nrcncte.orgnrcncte.org/minutes_180th_NRC_meeting.doc · Web viewRJ-2042 Gurukul T.T. College,...

Minutes of 180th NRC Meeting Held from 23rd March to 26th March, 2011,31at March to 1st April and 9th April to 11th April 2011

nrcxThe 180th Meeting of the Northern Regional Committee (NRC), National Council for Teacher Education

(NCTE) was held on March, 23rd March to 26th March 2011at NRC, Jaipur, at New Delhi from 31st March to 1st April 2011 and from 9th April to 11th April 2011 at NRC, Jaipur.

In pursuance of the Gazette Notification No.213 dated 25.08.2010, NRC has been terminated under Section 21(2)(a) of NCTE Act, 1993 and the powers and duties on behalf of the Northern Regional Committee are being exercised and performed under Section 21(2)(b) by Shri Hasib Ahmad, former Member Secretary, NCTE.

The following member and convenor were present:

1. Shri Hasib Ahmad, Chairman, NRC, NCTE2. Shri R.D. Sharma, Regional Director, NRC, NCTE

With the permission of Shri Hasib Ahmad, Chairman, Shri R.D. Sharma (Convenor) presented the Agenda before the Committee. Item-wise decisions taken are as follows:-

AGENDA ITEM No. 180.01: Confirmation of the minutes of 179th NRC Meeting

S. No Cases Decision of NRC1. The minutes of 179th NRC Meeting held from February,

18-20-2011 has been uploaded on the website of NRC.Minutes of 179th meeting are confirmed.

AGENDA ITEM:-180.02.CONSIDERATION OF COURT CASES

Sr. No.

File Code No.

Name of the Institution Name of the Course

Decision of NRC

1. UP-2193

Deen Dayal College, Dwarikapuri, Plot No.- 89, Mustafabad, 4th Km. Stone, Bhopa Road, Muzaffarnagar- Uttar Pradesh

M.Ed. The representation of the Institution dated 10.06.2010 and subsequent reminder dated 6.12.2010 has been considered, in the light of the orders of the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad dated 22.02.2010 in Writ Petition No. 8506 of 2010. The case of the Institution is that it was issued a letter of intent prior to recognition (Conditional Recognition) by NRC, NCTE on 14.08.2007. The Institution was required to appoint Faculty thereafter and submit the details to NRC, on the basis of which formal recognition order was to be issued. The Institution was specifically asked not to admit student without obtaining unconditional recognition. In the event of non-submission of any details about Faculty by the Institution, NRC vide its letter dated 16.07.2009 refused the recognition to the Institution for M.Ed. Course vide its letter dated 16.08.2009. However, this refusal order was set aside by the appellate authority, which directed NRC to consider the case of the Institution after examining the Staff Profile that the Institution claimed to have submitted to NRC. The NRC considered the Staff Profile and found in its 148th Meeting held on 28-30th

August, 2009 that the staff appointed by the Institution was not as per NCTE Norms and no Reader was appointed by the Institution despite a specific provision to this effect in the NCTE Norms. However, the Institution submitted a revised list of the Faculty, which was duly approved by the Affiliating University vide their letter dated 3.08.2008. It was on the strength of this revised list that the NRC

1


issued order for recognition with effect from the academic session 2009-2010. 2. Consequent upon the said orders of the Hon’ble High Court dated

22.02.2010, the Faculty list submitted by the Institution on 25.02.2008 was again examined, along with the representation of the Institution dated 10.06.2010. It has been noted that the Institution after receipt of Conditional Recognition, got affiliation of the University, which was duly approved by the Government of U.P. from the academic session 2006-07 vide their letter dated 28.07.2008. The Faculty was appointed by a duly Constituted Selection Committee having a representation of the University and thereafter the formal approval of the University was also obtained vide their letter dated 6.11.2007. However, fact remains that the Faculty appointed by the Institution, though approved by the University, was not upto the mark in terms of NCTE Norms. No Reader was appointed. The three lecturers are those who were working in B.Ed, Deptt. of the Institution. The name of these lecturers was also approved by the University for their B.Ed. Course vide University letter dated 15.04.2006. Thus, it is evident that no faculty was appointed for M.Ed. Course and those for B.Ed. Course have also been shown in the M.Ed. Faculty. The Institution has not given any details of the candidate, who were appointed for B.Ed. Course, in the consequential vacancy, once they were appointed/shifted to M.Ed. Course. Moreover, since the B.Ed. Principal has been shown in the list of M.Ed. Course as well (namely Dr. Usha Anand), it is clear that the Institution did not appoint any Professor and Reader for the M.Ed. Course, with experience of teaching at M.Ed. Level, which is a must as per NCTE Norms.

3. It is thus evident that the Institution did not run their M.Ed. Course during 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 in accordance with the NCTE Norms, even when formal order of recognition was not issued. No leniency can therefore be shown on the consideration that they obtained University affiliation and approval of Government of UP for this Institution for the session 2006-07.

The NRC order dated 7.10.2009 granting formal recognition to the Institution for M.Ed. Course from the session 2009-10 is therefore in order and no change is warranted to pre-date the recognition on the consideration that affiliation was given by the University and Institution admitted students for the Course during these sessions.

2. NRCAPP-220

Dr. Vishambhar singh Pratap Singh Mahavidyalay, Bilhaur,Vill-Gadhewa Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh

D.El.Ed. The documents submitted vide letter received on 4.03.2010 with respect to the deficiency letter dated 4.01.2010 were considered afresh. NRC decided that the Institution may submit the following documents within 30 days.1. A notified copy of the change in Land Use Certificate (CLU)

issued under section 143 of Land and Revenue Act, UP.3. UP-

2783S.S. Degree College, Gopalpura, Tehsil: Fatehabad, Agra Road, Shamsabad, Uttar Pradesh

B.Ed. As per orders of the Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition No. 7614 of 2011, inspection of the Institution be conducted. Institution be asked to submit the required fee of Rs. 40,000/-.VT Constituted.

4. NRCAPP-201

Delhi Institute of Management and Technology, Plot No.- 236/243, Village- Kakra, Post- Muradnagar, Tehsil- Modinagar, District- Ghaziabad-201206, Uttar Pradesh

D.El.Ed. The Institution applied for recognition of D.El.Ed. Course. The Institution has already been recognized for a B.Ed. Course from the academic session 2008-09 vide NRC order dated 10.09.2008. The course is therefore an additional course and as per Clause 8(3) of the NCTE Regulation, 2009 an Institution is entitled for an additional course, after the completion of three academic sessions of the respective Course. As such, the Institution is entitled to apply for the D.El.Ed. Course before the ‘cut off date prescribed for submission of application in the years succeeding the completion of three academic sessions’. The application of the Institution has therefore been

2


considered afresh, in accordance with the order of the Hon’ble Court and following observations were made:(a) The Institution submitted a building plan, a photocopy of the blue print approved by the Pradhan, Gram Panchayat, Kekra, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad. An original copy of the document was submitted by the Institution for recognition of Additional Intake to its existing B.Ed. Course. This blue print indicates that built up area of the Institution is 2146.69 Sq. Meter. It is not understood as to how the photocopy of the document, now submitted indicates the built up area as 3068 Sq. Moreover, since, despite asking for the original map, the Institution did not submit the original blue print and since this copy is at variance to the original blue print available to the NRC in its other file no. UP-3440, the Institution apparently submitted a forged photocopy of the building plan. The covered area in the plan has been tampered/changed to reflect it as 3068 Sq. Meter, even when the dimensions of various rooms/Halls etc. are the same as that in the original map, reflecting a built up area as 2146.69 Sq. Meter. This was apparently done to meet the requirement of NCTE Norms, on paper by way of forged documentation.(b) Even, this blue print with built up area as 2146.69 Sq. Meter is at variance with another blue print submitted by the Institution earlier to NRC for the basic unit of B.Ed. course. This blue print approved by Pradhan, Gram Panchayat on 20.08.2007 (same authority) is for the same piece of land i.e. Khasra No. 243 (area 0.875 Acre) and Khasra no. 236 (Area 0.170 Acre) located in the same village but is having a built up area of 1526 Sq. Meter. These two blue prints are approved on 20.08.2007 by the same authority for the same building located in the same land but having a different built up area.It is thus evident that the institution submitted forged documents while applying for recognition of the D.El.Ed. Course. The institution be therefore asked to show cause on the above deficiency before its application is rejected. A show cause notice be also issued to the Institution for its existing B.Ed. Course (File No. UP-2817) on the above ground under section 17 of the NCTE Act.Further legal action against the institution be taken after receipt of reply to the show cause notice.

5. NRCAPP-422

Shir Mahavir Singh Bahuddesiya Mahavidyalaya, Plot No. 679, Village- Nagla Banwari, Post- Mainpuri, Tehsil- Mainpuri, District- Mainpuri- 205001, Uttar Pradesh

D.El.Ed. After consideration of the documents in accordance with orders of the Hon’ble Court. NRC decided to conduct the inspection of the institution. V.T. constituted.

6. RJ-200RJ-1267

Maharana Pratap Teachers Training College, Baseri, District-Dholpur, Rajasthan

B.ED., B.ED. Add.,

As per the direction of Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan dated 05.03.2011, the Visiting Team Members comprising of Prof. B.R. Kukreti,and Dr. Santosh Arora, appointed by the NCTE, NRC, Jaipur and Prof. B.S. Rathore representative of the Vice Chancellor of Rajasthan University visited Maharana Pratap Teachers Training College, Baseri, Dholpur on 23.03.2011 at 1.00 P.M.The members of the verification team had informed the date and time of the inspection to the management of the College well-in-time. But at the scheduled date and time of inspection, the College was closed even though, it was a working day. No student, teachers, office staff and members of the management committee were present in the college. At the time of the visit of the team only one watchman namely Sri. Nihal Singh was

3


present in the College. He told that he was working there for the last one month only and no college was functioning, since then Mr. C.H. Sharma, Manager of the College informed on telephone (by Cell no. 9414585188) that due to agitation of the students and guardians, the College Management Committee have decided to close the college and therefore they are unable to co-operate with the VT members for inspection. The local people were not aware about any agitation from students and parents. They also informed that they never saw the regular classes being held in this college building. VT members also found that there was a signboard of the college. Building of the college was under construction and un-plastered. Some classrooms were found without doors and windows. Neighbors informed that they never saw any classes being conducted in this college.In view of the above, position may be brought to the notice of the Hon’ble Court, show cause notice be issued under section 17 of the NCTE Act in respect of 200 seats of B.Ed. Course, in view of the finding of the inspection team, that the courses was not being run by the Institution as per NCTE Norms.The reply to the show cause notice must be given within 30 days . (University’s Action in transferring the students of the current session to other institutions endorsed.)

7. RJ-532, RJ-794 & RJ-801

Laxmi Bai Mahila Teachers Training College, Jamva Ram Garh, Jaipur, Rajasthan

B.ED., S.T.C & N.T.T

In pursuance to the direction of Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan dated 05.03.2011, the verification team members- Prof. B.R. Kukreti, Dr. Santosh Arora appointed by the NCTE, NRC Jaipur and Prof. B.S. Rathore representative of Vice-Chancellor of Rajasthan University, Jaipur have visited Laxmi Ram Garh, Jaipur on 22.03.2011 at 11:30 AM.The members of the verification team had informed the date and time of the inspection to the Management of the College well-in-time, but at the scheduled date and time of the inspection the college was found closed. No students, teachers, members of the office staff and members of the Management Committee were present in the college.At the time of visit of VT Members only one watchmen Mr. Jagdish Sharma and one Mali Mr. Dunger Singh were present in the College premises. They told to the VT members that the College is closed about since last 20 days. Mr. Sita Ram Pareek, Manager of the College informed on telephone (by Cell No. 9928238921) that due to some disturbance from the side of students and their guardians the college management and the members of the administrative Committee of the college had decided to close the college for the time being. Therefore, they were unable to co-operate with the VT members in the process of inspection till the college reopens. The V.T. members also enquired from the local people and they were informed that they never saw the regular classes in the college building. Local people also denied any agitation in the College during the last one year.In view of the above, position may be brought to the notice of the Hon’ble Court, show cause notice be issued under section 17 of the NCTE Act, in respect of all these courses e.g. B.Ed., STC and NTT, in view of the finding of the

4


Inspection team that the courses are not being run by the Institution, as per NCTE Norms, University Action in transpiring the students of the current session to other institutions be endorsed.

8. NRCAPP-294

Maa Buddha National Mahavidyalaya Samiti, 275, 276, 089, 115, 192, Vill- Muniya Makadumpur, Post- Nizamabad, Dist- Azamgarh, U.P

D.El.Ed. Consequent upon the orders of the Hon’ble Court reply of the institution w.r.t. the Show Cause Notice has been carefully considered on merit and following observations made : 1. The total built up area indicated in the building plan is only

1359.69 Sq. Meter, which is less than the required built up area of 1500 Sq. Meter as per NCTE Norms for D.El.Ed. Course. The existing built up area is even further less (1111.11 Sq. meter) as 248.58 Sq. Feet are was still proposed to be constructed at the time of submission of application.

2. As per CLU, issued by the SDM, Nizamabad, Azamgarh, on 20.06.2009, the land and its existing building has been in the possession of the Society for the last over 10 years. The institution has not indicated its land use during this period. As the name suggests the institution was earlier having a degree college or a school running in this building. If so, then its detail may be submitted alongwith a certificate from the District Education Officer and the university, having affiliating Jurisdiction in the area, that they are not having any school or degree college in this area.

The institution be issued Show Cause Notice on the above grounds for a reply within 30 days.

9. HR-961HR-1614HR-980

I.P.J. College of Education, Street – Sampla, VPO – Ismaila, Delhi Rohtak Road, Rohtak, Haryana-124001

B.Ed.M.EdD.Ed.

The college was recognized for B.Ed. and J.B.T. courses ever since 2007. The institution applied for M.Ed. Course in April, 2008 and the inspection of the institution was conducted under section 15(1) of NCTE Act on 16th October, 2008. The report of the inspection team was very damaging in respect of the availability of the infrastructural facilities in the institution. As such, NRC while deciding to refuse the recognition for M.Ed. Course decided to get the inspection of the institution for two existing B.Ed. and JBT courses under section 17 of the NCTE Act, in view of the adverse comments of the inspection team. Accordingly, the institution was issued a Show Cause Notice on 25.05.2009 indicating various deficiencies and asking the petitioner to make representation to the Show Cause Notice as to why their recognition for B.Ed. and D.Ed. may not be withdrawn. After consideration of the reply of the institution, the recognition of the institution for the B.Ed. and D.Ed. was also withdrawn, on specific grounds of the deficiencies observed by the NRC.

2. The institution in the meanwhile moved to the Court and the Hon’ble Court in its order dated 26.08.2009 quashed the orders of the NRC withdrawing the recognition of the B.Ed. and J.B.T. courses, with the observations that the withdrawal of the B.Ed. and D.Ed. was not according to the law and was not based upon actual and real facts and it smelled extraneous consideration. The Hon’ble Court also directed the Respondent No. 1 and 2 i.e. NCTE Chairman and NRC through Regional Director to re-consider the matter by affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and then pass a speaking order.

3. Consequently upon this decision, the NRC issued vide letter dated 17th December, 2009 conveying the deficiencies as contained in the withdrawal order and asking the institution to send the reply within period of two months. In its reply dated 16.02.2010, the institution did not reply to any of the specific deficiencies pointed to them but simply said that the inspection was done after the withdrawal and the CD and the answers to various points raised in the Show Cause Notice were available with the NRC office and in case, the NRC wants any information it may be specifically

5


pointed out.4. Accordingly, the entire case file of the institution , the inspection

conducted at the time of recognition for M.Ed. Course and the CD submitted by the Institution and the reply earlier submitted by the Institution and CD now submitted by the Institution showing infrastructure has been carefully considered. After carefull consideration NRC made following observation:-

(a) The land and the present building of the Institution is in the name of the society. As per NCTE Regulation, 2009, the society was required to transfer the land in the name of the institution. The institution in its reply dated 24.06.2009 mentioned that they would submit the documents of the land transfer in the name of the college within period of 90 days. The institution has failed to do so and no document whatsoever has bee submitted to show that the land of the society has been transferred in the name of the institution. This is a violation of clause 8(7)(IV) of NCTE Regulation, 2009.

