Download - Government 2.0

Transcript
Page 1: Government 2.0

Government 2.0From Community Participation to Co-creation

1

Mark Kuznicki, Remarkk! ConsultingSean Howard, Lift Communications

Page 2: Government 2.0

Toronto Transit Camp“Not a complaints department,

a solutions playground”Passion and fun meet practice

Diverse communities of interest and practice

Cultural change

Facilitating community formation

Modelling for replication

Harvard Business Review: “Breakthrough Ideas 2008”

2

Page 3: Government 2.0

A Challenging Time for Leaders

Accelerating pace of change vs. industrial age planning time-scales

De-industrialization and economic transformation

Continued rising energy prices

Climate change

Unforeseen economic crises and external shocks

3

Demand for INGENUITY, CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, FORESIGHT, INSIGHT

Page 4: Government 2.0

Open Innovation Systems

The best ideas do not come from within any one organization, recognized by P&G, IBM and many others

Black Swan ideas always come from unexpected and unplanned places1

How do we design systems for innovation?

OPEN INNOVATION => RESILIENT & SUSTAINABLE PLACES?

4

1 “The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable”, Nassim Nicholas Taleb (2007)

Page 5: Government 2.0

5

Case Study: The MetronautsContext: Metrolinx (Greater Toronto Transportation Authority), agency developing a Regional Transportation Plan for GTHA

Challenge: Recognition that the current public consultation process (mandated) is broken (us and them). Desire an ability to engage the public and generate insights and collaboration.

Approach: Apply the open sourced Transit Camp model to a real-world planning and policy innovation opportunity

Audience: Find the most passionate 1% of citizens and engage them deeply not just with the organization, but with each other

Design: Create “third spaces” -> unconference events and an online community

Page 6: Government 2.0

Richard Florida’s Creative ClassArts

Architecture & Design

Entertainment & Media

Science & Engineering

paid to create

share a “creative ethos”

are attracted to “creative habitats”

driving future prosperity

6

Page 7: Government 2.0

Cultural Creative Values

7

heterarchy: horizontal power & control

reject the materialist notion of success

self-actualizing, integrated and balanced life

believe in authenticity, emphasize relationships

prefer intimate, visceral & engaged learning

idealism, activism, globalism and ecology

believe that a little creative chaos is a good thing

Source: Ray & Anderson (2000), “The Cultural Creatives”

Page 8: Government 2.0

Virtual communitymeets physical place.

8

Page 9: Government 2.0

9

How do we create space

for play?

Text

City Repair Project, Portland

Page 10: Government 2.0

10

Page 11: Government 2.0

Goals & Expectations

Key Success Criteria: Engagement & Insight

Citizens who are informed and creatively engaged in the Metrolinx RTP process

Tangible artifacts to provide input and insight into the Metrolinx RTP process

Extend and connect the passionate Transit Camp community to the organization and to each other across the vast city-region

11

Page 12: Government 2.0

Project Phases

Participatory Research & Engagement

Draft Regional Transportation Plan

Activation Phase

Broad community engagement focused on RTP

Post Engagement

Assessment of outcomes & opportunities for ongoing engagement

12

Participatory Research & Engagement

Activation Phase Post Engagement

July ‘08 Sep/Oct ‘08

Page 13: Government 2.0

Gathering Insights

Explicit: Specific ideas and solutions offered by informed and engaged citizens

Tacit: Insights derived from observing the interactions and conversations of informed, engaged and enabled

Latent: Needs that are not known until they are seen for the first time

13

ETHNOGRAPHIC research opportunities

Page 14: Government 2.0

Metronauts Unconferences

14

Page 15: Government 2.0

15

Page 16: Government 2.0

16

Page 17: Government 2.0

Value Received to DateInnovative and unexpected ideas that would never surface in any traditional public consultation approach

People involved feed engaged together in the process

Successfully shifted dialogue to solutions frame, avoided railroading by pet issues advocates or “the usual suspects”

Grew awareness of Metrolinx RTP process across the region

Metronauts Ground Crew - a volunteer guerilla marketing squad

Created a safe place for Metrolinx to learn and experiment with new tools and methods

Emerging themes:

Expected - transit planning (routes, rolling stock, headway) & engineering focus

Unexpected - traveller experience, interactions, human-centric design focus

17

Page 18: Government 2.0

Lessons Learned to Date

Integrate community engagement with communications strategies and planning processes

Building an online community is only one element of a multi-faceted online engagement approach; need to engage where people are today

Community evangelist is a key competency that must be developed, enabled and supported

Community is drawn to the legitimate centre of power and influence, which needs to pay back with trust and transparency to enhance legitimacy

18

Page 19: Government 2.0

19

Engagement Pyramid

Page 20: Government 2.0

20

Going where our audience is

Finding related communities of interest

Creating experiences across touchpoints

Enabling and repacking content so that is both pertinent to platform and a match with audience interests and passions

Contextual Touchpoints

Page 21: Government 2.0

21

Simple (cause and effect -> best practices)

Sense, Categorize, Respond

Complicated (complex but understandable r/ships)

Sense, Analyze, Respond

Complex (in retrospect)

Probe, Sense, Respond

Chaotic (discovery)

Act, Sense, Respond

The Cynefin Model

Page 22: Government 2.0

22

“Someone devoted to building a critical mass of support for a service, technology or community”

Providing value to the conversation

A Metrolinx staff member that is transparent in their role as evangelist

Interacting daily with community through a variety of technologies, platforms and places

Shares a passion for the subject matter with the community, depth of understanding, solid relationships within the organization, articulate and empathy

Requires: Time, Authority, Legitimacy

Community Evangelist Role

Page 23: Government 2.0

Signals of a Participatory Future

The Social Web (aka “Web 2.0”):

the web as a platform for participation

Rise of the Creative Class, Cultural Creative Values, Millennial Generation

pools of talent waiting to be engaged

The “Obama Moment”:

the first transformational political leader of the web age

23

Page 24: Government 2.0

The “Obama Moment”

24

First Transformational Leader of the Web Age

Embraces social movements self-organizing on the web, youth, crowd-sourcing, small donations

Enables participation of people who have felt outside the political process - more than inspiring speeches

E.g. “virtual call centers”, personal blogs, self organizing street parties

User-generated content driven by participatory values consistent with his message:

“We Are the Change We Are Waiting For”

Page 25: Government 2.0

25

Page 26: Government 2.0

Government 2.0?

Professionalization

Industrial Age & Modernist Values

Public Consultation

Risk Aversion & Management

Control of Information

Control of Complicated Systems

Planning-Centric

Efficiency of Service Delivery

Rise of the Pro-Ams

Imagination Age & Creative Values

Public Engagement & Participation

Risk-Taking & Innovation

Push Information to the Edges

Adaptation to Complexity

Human-Centric

Perceived Value of Outcomes

26

Traditional Planning Paradigm Emerging Participatory Paradigm