctors”, “management”, “diagnosis”. Dyspepsia is an usual offering problem in medical care. There are numerous treatment alternatives available for the management of this condition, and also the decision of which strategy to take depends upon the incidence of esophageal or gastric cancer in the area, patient demographics, patients' level of worry relating to symptoms as well as schedule of endoscopy services. There is no information that plainly suggest the prevalence of one option over the others.
—————————— ——————————
o Introduction:
Each year, an estimated 25% to 30% of the United States population suffers from dyspepsia.
Most self-treat with natural remedy and also non-prescription products, yet others look for
treatment. Dyspepsia make up an estimated 2% to 5% of primary care visit yearly, primarily
by patients that are located to have no natural, or structural, cause for their symptoms
[1,2,3].
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 900 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
Medical diagnosis and also treatment of dyspeptic signs as a whole method is a subject for
an ongoing debate [3,4]. In patients presenting with predominant or regular symptoms of
heartburn, gastroesophageal reflux condition (GERD) is the primary medical diagnosis that
should be taken into consideration until proven otherwise [5] The timing of gastroscopy in
the disease episode has been gone over as well as uncertainty exists about the significance
of the Helicobacter pylori blood test and the breath test. A step-up approach of medication
therapy is prevented a top-down technique [3]. The cost effects of the management of
dyspepsia are massive, as the quantity of acid suppressive drugs suggested is boosting. In
particular, making use of acid reductions treatment is raising quickly, specifically for the so-
called 'various other dyspeptic conditions [2,5].
For that reason, dyspepsia has been subcatagorized right into a number of teams such as
ulcer-like, reflux-like, nonspecific as well as dysmotility-like dyspepsia1 as well as therapy
guided on the basis of the patient's most predominant symptom. Signs and symptom
subgrouping alone, however, could not dependably differentiate patients with underlying PUD
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 901 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
or other natural disease from patients with practical dyspepsia as well as has actually not
been located to be useful in determining therapy alternatives [5,6].
This review was aimed to review the evidence discussing the diagnosis and management
approaches of Dyspepsia in family medicine in primary care setting.
o Methodology:
We performed a comprehensive search using electronic databases; MEDLINE, EMBASE,
and google scholar, through October, 2017. Search strategies used following MeSH terms in
searching via these databases: “Dyspepsia”, “primary care”, “family doctors”, “management”,
“diagnosis”. More articles were found in references lists scanned of included auricles.
o Discussion:
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 902 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
The best approach to the management of dyspepsia continues to be debatable. Management
needs to be individualized and think about factors such as the precision of readily available
noninvasive diagnostic tests, the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in the area, the
access and also price of endoscopy, the threats vs. advantages to the patient, as well as the
patient's reputation of a provided technique.
Diagnosis:
• Pathophysiological mechanism for functional dyspepsia (FD):
There is no solitary pathophysiological device for FD. Several pathological procedures happen
alone or in mix. Pathophysiology of FD continues to be a confusing location to discuss.
Extreme acid secretion was thought to be a number of but responsible studies have failed to
demonstrate an enhanced basal or peak acid secretion [7,8]. One study nevertheless has revealed
an increase in acid secretion in reaction to intravenous gastrin launching peptide in dyspeptic
patients that were Helicobacter pylori favorable [9]. Moreover, if signs were due to acid,
powerful acid reductions would lead to alleviation of signs and symptoms. Sign reaction to acid
reductions in useful dyspeptic patients has actually been suboptimal. There is no proof that
straight instillation of acid into the stomach prompt symptoms [10].
The relationship between H. pylori as well as functional dyspepsia continues to be rare [11]. H.
pylori has actually not been consistently shown to be more prevalent in dyspeptic patients
compared to normal controls. No regular H. pylori details symptomatology has been described
and no particular underlying pathophysiological system has actually been recognized. Reaction
to therapy tests of H. pylori have not continually resulted in boosted signs and symptoms. It is
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 903 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
likely that H. pylori may be responsible for signs in a subset of patients as well as eliminating the
bacterium in these patients would lead to marked amelioration of signs. Gastric mobility
problems have been explained in as much as 50% of patients with practical dyspepsia [12,13].
Delayed gastric emptying has actually been most frequently examined as well as has been shown
to be very common. The connection of signs and symptoms and motility problems has actually
not been regular.
