AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

download AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

of 19

Transcript of AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    1/19

    Global targets and their implications forGlobal targets and their implications for

    risk andrisk and adaptationadaptation: new findings on the

    feasibility of a 1.5r

    C goal

    Nicola Ranger

    Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment

    Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy

    Research in

    collaborationwith:

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    2/19

    Context

    Ad-Hoc Working Group on Long-term CooperativeAction under the Convention: Text to facilitatenegotiations among Parties (9th July):

    Agrees that Deep cuts in global emissions arerequired according to the science, and as

    documented in the FourthAssessment Report of theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, with aview to reducing global emissions so as to maintainthe increase in global temperature below [1][1.5][2]degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    3/19

    Contents

    Current status: emissions and pledges

    Findings on the feasibility of 2rC and 1.5rC goal

    Implications for risk

    If time a new result on normalisation of losses

    due to extreme events

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    4/19

    Current Status: Emissions and Pledges

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

    lo

    al

    H

    Emissions

    (Billionsoftonnes

    of

    arondioid

    eequivalent)

    Estimates fr m

    ccor Pledges

    Business as Usual

    Sources: Pledge calculations from Rogelj et al. 2010 and Taylor & Stern 2009, and

    historical emissions from the World Resources Institute CAIT database/IEA2009

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    5/19

    Feasibility of a 2rC goal

    Previous work has shown that it is

    scientifically, economically andtechnologically feasibility to limit globalmean warming to 2rC with at least a 50%probability

    48GtCO2e

    44GtCO2e

    40GtCO2e

    GlobalGreenhou

    seGasEmissions

    (billionsoftonnesofcarbondioxideequivalentemissions,GtCO

    2e)

    This will require strong and earlyglobal emissions reductions

    Global emissions will need topeak within the next 5 10years and fall at a rate ofaround 3 4% per yearafterwards.

    Global emissions between

    40 48 GtCO2e in 2020(current = 48GtCO2e)

    Evidence suggests that sucha target is challenging, butboth technically feasible andeconomically desirable

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    6/19

    Current Status: Emissions and Pledges

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

    lo

    al

    H

    Emissions

    (Billionsoftonnes

    of

    arondioideequivalent)

    Estimates from

    ccord Pledges

    Business as Usual

    22rrC windowC window

    (50:50 chance)(50:50 chance)

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    7/19

    Is a 1.5C goal feasible?

    Gi en where we are now,it looks ery unlikely thatglobal meantemperatures can bemaintained below 1.5rCabo e pre-industrialle els (i.e. not

    o ershooting).

    To give a 50:50 chance ofremaining below 1.5rCwould require emissions topeak by 2012 and then

    decline at very high rates(at least 6% per year).

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100

    GlobalEm

    issionsofGreenhouseGases

    (billionso

    ftonnesofCO2equivalent)

    48Gt

    40Gt

    Even if emissions

    were reduced to

    zero in 2020, thechance of exceeding

    1.5 degrees would

    be roughly 55%

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    8/19

    Current Status: Emissions and Pledges

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

    lo

    al

    H

    Emissions

    (Billionsoftonnes

    of

    arondioideequivalent)

    Estimates from

    ccord Pledges

    Business as Usual

    22rrC windowC window

    (50:50 chance)(50:50 chance)

    1.51.5rrC windowC window(50:50 chance)(50:50 chance)

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    9/19

    Feasibility of a 1.5rC Goal

    This research does not rule out the achievement of a 1.5rC goal

    in the long run.

    However, it may be feasible reduce emissions strongly enough

    to limit the duration of overshoot to a few decades, giving at

    least a 50% chance of keeping global temperatures below 2rC

    and returning below 1.5rC before 2100.

