Hornsey Parish Church 60/60 Community Engagement Report Executive Summary...
Transcript of Hornsey Parish Church 60/60 Community Engagement Report Executive Summary...
Naomi Ferguson, Victoria Maynard
Phase 2, 06.12.2017
Hornsey Parish Church 60/60
Community Engagement Report
Executive Summary
and Detailed Findings
Contents
pages
Executive summary 3-9
Strategy 4-5
Summary of findings :
Phase 1 6-7
Phase 2 8-9
Detailed Findings Phase 2 10-26
Stage 01: Project focus and name 11-17
Stage 02: Prioritizing and connecting spaces 18-21
Stage 03: Street fronts 22-25
Evaluation of proposals 26
Images 27
Detailed findings from phase 1 can be found at:
http://hornseyparishchurch.org/news-events/development-project/
Note: this report is optimized for screen viewing
and projection. If you need to print a hard copy,
we recommend it be double sided and in colour.
Hornsey Parish Church 60/60
Community Engagement
1. Executive summary
Strategy
The methods used were:
PHASE 1 Sept. 2017
• focus group discussions and structured interviews with regular users
• An open meeting for local residents and businesses with facililtated
feedback posters
• feedback posters for congregation members to use after services
PHASE 2 Oct. 2017
• A World Café style design workshop for regular users
PHASE 3 Nov. 2017 – Jan. 2018
• A public exhibition of preliminary proposals with facilitated feedback
posters
ALL PHASES
• Leaflets and posters about the project and events, coverage on the
existing HPC website, a dedicated project newsletter, coverage in the
parish newsletter and on social media, coverage in the local press.
The questions posed sought to :
PHASE 1 - understand:
• current users’ impressions of the site as it is
• their initial ideas of how it could be improved,
• ideas for new activities or facilities at Hornsey Parish Church
• Stakeholders’ initial hopes for and concerns about the project
PHASE 2
• draw out detailed information about how current users imagined the
spaces in the scheme should function and their relationships to each
other and to the street fronts
• explore their ideas of which spaces to prioritise and whether HPC
should focus on supporting a particular group/groups in the community
• introduce them to some of the trade-offs that arise in reconciling the
brief requirements and accompany them in envisaging change
PHASE 3
• what the community thought about the proposals
Why engage stakeholders? And how?
4
The purpose of the community engagement at Hornsey Parish Church (“HPC”) is to:
1. explain the need for the project “Hornsey Parish Church 60/60” and generate excitement about the opportunities it offers.
2. raise awareness of current and future community resources at HPC.
3. listen to the church community and local people, and demonstrate that their voices are welcome.
4. create the best design solution to meet the needs of the different stakeholders.
5. provide reassurance and allay fears.
6. meet the requirements of Haringey Council
Interest
Who was consulted?In
flu
en
ceH
igh
Low
HighLow
Congregation (detached)
Congregation (regulars)
• Emails, phone calls,
presentations and
meetings
Local schools• Project newsletters
• open meeting
Hall users
Children and
youth groups
PCC/ Standing Com.
• Focus groups / interviews
• Workshop
• Project newsletters
• Information and feedback
posters following church
services
• Focus groups
• Workshop
• Project newsletters
• Project newsletters
• Letters
• Meetings as appropriate
Haringey Council /
Local councillors
Archdeacon’s Office
Neighbours, businesses,
Residents Associations
St Mary’s Primary
Hornsey Historical Society
Neighbouring churches
Congregation (events)
Monument Conservationists
GLA
All stakeholders:• Exhibition of proposals
Coverage of project in/on:
• HPC web page
• Social media
• Parish newsletters
• Local press
...and how?
5
Summary Findings phase 1
6
The phase 1 activities reached a wide cross-section of current users
- congregation members and hirers of the community spaces - as
well as local residents, local businesses and the ward councillors, in
an intense series of activities on different days and of different
formats that were held between the 20th and 30th of September
2017. Respondents were overwhelmingly positive about the
opportunities presented by HPC 60/60, while they also recorded
their affection for many features of the existing site and facilities.
01: Comments about the existing siteWhat is it important to retain?
• The church building and chapels were shown to be highly valued
among all groups, with participants commenting on their beauty,
historical memory and the uplifting, peaceful atmosphere in
them all. The chapels were seen to complement the main body
of the church, offering spaces of different sizes more suitable for
smaller group worship, and higher comfort levels.
• The church room is heavily used by the congregation and is well-
loved as a space for social activities and hospitality. Its size,
location, kitchen facilities , warmth, and the beauty of the
Stationers’ window were noted as key features. The dance studio
is described as beautiful. The Garden is also appreciated,
although noted to be inaccessible and underused.
