State of Cooperatives
in Region 1
Dagupan Extension Office
There was a slight increase in the number of registered cooperatives of 90 coops (2010-11); 74 (2011-12); 61 (2012-13). Percentage wise, the trend is slightly decreasing 1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1 2 3 4
1172
1262
1336
1397
7.67 % 5.86 % 4.86 %
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
123077 338462 338462 338462
199126
405514 409147
281511Target
Accomplishment
2010 2011 2012 2013
There was an increase of 103.54% between FY 2010-11; .895% increase between 2011-13; and -0.31% decrease between 2012-13.
-
1,000,000,000
2,000,000,000
3,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
5,000,000,000
6,000,000,000
7,000,000,000
3,922,267,686
4,396,701,769
5,753,228,890
6,814,951,907
2010 2011 2012 2013
12.09 30.85 18.45
There was an increase in total assets in FY 2011 (12.09%); 2012 (30.85 2013 (18.45) however, percentage wise , 2013 decreased by 18.45% as compared to 2012 Total Assets
-
1,000,000,000
2,000,000,000
3,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
5,000,000,000
6,000,000,000
3,015,112,556
3,570,108,493
4,219,382,267
5,815,027,987
2010 2011 2012 2013
The volume of business increased by 18.40% in 2011, 18.18% IN 2012 and 37.81 in 2013.%
18.40 % 18.18 % 37.81 %
Trend in Graduation to Micro-Small
0
200
400
600
800
531671
572648
Micro
0
50
100
150
200
80 7392
198
Small
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013
Except in 2012, micro cooperatives continue to increase in 2010, 2011 and 2013.
Small cooperatives doubled in number in 2013. Except in 2011 where small cooperatives decreased slightly
0
100
200
80 7392
198
Small
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
10
20
30
40
50
2638
44 43
Medium
Trend in Graduation to Small-Medium
2010 2011 2012 2013
The medium size cooperatives increased in 2011 and 2012 and slightly decreased in 2013
Trend in Graduation to Medium - Large
0
10
20
30
40
50
26
3844 43
Medium
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2010 2011 2012 2013
5 8 11
29Large
Large cooperatives steadily increased in 2011 and 2012 and doubled in 2013
1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1172
1262
13361397
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
200
400
600
800
1000
645 687 716
890
Reports
2010 2011 2012 2013
YearNo. of
Operating Coops
Reports %
2010 1172 645 58.61
2011 1262 687 56.73
2012 1336 716 66.61
2013 1397 890
Percentage Compliance to
Mandatory Reports
Assumption 100% Target of Operating Coops the average
compliance is 60.65 %
If the target is 80% of the total Operating
Cooperatives
YearNo. of
Operating Coops
Reports %
645 73.24
2010 938 687 64.52011 1110 716 83.252012 1069 890 83.252013 1118
Coop Branches & Satellite
Name of Coop No. of BranchesNo. of
Satellite
NSCC 13
SACDECO 8 1
Sacred Heart SC 10
St. Lucy MPC 4
Sto. Domingo Devt Coop 4
La Union Ladies Coop 2
Tubao Credit Coop 1
PANELCO I 9
Adventist MPC 1
TOTAL 39 14
Laboratory Coops
ProvinceNo. of Lab
Coop
Pangasinan 2
La Union 1
Ilocos Sur 1
Ilocos Norte -
Total 4
2013 Millionaire Cooperatives
Series1
020406080
100120
2013 Pang La Union
I. Sur I. Norte
0105
3937
31
Series1
0
20
40
60
80
100
2010Pang
La UnionI. Sur
I. Norte
0
98
32 27 24
2012 Millionaire Cooperatives
Top 15 Millionaire Cooperatives
Name of Coop Address Amt. of PUC1.Calasiao Plant & Related Co. EMPC Pangasinan 247,353,520.722. Tubao Credit Cooperative La Union 210,104,479.513. Sta. Cruz Savings & Dev’t. Coop Ilocos Sur 139,892,272.914. Lingayen Catholic Credit Coop Pangasinan 111,576,298.315. Government of Laoag Employees Development Coop Ilocos Norte 92,657,000.00
Top 15 Millionaire Cooperatives
Name of Coop AddressAmt. of
PUC6. Pangasinan State University MPC Pangasinan 47,587,380.007. Sacred Heart Savings Coop Ilocos Sur 45,137,652.77
8. Fatima (Vigan) MPC Ilocos Sur 40,423,888.009. Nueva Segovia Consortium of Cooperatives Ilocos Sur 39,325.153.98
10. Saint Augustine MPC Ilocos Sur 31,718,641.24
Top 15 Millionaire Cooperatives
Name of Coop AddressAmt. of
PUC11. Metro Vigan MPC Hospital Ilocos Sur 27,026,000.0012. Saint Louis Development Coop La Union 25,208,600.00
13. San Joaquin MPC Ilocos Norte 24,374,707.001414. Ilocos Norte PNP, Ladies & Civilian Emplys MPC Ilocos Norte 23,244995.26
15. Multi Purpose Cooperative of State Auditors La Union 22,821,701.63
ProvinceNo. of
Accredited EA
No. of Accredited Mediator/ Conciliator
No. of Accredited TP
Pang. 7 - 1
La Union 7 - 1
I.Sur 1 15 1
I. Norte 2 - 1
Total 17 15 3
Accreditations
Province NRAmended
Issued CGSNo. of coops
No. of TA provided to coops
P 4 3 48 48 365
LU 1 0 16 16 123
IS 0 2 29 29 198
IN 3 3 26 26 193
Total 8 8 118 118 907
CDA-DAR Partnership Program
Accomplishment as of Dec.
