Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
-
Upload
mohamedjaoui -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
1/15
Green Light ProgramUniversity of
South Florida
Group 2: The Green BullsAna Chirino
Michael Convery
Kayla Hernandez
Viviana Hernandez
Mohamed Jaoui
ENC 3250: White Paper Project Summer 2010
Professor: Francis Tobienne
2010
Admin
[Type the company name]
8/2/2010
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
2/15
Contents
Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2
Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................. 3
The Meaning of Going Green .................................................................................................. 3
Green Light Program ............................................................................................................................ 4
Green Standards & Goals .................................................................................................................... 6
Christian Wells Associate Professor, and Director, USF Office of Sustainability ............................ ....... 9
Going Green Challenges.................................................................................................................... 14
Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 14
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
3/15
Have you ever bought organic products?Are
you part of any green organization? Do you
recycle? Do you buy biodegradable products?
How does going green make a difference for
you? These are some of the questions asked,
triggering an awareness of how various
choices impact the environment.
According to Max Loodlin, author of an Ezine
article, A green form of energy is not green inthe sense of a color, but rather in the sense of
contributing to the environment. Going
green is a different lifestyle. It is a way to
positively impact our environment based on the
actions and behaviors we implement today. It
is an approach that starts at home, changing
from the use of traditional or regular methods
and moving toward environmentally friendly
products.
Consumers can transition from not recycling at
all, to having a lone recycling bin, to recycling
papers, bottles, cans, and buying
environmentally friendly products, appliances
and light bulbs. In addition, driving a hybrid
car pooling, living in a house made of recycledgoods, maintaining a vegetarian diet are al
incremental changes in the going green
process. There are several simple ways
consumers can implement a going green
lifestyle, including changing their bill delivery
method from mailed to online statements.
Executive Summary
There are few ideas as misunderstood and readily embraced as the idea of going green. Whatdoes it mean? Why is society pressuring companies to challenge themselves and becomemore responsible? Universities are a center of knowledge and a breeding ground for ideas.What happens when a university undertakes a mission to revamp its infrastructure in effort to
green its campus? The University of South Florida has made such an effort. Through readingthe Office of Sustainabilitys documents, interviewing its leader, and evaluating the universitythrough its Green Report Card, a picture can be gleaned. The university is making asignificant effort to meet a series of environmental goals. One tool in the universitys arsenalis the Green Light Program. Through a reduction in the power needed to light its classrooms,recycling, and energy control, the university seeks to make a positive impact on theenvironment and the future. In this paper, we discuss what going green means, the GreenLight Program, the standards set forth, and we interview the director of the Office ofSustainability.
The Meaning of Going Green
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
4/15
Many companies have embraced the idea of
greenly operating their businesses. Some
companies have placed recycle bins for
papers, bottles, and cans at work; they also
buy biodegradable cleaning products, and
avoid buying products that adversely affect the
environment. One of the convenient ways
companies can contribute to a greenenvironment is encouraging employees to not
print emails. In fact, some companies
frequently add a footnote stating, Consider
your environment before printing this email.
However, for some companies going green is
just another marketing tactic to generate
revenue.
Consumers can feel confused or overwhelmed
unsure of what it means to go green or how to
contribute to the movement. Some companies
use the term Greenwashing, referring to the
practice of making untrue claims, falsely
labeling a product as being green. According to
Paul Hawken, activist and author, the news
media and marketers are for turning
environmentalism into fashion a nd distractingfrom serious issues.
The green movement within companies and
consumers has a tremendous impact on our
environment. By continuing to perform these
actions several resources are protected and
pollution of our environment is kept at lower
levels. However, going green is a persona
decision that each individual has to consider.
For a university, going green can involve many factors. There are green house gases to reduce,
transportation infrastructure to develop, building impacts to minimize, and waste management
mandates to issue. A university is a microcosm of society. The changes enacted at a university level
can be experimented with, tweaked, and then disseminated to civilization as a whole.
Green Light Program
With the advent of the going green mentality and its dissemination from homes, to companies, to the
media, the University of South Florida has joined in the movement. The movement from a traditional
energy model to the newly unfolding green paradigm can involve a varying array of transformations.One such transformation, the University of South Florida implemented, is the Green Light program.
The university is seeking to lower both its environmental impact and trim its prodigious utility costs.