• Many features of the site were also highly valued by hirers:
- the location of HPC
- having on-site parking
- the size and robustness of the hall
- the accessibility of the hall for wheelchair users
-having a range of spaces of different sizes
-the dance studio- sprung floor, good size, good light
- affordable rents
Why make changes?
There was widespread consensus that HPC 60/60 represented an
exciting opportunity for HPC to make some very necessary
improvements. Specific drivers for change included:
• Building entrances
- trip hazards (steps / narrow staircases) and inaccessible to
wheelchair users (except for hall)
- no buffer zone between hall entrance and the car park
(dangerous for children)
- lack of control over people entering the site and buildings
• Need for useful lobby spaces in all the buildings
- waiting spaces, to manage flows in and out,
- for display
- buggy stores
• circulation across the site:
-Labyrinthine, difficult to navigate, lack of signage
-Spaces are disconnected, hence the hall does not ‘feel’ part of
the church
- inaccessible for wheelchairs and trolleys
- circulation between buildings is all external
• Insufficient storage in all areas
• Toilets and hall kitchen old, small, do not provide all the required
facilities (e.g. baby changing facilities, disabled access)
• Poor control of temperature and natural light throughout
• Auxiliary spaces in the church - vestry too small, new spaces
needed (private meeting rooms)
• The exterior of the site is uninviting, poorly lit and does not
express either the beauty of the interior or give an indication of
the activities happening on site.
Summary Findings phase 1
7
02: Local needsLocal councillors and residents highlighted the potential for HPC to
become a community hub bringing people together across this
culturally and socially diverse area. The project was also seen as an
opportunity to address social problems caused by a lack of
affordable housing and cuts in the public provision of services
locally, especially for the elderly and young people.
• Current users commented that they did not feel well-informed on
local needs and that HPC should consult with external
community organisations to find out more.
• Among users and local residents, the groups most commented on
were
- teenagers / youth
- The homeless / precariously housed / first time buyers
- The elderly, especially those who are socially isolated
• Young children were also suggested although there were differing
opinions as to whether this group was already well-served locally.
• Other groups suggested included: local community organisations,
mental health and dementia sufferers, ethnic minorities
• The idea of including residential units was well received, both in
response to local need and as a logical way to finance the
project.
• Suggestions about future revenue sources included:
- Concert venue / exhibition spaces for local musicians and
artisans
- Improving the hall’s usefulness as a hireable party venue
- Potential of the site as a good wedding venue
• Creating a community hub: leisure, music and social activities for
all ages; a drop-in café
03: Hopes and concerns Participants were very positive about the potential of the project,
with hopes far outweighing concerns for both phases of the project.
Concerns about the construction phase included:
• Noise
• Disruption of activities on site and for residents
• Site traffic dangers
• Parking problems
Hopes for construction:
• Quick and well-managed
• Limited disruption
Concerns about the outcome of the project:
• Loss of community spaces
• Rents becoming unaffordable
• Greater demand for parking
Hopes for the project:
• That it will result in a more attractive and inviting site and buildings
• That the facilities will be better suited to the activities on site
• That HPC can become a community hub, reaching more people in
the community
• Improvements in accessibility, lighting and signage throughout
• The chance for an attractive, modern, eco building in keeping with
the architecture of the church
• A chance to provide affordable housing
Summary Findings phase 2
8
Phase 2 consisted of a design workshop for current users run twice
on the 18th October 2017. Presented as an exercise in “blue sky
thinking”, participants took the opportunity to explore how they
currently use the site and how it could be re-imagined. Themes of
discussion that arose included how to make the different spaces on
site feel more connected; how to make the site more attractive and
welcoming; which of the activities should be expressed on the street
fronts and what image to convey; and how to make the facilities
relevant to the local community.
01: How would you make HPC unique?Who are you building for and what would you provide for them?
Having a target demographic for the facilities at HPC could help to
define more precisely what spaces are needed and with what
characteristics, to clarify a plan for revenue streams and to define a
“unique selling point”. Suggestions from the phase 2 activities
included:
• Having facilities for children, young people and the elderly on site
and fostering shared activities between the different age groups
• Renewing the Mission focus on children and young people with
the provision of a children’s sacred space, as well as a drop-in
centre with sofas, homework space and games
• Responding to the large number of creative professionals in the
local community by enhancing the church so that it can be used
as a performance space and also providing purpose-built
performance space in the community hall.
02a: Priority spacesWhat spaces to include?
