Blended learning

Post on 30-Oct-2014

5 views 0 download

Tags:

description

 

Transcript of Blended learning

Lauren KaneEducational DeveloperFlexible Learning UnitCollege of Engineering and Computer ScienceAustralian National University, Canberra

Blended Learning in

Higher Education

November 2009

BLENDED LEARNING

What it is

Research

Why it works

What it looks like

WHAT IT IS

Face-to-face

Lectures

Demonstrations

Laboratories

One Location

Discussions

OnlineChatSimulations

Many locations

Automation

Virtual world

WHAT IT IS NOT

Add-on

Use of technology

Time saving exercise

WHAT IT IS NOT

Add-on

Use of technology

Time saving exercise

BLENDED LEARNING

“Results to date show improved student learning in 19 of the 30 projects, with the remaining 11 showing no significant difference. Other outcomes achieved by the redesigns include increased course completion rates, improved retention, better student attitudes toward the subject matter, and increased student satisfaction with the mode of instruction compared to traditional formats.”

Heterick & Twigg, 2003 (as cited in Garrison & Kanuka, 2004)

BLENDED LEARNING

Face-to-face Blended Online

BLENDED LEARNING

1. Learners who took all or part of their class online performed better

2. Blended learning has a larger advantage

3. Different content and learner types

4. Educational online interactions enhance learning

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

BLENDED LEARNING

1. Learners who took all or part of their class online performed better

2. Blended learning has a larger advantage

3. Different content and learner types

4. Educational online interactions enhance learning

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

BLENDED LEARNING

1. Learners who took all or part of their class online performed better

2. Blended learning has a larger advantage

3. Different content and learner types

4. Educational online interactions enhance learning

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

BLENDED LEARNING

1. Learners who took all or part of their class online performed better

2. Blended learning has a larger advantage

3. Different content and learner types

4. Educational online interactions enhance learning

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

BLENDED LEARNING

1. Learners who took all or part of their class online performed better

2. Blended learning has a larger advantage

3. Different content and learner types

4. Educational online interactions enhance learning

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

WHY BLEND?

WHY BLEND?

Additional ‘on task’ learning time

Interactive materials

Opportunities for collaboration

Reflective elements

Improved results across disciplines and learning styles

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

WHY BLEND?

Additional ‘on task’ learning time

Interactive materials

Opportunities for collaboration

Reflective elements

Improved results across disciplines and learning styles

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

WHY BLEND?

Additional ‘on task’ learning time

Interactive materials

Opportunities for collaboration

Reflective elements

Improved results across disciplines and learning styles

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

WHY BLEND?

Additional ‘on task’ learning time

Interactive materials

Opportunities for collaboration

Reflective elements

Improved results across disciplines and learning styles

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

WHY BLEND?

Additional ‘on task’ learning time

Interactive materials

Opportunities for collaboration

Reflective elements

Improved results across disciplines and learning styles

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

WHY BLEND?

Additional ‘on task’ learning time

Interactive materials

Opportunities for collaboration

Reflective elements

Improved results across disciplines and learning styles

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development (2009)

WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE?

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Hubs and Spokes Project

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Lectures

Presentation of content

Tutorials

Application and analysis of material

Laboratories

Hands-on experiments

Assessment

Written reports, group design project, examinations

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Lectures

ActivePassive

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

http://www.etutors-portal.net/homepage_components/resources/Blendedlearning.jpg

Tutorials

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Laboratories

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Assessment Lecture quizzes

Reflections

Authentic activities

Collaborative design

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Assessment Lecture quizzes

Reflections

Authentic activities

Collaborative design

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Assessment Lecture quizzes

Reflections

Authentic activities

Collaborative design

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Assessment Lecture quizzes

Reflections

Authentic activities

Collaborative design

BLENDED LEARNING IN ACTION

Assessment Lecture quizzes

Reflections

Authentic activities

Collaborative design

BLENDED LEARNING

“the single greatest unrecognised trend in higher education

today”Young, 2002 (as cited in Garrison & Kanuka, 2004)

BLENDED LEARNING

REFERENCES

Garrison, R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended Learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, Washington, D.C., 2009. Retrieved October 30, 2009 from: http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

FOR MORE INFORMATION

Dr Kim Blackmore

X50411, Ian Ross R223, kim.blackmore@anu.edu.au

Lauren Kane

X55645, Ian Ross R230, lauren.kane@anu.edu.au

Debbie Pioch

X58020, Ian Ross R230, debbie.pioch@anu.edu.au