31, 2013
Province BCC CMG FM LVR PMESPara legal
Orientation Activities
P 12 1 2 2 4 1 3
LU 3 1 2 1 1 - 2
IS 8 1 1 2 - - 1
IN 4 3 2 4 3 - 1
Total 27 6 7 9 8 1 7
CDA-DAR Partnership Program
Accomplishment as of Dec.
31, 2013
Summary
1. There was a slight increase in the number of registered cooperatives between FY 2010-2013
2. There was wide increase of membership in 2011, slight increase in 2012 and a decrease was observed in 2013.
3. Total Assets were found to be increasing from 2010-2013
4. The volume of business increased steadily from 2010-2013
Summary5. The trend in graduation to micro-small from
2011-2013 is “decrease-increase-increase”; medium cooperatives was seen as “increase –increase and slight decrease”; large cooperatives “ increase-increase and doubled increase”
6. Based from a 100% target of operating cooperatives, the compliance on report submission is 60.65% while on an 80% target of OC the compliance rate is 73.66
7. Two years without report is considered non operating cooperatives
Summary
7. Around .952 % increase in the number of millionaire cooperatives
8. Small number of accredited external auditors, mediator/Conciliator and accredited training providers
9. CDA and DAR provided 1224 various technical assistance
Recommendations
• Ranking top cooperatives in the region
• Conduct research to find out strategies of cooperatives graduating to small, medium and large category
• Conduct social marketing of cooperatives
• Conduct research what causes the short term life of cooperatives registered
Recommendations
• Issuance of show cause orders with supporting documents aided by inspection reports
• Conversion of associate members to regular members
• Guided by inspection, determine cooperatives that used as tax shelter or labor shelter
Recommendations
• Prepare a matrix of working population vis-à-vis members in cooperatives. Areas with less coop membership can be tapped to join existing cooperatives
• Study assets of the cooperatives – how much is invested? How much is receivables? How much fund is idle? Determine efficiency in the use of resources, Know who is the contributor of money it loan or from members.
Recommendations
• Exert more effort to make your assets productive at least 20% increase
• Filling up of PAR/SAR should be based on MC and template.
• Orient cooperatives on how to fill up reports
• Coops tend to rate higher which is misleading to the policy making bodies
Recommendations
• Coops should integrate economic and social outcome to their cooperative devt framework
• Any investment or deposits in the fed central fund is considered volume of business
• Give a picture to federations and unions so that they can work together and contribute to improve performance of their affiliates and increase appreciation of what the Authority is doing
Recommendations• Inspection reports should be analyzed with a
matrix of the strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies and irregularities that need to be rectified
• The inspection and examination of cooperatives should be performed judiciously and with utmost impartiality
• When the operations of big cooperatives become complex , important controls must be in placed
Recommendations
• Increase of membership is retained thru merging and consolidation
• Reportorial reports are not merely for compliance but the cooperative can monitor its program of activities including those in the pursuance to their socio economic undertakings showing their progress and achievements
Recommendations
• The ETC should recommend a Training Plan to be incorporated to the Cooperative Development Plan
• A monitoring form should be used to monitor branches from other regions because geographically “nagpatung patung na”.
• Capture miscellaneous income as additional volume of business
Recommendations
• Use of Communication and Advocacy Plan
• Deliver quality service to both internal and external clients
www. cda.gov.ph
CBMIS e-cooptrade
powered by High Impact MPC
Maraming Salamat Po
Top Related