Prevention of Racial Profiling

52
Prevention of Racial Profiling Jim Smith Montana Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association 34 West 6th Ave., Ste. 2E Helena, MT 59601 [email protected] 406.443.5669 406.949-1002 - Cell

description

Prevention of Racial Profiling. Jim Smith Montana Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association 34 West 6th Ave., Ste. 2E Helena, MT 59601 [email protected] 406.443.5669 406.949-1002 - Cell. Funding for Prevention of Racial Profiling. National Highway Traffic Safety - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Prevention of Racial Profiling

Page 1: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Prevention of Racial Profiling

Jim SmithMontana Sheriffs and Peace

Officers Association34 West 6th Ave., Ste. 2E

Helena, MT 59601

[email protected]

406.443.5669

406.949-1002 - Cell

Page 2: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Funding for Prevention of Racial Profiling.

National Highway Traffic SafetyAdministration (NHTSA); Section 1906.

Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)

Montana Sheriffs and Peace Officers

Association (MSPOA)

Page 3: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Montana’s Interest? MDT’s Interest?

• Basic highway traffic safety. Saving lives & preventing injuries.

• Equal protection and treatment for all citizens who travel the Montana highway system.

• Fewer fatal crashes. Fewer serious injuries. Fewer alcohol related crashes.

• More seat belt usage by all who drive.• Especially on Reservations & in Indian

Country.

Page 4: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

NHTSA, SAFETEA-LU, Section 1906.

• Montana’s Grant contains components for:

• Community and communication.• Training and Education.• Surveys and Tracking.• Data collection. Including support for

consistent data collection and reporting by law enforcement.

Page 5: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Examples• Assessment, Course & Treatment

(ACT) for drivers convicted of DUI.

• Driver Education Certification courses on Northern Cheyenne and Crow.

• Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) on Salish-Kootenai,Fort Peck, Fort Belknap & Crow Reservations.

Page 6: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Examples (cont’d)• Software to retrieve crash related

information from Fort Peck, Rocky Boys, Crow and Northern Cheyenne.

• Funding for Montana Highway Patrol (MHP) to develop an integrated solution for tracking and preventing racial profiling incidents in Montana.

Page 7: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Examples (cont’d)• On-going public information and education

programs on the Blackfeet, Fort Peck, Fort Belknap & Rocky Boys Reservations, administered by Banik Communications on behalf of MDT…SOAR (Safe On All Roads) Coordinators.

• Assist Tribes with equipment needs (PBTs, Video Cameras, Speed Trailers, etc.).

Page 8: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Examples (cont’d)• Racial Profiling Prevention Project, thru

MSPOA.

• 2007-2010.

• Community Liaison.

• Outreach, Information, Communication with Tribal Governments, Sheriffs Offices, Police Departments.

Page 9: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Presentation Overview• It begins with beliefs.

• Racial profiling in Montana.

• Highway safety in Indian Country.

• Conclusion.

Page 10: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

It Begins with Beliefs

• Words evoke mental images.

• Mental images evoke emotions.

• Emotions + Experiences form beliefs.

• Examples…english language rich with emotion-laden words.

• Example…”Montana.’

Page 11: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Montana

Page 12: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Montana

Page 13: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Montana

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 14: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Montana

Page 15: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Question• What is the strongest force in the world?

Page 16: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Answer• The power of human belief.

Agree? Disagree?

Discuss.

Page 17: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Question• What is the hardest thing in the world to

change?

Page 18: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Answer• Our own deeply held beliefs.

• Agree? Disagree?

Discuss.

Page 19: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Question• It’s 516 years since 1492. Do you

believe the worst of it--in terms of relations between the races-- is:

• Behind Native people?

• With Native people now?

• In Front of Native people?

Page 20: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Racial Profiling in Montana

• Good resource = Montana Legislative branch home page.

• http://leg.mt.gov/css/default.asp

Page 21: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Racial Profiling Defined• "Racial profiling" means the detention,

official restraint, or other disparate treatment of an individual solely on the basis of the racial or ethnic status of the individual.

• (MCA 44-2-117)

Page 22: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

MCA 44-2-11744-2-117. Racial profiling prohibited --

definitions -- policies -- complaints -- training. (1) A peace officer may not engage in racial profiling. (2) The race or ethnicity of an individual may not be the sole factor in: (a) determining the existence of probable cause to take into custody or arrest an individual; or (b) constituting a particularized suspicion that an offense has been or is being committed in order to justify the detention of an individual or the investigatory stop of a motor vehicle.

Page 23: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

MCA 44-2-117 History• 2001 Session. House Bill 189.

Sponsored by Rep. William Eggers (HD 6, Crow Agency).

Required data collection on traffic stops.

Died on 3rd Reading in the House.

