MGMT-I UNIT 3

download MGMT-I UNIT 3

of 36

Transcript of MGMT-I UNIT 3

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    1/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-1

    Organizational Structure And Design

    Organization structurethe pattern ofjobs and groups of jobs in an

    organization.

    It is an important cause of individual andgroup behavior.

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    2/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-2

    The Concept of Organization Structure

    Structure as an

    influence on

    behavior

    Structure as

    recurring activities

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    3/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-3

    Organization designmanagement

    decisions and actions that result in a

    specific organization structure.

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    4/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-4

    Division of Labor:

    Departmentalization:

    Span of Control:

    High Low

    Homogeneous Heterogeneous

    ManyFew

    Authority:LowHigh

    Specialization

    Basis

    Number

    Delegation

    The Four Key Design Decisions

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    5/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-5

    Division of Labor

    Div is ion of labo r concerns the extentto which jobs are specialized

    It is the process of dividing work into

    relatively specialized jobs to achieve

    advantages of specialization

    D f L b O Th

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    6/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-6Division of Labor Occurs in ThreeDifferent Ways:

    1. Personal specialties e.g., accountants, software engineers, graphic

    designers, scientists, etc.

    2. Natural sequence of work e.g., dividing work in a manufacturing plant into

    fabricating and assembly (horizontal specialization)

    3. Vertical plane

    e.g., hierarchy of authority from lowest-level manager

    to highest-level manager

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    7/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-7

    Delegation of Authority

    Managers decide how much authorityshould be delegated to each job and to

    each jobholder

    Delegat ion o f au thor i ty process of

    distributing authority downward in an

    organization

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    8/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-8

    Reasons to Decentralize Authority

    1. Relatively high delegation of authorityencourages the development of professional

    managers

    2. High delegation of authority can lead to acompetitive climate within the organization

    3. Managers who have relatively high authority

    can exercise more autonomy, and thus satisfy

    their desires to participate in problem solving

    16 9

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    9/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-9

    Reasons to Centralize Authority (1 of 2)

    1. Managers must be trained to make thedecisions that go with delegated authority

    2. Many managers are accustomed to makingdecisions and resist delegating authority totheir subordinates

    16 10

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    10/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-10

    Reasons to Centralize Authority (2 of 2)

    3. Administrative costs are incurred because newcontrol systems must be developed to providetop management with information about the

    effects of subordinates decisions

    4. Decentralization means duplication of

    functions

    16 11

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    11/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-11

    Delegation Decision Guidelines(1 of 2)

    How routine and straightforward are the jobs orunits required decisions?

    The authority for routine decisions can becentralized

    Are individuals competent to make the decision?

    Even if the decision is non-routine, if the localmanager is not capable, then the decision should be

    centralized

    Delegation of authority can differ among individualsdepending upon each ones ability to make the

    decision

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    12/36

    16 13

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    13/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-13

    Departmentalizationprocess in

    which an organization is

    structurally divided by combiningjobs in departments according to

    some shared characteristic or

    basis.

    16-14

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    14/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16-14

    Functional Geographic

    Product Customer

    Departmentalization Bases

    16-15

    Departmental Bases:

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    15/36McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16 15Departmental Bases:

    Functional Departmentalization

    Jobs are combined according to the functionsof the organization

    The principal advantage is efficiency

    By having departments of specialists,management creates efficient units

    A major disadvantage is that organizational

    goals may be sacrificed in favor of

    departmental goals

    16-16

    Departmental Bases:

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    16/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    16 16Departmental Bases:

    Geographic Departmentalization

    Establish groups according to geographicarea

    The logic is that all activities in a given

    region should be assigned to a manager Advantageous in large organizations

    because physical separation of activities

    makes centralized coordination difficult Provides a training ground for managerial

    personnel

    16-17

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    17/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Northeast Midwest Southeast Pacific

    OBMCompany

    Southwest

    Geographic Departmentalization Structure

    16-18

    Departmental Bases:

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    18/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Departmental Bases:

    Product Departmentalization

    All jobs associated with producing and selling aproduct or product line will be placed under thedirection of one manager

    Product becomes the preferred basis as a firmgrows by increasing the number of products itmarkets

    Concentrating authority, responsibility, andaccountability in a specific product departmentallows top management to coordinate actions

    16-19

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    19/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    OBM Company

    Small

    HouseholdAppliances

    Large

    HouseholdAppliances

    CommercialAppliances

    Building

    Materials andProducts

    Lawn and

    GardenProducts

    AutomotiveProducts

    Product Departmentalization Structure

    16-20

    Departmental Bases:

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    20/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Departmental Bases:

    Customer Departmentalization

    The importance of customer satisfaction hasstimulated firms to search for creative ways to

    serve people better

    Organizations with customer-based departments

    are better able to satisfy customer-identified

    needs than organizations that base departments

    on non-customer factors

    16-21

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    21/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    RetailStores

