Against Stretching
-
Author
anonymous-ftiktbnp -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Against Stretching
-
8/17/2019 Against Stretching
1/4
T h e A r g u m e n t A g a i n s t S t a t i c S t r e t c h i n g
B e f o r e S p o r t a n d P h y s i c a l A c t i v i t y
MARK S. KOVACS, MEd, CSCS, USATF II • University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
KEY POINTS
JTreexercise static stretching has been used
by coaches and athletes for decades in the
hope of improving performance and prevent-
ing injuries. The scientific literature of the
1980s and 1990s suggested that preexercise
static stretching was a good addition to ath-
letes' warm-up before initiation of physical
activity.''^ This article reviews the current
literature and provides information to pro-
pose a valid argument
against the widely held
belief that slow static
stretching before sport
and physical activity is
beneficial.
S t a t i c s t r e t c h i n g h a s b e e n u s e d
a s
a
w a r m - u p a c t i v i t y f o r d e c a d e s , w i t h o u t a n y
c r e d i b l e r e s e a r c h t o s u p p o r t i t s b e n e f i t s f o r
p e r f o r m a n c e o r i n j u r y p r e v e n t i o n .
S t a t i c s t r e t c h i n g b e f o r e a c t i v i t y r e d u c e s
p e r fo r m a n c e i n s t r e n g t h , s p e e d , a n d p o w e r
a c t i v i t i e s .
S t a t i c s t r e t c h i n g b e f o r e a c t i v i t y d o e s n o t
a p p e a r t o r e d u c e i n j u r y .
K e y w o r d s : f l e x i b i l i t y , p e r f o r m a n c e , r a n g e
o f m o t io n , w a r m - u p
Performance
Despite early evidence
that s tatic stretching
before activity did not
improve performance,'
it remains a common
element of warm-up
routines for physical
activity. Contrary to the
widely held belief that static stretching
improves physical performance, numerous
studies have demonstrated that traditional
static stretching actually decreases perfor-
mance in activities that require strength,
speed, and power.^'' ' Depth-jump perfor-
mance, a good indicator of power output,
has been shown to be significantly reduced
after static stretch ing, •'' as has vertical-jump
heig ht.'^' Studies of strength and power
have demonstrated performance decreases
of as much as
30%.'' '^' ' ' '
Knee-flexion
-extension maximal performance (1-R
me asured 10 min after static stretching w
reduced by 7 .3% and 8.1 %, respectiv
Avela et al.'^ and Fov^/les et al.' found re
tions in maximal isometric plantar-flex
torque abou t the ankle joint after the pla
flexors were passively stretched (23.2
2 8 , respectively).
The deficit in performance after s
stretching might depend on the type
stretching and mode of activity that
lows the stretching routine. The deficit
been shown to last approximately 60
after completion of the stretching rou
and might be a result of changes in re
sensitivity, muscle/tendon stiffness, or
romuscular activation.'•'̂ •'̂ •'* The positiv
negative effect on performance after s
stretching might depend on the speed
movement required by the activity In
study, a preactivity static-stretching rou
had no effect on either the speed or
accuracy of an explosive tennis serve,'
preactivity stretching might not decr
performance of high-speed or accur
related movements. Another study d
onstrated that significant reductions
isokinetic strength were only evident at
velocities (< 2.62 radian/s).^
A
recent s
found, however, that static stretching sig
cantly reduced sprinting performance
a 20-m distance.' The results of num e
studies have demonstrated that preac
ity static stretching reduces performa
in activities requiring strength, speed,
D 2 0 0 6 H u m a n K in e ti cs
A T T 1 1 3 ) ,
6 1 MAY 2 6
ATHLETIC THERAPY TO
-
8/17/2019 Against Stretching
2/4
Injury Prevention
addition to the widespread misconception that pre-
a second
as an
important preactivity ritual
is
it reduces the likelihood of subsequent
on the idea that a tight
scle-te ndo n unit is less extensible without stretch-
its tolerance for elongation
has resulted in a
of injury,'̂ '̂ ^