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100

    GlobalMeanTemper

    ature(medianestimate,

    C)

    2rC

    1.5rC

    0.00

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    30.00

    35.00

    40.00

    45.00

    50.00

    2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

    Gl

    lE

    ss

    ns

    fGeenh

    useG

    ses

    ll

    ns

    ftnnes

    fC

    2e

    u

    lent

    2C, 40Gt n 2020 R2 010

    1.5C, 40Gt n 2020 40 _4%

    2C, 48Gt n 2020 R2 010

    1.5C, 48Gt n 2020 48 _5%

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    10/19

    Feasibility of a 1.5rC Goal: with overshooting

    The feasibility of bring global temperatures down to 1.5rC by 2100 is

    open to debate.Achieving this will require:

    1. Early and strong reductions in global emissions: global emissions

    must begin to fall within 5 years and reach less than 44 GtCO2e by 2020

    2. Rapid reductions in annual global emissions after 2020: global

    emissions would need to fall at 4 5% pa (depending on 2020 emissions)

    3. Very low global emissions in 2100 and zero emissions in the long

    term: global emissions would need to fall below 2 GtCO2e by 2100.

    4. Assumption that it is possible for the global a erage temperature to

    exceed a goal (i.e. o ershoot) and then return within a few decades:

    there are large uncertainties in the science

    We do not rule out the achie ement of a 1.5rC goal in the long

    term, however, we conclude that the costs are likely to be

    considerably higher than for a 2rC temperature goal

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    11/19

    E idence for Rising Risks

    Source: Smith et al. 2008

    3rC

    2rC

    1.5rC

    1990 levels

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    12/19

    E idence for Rising Risks

    Risks from extreme weather e ents: risks rise non-linearly with warming

    Marine ecosystems

    Up to 1.5rC: increased coral bleaching; negative impacts on marine

    ecosystems

    Around 2rC:All coral reefs bleached

    All ecosystems: Around 1.5rC:Approx. 9 - 31% of species committed to extinction

    Around 2.2rC:Approx. 15 37% of species committed to extinction

    Around 2.9rC:Approx. 21 52% of species committed to extinction

    Other impacts:

    Additional implications

    for food and water

    supplies; & risks of

    extreme events

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    13/19

    E idence for Rising Risks

    Coastal inundation of low-lyingareas due to sea le el rise:

    Sea level rise (thermalexpansion): ~ 10 20cmdifference between 1.5 and2rC (potentially a doubling)

    Small increases in mean sealevel can significantly increasevulnerability to storm surge

    Rising global temperatureincreases the risk of

    accelerated sea level rise.Around 2 - 3rC: Threshold forirreversible melting ofGreenland Ice Sheet (7m)

    resent

    Da

    s

    Sea evelise

    s

    Sea evelise +

    Increase

    Cat

    s

    Sea evelise +

    Decrease

    Cat

    ercentageChangein

    resentDa

    AverageAnna

    loss

    Example: Storm Surge Risk

    in Grand Cayman

    Source: Lloyds of London & RMS2008

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    14/19

    Current Status: Temperature

    Source: Rogelj et al. 2010

    Two scenarios:

    Red = meet current

    pledges only

    Blue = meet current

    pledges then go on toachieve a 50% reduction

    in emissions by 2050

    Conclusion: an ambitious

    long-term emissions

    reduction goal (beyond2020) is ital to maintain

    temperatures at 2rC orbelow

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    15/19

    Uncertainties in Future Risks

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.00

    1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090

    Glo

    balMeanTemp

    erature(C)

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    16/19

    Conclusions

    It is likely that the world will see global mean temperatures riseto at least 1.5rC abo e pre-industrial le els o er the comingfew decades (by around 2050 on median projections)

    With strong action, we may be able to bring temperatures backbelow 1.5rC within 50 100 years, but this overshoot period willbring increased risks.

    It may not be possible to know whether or not it is feasible for adecade or more to come. Early and strong action to reduceemissions prior to 2020, will leave open the option to strengthenthe temperature goal to 1.5rC

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    17/19

    Detection of Trends in Extremes

    Economic loss from hurricane in the Caribbean and CentralAmerica normalised to remove exposure growth

    Bender et al. (2010) rates of cat45 hurricanesincreasing (on average) but no statisticallydetectable trends for another 60 years

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    18/19

    EXTRA SLIDES

  • 8/8/2019 AOSIS_1.5C_Oxford_112010

    19/19