Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young...

24
Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014

Transcript of Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young...

Page 1: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children

Oklahoma CityOctober 15, 2014

Page 2: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Less than high school

High school diploma or equivalent

Postsecondary non-degree award

Associate's degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree or higher

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

Average annual percent change

U.S. Job Growth by Typical EducationRequired for Job Entry, 2012 to 2022

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections Program

Page 3: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Less than high school

High school diploma or equivalent

Postsecondary non-degree award

Associate's degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree or higher

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000

Average Annual Wage by Typical Education Required for Job Entry, 2012*

*Average of median wages by occupation, weighted by employment size.Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections Program

Page 4: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children

• First few years have life-long impact

• Early investments yield a high public return

• Key investments: Home visiting, preschool, quality child care, parent education and health care

Page 5: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children

• First few years have life-long impact

• Early investments yield a high public return

• Key investments: Home visiting, preschool, quality child care, parent education and health care

Page 6: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Human Brain DevelopmentSynapse Formation Dependent on Early Experiences

FIRST YEAR

-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Birth (Months) (Years)

Sensory Pathways(Vision, Hearing)

LanguageHigher Cognitive Function

Source: Nelson (2000)

Page 7: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Human Brain at Birth 6 Years Old 14 Years Old

Source: Chugani, Phelps & Mazziotta (1987)

Page 8: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Barriers to Social Mobility Emerge at a Very Young Age

16 mos. 24 mos. 36 mos.

Cu

mu

lati

ve V

ocab

ula

ry (

Word

s)

College Educated Parents

Very Low-Income Parents

Child’s Age (Months)

200

600

1200

Source: Hart & Risley (1995)

Page 9: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Risk Factors for Adult Heart Disease are Embedded in Adverse Childhood Experiences

ACEs

Od

ds R

ati

o

0 1 2 3 4 5,6 7,8

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Source: Dong, Giles, Felitti, Dube, Williams, Chapman, & Anda (2004)

Page 10: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children

• First few years have life-long impact

• Early investments yield a high public return

• Key investments: Home visiting, preschool, quality child care, parent education and health care

Page 11: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

High/Scope Study of Perry Preschool

• In early 1960s, 123 children from low-income families in Ypsilanti, Mich.

• Children randomly selected to attend Perry or control group.

• High-quality program with well-trained teachers, daily classroom sessions and weekly home visits.

• Tracked participants and control group through age 40.

Page 12: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Perry: Educational Effects

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Didn't require special education

Graduated from high school on time

Age 14 achievement at 10th percentile+

Program group No-program group

Source: Schweinhart, et al. (2005)

Page 13: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Perry: Economic Effects at Age 40

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Have a savingsaccount

Earn $27,000+

Own home

Program group No-program group

Source: Schweinhart, et al. (2005)

Page 14: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Perry: Arrested 5 or More Times Before Age 40

Source: Schweinhart, et al. (2005)

0% 20% 40% 60%

No-program group

Program group

Page 15: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Perry PreschoolCosts and Benefits Over 62 Years

-$20

,000

$20,

000

$60,

000

$100

,000

$140

,000

Welfare Payments

Crime Victims

Justice System

Higher Participants' Earnings

K-12 Ed

Program Cost

For Public For Participant

Source: Schweinhart, et al. (2005)

Page 16: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Perry Preschool — Estimated Return on Investment

• Benefit-Cost Ratio = $16 to $1

• Annual Rate of Return = 18%

• Public Rate of Return = 16%

• Heckman Reanalysis = 10%

Sources: Schweinhart, et al. (2005); Author’s calculations; Heckman, Moon, Pinto, Savelyez, & Yavitz (2010)

Page 17: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Benefit-Cost Ratios for Other Longitudinal Studies

• Abecedarian Educational Child Care – $4 to $1

• Chicago-Child Parent– $10 to $1

• Elmira Prenatal/Early Infancy Project – $5 to $1

Sources: Masse & Barnett (2002); Reynolds, Temple, White, Ou, & Robertson (2011); Karoly, et al (1998)    

Page 18: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Short-Run Benefits to Businesses

• Allow parents to enter workforce

• Reduce absenteeism and turnover

• Stronger local schools

Page 19: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Lessons Learned from Research

• Invest in quality

• Involve parents

• Start early

• Reach at-risk population

• Bring to scale

Page 20: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Key Investments

• Home visiting

• Preschool

• Quality child care

• Parent education

• Health care

Page 21: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.
Page 22: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Sources

Carneiro, P. and Ginja, R. (2009). "Preventing Behavior Problems in Childhood and Adolescence: Evidence from Head Start." University College London.

Chugani, H.T., Phelps, M.E., & Mazziotta, J.C. (1987). Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development. Annals of Neurology 22, 487-497.

Currie, J. and Thomas, D. (2000). "School Quality and The Longer-Term Effects Of Head Start," Journal of Human Resources 35:4, 755-774.

Deming, D. (2009). "Early Childhood Intervention and Life-Cycle Skill Development: Evidence from Head Start." American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1:3, 111–134.

Dong, M., Giles, W., Felitti, V.J., Dube, S.R., Williams, J.E., Chapman, D.P., & Anda, R.F. (2004). “Insights into causal pathways for ischemic heart disease: Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.” Circulation 110, 1761–1766.

Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.

Heckman, J.J. & Masterov, D.V. (2007). "The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children," Review of Agricultural Economics, American Agricultural Economics Association 29(3), 446-493, 09.

Heckman, J. J., Moon, S.H., Pinto, R., Savelyez, P., & Yavitz, A. (2010) .“The Rate of Return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program.” Journal of Public Economics 94(1-2), 114-28.

Hustedt , J.T., Barnett, W.S., Jung, K. & Friedman, A.H. (2010). The New Mexico PreK Evaluation: Impacts From the Fourth Year (2008-2009) of New Mexico’s State-Funded PreK Program. National Institute for Early Education Research.

Karoly, L.A., Greenwood, P.W., Everingham, S.S., Hoube, J., Kilburn, M.R., Rydell et al. (1998). Investing in Our Children: What We Know and Don’t Know About the Costs and Benefits of Early Childhood Interventions. Santa Monica, Cal.: RAND Corporation. Masse, L.N., & Barnett, W.S. (2002). A Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Abecedarian Early Childhood Intervention. New Brunswick, N.J.: National Institute for Early Education Research. 

  

Page 23: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

Sources

  

Puma, M., Bell, S., Cook, R. Heid, C., Broene, P. Jenkins, F., Mashburn, A. and Downer, J. (2012). Third Grade Follow-up to the Head Start Impact Study Final Report, Executive Summary. OPRE Report # 2012-45b. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Reynolds, A.J., Temple, J.A., Robertson, D.L., & Mann, E.A. (2002). “Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 4(24), 267-303. Schweinhart, L.J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W.S., Belfield, C.R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime Effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study Through Age 40. Ypsilanti, Mich.: High-Scope Press. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Population Projections. http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections Program. http://www.bls.gov/emp/.

Wong, V. C., Cook, T. D., Barnett, W. S., & Jung, K. (2008). “An Effectiveness-based Evaluation of Five State Prekindergarten Programs. “Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(1), 122-154.

Page 24: Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis The Economic Case for Investments in Young Children Oklahoma City October 15, 2014.

minneapolisfed.org