Rotating Turbine Rig, Heat Transfer, Film Cooling
-
Upload
liberty-clemons -
Category
Documents
-
view
65 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Rotating Turbine Rig, Heat Transfer, Film Cooling
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Rotating Turbine Rig, Heat Transfer, Film Cooling
Facility: A new two-loop turbine specially designed for Film cooling/heat tarassfer measurement under rotating
condition.
Instrumentation used: Pressure Sensitive paints (PSP) for film cooling effectiveness
measurement
Temperature sensitive paints (TSP) for heat transfer measurement
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Rotating Turbine Rig, Aero-Performance Research Capability
Following figures give you an idea about the rotating turbine Aero-performance research capability
The turbine facility is designed to address aerodynamics, heat transfer and performance issues under rotating condition. The facility with its components is shown below schematically.
1 2 3 4c
5
7
1
2 4b
4a
6
5
7
Electric drive
Compressor
Honeycomb
Flow straightener
Research turbine
Turbine inlet with heater
Torque meter
9
7a Flex. couplings
8
8
4b4a
Calibrated Venturi3 Exit diffuser4c 9
107a
Traversing system
Silence chamber10
Dynamometer
6
7a
Turbine Rotor Specially Designed for Heat Transfer and Film Cooling
Rotor has two loops: an Internal cooling loop for purge flow through an inclined circumferential slot and an external loop for platform film cooling/heat transfer Experiments.
.
Mainstream Flow
Rotor-Seal Ejection Cooling
Platform Film Cooling
Mainstream Flow
Rotor-Seal Ejection Cooling
Platform Film Cooling
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Coolant Injection Through Gap
Cross sectional view of the slot ahead of the 1st stage rotor
Coolant enters the plenum through the hollow shaft and exits the slot at 25º to the horizontal.
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Coolant Injection Film Cooling Holes on Hub Platform
Turbine 1st Stage Rotor platform and Flow Schematics Downstream Film Cooling Holes Injection
Coolant injection from discrete Holes
STATOR
ROTOR
Sta
tor
Rotor
u
Passage Vortex
GAP
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Using Pressure Sensitive Paints (PSP) for Film Cooling Effectiveness Measurement
Block diagram of the experimental facility
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
PSP - Calibration
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
P/P
ref
Iref
/I
Fig. 6 Calibration Curve for PSP
Calibration for Temp. range =
22.2oC to 60.1oC
Thermocouple
Vacuum Chamber
Vacuum Pump
Red light emitted from PSP
Green light to excite
PSP
PC
PSP coated test sample
Strobe light
Camera
Heater for Temperature
Control
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Boundary Condition and Sample Results
1st Rotor Inlet Velocity = 35.8 m/s
Inlet Mach Number = 0.1
Inlet Temperature = 46°C
Turbine Stage Operating Conditions
Exit Velocity = 107 m/s
Exit Mach Number = 0.3
Exit Temperature = 43°C
Re = 2.0*105 (axial chord length and exit velocity)
Inlet Total – to – Exit Pressure Ratio = 1.4
Angular Velocity = 2400 rpm , 2550 rpm, 3000 rpm
Stator-Rotor Ejection: Cooling Flow ~ 0.5% to 2% of Mainstream
Platform Film Cooling: Blowing Ratio (M=cVc/∞V∞) ~ 0.5 to 2
Density Ratio (DR=c/∞) = 1 (N2 Injection)
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Results
Measured Film Cooling Effectiveness on the Rotating Platform using PSP – Downstream Discrete Hole Injection
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 0.752400 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.02400 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.252400 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.752400 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 2.02400 rpm
2400 rpmPitchwise Averaged Film Cooling Effectiveness
at 2400rpm – Effect of Blowing ratio
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 2.02400 rpm
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
M=0.75 M=1.00 M=1.25
M=1.50 M=1.75 M=2.00
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 1.5% of mainstream
1.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 0.5% of mainstream
0.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.1
0.2
0.3
M=0.50M=0.75M=1.00M=1.25M=1.50M=1.75M=2.00
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.502400 rpm
M=ρcVc/ ρ∞V∞ ; MFR=(msc/ ms)
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Results
Measured Film Cooling Effectiveness on the Rotating (Reference Point) Platform using PSP – Downstream Discrete Hole Injection
2550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.002550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.502550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.252550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.752550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.002550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 2.002550 rpm
Pitchwise Averaged Film Cooling Effectiveness at 2550rpm – Effect of Blowing ratio
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 2.02400 rpm
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
M=0.75 M=1.00 M=1.25
M=1.50 M=1.75 M=2.00
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 1.5% of mainstream
1.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 0.5% of mainstream
0.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 1.5% of mainstream