Participants prioritized the following spaces, in this order:
1. a large community hall
2. 1 or 2 secondary halls/large rooms for church and community use
3. parish office
4. 1 or 2 meeting rooms for church use and (once) commercial use
5. A coffee point / lobby extension at the southern end of the
church to create a welcoming social space visible from the
exterior, perhaps serving additionally as a crèche or a dining space
for church lunches.
6. commercial units –for office or nursery tenants, retail or café
premises, a hot-desking hub or music rehearsal/recording rooms
7. Kitchens. kitchen facilities for the church: the importance of
having a dedicated kitchen for church use was identified to enable
church events, lunches and refreshments to take place when the
hall is hired out. Many schemes also included a catering kitchen
for the hall, to be hired out with it for events.
8. Specialized facilities:
• Children’s sacred space
• Drop-in centres for children / mental health sufferers
• Day-centre for elderly with dementia
• An informal, more accessible worship space
• Workshop for training young people in manual skills
• Music rehearsal/recording rooms for community use
Summary Findings phase 2
9
02b: How to connect the spaces
• a central courtyard was a key feature of most of the schemes, with
the idea that it could be a peaceful space representing the
worshipping heart of the site and bringing together the users of the
site; enabling visual connections between the buildings to make
them appear connected, more inviting and the site more navigable.
• creating new church entrances was also a common feature of the
proposals: in the eastern wall – to bring activity to the central
courtyard after services and to increase the connection of the
church and community spaces; in the western wall – to add
functionality for church services and performances.
03: Street fronts
How to front Park Road was a key theme. Ideas included:
• creating a ‘busy’ facade by locating the hall and commercial
premises there . It was also considered useful for the commercial
premises (and in some cases the hall) to have direct, independent
access from Park Rd;
• Protecting the rest of the site from the noise of the road by locating
the more noise-tolerant functions there (hall, housing, commercial
/office premises);
• having a direct entrance into the central courtyard off Park Rd
• having sightlines to the church, and into the central courtyard from
Park Rd;
• locating church functions such as the parish office or a secondary,
more informal/social worship space close to Park Road to make the
church activity more visible.
Hornsey Parish Church
Community Engagement Phase 2
Detailed findings
This section details findings from the following events and activities:
Workshop for current users (lunchtime and evening sessions) 18-10-17
11
Participants were invited to
participate in a game in groups to
design a proposal for HPC 60/60. Each
group was given three instruction
cards, a blank site plan and a set of
cardboard boxes to represent the
different spaces they could choose to
include in their scheme. The church
had to be retained in its current
position but the rest was up to them.
Design workshops for current users
12
Stage 01: Project focus + name
13
project
TITLE :Meeting Point Lunch
target USER
GROUP(S) :
No single target group, retain
current focus of HPC
key
ACTIVITIES:
As at present
Key points:
• Making church activities visible
on the outside
• Connecting and unifying the
different spaces and activities on
the site
• Drawing people in and making
them feel loved
Stage 01: Project focus + name
14
project
TITLE :Open Faith
target USER
GROUP(S) :
No single target group
key
ACTIVITIES:
Performance – Dance, music
and theatre
Key points:
• Making the most of key location
on the corner of Park Road
• Reaching out with a new
entrance on Park Rd
• Cloister
• State of the art performance
space
• Private garden at rear
• Additional church office space
Stage 01: Project focus + name
project
TITLE :Let’s Front Park Road
target USER
GROUP(S) :
Elderly and Children
key
ACTIVITIES:
Focus on securing long-term
stable tenants on the Park
Road frontage
15
Key points:
• Bring church presence to the
most prominent part of site:
Park Road – busy road with busy
bus route, hence church office +
large hall on corner of Park Rd
and Cranley Gdns
• Create shared spaces between
nursery + day centre for elderly
people with memory loss
• Key anchor tenants x 2 –
essential for financial stability,
eg. accountants; nursery
• Improve the church with an
extension to south entrance –
use it for crèche and after
service coffee
Stage 01: Project focus + name
project
TITLE :The Best Project Ever
target USER
GROUP(S) :
Children and young people;
mental health sufferers
key
ACTIVITIES:
Children’s drop-in centre,
children’s sacred space; drop-
in centre for mental health
sufferers
16
Key points:
• There are not as many young
people coming to HPC as there
used to be – renew the mission
focus with a space for them to
“hang out” (sofas, games,
homework area), music
rehearsal and recording spaces,
a large hall that can be sub-
divided for flexibility, and
dedicated sacred space
• Teaching with space – provide a
beautiful, uplifting, inviting
sacred space at a child scale
• Everyone is important - facilities
for mental health sufferers, the
elderly and homeless are also
important
Stage 01: Project focus + name
project
TITLE :Intergenerational
target USER
GROUP(S) :
Elderly, children and teens
key
ACTIVITIES:
Elderly day-centre
Youth skills training (DIY etc)
Youth-elderly volunteering
17
Key points:
• Peace, Intergenerational
connections, Community,
Central cloister, Income
generation
• Make the hall and the church
belong together
• Pre-school shares some
activities and outdoor space
with elderly day-centre
• Intergenerational training and
volunteering programme: train
young people in workshop on
site so they can then do odd-
jobs for the elderly in their
homes.
