mfdc2d
-
Upload
tu-shirota -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of mfdc2d
7/27/2019 mfdc2d
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 1/5
2. Preliminaries for Differentiation in Stochas-
tic Environments
In ordinary calculus
df = f xdx,
where f x is the derivative of f (x) w.r.t x. Or-dinary differential equations (ODE) are based
on the rules of the usual differentiation rules.
1
The question is: How differentiation can be
extended to stochastic analysis?
Although, as we will see, derivative does not
(usually) exist in stochastic analysis, we get
a reasonable definition for differential equa-
tion for stochastic variables. These are calledstochastic differential equations (SDE)
2
7/27/2019 mfdc2d
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 2/5
With SDEs we can analyze the dynamics of
a stochastic process, S t, such that
dS t = a(S t, t) dt + b(S t, t) dW t,(1)
where dW t is an unpredictable innovation term
during the infinitesimal interval dt.
The terms a(S t, t) and b(S t, t) represent drift
and diffusion (amount of randomness), re-
spectively.
Thus the change has the representation
change = mean change + unpredictable innovation.
3
Let us next consider a discrete approximation
of (1) in time interval [0, T ] with t0 = 0 <
t1 < · · · < tn = T .
Assume further that ∆t = tk − tk−1 = T /n,
and for simplicity that a(S t, t) ≡ a and b(S t, t) =
b are constants.
Then the changes of (1) can be approxi-
mated as
∆S k = a∆t + b∆W k,(2)
where ∆S k = S tk − S tk−1
and ∆W k = W tk −
W tk−1.
Given S 0, we get a ”solution” for (2) as
S t = S 0 + at + b
nk=1
∆W k.(3)
4
7/27/2019 mfdc2d
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 3/5
In order to model S t as a stochastic process,
we must impose some restrictions to the ran-
dom innovations ∆W k.
First, technically it is reasonable to assume
that E[∆W k] = 0 for all k and for all n. De-
note the variances as
V k = E[∆W k]2,
and
V =n
k=1
V k.
To obtain a reasonable model for stock price
dynamics, we introduce the following assump-
tions
5
Assumption 1: Positive lower bound for volatil-
ity
V > A1 > 0,
where A1 is independent of n.
Assumption 2: Finite upper bound
V < A2 < ∞,
where A2 is independent of n.
Assumption 3: Uncertainty is not concen-
trated
V k
V max > A3, 0 < A3 < 1,
with A3 independent of n, and
V max = maxk
V k, k = 1, . . . , n .
This assumption guarantees that whenever
markets are open there is at least some volatil-ity.
6
7/27/2019 mfdc2d
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 4/5
Proposition 2.1: (Merton 1990) Under assumptions
1, 2, and 3, the variance of ∆W k is
E [∆W k]2 = σ2k h,
where h = ∆t = T /n, and σk is a finite constant that
may depend on information at time tk−1.
7
Although the differential ∆W k is reasonable,
there is no such concept like derivative of W t!
Another implication of the model is that the
sample path of W t becomes increasingly ir-
regular. That is, although the sample path
is continuous, it is nowhere differentiable!
The first claim is easily seen, because if there
existed a stochastic process At such that
W t+h − W t
h
q .m .→ At
then
limh→0
E
W t+h − W t
h − At
2
= 0.
8
7/27/2019 mfdc2d
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mfdc2d 5/5
But then (assume h > 0, and that
E[∆W t+h]2 = h, i.e., σt = 1)
E
∆W t+h
h −A(t)
2
= E
∆W t+h
h
2
− 2E (∆W t+hAt) + E[At]2.
Now
E
∆W t+hAt
= E
AtEt(∆W t+h)
= 0,
because
Et[∆W t+h] = E[W t+h] = 0
(unpredictable).
However
E∆W t+h
h
2
= h
h2
= 1
h
→ ∞ as h → 0.
thus no limit exist, and no derivative can be
defined!
9
Nevertheless, as the differential concept is
reasonable and useful, the concept must be
defined via (stochastic) integral, which we’ll
deal with later.
10