MOOCs - Connecting and Learning in Open Online Environments: An Autoethnography by Helen Crump
-
Upload
helen-crump -
Category
Education
-
view
115 -
download
1
Transcript of MOOCs - Connecting and Learning in Open Online Environments: An Autoethnography by Helen Crump
MOOCS: connecting and learning in open online environments – an
autoethnography
Irish Learning Technology Association ConferenceMay 29th and 30th, 2014
University College Dublin, Ireland
Helen Crump @crumphelen
#EdTech14
stands for massive, open, online coursebut this does not tell the whole story
Image : Wikimedia Commons (CC NC SA )
Used to describe an open online course offered by the University of Manitoba, Canada in 2008.
At first
MOOCs have gone on to be offered not only by a range of providers across a range of platforms utilising a range of pedagogical approaches.
Designed to try-out the principles of connectivism –highly networked, disaggregated mode of social learning.
Since then
They signal a response to:
o the high cost of higher education o innovations in educational technology o moves towards modernisation and globalised provisiono efforts to open up access
“something larger than a course”.
MOOCs
represent
Veletsianos (2013)
relatively little known about impact on teaching & learning
Research largely the result of institutional surveys, learning analytics and big data, often conducted within the confines of single MOOCs.
Pressing need to gain qualitative understanding from learner’s perspective (Veletsianos, 2013).
Early days
understanding of learning experiences particularly scant
Autoethnography: process and product
seeks to describe and thoughtfully analyse personal experience in order to understand
cultural experience (Ellis and Bochner, 2000).
Combining research and writing
“I come to take up this role through the
combined consequence of agency and serendipity”.
“I was keen to continue my exploration of digital
literacies and online learning”.
Helen Crump: autoethnographer
MOOC provider platform date number enrolled
Program for Online Teaching Certificate #POTcert
Volunteer faculty,
Mira Costa College,
San Diego
Distributed Sept 2012 to May 2013 30 approx.
MOOC MOOC#moocmooc
Hybrid Pedagogy Canvas Network &Distributed
Jan 6th to Jan 12th, 2013 1000+
Open Learning Design Studio’s Learning Design for a 21st Century Curriculum #OLDSMOOC
JISC Distributed Jan 10th to Mar 13th, 2013 2420
Educational Technology and Media #ETMOOC
Alec Couros and ‘Conspirators’
Distributed Jan 13th to Mar 30th, 2013 2000+
eLearning and Digital Cultures #EDCMOOC
Edinburgh University Coursera Jan 28th to Mar 3rd, 2013 42,844
Social Media #CNSoME Instructure Canvas Canvas Network Feb 25th to May 5th, 2013 Not known
Open Course in Technology Enhanced Learning #ocTEL
Association for
Learning TechnologyDistributed April 3rd to June 21st, 2013 1000+
Learn Moodle #learnmoodle Certified Moodle Partners
Moodle Sept 1st to Sept 29th, 2013 8000+
Open Badges: New Currency in Professional Credentials#OpenBadgesMOOC
Blackboard, Mozilla, SRSC and WCET
Blackboard Sept 9th to Oct 20th, 2013, Not known
Exploring Personal Learning Networks #xplrpln
Northwestern University, Illinois.
Distributed Oct 7th to Nov 5th, 2013 128
How To Be An Effective Digital Curator #dcurate
Sam Burrough and Martin Couzins
Curatr Jan 8th to Jan 22nd, 2014 300+
Rhizomatic Learning #rhizo14 Dave Cormier P2PU Jan 14th to Feb 25th, 2014 500 approx.
Reflective Enquiry
This autoethnography considers
the type of learning promoted by MOOCs
and asks how learning is achieved and
by what mechanisms it is facilitated and supported.
Getting started
Reflect on learning and post to the web in a personal blog.
In such environments, learners must have confidence and be competent using the tools in order to mediate the key learning
interactions (Kop, 2011).
“I soon managed to develop a level of comfort with the blogging process and gain confidence from supportive
comments received”.
Learning socially with peers
eLearning and Digital Cultures MOOC
Discussion forums
Alternative peer spaces
“fantastic level of participant-led networked activity initiated in the #EDCMOOC Facebook group.”
“alternative peer spaces became key learning space”.
Developing connectivist proclivities through social networked learning.
“EDCMOOC and ETMOOC presumably afforded me with an experience similar to that conceived of by the early exponents of MOOCs” …highly networked, disaggregated social learning, illustrating the principles of connectivism
Social Media MOOC on the Canvas platform…tutor-led approach, configured with a quiz (about Twitter) that I was unable to pass
Restricts more nuanced understanding of the phenomenon.
xMOOC/cMOOC binary
Lane (2013) identifies task-based (or project-based) MOOCsConole (2013) develops 12 design dimension classification
Negotiating pedagogies & design
• project-based, constructionist approach• group-defined learning design project• choice of a high or low-level learner activity pathways • plethora of online spaces
"the use of unfamiliar technologies such as Cloudworks presented an additional challenge to many participants in the
first week” Cross (2013).