The Green Light Program is designed to assist the university in moving forward with these goals.
Through upgrading existing lamp technology, reducing lamp usage, and building a smarter power
grid, the University of South Florida is moving toward
reshaping its energy policies and its image.
Forty-six thousand students enter USFs campuses
yearly (usfweb3). Small incremental changes in the
lighting costs necessary to service those students can
have tremendous effects. One of the first tasks
developed to promote energy efficiency was the
replacement of older T12 fluorescent lamps with
the newer F32 T8 model. Buildings over four
thousand square feet are further being upgraded
to a F28 lamp (acad.usf 8). T12 lamps came into
service during the energy crisis shaping the 1970s.
They offered only a marginal advantage over existing
Studies have shown that
by replacing the standard
T12 light bulb with the
more efficient T8, the
University can save an
estimated 40 percent in
energy costs.
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
5/15
technology. Because of the prevalent energy concerns of the day, they were readily put into service.
The ballasts utilized in the T12s were designed for lower output lighting. They cannot harness the
power of the T12 lamp. This leads to a reduction in the amount of light emitted triggering the
installation of further energy consuming lamps. In addition, T12 lamps operate ten degrees hotter
than comparable bulbs causing increased air conditioning costs (History and Problems of T12).
Electric lighting accounts for twenty-five percent of the costs associated with operating a building
(foodservicewarehouse). As increased building construction fills out the universitys campus, one ofthe best ways to control costs and reduce the schools environmental footprint is to manage lighting.
T8 lamps emit more light at less cost. Studies have shown that T8 blubs can reduce costs by forty
percent when compared to T12s. Beside utility cost reduction, T8 bulbs last longer, running at higher
outputs for a 24,000 hour life versus T8s estimated 20,000 hour life span. The upgrade does not
come without its costs. The choice to move from T12s to T8s costs around twenty dollars per lamp.
According to Food Service Warehouse, the payback period on the swap is anywhere from five to
seven years. Currently, ninety-five percent of all campus fixtures have been switched to the T8
model. Over 120,000 lamps have been replaced (greenreportcard).
Beyond upgrading lamps, the university is also making several other efforts to reduce the impact oflighting costs on campus. Low cost lamps may do wonders for utility bills and secondary energy
usage costs, but the impact of these changes would be stifled if efficient lamps were left running
needlessly. One of the key elements of the Office of
Sustainabilitys plans to go green was the installation of
motion sensing light switches in classrooms. These key
switches eliminate the chances of lights running indefinitely in
empty classrooms. Changes have even affected vending
machines. Modified machines, using motion sensing
technology, have been installed across campus. Ninety
percent of vending machines on campus have been converted(acad.usf 8). It is estimated that ninety percent of all
classrooms have been fitted with motion sensing switches.
Fifty percent of all conference rooms seating more than four
hundred people have seen similar upgrades.
Recycling of lamps is another key initiative. Fluorescent lamps contain mercury, a toxic metal that
causes a variety of birth defects and health hazards. Bulbs are recycled with Frontier Lighting, a
Clearwater based company (acad.usf 10). Opponents of fluorescent bulbs argue that the mercury
content of the lamp poses too high a risk to the environment. However,
the electricity needed to generate a comparable amount of light out ofan incandescent bulb will cause a power plant to emit 7.6 more mgs of
mercury. The increased mercury derived from the additional electricity
outweighs the additional mercury content of the fluorescent lamps
(environment.about).
Another effort pioneered by the universitys Office of Sustainability is
the retirement of older street lights with LED models (acad.usf 13).
LED lights are renowned for their long life span. Compared to other
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
6/15
light technology in the market, they are not the most efficient in terms of lumens per watt. The long
lifespan supersedes the reduced efficiency. LED street lamps last five to ten times longer than
traditional sodium or mercury lamps. This converts to a fifty to eighty percent cost savings. Further,
LED lights contain no environmental pollutants (sunlabob).
Another change was the installation of energy metering systems on many of the universitys buildings
(acad.usf 8). A thorough awareness of which buildings consume more energy can lead to efforts to
counter a buildings specific problems.H
aving an intense metering system can expose issues andflaws in sustainability efforts. Without meters tracking usage and raising red flags, engineers may not
be able to identify high consumption areas.