There has been recent interest in the duty of natural hypersensitivity. Concerning half of all
patients with practical dyspepsia have abdominal discomfort in reaction to gastric balloon
distension as well as at reduced stress compared to healthy and balanced controls [14]. The
mechanisms as to just how patients develop gastric understanding abnormalities are uncertain. If
main or spine handling pathways are abnormal in patients with useful dyspepsia, gastric reflex
relaxation or accommodation has actually been revealed to be impaired but it is unclear.
Psychological aspects consisting of personality type as well as psychiatric problems in functional
dyspepsia stay vague. Whether psychological disease is a cause or an outcome of chronic
functional dyspepsia and also whether specific personality traits incline a person to establish
chronic signs are uncertain [12,14]. Researches accomplished so far have actually focused on
consulters; it may be that underlying emotional factors or personality disorders drive patients to
seek clinical help for dyspepsia. The duty of stress in provoking signs and symptoms is likewise
unclear. Dyspeptic patients have an even more adverse perception of life occasions. This could
of course be a result of chronic disease compared to a reason for the dyspepsia [15,16].
The duty of numerous foods additionally stays questionable particularly in Asia. There is
widespread idea that chili consisting of foods as an example would certainly prompt signs. This
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 904 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
has actually not been proven. It seems affordable that patients must prevent foods that are known
to prompt dyspepsia and this can differ from patient to patient. On the other hand, several
patients report an aggravation of signs and symptoms when they miss out on dishes. Extreme
usage of food at one dish has actually also been reported to create symptoms as have intake of
details foods particularly spicy or "oily" foods. Coffee, smoking as well as alcohol consumption
have not been clearly shown to be connected with dyspepsia [16]. Non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory medicines specifically in greater dosages have actually been shown to cause
dyspepsia [16] Many medicines, including metformin as well as different anti-biotics, have been
thought to cause dyspepsia although the mechanism of symptom generation is unclear (Table 1).
Table1. Medications that can cause dyspepsia
• Acarbose • Alendronate (Fosamax) • Antibiotics (e.g. erythromycin, metronidazole) • Aspirin • Herbal remedies • Iron • Metformin • NSAIDs • Orlistat • Potassium chloride • Theophylline • Vitamins
• History and endoscopy for diagnosis of dyspepsia
The patient history should analyze the top quality, period and also seriousness of signs and
symptoms, along with the visibility of other associated signs. A listing of current drugs,
particularly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs), over the counter medications
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 905 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
as well as natural treatments should be accumulated. A family history of PUD, alcohol usage and
psychological or psychosocial disorders must be kept in mind.
Endoscopy is recommended in patients with dyspepsia who have alarm symptoms symptomatic
of possibly major hidden conditions such as PUD, gastric/esophageal cancer and also other
unusual upper stomach (GI) diseases (Table 2) [17] New start dyspepsia in any patient older than
55 years of age likewise calls for endoscopy due to the higher incidence of gastric cancer
discovered in patients with progressing age [17].
Table 2: Alarm symptoms in dyspepsia necessitating evaluation for peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal
malignancy.
Alarm symptoms in dyspepsia* Age >55 years Gastrointestinal bleeding Anemia Palpable abdominal mass Progressive dysphagia Early satiety Anorexia Odynophagia Persistent vomiting Previous documented peptic ulcer Previous gastric surgery or malignancy Family history of gastrointestinal cancer Unexplained weight loss (>10% of body weight) Lymphadenopathy
Studies from open-access endoscopy practices and also outpatient collection show that just a
couple of patients with dyspepsia, in fact, have PUD, reflux esophagitis as well as gastric cancer,
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 906 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
particularly in western populaces [18,19]. In a series of 228 cases of verified top GI cancers cells
that originally provided with uncomplicated dyspepsia symptoms, Sundar et at. [20] recognized 5
patients with dyspepsia and no alarm signs that had resectable top GI hatreds. They concluded
that endoscopic investigation was not helpful in detecting cancer at an onset.
Phull el at. [21] carried out a retrospective study in Scotland to evaluate the threat of missing a
top GI malignancy if the limit for immediate endoscopy in straightforward dyspepsia was
boosted from 45 to 55 years old. Of the 3,293 patients diagnosed with upper GI cancer, just 290
(8.8%) were <55 years and also only 21 of these 290 (0.6% of all patients) had no alarm signs
and symptoms. They ended that top GI malignancy is unusual before 55 years of age and also the
majority of the patients consequently found to have a malignancy provided with alarm system
signs. They noted that boosting the age of endoscopy from 45 to 55 years old would certainly not
negatively impact the diagnosis of upper GI hatred [21].