(b) In its application for B.Ed. course, the institution submitted building plan located at the land bearing Khewat No. 334/229, Khasra No. 395 and Killa No. 982, 983 & 984. The details of this land having a built up area of 1900 Sq. meter has been submitted in the Affidavit initially as well subsequent to the inspection. However at the time of inspection, the institution submitted a building plan having a different land detail e.g. Khewat No. 398, Khasra No. 431 and Killa No. 902. It is not understood as to why two set of building plans have been submitted and what is the exact details of the land where its B.Ed. course is being continued.

(c) Again while submitting application for D.Ed. course in the same month i.e. September-2007, the institution submitted the same land document as at Para-(1) above, with total area as 1900 Sq. Meter. However, subsequent to inspection the institution submitted the other blue print with Khasra No. 399, Khetoni No. 431 and Killa No. 902, having a total built up area of 3004 Sq. Meter. This again is not understood as to whether the institution is located in a building having built up area as 1900 Sq. Meter or it is located in a land having 3004 Sq. Meter, the institution needs to explain its position.

(d) The CLU, submitted by the institution is in form of a NOC

from District Town Planner. However, it is for the land bearing Khewat No. 398, Khetoni No. 431 and Killa No. 902, and that too for a portion of this land having an area 10 Kanal and 17 Marle. As such, the CLU is neither for the original plot nor for the total size of the plot.

5. In its reply dated 24.06.2009, the institution alleged that the inspection team for the M.Ed. Course did not see the entire college and that the VT members asserted that they had come to see the infrastructure made by the institution for the M.Ed. course only. This is contrary to the fact, as a perusal of the inspection team report clearly points out that the institution had only 4 class rooms and a poor science lab, and very poor psychology lab. They also pointed out that, the floor of the entire building is incomplete and filled with bricks only. They also pointed out that there is no adequate infrastructure for the students in all the class rooms. This clearly indicates that the available physical infrastructure of the institution, its instructional infrastructure was thoroughly inadequate in terms of the NCTE Norms. This has been however established by a careful observations of the CD, submitted by the

6


institution itself, on the basis which, following observations are made:-i. The furniture of the class rooms is not appropriate. It is

inadequate and comprises of small size long tables attached with benches, which are meant for school children and not for grown up students of B.Ed/J.B.T Course.

ii. The institution has no Science and Maths Resource Centre. CD clearly shows display of scientific equipments and apparatuses on removable table, arranged for the purpose of the inspection and had no fixed structure with experimental table having water and drainage system. It also lacked proper storage for equipment, apparatus and consumables. Similarly, psychology lab was also thoroughly inadequate. The institution displayed psychology tests on table, for taking CD. The institution has claimed that it has got 3000 Sq. feet builtup area, but the inspection team categorically observed that building had inadequate built up area at the time of inspection on 16.10.2008. The inspection team pointed out that the institution had no Multipurpose Hall. The institution has not given any explanations whatsoever to establish that it does have a multipurpose hall. Non availability of multipurpose hall shows that the institution is not running as per NCTE Norms. The size of the class room as mentioned in the inspection team report is 14×18 Sq. Meter, which means that the class rooms size is 252 Square Meter i.e. more than 2500 Square feet. A simple perusal of the CD submitted by the Institution establishes that room size is not that much and therefore its size is 14 X 18 Sq. feet i.e. 252 Sq. meters only. In the VTR the sq. feet dimension was corrected by pen to read as a sq meter. This is against the prescribed norms of NCTE as the size of class room is prescribed 500 Sq. feet. The institution has claimed that it has an adequate library with 9926 books. In its reply dated 24.06.2009 it, asserted that signature of the VT members were in Accession Register at the time of inspection for availability of 7640 books. The institution charged the VT members that they gave a false statement, as they were asked to sign the Accession Register shown to them, which they did not sign. The observations of the VT members in respect of the availability of the books in the library is very categorical and they said that the number of books in the library as 6903 were reflected in the records, but the library did not possess all these books. No issue register was shown to the visiting team. The institution submitted that they had the language learning lab, but the charge of the institution that the VT members gave a false statement in this regard could not be accepted as practically, there was no lab seen in the CD submitted by the Institution. The language lab as part of the ICT Centre has not been developed at all as per recommendation of NCTE as contained in itsmanual organizing Teaching Learning Resourses in Teacher Training Institutions.

3. The claim of the institution to continue its recognition for B.Ed. and D.El.Ed. (J.B.T.), on the ground that the inspection team at the time of inspection for granting recognition to the course found facility as satisfactory, cannot be accepted by NRC as a teacher training institution is not only required to provide infrastructure as per norms of NCTE Act but is also required to upgrade the facilities as and when NCTE Norms require to do so. The institution may be asked to specifically reply to the above points and a show cause notice be issued for the purpose.

The reply of the institution must reach within 30 days of the issue of Show Cause Notice. The reply is to be placed before NRC immediately thereafter which may take a decision in the matter. In case the reply is not satisfactory, the observations of the NRC

7


would be conveyed to the Appellate Authority, which may be requested to give an opportunity to the Institution to make a representation before the Appellate Authority. This is in view of the specific orders of the Hon’ble High Court that the decision may be taken by NCTE Head Quarter and NRC.

10. RJ-1798

Swami Gangadas Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidyalaya, Kheda, Norangpura, Virat Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan

B.Ed. Consequent upon orders of the Hon’ble Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur dated 13.12.2010, the petitioner’s Institution was required to make fresh application for seeking recognition for B.Ed. course. On submission of the application, NCTE was required to consider it as per the provisions of the law. The Institution did not make a fresh application, giving details of the present infrastructure available to them as per NCTE Regulation, 2009. The application of the Institution dated 26.07.2010 wherein the Institution submitted a certified copy of the VT report for consideration of the application, was perused and NRC decided that the institution be asked to apply by giving full details about existing facilities available with them. In the meanwhile recommendations of the State Government of Rajasthan may be obtained about recognition of the Institution for conducting the course in the forthcoming Session 2011-12, as required under NCTE regulation, 2009.

AGENDA ITEM:-180.03.CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL CASES

Sr. No.

File Code No.


Decision of NRC

1. NRCAPP-312

Dev Bhoomi Institute of Applied Science, Plot No- 801 850 851, Village- Navgaon, Post- Manduwala, District- Dehradun- 248007, U.A

B.Ed. As per orders of the Appellate Authority dated 01.06.2010, the institutions application was considered on merit for a B.Ed. course and following observations were made : 1. The institution has a huge complex conducting a large no. of

courses, out of which a building with the name “Dev Bhumi Institute of Applied Science (DBIAS) located at Khasra No. 850, 851, 852 and 801 part has been earmarked for conducting B.Ed. course. The exact area of these four Khasra Nos. has not been indicated by the Society, so as to establish that they have earmarked 2500 Sq. Meter of land area alongwith the building thereon for B.Ed. course. Moreover a certified copy of the land document of these Khasra No. has not been submitted yet. The land documents are only the photocopies of the documents duly notarized and not the certified copy (Nakal) issued by Sub-Registrar lands.

2. The building plan of DBIAS building submitted by the society is located in Khasra Nos. 301, 302 846Kha, 856 Kha, 850kha, 851, 852kha, which indicates that the building plan is not only of the DBIAS building but includes other building constructed by the society in the Complex. The building plan is therefore not accepted as the building plan for the proposed B.Ed. course.

3. The society is at present running a BBA, BCA, B.Sc. (H.), B.Sc. (Biotech) course in the DBIAS building, which they have resolved to earmark for B.Ed. course. This situation is not acceptable, as the institution intends to conducts its B.Ed. course in one of the existing building without having any alternative plan to shift the course being run in that building. Moreover the building itself is not suited for a B.Ed. course as it has no Multipurpose Hall of 2000 Sq.ft., as per NCTE Norms. The total built up area earmarked for the B.Ed. course is much less than the required 1500 Sq. Meter, as

8


per NCTE Norms for B.Ed. Course. Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 14(3) (b) be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

2. NRCAPP-76

Himalyan Institute of Education and Technology, Plot No. 977-978, 980-984, 994-1000, Street No. Amardweep, Village – Jilasu, Post Office – Jilasu Via Langasu, Tehsil – Pokhari, District – Chamoli - 246446, (UA)

B.Ed. The reply of the institution dated 15.04.2010 w.r.t. the letter of deficiencies issued on 15.01.2010 has been considered as per orders of the Appellate Authority dated 17.09.2010 and following observations made : The institution has not submitted a certified copy of the land documents. The copy submitted is the attested photocopy, and cannot be accepted in lieu of original certified copy (Nakal) to be issued by the Sub-Registrar Lands. (The institutions application UR 204 for the same course in the same premises is separately under consideration and consequent upon the orders of the Hon’ble Court, a Visiting Team has been constituted).

3. UP-1199

Shri Ram College, Opp. - Almaspur Telephone Exchange, Ring Road, Muzaffar Nagar, UP

B.Ed. Order of the Appellate authority be carried out immediately.

4. NRCAPP344

OM BIO Sciences and Pharma College A Faculty of B.Ed., 198,199, Panchayanpur, Roorkee, Haridwar, Uttarakhand- 249402

B.ED As per orders of the Appellate Authority dated 19.11.2010, the institution be asked to submit a copy of its reply dated 10.03.2010 alongwith its enclosures for further consideration of the matter.

5. PB-506 Sant Baba Bhag Singh Memorial Girls College of Education, VPO – Sukhanand, Tehsil – Bagha Purana, Distt. – Moga, Punjab

D.Ed. As per orders of the Appellate Authority dated 19.11.2010 a Show Cause Notice be issued to the institution under section 14(3)(b) on the following grounds : 1. The institutions was given a letter of intent prior to recognition on

09.08.2008 and vide Appellate Authority order dated 03.07.2009 NRC was required to examine the profile of the faculty, appointed subsequent to the issue of letter of Intent. However in the meanwhile the institution shifted its premises for which no prior approval was sought. The letter of intent prior to recognition already issued lost its validity on shifting of the premises.

2. The new premise of the institution was got inspected on 13.05.2010. Following deficiencies were noted on the basis of the inspection. a) The new premises has been earmarked for B.Ed. and D.Ed.

courses both. The building plan of the new premises does not give the exact built up area of the building. The Visiting Team pointed out availability of 15,196 Sq. ft. of area which is not sufficient for B.Ed. and ETT (D.El.Ed.) course for which a built up area of 3000 Sq. Meter is required. The built up area is even less than what is required for a B.Ed. course, i.e. 1500 Sq. Meter.

b) The building plan submitted to the Visiting Team is not approved by a Competent Authority. It does not indicate the details of the land where the building is located.

c) The institution has not given any documents pertaining to the land where the new building has been constructed. The original land documents submitted alongwith application lost its validity once the institution was shifted to another place.

d) The Visiting Team after inspection recommended further time to the institution for making of the deficiencies, which indicates that the institution till the time of inspection on 13.05.2010 was not prepared for conducting the course.

e) The institution had only 550 books for its proposed ETT (D.El.Ed.) course, which is less than the required norms for 1000 books.

9


Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 15(3) (b) be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

6. UP-2637

Blooming Bud’s Degree College, Siktapur, Maniram, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh

B.Ed. (Additional)

As per orders of the Appellate Authority dated 23.12.2010, the application of the institution for Additional Intake to B.Ed. course was considered and following observations were made : a) The institution applied for recognition of B.Ed. course on

16.06.206 and submitted application for Additional Intake to this course on 03.10.2007. As such the institution applied for additional intake even before starting the course. The application was liable to be rejected at the initial stage itself as Additional Intake is given to an existing institution running the course.

b) The institution was given recognition for B.Ed. course (conditional recognition) on 27.01.2007 and could run only two academic sessions i.e. 2008-09 and 2009-10. It is yet to complete 3rd years of running the B.Ed. course and is thereof not eligible for grant of additional intake before completing 3 session of running.

c) As per NCTE Regulations, the institution applying for Additional Intake are required to obtains accreditation by NAAC (B-Grade). Hence the institution is not eligible for additional intake.

d) The institution is a Degree College and is having multi faculty courses. It has a total 14500 Sq. ft. of built up area earmarked for the B.Ed. course, as per Visiting Team report. However detailed break up of various rooms / lab has not been given in the essential date form to the Visiting Team to appreciate availability of the required built up area for the B.Ed. course. The Multipurpose Hall of the institution is of 80 Sq. Meter, which is much less than the required area of 2000 Sq. ft.

e) The institution has not submitted any map giving total built up area of the Degree College and the area earmarked for B.Ed. course.

f) The institution did not prepare the CD at the time of inspection as per requirement under NCTE Regulations.


7. RJ-2042

Gurukul T.T. College, Rajgarh Station Road, Near Oil Mill, Alwar – 301408 (Rajasthan)

B.Ed. As per Appellate Authority orders dated 13.01.2011, the case of the institution was considered on merit and following observations made : 1. The inspection team that visited the institution on 07.07.2008, did

not recommend the recognition of the institution, as it was not prepared till the time of inspection for running the course in terms of infrastructure facilities. a) The class rooms, labs were not properly furnished b) The labs were not developed with proper fixed structure,

experimental tables and proper facilities of water and drainage not developed.

c) The institution had only 1963 books, which is much less than the required 3000 books for a B.Ed. course.

2. The institution claimed in its affidavit that it had a total of 2000 Sq. Meter of built up area. However it has not been substantiated by proper certification as the building plan did not mention the total built up area and No “Completion Certificate” from a Competent Authority was submitted to indicate it.

3. The institution failed to show its original land documents to verify the veracity of the photocopies of the land documents submitted by the institution.


8. UR-25 Dronacharya Institute of B.Ed. As per decisions of the Appellate Authority dated 21.01.2011

10


Teacher Education, VPO- Dharmawla, Vikas Nagar, Shimla Bye Pass Road, Distt- Dehradun, Uttarakhand

speaking order be issued in corporating the rational of NRC and Appellate Authority which decided to withdraw the recognition in this case. The NRC orders in its minutes are self contained and so the orders of the Appellate Authority.

9. UP-2469

Swarna Jayanti Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Pipraich, Distt. – Gorakhpur, U.P.

B.Ed. As per decisions of the Appellate Authority dated 21.01.2011a speaking order be issued in corporating the rational of NRC and Appellate Authority which decided to withdraw the recognition in this case. The NRC orders in its minutes are self contained and so the orders of the Appellate Authority.

10. NRCAPP-40

Brahm Datt Dwiwedi Prabha Dwiwedi , Faizabad Road, Ramgarh Cahwani, Chawani, Harraiya Basti- 272127, U.P.

D.El.Ed.

The institution submitted a copy of the CLU, duly notarized and returned back the FDR’s. VT constituted.

AGENDA ITEM:-180.04.CONSIDERATION OF VTR UNDER SECTION 14 OF NCTE ACT, 1993

Sr. No.

File Code No.


Decision of NRC

1. NRCAPP-374

Maa Durga College, Plot No. 215, Vill- Muhammad Pur, Post- Sikandra, Tehsil- Agra, District- Agra- 282007, U.P.

D.El.Ed.

The VT report and CD taken at the time of Inspection has been examined and following observations were made:1. The Class room furniture comprising of long tables with long

benches, without back support is not proper for the College students.

2. The library has not been provided with adequate furniture as seating space. The class room tables/benches were kept for inspection purposes only.

3. The Multi-Purpose Hall has not been developed; it has no dais, raised platform and public address system; The furniture comprising of Plastic Lawn chairs is not appropriate.

4. The Institution has not developed Language Lab as Part of the ICT Resource Centre, as per recommendation of the NCTE as contained in its Manual for organisings Teacher Training Resources in Teacher Training Institutions.

5. The Institution is being developed as a College. However, no course has started yet. The Institution needs to provide full details of the courses that they have applied and the manner in which they would accommodate them in the present building. A certificate from Registrar of the University giving details of the courses proposed in the college may be submitted.

6. The Institution has built two buildings for the proposed D.El.Ed. course. The reason for having the course in two buildings and facilities developed for D.El.Ed. Course in two buildings separately may be provided with built up area of each of the two buildings separately.

11



2. NRCAPP140

Dr. Ambedkar Kumar Pahalwan Bal Vidya Mandir, Plot No. 122, VPO- Pandeypur Radhey, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Ghazipur, U.P

D.El.Ed.