The university is attempting to reach farther than lighting upgrades and winning small utility cost
battles in its classrooms and research buildings. Underway is a project to forge the largest smart
energy grid in the Southeast. Solar power and biodiesel will work together to supply thousands of
homes with more environmentally friendly energy. Greenhouse gases will be reduced. Energy will be
supplied more reliably and efficiently. The system is built to better weather natural disasters. If
programs such as this were expanded nationwide, causing a five percent increase in the nations
energy grids efficiency, it would be the equivalent of removing fifty-three million cars from thecountrys roads (usfweb3).
Switching from out dated technology to more efficient lamps will generate a tremendous cost savings
for the university. Newer lamps with more longevity will reduce waste and mercury exposure.
Recycling programs can further curb the environmental impact of discarded tubes. Through careful
monitoring and upgrading the energy grid, long term costs can be planned for and reduced. Because
the costs associated with lighting a building composes twenty-five percent of the utility expense,
reducing the energy necessary to illuminate the building can make a powerful difference.
Green Standards & GoalsIn order to understand the University of South Florida's Green Lights programs opportunity to lower
costs and benefit the environment, it is necessary to understand its place in the sustainability effort of
USF as a whole. USF is an active member of two nationally recognized associations for sustainability.
The first being the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE)
and the second, the American College & University Presidents Climate Commitment (ACUPCC).
The Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education was founded in 2005 to
help coordinate and strengthen campus sustainability efforts at regional and national levels, and to
serve as the first North American professional association for those interested in advancing campus
sustainability. Their mission statement is to empower higher education to lead the sustainability
transformation. We do this by providing resources, professional development, and a network of
support to enable institutions of higher education
to model and advance sustainability in everything
they do, from governance and operations to
education and research. The AASHE developed
a standardized instrument by which higher
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
7/15
education institutions measure their progress toward sustainability and achieve recognition.
The Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS) is self-assessment and rating
system, which institutions can benchmark their sustainability progress over time and compare with
others. Participants qualify for different levels of recognition based on level of accomplishment
(sourced from AASHE website). The overall goal of STARS is to help schools set and meet
sustainability goals while fostering information sharing about practices and performance among the
campus sustainability community. All schools that participate in STARS will receive positiverecognition. Schools that register now will be recognized as STARS Charter Participants. Being able
to claim a STARS rating can help an institution reap marketing
and recruitment benefits of sustainability leadership. USF started
participation in January of 2010, and will report their status by the
end of the year. Each STARS rating is an indication of
sustainability leadership. The STARS rating means an institution
has gone through a comprehensive process of collecting and
publicly reporting information related to their sustainability
performance. AASHE's aim is to have STARS recognized as the
consistent tool of measuring sustainability in higher education.Once USF completes, and submits their report, their STARS
ratings will be valid for three years. After three years, an
institution must submit a new report in order to claim a STARS
rating.
By signing the American College & University Presidents
Climate Commitment, USF has agreed to produce three clear and
tangible results. The most ambitious of the initiatives is the development of a comprehensive plan to
achieve climate neutrality. Climate neutrality is a momentous undertaking for any university, let alone
one as large as USF. For purposes of the ACUPCC, climate neutrality is defined as having no netgreenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, to be achieved by minimizing GHG emissions as much as
possible, and using carbon offsets or other measures to mitigate the remaining emissions. Climate
neutrality may take several years to complete. The second initiative requires the university to initiate a
minimum of two out of seven tangible actions to reduce greenhouse gases while a finalized plan is
being completed. The final task, the university has agreed to complete, is to make all plans and
progress include a yearly greenhouse gases emissions report. This report will be made public to both
the university and the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education
(AASHE) for posting and dissemination.
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
8/15
In 2006, Provost and Executive Vice President Dr. Ralph
Wilcox hired Dr. Linda Whiteford (Professor of Anthropology)
to serve as Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs and
Strategic Initiatives, identifying campus and community
sustainability as one of the key target areas for development
and investment. In 2007 Dr. Whiteford convened aSustainability Initiative Steering Committee consisting of thirty
faculty, staff, and students from across the university, serving
on 14 different subcommittees engaged in a wide array of
sustainability initiatives on campus. In 2008 USF President Dr.