Page 24: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

House Bill 189• HOUSE BILL NO. 189 INTRODUCED BY B.EGGERS, BIXBY,

GALLUS, GALVIN-HALCRO, GUTSCHE, HALLIGAN, HURDLE, JUNEAU, KAUFMANN, KITZENBERG, LENHART, PEASE, SMITH

• A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT REQUIRING THE MONTANA HIGHWAY PATROL, SHERIFF'S OFFICES, AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS TO COLLECT AND REPORT DATA ON ROUTINE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT THAT CAN BE USED WITH REGARD TO THE ISSUE OF RACIAL PROFILING; PROVIDING FOR THE USE OF THE INFORMATION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING; PROVIDING FOR THE VOLUNTARY COLLECTION OF THE DATA BY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE."

Page 25: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

MCA 44-2-117 History• 2003 Session. House Bill 293.

Sponsored by Rep. Frank Smith (SD 16, Poplar)

• Required local and state law enforcement agencies to adopt a policy prohibiting racial profiling.

• Passed. Codified at MCA 44-2-117

Page 26: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

House Bill 293• HOUSE BILL NO. 293 INTRODUCED BY SMITH, BIXBY, COONEY,

ELLINGSON, FRANKLIN, HEDGES, JAYNE, JUNEAU, PEASE, ROUSH, SMALL-EASTMAN, TROPILA, WINDYBOY

• AN ACT PROHIBITING RACIAL PROFILING; REQUIRING LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO ADOPT A DETAILED WRITTEN POLICY THAT CLEARLY DEFINES THE ELEMENTS CONSTITUTING RACIAL PROFILING AND THAT PROHIBITS RACIAL PROFILING; REQUIRING THE POLICY TO INCLUDE A PROCEDURE FOR INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS OF RACIAL PROFILING; REQUIRING A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST A PEACE OFFICER VIOLATING THE POLICY AGAINST RACIAL PROFILING; DEFINING "RACIAL PROFILING"; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

Page 27: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

MCA 44-2-117 History

• 2005 Session. Senate Bill 282. Sponsored by Senator Frank Smith (SD 16, Poplar)

• Required training of law enforcement officers in racial profiling and cultural awarenessAdded a complaint procedure to policy.

Passed. Amended MCA 44-2-117.

Page 28: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Senate Bill 282• SENATE BILL NO. 282 INTRODUCED BY SMITH, CAFERRO,

COCCHIARELLA, COHENOUR, ELLINGSON, GILLAN, HANSEN, KITZENBERG, MANGAN, PEASE, ROUSH, SCHMIDT, SMALL-EASTMAN, TESTER, TOOLE, TROPILA, WILLIAMS, WINDYBOY

• AN ACT REVISING THE LAW PROHIBITING RACIAL PROFILING; REQUIRING WRITTEN POLICIES AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES; REQUIRING TRAINING FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS; AND AMENDING SECTION 44-2-117, MCA.

Page 29: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

MCA 44-2-117 History• 2007 Session. House Bill 781. Sponsored by

Rep. Jonathan Windy Boy (HD 32, Box Elder).

• Required data collection on traffic stops by law enforcement. Requires law enforcement officers to note the race of individuals stopped for traffic violations.

• Passed. Amended MCA 44-2-117

Page 30: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

House Bill 781• HOUSE BILL NO. 781 INTRODUCED BY J.WINDY BOY,

AUGARE, BIXBY, CAMPBELL, CORDIER, JAYNE, JUNEAU, PEASE, SMALL-EASTMAN, SMITH

• AN ACT REQUIRING EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY TO ADOPT A POLICY ON RACE-BASED TRAFFIC STOPS, INCLUDING THE COLLECTION OF DATA ON RACIAL PROFILING IN TRAFFIC STOPS; AMENDING SECTION 44-2-117, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

Page 31: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Bottom Line

Page 32: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Requirements of the Law

• Law enforcement agencies must adopt a policy prohibiting racial profiling--race based traffic stops-- of ethnic & racial minorities (African American, Hispanic, Native American, Asian, Middle Eastern descent).

Page 33: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Requirements of the Law (cont’d)

• provides for periodic reviews by the law enforcement agency and collection of data that determine whether any peace officers of the law enforcement agency have a pattern of stopping members of minority groups for violations of vehicle laws in a number disproportionate to the population of minority groups residing or traveling within the jurisdiction of the law enforcement agency;

Page 34: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Requirements of the Law (cont’d)

• Requires Peace Officers to make an ‘educated guess’ or ‘judgment call ‘ as to the race or ethnicity of anyone stopped for a traffic violation; and to note the assumed race or ethnicity of the person on the Traffic Citation, or through other means.

• Periodic reviews of each officer by his or her supervisor in order to determine whether or not there is a pattern of racial profiling by that officer.

Page 35: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Requirements of the Law (cont’d

• Each law enforcement agency may provide for appropriate counseling and training of any peace officer found to have engaged in race-based traffic stops within 90 days of the review. The course or courses of instruction and the guidelines must stress understanding and respect for racial and cultural differences and development of effective, noncombative methods of carrying out law enforcement duties in a racially and culturally diverse environment.