Most patients going through endoscopy are diagnosed as having nonulcerative dyspepsia. Hence,
it is essential to determine noninvasive tests with high sensitivity, specificity and also
unfavorable predictive value that can be utilized to exclude patients without underlying
pathological problems [21].
o Testing for H. pylori:
H. pylori infection is a major danger factor for PUD, particularly when making use of NSAIDs
has actually been omitted. The reasoning for H. pylori testing is to identify those patients with
dyspepsia who have underlying PUD. Although many patients with H. pylori infection do not
establish PUD, as numerous as 95% of patients with duodenal ulcers as well as 80% with gastric
abscess have an H. pylori infection [22].
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 907 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
The occurrence of H. pylori differs in the different populace. Greater prices are discovered in
populaces with reduced social financial status. In established nations, the frequency is higher in
the immigrant populace. Making use of serologic screening, the prevalence in the United States
was 9.4% in submarine workers, 26.2% in non-Hispanic Caucasians, 52.7% amongst non-
Hispanic African Americans as well as 61.6% in Mexican Americans [22,23]. In the province of
Ourense, Spain, the frequency rate of H. pylori infection was approximately 69% in the basic
grown-up populace and in the Czech Republic, it was roughly 41% [24,25].
• Serologic Testing & urea breath test (UBT):
Serologic testing is an indirect examination for H. pylori infection that discovers IgG or IgA
antibodies to H. pylori and has variable uniqueness. It is an economical device, particularly in
populaces where the occurrence of H. pylori is high. However, it might cause the over-treatment
of patients because of the high rate of false-positive test results [26]. Loy as well as colleagues
[27] carried out a meta-analysis of 21 studies of various industrial sets for H. pylori serology and
located an overall sensitivity of 85% and also specificity of 79%. IgG antibodies are likely to
remain raised months after treatment for H. pylori infection. Thus, serologic testing for H. pylori
is not likely to be really useful for determining whether earlier obliteration therapy succeeded
[26].
The urea breath test (UBT) and also the stool antigen test are the most precise noninvasive
indirect analysis tests for H. pylori infection and also are recommended specifically in low
occurrence populaces [28,29] Unlike serological tests that are just pens for direct exposure to H.
pylori and do not set apart existing from previous infection, the UBT as well as the feces antigen
test detect energetic infection. According to the American College of Gastroenterology
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 908 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
guidelines, the UBT is the very best nonendoscopic examination for recording H. pyloriinfection
[29].
• Management of dyspepsia
Management can be divided broadly into non-drug measures and specific drug therapy.
Non-drug measures
Patients with dyspepsia consult physicians for relief of their signs in addition to look for
reassurance that they do not experience a significant ailment such as cancer. Time and effort
have to be spent by the doctor on a clear description as well as a company reassurance to the
patient. The finding of a typical endoscopy is frequently useful in easing a patient's anxiousness.
Time must likewise be invested to discover any psychosocial issues as well as steps required to
remedy them where feasible. Dietary and also way of living modifications need to be advised
where suitable. Reasonable advice regarding timing of dishes and also evasion of particular
"aggravating" foods ought to be made. Yet care ought to be taken not to go "too far" with
recommendations on avoidance of foods because food aversion is highly individualised.
Cessation of cigarette smoking as well as moderation of alcohol consumption might be handy
and also are in any case, excellent general medical recommendations. Reduction of stress and
anxiety especially at the work environment and also adequate rest as well as sleep might be very
important in the amelioration of symptoms and also/ or in helping patients handle their
discomfort.
Specific drug treatment:
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 909 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
Many patients expect or perhaps demand particular drug therapy. This is especially so in Asia
where patients usually regarded doctors as being much better if they recommend a lot more
drugs. A huge part of the effectiveness of these medicines could be because of a sugar pill
impact. In functional dyspepsia, sugar pill response rates of as much as 40% have been reported
[30].
Treatment is suggested on what doctors perceived as the possible underlying device of useful
dyspepsia. It is reasonable to suggest antacids as well as acid-suppressing drugs for ulcer-like
symptoms. In an organized analysis of published research studies, H2 antagonists have been
revealed to be more reliable compared to sugar pill. However, many studies are of weak style
and results remain in actual reality difficult to interpret. Proton pump inhibitors have additionally
been examined in FD. In the only Asian research study, no improvement in between PPI therapy
compared to sugar pill was kept in mind [31]. In other studies carried out in Western patients,
potential misclassification of patients with GERD might have given a favorable response as
compared to placebo [32,33]. In the study by Talley et al. [33] enhancement in signs and
symptoms were found in patients with ulcer and reflux-like signs and symptoms. No renovation
was seen in patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia.