Making connections
“One individual posted a Twitter link to pictures of her recent camping trip. This simple act triggered conversation, which helped spawn the development of a supportive, and on-going, learning network.”
“Locating this individual and realising that we had corresponding aims was as an important support for learning in the complex environment of OLDSMOOC.”
Pondering participation
“guilt at missing out steps”
“That’s the beauty of this type of learning and my preference towards the cMOOCs. I get as much as I want out of them. I don’t have to do every activity if it is irrelevant to my direct needs[…]. I don’t feel guilty about not completing the tasks because there’s no qualification, accreditation or monetary consequence – the true learning is purely self motivation, curiosity and application” (Blunden, 2013).
Dropout & models of participation
Formal completion rates seldom rise above 10% (Jordan, 2013).
‘Dropout’ not clearly defined. (Liyanagunawardena, et al. ,2014)
Models of participation: Kizilcec et al., 2013; Hill, 2013 and Milligan et al., 2013.
Descriptors closely bound to engagement within defined pathways of individual MOOCs, and do not fully capture the experience.
Challenging tidy categorisation
#rhizo14 – “I did not engage with prescribed activities beyond week two, but I continue to interact in the Facebook group that supports ongoing community”.
#ETMOOC – “I participated with ‘muted activity’ at the time, but I have returned to the archive on a number of occasions”.
“It is the combination of personal learning objectives and the freedom to roam, to ‘choose your own path’ […] that drives my
participation.”
Accords with the ideas of rhizomatic learning (Cormier, 2011).
Pondering the metrics of success
Traditionally, success is determined by the institution with the award of a certificate of achievement, but now
As learners can freely engage in these environments without penalty, it begs the question ‘what constitutes learning success’.
the learner
Success, in my mind
Closely adheres to the descriptor of active participant that Milligan et al. (2013) identify as conferring success within connectivist environments.
Not certificates or badges
“Success is the realisation of learning pertinent to my goals, derived through active blogging, social learning with peers and the development of ongoing network connections”.
MOOC Participation and success
Program for Online Teaching Certificate #POTcert Active – entire course
Awarded Certificate of Completion
MOOC MOOC#moocmooc
Active – part course
Open Learning Design Studio’s Learning Design for a 21st Century Curriculum#OLDSMOOC
Active – entire course
Awarded full set of badges
Educational Technology and Media #ETMOOC Active/passive – entire course – returned to course archive
afterwards
eLearning and Digital Cultures #EDCMOOC Active – entire course
Awarded Certificate of Completion
Social Media #CNSoME Passive – disengaged in week 2
Open Course in Technology Enhanced Learning #ocTEL Active – part course
Learn Moodle #learnmoodle Passive – entire course
Open Badges: New Currency in Professional Credentials#OpenBadgesMOOC
Passive – part course
Exploring Personal Learning Networks #xplrpln Active – entire course
How To Be An Effective Digital Curator #dcurate Active (but did not blog) – entire course
Awarded badge of completion
Rhizomatic Learning #rhizo14 Active – part course – continued interaction in Facebook
community group
Active = realisation of learning goals, derived through active blogging, social networked learning with peers and the development of ongoing network connections.Passive = realisation of learning goals, derived through engagement with course readings and some activities, mostly within course platform.
Key Themes
Social networked learning as guiding force
The role of connection in achieving learning
Self-efficacy as a product of experience
Self-direction/determination increases overtime
Social networked learning
as guiding force
Closely aligned with ethos that defines connectivist MOOCs (McGill, 2013).
focus on learner-centred and process driven learning
supports seemingly borderless learning
promotes active engagement, peer learning, knowledge sharing, collaboration & personalised learning
Role of connection in achieving learning
The overall ability to connect proves crucial in this study.
The achievement of connection is central to connectivist ideas.
Applied “connection as the unit of analysis in learning” across her learning landscape (Siemens, 2012, 30) .
Self-efficacy as a product of experience
Experience
Confidence
Connection
Learning
Supported by the work of Kop et al. (2011) and Milligan et al. (2013).
Self-direction/determination
increasing overtime
Development of a unique pathway across range of MOOCs.
Increasingly tailored to meet personal learning objectives.
Increasingly less concerned with course completion and the guilt often associated with the notion of dropout
Expression of self-determined learning, where personal experience and context is key, and the learner is “the major agent in their own learning” (Hase& Kenyon, 2007, p. 112).
Conclusions
Be scaled and augmented with methods designed to discover enhanced understanding of learners’ goals and patterns of their participation across a series of MOOCs over time.
Difficult to claim generalised conclusions from this study.
Research must now…
To ‘open up conversation’
How relevant is the type of learning outlined here in the context higher education?
modernising higher education
What role will higher education play in ensuring that learners develop social networked learning skills for lifelong learning in the future?
Thank You
Helen Crump @crumphelen
#EdTech14