Page 36: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Requirements of the Law (cont’d

• if the review under subsection (3)(b) reveals a pattern, requires an investigation to determine whether any peace officers of the law enforcement agency routinely stop members of minority groups for violations of vehicle laws as a pretext for investigating other violations of criminal law.

Page 37: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Requirements of the Law (cont’d

• Training of Peace officers in racial profiling and cultural awareness.

• Montana Law Enforcement Academy (MLEA)--four (4) hour block at MLEA Basic Training.

• MLEA willing to bring class to local law enforcement agencies on request.

Page 38: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Requirements of the Law (cont’d

• The policy must include a procedure that the law enforcement agency will use to address written complaints concerning racial profiling. The complaint procedure must require that:(i) all written complaints concerning racial profiling be promptly reviewed; (ii) a person is designated who shall review all written complaints of racial profiling;

Page 39: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Requirements of the Law (complaint--cont’d)

• (iii) the designated person shall, within 10 days of receipt of a written complaint, acknowledge receipt of the complaint in writing; and (iv) after a review is completed, the designated person shall, in writing, inform the person who submitted the written complaint and the head of the agency of the results of the review.

Page 40: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Law Enforcement SurveyApril-May, 2008

• 50 Police Departments (N=50)

• 43 have adopted policy per 44-2-117.

• 43 are collecting data.

• 40 are getting officers trained.

• 41 have ordered new citations (MHP’s E-ticket containing block for race).

Page 41: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Law Enforcement SurveyApril-May, 2008

• 56 Sheriff’s Officers (N=56).

• 48 have adopted policy per 44-2-117.

• 37 are collecting data.

• 48 are getting officers trained.

• 36 have ordered new citations (MHP’s E-ticket containing block for race).

Page 42: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Highway Safety in Indian Country.

• “Native Americans make up 6.2 percent of Montana’s population, yet in 2005 they accounted for 13.5 percent of the State’s fatalities. From 1996 to 2005, Native Americans comprised from 13.5 to 20.1 percent of the state’s fatalities.”

• Source: MDT Comprehensive Highway Safety Plan. Sept. 2006.

Page 43: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

American Indian Fatalities (2003-2007)No Seatbelt

Yes

No

Source: MDT: State Highway Traffic Safety Bureau. Traffic Safety Problem Identification. FY 2008

Page 44: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Navtive American Alcohol vs. No Alcohol Fatalities

Alcohol No Alcohol

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Source: MDT: State Highway Traffic Safety Bureau. Traffic Safety Problem Identification. FY 2008

Page 45: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

County Population (2005) Alcohol/Drug Related Crashes %

Big Horn 13,005 35 19.6%

Fergus 11,539 12 8.0%

Glacier 13,508 66 22.7%

Custer 11,454 6 7.6%

Roosevelt 10,600 45 23.1%

Sanders 10,945 44 18.2%

Jefferson 10,857 30 9.0%

Lake 27,919 109 18.9%

Silver Bow 33,093 34 7.5

Alcohol/Drug Related Crashes Comparison

Counties near/on reservations vs. counties away from reservations with similar populations

Source: MDT: State Highway Traffic Safety Bureau. Traffic Safety Problem Identification. FY 2008

Page 46: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

County Population (2005) Alcohol/Drug Related Crashes %

Blaine 6,668 23 25.0%

Teton 6,283 2 8.5.%

Hill 16,376 26 13.3%

Park 15,791 14 9.6%

Rosebud 9,270 8 7.3%

Carbon 9,755 25 14.0%

Richland 9,112 23 12.5%

Deer Lodge 9,088 11 11.0%

Alcohol/Drug Related Crashes Comparison, continuedCounties near/on reservations vs. counties away from reservations with similar populations

Source: MDT: State Highway Traffic Safety Bureau. Traffic Safety Problem Identification. FY 2008

Page 47: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Precent alcohol/drug related crashes in counties with comparible populations

20%

8%

23%

8%

23%

9%

19%

8%

25%

6%

13%10%

7%

14%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Source: MDT: State Highway Traffic Safety Bureau. Traffic Safety Problem Identification. FY 2008

Page 48: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Source: MDT: State Highway Traffic Safety Bureau. Traffic Safety Problem Identification. FY 2008

Page 49: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Conclusion• Eliminate racial profiling where it is found to

be happening.• Eliminate the perception of racial profiling if it

is not happening.• Through compliance with MCA 44-2-117.

• Why?

Page 50: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Why?

• So that law enforcement and Indian people can work together on other issues:

• Highway Traffic Safety issues…like:

• Primary Seat Belt Law.

• Cross Deputization Agreements.

• Information Sharing.

Page 51: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

Steps? Next Steps ??

Page 52: Prevention  of Racial Profiling

ThanksJim Smith, MSPOA

34 West 6th Ave., Ste. 2E

Helena, MT 59601

[email protected]

406.443.5669

406.949-1002 - Cell

www.mspoa.org