The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

34
02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 1 The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A <10% test of general relativity everyday Prof. Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences 8.224 Seminar Fall 2001. http://www-gpsg.mit.edu/~tah

Transcript of The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

Page 1: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 1

The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A <10% test of

general relativity everydayProf. Thomas Herring

Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences

8.224 Seminar Fall 2001.http://www-gpsg.mit.edu/~tah

Page 2: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 2

Overview

• Original design of the Global Positioning System (GPS)

• Use by “non-authorized” users• Selected applications• Relativistic effects

Page 3: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 3

GPS Original Design

• Started development in the late 1960s as NAVY/USAF project to replace Doppler positioning system

• Aim: Real-time positioning to < 10 meters, capable of being used on fast moving vehicles.

• Limit civilian (“non-authorized”) users to 100 meter positioning.

Page 4: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 4

GPS Design• Innovations:

– Use multiple satellites (originally 21, now ~28)– All satellites transmit at same frequency– Signals encoded with unique “bi-phase,

quadrature code” generated by pseudo-random sequence (designated by PRN, PR number): Spread-spectrum transmission.

– Dual frequency band transmission:• L1 ~1.575 GHz, L2 ~1.227 GHz • Corresponding wavelengths are 190 mm and

244 mm

Page 5: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 5

Latest Block IIR satellite(1,100 kg)

Page 6: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 6

Measurements• Measurements:

– Time difference between signal transmission from satellite and its arrival at ground station (called “pseudo-range”, precise to 0.1–10 m)

– Carrier phase difference between transmitter and receiver (precise to a few millimeters)

– Doppler shift of received signal• All measurements relative to “clocks” in

ground receiver and satellites (potentially poses problems).

Page 7: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 7

Measurement usage

V(t, r x ) Vo sin[2 ( ftr k .r x ) C(t)]

C(t) is code of zeros and ones (binary).Varies discretely at 1.023 or 10.23 MHz

• “Spread-spectrum” transmission: Multiple satellites can be measured at same time.

• Since measurements can be made at same time, ground receiver clock error can be determined (along with position).

• Signal

Page 8: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 8

Measurements

• Since the C(t) code changes the sign of the signal, satellite can be only be detected if the code is known (PRN code)

• Multiple satellites can be separated by “correlating” with different codes (only the correct code will produce a signal)

• The time delay of the code is the pseudo-range measurement.

Page 9: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 9

Position Determination

(perfect clocks).

• Three satellites are needed for 3-D position with perfect clocks.

• Two satellites are OK if height is known)

Page 10: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 10

Position determination:

with clock errors: 2-D case

• Receiver clock is fast in this case, so all pseudo-ranges are short

Page 11: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 11

Positioning• For pseudo-range to be used for

positioning need:– Knowledge of errors in satellite clocks– Knowledge of positions of satellites

• This information is transmitted by satellite in “broadcast ephemeris”

• “Differential” positioning (DGPS) eliminates need for accurate satellite clock knowledge.

Page 12: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 12

GPS security: SA

• To stop non-authorized users from getting the full accuracy of GPS, the military until May 2000 “corrupted” the GPS signals.

• Selective Availability (SA) “dithered” the clocks by time equivalent of ±100 meters.

• Turned off because ineffective(Example shown later)

Page 13: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 13

GPS security: AS

• To ensure that military systems were not corrupted by false GPS transmission, Anti-spoofing (AS) in enabled on all satellites

• At L1 frequency: GPS satellites use two C(t) sequences: Course Acquisition C/A code and Precise Positioning code (P code)

• P-code in modified under AS to the Y-code which only authorized user know

Page 14: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 14

Satellite constellation

• Since multiple satellites need to be seen at same time (four or more):– Many satellites (original 21 but now 28)– High altitude so that large portion of Earth

can be seen (20,000 km altitude —MEO)

Page 15: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 15

Current constellation

• Relative sizes correct (inertial space view)

• “Fuzzy” lines not due to orbit perturbations, but due to satellites being in 6-planes at 55o inclination.

Page 16: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 16

Satellite Availability15o minimum elevation)

Satellite Availability (smallest number above

Page 17: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 17

Positioning accuracy

• Best position accuracy with pseudo-range is about 20 cm (differential) and about 5 meters point positioning.

• For many applications we want better accuracy

• For this we use “carrier phase” where “range” measurement noise is few millimeters

Page 18: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 18

Carrier phase positioning

• To use carrier phase, need to make differential measurements between ground receivers.

• Simultaneous measurements allow phase errors in clocks to be removed i.e. the clock phase error is the same for two ground receivers observing a satellite at the same time (interferometric measurement).

Page 19: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 19

Phase positioning

• Use of carrier phase measurements allows positioning with millimeter level accuracy and sub-millimeter if measurements are averaged for 24-hours.

