Chapter 8: Trait Aspects of Personality This multimedia product and its contents are protected under...
-
Upload
theodore-webster -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Chapter 8: Trait Aspects of Personality This multimedia product and its contents are protected under...
Chapter 8:
Trait Aspects of Personality
This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: (1) Any public performance or display, including transmission of any image over a network; (2) Preparation of any derivative work, including the extraction, in whole or in part, of any images; (3) Any rental, lease, or lending of the program.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
History of Trait Approaches
Sanguine (blood) Hopeful and cheerful
Melancholic (black bile) Sad and depressive
Choleric (yellow bile) Angry and irascible
Phlegmatic (phlegm) Slow and apathetic
• Hippocrates' bodily humors
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
History of Trait Approaches
Character descriptions◦ Theophrastus’ “Penurious Man” (over 2000
years ago)Charles Darwin
◦ Individual differences are a topic for scientific study
◦ Individual differences can arise through evolutionary processes
Francis Galton◦ Measurement of human abilities-Intelligence
testingCopyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Beginnings of the Modern Trait Approach—Carl Jung
Typology◦Small number of “types”◦Each person fits one “type” best
8 Types (4 functions x 2 attitudes)Functions: Sensing, Thinking, Feeling,
IntuitingAttitudes: Extroversion, IntroversionMyers-Briggs Type Indicator
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Raymond B. CattellUsed (and refined) factor analysis
◦data-driven, not theory-driven ◦reduced many different traits to sixteen
trait clustersSixteen Personality Factors
Questionnaire (16PF)Collected many different types of data
◦Q-data◦T-data◦L-data
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Gordon AllportPersonality:
◦“The dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his characteristic behavior and thought”
Each person has unique qualitiesPhilosophical, humanistic,
scholarly approach
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Gordon AllportRegularities in behavior arise
because◦The individual views many situations
and stimuli in the same way◦Many of the individual’s behaviors
are similar in their meaning Functionally equivalent
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Gordon AllportCommon Traits
◦Due to biological heritage and shared culture, there are some common traits
◦e.g., dominance in American culture
Proprium◦The core of personality
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Gordon AllportIdiographic methods
◦ Take into account each person’s uniqueness Dairies, interviews, Q-sorts, etc.
◦ Compensate for the limitations of nomothetic methods
Personal dispositions◦ Goals, motives, or styles◦ Cardinal dispositions (ruling passions)◦ Central dispositions (fundamental
qualities)Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Big FiveExtroversion (Surgency)
◦ Sociability, warmth, assertivenessAgreeableness
◦ Straightforwardness, trust, altruism, modestyConscientiousness (Lack of Impulsivity)
◦ Competence, persistence, prudenceNeuroticism (Emotional Instability)
◦ Anxiety, hostility, depression, vulnerabilityOpenness (Openness to Experience, Culture,
Intellect)◦ Imagination, aesthetic sense, curiosity
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing the Big Five
Extroversion items:◦1. I talk a lot.◦2. I am quiet around strangers (reverse
coded item).◦3. I am the life of the party.
Not true of me Very true of me
1 2 3 4 5
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing the Big Five
Agreeableness items:◦4. I make others feel at ease.◦5. I tend to forgive others.◦6. I am not much interested in other
people's problems (reverse coded).
Not true of me Very true of me
1 2 3 4 5
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing the Big Five
Conscientiousness items:◦7. I am always well-prepared.◦8. I persevere with my tasks.◦9. I may shirk my duties (reverse
coded).
Not true of me Very true of me
1 2 3 4 5
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing the Big Five
Neuroticism items:◦10. I get irritated easily.◦11. I am calm most of the time (reverse
coded)◦12. I worry a lot.
Not true of me Very true of me
1 2 3 4 5
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing the Big Five
Openness items:◦13. I have many ideas.◦14. I prefer concrete to abstract ideas
(reverse coded).◦15. I don't spend much time reflecting
about things (reverse coded).
