Population Genetics. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Determination a)A b)B c)both A and B d)neither A nor...

Post on 20-Dec-2015

222 views 0 download

Transcript of Population Genetics. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Determination a)A b)B c)both A and B d)neither A nor...

Population Genetics

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Determination

a) A

b) B

c) both A and B

d) neither A nor B

Which of these populations are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?

Question 6 – Chap. 23

• Researchers examining a particular gene in a fruit fly population discovered that the gene can have either of two slightly different sequences, designated A1 and A2. Further tests showed that 70% of the gametes produced in the population contained the A1 sequence. If the population is at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, what proportion of flies carries both A1 and A2?

• A 0.7 B 0.49 C 0.21 D 0.42 E 0.09

Question from an earlier edition of Campbell

• At a locus with a dominant and recessive allele in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, 16% of the individuals are homozygous for the recessive allele. What is the frequency of the dominant allele in the population?

• A 0.84 B 0.36 C 0.6 D 0.4 E 0.48

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium is based on:

1. A very large population where all genotypes are equally viable

2. Random mating (panmixia)

3. No mutations

4. No gene flow (dispersal of individuals and their genes)

5. No natural selection

Evolutionary Change

• Evolution is a generation to generation change in a population’s frequencies of alleles – change in proportions of alleles in the gene pool is evolution at its smallest scale and is often referred to as microevolution

• The two main causes of microevolution are genetic drift and natural selection

Natural Selection

Genetic Drift

• Random changes in gene frequency in a population – this can lead to losses in genetic diversity – the population becomes more homozygous

• this is most important in small populations

Genetic Drift

Generation 1p (frequency of CR) = 0.7 q (frequency of CW) = 0.3

CRCR CRCR

CRCW

CWCW CRCR

CRCW

CRCR CRCW

CRCR CRCW

Genetic Drift

5plantsleaveoff-

spring

Generation 1p (frequency of CR) = 0.7 q (frequency of CW) = 0.3

CRCR CRCR

CRCW

CWCW CRCR

CRCW

CRCR CRCW

CRCR CRCW

CRCRCWCW

CRCW

CRCR CWCW

CRCW

CWCW CRCR

CRCW CRCW

Generation 2p = 0.5 q = 0.5

Genetic Drift

5plantsleaveoff-

spring

Generation 1p (frequency of CR) = 0.7 q (frequency of CW) = 0.3

CRCR CRCR

CRCW

CWCW CRCR

CRCW

CRCR CRCW

CRCR CRCW

CRCRCWCW

CRCW

CRCR CWCW

CRCW

CWCW CRCR

CRCW CRCW

Generation 2p = 0.5 q = 0.5

2plantsleaveoff-

spring

CRCR

CRCR CRCR

CRCRCRCR

CRCR CRCR

CRCR

CRCR CRCR

Generation 3p = 1.0 q = 0.0

Population Bottleneck

Originalpopulation

Originalpopulation

Bottleneckingevent

Originalpopulation

Bottleneckingevent

Survivingpopulation

Northern Elephant Seal

Northern Elephant Seal Population

Pre-bottleneck(Illinois, 1820)

Post-bottleneck(Illinois, 1993)

Greater prairie chicken

Range of greater prairie chicken

(a)

Location Population size

Number of alleles per locus

Percentage of eggs hatched

93<50

5.23.7

5.8

5.8

99

96

1,000–25,000 <50

750,000

75,000–200,000

Nebraska, 1998 (no bottleneck)

(b)

Kansas, 1998 (no bottleneck)

Illinois 1930–1960s 1993

Pre-bottleneck(Illinois, 1820)

Post-bottleneck(Illinois, 1993)

Greater prairie chicken

Range of greater prairie chicken

(a)

Location Population size

Number of alleles per locus

Percentage of eggs hatched

93<50

5.23.7

5.8

5.8

99

96

1,000–25,000 <50

750,000

75,000–200,000

Nebraska, 1998 (no bottleneck)

(b)

Kansas, 1998 (no bottleneck)

Illinois 1930–1960s 1993

Founder effect – founder population and three possible new populations

Mal de Meleda – founder effect

Serial Founder Effect

• Serial founder effects have occurred when populations migrate over long distances. Such long distance migrations typically involve relatively rapid movements followed by periods of settlement. The populations in each migration carry only a subset of the genetic diversity carried from previous migrations. As a result, genetic differentiation tends to increase with geographic distance.

Movement of mitochondrial genes out of Africa

‘Wisteria vine’ model of human genetic diversity

Gene Flow

• Gene flow is the movement of alleles in and out of a population

• Gene flow occurs because gametes or fertile individuals move from one population to another and take their genes with them

Gene flow

Gene Flow in Conifers

Population in which the surviving females eventually bred

Central

Eastern

Su

rviv

al r

ate

(%)

Females born in central population

Females born in eastern population

Parus major

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Central population

NORTH SEA Eastern population

Vlieland, the Netherlands

2 km

Non-Random Mating

• Hardy-Weinberg assumes random mating – if mating is not random then the population may change in the short term – the most common form of non-random mating is in-breeding – the mating of closely related individuals

• In fact inbreeding is very common – many mammals probably mate with first or second cousins in the wild; many plants self-pollinate – the ultimate form of inbreeding

• Inbreeding tends to produce homozygous populations

Inbreeding and White Squirrels

Mutations

• Mutations are the ultimate source of new genetic variations – a new mutation that is transmitted in gametes immediately changes the gene pool of a population by inserting a new allele into the gene pool