Syllabus Civil Qaqc Course Sdlinc 9600162099

SDL INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION EDUCATIONAL ACADEMY - SDLINC, CHENNAI.COURSE OFFERED SDLINC CERTIFIED CIVIL QA QCINSPECTOR ( Duration –30 days )

Course syllabus

Module 1 – Roles & responsibilities of QA/ QC Inspector

Module 2 - Introduction to the Company QMS ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards

Module 3 - International codes and standards

Module 4 - Concept of Quality Inspection

Module 5 - Classification of Civil work

Module 6 - Materials/specifications

Module 7 - Process Flow Diagram PFD Isometric Drawings

Module 8 - Types of Civil constuction

Module 9 - Preparation of Inspection procedures

Module 10 - NDT methods

Module 11 – Calibration of instrument / equipment, IMTE

Module 12 – Project Quality plan

Module 13 – Inspect as per inspection test plan (ITP’s ) and Preparation

Module 14 - Specific quality procedures and Preparation

Module 15 – Quality Control QC Job Brief on Receiving, In-process, Final Inspection

Module 16 - Implementation and Monitoring QA/QC system

Module 17 -Traceability, Punch list

Module 18 - Stage wise inspection B31.1/B31.3 / API 570 )

Module 19 - Final documentation, Inspection Report, Non Conformance Report, QA/QC

For any clarification please feel free to contact the undersigned at this e mail id [email protected] and in mobile +91 9600162099

Warm regards,

V Umashankar

Director ( Training, Recruitment Assistance & Corporate Relations)

Sridurgha Lakshmi Inc,

SDL INC Educational Society, 16, Netaji Colony, 1st cross street,

Velachery, Chennai - 600042, Tamilnadu ,India

Mobile/Cell : +919600162099

E Mail : [email protected]

[email protected], [email protected]

http://www.indiamart.com/sridurgha-lakshmi-incorporation

http://in.linkedin.com/pub/v-umashankar-ceo-sdl-hr-academy-ndt-qa-qc-9600162099/48/204/61a

http://siragu.com/?p=4706

Table of Contents

1. Tests on Cement

1.1 Fineness 1

1.2 Consistency 3

1.3 Initial and final setting time 5

1.4 Soundness 7

2. Tests on Aggregates

2.1 Sieve analysis 9

2.2 Water absorption 13

2.3 Aggregate abrasion value 15

2.4 Aggregate impact value 18

2.5 Aggregate crushing value 21

3. Tests on Fresh Concrete

3.1 Workability 23

3.1.1 Slump 23

3.1.2 Compacting factor 25

3.1.3 Vee-Bee 27

4. Tests on Hardened Concrete

4.1 Non-destructive tests 29

4.1.1 Rebound hammer 29

4.1.2 Ultrasonic pulse velocity 31

4.2 Compression test 34

Contact: +91 9600162099 [email protected] CIVIL QAQC TRAINING COURSE INSTITUTE

5. Tests on Soil

5.1 Water content 38

5.1.1 Oven drying method 38

5.1.2 Calcium carbide method 41

5.2 Particle size distribution 44

5.3 Liquid limit 47

5.4 Plastic limit 50

5.5 Free swell index 52

5.6 Specific gravity 54

5.7 Maximum dry density and optimum moisture content 57

5.8 In-situ dry density 61

5.8.1 Core cutter method 61

5.8.2 Sand replacement method 63

6. Tests on Blanket Material 68

7. Tests on Bitumen

7.1 Bitumen content 72

7.2 Specific gravity 74

7.3 Marshall stability 76

7.4 Penetration 78

7.5 Flash point and fire point 80

7.6 Softening point 83

7.7 Ductility 86

ANNEXURES 89 to 99

List of suppliers of material testing equipmentsalongwith their addresses 100


1. TESTS ON CEMENT

1.1 FINENESS

AIM

To determine the fineness of cement by dry sieving as perIS: 4031 (Part 1) - 1996.

PRINCIPLE

The fineness of cement is measured by sieving it through astandard sieve. The proportion of cement, the grain sizes ofwhich, is larger than the specified mesh size is thus determined.

APPARATUS

FIG. 1 : IS SIEVE

i) 90µm IS Sieve

ii) Balance capable of weighing 10g to the nearest 10mg

iii) A nylon or pure bristle brush, preferably with 25 to 40mmbristle, for cleaning the sieve

1


PROCEDURE

i) Weigh approximately 10g of cement to the nearest 0.01g andplace it on the sieve.

ii) Agitate the sieve by swirling, planetary and linearmovements, until no more fine material passes through it.

iii) Weigh the residue and express its mass as a percentage R1,

of the quantity first placed on the sieve to the nearest 0.1percent.

iv) Gently brush all the fine material off the base of the sieve.

v) Repeat the whole procedure using a fresh 10g sample toobtain R2. Then calculate R as the mean of R1 and R2 as apercentage, expressed to the nearest 0.1 percent. When theresults differ by more than 1 percent absolute, carry out athird sieving and calculate the mean of the three values.

REPORTING OF RESULTS

Report the value of R, to the nearest 0.1 percent, as the residueon the 90µm sieve.