1.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 0.5% of mainstream
0.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.1
0.2
0.3
M=0.50M=0.75M=1.00M=1.25M=1.50M=1.75M=2.00
M=ρcVc/ ρ∞V∞ ; MFR=(msc/ ms)
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Results
Measured Film Cooling Effectiveness on the Rotating Platform using PSP – Downstream Discrete Hole Injection
3000 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 2.02400 rpm
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
SS
PS
M=0.75 M=1.00 M=1.25
M=1.50 M=1.75 M=2.00
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 0.752550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.002550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.252550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.502550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 1.752550 rpm
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
M = 2.002550 rpm
Pitchwise Averaged Film Cooling Effectiveness at 3000rpm – Effect of Blowing ratio
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 1.5% of mainstream
1.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 0.5% of mainstream
0.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
Axial Chord, x/CxA
vera
ge
Eff
ect
ive
ne
ss0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
M=0.50M=0.75M=1.00M=1.25M=1.50M=1.75M=2.00
M=ρcVc/ ρ∞V∞ ; MFR=(msc/ ms)
Results
Pitchwise Averaged Film Cooling Effectiveness on the Rotating Platform using PSP – Downstream Film Cooling Hole Injection
Pitchwise Averaged Film Cooling Effectiveness– Effect of Rotor Speed
M=ρcVc/ ρ∞V∞ ; MFR=(msc/ ms)
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
,
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
2400 rpm2550 rpm3000 rpm
Mholes=0.75
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
,0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
2400 rpm2550 rpm3000 rpm
Mholes=1.00
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
,
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
2400 rpm2550 rpm3000 rpm
Mholes=1.25
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
,
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
2400 rpm2550 rpm3000 rpm
Mholes=1.50
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
,
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
2400 rpm2550 rpm3000 rpm
Mholes=2.00
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffect
iven
ess
,
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
2400 rpm2550 rpm3000 rpm
Mholes=1.75
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
,
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
2400 rpm2550 rpm3000 rpm
Mholes=1.50
Results
Measured Film Cooling Effectiveness on the Rotating Platform using PSP – Upstream Stator- Rotor Injection Through Circumferential Slot Only
2400 rpm 2550 rpm 3000 rpm
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Combination of Slot and Hole InjectionsTurbine 1st Stage Rotor platform and Flow Schematics for Combined Upstream Stator- Rotor
Gap Injection and Downstream Film Cooling Holes Injection
Coolant injection through Stator-Rotor Seal
Coolant injection from discrete holes
STATOR
ROTOR
Sta
tor
Rotor
u
Passage Vortex
GAP
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Results
Measured Film Cooling Effectiveness on the Rotating Platform using PSP – Combined Upstream Stator- Rotor Gap Injection and Downstream Film Cooling Hole Injection
2400 rpm
0.600.550.500.450.400.350.300.250.200.150.100.05
2400 rpmGap MFR=1.00%Holes M=0.75
SS
PS
MFR=1.00%
M=0.75
0.600.550.500.450.400.350.300.250.200.150.100.05
2400 rpmGap MFR=1.00%Holes M=1.00
SS
PS
MFR=1.00%
M=1.00
0.600.550.500.450.400.350.300.250.200.150.100.05
2400 rpmGap MFR=1.00%Holes M=1.25
0.600.550.500.450.400.350.300.250.200.150.100.05
2400 rpmGap MFR=1.00%Holes M=1.25
SS
PS
MFR=1.00%
M=1.25
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
MFR=1.00%, M=0.75MFR=1.00%, M=1.00MFR=1.00%, M=1.25
2400rpm
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 1.5% of mainstream
1.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 0.5% of mainstream
0.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
Pitchwise Averaged Film Cooling Effectiveness at 2400rpm – Effect of Blowing ratio
M=ρcVc/ ρ∞V∞ ; MFR=(msc/ ms)
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Results
Measured Film Cooling Effectiveness on the Rotating Platform using PSP – Combined Upstream Stator- Rotor Gap Injection and Downstream Film Cooling Hole Injection
0.600.550.500.450.400.350.300.250.200.150.100.05
3000 rpmGap MFR=1.00%Holes M=1.25
0.600.550.500.450.400.350.300.250.200.150.100.05
3000 rpmGap MFR=1.00%Holes M=1.00
0.600.550.500.450.400.350.300.250.200.150.100.05
3000 rpmGap MFR=1.00%Holes M=0.75
3000 rpm
SS
PS
MFR=1.00%
M=0.75
SS
PS
MFR=1.00%
M=1.00
0.600.550.500.450.400.350.300.250.200.150.100.05
2400 rpmGap MFR=1.00%Holes M=1.25
SS
PS
MFR=1.00%
M=1.25
Axial Chord, x/Cx
Ave
rag
eE
ffe
ctiv
en
ess
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
MFR=1.00%, M=0.75MFR=1.00%, M=1.00MFR=1.00%, M=1.25
3000rpm
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 1.5% of mainstream
1.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.57 0.71 0.86 1.00
Slot Flowm = 0.5% of mainstream
0.5% 20 Sep 2005 | | |
Pitchwise Averaged Film Cooling Effectiveness at 3000rpm – Effect of Blowing ratio
M=ρcVc/ ρ∞V∞ ; MFR=(msc/ ms)
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri