Nike + i pod case

16
Nike + iPod Case presented by Jacob, Martin & Mads

description

A presentation given in response to a Nike + iPod case/old exam paper ( yes, it was rather old)

Transcript of Nike + i pod case

Page 1: Nike + i pod case

Nike + iPod

Case presented by Jacob, Martin & Mads

Page 2: Nike + i pod case

A major player in the clothing and sports equipment industry

Founded in 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports

Nike sponsors a large number of high profile athletes and sports teams around the world

Recognized by the “Just do it” slogan and Swoosh logo

IntroductionNike Apple

Designs and markets consumer electronics, computer software and personal computers

Founded in 1976

Best known for the Macintosh computer, iPod, iPhone and iPad

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 3: Nike + i pod case

The product: The Nike + iPod kit measures and records the distance

and pace of a walk or run, using a small chip embedded in a Nike shoe, which communicates with an iPod and other Apple software

The scene: Intelligent sportswear

The case - Nike+ iPod: Nike-Apple partnership Strategic opportunities/pitfalls Co-branding & decision-making process Adidas-Samsung vs. Nike + iPod

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 4: Nike + i pod case

Question 1Conduct an analysis of the Nike-Apple partnership, including a discussion of the strategic opportunities (and possible pitfalls) this collaboration presents for

each partner?

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 5: Nike + i pod case

Nike & Apple Both market leaders within their industry

Mutual interests

Same type of customers

Brand synergy - both ways Large joined customer base 75% of all runners already listen to music

(Enclosure 2) A Nike crisis affects Apple and vice versa

”The Nike/Apple co-branding ventures is successful because of its undeniable ability to add value to each other’s products, thereby creating something greater than the sum of their parts.” - The Duffy Agency.

 

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 6: Nike + i pod case

SWOT analysis (Nike-Apple)

S

The Apple & Nike brands

Innovative

Market leaders

Large loyal customer base

W

Product requirements

High priced

O

Brand synergy

Distribution channels

Expansion of technology

T

Expansion of technology

Potential harmful influences

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 7: Nike + i pod case

Strategic opportunitiesStrategic alliance

Product alliancePromotional alliance

Product development strategy (Ansoff)

Horizontal diversification strategy

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 8: Nike + i pod case

Question 2Describe and discuss the consumer decision-making process in

relation to purchasing Nike+ shoes and iPod Sport Kit or Sensor. How does the co-branding influence the decision-making process?

Page 9: Nike + i pod case

Consumer decision-making2 types of Nike + iPod buyers:

Dedicated and loyal customers Members of the “Nike community” “Apple-fans”

Contemplating customers

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 10: Nike + i pod case

Consumer buying process

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

“Five-stage model” Kotler, p. 246

Page 11: Nike + i pod case

Co-branding influenceThe best of two strong brands

Brand equity influence

Collective pitfalls

Loyal customer base

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 12: Nike + i pod case

Question 3• Adidas and Samsung have developed a fitness

concept, the “miCoach system” (Enclosures 3 and 4), which bears resemblance to the Nike + iPod system.

• To which extent does the Adidas-Samsung partnership constitute a competitive threat to Nike

and Apple?• How may Nike and Apple respond to this?

Page 13: Nike + i pod case

Industry playersA differentiated oligopoly market

Few major playersNike-Apple, Adidas-Samsung, Garmin, Polar

Nike-Apple the market leader

Adidas-Samsung the market challengerSegmental flank attack on Nike-Apple

PhoneNike-Apple respond counter-offensive

defence strategy (iPhone)

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 14: Nike + i pod case

Adidas-Samsung threat

4 P’sDifference in:

PriceAdidas: $ 300-600 Nike-iPod: $ 180-230

Product No phone vs. Phone Nike shoes exclusively vs. all brands Adidas-Samsung: less music storage

PlaceAdidas-Samsung only sold in Europe

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 15: Nike + i pod case

Adidas-Samsung threatOperating within the same market a

threat

Differences in the 4 P’s softens the threat

Nike-Apple needs to keep an eye on the other market players

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion

Page 16: Nike + i pod case

ConclusionStrategic opportunities and pitfalls

Brand synergyCollective pitfalls

Decision-making processesCo-branding strengthsShared brand equity

Adidas-Samsung threatSame scene, different productNike-Apple response

Introduction Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Conclusion