Show Cause Notice be issued as to why application for recognition may not be refused as the institution failed to get its inspection done despite prior notice dated 6-08-2010 for inspection from 9th -14th August 2010

3. NRCAPP-159

Shree Satya College of Higher Education, Vill- Dhanupura, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P.

D,El.Ed.

The VT report and CD taken at the time of inspection has been carefully considered and following observations were made:-1. The Institution is being developed as a College. However, no

course has started yet. The Institution needed to provide full details of the courses that they have applied and the manner in which they would accommodate them in the present building, along with a certificate from Registrar of the University giving details of the courses proposed in the college.

2. The Institution has identified staff for the proposed D.El.Ed. Course. However, it is noted that Faculty appointment was required to be made by following due process of selection and the Selection Committee constituted for the purpose should have outside experts in the field of ‘Elementary Teacher Education’. Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 14(3) (b) be issued to the institution, for a reply in 30 days.

4. UP-2623

SUKHDAI SAMARAK B.ED COLLEGE, VILLAGE RATTUPURA, POST RATTUPURA, THAKURDWARA, MORADABAD-244601

B.T.C. The V.T. report and CD has been carefully considered and following observations made:1. The institution has not developed its ICT Resource Centre,

including Language Lab, as per recommendation of NCTE in its Manual for organisings Teacher Training Resources in Teacher Training Institutions.

2. The Computer Lab has not been properly developed. It has no proper Computer Chairs. The Class room chairs with side notes taking arrangement, were kept in the Computer Room making its totally non functional. It shows that Institution is not having proper Computer Room.

3. The Institution has no Multipurpose Hall. The size of one Seminar room which can be used as multipurpose hall is only 1300 Sq. Ft, which is not as per NCTE Norms.

4. The Institution has identified staff for the proposed D.El.Ed. Course. However, it is noted that Faculty appointment is required to be made by following due process of selection and the Selection Committee constituted for the purpose should have outside experts in the field of ‘Elementary Teacher Education’. Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 14(3) (b) be issued to the institution; time of 30 days be given for reply.

5. NRCAPP395

Venketeshwar Vidyajpeeth, Plot No.-5, Village – Dhillo, Post Office-Sultanpur,Tehsil-Solan, District-Solan, Himachal Pradesh-

D.E.L.Ed.

The visiting team report of the inspection of the institution conducted on 28.10.2010, the CD taken at the time of inspection was considered.

The visiting team report was positive and in consonance with the CD. NRC decided to issue a letter of intent prior to recognition under clause 7 (9) of the NCTE regulation, 2009.

6. NRCAPP-260

Shanti College of Education, Plot no. 1934, Vill- Kailash Nagar, Post- Nakroh, Tehsil- Amb, District-

D.E.C.Ed.

The V.T. report and CD has been carefully considered and following observations made:1. The Multipurpose hall of the Institution is of the size of 125 Sq.

Meter, which is much less than the required 2000 Sq. Ft. Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above

12


Daulatpur, Himachal Pradesh.

grounds under section 14(3) (b) be issued to the institution; time of 30 days be given for reply.

7. NRCAPP-240

Jai Bharti College of Education, 524, Loharin, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

D.EL.ED

The visiting team report dated 30.10.2010, the CD taken at the time of inspection was considered. The visiting team report was positive and in consonance with the CD. NRC decided to issued a letter of intent prior to recognition, under class 7 (9) of the NCTE regulation, 2009.

8. HP-263

Tara College of Education Village-Bassa Waziran, Post Office – Bhugnara, Tehsil- Nurpur ,District- kangra Himachal Pradesh.

B.Ed. The institution’s inspection was conducted on 4.08.2009 on the basis of which Show Cause Notice was issued on 31.08.2009. After consideration of the reply to the Show Cause Notice, Committee decided to get fresh inspection of the Institution done. The visiting team, visited the Institution on 20.04.2010, but the inspection was not got conducted by the management. Again, the matter was considered by the Committee in its 161st meeting held on 9th to 11th January, 2010 and it was decided to send visiting team again. This visiting team visited the Institution on 30.10.2010, but again the management did not get the inspection conducted.Since, the management failed to get the inspection done despite the two attempts by NRC’s Visiting Teams, a Show Cause Notice be issued under Section 17 of the NCTE Act for a reply within 30 days.

9. HP-228

Chamba Millennium B.Ed. College, Saraswati Nagar, Mugla Hardsapura, Chamba, H.P, New Champus at Village,Labkana,P.O.Saru, Dist. Chamba H.P.

B.Ed. The Institution’s request to shift to its new premises at Village Lobkan, P.O. Sera Chamba has been considered in the light of Visiting Team Report and CD taken on the occasion of the inspection. Following observations are made:1. The land in the new premises is in the name of Society. It is

acceptable in case of new application, but in this case, since the Institution ‘Chamba Millennium B.Ed. College is in existence since, 2007, the new building/land should have been in the name of the institution and not in the name of the society.

2. The furniture of the institution in its class room is school furniture meant for smaller childrens and is therefore not suited for B.Ed. students.

Show Cause Notice be issued to the institution Under Section 17 of the NCTE Act for a reply within 30 days as to why their request for shifting may not be refused and recognition withdrawn in view of the violation of Clause 8(7) (iv) of the NCTE Regulation, 2009.

10. NRCAPP-28

Shri Gulab Singh Mahavidyalaya, Plot No. – 112, 113, 114, 120, 121, 19, Vill - Barmu Pur, Distt. - Auraiya- 206122, U.P.

D.Ed. The Visiting Team Report and CD taken on that occasion was carefully considered and following observations were made:1. The College Campus is still under construction and all the buildings

are not complete. The inspection was got conducted in a portion of the building, which is complete but is not meant for the B.Ed. Course.

2. The Institution has not developed its infrastructure to be able to run the course due to the following:a. The labs are not at all developed. In the Science and Maths

Resource Centre equipment/apparatus/models were displayed on removable table with no fixed structure Experimental tabls, water/drainage arrangement etc.

b. The inspection team shows separate Physics, Chemistry and Biology Lab, which are obviously not meant for a teachers training college, but the labs are of an Intermediate College, or of B.Sc. classes.


11. HR-1767

RAWAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION,

B.Ed. The Visiting Team Report and the CD taken on the occasion has been carefully considered. The reply of the institution regarding appointment of staff has also been seen and following observations

13


SOHANA ROAD NEAR VILLAGE ZAKOPUR, TEHSIL-BALLABHGARH, FARIDABADH, HARYANA.

made:1. The Multipurpose hall of the institution has been furnished in

form of an auditorium/Committee Room, which is not appropriate to the requirement of a teacher training course.

2. The Faculty appointed by the institution has not been approved by the affiliating university.

3. The institution did not submit a copy of the advertisement issued for appointment of Faculty, a list of candidates who appeared for interview duly signed by each candidate.

4. A copy of the experience Certificate of the Principal for teaching in a Teacher Training College has not been submitted.

The institution be asked for its clarification within 30 days.12. RJ-476 ARYA SHIKSHAK

PRASHIKSHAN MAHILA College, SHAKTI VIHAR, KOTPUTLI, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

B.ED. After perusal of the Visiting Team Report dated 23.11.2010, and CD taken on the occasion following observations were made.

The Institution land is not in the name of the Intuition. Since it is a case of new institution but of shifting of the premises of the institution, the land should have been in the name of the Institution, as per provision under clause 8(7) (IV) of the NCTE Regulation 2009. Show Cause Notice be issued on this ground for a reply within 30 days.

13. RJ-404 BHARTIYA VIDYA MANDIR MAHILA TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, RAM NAGAR, PALI, RAJASTHAN(SHIFTING OF PREMISES)

B.Ed. The Visiting Team Report alongwith CD taken on the occasion of inspection was carefully considered and following observations were made:1. The institution has not developed its infrastructure and

instructional facilities in its new premises due to following reasons:a. No labs have been developed. In the Science and Maths

Resource Centre there was no racks/storage capacity for equipment/apparatuses. They were displayed at the time of inspection and no permanent/fixed structure whatsoever has been developed with experimental tables and associated water/drainage system.

b. The Psychology lab is similarly not developed. There was a temporary display at the time of inspection with no proper lab having racks/almirah for storing the test/equipment.

c. Language lab as a part of the ICT resource Centre has not been developed as per recommendation of NCTE contained in the manual for the Teacher Education Institutions on Organising Teaching Learning Resources in Teacher Education Institutions.

d. The Educational Technology and Computer lab has not been developed at all. The computers are not kept on proper computer tables and the computer chairs have not been provided. Small plastic stools provided with computer tables are totally unsuitable and make the computers totally non-functional.

2. The library of the institution has not been developed properly. There is no seating arrangement in the library with proper tables and chairs. The temporary arrangement made for sitting during the inspection was not part of the library.

3. The land of the institution is in the name of Managing Committee Bhartiya Vidya Mandir, since the institution is an old institution and it is a case of shifting to new premises, the land ought to be in the name of the institution. The continnance of the Land in the name of the Managing Committee is in violation Of NCTE Regulation.

4. The institution has submitted a staff profile of one Principal plus 8 Lecturers out of which only 2 teachers namely Shri Govind

14


Prasad and Shri Jagveer Singh were appointed in the year 2006 & 2007 respectively. The list includes 3 lecturers appointed in July, October & November, 2010. This indicates that this institution has been conducting the courses without appointment of full faculty as per NCTE Norms. Moreover, the approval of the University has not been obtained for appointment of any of the faculty members. The appointment has also not been made by a duly constituted selection committee, having Expert/Nominee of the Imty.

Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 17 of NTCE Act 1993 be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

14. NRCAPP-170

Bajaj College of Management & Technology, 348 kha, Village Bhainsiya Chini Mill Road Gadarpur Udham Singh Nagar- 263152, Uttarakhand.

B.Ed. The visiting team report alongwith the CD taken on the occasion was carefully perused following observations were made:1. The Multipurpose hall of the building has an area of 1523.13 Sq.

Meter, as against the requirement of 2000 Sq. Feet as per NCTE Norms.

2. The Institution is not having any other course in the building, as per details given in the application. However the name of the Institution continues to be ‘Bajaj College of Management and Technology’, which indicates that the institution is either running a course in this building or he has applied for a course in Management or technology in his building.

Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 14(3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

15. NRCAPP-236

L.B.S.S. College of Education, 291/IM. Plot No. 00317-291/IM Village Mahuwa Dabra, Tehsil –Jaspur-244712, District – Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand.

B.Ed. The VT report along with the CD taken on the occasion has been carefully considered and it was decided to issue letter of intent prior to recognition under clause 7(9) of the NCTE, Regulation.

16. RJ- 483

SHRI KALYAN MAHILA SHIKSHAK PRASHIKSHAN MAHAVIDYALAYA, House No. 136/4, Civil Lines, TONK, RAJASTHAN (Shifting of Premises)

B.Ed. The Visiting Team Report along CD taken on the occasion was carefully considered and following observations were made:1. The Class Room furniture is not appropriate in one class room. It

comprised of long tables and long benches without back support, which is not appropriate for grown up students of B.Ed. Course. In other two class rooms, the furniture comprised of small tables and chairs meant for school children and were not found to be appropriate for the students of a B. Ed. Course.

2. The Multipurpose hall of the institution has no raised platform dais, public address system. Moreover, the area of the hall is only 1566 Sq. Feet which is less than the required area of 2000 Square feet.

3. The staff list provided by the institution indicates that Shri Shankar Lal Gupta appointed as Principal is of 64 years of age and did not work as a Principal or Head of the Department in a Teacher Training Institution prior to his appointment in this college and as such was is not eligible to be appointed as Principal. Moreover, the list of faculty indicates that three of the lecturers were appointed in the year 2010. This indicates that the institution has been running the course without proper faculty in violation of the NCTE Norms. Moreover, the approval of the affiliating University for the staff appointment in 2010 has not been submitted by the Institution.

4. The land documents submitted for new premises of the Institution indicate the land is located at Lahan Parhi Road Tonk, whereas, the inspection has been carried out at Bambore Road

15


near Bus Station Tonk. It is not understood whether the land is same where the building has been constructed. Moreover the land is in name of the Society. Since, it is a shifting case, the continuation of the land in the name of the society is violation of Clause 7 (8) (iv) of the NCTE Regulation, 2009.

Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 17 of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

17. NRCAPP397

Hardev Singh Smarak College, 214-A, 214-B/5 Raipur Madiya Jaspur Udham Singh Nagar-244712, Uttrakhand.

B.Ed. After perusal of the Inspection Team Report and CD taken on the occasion ‘following observation were made:-1. The institution has a total built up area of 1522 Sq. Meter.

It has created residential facilities in shape of well furnished guest rooms in the same building meant for the B. Ed. Course. This cannot be allowed as it does not match with the ambience of a college. This also reduces the available space to the institution for instructional purpose. The total built up area is much less than what is required under NCTE Norms.

2. The institution not developed its I.C.T. Resource Centre properly, with the required software as per recommendation of NCTE as contained in its Manual on Organising Teaching Learning Resources in Teacher Education Institutions. The language lab needs to have a comman console and properly connected individual stations. Therefore mear provision of head phones does not make it a language lab.

3. The computer lab has not been properly developed. The computer tables have been provided but the matching computer chair has not been provided. The plastic chairs, provided with the computer tables are not suitable.

Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 14(3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution; time of 30 days be given for reply.

18. RJ-774 BALA SATIJI MAHILA SHIKSHAK PRASHIKSHAN MAHAVIDYALYA, HATUNDI, AJMER, RAJASTHAN(Shifting Case)

B.Ed. The Visiting Team Report dated 26.11.2010 was carefully considered and following observations made:1. The institution is yet to develop its campus with proper roads,

playgrounds.2. The Multipurpose hall of the institution is not properly

developed, it has no dais or raised platform. The furniture comprising of plastic lawn chairs is not appropriate.

The institution be asked to submit a report with documentary evidence, photographs of present status of campus and multipurpose hall before permission is finally granted to shift to the new campus.

19. RJ- 451

MEERA KESHAV MAHILA TEACHER PRASHIKSHAN MAHAVIDYALYA, SHYAMPURA PLACE, 200 JASWANT NAGAR, KHATIPURA, JAPUR-302012, RAJASTHAN(Shifting of Premises)

B.Ed. The visiting team report along with the CD taken at the time of inspection was carefully considered and following observations were made:1. The institution has not properly developed its physical

infrastructure in its classroom, labs etc. due to following:a. The class room furniture is not appropriate. Iron tables and

stool are without any back support and are not even matching with each other in size are not suited as a class room furniture.

b. The institution has not developed its science and maths resource centre. No fixed structure with experimental table has been developed. The lab is not having proper storage arrangement for equipment /apparatus /models and

16


consumables.c. The library has not developed proper seating arrangement.

The temporary tables with plastic lawn chairs kept for the purpose of inspection were not proper.

2. The institution has not furnished a copy of the experience certificate of the Principal appointed in 2009 to show that he has required experience as per NCTE Norms to be appointed as Principal

3. The date of appointment of each teacher faculty has not been indicated.

4. The institution has not submitted approval of the University for the faculty appointed.

5. Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 17 of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

20. UP-3162

ST. R.C. COLLEGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, KHASRA NO.-1351, SHAMLI ROAD, VILL.-BANAT, TEHSIL-SHAMLI, DISTT.-MUZAFFAR NAGAR, UP

B.Ed. The CD taken at the time of inspection was not operative. The institution be asked to submit another copy of the CD.

21. NRCAPP-435

Shree Chand Sharma Memorial Mahavidyalaya, Vill:- Manpur Kalan, Post :- Madanpur, Tehsil :- Khair, Aligarh, UP.

D.El.Ed.

The CD taken at the time of inspection was not operative. The institution be asked to submit another copy of the CD.

22. NRCAPP30

Shri Guru Nanak Degree College, Village Fazalpur Mehrola, Post – Rudrapur, Tehsil – Kichha, District - Udham Singh Nagar- 263153, Uttrakhand.

B.Ed. The VT Report and CD taken on the occasion were carefully considered and following observations made:-1. A photocopier and computer with internet facility is not there in

the library.2. Proper furnishing of the multipurpose hall with adequate

furniture, a dais, raised platform and public address system has not been done.

Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 14(3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution; time of 30 days be given for reply.

23. UP-3183

M.B.M Girls Institute Of Education, Ratanpur Extension, Ratanpur Panki, Distt.-Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh.

B.ED The visiting team report alongwith the CD taken on the occasion was considered and it was decided to issue letter of intent prior to recognition under clause 7(9) of the NCTE Regulation, 2009.

24. NRCAPP13

Sunrise Academy Management Society, Khasra No. – 298, (min) 299 (min), Plot No. - opp DEAL, Street –Raipur Rd, Village - Dehradun, District –Dehradun - 248001, Uttarakhand.

B.Ed. The visiting team report alongwith the CD taken on the occasion was carefully considered and following observations made:1. The size of the Multipurpose hall is 1802 Sq. Feet which is less

than the required size of 2000 Sq. Feet as per NCTE Norms. The CD did not show the Multipurpose hall and its furnishing.

Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 17 of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

25. NRCAPP161

Mahmudabad College of Management and Technology, Plot No. 705, Railway Station

B.Ed. The visiting team report alongwith the CD taken on the occasion was considered and it was decided to issue letter of intent prior to recognition under clause 7(9) of the NCTE Regulation.

17


Road Byepass, VPO- Mahmoodabad, Tehsil- Mahmoodabad, District- Sitapur- 261203, U.P.

26. UP-2751

Maharana Pratap Mahavidyalaya, Jungle Dhushan, Gorakhpur-273014, U.P.

B.Ed. The visiting team report along with the CD taken on the occasion was considered and following observations made:1. The institution has not properly developed its I.C.T. Resource

Centre and ET labs including facility of Language lab. The labs lack proper furniture, the small size plastic stools kept with computer table is thoroughly inadequate and make the facility non-functional.

2. The size of the multipurpose hall is only 1506.28 Sq. Feet, as against the required size of 2000 Sq. Feet, as per NCTE Norms. The hall is also not properly furnished with a raised platform, dais and public address system. The plastic furniture in the hall is also not appropriate.

3. The Science and Maths Resource Centre is not properly developed. It has no washbasin with water and drainage arrangement. There is no storage capacity to keep equipment/apparatus and consumables.

Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 14 (3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

27. NRCAPP251

Shri Jwala Prasad Sharma Shikshan, VPO- Kaurai, Tehsil- Kerawali, Fatehpur Sikri, District- Agra-283110, UP

D.El.Ed.

The visiting team report along with the CD taken on the time of inspection was considered and following observations made:a. The building of the institution is not yet ready to conduct the

D.El.Ed. Course. The building has been plastered, but floors and paintings have not yet been done. Certain rooms like multipurpose hall are not yet to be provided with electrical fittings.

1. Outer campus of the institution is not at all developed. Some portions of the building is still under construction.

2. The size of the class room is only 306 Sq. Feet, which is much less than the prescribed size of 500 Sq. Feet as per NCTE Norms.

3. The Science and Maths Lab has not been developed. The experimental, platform constructed in the lab is not appropriate for lab purposes. It should be properly made with proper stone or tiles. Moreover, there is no sink with associated water arrangement and drainage. The number of equipment is not enough and there is no space for storage of equipment /apparatus/ consumables.

4. The Psychology lab is not developed, it has no storage capacity to keep the equipment/apparatus/consumables.

5. The Multipurpose hall is not properly furnished, the plastic lawn chairs are not appropriate. There is no raised platform, dais and public address system.

6. The ICT Resource Centre with IT Lab and Language lab has not at all been developed. The computers provided in the labs are not on proper computer tables with matching chairs. The plastic chairs provided in the computer room makes the lab non functional.


28. UP-3053

Shri Balaji Maharaj Mahavidyalaya, Naglaa Garhi, Sasni, Hathras, U.P.

B.Ed. The VT report alongwith the CD taken on the occasion was carefully considered and following observations were made:1. The institution is not yet ready to take up the B.Ed. Course in

terms of physical infrastructure which is still not complete. At several rooms doors have not been provided. At many other places, there are no doors on the windows.

18


2. Science and Maths Resource Centre has not been developed. There are no fixed structure with experimental tables and associated water and drainage arrangement in the centre. Some equipment/apparatus were displayed on removable table covered with bed sheets at the time of inspection. There is no storage arrangement in the lab for keeping equipments/apparatus and consumables.

3. The I.C.T. Resource Centre with ET Lab, Computer Lab and Language Lab has not been developed. As clearly seen in the CD, the computers were kept on wooden platforms created for the purpose, but there were no matching computer chairs. The class rooms chairs (with side notes taking fixed wooden handle) were kept in the computer room, making the computers totally non functional. The ICT Resource Centre has not been developed as per recommendation of NCTE as contained in its manual for the teacher education institution and teacher educators.

4. The Library has no seating arrangement. The arrangement made at the time of inspection by some tables and class room chair show that it was temporary arrangement for inspection purpose only.

5. The total ambience of the building is very poor and is not upto the mark for a B.Ed. College.


29. UP-3344

Prithvi Shiv Kishan Majdoor Balika P.G. College, Akhanpura and Katahura, VPO- Rasra, Tehsil- Rasra, District- Ballia, Uttar Pradesh

B.Ed. The VT report along with CD taken on the occasion was considered and following observations made:1. The class room furniture comprising of long tables, matched with

long benches without back support is not appropriate for a B.Ed. College. The institution does not have proper class room furniture.

2. The library has no seating arrangement. The temporary arrangement; made at time of inspection in terms of table with bed sheet spread on it is not acceptable as proper arrangement for a library. Library is not having photocopier and computer with internet facility

3. The Science and Math Resource Centre has not been properly developed as per recommendation of NCTE as contained in its Manual on Organising Teaching Learning Resources in Teacher Education Institutions. The side platform has been provided but there are no sinks, water arrangement and drainage arrangement. Lab is not having adequate furniture and proper storage arrangement to store equipment/apparatus/consumables.

4. The ICT Resource Centre has not been developed, as per recommendations of NCTE as contained in its above mentioned Manual. The computers have been kept on wooden platform created for the purpose but matching computer chairs have not been provided. The plastic lawn chairs provided with the computers makes them totally non functional.

5. The Psychology Lab has not been properly developed. The Psychological tests were displayed on removable tables at the time of inspection. However, tests and equipment for Psychology Lab are not sufficient. There is no storage facility in the so called lab to keep the test/apparatus etc.

6. The Multipurpose hall is not properly developed. It has no dais, raised platform and public address system. The Plastic chairs provided in the hall are not appropriate.


30. DH- VIVEKANANDA B.EL.E The visiting team reports for the inspection conducted in May

19


410 COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI, VIVEK VIHAR, DELHI-110095,

D. 2010 and Dec 2010 have been considered alongwith the CD taken at the time of 2nd inspection and following observations were made:- The Institution has not developed the specific infrastructural facilities needed for the students of four year B. Ed. Course, in terms of it’s various laboratories, and workshop as specified in the Norms of the NCTE for the said course, which is evident from the following observations:-

a. The Institution has not developed it’s Curriculum laboratory at all, as per specifications in the NCTE Norms. A class room was used to display the equipment and material procured for being used in the lab, but the lab as such has not been developed. No work table for hands on experience has been procured. The class room long tables with attached benches were kept in the laboratory, which is not at all suite to work for hand on experience or for group experience. This is not even removable as per requirement for such a lab. The institution has not even provided storage capacity/facility in the lab to keep all these materials that were displayed at the time inspection. The institution simply used a class room, placed its furniture on one side and displayed several items at the time of inspection. Pasting the lab’s name on the entry gate on a piece of paper cannot be treated as development of a Laboratry. So called Curriculum labs was therefore, only an arranged display of material and not a properly developed lab, as recommended for a 4 year B.El Ed. Course.

b. The Resource laboratory has as not been developed. Here again certain books not related to curriculum, materials, children literature and irrelevant books not related to the subject like “Emerging Indian Society”, ’Law Profiles, ’O.P.Jindal Global University (pamphlet)etc. were displayed. The Institution did not take the NCTE Norns in it’s right earnest to at least develop some reasonable facility in form of curriculum material and children literature.There was no material for being used by Student teachers in schools .The resource lab has no computer facility , which is essential and has been specifically mentioned in the NCTE Norms for the course. The class room temporally used for inspection purposes had no provision for the Recourse lab. It did not have sufficient space for students meeting and group discussion, as provided in the NCTE Norms.

c. The NCTE Norms also require physical infrastructure in form of two workshop space, specifically for the course; one for specific practicum activities and other for physical education. Whereas the institution has proposed it existing sports room, with its Gym as workshop space it has not provided any space for other activities.The institution is not having a Multipurpose Hall, which could meet this requirment. Again the college Auditorium’ however impressive it may be, does not meet the requirement of

20


B.El.Ed. Course, to organize its various activities. The auditorium has fixed furniture and fixtures, leaving little scope for the students of the, B.El.Ed. Course to organize ther curricular and co curricular activities.

d. The institute has not taken any action to even develop a proper departmental library for the course, as recommended by NCTE in its Norms. The existing library of the institution has all the facilities but it does not have enough books for the proposed course. Two racks earmarked for the B.El. Ed. books are not having more than 300 books, and they all seems to be old books, already available in the library. The library facilities are apparently not adequate and the institution has not subscribed education journal in its library.

2. A visiting team conducted inspection of the istitution earlier on 18th may, 2010. The Visiting Team categorically mentioned that the intuition has not developed required facility essential for the course and proposes to use the existing facilities of the College. A perusal of the CD taken at the time of second inspection in December, 2010, confirmed that the institution did not take any action even thereafter to create physical infrastructure, for the course, as per NCTE Norms.

In view of the above, the NRC came to the conclusion that the institute has not developed the required physical facilities/ infrastructure essential for the Course, even when the common facilities available in the College are utilized. Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 14 (3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply.

AGENDA ITEM:-180.05.

CONSIDERATION OF VTR UNDER SECTION 15 OF NCTE ACT 1993

Sr. No.

File Code No.


Decision of NRC

1. RJ-1776 M.ED. ADD. INTAKE,

BANASTHALI UNIVERSITY, BANASTHALI VIDYAPEETH, NEWAI, TONK- 304022, RAJATHAN

M.ED. ADD. INTAKE

The visiting team report along with the CD were carefully considered and following observation made:-

(a) The institution is also running a school in the same campus where B. Ed., M.Ed. courses are being conducted and M.Ed. Additional Course is proposed. The institution has not clearly demarcated separate space for the teacher education courses and the school.

(b) The existing faculty of the institution does not adequately adumbrate the capability for handling various core and elective component for B.Ed. programme / curriculum.

(c) The existing faculty of the institution is also short of

21


the requirement as per NCTE Norms.(d) The institution lacks proper furniture in its class

room and Lab. The plastic chair kept in class room, labs etc is not appropriate.

(e) The institution is running a B.Ed. Course and M. Ed. Course. The two courses are quite old since 1962 and 1965 respectively. The Institute have not got the NAAC Accreditation for additional intake in its M.Ed. Course. Since as per NCTE Norms any institution applying for a M.Ed. Course needed to have a NAAC Accreditation, the same norm would apply for additional Intake as well.

(f) The computer rooms are not having proper computer tables with matching chairs. The plastic chairs provided with the computer tables are not very convenient to proper functioning of the computers


2. NRCAPP334

Akal College of Education, Plot No- 219, VPO- Mastuana Sahib, Tehsil- Sangrur, District- Sangrur- 148001, Punjab

M.ED The visiting team report, CD taken at the time of Inspection and other documents has been careful considered and following observation made.

a. The NCTE Regulation required that an institution can be permitted to apply for an M. Ed. Course only if it has taken NACC Accreditation for the existing B. Ed. Course with B+ Grade. The Institution be asked to clarify its position in this regard.

3. UP-3118

Subharti Institute of Management & Information Technology, plot no. 1628 & 1629, Vill- Maliyana, Meerut

M.Ed The visiting team report, CD taken at the time of Inspection and all other related documents have been considered and following observations were made:-

(1) The Institution is having M. Ed., B.P.Ed. and B.Ed. (Additional Intake) course, recognised in the name of Subharti College of Management & Information Technology Meerut. It is understood that the institution name has been changed to Subharti University. It is not understand whether course approved in the name of college in the past has since been changed in the name of Subharti University. The status in the regard may be obtained, alongwith a copy of the University Act and Statute to show whether he Subharti College of Management & Information Technology Meerut is maintaining its separate entity or is the part of the university. It needs to be clarified with relevant documents.

2. NCTE Regulation required NAAC Accreditation for existing recognised B. Ed. Colleges, for additional intake or for M.Ed. Course. The Institute may clarify whether it has since taken the Accreditation and if so, a copy of the Accreditation Certificate may be submitted.

22


3. The institute is also required to submit a detailed list of the existing faculty for its entire teacher training courses.Hence Show Cause Notice be issued under section clause 15 (3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993, for a reply within 30 days.

4. HR-1591

Gaur Brahman College of Education, Gau Karana Road, VPO- Rohtak, District-Rohtak, Haryana

B.ED. Add.

The visiting team report dated 22-01-2011 and the CD taken on this occasion has been carefully considered with a view to see whether the deficiencies pointed out by earlier visiting team, vide inspection held on 31-07-09 has been made up. Following observations in this regard are made:-

1. The infrastructure earmarked for the B.Ed. course and for the additional intake continued to be in adequate. The size of the multipurpose hall is only 1200 Sq feet, as against the requirement of 2000 Sq. feet. For the Lab, the team was shown another place where equipments were required to be shifted which shows that the Labs, particularly the science and Mathematics Education Resource Center has not been developed for the additional requirement. This is clear from the observation of the CD.

2. The Library of the institution continues to be deficient and VT recommended its replenishment.

3. The institution had shown a separate building to meet the requirement of additional intake, which cannot be accepted as the existing building housing the B.Ed. course should be able to meet the higher requirement of additional intake, instead of a separate building.

Hence, NRC decided that Show Cause Notice on the above grounds under section 15 (3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993 be issued to the institution, time of 30 days be given for reply

5. HR-1765

GANPATI INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, VILL- KAROLi, POST- BASIPUR, TEHSIL- NARNOL, DISTT- MAHINDERGARH, HARYANA.

M.ED. The 159th meeting of NRC decided to defer the matter regarding consideration of V.T. Report for the M.Ed. course, pending finalization of show cause notice to the institution for B.Ed. course under section 17 of NCTE Act. Since the matter regarding B.Ed. course has since been finalized the VT report of the institution dated 14-02-2010 was considered along with the CD taken on the occasion. The inspection team report was positive and in consonance with the CD.

NRC decided to issue letter of intent prior to recognition under clause 7(9) of the NCTE Regulation 2009.

23


AGENDA ITEM:-180.06.CONSIDERATION THE REPLY FROM 7(9) TO 7(11)

Sr. No.

File Code No.

Name of the Institution

Name of the Course

Decision of NRC

1. HR-1709

Shri Ram College of Education, Village-Urjani, Post Office-Jagadhari, Chachrouli, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana

B.Ed. Deferred, RD may ask the clarification of the institution on the point raised in the agenda note and resubmit.

2. UP-3380

Markandey Mahavidhyalaya, Village – Tarapur, Post Office – Sadalpura, Tehsil – Sakaldiha, District – Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh

B.Ed. The reply of the institution dated 16.09.2010 and the original file was considered and the NRC decided that the recognition for B.Ed. course under clause 7 (11) of NCTE, Regulations, 2009 and section 14 (3) (a) of NCTE, Act, 1993 from the session 2010-2011 with an annual intake of 100 seats be given in view of the letter of approval of faculty appointment by University, submitted by the institution, subject to the following conditions:- The admission of the students shall be made only after

affiliation by the examining body before the commencement of the academic session and the admission of students shall be completed well before the cut -off date prescribed by the examining body for the academic session 2011-2012 failing which the recognition will be effective from the next academic session.

3. UP-2140

Prabha Devi Mahavidyalaya, Mukhalispur Road, Khalilabad, District- Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh

M.Ed. Time allowed for recruitment of faculty for the M.Ed. course for a further period of 3 months.

4. UP-2269

Unity Degree College, Post – Barawan Kalan, Kakori, District – Lucknow (U.P.)