Prokinetic agents impact motility of the GIT by advertising and also coordinating peristalsis
throughout the entire GIT. Most experts would recommend this agent when patients suffer
bloating unwanted gas or stomach distension as the main signs and symptoms. Many clinical
trials on prokinetic representatives have been performed however lots of deal with little example
dimension. Results from this individual studies show a valuable result compared with sugar pill
and also this is validated in a methodical analysis of the published information [34] Most of these
research studies have utilized cisapride as the prokinetic agent. Nevertheless, this medication is
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 910 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
no longer available for usage in many nations. More recent representatives have currently been
introduced including itopride hydrochloride which has actually shown great cause one
worldwide multinational study [35]. Various other prokinetic agents which are likewise used
include metoclopramide and also domperidone yet these agents have central worried side-effects
which are not present with cisapride or itopride. In an earlier meta-analysis, domperidone has
actually been shown to have a useful effect on practical dyspepsia compared with placebo. Since
of its sedative side-effects is mainly made use of for anti-emesis in scientific technique,
metoclopramide.
Other representatives have also been tried as well as they include kappa receptor antagonists and
various other novel representatives targeting at visceral hypersensitivity. None have however
been utilized with the appropriate appeal. It could be reasonable to attempt one more course of
medications if treatment falls short with one representative. Generally, co-prescription with both
types of medicines is not recommended. Patients look for relief from their symptoms and also
eventually, treatment of FD is empirical [35].
o Conclusion:
Dyspepsia is an usual offering problem in medical care. There are numerous treatment
alternatives available for the management of this condition, and also the decision of which
strategy to take depends upon the incidence of esophageal or gastric cancer in the area, patient
demographics, patients' level of worry relating to symptoms as well as schedule of endoscopy
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 911 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
services. There is no information that plainly suggest the prevalence of one option over the
others.
o References:
1. Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Malekzadeh R, Sotoudeh M, et al. Lower esophagus in
dyspeptic Iranian patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003; 18: 315 21.
2. Sotoudehmanesh R, Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Shirazian N, et al. Prevalence of
endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux disease in a 6-year
period. Endoscopy. 2000; 32: 33.
3. El-Serag H.B., Talley N.J. (2004) Systemic review: the prevalence and clinical
course of functional dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19: 643–654
4. Jones RH. Primary care research and clinical practice: gastroenterology. Postgrad
Med J. 2008;84:454–458.
5. Talley NJ, Vakil N; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of
Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of dyspepsia. Am J
Gastroenterol 2005;100:2324–2337.
6. Thomson AB, Barkun AN, Armstrong D, Chiba N, White RJ, Daniels S, Escobedo S,
Chakraborty B, Sinclair P, Van Zanten SJ. The prevalence of clinically significant
endoscopic findings in primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia: the
Canadian Adult Dyspepsia Empiric Treatment - Prompt Endoscopy (CADET-PE)
study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:1481–1491.
7. Gotthard R. Aspects on gastric acid, bile acid and treatment in patients with peptic
ulcer disease and dyspepsia of unknown origin [Thesis]. Linkoping University Medical
Dissertations No. 261, Linkoping, 1987.
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 912 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
8. Collen MJ, Loebenberg MJ. Basal gastric acid secretion in non-ulcer dyspepsia with
or without duodenitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34((2)):246–50.
9. El-Omar E, Penman I, Ardill JE, McColl KE. A substantial proportion of non-ulcer
dyspepsia patients have the same abnormality of secretion as duodenal ulcer
patients. Gut. 1995;36((4)):534–8.
10. George AA, Tsuchiyose M, Dooley CP. Sensitivity of the gastric mucosa to acid and
duodenal contents in patients with non-ulcer
dyspepsia. Gastroenterology. 1991;101((1)):3–6.
11. Moayyedi P, Soo S, Deeks J. et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer
dyspepsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19.
12. Stanghellini V, Ghidini G, Maccarini M. et al. Fasting and postprandial gastrointestinal
motility in ulcer and nonulcer dyspepsia. Gut. 1992;33((2)):184–90.