2


CONTENTS

CHAPTER-1 NON - DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF BRIDGES -GENERAL

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Concrete Bridges 1

1.3 Steel Bridges 4

1.4 Masonry Bridges 5

CHAPTER-2 NON – DESTRUCTIVE TESTS FOR STRENGTHESTIMATION OF CONCRETE

2.1 Rebound hammer test (Schmidt Hammer) 6

2.1.1. Object 62.1.2 Principle 72.1.3 Methodology 82.1.4 Procedure for obtaining correlation 9

between compressive strength of concreteand rebound number

2.1.5 Interpretation of results 102.1.6 Standards 11

2.2 Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Tester 11

2.2.1 Object 112.2.2 Principle 122.2.3 Methodology 132.2.4 Determination of pulse velocity 172.2.5 Interpretation of Results 182.2.6 Factors influencing pulse velocity 19

measurements

2.3 Combined use of Rebound hammer and Ultrasonic 23 Pulse Velocity Method

CIVIL QAQC +91 9600162099

[email protected]

SRIDURGHA LAKSHMI INC

2.4 Pull Off Test 23

2.4.1 Object 242.4.2 Principle 242.4.3 Methodology 252.4.4 Advantages and Limitations 262.4.5 Standards 27

2.5 Pull out Test 27


2.6 The Break-off Test 30


2.7 Penetration Resistance Methods 36


CHAPTER-3 NON – DESTRUCTIVE TESTS FOR CORROSIONASSESSMENT, LOCATION AND DIAMETER OFREINFORCEMENT AND COVER THICKNESS OFCONCRETE BRIDGES

3.1 Introduction 39

3.2 Half-cell Potential Measurement Method 39

CIVIL QAQC +91 9600162099

[email protected]

3.2.1 Object 413.2.2 Principle 413.2.3 Methodology 423.2.4 Interpretation of test results 433.2.5 Limitations 443.2.6 Standards 44

3.3 Resistivity Test 44

3.3.1 Object 453.3.2 Principle 453.3.3 Methodology 473.3.4 Limitations 47

3.4 Tests for carbonation of Concrete 47

3.5 Test for chloride content of concrete 48

3.6 Profometer 48

3.6.1 Object 493.6.2 Principle 493.6.3 Methodology 503.6.4 Advantages and Limitations 51

3.7 Micro Covermeter 51


CHAPTER-4 NON – DESTRUCTIVE TESTS FOR DETECTIONOF CRACKS / VOIDS / DELAMINATIONS ETC. INCONCRETE BRIDGES

4.1 Introduction 54

4.2 Infrared thermographic techniques 54

4.2.1 Object 56

CIVIL QAQC +91 9600162099

[email protected]

4.2.2 Principle 564.2.3 Methodology 564.2.4 Advantages & Limitations 57

4.3 Acoustic Emission Technique 58

4.3.1 Object 604.3.2 Principle 604.3.3 Methodology 614.3.4 Limitations 61

4.4 Short Pulse Radar Method 62


4.5 Stress Wave Propagation Methods 65

4.5.1 Pulse Echo method 664.5.2 Impact Echo Method 674.5.3 Impulse Response method 68

CHAPTER-5 NON – DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF STEELBRIDGES

5.1 Introduction 70

5.2 Liquid Penetrant Inspection 70

5.2.1 Methodology 715.2.2 Material Properties 725.2.3 Advantages and Disadvantages 73

5.3 Magnetic Particle Inspection 73

5.3.1 Principle 745.3.2 Equipments and Methodology 76

CIVIL QAQC +91 9600162099

[email protected]

5.4 Eddy Current Testing 78

5.4.1 Methodology 795.4.2 Advantages and Limitations 81

5.5 Radiographic Testing 81

5.5.1 Methodology 815.5.2 Advantages and Limitations 82

5.6 Ultrasonic Inspection 83

5.6.1 Principle 835.6.2 Calibration and reference standards 865.6.3 Application of Ultrasonic Testing Method 87

CHAPTER-6 NON – DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF MASONRYBRIDGES

6.1 Introduction 89

6.2 Flat Jack Testing 89

6.3 Impact Echo Testing 90

6.4 Impulse Radar Testing 91

6.5 Infrared Thermography 92

LIST OF FIRMS DEALING WITH NDT EQUIPMENTS 93

REFERENCES 94

CIVIL QAQC +91 9600162099

[email protected]

CHAPTER

III

Planning, Controlling,and Assuring Productand Process Quality

PROCESSES FOR PLANNING PRODUCT AND SERVICEDEVELOPMENT

All but the most simple products contain very large numbers of features. In theory,every feature of every unit produced could be inspected and judged against the require-ments. However, this would add considerable cost to the product while, for most features,adding little or no value to the customer. The producer is faced with the need for estab-lishing a hierarchy of importance for the various characteristics of the product. Which fea-tures are so important that they deserve a great deal of attention? Which need only amoderate amount of attention? Which need only a cursory inspection? The activity ofarriving at this determination is known as classification of characteristics.

In practice, characteristics are usually classified into the categories critical, major, andminor. The terms can be defined in simple terms as follows:

Critical characteristic—Any feature whose failure can reasonably be expected to pres-ent a safety hazard either to the user of the productor to anyone depending on theproduct functioning properly.

Major characteristic—Any feature, other than critical, whose failure would likely resultin a reduction of the usability of the product.

Minor characteristic—Any feature, other than major or critical, whose failure wouldlikely be noticeable to the user.

Incidental characteristic—Any feature other than critical, major, or minor.Of course, it is possible to develop classification schemes that are more detailed.

However, the above definitions suffice for the vast majority of applications. Most oftenclassifications of critical characteristics are noted on the drawing as well as in the manu-facturing plan, as well as in such other ways as to give the user ample warning of poten-tial hazards.

.

SDLINC QUALITY QAQC TRAINING INSTITUTEContact: +91 9600162099 [email protected]

Syllabus Civil Qaqc Course Sdlinc 9600162099

Documents

Transcript of Syllabus Civil Qaqc Course Sdlinc 9600162099