M.Ed. 1. The reply of the institution dated 26.11.2010 has been considered while the designation of Sri Subhash Mishra was inadvertently mentioned as Professor, his appointment as Associate Professor has been made in violation to the NCTE Norms. He is not having the required experience of 3 years of teaching at M.Ed. level to qualify for appointment as Associate Professor. NRC decided that the institution be asked to clarify the position and submit his experience certificate.

2. Earlier appointment of Dr. Ram Shankar Mishra as Professor was in accordance with NCTE Regulation, as he is a retired HOD. The appointment ought to be on contract basis for period of one year only.

5. UP-2858

Chandra Bhan Singh Memorial Shikshan Sansthan, Village & Post Office – Jhinjhak, District – Kanpur Dehat – 209002 (U.P.)

B.Ed. The reply of the institution dated 11.01.2011 and the original file was considered and the NRC decided that the recognition for B.Ed. course under clause 7 (11) of NCTE, Regulations, 2009 and section 14 (3) (a) of NCTE, Act, 1993 from the session 2011-2012 with an annual intake of 100 seats be given in view of the letter of approval of faculty appointment by University

24


submitted by the institution subject to the following conditions:- The admission of the students shall be made only after

affiliation by the examining body before the commencement of the academic session and the admission of students shall be completed well before the cut -off date prescribed by the examining body for the academic session 2011-2012 failing which the recognition will be effective from the next academic session.

6. UP-3155

Modern Academy B.Ed. college, Plot No. 375/550, Village – Sikri Kalan, Post Office – Modinagar, Tehsil – Modinagar, District – Ghaziabad – 201204 (U.P.)

B.Ed. Reply dated 10.01.2011 has carefully considered and it was decided to constituted a VT

7. UP-2570

Modern College of Professional studies, 431, Anand Industrial Area, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar pradesh

M.Ed. The reply dated 13.01.2011 of the institution was considered and the appointment of Dr. Shankar Lal Gupta as Professor has been found in order. Approval of the University for his appointment vide letter dated 23.03.2010 has been noted 2. Earlier this institution conveyed approval of the University dated

21.06.2008 for affidavit of lecturers. In view of subsequent changes in the appointment conveyed vide institution letter dated 05.12.2008, the institution needs to obtain approval of the University for these appointments as well.

3. Appointment of Dr. Abha Mathur as Reader is not in order as she does not posses experience of teaching at P.G. level

The institution be asked to clarify its position on above point (2) & (3) above, within 30 days.

8. PB-518

C.T. College of Education, Greater Kailash, Maqsudan Chowk, District – Jalandhar – 144008 (Punjab)

B.Ed. (Additional)

The reply of the institution dated 19.01.2011 and 24.11.2011 has been considered and following observation made :-

1. The institution has not furnished the list of Faculty for the Additional B.Ed. intake alongwith the existing faculty for the existing basic unit of B.Ed. (100 seats).

2. The University nominee has not been associated with the selection process. The university was not requested for nomination of expert in the selection committee.

3. List of candidates, who appeared in the interview dualy signed by each candidate has not been submitted.

4. University approval to the appointment of faculty has not been obtained.


9. UP-3277

S.P. COLLEGE, KHASRA NO.-214, 217, 207, VILL.-TIGRI, POST-RONIA, TEHSIL-CHANDPUR, DISTT.-BINJOR, UP

B.P.Ed. Formal Recognition order under Clause 7(11) of the NCTE Regulation, 2007 be issued for B.P.Ed. Course with intake of 50 seats.

10. UP-1520

Aryan Institute of Management & Computer Studies, Sector-13, Avas Vikas Colony, Sikandra Bodla Road, Agra- 282007,

B.T.C. Approval of the Controller of Examination, Allahabad for appointment of the faculty be awaited.

25


Uttar Pradesh11. HP-

256Gurukul Bharti College of Education, Vill-Benla Brahmna, P.O Chandpur, Distt Bilaspur(HP)

B.Ed. The reply dated 15.02.2011 of the Institution in response to NRC, letter dated 16.12.2010 has been considered. NRC decided to issue formal recognition order under clause 7(11) of the NCTE Regulation, 2007 with usual condition.

12. UP-1470

Vivekanand College of Education, Gonda Road, Near Mathura Bye Pass, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh.

B.T.C. The reply of the Institution has been considered with following observations:1. Smt. Sarita Yagnik, appointment as Principal is not having 5

years experience of teaching in Elementary Teacher Training Institution.

2. The Institution has not obtained the approval of the controller of Examination, Allahabad, for the appointment of the Faculty.

NRC decided that the institution be asked to clarify its position,within 30 days.

13. UP-2808

Vansha Devi Degree College, Village- Gazadharpur, Post- Gaddopur, Tehsil- Badlapur, District- Jaunpur- 222002, Uttar Pradesh.

B.Ed. Reply of the Institution dated 21.02.2011 has been considered and following observations made:a. Approval of the University has not been obtained for the

appointment of Shri Akhilesh Kumar as Principal of the college.

b. A list of the candidates who appeared in the interview for the post of Lecturer, duly signed by each cndidate has not been submitted.

Letter be asked to clarify its position further.14. HP-

260Shanti College of Education, Plot No. 1934, Village – Kailash Nagar, Post Office – Nakroh, Tehsil – Amb, District – Daulatpur, Himachal Pradesh

M.Ed. The reply of the Institution dated 23.02.2011 with respect to NRC’s letter dated 25.01.2011 has been considered and following observations made:

1. Experience Certificate in respect of Sri Chandra Kant Sharma’s appointment as Associate Professor has not been submitted to establish that he possesed teaching experience of 3 years at M.Ed. Level. As such his appointment is not as per NCTE Norms.

NRC decided that the institution be asked to clarify its position on the above point, with in 30 days.

16. UP-3001

SMT. GENDA DEVI MAHAVIDYALAYA, ALLIPUR BARWARA, POST. SIRAWALI, KASGANJ, ETAH- UP

M.Ed. The approval of the university for the faculty appointed for M.ED course be awaited.

17. UP-2829

Basant Ram Nageena Mahavidyalaya, Vpo- Dharaon, Chandauli, U.P

B.Ed. Formal Recognition order under clause 7(11) of the NCTE Regulation, 2009 be issued. The fixed deposit receipt towards Endowment Fund and Reserve Fund be returned to the Institution for converting them into Joint Account.

18. UP-1654

Bal Mukund Bazari College Of Education, Near Runkata Railway Station, Post - Artoni, Agra, U.P.

B.T.C. Formal Recognition order under Clause 7(11) of the NCTE Regulation, 2007 be issued for B.T.C. Course.

19. UP-3037

TARA CHAND VEDIC PUTREE DEGREE COLLEGE, PATEL NAGAR, NEW MANDI, DISTT.-MUZAFFAR NAGAR, UP

B.Ed. The reply of the Institution dated 1.3.2011 has been considered. Institution be asked to submit following details about the Faculty appointed by them:1. Statement giving full details about qualification, of each

Faculty/HOD, with Division and percentage of marks and experience certificate. An affidavit on Non-Judicial Stamp of Rs. 100, in the prescribed form be submitted.

2. A photocopy of the advertisement issued by the Institution for

26


recruitment of Faculty.3. Letter of the University nominating experts in the selection

committee. 4. Minutes of the Selection Committee.5. List of Candidate who appeared for interview duly signed by

each candidate who appeared for interview.NRC decided that institution be asked to furnish the above details within 30 days.

20. UP-2873

Mirza Ahsandhulla Beg Niswan (Girls) Degree College, Anjan Shahid, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh

B.Ed. The reply of the Institution in response to Appelate Authrity,s order dated 25.01.2011 has been considered. NRC decided to issue formal recognition order under clause 7(11) of the NCTE Regulation, 2007 with usual conditions.

21. UP-1874

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Awadh University, Faizabad, U.P.

M.Ed. Formal Recognition order under clause 7(11) be issued in continuation to the LoI dated 8.09.2006 and in suppersession to the Refusal order dated 9.07.2008, set aside by the Appellate Authority.

22. UP-3373

Ram Nagina Kisan P.G. College, Vill- Muriyari (Todarpur), Post- Jakhanian (Khetabpur), Tehsil- Jakhanian, District- Ghazipur-275203, Uttar Pradesh

B.P.Ed. Formal Recognition order under Clause 7(11) of the NCTE Regulation, 2007 be issued for B.P.Ed. Course with intake capacity of 50 students.

23. UP-3104

Heritage International Business School, Vill- Tala Nagari, Post- Aligarh, Tehsil- Koil, District- Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh.

B.Ed. The reply of the institution dated 26.02.2011 has been considered. The appointment of Smt. Suman Bala as Principal is not as per NCTE Norms as she is above 62 years of age and did not work as professor or HOD in a B.ED College to be illegible for appointment as Principle on contract basis, for a period not exceeding one year in the first instance. The institution be asked to clarify the position with in 30 days.


CONSIDERATION OF REPLY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE U/S 14/15(3) (B) OF NCTE ACT, 1993

Sr. No.

File Code No.


Name of the Course

Decision of NRC

1. UP-3537

College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Plot No. 286 A& B, Delhi Road, NH-24, Vill- Bagarpur, Post-

B.Ed. The Reply of the institution dated 22.08.2010 in response to the Show Cause Notice has been carefully considered and following observation are made:-(i) The contention of the application in their reply that the land, which is at present in the name of the sponsoring body i.e. Teerthankar Mahaveer institute of Management & Technology Society will be transferred in the name of the institution i.e. College of Education Teerthankar Mahaveer

27


Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P.

Univerisity within six months of recognition cannot be accepted, as the applicant of the B.Ed. Course is Teerthankar Mahaveer University, Moradabad and nowhere the name of the Society in the application form appeared as the applicant Society. Since the applicant in the case is the Teerthankar Mahaveer University, Moradabad, the land should be either in the name of the University or in the name of the proposed institution namely College of Education Teerthankar Mahaveer University, Moradabad. This would be in violation of clause 8 (7) (i) of the NCTE Regulation 2009.(ii) The institution in its said reply has claimed that it is an ‘in-Campus’ College and hence can share the facilities of the University for playground etc. This claim cannot be accepted on the face value on the basis of the land documents submitted. The university should have submitted the total master plan of the University and location of this College in the total Campus to substantiate its claim. This is essential, as even the Appellate Authority has not accepted the claim of the University that it can establish ‘off campus’ Colleges vide its decision dated 08.01.2009. As such, it needs to be established beyond doubt that it is an ‘in-campus’ College.(iii) The Society has got recognised B.Ed. Course (100 Seats) and M.Ed. Course in the name of Teeranthankar Mahavir Institute of Management as Technology at Delhi Road, Moradabad and one B.T.C. Course in the same name at village Bagarpur, Moradabad. It is not understood, whether these three courses & the college has become part of the T. M. University. If so, are they existing as its ‘Campus College’. In that case, this present application cannot be accepted as another “Campus College” for the same purpose / discipline.

Hence, the recognition of the said institution is refused under section 14 (3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993 on the above grounds.

2. UP-3526

Girls College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Khasra no. 100, Sez Road, Vill- Bakainia, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P.

B.Ed. The Teerthanker Mahavir Institute of Management and Technology has replied vide its letter dated 22.08.2010 to the show-cause notice issued by NRC. The College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Khasra no. 100, Sez Road, Vill- Bakainia, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P. is proposed to be established for 100 seats B.Ed. Course for which the Teerathanker Mahavir University, Moradabad is the applicant. Hence, it is not understood as to how suddenly the Teerthanker Mahavir Institute of Management & Technology Society has come into picture, whereas, all along the Teerthanker Mahavir University has been the applicant for this college. It is seen from the application that even when the Teerthanker Mahavir University has been the applicant society, the land where the proposed college building has been constructed is not in the name of Teerthanker Mahavir University. The society also did not transfer the available land with the society in the name of institute (education college in the case) so as to qualify for

28


recognition in terms f clause 8 (7) (i) of the NCTE Regulation 2007, which requires that the land should be either in the name of the applicant sponsoring society (University in the case) or institution (Education college). Since the land is not in the name of either of the two bodies, the institution does not qualify for consideration of recognition.2. The new building plan submitted by the institution is in

the name of the Girl’s College of Education, Tirthanker. Mahavir University. The College is not an ‘in-Campus’ college and as per ‘Appellate Authority order dated 08.01.2009, the University is not authorized to establish the ‘off college campus’ in violation of the UGC (Established & Maintenance of standard in private Universities) Regulation 2003.

3. Language lab facility is not adequate. The institution purchased only one set of required equipments for the language lab and the same photograph of the lab has been submitted as a proof of development of language lab in cases of all the four colleges, which the University applied..

4. The revised building plan submitted later cannot be accepted as it did not indicate, the total area, which has been earmarked for the construction of the college building and forms it’s campus. Apparently, the total available land, as in the document has not been used for the said education college campus, as then enough land would have been available for the play grounds which is not available in the building inspected by the VT, (This is apparent form the CD that apart from the built up area, the college does not have any spare land in the college campus to be used as play ground). As such, full 2500 Sq. Meter of land, required for the college campus as per NCTE Norms, 2009 has not been made available.

5. As per new building plan now submitted the size of the Multipurpose Hall is only 142.46 Sq. Meter, which is much less them 2000 Sq. Ft., as prescribed in the NCTE Norms.

6. The college Library has not been developed properly, despite two inspections and it continued deficit in terms of required number of titles as per NCTE Norms. The photocopies of the list / bills presented now cannot be accepted, at this stage.

7. The Website page submitted by the institution continues to show this College as part of Teerthanker Mahavir University. This situation cannot be accepted in view of the above order of the Appellate Authority that University cannot establish the ‘off-campus’ college in violation to the UGC (Establishment and Maintenance of standard in Private Universities) Regulation 2003.

Hence, the Show-Cause Notice under section 14 (3) (b) of NCTE Act, 1993 be issued to the institution before refusing the recognition on the above grounds.

29


3. UP-3525

College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Khasra no. 101 Min, Sez Road, Vill- Bakainia, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P.

B.Ed. The Teerthanker Mahavir Institute of Management and Technology has replied vide its letter dated 22.08.2010 to the show-cause notice issued by NRC. The College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Khasra no. 101 Min, Sez Road, Vill- Bakainia, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P. is proposed to be established for 100 seats B.Ed. Course for which the Teerathanker Mahavir University, Moradabad is the applicant. Hence, it is not understood as to how suddenly the Teerthanker Mahavir Institute of Management & Technology Society has come into picture, whereas, all along the Teerthanker Mahavir University has been the applicant for this college. It is seen from the application that even when the Teerthanker Mahavir University has been the applicant society, the land where the proposed college building has been constructed is not in the name of Teerthanker Mahavir University. The society also did not transfer the available land with the society in the name of institute (education college in the case) so as to qualify for recognition in terms f clause 8 (7) (i) of the NCTE Regulation 2007, which requires that the land should be either in the name of the applicant sponsoring society (University in the case) or institution (Education college). Since the land is not in the name of either of the two bodies, the institution does not qualify for consideration of recognition.2. The new building plan submitted by the institution is in


3. Language lab facility is not adequate. The institution purchased only one set of required equipments for the language lab and the same photograph of the lab has been submitted as a proof of development of language lab in case of all the four colleges, which the University applied..

4. The revised building plan submitted later cannot be accepted as it did not indicate, the total built up area, which has been earmarked for the construction of the college building and forms it’s campus. Apparently, the total available land, as in the document has not been used for the said education college campus, as then enough land would have been available for the play grounds which is not available in the building inspected by the VT, (This is apparent form the CD that apart from the built up area, the college does not have any spare land in the college campus to be used as play ground). As such, full 2500 Sq. Meter of land, required for the college campus as per NCTE Norms, 2009 has not been made available.

5. As per new building plan now submitted the size of the

30


Multipurpose Hall is only 142.46 Sq. Meter, which is much less them 2000 Sq. Ft., as prescribed in the NCTE Norms.

6. The college Library has not been developed properly, despite two inspections and it continued deficit in terms of required number of titles as per NCTE Norms. The photocopies of the list / bills presented now cannot be accepted, at this stage.



4. UP-3533

College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Plot No. 94 Min., Sez Road, Vill- Bakainia, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P.

