Basic principles of Latvian competition law. Plan 1.Principles, aims and history of competition law...
-
Upload
jasper-walby -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Basic principles of Latvian competition law. Plan 1.Principles, aims and history of competition law...
Basic principles of Latvian competition law
2
Plan
1. Principles, aims and history of competition law2. Competition Council and its powers3. Prohibited Agreements4. When the agreement is prohibited5. Liability6. Amendments to the Competition Law
3
Part one: General
• Principles, aims and history of competition law
• Some basic concepts
4
…
Adam Smith (1723 – 1790), philosopher and political economist
• Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776).
“People of the same trade seldom meet together, .. But the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices."
5
Competition law in Latvia?
• 90s – The goal is to join the EC• 1999 – First try• 2002 – The new law
• Why Europe needs competition law?
6
Objectives
• Promotion of competition in the market - • Ensuring independent activity of each market participant• Restricting the creation or abuse of the market power
• Aims:• lower prices• better quality• Broader choice• More innovations
7
Pillars of competition law
1. Prohibition of anti competitive agreements2. Prohibition of abuse of the dominant position3. Merger control 4. Control of state aid
8
Applicable laws and other sources
• EU law• Latvian laws:
• Competition Law (in force since January 2002)• Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers
9
Market participants
• Any natural or legal person• Legal persons: whole group• Also self-employed, individual merchants
• Associations of market participants
• Criteria:• Is engaged or is preparing to engage in the economic
activities in Latvia• Economic activities: any sales of goods/provision of any
services (except for public services)
10
Relevant market
• Purpose of relevant market definition • to identify the competitors, consumers, customers of the
respective market participants• to determine the boundaries within which the market
participants are competing or are situated in circumstances where they can compete
• Definition of the relevant market. Two Pillars:• Product market• Geographic market
11
Product market
• Substitution• Demand• Supply• Barriers
• Key: “specific features of the product and its utilisation characteristics”
12
Geographic market
• Substitution• Barriers• Imports
• Key: “appreciably different conditions”
13
Part two: Competition authorities
• Structure• Rights (obligations)?
14
What’s in its name?
• Competition Council = Konkurences padome• www.kp.gov.lv• Chairperson of the Council Ms. Ieva Jaunzeme • Executive body - the Bureau
15
What do they do?
• Investigations and market studies• Breach cases• Mergers• New laws: review/opinions
16
Powers – general overview
• Information request • For a very wide range of objectives• The necessary information including the commercial
secret• Rights are very wide• Limitations to the rights - there are no direct norms of the
law• Procedural preconditions - powers of attorneys, court
decisions• Forced enforcement, money fines
17
Dawn raids
• Broad powers of investigation
• The inspection may take place with or without prior warning
• The inspections without warning are called "dawn raids"
• Only the powers stipulated by the law• European Commission - Regulation No 1/2003• Competition Council - Competition Law (new since 2002)
• Little practice at application of the law
18
Documents to be presented
• Power of attorney• ID • Court decision• Decision of the head of the bureau
19
Powers of the CC during dawn raids
• Access to the company and employees' premises/property (including transport vehicles)
• Rights to open storage facilities • Examination of the company and its employees' property• Rights to demand explanations• Receive copies, remove originals/property• Seal the premises, transport vehicles, storehouses
20
When they come – what to do?
• To think of:• Your lawyer (whatever time of the day)• What you have done/written• Fines
• Cooperate• Be polite but strict. Keep the investigation under control• Set up a team for representation of the company at the investigation• Inform all the employees• Keep precise copies of the information acquired by the investigators• Accompany the investigators continuously• Put down the questions and answers
21
Rights of the company during the raid
• Rights in relation to the protected information: • "confidentiality" mark• Limits of the investigated case
• "Legal privilege" or the confidentiality of the lawyer's correspondence
22
Part three: Agreements
• The rule • „Agreement”• Prohibited agreements –
black list• Horizontal and vertical
agreements
23
The rule
• Agreements with an object or effect of hindrance, restriction or distortion of competition in the territory of Latvia are prohibited and void from the moment of conclusion between market participants
• Principle of invalidity of the agreement• Object or effect?• Agreement
24
Hindrance, Restriction or Distortion of Competition
•Test:•Object or effect?
• It is enough that competition can be potentially hindered, restricted or distorted
•"Affected market"• Horizontal/Vertical• Relevant product market• Relevant geographical market
25
Agreement I
• “Traditional” agreement• It does not have to be a written document • Does not have to be binding (also gentlemen's agreement)• Does not have to be fulfilled• But has to be concluded between "independent entities" (that is, does not
relate to mutual agreements between parent and subsidiary companies)
26
Agreement II
• Decisions of associations of undertakings: • Recommendations, common standards, models of action• The form and legal consequences bear no significance, the
participant’s attitude towards such decisions is important
• Concerted practices: • Without arrangement - the market participants does not inform each
other about their activities• Type of company coordination, which - wihthout knowingly set out in
a form of an agreement, threatens the competition, includes practical cooperation of companies
27
Prohibited agreements - "black list"
• Agreements, which:• Directly or indirectly fix prices for purchase or sale, or any other
trading conditions;• Restrict or control production, markets, technical development, or
investments;• Divides markets or sources of supply;• Applies unequal provisions in equivalent transactions with third
persons, creating for them disadvantageous conditions in terms of competition;
• Make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which by their nature or according to commercial usage have no connection with the subject of such contracts.
