mfdc2d

5
2. Preliminaries for Dierentiation in Stochas- tic Environments In ordinary calculus df  = f x dx, where f x  is the derivative of  f (x) w.r.t  x. Or- dinary dierential equations (ODE) are based on the rules of the usual dierentiation rules. 1 The question is: How dierentiati on can be extended to stochastic analysis? Although, as we will see, derivative does not (usually) exist in stochastic analysis, we get a reasonabl e denit ion for dierential equa- tion for stochastic variables. These are called stochastic dierential equations (SDE) 2

Transcript of mfdc2d

7/27/2019 mfdc2d

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 1/5

2. Preliminaries for Differentiation in Stochas-

tic Environments

In ordinary calculus

df   = f xdx,

where f x  is the derivative of  f (x) w.r.t x. Or-dinary differential equations (ODE) are based

on the rules of the usual differentiation rules.

1

The question is: How differentiation can be

extended to stochastic analysis?

Although, as we will see, derivative does not

(usually) exist in stochastic analysis, we get

a reasonable definition for differential equa-

tion for stochastic variables. These are calledstochastic differential equations (SDE)

2

7/27/2019 mfdc2d

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 2/5

With SDEs we can analyze the dynamics of 

a stochastic process,   S t, such that

dS t  = a(S t, t) dt + b(S t, t) dW t,(1)

where dW t is an unpredictable  innovation term

during the infinitesimal interval  dt.

The terms   a(S t, t) and   b(S t, t) represent  drift 

and   diffusion   (amount of randomness), re-

spectively.

Thus the change has the representation

change = mean change + unpredictable innovation.

3

Let us next consider a discrete approximation

of (1) in time interval [0, T ] with   t0   = 0   <

t1 < · · · < tn = T .

Assume further that ∆t   =   tk  − tk−1   =   T /n,

and for simplicity that a(S t, t) ≡ a and b(S t, t) =

b   are constants.

Then the changes of (1) can be approxi-

mated as

∆S k  = a∆t + b∆W k,(2)

where ∆S k   =  S tk − S tk−1

  and ∆W k   =  W tk −

W tk−1.

Given   S 0, we get a ”solution” for (2) as

S t = S 0 + at + b

nk=1

∆W k.(3)

4

7/27/2019 mfdc2d

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 3/5

In order to model  S t   as a stochastic process,

we must impose some restrictions to the ran-

dom innovations ∆W k.

First, technically it is reasonable to assume

that E[∆W k] = 0 for all   k   and for all   n. De-

note the variances as

V k  = E[∆W k]2,

and

V   =n

k=1

V k.

To obtain a reasonable model for stock price

dynamics, we introduce the following assump-

tions

5

Assumption 1: Positive lower bound for volatil-

ity

V > A1 > 0,

where   A1   is independent of   n.

Assumption 2: Finite upper bound

V < A2 < ∞,

where   A2   is independent of   n.

Assumption 3: Uncertainty is not concen-

trated

V k

V max > A3,   0 < A3 < 1,

with   A3   independent of   n, and

V max = maxk

V k, k  = 1, . . . , n .

This assumption guarantees that whenever

markets are open there is at least some volatil-ity.

6

7/27/2019 mfdc2d

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 4/5

Proposition 2.1: (Merton 1990) Under assumptions

1, 2, and 3, the variance of ∆W k   is

E [∆W k]2 = σ2k h,

where   h = ∆t =  T /n, and   σk   is a finite constant that

may depend on information at time   tk−1.

7

Although the differential ∆W k   is reasonable,

there is no such concept like derivative of  W t!

Another implication of the model is that the

sample path of   W t   becomes increasingly ir-

regular. That is, although the sample path

is continuous, it is nowhere differentiable!

The first claim is easily seen, because if there

existed a stochastic process   At   such that

W t+h − W t

h

q .m .→   At

then

limh→0

E

W t+h − W t

h  − At

2

= 0.

8

7/27/2019 mfdc2d

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 5/5

But then (assume   h > 0, and that

E[∆W t+h]2 = h, i.e.,   σt  = 1)

E

∆W t+h

h  −A(t)

2

= E

∆W t+h

h

2

− 2E (∆W t+hAt) + E[At]2.

Now

∆W t+hAt

 =  E 

AtEt(∆W t+h)

 = 0,

because

Et[∆W t+h] = E[W t+h] = 0

(unpredictable).

However

E∆W t+h

h

2

=  h

h2

  = 1

h

 → ∞   as   h → 0.

thus no limit exist, and no derivative can be

defined!

9

Nevertheless, as the differential concept is

reasonable and useful, the concept must be

defined via (stochastic) integral, which we’ll

deal with later.

10