Page 20: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 20-0.10

-0.05

0

0.05

0.10

8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Nor

th (m

)

Time (hrs)

Phase Differential Positioning

Scatter 0.008 m and 0.002 m

-200

-100

0

100

200

8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Nor

th (m

)

Time (hrs)

Pseudorange Point Positioning

Scatter 21 m and 23 m

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Nor

th (m

)

Time (hrs)

Pseudorange Differential Positioning

Scatter 0.20 m and 0.15 m

SA on Examples of

positioning results

Page 21: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 21

Summary

• Use of differential measurements with carrier phase allows very precise position determination (independent largely of security features).

• We use these measurements in Earth science for deformation studies and atmospheric studies

Page 22: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 22

Tectonic Deformation Results

• “Fixed GPS” stations operate continuously and by determining their positions each day we can monitor their motions relative to a global coordinate system

• Temporary GPS sites can be deployed on well defined marks in the Earth and the motions of these sites can be monitored (campaign GPS)

Page 23: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 23

Example of motions measured in Pacific/Asia region

• Fastest motions are >100 mm/yr

• Note convergence near Japan

More at http://www-gpsg.mit.edu/~fresh/MIT_IGS_AAC.html

Page 24: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 24

Motion after Earthquakes. Example from Hector Mine, CA

Continued motion tells us about material characteristics and how stress is re-distributed after earthquake

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

1999.0 1999.5 2000.0 2000.5 2001.0 2001.5 2002.0 2002.5 2003.0

Pre-Hector MinePost_Hector mine

Diff

eren

ce fr

om M

ean

(mm

)

Year

Time of Hector mine earthquake220 mm offset removed

RMS Scatter about linear trend 0.8 mm

Page 25: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 25

Relativistic effects

• General relativity affects GPS in three ways– Equations of motions of satellite– Rates at which clock run– Signal propagation

• In our GPS analysis we account for the second two items

• Orbits only integrated for 1-3 days and equation of motion term is considered small

Page 26: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 26

Clock effects

• GPS is controlled by 10.23 MHz oscillators• On the Earth’s surface these oscillators are

set to 10.23x(1-4.4647x10-10) MHz (39,000 ns/day rate difference)

• This offset accounts for the change in potential and average velocity once the satellite is launched.

• The first GPS satellites had a switch to turn this effect on. They were launched with “Newtonian” clocks

Page 27: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 27

Propagation and clock effects

• Our theoretical delay calculations are made in an Earth centered, non-rotating frame using a “light-time” iteration i.e., the satellite position at transmit time is differenced from ground station position at receive time.

• Two corrections are then applied to this calculation

Page 28: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 28

Corrections terms• Propagation path curvature due to Earth’s

potential (a few centimeters)

• Clock effects due to changing potential

• For e=0.02 effect is 47 ns (14 m)

2GMc3 ln Rr Rs

Rr Rs

GMc2 e a sin E

Page 29: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 29

Effects of Selective Availability

-200

0

200

400

600

800

0 4 8 12 16 20 24

PRN 03 (June 14)

Clock SA (ns) 1999Clock NoSA (ns) 2000

Clo

ck e

rror (

ns)

Time (hrs)

Page 30: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 30

Relativistic Effects

-50

-25

0

25

50

0 4 8 12 16 20 24

PRN 03 Detrended; e=0.02Clock - trend (ns)GR Effect (ns)

Clo

ck e

rror (

ns)

Time (hrs)

Page 31: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 31

Tests of General Relativity• In the parameterized post-Newtonian

formulation, the time delay expression becomes:

• In PPN, is the gravitational term. In general relativity = 1

• The clock estimates from each GPS satellite allow daily estimates of

GMc2

(1 )2

e a sin E

Page 32: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 32

Using GPS to determine • Each day we can fit a linear trend and once-

per-revolution sin and cos terms to the each of the 27-28 GPS satellites.

• Comparison between the amplitude and phase (relative to sin(E)) allows and estimate of gamma to be obtained

• Quadrature estimates allows error bound to be assessed (cos(E) term)

• Problem: Once-per-orbit perturbations are common. However should not be proportional to eccentricity.

Page 33: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 33

Initial “quick” results

Amplitude comparison only

Consistent with GR to <10%

Only 1 week of data: Data after May 2000 could be used.

Page 34: The Global Positioning System and Relativity: A

02/24/2003 8.224 Seminar 34

Conclusions• GPS dual-use technology: Applications in

civilian world widespread– Geophysical studies (mm accuracy)– Engineering positioning (<cm in real-time)– Commercial positioning: cars, aircraft, boats (cm

to m level in real-time)• Relativistic effects are large but largely

constant• However due to varying potentials and

velocities effects can be seen• Some effects are incorporated by convention• Need to keep in mind “negligible effects” as

accuracy improves