28
Exchange of information
• European Commission in case of IFTRA Rules on Glass Containers:
• It is contrary to provisions of Article 81 that the producer contacts his competitors in relation to significant elements of his price policy, for example, pricelists, discounts and sale conditions applied by him, rates and dates, when they are changed, and special exceptions, which he can award to specific clients
29
Is "information" illegal?
• Life in information vacuum?
• Operation in full independence from competitors?
• Special case - oligopoly [for example, fuel market]
30
Agreements on Prices
• Nintendo case
• Vitamin Cartel
31
Market and/or client division
• Purpose of market and/or customer division is to provide the members of a cartel with a possibility to maintain an artificially dominant or even monopoly position in a definite geographical territory.
32
Other examples
• "The distributor undertakes to purchase Goods only form the Producer"
• "Within the premises of the Distributor, only the Producer's goods are allowed for sale"
• "Opening of every new sales place by the Distributor shall be coordinated with the Producer"
• "The Parties have agreed that the Distributor shall be the exclusive distributor of the Producer in the Territory"
• "During the term of this Agreement the Seller will not involve in active sale of Goods within the Territory"
• Appendix XXX to the agreement between YYY and ZZZ “retail price”
33
Horizontal and vertical agreements
• Horizontal agreements:• An aggrement is concluded or concerted practices are
practiced between companies, which are active in the same level of the market [competitors]
• Vertical agreement:• Agreements which are concluded between companies
which are active in various levels of production or supply chain
34
Vertical agreements
• The competition may be limited: • among various brands (inter-brand competition) or • competition between the distributors of goods of one and the same
brand (inter-brand competition). • Most harmful agreements to the competition are those agreements
which influence the inter-brand competition, rather than between the distributors.
• However, limitations to the intra-brand competition can be harmful in case the inter-brand competition is limited at the same time.
35
Horizontal agreements
• Members of a cartel engage in cartels in order to be able to rely on their existing market share, on the existing clients and they do not need to offer new or better products for competitive prices. Accordingly, the consumer loses because he pays more for goods of worse quality.
• Price fixing if it is only a purpose or recommendation influences the competition because as a result of such decision, all participants can foresee with a reasonable degree of certainty what price policy will be adopted by their competitors, especially if the fixing of a target price is accompanied by a possibility of control and sanction.
36
Part four: when the agreement is prohibited
• Exemptions from the prohibition
• De minimis
37
Exemptions
• Agreement may be allowed or allowed on conditions for a definite term if
• the agreement promotes improvement of goods production or sale, or the economic progress and therefore
• ensures benefit for the consumer, besides • these agreements do not impose limitations to the respective
market participants, which are not necessary for reaching these aims and
• avoids the possibility to eliminate competition in a significant relevant market share.
38
De minimis
• Agreements which cannot significantly harm the competition:
• Agreements between companies which operate in one level of manufacture or distribution (horizontal agreement) if the joint market share of the both/all parties in the relevant market does not exceed 10%
• Agreements between companies which operate in different levels of manufacture or distribution (vertical agreement) if the market share of the contracting party in the relevant market does not exceed 15%
39
Part five: Liability
• Penalties
• Leniency
40
Penalties
•Competitors – 10%•Non-competitors – 5%
•Civil liability
41
Leniency
• What is leniency policy?• Allows the company to cooperate with the authority during the
or even to initiate it• “Whistle-blowers" L
• Aim – destabilization of cartels
• Consequences:• Reduction of/exemption from penalty• Does not influence the civil liability
42
Part six: Amendments
• History• Process• Result• Consequences
43
Just to reiterate….
• History
• Process
44
Part 2 of Clause 13
• A market participant or several market participants are in a dominant position in retail, if:
• they, taking into account their buyer power and dependence of the suppliers in the relevant market,
• have the capacity to directly or indirectly apply or impose unfair and unjustified provisions, conditions, or payments upon the suppliers, and
• have the capacity to hinder, restrict or distort competition in any relevant market within the territory of Latvia for a substantial length of time.
45
Prohibition
• Any market participant holding a dominant position in retail is prohibited from abusing such position in the territory of Latvia.
46
Abuse I
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified provisions regarding the return of the goods, unless the returned goods are:
• Goods of bad quality, • New goods, which were not previously known to the consumers
provided that the increased supplies thereof were initiated by the supplier
47
Abuse II
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments for the presence of the delivered goods at a retail sales point, unless such payments are justifiable as marketing costs for new products, which were not previously known to the consumers;
48
Abuse III
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments in exchange for entering into a contract, unless such payments are justifiable as costs for entering into a contract with a new supplier, which therefore requires special evaluation;
49
Abuse IV
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments in exchange for delivery of goods to a new, yet-to-be-opened retail point of sale;
50
Abuse V
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustifiably long payment periods for delivered goods.
51
Abuse VI
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustifiable sanctions for the breach of the agreement.
52
Consequences / conclusions
• It depends….
Thank you!Jūlija JerņevaMob: +371 29131597https://www.linkedin.com/in/julijajerneva