    Mail Order On-LineSales

    GovernmentContracts

    OBMCompany

    InstitutionalSales

    Customer Departmentalization Structure

    16-22

    S f C l

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    22/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Span of Control (1 of 2)

    Number of individuals who report to aspecific manager

    Narrow span

    Wide span

    The frequency and intensity of actual

    relationships is the critical considerationin determining the managers span ofcontrol

    16-23

    Di i f S

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    23/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Dimensions of Structure

    Formalization the extent to which expectationsregarding the means and ends of work are

    specified, written, and enforced

    Centralization the location of decision-makingauthority in the hierarchy

    Complexity the direct outgrowth of dividing

    work and creating departments

    16-24

    Comparison of Mechanistic and Organic

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    24/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Comparison of Mechanistic and OrganicStructures (1 of 3)

    Process Mechanistic Structure Organic Structure

    1. Leadership Includes no perceived

    confidence and trust between

    superiors and subordinates.

    Includes perceived confidence

    and trust between superiors

    and subordinates.

    2. Motivation Taps only physical, security,

    and economic motives,

    through use of fear and

    sanctions.

    Taps a full range of motives

    through participatory methods.

    3. Communication Information flows downwardand tends to be distorted,

    inaccurate, and viewed with

    suspicion by subordinates.

    Information flows freely:upward, downward, and

    laterally. The information is

    accurate and undistorted.

    16-25

    Comparison of Mechanistic and Organic

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    25/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved

    Comparison of Mechanistic and OrganicStructures (2 of 3)

    Process Mechanistic Structure Organic Structure

    4. Interaction Closed and restricted.

    Subordinates have little effect

    on departmental goals,

    methods, and activities.

    Open and extensive. Both

    superiors and subordinates are

    able to affect departmental

    goals, methods, and activities.

    5. Decision Relatively centralized.

    Occurs only at the top of the

    organization.

    Relatively decentralized.

    Occurs at all levels through

    group processes.

    6. Goal setting Located at the top of the

    organization, discouraging

    group participation.

    Encourages group

    participation in setting high,

    realistic objectives.

    16-26

    Comparison of Mechanistic and Organic

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    26/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc All rights reserved

    Comparison of Mechanistic and OrganicStructures (3 of 3)

    Process Mechanistic Structure Organic Structure

    7. Control Centralized. Emphasizes

    fixing blame for mistakes.

    Dispersed throughout the

    organization. Emphasizes

    self-control and problem

    solving.

    8. Performance

    goals

    Low and passively sought

    by managers, who make no

    commitment to developing

    the organizations humanresources.

    High and actively sought by

    superiors, who recognize the

    need for full commitment to

    developing, through training,the organizations human

    resources.

    16-27

    Organization Design Models:

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    27/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc All rights reserved

    g g

    The Matrix Model

    Matr ix organizat ion

    attempts to maximizethe strengths and minimize the weaknesses

    of both the functional and product bases

    Superimpose a horizontal structure of

    authority, influence, and communication on

    the vertical structure

    Facilitates the utilization of highly specialized

    staff and equipment

    16-28

    E l f th M t i O i ti M d l

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    28/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc All rights reserved

    Project or product A

    Project or product B

    Project or product C

    Project or product D

    Project or product E

    Manufacturing Marketing Engineering FinanceFunctions

    Projects, products

    Example of the Matrix Organization Model

    16-29

    Advantages of Matrix Organization

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    29/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc All rights reserved

    Advantages of Matrix Organization

    Efficient use of resources Flexibility in conditions of change and uncertainty

    Technical excellence

    Freeing top management for long-range planning

    Improving motivation and commitment

    Providing opportunities for personaldevelopment

    16-30

    Evolutionary Steps to the Matrix Model

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    30/36

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc All rights reserved

    Task Force

    Teams

    Product

    Managers

    Product

    Management Depts.

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    Evolutionary Steps to the Matrix Model

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    31/36

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    32/36

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    33/36

    16-34

    Virtual Organizations

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    34/36

    McGraw Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw Hill Companies Inc All rights reserved

    Virtual Organizations

    Virtual o rgan izat ion a collection ofgeographically distributed, functionally

    and/or culturally diverse aggregations of

    individuals that is linked by electronicforms of communication

    Assembled and disassembled accordingto needs

    16-35

    Virtual Organizations:C

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    35/36

    McGraw Hill/Irwin 2005 The McGraw Hill Companies Inc All rights reserved

    gConsequences

    Increase in overall communication and messages Relationships are tenuous

    Continual surety of roles, tasks, and assignments

    Caution needed in managing feedback,discussion, performance review, and reward

    systems

    Greater equity of participation

    16-36

    Boundaryless Organizations

  • 7/30/2019 MGMT-I UNIT 3

    36/36

    M G Hill/I i 2005 Th M G Hill C i I All i ht d

    Boundaryless Organizations

    Organizations in which: the hierarchy and chain of command are

    minimized

    rigidly structured departments areeliminated

    Implemented to reduce barriers betweenpeople and constituencies