A study of lower limb injuries amo ng 1,538 m ale
ct on injury ra tes after a 12-week stretching
ocol,^ A 2001 system atic review of experimen-
and quasi-experimental studies pertaining to the
of
lower limb running injuries analyzed
of five studies, with 1,944 par
in stretching-intervention groups and 3,159
in
control groups,
and
reported that
no
is available to support tbe notion tha t
ty stretching exercises are effective In prevent-
Some experimental studies have shown a reduction
njury rates when preactivity stretching was included
A study of high school football
a
reduction in
uries amo ng players who participated in
a
halftime
ho
did
not participate
in
such
a
routine,̂ A limita-
in the
applicability
of tbe
finding
of
this study
a lack of distinction between the effect of general
tbe effect of tbe static-
A
retrospective case-control study
of
sprinters who
bad
never experienced ham-
coaches and athletic trainers who assume that
of
hamstring flexibility
the injuries, Tbe injury might have been the
use of the hamstring weakness and lack of hamstring
A lthough tbe results of a few studies have suggested
k between preactivity stretching and reduced injury
tbe majority of the relevant research evidence
fails
to
support
tbe
concept,* Tbe etiologies
of
most
sports injuries involve multiple complex factors. Flex-
ibility is one
of
numerous factors that can affect injury
susceptibility. Both fatigue^* and volume of activity
have been suggested as predisposing factors for muscle
injury. ore research is needed to identify tbe underlying
causes of exercise-induced muscle and tendon injuries,
from which we can develop guidelines for training and
competition to reduce the likelihood of injury.
Prac tica l pp lications a nd Sugg estions
The existing research literature collectively indicates
tbat static stretching witbin an bour before practice
or competition d oes not improve siports performance,
nor does
it
appear
to
reduce
tbe
risk
of
injury. Poor
muscle strength and limited joint range of motion,
however, might reduce performance and increase the
risk
of
injury,^® Clearly, athletic trainers should
pre
scribe static-stretching routines for som e a thletes, but
stretching before sport practice sessions and competi-
tive events is not advisable,
A
better time for athletes
to perform static stretcbing is after sports activity^'' or
in tbe evenings. Performing stretcbing activities at the
en d
of
workouts
or
after practice sessions provides
improvements
in
range
of
motion similar
to
those
from performing them a t otber times,''° Other warm-up
activities, including general musck;-warming exercises
and dynamic (i,e,, active) range-of-motion exercises,
might be m ost beneficial in improving pbysical perfor-
mance,' ' ^ Although adequate research evidence is
not yet available
to
definitively recommend dynamic
Specific
Dynamic
Warm up
10 minutes building
from light to
explosive
movements
TR INING COMPETITION
CTIVITY
Generai
Cooi down
5-10 minutes slow
Evening
Static
Stretching
Session
Generai
Warm up
* 3-5 minutes slow
S ta t i c
10-20 minutes on s t r e t c h i n g
speafic musdiis
used during actii/lty
15-60
minutes on ail
muscle
groups
depending
on sport and
level of
athlete)
Figure Daily stretching routine.
'18, 19, 22, 24, 25, 27-29, 34, 35,
TIC THERAPY TODAY
MAY 2006
-
8/17/2019 Against Stretching
3/4
range-of-motion warm-up exercises, significantly faster
20-m sprint performance after dynamic range of
motion warm-up has been reported,^ Athletes might
benefit from dynamic warm-up exercises before
activity, with traditional static-stretching exercises
performed at the conclusion of physical activity, I
eferen es
1. Shellock FG, Prentice WE. Warming up and stretching for improved
physical performance and prevention of sports related injuries.
Sports
Med.
1985:2:267-268,
2.
Smith CA, The warm -up p roce dure : to stretch or not to stretch, a brief
review,
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
1994; 19:12-17,
3 . DeVries HA, The loos enes s factor in spee d and 0^ con sum ption of
an anaerobic 100-yard dash.