B.Ed. The Teerthanker Mahavir Institute of Management and Technology has replied vide its letter dated 22.08.2010 to the show-cause notice issued by NRC. The College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Plot No. 94 Min., Sez Road, Vill- Bakainia, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P. is proposed to be established for 100 seats B.Ed. Course for which the Teerathanker Mahavir University, Moradabad is the applicant. Hence, it is not understood as to how suddenly the Teerthanker Mahavir Institute of Management & Technology Society has come into picture, whereas, all along the Teerthanker Mahavir University has been the applicant for this college. It is seen from the application that even when the Teerthanker Mahavir University has been the applicant society, the land where the proposed college building has been constructed is not in the name of Teerthanker Mahavir University. The society also did not transfer the available land with the society in the name of institute (education college in the case) so as to qualify for recognition in terms f clause 8 (7) ( i) of the NCTE Regulation 2007, which requires that the land should be either in the name of the applicant sponsoring society (University in the case) or institution (Education college). Since the land is not in the name of either of the two bodies, the institution does not qualify for consideration of recognition.2. The new building plan submitted by the institution is in


3. Language lab facility is not adequate. The institution

31


purchased only one set of required equipments for the language lab and the same photograph of the lab has been submitted as a proof of development of language lab in cases of all the four colleges, which the University applied.



6. The college Library has not been developed properly, despite two inspections it continued deficit in terms of required number of titles as per NCTE Norms. The photocopies of the list / bills presented now cannot be accepted, at this stage.



5. UP-3547

College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Plot No. 265 Min., Sez Road, Vill- Hashampur Gopal, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P.

B.Ed. The Teerthanker Mahavir Institute of Management and Technology has replied vide its letter dated 22.08.2010 to the show-cause notice issued by NRC. The College of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Plot No. 265 Min., Sez Road, Vill- Hashampur Gopal, Post- Pakbara, Tehsil- Moradabad, District- Moradabad, U.P. is proposed to be established for 100 seats B.Ed. Course for which the Teerathanker Mahavir University, Moradabad is the applicant. Hence, it is not understood as to how suddenly the Teerthanker Mahavir Institute of Management & Technology Society has come into picture, whereas, all along the Teerthanker Mahavir University has been the applicant for this college. It is seen from the application that even when the Teerthanker Mahavir University has been the applicant society, the land where the proposed college

32


building has been constructed is not in the name of Teerthanker Mahavir University. The society also did not transfer the available land with the society in the name of institute (education college in the case) so as to qualify for recognition in terms f clause 8 (7) (i) of the NCTE Regulation 2007, which requires that the land should be either in the name of the applicant sponsoring society (University in the case) or institution (Education college). Since the land is not in the name of either of the two bodies, the institution does not qualify for consideration of recognition.2. The new building plan submitted by the institution is in


3. Language lab facility is not adequate. The institution purchased only one set of required equipments for the language lab and the same photograph of the lab has been submitted as a proof of development of language lab in cases of all the four colleges, which the University applied.



6. The college Library has not been developed properly, despite two inspections it continued deficit in terms of required number of titles as per NCTE Norms. The photocopies of the list / bills presented now cannot be accepted, at this stage.


33



6. UP-2183

R.N. College, Opp. Pandeshwar Mahadev Mandir,Hastinpur, District-Meerut-U.P.

B.P.Ed. Deferred

7. HP - 270

Sharan College of Education for Women, Vill - Ghurkari, Tehsil & Distt. -Kangra, Himachal Pradesh

M.Ed. The Institution reply dated 18.09.2010 in response to the decision taken in 164th meeting held in August 28-29 has been considered and following observation made:-

1. The institute had not submitted individual affidavits relating to qualification and experience. These documents have now been submitted but it is seen that Principal and Reader appointed earlier eg. Dr. M. A. Siddiqui and Dr. Preohont Rajput, has been replaced by two new appointees namely Dr. Nagartre Kr Jhaand Dr. Rakesh Rai. Earlier these appointments were made by a duly constituted Selection Committee vide its meeting held on 22.11.2008, but no Selection Committee was held for these two new appointment and these appointments have also not been approved by the concerned University authority, as required under NCTE Regulation.

2. The experience certificate submitted in respect of Dr. Nagendera Kumar Jha, from Bansidhar Mahavidalaya, indicates that he taught teaching of Mathematics / Science in the Department of Education. Thus he had no experience of Teaching at M.Ed. level.

3. The experience of Certificate submitted in respect of Dr. Rakesh Rai, appointed as Reader, from SRM University, indicates that he taught in the Education Department of that University Since 24th February, 2007 to till date (Ist July, 2010) but it does not indicates that he had 3 years of experience of teaching at M.Ed. level.

The Institution thus failed to appoint a Principal and a Reader, having required experience of teaching at M.Ed. level NRC decided that the institution be asked to clarify the position with in 30 day.

8. NRCAPP246

M.D.INDRAPRASTHA INSTITUTE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, PLOT NO.41 TO 43, VILL-RAJEEV NAGAR, BEGUMPUR EXT. POST-BEGUMPUR,

D.EL.ED.

The reply of the institution dated 12.08.2010 with reference to the Show Cause Noticed dated 15.07.2010 has been considered. The institution has added some library books to make them a total of 1383 books and has added furniture’s to its Lab. The reply of institution regarding availability of reading capacity in the Library and playground has been considered as satisfactory. Therefore, NRC decided to issue letter of

34


TEHSIL-KANJHWALA, DISTRICT-NORTH WEST DELHI, DELHI

intent prior to recognition under clause 7 (9) of the NCTE Regulations for a D.El. Ed. Course with intake capacity of 50 students, with usual Condition.

9. ` NRCAPP268

Surat Singh College Of Education, 464, VPO-Kishanpur Baral, Tehsil- Baraut, Dist-Baghpat-250623, Uttar Pradesh

D.El.Ed. The reply of the institution dated 15.10.2010 in response to the Show Cause Notice dated 17.09.2010 has been carefully considered alongwith the new CD submitted by the institute as a proof for various improvements made as per their claim in the reply. The institution continues to give a very shabby look and no tangible improvement seems to have been made after the Show Cause Notice. The Science and Maths Resource Centre still has no storage capacity; the experimental tables are covered with plastic sheets. These seem to be no improvement in the facilities by the institution in its labs.

The NRC decided to refuse recognition for a D.El. Ed. Course Under Section 14 (3) (b) of the NCTE Regulation 2009.

10. PB-650

College of Education for Women Raikot, VPO- Jalaldiwal, Raikot- Barnala Sh-13, Tehsil- Raikot, Dist- Ludhiana- 148104, Punjab

M.ED The Point Wise reply of the institution vide there letter dated 22.11.2010 with response to the Show Cause Notice has been considered. The institution failed to establish clearly that Dr. Rakesh Dubey appointed as Professor for M.Ed. Course programme possessed teaching experience of 5 years at M.Ed. level as required under NCTE Regulation. Similarly regarding the two appointments of Reader, the institution failed to establish that either of the two have 3 years experience of teaching at M.Ed. Level. The institutes also failed to produce approval of the University for the Appointment of faculty as required under clause 7 (9) of NCTE Regulation.

As such, NRC decided to refused recognition to the institution for an M.Ed. Course Under Section 15 (3) (b) of the NCTE Regulation 2009.

11. UP-2261

SHIV NATH VERMA SMARAK MAHAVIDYALAYA, DEV NAGAR (KHANPUR PILAI ), SULTANPUR-222101

B.P.Ed. The Institution’s reply dated 03.12.2010 with reference to the points of Show Cause Notice has been carefully considered and the CD submitted by the institution to support its claim that it had made up its deficiencies has been carefully consider. The institution did not give any reply to several questions in the Show Cause Notice. No reply has been given about available built up area being shared by other courses like B.A., B.Com, M. Com. Etc. Floor, toilets continued to be as such, Library is totally unsystemetic. The equipment in Gymnasium continued to be inadequate. Moreover its roof is of asbestos / tin sheet, which is not permissible. All Labs in the institution continue to be till equipped. The Labs are not properly built; equipment / instruments / models continue to be displayed on removable tables even in the new CD. There is no storage in the Labs to

35


keep equipments instruments and consumables.

Thus no improvement has been made in its Labs, Play Grounds and Library etc. After issues of the Show Cause Notice.

NRC Therefore decided to refuse recognition to the institution for B.P.Ed. Course Under Section 15 (3) (b) of the NCTE Regulation.

The NRC also decided that institution be issued Show Cause Notice Under Section 17 of the NCTE Act for withdrawal of recognition of its existing B.Ed. Course on the following grounds:

(a) The built up area made available for 200 seats of B.Ed. Course is not adequate and as per NCTE Norms in view of its existing area being used for other courses. There is no specific earmarked area for B.Ed. Course and facilities for B.Ed. Course are located at different places over the College building.

(b) The Labs of the Institution for B.Ed. Course, particularlly the ICT Resources Centre and Science and Maths Resources Centre have not been developed as per recommendation of NCTE, as contained in its Manual for organising Teaching learing Resources in teacher education institution.

(c) Psychology Lab is not adequate for 200 students.

12. UP-3507

Ramdev Memorial Mahavidyalaya, Plot No. 1950/1, State Highway (Azamgarh to Jaunpur), VPO- Ranipur Razmo, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh.

B.Ed The reply of the institution dated 20.12.2010 with response to the points of Show Cause Noticed has been carefully considered and the fresh photographs submitted has been perused, and following observation made:-

The institution has not taken any steps to make up the deficiencies pointed out in the Show Cause Notice. The observation of the Visiting Team that the Multipurpose Hall of the institute is 93 Sq. Meter has been countered by a certificate by the “Kanungo’ duly signed by the Tehsildar on the application written by the Institution addressed to Tehsildar / Admn. Even if this certificate is accepted, the institution has not done anything for its ICT Resources Centre (Language Lab), which continues to be inadequate. Display of equipment on tables, surrounded by benches, without having a proper table and matching chair makes a mockery of a language Lab of a B.Ed college. Non-development of land around the building in the campus has been made. The observations in the show cause notice has been countered by the institution by a copy of the CLU, which certifies the land is non-agricultural. The campus around the building is not developed by the institution and

36


they did not take any effort even after Show Cause Notice to develop is as proper play grounds.

In view of the above NRC decided to refuse recognition to the institution for a B.Ed. Course Under Section 14 (3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993.

13. UP-3014

Waltech College of Education, Village – Uideypur, Post Office – Rajpura, Tehsil – Meerut, District – Meerut, Uttar Pradesh

B.Ed. The reply of the institution dated 29.12.2010 with response to the points of Show Cause Notice has been considered. The reply of the institution as to how shots of the Lab of other institution appeared in his CD has not been found satisfactory. The reply to other points related to Multipurpose Hall, Library and Lab has been accepted.

Hence, NRC decided to issue letter of intent prior to recognition under clause 7 (9) of the NCTE Regulation 2009 to the institution.

14. UP-2822

Kargil Shahid Mahavidylaya, Kachaura Road, Jaswant Nagar, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh.

M.ED. Reply of the institution dated 20.12.2010 in response to the points of the Show Cause Notice has been considered. The institution has submitted copies of various bills to substantiate theirs claim that they have made up the deficiencies pointed out in its existing set up so as to be eligible for recognition for M.Ed. Course. These bills cannot be accepted on their face-value, without any proof of payment, enteries in the stok register as proof of actual procurement. No photographs, CD etc. has been given to substantiate the claim that its labs and other facilities have been organised, as per NCTE Norms. However, the institution has not given any reply to the observation that they have not been able to organised B.Ed. Course since 2004-05. Hence, NRC, decided to refuse recognition to the institution under section 15 (3)(b) of the NCTE Act 1993.

NRC also decided that a Show Cause Notice be issued to the institution as to why their recognition to the B.Ed. Course may not be withdrawn under section 17 of the NCTE Act, in view of the serious deficiencies pointed out by the inspection team for M. Ed. Course, while indicating that they are not having infrastructure for that B.Ed. Course, as per NCTE Norms.

15. UP-2882

Majidun Nisa Girls Degree College, Village- Jumman Pura, Kopaganj PO, Tehsil- Mau Sadar, District – Mau-275305, Uttar Pradesh.

B.Ed. The institution reply dated 24.12.2010 with reference to the points of Show Cause Notice has been considered alongwith the documents, map and photographs submitted by the institution. The institution has established through a building plan, duly approved that it has a seprate built up area of 1568 Sq. Meter for its B.Ed. Programme and this is in addition to 467.58 Sq. Meter of area for its pre-existing B.A. Programme. Other replies regarding Psychology Lab, Language Lab and Library has been found satisfactory.

Hence, NRC decided to issue letter of Intent prior to recognition under Clause 7 (9) of the NCTE

37


Regulation, 2009.16. NRCA

PP116Kalindi College Baraut, Plot No. 820, Village & Post Office – Malakpur, Tehsil – Baraut, District – Bagpat – 250611, Uttar Pradesh

D.EL.Ed. The reply of the institution dated 01.01.2011 in response to the points of Show Cause Notice dated 16.12.2010 has been carefully considered alongwith the documents, photographs etc. submitted by the institution. The reply has not been found satisfactory. The Science and Maths Resource Centre continue to be as such. It does not give look of a proper lab. Institute has not done any thing to improve it even after the issue of Show Cause Notice. The reply regarding Computer Lab / ET Lab is evasive. In the new photographs, the chairs from other rooms have been kept, as the chair are not proper as computer chairs and it is difficult to work on Computers with these chairs.

The reply regarding Psychology Lab is not satisfactory. The list of test/equipments is inadequate. The so called lab had no storage arrangement for test/equipments etc. Institution did not do anything to develop its Psychology Lab, even after issue of the Show Cause Notice.

NRC decided that recognition of the institution be refused under such 14 (3) (b) of the NCTE Regulation 2009.

17. UP-2502

Indira Gandhi Girls Degree College, Rampur, Taramandal, District- Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh.

B.T.C 1. The reply of the institute dated 04.01.2011, in respect of the points of the Show Cause Notice dated 07.12.2010 was considered The institution submitted an affidavit indicating that they have a total build up area 3500 Sq. Meter, with 1700 Sq. Meter earmarked for B. Ed., 590 Sq. Meter earmarked for B.T.C. (Proposed) and 1233 Sq. Meter earmarked for B. P. Ed. (Proposed). The corresponding building plan submitted by the instituion earlier with the application indicated a total built up area of only 1934 Sq. Meter. The institution has not submitted any building plan, indicating / earmarking the area for B.Ed. Course and proposed BTC Course indicating common facilities to be shared. The area in the building plan is less than the required area of 2500 Sq. Meter required for a B.Ed. and D.Ed. /BTC Course, Which the institution is not having. The institution is also conducting B.A. Course in the same building, which further reduces the availability of built up area for teacher training course. The institution submitted the same building plan for B.Ed. Course, which means that they have not provided any extra infrastructure for the proposed BTC Course.

2. The institute has not submitted a proper land document, only a copy of ‘Khatoni’ issued by ‘Kannungo’ has been submitted. In its affidavit the institution claimed that they possessed land of 20,444 Sq. Meter, on ownership basis for 3 years’. The affidavit submitted on 15.10.2007 is not supplemented by any authenticated land document.

3. The institute submitted a list of there existing of faculty

38


of B. Ed. Course. However, the date of appointment of the faculty members minutes of the selection committee and approval, if any, obtained from the university has not been submitted. It is doubtful whether the institution is having full complement of faculty / staff for its existing B. Ed. Course.

NRC, therefore decided to refuse recognition to the institution for the proposed BTC course for want of required infrastructure Under Section 15 (3) (b) of the NCTE Regulation.

The institution be also asked to send full details about existing faculty forthe B.Ed. Course and for that propose a show cause notice be issued under section 17 of the NCTE Act, in the relevant file.

18. UP-3207

Jai Shiv Academy College of Higher Education, Plot No- 81, Village- Dhanpura, Post- Kithore, District- Meerut- 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

B.ED The reply of the institution 10.01.2011 on the points of Show Cause Noticed has been considered. Institutions has made up the deficiencies pointed out earlier and has established it with photographs and Bill/Receipts etc. Hence NRC decided to issue letter of intent prior to recognition under clause 7 (9) of the NCTE Regulation 2009.