Stage 01: Project focus + name
18
Stage 02: Prioritizing and connecting spaces
OPEN FAITHIngredients:
1. Large hall – optimized for
performance. Church and
hall = 2 different
performance spaces
2. Small hall (x2) – with own
kitchen connecting into the
church
3. Parish office
4. Church shop/café (x2
5. Catering kitchen
6. Commercial units
7. Lobby: hospitality - social
space for after-service
coffee with own kitchen.
Welcoming view into this
space from Cranley Gdns
External spaces:
Central community ‘cloister’
for all users and open to the
public:
- outdoor space for children’s
facilities
- attractive planting to make
a beautiful space and as
additional draw for wedding
bookings
Private garden at rear for
church use
Connections: Covered walkway
around perimeter of courtyard
– link Park Road side to Cranley
Gardens to church entrance 19
MEETING POINTIngredients:
1. Large hall
2. Small hall (x2) – halls
stacked to echo height of
church: visual symmetry
3. Parish office
4. Meeting room – church
support spaces tucked
away at rear
5. Catering kitchen – for
simultaneity of use,
separate kitchens needed
for church and hall
6. A relaxed sacred space –
make worship visible on
Park Road and more
accessible to newcomers
7. Lobby: hospitality - social
space for after-service
coffee with own kitchen
What not to include:-
• A conference centre - HPC is
not on a tube line and would
need more parking
• Performing arts centre –
there’s one nearby, as well
as another church hall, and
St Mary’s Tower –
complement rather than
compete
• A café – plenty nearby
External spaces: central
community ‘cloister’
Connections: covered walkway
connects the church and halls
1.2.
6.
4.
2.
7.
5.3.
4.2.
1.
3.
5.
7. 4.
2. 6.
6.
community spaces
church spaces
commercial spacesStage 02: Prioritizing and connecting spaces
6.
THE BEST PROJECT EVERIngredients:
1. Large hall – Large hall,
subdividable
2. Small hall
3. - (parish office omitted)
4. Children’s sacred space
5. Music rooms (below)
6. Children’s drop-in centre
7. Mental health drop-in
centre
External spaces:
- Rear garden redesigned to
create a nice place for children
and other users
Connections:
- Community spaces open onto
rear garden
- Independent entrances
from front of site
- Internal connection from
church through the
community spaces
- Children’s sacred space
connects to church
20
5.
LET’S FRONT PARK RDIngredients:
1. Large hall, subdividable, in
most prominent part of site
2. Small hall (x2)
3. Parish office
4. Meeting room (x2)
5. Shared intergenerational
space: a centre for elderly
with dementia – share
activities with the nursery
6. Commercial units – anchor
tenants to secure financial
stability
7. Lobby: hospitality - social
space for after-service
coffee - with own kitchen
and WC. Additional uses eg.
crèche
External spaces: central
community ‘cloister’
Connections: covered walkway
around perimeter of courtyard
- all spaces open into courtyard
apart from lobby extension
which connects to church
community spaces
church spaces
commercial spaces
1.
6
4.
2. 5.
3.
7. 4.
6
2.
1.
4.
2.
5.
6. 7.
Stage 02: Prioritizing and connecting spaces
21
INTERGENERATIONAL
1. Large hall
2. Small hall (x2)
3. Parish office
4. Meeting room (x2)
5. Catering kitchen
6. Music rooms
7. Hotdesking hub
8. Intergenerational
workshop for training young
people so they can do odd jobs
for elderly people in their
homes.
External spaces: central
community ‘cloister’
- peaceful garden centre
- encounter with sacred space
- water feature, benches
- for use by everyone, including
residents, elderly and young
users of the community spaces
- activities: outdoor services,
eating lunch, after-service
socialising, etc
cloister security:
-passive vigilance, lighting, the
space being used and cared for
Connections: all spaces open
into the central courtyard
-a covered walkway connects
all spaces around edge of
courtyard
- Church connects to large hall
across courtyard
1.
2.3. 4.
4.