Re s
Q. 1963:34(3) :305-313,
4. Kokkonen J, Nelson AG, Cornwell A. Acute muscle stretching inhibits
max imal st rength performa nce, Res Q
Exerc Sport.
1998;69:411-
415,
5.
Nelson AG, Guillory IK, Cornwell A, KokkonenJ. Inhibition of maximal
voluntary isokinetic torque production following stretching is velocity
specific,ySfren^f/i
CondRes.
2001: I5(2) :24l -246.
6. Nelson AG, Kokkonen J. Acute ballistic muscle stretching inhibits
maximal st rength performance.
Res Q Exerc Sport.
2001 ;72(4) :4I5-
419.
7. Avela J, Kyrola inen H, Komi PV. Altered reflex sen sitivity after
repeated and p rolonged passive muscle st retching. /
Appl Physiol
1999:86(4) :1283-1291 .
8. Fletcher IM, Jon es B, The effect of different wa rm-up stretch protocols
on 20-m sprint performance in trained rugby union piayers . J S trength
CondRes.
2004:18{4) :885-888.
9. Fowles JR, Sale DG. MacDougall JD, Reduc ed strength after p assive
st retch of the hum an plantar
flexors. J Appl Physiol
2000 :89(3 ): 1179-
1188,
10. Nelson AG, Driscoll NM, Young MA, Schexnayder IC. Acute effects
of passive muscle st retching on spr int performance,
J Sport Sci.
2005:23(5) :449-454.
11.
Young W, Elliott S. Acute effects of static stretching, proprioceptive
neuromuscular faci l i tat ion st retching, and maximum voluntary con-
t ract ions on explosive force product ion and Jumping performance.
Res Q Exerc Sport.
2001:72(3) :273-279,
12 . Young WB, Behm DG. Effects of running, static stretching and prac-
t ice Jump s on explosive force product ion and Jumping performance .
J Sports M ed Phys Fitness.
2003 :43 :21-27 ,
13 . C ornwell A, Nelson AG, Sidaway B, Acute effects of stretch ing on the
neurom echanical proper t ies of the t r iceps surae muscle complex.
Eur
J Appl Physiol
2002:86:428-434 .
14 . Cornwell A, Nelson AG, Heise GD, Sidaway B. The acute effects of
passive muscle st retching on ver t ical Jump performance.y Hum
M ov
Stud
2001:40:307-324.
15 . W ilson GJ, Murphy AJ, Pryor JF Mu sculoten dinous stiffness: its rela-
t ionship to eccentr ic, i sometr ic, and concentr ic performance. J/ lpp/
Physiol 1994:76(6) :2714-27I9.
16 . Evetovich TK, Naum an NJ, Conley DS, Todd JB. Effect of static stretch-
ing of the bicep brachi i on torque, elect romyography, and mec hano -
myography during concentric isokinetic muscle a ction. J Strength ond
Res.
2003 :17(3) :484-488.
17 . Knudson DV, Noffal GJ, Bahamonde RE, BauerJA, BlackwellJR, Stretch-
ing has no effect on tennis serve performance./Sfrenj t / i
Cond Res.
2004:18(3) :654-656.
18. G arrett WE. Muscle flexibility a nd function und er stretch . In: Gordon
SL, Gonzalez-Mestre X, Garret t WE, eds.
Sports and Exercise in
Midlife. Rosemont , 111: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons:
1993:105-116.
19 . Hun ter DG, Spriggs J, Investigation into the relations hip b
the passive flexibility and active stiffness of the ankle plantar
muscles. lin
Biomech.
2000:15(8) :600-606.
20.
Po pe RP, Herbe rt RD, Kirwan JD, Graham BJ, A rand om ized
pre exercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb injury.
M
Sports Exerc.
2000:32(2) :271-277.
21 . Com eau MJ, Stretch or no stretch? Cons. Strength
CondJ
2002
20-21,
22. Herbert RD, Gabriel M. Effects of stretching before and after e
ing on muscle soreness and risk of injury: systematic review.
