RTF Subcommittee Meeting
description
Transcript of RTF Subcommittee Meeting
RTF Subcommittee Meeting
RTF Technical Support Needs for Small & Rural Utilities
October 27, 2010
1
Agenda
Introductions Review revised project timeline Analysis methodology Analysis findings Next steps Q&A
2
Revised Project Timeline
3
October 27 Subcommittee meeting to discuss revised schedule and overall approach to analyzing the measure data from the PTR and C&RD.
October 29 All data due to Ecotope (w/ exception of IDEA and maybe PNGC…)
November 19 Ecotope sends draft list of utilities and proposed interview questions to subcommittee for review
December 2/3 Subcommittee meeting – list of utilities finalized; discuss interview questions.
December 6-10
Ecotope to start scheduling interviews
December 10 Final interview questions
December 13 – January 21
Utility interviews
February 11 Draft report due February 18 Subcommittee to provide feedback on draft reportFebruary 21-25
Subcommittee meeting – presentation on draft report
March 1 Presentation on draft report to full RTFMarch 18 Final report due
Interim Analysis Methodology
4
Characterize utilities– Clean/prune data (remove misc. “non-utility” entities)– Small (<15 aMW)– Rural (LDD recipients)– Residential (> 60%)
Use 2007-2010 PTR dataset as base – C&RD to be available for next round– PNGC and IDEA pools to be broken out in next round
Develop measure bins based on PTR categories
Develop high-level summaries of measure implementation behavior
Analysis Categories Renewables Measure Bins
– Commercial Envelope– Commercial Equipment– Commercial Lighting– Commercial Third Party– Residential Appliances– Residential Envelope– Residential HVAC– Residential Water Heating– Low Income Weatherization– Agricultural– Industrial – Utility Systems– Traffic Signals
5
Utility Breakdowns
Small = 41 Rural = 36 Small or rural = 77 Small/rural = 13 Residential = 36 Small/residential = 12 Rural/residential = 16 Small/rural/residential = 6
6
Potential Utility Selection Criteria
Utility characterization breakdowns
Volume of savings
Patterns of measure implementation of various utilities
Residential vs. commercial
Renewables vs. measures
Climate
7
Distribution of Utilities by Load & Customer Base (All Utilities)
8
Overall Distribution of Measures (All Utilities)
9
Overall Distribution of Measures, Not Renewables (All Utilities)
10
Distribution of Measures by Small/Rural
11
Distribution of Measures vs. Renewables by Small/Rural Utilities
12
Next Steps
Incorporate C&RD and individual utilities from PNGC and IDEA
Perform analysis on complete dataset
Take a closer look at individual measures, normalize across utilities for comparative analysis
Refine utility selection criteria
Develop list of recommended utilities
Develop draft survey questions
13
Questions & Answers
14
Ecotope Contact:Poppy Storm, Project Manager
4056 9th Avenue NE − Seattle, Washington, 98105PH: (206) 322-3753, FAX: (206) 325-7270
www.ecotope.com
15