13. Cuomo R, Sarnelli G, Grasso R. et al. Functional dyspepsia symptoms, gastric
emptying and satiety provocation test: Analysis of relationships. Scand J
Gastroenterol. 2001;36((10)):1030–6.
14. Quigley EMM. Motility, heartburn and dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther. 1997;11(Suppl 2):41–50.
15. Haug TT, Wilhelmsen I, Berstad A, Ursin H. Life events and stress in patients with functional dyspepsia compared with patients with duodenal ulcer and healthy controls. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30((6)):524–30.
16. Richter JE. Stress and psychological and environmental factors in functional dyspepsia. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1991;182:40–6.
17. Talley NJ, Zinsmeister AR, Schleck CD, Melton LJ 3rd. Dyspepsia and dyspepsia subgroups: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 1992;102(4 Pt 1):1259–1268.
18. Voutilainen M, Mantynen T, Kunnamo I, Juhola M, Mecklin JP, Farkkila M. Impact of clinical symptoms and referral volume on endoscopy for detecting peptic ulcer and gastric neoplasms. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003;38:109–113.
19. Westbrook JI, Talley NJ. Diagnostic investigation rates and use of prescription and non-prescription medications amongst dyspeptics: a population-based study of 2300 Australians. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2003;17:1171–1178.
20. Sundar N, Muraleedharan V, Pandit J, Green JT, Crimmins R, Swift GL. Does endoscopy diagnose early gastrointestinal cancer in patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia? Postgrad Med J 2006;82:52–54.
IJSER
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017 913 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2017 http://www.ijser.org
21. Phull PS, Salmon CA, Park KG, Rapson T, Thompson AM, Gilbert FJ. Age threshold for endoscopy and risk of missing upper gastrointestinal malignancy—data from the Scottish audit of gastric and oesophageal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23:229–233.
22. Jackman RP, Schlichting C, Carr W, Dubois A. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in United States Navy submarine crews. Epidemiol Infect 2006;134:460–464.
23. Everhart JE, Kruszon-Moran D, Perez-Perez GI, Tralka TS, McQuillan G. Seroprevalence and ethnic differences in Helicobacter pylori infection among adults in the United States. J Infect Dis 2000;181:1359–1363.
24. Macenlle Garcia R, Gayoso Diz P, Sueiro Benavides RA, Fernandez Seara J. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in the general adult population of the province of Ourense. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2006;98:241–248.
25. Bures J, Kopacova M, Koupil I, Vorisek V, Rejchrt S, Beranek M, Seifert B, Pozler O, Zivny P, Douda T, Kolesarova M, Pinter M, Palicka V, Holcik J; European Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in the Czech Republic. Helicobacter 2006;11:56–65.
26. Ho B, Marshall BJ. Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Serologic testing. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2000;29:853–862.
27. Loy CT, Irwig LM, Katelaris PH, Talley NJ. Do commercial serological kits for Helicobacter pyloriinfection differ in accuracy? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1138–1144.
28. Thijs JC, van Zwet AA, Thijs WJ, Oey HB, Karrenbeld A, Stellaard F, Luijt DS, Meyer BC, Kleibeuker JH. Diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori: a prospective evaluation of their accuracy, without selecting a single test as the gold standard. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:2125–2129.
29. Gatta L, Ricci C, Tampieri A, Vaira D. Non-invasive techniques for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003;9:489–496.
30. Thompson WG. Placebos: a review of the placebo response. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95((7)):1637–43.
31. Wong WM, Wong BC, Hung WK. et al. Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study of four weeks of lansoprazole for the treatment of functional dyspepsia in Chinese patients. Gut. 2002;51((4)):502–6.
32. Talley NJ, Meineche-Schmidt V, Pare P. et al. Efficacy of omeprazole in functional dyspepsia: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (the Bond and Opera studies) Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12((11)):1055–65.
33. van Zanten SV, Armstrong D, Chiba N. et al. Esomeprazole 40 mg once a day in patients with functional dyspepsia: the randomized, placebo-controlled “ENTER” trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101((9)):2096–106.
34. Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ, Jones MJ, Verlinden M, Talley NJ. Efficacy of cisapride and domperidone in functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96((3)):689–96.
35. Holtmann G, Talley NJ, Liebregts T, Adam B, Parow C. A placebo-controlled trial of itopride in functional dyspepsia. N Engl J Med. 2006;354((8)):832–40.
36.
IJSER