J.
2002:325(7362) :468-470,
23 . Pope RP, Herbert RD, Kirwan JD, Effects of flexibility and str
on injury risk in army recruits. AustJ Physiother. 1998:44:165
24 . Shrier I . Stretching before exercise does not reduce the risk o
muscle injury a critical review of the clinical and basic science
ture.
ClinJ Sports Med.
1999:9:221-227,
25 . Shrier
I.
Does stretching improve performance? a systematic an
cal review of the literature, ClinJ Sports Med. 2004:14(5) :267-
2 6 . Levine U, Lombardo J, McNeeley J, Anderson T, An analy
individual stretching programs of intercollegiate athletes. Ph
Sportsmed.
1987:15:130-136 .
27 .
S h r i e r I . F l e x i b i l i ty v e r s u s s t r e t c h i n g .
Br J Sports
2001:35(5) : 364 .
28 .
Shrier 1, Gossal K, Myths and truths of stretching.
Physician Spo
2000:28(8) :57-63,
29 . Yeung EW, Yeung SS. system atic review of interventions to preve
limb soft tissue running injuries.
BrJ Sports
Med 2001:35(6) :383
30. Bixler B, Jones RL, High school football Injuries: effects of a post-h
warm-up and stretching routine.
FamPractResJ.
1992:12(2):13
3 1 .
Jonhagen S, Nemeth G, Eriksson E. Hamstring injuries in spr
the role of concentr ic and eccentr ic hamstr ing muscle st reng
flexibility Am J Sports M ed. 1994:22:262-266.
3 2 . Cross KM, Worrell TW. Effects of static stretching program
incidence of lower extremity musculotendinous st rains.y/ I f / i /
1999:34(1):11-14.
3 3 .
Ekstrand J, Gillquist J, The avoidability of soccer injuries,
lntj
Med.
1983:4(2) : 124-128.
3 4.
Andersen jC. Stretching before and after exercise: effect on
soreness and injury
r\s\^. J Athl Tra in.
2005:40(3) :218-220,
3 5 . Levine U, Lombardo J, McNeeley J, Anderson T. An analy
individual stretching programs of intercollegiate athletes.
Ph
Sportsmed.
1987:15:130-136 ,
3 6 .
van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Kemper HCC, Voorn WJ, dejongh R
vention of running injuries by warm-up, cool-down, and stre
exercises. /4mySporfs Med. 1993:21(5) :71I-719,
3 7 .
Ma cera CA, Pate RP, Powell KE, Jac kso n KL, Kend rick J S, Crav
Predict ing lower-extremity injur ies among habi tual runners
Intern Med.
1989:149(11 ) :2565-2568 ,
3 8. Thacker SB, Gilchrist J, Stroup DF The impact of stretching on
injury risk: a systematic review of the literature,
M ed Sci Sports
cise.
2004:36:371-378.
3 9 . Knudson D, Stretching during warm-up: do we have enough evi
JPhys Educ Recreation Dance.
1999:70(7) :24-27,
4 0 .
C ornelius WL, Hag em ann RW, Jack son AW. A study o n plac em
stretching within a
workout. J Sports Med Phys Fitness.
1988:2
2 3 6 .
41 .
Bergh U, Ekblom B, Physical performanc e and p eak aerobic
at di fferent body tempe ratures,y/ lpp/P/ iy,sio/ . 1979:46:885 -88
42. Blom strand EV, Bergh B, Essen-Gustavsson B, Ekblom B. The in
of muscle temperature on muscle metabol ism and dur ing i
dynamic exercise.
Acta Physiol
Scand 1984:120:229-236 ,
ark ovacs is a doctoral student in human performance at th
versity of Alabama and a Level II sprints coach with USA Track
Field, His research is focused on optimizing human performanc
8 1 MAY 2 6
-
8/17/2019 Against Stretching
4/4