19. UP-3358

Chaudhary Ram Charitra Parmeshwar Prasad Mahavidyalaya, Plot No. 150, 152, Village – Moondadiha Khurd, Post Office – Puraina Mansoor, Tehsil – Rudhali, District – Basti, Uttar Pradesh.

B.ED The reply of the institute dated 11.01.2011, on the points of show cause has been considered. The institute made up the deficiencies pointed out in the Show Cause Notice. It has established its claim by photographs and a CD, which was also observed. Hence NRC decided to issue LOI, prior to recognition under clause 7 (9) of the NCTE Regulation.

20. UP-3415

Babu Rameshwar dayal Mahavidylaya, Plot No- 1161kh, 1034, 1153, 1160 g, Street no-Khanpur Grant, Village- Khanpur Grant, Post- Fattehpur, Tehsil- Lakhimpur Kheri, District-Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh

B.ED The reply of the institute of the dated 14.06.2010 with reference to the show cause notice dated 14.05.2010 and subsequent detailed reply with photographs / documents has been carefully considered. While the institution has made up certain deficiencies pointed out in the show cause notice, it remained evasive in its reply to the basic observation in the Show Cause Notice, based on the observation of the VT, that the class room, Lab and library and Multipurpose Hall is not properly furnished. The furniture comprising of long tables and long benches without back support, as shown in the reply to the show cause notice is not appropriate. Small size iron stools kept in the labs are not proper .Similarly seating capacity in the library continues to be temporary and shabby. The temporary arrangement of tables with lower plastic chairs is a proxy to the proper seating arrangement in the library.Only 3 seats and one washbasin as the Toilet Facility shown in the photographs is not sufficient for the staff and 100 students of B.Ed. Course.

The institute submitted a building plan duly approved having a total area of 2435.652 Sq. Meter, but the area earmarked

39


for B. Ed. Course has not been identified and the institution has shown the total building of the college, as if it is for the B.Ed. Course only. However, the area is different from the one indicated in the affidavit originally submitted with the application and as indicated in the building completion certificate i.e. 2231.226 Sq. Meter.

Hence, NRC decided that recognition be refused to the institute for the proposed B.Ed course under section 14 (3) (b) of the NCTE Act 1993 on the grounds mention above.

21. HR-1603

D.C.College Of Education, DCMS-Sector-7, VPO- Panchukala, Tehsil-Panchukala, Haryana

B.ED. The reply of the institute dated 13.01.2011 has been considered.

The Institution has not submitted any building plan, duly approved by the Competent Authority, for construction of the proposed B. Ed.college Building. All the building plan submitted are in the name of the D.C. Model School. Which indicate that the society has not constructed a separate building for the College. The reply also indicates that all building plan are 30 years old, which further establishes the fact that no building for the college has been constructed.

2. A site plan submitted for the proposed B.Ed. College building is not approved by any Competent Authority.

In view of the above NRC decided to refuse recognition to the institution for there proposed B.Ed course under section 14 (3) (b) of the NCTE Act 1993.

22. HR-1720

CH. Devi Lal Post Graduate Regional Centre, Sirsa-125055, Haryana

M.ED. The reply of the institute dated 10.01.2011 has been considered further. In view of the progress and improvement made in the infrastructure of Library & Psychology Lab etc. NRC decided to issue LOI, Under Clause 7 (9) of the NCTE Regulation 2009 prior to Recognition.

23. UP-3046

Hari College of Management, village- Ugraho, Gagalhari, District- Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh.

B.ED The reply of the institution dated 14.01.2011 with reference to the points of Show Cause Notice has been considered. The Science and Maths Resource Centre (referred as Science Lab in the Show Cause Notice) has still not been developed properly, as per recommendation of NCTE, in its Manual for organising Teaching learing Resources in teacher education institution. 2. The institution reply that all the facilities have been

provided has not been accepted in view of the poor facility that continue to exist. The sink and water arrangement in the lab is inproper/ inadequate. Adequate storage capacity for equipment/consumableshas not been provided, The ICT Resource Centre continue to be deficit, as language learning facilities has not yet been developed.

3. Similarly in the the Multipurpose hall, proper dais, with public address system hasnot been provided . Hall still does not have proper furnishing, fans and electrical

40


fittings.

Hence, NRC decided that recognition be refused to the institute for the proposed B.Ed course under section 14 (3) (b) of the NCTE Act 1993 on the grounds mention above.

24. UP-3519

Janhit Degree College, Plot No- 96, Street Number- Roorki Chutmalpur Road, Village- Gangali, District- Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh.

B.Ed. The reply of the institution dated 17.01.2011 on the show cause notice dated 16.12.2010 has been considered. The institution’s claim that existing built up area is as per NCTE Norms and its third floor, is under construction for further development cannot be accepted. No course can be sanctioned in a building which is still under construction. As such, the bulding completion certificate submitted at the time of Inspections is not valid.2. The infrastructure provided by the institution continue to

be inadequate. The claim of the institution in the reply to the show cause notice that the deficiency had been made up cannot be accepted as the new photographs submitted by the institution clearly reflect that no attempt whatsoever has been made to build up the Psychology lab, Science and Math’s Recourse Center. Display of equipments, apparatus and models etc. on the table on temporary bases cannot be treated as development laboratory.

3. Multipurpose hall continue to remain inadequate; the claim of the institution that it had provided required facilities, without any proof of having done so in form of photographs, bills/ entry in stock register, etc cannot be accepted.

4. The deficiency pointed out in the library continue to exist as photograph of an additional reading room cannot be taken as development of seating capacity in the library.

5. No CD about development of play ground has been submitted by the institution, despite writing so in the reply.

In view of above the reply of the institution to the show cause notice has not been accepted and NRC decided that recognition of the institution for the B.Ed. course be refused under section 14 (3) (b) of NCTE Act 2009.

25. NRCAPP399

Abhay Pratap Singh Degree College, Plot No. 1169.1170, Kunwarpur Road, Vill- Jafrabad, Post- Bindaki, Tehsil- Bindaki, District- Fatehpur- 212635, U.P.

D.EL.ED Reply of the institution dated 18.01.2011 was considered. NRC decided to constitute a VT.

26. UP-

1434

New Adarsh Institute of

Education, Loni- Near

L.P.G. Gas Plant,

Ghaziabad, Uttar

B.T.C. Reply of the institution dated 07.02.2011 has been considered. Approval of the Controller of Examination be awaited.

41


Pradesh.

27. NRCA

PP-314

Chandavan Institute of Education, Plot no. 1480, Street- Bhartpur Road, Village- Mauja, Maholi, Post- Dholi Pyau, Tehsil + District – Mathura-281001, Uttar Pradesh

D.EL.ED The reply of the institution dated 08.02.2011, enclosing therewith the copy of the earlier replies dated 20.04.2010 has been carefully considered and following observation made.

(a) The institution has not yet submitted the required certified copy of the land document (Nakal) as obtained from the office of the Register/sub-register (Land). It did obtain a certified copy vide stamp no. 86AA 262993, but its’ photocopies has been submitted and original documents as obtained from the office of the registrar land has not been submitted.

(b) The specification and other infrastructure facility indicated in the application form shows that the institution’s multipurpose hall is of the size of only 93.73 Sq. meter, which is much less than the required 2000 Sq Feet as per NCTE Norms.

(c) The Institution in its existing building having the total built up area 5859.99 sq meter also conducts various other courses like BBA, BCA, B.Sc. (Computer Science) etc. and B. Ed. The institution has not indicated the total area earmark for its existing B. Ed. and proposed B. El. Ed. Course.

(d) The institution has not yet submitted the FDR’s of Rs. 5 lakh and Rs.3 lakh as endowment fund and reserve fund.

Hence, the show cause notice be issued on above grounds under section 14 (3) (b) of NCTE Act 1993, for a reply within 30 days.

28. UP-3300

Baijnath Mahvidyalaya, Plot No- 325, Street Number- Shaiyabad Road, Village- Budhanpur, Post- Surhurpur, Tehsil- Zakhiniya, District- Ghazipur- 275205, Uttar Pradesh.

B.ED The institute’s reply provided the experience certificate of the primary which is from a school namely Smt. Janki Devi Balika Inter College, Allahabad, Whereas it was required to provide the experience certificate of the teaching in a B.Ed College, for a period of 5 years on regular basis.

Hence, the Institute be asked to clarify, before recognition to the institution is refused for B.Ed course for its unability to appoint faculty as per NCTE Norms

29. NRCAPP305

NT Degree College, Plot No. 1, Vill- Kamanpur, Post- Said Nagli, Tehsil- Hasanpur, District- Jyotiba Phule Nagar- 244242, U.P.

B.ED Reply of the institution dated 21.02.2011 considered and NRC decided to constitute VT.

30. UP-2976

NKBR COLLEGE OF PROFESSIONAL

M.Ed. Point wise reply of the institution dated 21.02.2011 has been considered and NRC decided to constitute the VT.

42


STUDIES, MEERUT-HAPUR ROAD, PHAPHUNDA, MEERUT, UP

31. UP-2982

Asha Degree College, Vill- Dhirajijot, Post- Sikhari, Tehsil- Jakhaniya, District- Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh

B.Ed. The reply of the institution in respect to various points of show cause notice has been carefully considered, and following observation were made:-i. The building plan submitted, earmarking separate space

for B.Ed. course has not been accepted for the reason that an area on 1100 Sq meters has been earmarked for the Arts faculty, having graduate level course with enrolment of over 1000 students. Earmarking on the map is therefore not natural and has been done to show the requirement of the space as per NRC Norms. The size of the multipurpose hall meant for the B.Ed. course remains only 1100 Sq. feet, much less than the requirement of 2000 Sq. feet as per NRC Norms.

ii. The Photograph of the Labs submitted to show that they have been developed, do not generate any confidence and Labs continue to remain deficit. The Labs have still not been developed with proper experimental tables having water/ drainage arrangement. There is visibly no storage capacity to keep equipments and consumables, similarly in the Psychology Lab; there is no arrangement for storage of tests, equipment etc. The language Labs continue to suffer with the deficiencies pointed out earlier.

iii. The photographs submitted for improvement in the class room furniture cannot be accepted as proof of improvement, in the absence of supporting documents related to purchase of furniture, payments made on this the account, entry in the stock register etc.

In new of above, NRC decided to refuse recognition to the institution under clause 14(3) (b) for the proposed B.Ed. course.

32. PB-688

Baba Mangal Singh Institute of Education, Post-Bhughipura, Barnala Road, Moga, Punjab

B.Ed. (Additional)

The reply of the institution dated 28.06.2010 in respect to the Show Cause Notice dated 27.04.2010 has been considered and following observations made : 1. The institution has not responded to the specified 6

points raised in the Show Cause Notice dated 27.04.2010. There is no reply to the effect that stock register, book issue register are not maintained by the institution. Similarly no reply has been given about maintenance of Staff attendance Register and payment of Salary Register / record. Replies to these questions were important in the context of the observation of the Visiting Team report about non-production of these documents at the time of inspection. Similarly no reply whatsoever has been given about poor drinking water

43


facility and non-availability of common rooms. The institution even did not responsd to these questions by stating that these facilities have not been provided.

2. The institution did not respond to the points in Show Cause Notice that they did not have requisite faculty as per NCTE Norms in their existing B.Ed. course of 100 intake. The reply is about fresh selection made by them on 9th August, 2009, just before the inspection scheduled for 18th August, 2009. During this selection, the institution selected 3 candidates including the principal for the existing B.Ed. course with 100 seats. Further, reply about selection of faculty for additional intake is not relevant at this stage, as the question essentially related to the availability of faculty for existing B.Ed. course.

Since the institution failed to satisfactory reply the Show Cause Notice given to the institution on 27.04.2010, the recognition sought for Additional Intake of 100 seats be refused on the above ground under section 15(3)(b) of NCTE Act 1993.

AGENDA ITEM:-180.08.CONSIDERATION OF VT REPORT UNDER CLAUSE 15 (3) (b) of NCTE Act, 1993

Sr. No.

File Code No.


Name of the Course

Decision of NRC

1. RJ-1276

Maharishi Dayanad B.Ed. College, Shri Ganga Nagar, Near Water Box, Shri Ganaga Nagar, , RAJASTHAN

E.T.E. The institution applied for the ETE course in June 2007. Deficiency letter was issued on 26-10-07 for a reply within 90 days. The institution sends a reply on 15.01..08, The reply has been considered on merit and following observation made:-

i. The institution has a total built up space of 1990 Sq. meter wherein it is conducting a B.Ed. course. As per NCTE Regulation of, a built up area of 3000 Sq meter is required for combined B.Ed and D.El.Ed course; the institution is not having the required built up space to conduct the two courses.

ii. The specification of rooms and other infrastructure available to the institution, as given in the application form does not match with the specification given in the building plan submitted by the institute. For example, institution indicated that it has a multipurpose hall of 538.58 Sq meters, whereas no room of this dimensions is available in

44


the building plan.iii. The institution is already conducting a B.Ed.

course but in its application for ETT course it has not indicated B.Ed. as one of the existing courses of the institution. Rather the proposed ETE course has been indicated in the column related to existing course.

iv. On the recommendation of the state Government, NCTE has imposed a total ban on further recognition of the new D.El.Ed course in the state of Rajasthan, to regulate the planned growth of the teacher training institutions in the state. There is no specific reason for recognition of this course by the society in this region/ area.

In the view of the above Show Cause Notice be issued to the institution for refusing recognition to the course Under Section 15 (3) (b) of NCTE Regulation 2009 on the above grounds.

2. HR-1676

OXFORD INTERNATIONAL COLLEG OF EDUCATION,VPO-ASRAWA,ADAMPUR, HISSAR, HARYANA

B.ED. The institution’s reply dated 01-11-2010 with respect to the points of deficiency letter issued on 3rd Nov 2010 on directions, from Appellate Authority has been considered and following observation made:-

I. The institution was not having land on ownership basis, on the date of application i.e. 15-05-08, hence the application was liable to be rejected as per clause 8 (7) (i) of the NCTE Regulation 2009.

II.The building plan submitted with the application was not approved by the competent authority, the same building plan has now been submitted, with the approval of a private Engineer and not with any ‘Govt. Authority’. However, the signatures on the blue print are undated.

III.The institution applied simultaneously for B. Ed. Course and for a D. Ed. Course on 14-05-2008, which is contrary similar to clause 8 (2) of the NCTE Regulation 2009. The institution application of D.Ed. course was rightly returned file NRC letter dated 11th march 2010.

The institution be issued a Show Cause Notice under section 15 (3) (b) of the NCTE, Act, 1993 before the application for B.Ed. course is rejected on the above grounds.

AGENDA ITEM:-180.9.CONSIDERATION OF VTR UNDER SECTION 8(11) OF NCTE ACT 1993 (SHIFTING OF PREMISES)

45


Sr. No.

File Code No.


Name of the Course

Decision of NRC

1. RJ-552 RAMANAND VIDYA MANDIR WOMEN TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, ALWAR, RAJASTHAN(SHIFTING OF PREMISES)

B.ED. The request of the institution for shifting to its own building was considered. VT constituted for inspection of the new building.

2. HR-14HR-113HR-257

HINDU COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, SONEPAT, HARYANA

B.ED.D.ED.J.B.T.

The request of the institution dated 12-01-11 for shifting to new premises has been considered. VT constituted for a combined inspection of various teacher training courses in the institution e.g. M.Ed., B.Ed., D. El. Ed., J.B.T.

3. UR-39 Jai Arihant Academic Institute, Arihant Puram, Academic City, Bareilly Road, Haldwani- 263139, Uttarakhand(Shifting of premises)

B.Ed.-

100

The reply of the institution dated 16-08-10 with respect to the Show Cause Notice dated 22-07-2010 has been considered. The reply has been found satisfactory. Institution be allowed to shift to it new premises at Halduchour, Haldwani, Nanital, Uttarakhand.

4. UP-858UP-2640

Krishna Institute of Management, Vill- Kitholi, Post- Jani, Tehsil- Meerut, District- Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. (Shifting of Premises)

B.Ed. The inspection of the institute was conducted on 29-11-2010, for grant of permission to the institution to shift to its own premises. The CD taken on the occasion could not be observed as it was not operative Following observations were made:-

(a) The visiting team could identify only 8 faculty members at the time of inspection, which indicates that institution has not been having full faculty, required as per NCTE Norms. The earlier faculty recruited in 2006 were not in position and only those recruited in 2010 could be verified. Even Principal’s credentials could not be verified by the visiting team.