6.
5. 7.
2.
8.
community spaces
church spaces
commercial spacesStage 02: Prioritizing and connecting spaces
22
Stage 03: Street fronts
STAGE 3: Design the street fronts and decide who can share which spaces.
i.
ii.
23
MEETING POINT
On Park Rd:
1. Large hall
2. Small hall (x2)
6. Relaxed sacred space
-these buildings form an
acoustic barrier to protect the
interior of the site from noise
coming from Park Road
- Access to courtyard
On Cranley Gdns:
6. Relaxed sacred space
7. Lobby: hospitality - social
space
- Church main entrance
- Access to courtyard
Interior of site:
3. Parish office
4. Meeting room (x 2)
5. Catering kitchen
Views
- View of church from Park Rd
and a glimpse inside
- view into church from
Cranley Gdns
- Views into the informal
worship space from the streets
- make church activities and
worship more visible but retain
some privacy inside the church
OPEN FAITH
On Park Rd:
4. Church shop/café (x2
6. Commercial units
- Access to courtyard
On Cranley Gdns:
3. Parish office
7. Lobby: hospitality - social
space
- Church main entrance
- Access to courtyard
Interior of site:
1. Large hall
2. Small hall (x2)
5. Catering kitchen
Views
- The key view is of the site
from Park Road, so the
proposal creates a strong
church presence there.
community spaces
church spaces
commercial spaces
1.2.
6.
4.
2.
7.
5.3.
4.2.
1.
3.
5.
7.
4.
4.
2. 6.
6.
Stage 03: Street fronts
24
LET’S FRONT PARK RD
On Park Rd:
1. Large hall, subdividable, in
most prominent part of site
3. Parish office
6. Commercial units
- Access to courtyard
On Cranley Gdns:
2. Small hall (x2)
4. Meeting room (x2)
7. Lobby: hospitality - social
space
- Church main entrance
- Access to courtyard
Interior of site:
2. Small hall (x2)
5. Day-centre for elderly with
dementia
Views
- The key views are of the site
from Park Road, so the
proposal creates a dynamic,
busy frontage
THE BEST PROJECT EVER
On Park Rd:
7. Mental health drop-in centre
On Cranley Gdns:
- Church main entrance
Interior of site:
1. Large hall – Large hall,
subdividable
2. Small hall
3. - (parish office omitted)
4. Children’s sacred space
5. Music rooms (below)
6. Children’s drop-in centre
Views
- Full view of all the buildings on
site from Cranley Gardens and
Park Road
community spaces
church spaces
commercial spaces
1.
4.
2.
5.
6. 7.
5.
1.
6
4.
2. 5.
3.
7. 4.
6
2.
Stage 03: Street fronts
25
9.
INTERGENERATIONAL
On Park Rd:
1. Large hall
2. Small hall (x2)
7. Hotdesking hub
9. Drop-off point for dial-a-ride
- Access to courtyard
On Cranley Gdns:
- Church main entrance
1. Large hall
- Access to courtyard
Interior of site:
3. Parish office
4. Meeting room (x 2)
5. Catering kitchen
6. Music rooms
8. Intergenerational workshop
Views
- View of church from Park
Road
- View into church from
Cranley Gdns - more light,
more glass at South
entrance
- Parish office commands
view of whole courtyard
and site entrances
community spaces
church spaces
commercial spaces
1.
2.3. 4.
4.
6.
5. 7.
2.
8.
Stage 03: Street fronts
26
Evaluation of the proposals
The evening workshop concluded with a round-up session
in which the groups moved from table to table receiving a
2-minute presentation from each group’s scribe about their
proposal. Participants then voted on which proposal they
thought was the best, giving the reasons for their choice.
INTERGENERATIONAL
5 votes
• Flexible spaces grouped
around a quiet centre
promoting a feeling of
community
• I like the idea of sightlines
and using a peaceful central
space to link the different
buildings
• Well thought out
• Fulfils the aims of HPC
60/60
OPEN FAITH
4 votes
• Openness to the
community
• Keeping the garden
• Cloister open to everyone
• Multi-purpose, versatile
spaces
• Multiple age space
• State of the art
multipurpose hall
LET’S FRONT PARK ROAD
4 votes
• Because it caters for all of
the community
• Excellent use of space
• Shows the church means
business
• I like the social
revolutionary aspect!
• Commercial space
• Balancing income with
community facilities
provision
• Strong church presence
THE BEST PROJECT EVER
0 votes
Images: Design Workshops
Workshop materials
Working through the tasks
Group work underway Recording ideas
27
One of the proposals Voting for the best proposal