Not true of me Very true of me
1 2 3 4 5
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Big FiveCreated through factor analysis
Emerged from data, not theory
Behavior genetics and cross-cultural research suggest these traits are “real”
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Big Five
The Big Five predicts useful and important life outcomes
This does not mean there are only five traits◦These traits are extremely broad
and contain narrower traits within them
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Big ThreeTraits are derived from three
underlying biological systems◦Extroversion—outgoingness and
assertiveness◦Neuroticism—instability and
apprehensiveness◦Psychoticism—tendency toward
psychopathology
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Consensus in Personality Judgments
The importance of consensus in determining the reality of personality traits
Friends’ judgments vs. strangers’ judgments (zero acquaintance)
Highest agreement for extroversion and conscientiousnessCopyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
MotivesInternal psychobiological forces
that help induce particular behavior patterns
NeedsLife-TasksPersonal Strivings
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Motivation: Henry Murray
Murray’s Needs
Need for Achievement: n Ach◦The need to succeed on tasks that
are set out by society
Need for Affiliation: N Aff◦The need to draw near and win the
affection of othersCopyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Motivation: Henry MurrayNeed for Power: n Power
◦The need to seek positions and offices in which one can exert control over others
Need for Exhibition n Exh◦The need to show one’s self before
others and to entertain, amuse, shock, and excite others
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Motivation changes how we see the world
Differing motivations can change our perceptions, even when judging completely objective characteristics such as distance.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Expressive Style
Vocal characteristics, facial expressions, body movements, etc.
Emotional Expressiveness◦People differ in their overall
expressiveness◦Expressive people tend to be seen as
charismatic and attractive◦Extroversion and dominance are related
to expressivenessCopyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
SkillsIntelligence
◦Measures vocabulary use, mathematical skills, spatial reasoning, etc.
Social-Emotional Intelligence◦Specific social and emotional
abilities in dealing with other people
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Timeline:Trait and Skill Approach
Developments in Trait Aspects
Societal and Scientific Context
In ancient Greece, the ideas of character and temperament develop, as caused by the so-called bodily humors
Ancient times
Nature is thought to be composed of air, earth, fire, and water
Religious interpretations view persons as divine creations possessed by good or evil
Middle Ages
Humans are seen as agents in a struggle between good and evil
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Timeline:Trait and Skill Approach
Developments in Trait Aspects
Societal and Scientific Context
Search for basic traits of individual differences begins, unsuccessfully
1800s Following the Enlightenment, philosophers search for the core of human nature
Carl Jung and colleagues search for deep-rooted individual differences in orientation toward the world
1920s-1940s
Experimental Psychology is dominated by behaviorism and clinical psychology is dominated by psychoanalysis
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Timeline:Trait and Skill Approach
Developments in Trait Aspects
Societal and Scientific Context
Gordon Allport proposes trait theory of personality
1930s Rise of fascism stimulates interest in propaganda and authoritarianism
Statistics (especially factor analysis) are developed and applied by Cattell and others …
1930s-1950s
Testing becomes the norm for college admission and psychological screening…
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Timeline:Trait and Skill Approach
Developments in Trait Aspects
Societal and Scientific Context
…Henry Murray develops a motive-based approach to individual differences, termed personology
1930s-1950s
…Clinical psychology becomes more science-based, and experimental psychology considers clinical applications
"Crisis" in personality as traits fail to fully predict behavior across situations
1960s-1970s
Time of social change, as Americans open new roles in civil rights and women's rights
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Timeline:Trait and Skill Approach
Developments in Trait Aspects
Societal and Scientific Context
The Big Five approach to traits takes hold
1990s Increased use of longitudinal approaches reveals long-term stability of certain individual differences
Traits, motives, goals, and expressive styles are studied in more sophisticated ways
2000s Personality psychology is re-established as a major subfield
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Trait and Skill ApproachAnalogy
◦Humans are clusters of temperaments, traits, and skills
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Trait and Skill ApproachAdvantages
◦Simplifies personality to a small number of basic dimensions
◦Looks for a deeper consistency underlying behaviors
◦Good assessment techniques◦Allows for comparisons between
individuals
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Trait and Skill Approach
Limits◦May reach too far trying to capture
the individual in a few ways--oversimplification
◦May label people on the basis of test scores
◦Sometimes underestimates variability across situations
◦May underestimate the influence of unconscious motives and early experience
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Trait and Skill ApproachView of free will
◦Allows for free will at the margins, after predispositions and motives exert their influence
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Trait and Skill ApproachCommon assessment techniques
◦Factor analysis, self-report, testing of styles and skills, document analysis, behavioral observation, interviews
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Trait and Skill ApproachImplications for therapy
◦If much of personality is structured around a small number of key dispositions then we can change our goals and orientations but probably not our basic dispositional “natures”
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.