(b) The procedure followed for recruitment of faculty made in 2010 has not been shown to the visiting team Members. Institution may therefore submit:

i. A copy of advertisement for recruitment, Composition of the selection committee, letter of the university nominating exerts/ nominees, approval of

46


the University for appointment of faculty in 2010.

(c) The institution has not submitted essential data sheet from giving details of the number of class rooms, dimensions of the class rooms, lab and multipurpose hall, which gives credence to the observation of the visiting team that the institution has not provided infrastructure commensurate to the additional intake.

In view of above Show Cause Notice be issued to the institution as to why the recognition granted for additional intake of 100 B.Ed. seats given to the institution in 2008 may not been withdrawn Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The permission to shifting to the new premises is however granted (The institution be asked to provide another copy of the CD taken at the time of inspection).

5. RJ-428 TAGORE WOMENS B.ED. COLLEGE, WARD NO-20, SURATGARH, SRIGANGANAGAR-335804, RAJASTHAN

B.ED. The request of the institution dated 4-12-2010 for shifting to the premises has been considered VT constituted for inspection.

6. RJ-912 SWAMI VIVEKANAND ELEMENTARY TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES, HANUMANGARH TOWN, RAJASTHAN

STC The reply of the institution dated 25-12-2010 with respect to the NRC’s decision in the 174th meeting held on 08th -10th

Dec. 2010 has been considered. VT constituted for inspecting the new premises.

7. RJ-285 Bhagwati Teacher’s Training institute, Near Old Post Office, Chittorgarh-312001, Rajasthan

B.ED. The institutions letter dated 03-03-11 for permission to shift to new premises has been considered and following observation made:-1. Institution has not submitted the amount of Rs. 40,000/-

required with application for shifting.2. The institution appears to have been conducting the

course on the basis of LOI only and has not been issued formal recognition order Under Section 7(11) of the NCTE Regulation. A specific detail about the academic year during which the course has been conducted has not been provided along with the course affiliation by the

47


university for each year of the course.

The institution be issued Show Cause Notice as to why its recognition be not refused in view of the non issue of formal recognition order and continuance of the course in volition to the condition stipulated in the letter of intent prior to recognition dated 30.04.08.

AGENDA ITEM:-180.10.CONSIDERATION OF THE VTR UNDER SECTION 17

Sr. No.

File Code No.


Name of the Course

Decision of NRC

1. HP-96/HP-135

Modern Education College, Near Anand Marga School, Anadale, Lower kaithu, Distt- Shimla-171003, Himachal Pradesh

B.ED. 1. A complained was received, against the institution on 6th

July, 2010, alleging that the institution is running large number of courses, including a residential school with the name St.-Xavior School and approval for B. Ed. and JBT courses in the building in a fraudulent manner. The school was closed for the day of inspection, so as to show the available infrastructure of school for B.Ed. and JBT Courses. Moreover, it was alleged that the intuition was not having proper and adequate Faculty for the said Teacher Training Courses.

2. The institution was inspected in August, 2009 and the inspection report was positive. As such, the institution was allowed to continue in May, 2010. The complaint came immediately thereafter In view of the nature of complaint that the infrastructure of School was shown in a fraudulent manner to the inspection team, another V.T. was constituted, which visited the institution on 02.11.2010, for the inspection.

3. The Management of the College however, refused to get the inspection of the college done, when the visiting team reached the school. This was in utter disregard to the rights’ of the NCTE under section 17 of the NCTE Act 1993.4. The CD taken at the time of last inspection on

20.09.2009 was therefore again perused and it was found that the inspection was got conducted in the building of St. Xavier’s Residential School, Sunder Nagar, Mandi - 174401, Himachal Pradesh. A brochure of the school having the picture of the school was received alongwith the complaint by NCTE. The two buildings were same, which clearly establishes that the inspection was got conducted in School building, by closing the School on the day of inspection.

5. A perusal of the CD also indicated clearly that the class rooms shown to the NRC’s VT were having small sized

48


furniture comprising of double desks with attached benches, which are used in Schools. Even the size of the furniture as visible in the CD, clearly indicated that, it was meant for School children. NRC decided that the institution be issued a show cause notice under section 17 of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the institution, for conducting the B.Ed. and JBT Course in violations of the NCTE Norms and for refusing the inspection of the institution proposed by the NRC. A copy of the Pamphlet with the photograph of the School may also provided to the management. Reply be submitted within 30 days.

2. HR-1448

MAHABIR COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, VPO- BULLANA, DISTT-AMBALA, HARYANA,

B.ED. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 21.10.2009. The report is positive about availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities. The V.T. Categorically mentioned that there are no courses other than the B. Ed. Course being run in the building.NRC decided that institution may continue as a recognized institution for B. Ed. Course with an intake of 100 seats.

3. DH-113 (B.ED.)DH-151 (M.ED.)

GEETA RATAN JINDAL TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE, D-BLOCK, SECTOR-7, ROHINI, DELHI-110085

B.ED.

M.ED.

The institution refused to get the inspection conducted by the visiting team of NCTE on 24-06-10, on the consideration that the clause under which inspection was proposed was (inadvertently) mentioned as Section 14/15 instead of section 17. It is understood that after recognition of this M.Ed. program by NCTE, GGISP University New Delhi did not allow affiliation due to lack of infrastructure facilities as per NCTE norms.

Hence, NRC decided that the current status of the course in terms of affiliation for its M.Ed. course by University may be obtained. Meanwhile, inspection under section 17 of the NCTE Act may be conducted for its B.Ed. course, in view of the feedback received from the University about the institution.

4. PB-267

Bawa Nihal Singh B.Ed. College,Bawa Nihal Singh Street, Dist- Muktsar-152026, Punjab

B.ED. The inspection report of the institution for the inspection conducted on 25- 06-10 along with relevant document in the file has been carefully considered and following observation made:

I. The institution has a total built up area of 5741 Sq. feet, wherein a B.Ed. course was recognized in Aug, 2006 and an additional intake was also given for another 100 seats in 2008. The built-up area is totally inadequate to conduct even one unit of B.Ed. course for which a 1500 Sq. meter area is required. The continuation of this course with such a meager built up area is in violation of the NCTE Regulation and even norms that existed in 2008.

II. The inspection observed and found that the institution was having only 1 Principal and 5 teachers at the time of inspection. The institution submitted another list of 8 teachers who were appointed by the institution by a local

49


selection committee just before this inspection for the ensuing session of 2010-2011 and send it to university for approval. It clearly establishes that the institution was not having proper faculty as per NCTE norms to conduct two units of B.Ed. course. One or two vacancies could have been alright but then selection of 8 faculties just before inspection, clearly establishes that institution has been running without adequate faculty.

The institution has thus, been running its B.Ed. course in total violation of the NCTE norms with lack infrastructure and instructional facilities required as per norms. Hence, NRC decided to issue Show Cause Notice to the institution Under Section 17 of NCTE Act 1993 for a reply within 30 days.

5. UP-1276

Shri Ji Baba Institute, Semari , Post - Chhata, Nh -2, Mathura, U.P.

B.ED. The Visiting Team report was positive. The institution has necessary infrastructure as per NCTE Norms. The Inspection Team is however silent about actual verification of the Faculty and its to credential. As such, institution may be asked to provide current list of its faculty along with the relevant documents about their selection i.e. Advertisement, nomination of experts by University, signed list of candidates who attended the interview , minutes of the selection committee and approval of the University to the appointments of Faculty. Reply be obtained within 30 days.

6. UP-1261

Surya Educational Institute, Bye Pass Road, Farah, Mathura, U.P

B.Ed. The VT report has been perused, CD taken at the time of inspection did not open. Following observations were made:

i. The land / building is in the name of society and has not been transferred in the name of institution as required under clause 8(7) (iv) of the NCTE Regulation

ii. The institution has not submitted a consolidated list of its faculty, giving details of their qualification etc. along with details of the selection process i.e. Advertisement, nomination of expert by University, signed list of candidates who attended the interview, minutes of selection committee and approval of the University for the Appointment of faculty.

The institution be issued a Show Cause Notice for a reply within 30 days under section 17 of the NCTE Act.

7. UP-1246

Ram Raji Devi Mahila

Mahavidyalaya, Vill-

Surai, Post- Sathiyav,

District- Azamgarh,

B.Ed. The institution inspection was conducted under section 17 of the NCTE Act vide NRC’s , decision in its 162nd meeting, In the context of the letter from the affiliating university on 21-11-05 about non- availability of faculty in the institution. The VTR along with the CD has been carefully considered and following observation were made:-

50


U.P. i. The institution is not having adequate built up area, as per NCTE norms. It has only 6300 Sq. feet, as against required 1500 Sq. meter.

ii. The institution has extremely poor instructional infrastructure. None of its laborites are developed. Science lab has no fixed structures, computer room has no computer tables and matching chair. Psychology lab is very shabby and without adequate storage capacity etc.

iii. The classroom furniture of the institution is not up to the mark. The long tables with long benches having no back support are not suitable.

iv. The institution did not appoint staff on regular basis. The faculty was stated to have gone to the University for Selection on 20-08-2010, on the day of inspection. It clearly establishes that institution did not appoint the required faculty on regular basis but was appointing faculty on year to year basis, which is in violation to the NCTE norms.

Show Cause Notice be issued to the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act, before recognition of the institution is withdrawn for non observance of NCTE norms of infrastructure and instructional facilities.

8. RJ-1279

ST. WILLFIRED’s Teachers Training College, Sector-10, Meera Marg, New Sanganer Road, Mansarovar, Jaipur

B.ED. The institution was inspected on 29-08-2010. The VT, CD taken at the time of inspection was considered and following observation were made:

I. The teacher training college is part of a complex having so many courses including a P.G. College and Senior Secondary School. The institution has not earmarked specific space for teacher training courses and at the time of inspection school space and its class room were shown to the VT members, as evident from the CD shown that the class room furniture was that of school children.

II. The institution had not organized its lab. As pointed out by VT, rooms, with required equipment displayed at the time of inspection were shown instead of labs.

III. The institution was given additional intake in 2nd May 2008. At the time of sanction of additional intake 1 + 7 faculty was shown for the existing course. However, at the time of inspection only 3 of the old faculty was available and all other were newly appointed. In view of process of attrition some changes in

51


the faculty is understood, but non availability of most of the old faculty indicates that the institute is not appointing faculty on regular basis, which is in violation of the NCTE norms. This is further established from the fact that 12 out of the 15 faculty in the list submitted in April 2008 were not found in the institution in the faculty list submitted at the time of inspection.

IV. In the list of faculty submitted to the inspection team , Faculty members were appointed in August, 2010, i.e. just before the inspection , This clearly shows that institution was not having full faculty as per NCTE norms and was running the course with inadequate faculty. These appointment were not made by following due process of selection and were not appointed by the University.

2. NRC received a complaint about the institution that it admits students and without their attending classes gives attendance and ultimately the degree. A specific name of Shri Desh Deepak Pathak has been given, who was on the regular staff of Maheshwari Public School but was also admitted by the institution and was given fake attendance. Institution needs to explain its position.

A Show Cause Notice be issued to the institution on the above noted ground under section 17 of the NCTE Act, before recognition of the institution is withdrawn for the B.Ed. course from the forthcoming academic session.

9. HR-1705 (B.ED Add.)HR-405 (B.ED)HR-1263 (D.Ed.)

Rao Mohar Singh College of Education, Vill-Behrampur, PO- Fazilpur, Distt- Gurgaon-122001, Haryana

B.ED. Add.B.EDD.Ed.

The inspection of the institution for its B.ed (200 seats) and D.Ed (50 seats) under section 17 was conducted the visiting team report was found positive and it corroborated with the CD taken on the occasion the institution has the Physical infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms. The institution be allowed to continue its recogination.

10. HP-218

Modern Education College, Near Anand Marga School, Anadale, Lower Kaithu, Distt- Shimla-171003, Himachal Pradesh

B.Ed. Since after inspection on 16-08-2009 under section 17, the institution was allow to continue its recognition for B.Ed. course, fresh inspection was not needed.


52


CONSIDERATION OF SHOW CAUSE REPLY UNDER SECTION 17

Sr. No.

File Code No.


Name of the Course

Decision of NRC

1. HR-1193

GANPATI INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, VILL- KAROLI, Post- Bashipur, Tehsil- Narnol, Distt- Mahindergarh, Haryana.

B.ED. A show cause notice was issued to the institution on 5 th Feb 2010, under section 17. The reply of the institution dated 17-02-2010 was considered in respect of the points of in the show cause notice, the reply was found to be in order.NRC decided that the recognition of institution for its B.Ed. course be continued.

2. DH-240/DH-236/DH-238/DH-79/DL-2/DL-54

Vidya Traning Institute Vidhya Bhawan, Bangla Sahib Road, Opp. Kali Mandir Connaught Place, New Delhi- 110001

ETT (Add.)/NTT (Add)/Pre- School/ETT (Add)/ETT/NTT

In view of a public notice issued by Vidya Training Institute, Vidya Bhawan, New Delhi that they are offering a one-year course in Primary Teacher’s Training (PTT) and Early Childhood Care Education, NRC vide its letter dated 5 th May 2010, asked the institution to explain its position. The specific issue was that they were alleged to be offering an un-recognised course, under the garb of various courses recognised by NCTE and were in a way misguiding the public at large, by way of offering an unrecognised course, when they were themselves recognised by NCTE for a large no. of teacher training courses.

2. In their explanation dated 20th May 2010, the institution explained that their one-year course of Early Childhood Care Education (ECCE), was recognised by NIOS and that they were offering this course through distance mode.

3. The explanation has been carefully considered by NRC. It is noted that the advertisement given by the institution clubbed two courses eg. Primary Teacher Training and ECCE together. While ECCE is recognised by NIOS, there seems to be no recognition for the P.T.T. course. Thus, either the institution is conducting two different course i.e. P.T.T. course of one-year duration and another ECCE course of one-year duration or else the institution has pre-fixed PTT with their recognised ECCE course to give an impression

53


that this NIOS recognised course is recognised as a primary teacher training course as well. This amounted to misleading as student would be undergoing this course thinking that it is a recognized course but would not be eligible for any employment as a primary school teacher, on completion of the course.

4. The perusal of reply also does not clarify whether by pre-fixing PTT, the institution has made the course as a full-time course instead of awarding them through distance learning mode. The institution has not supported its reply through a copy of the certificate that they have been awarding to the students, after successful completion of the course, so as to establish that they are awarding certificates only for ECCE course. The institution has also not furnished the details of the no. of students trained for the ECCE course w.r.t. the no. approved by the NIOS.

5. In view of above, it is clear that the institution despite the fact that it is recognised by NCTE for 150 seats of ETE course, 150 seats for NTT course and 50 seats of pre-school teacher education course has been indulging in malpractice by separately, conducting a course with a nomenclature of PTT for which no recognition whatsoever was given by NCTE. This institution clearly devised the nomenclature to misguide the public in general. The pass out of the course would not be eligible for employment as a teachers to teach in a primary school.

6. The institution be issued a show cause notice under section 17 of the NCTE Act, 1993, as to why recognition given to them for ETE, NTT and Pre-school Teacher Education course by NCTE may not be withdrawn in view of their indulgence in the above malpractice, which is in total contravention to the provisions of the NCTE Act, 1993.

Hence, NRC decided that a Show Cause

54


Notice under section 17 of the NCTE Act, 1993 be issued to the institution on the above points for reply within 30 days before recognition to all three courses recognised by NCTE are withdrawn.

The agenda Item related to New Applocation for the session 2011-2012. Consideration of VTR under section 17, Consideration of replies to the show cause notices issued under sectin 17 and complaints about different Institutions and other items which were in the agenda could not be taken up due to paucity of time.

The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to Chair.

(R.D. Sharma) (Hasib Ahmad) Convenor Chairperson

55

nrcncte.orgnrcncte.org/minutes_180th_NRC_meeting.doc · Web viewRJ-2042 Gurukul T.T. College,...

Documents

Transcript of nrcncte.orgnrcncte.org/minutes_180th_NRC_meeting.doc · Web viewRJ-2042 Gurukul T.T. College,...