Judy Genshaft signed the ACUPCC during the first annual
Going Green Tampa Bay EXPO. In 2009 the Office of
Sustainability was created by Provost Wilcox to manage
USFs climate impact assessment, reporting, and to serve as
the sole point of contact for the universitys sustainabilityprograms and activities. (Excerpt from Implementation
Structurenarrative http://acupcc.aashe.org/ip/847/)
Of the seven Tangible Actions the University of South Florida
has reported and completed five. The university is responsible
for an estimated production of 257,566 metric tons of
greenhouse gases. (GHG Report) In the report It is
recommended that an Office of Sustainability be established
to develop policies and procedures that will assist with future
data collection and with implementing policies to help reducegreenhouse gas production at USF. (GHG Report)
By the year 2050, the University of South Florida will emit 80
percent less carbon dioxide than it did in 2007-2008 (ourGHG
baseline fiscal year). On the way to meeting this goal, USF
has three critical benchmarks: 10% reduction by 2015, 20%
reduction by 2025, and 50% reduction by 2040. Beyond 2050,
and with the aid of offsets (representing purchased RECs
[renewable energy certificates], carbon offsets [CRTs, or
USF Strategic Goals
10% reduction in All Emissions by 2015 relative to baseline emissions in 2009
20% reduction in All Emissions by 2025 relative to baseline emissions in 2009
50% reduction in All Emissions by 2040 relative to baseline emissions in 2009
80% reduction in All Emissions by 2050 relative to baseline emissions in 2009
[ ACUPCCS TANGIBLE ACTIONS ]
1. Establish a policy that allnew campus construction
will be built to at least the
U.S. Green BuildingCouncil's LEED Silverstandard or equivalent.
2. Adopt an energy-efficientappliance purchasing policy
requiring purchase of
ENERGY STARcertifiedproducts in all areas for
which such ratings exist.
3. Establish a policy of
offsetting all greenhousegas emissions generated by
air travel paid for by ourinstitution.
4. Encourage use of andprovide access to publictransportation for allfaculty, staff, students and
visitors at our institution.
5. Within one year of signing
this document, beginpurchasing or producing atleast 15% of our
institution's electricity
consumption fromrenewable sources.
6. Establish a policy or acommittee that supports
climate and sustainability
shareholder proposals atcompanies where our
institution's endowment isinvested.
7. Participate in the WasteMinimization component ofthe national RecycleManiacompetition, and adopt 3 or
more associated measures
to reduce waste.
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
9/15
carbon reduction tons], and increased carbon sequestration
through the expansion of a long-term Greenway project on
campus), USF will be climate neutral by 2070. (USF Climate
Action Plan)
Interview Paraphrased TranscriptInterviewer:Mohamed Jaoui
Guest: Dr. Christian Wells
Title: Director of Sustainability
Topic: The University of South
Floridas sustainability efforts.
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS:
Can you tell us a little bit about the
history of your department and
how it came into being?
In April of 2008 something happened
at USF that was really momentous in
its history. Students got together and
created this going green expo that
brought in and showcased local
green businesses and some research units on campus, just a
big exposition. And during that expo, the students, just
themselves, organized and got the president to sign The
American College and University Presidents Climate
Commitment. This is a big national movement to create
sustainability initiatives at universities; getting universities to be
held accountable for climate change and their role in climate
change.
Our President Judy Genshaft signed that climate commitment in
2008 and that commitment comes with a number of
requirements. One of which is to create a Green House Gas
Inventory which inventories or audits the entire campus in its
operations; what green house gasses are we emitting into the
atmosphere, the primary one being carbon dioxide. The other
requirement is to come up with a long term action plan to
mitigate the adverse impact of those green house gas
emissions and then ultimately to stop them altogether which is a
big, big goal. With those commitments then the President works
with the Provost office to create an office of sustainability to
manage those commitments. Our primary mission in the
beginning was to create and submit this green house gas
inventory and to come up with a long term action plan to bring
Christian
WellsAssociate Professor, and Director,USF Office of Sustainability
Appointed as director in August of 2009,
Director Wells has been responsible for:
initiating the USF Office of Sustainability
as the single point-of-contact for
sustainable activities at USF;
USFs compliance with the American
College & University Presidents Climate
CommitmentCollege Sustainability
Report Card;
He also works closely with students,
faculty, staff and the USF Climate
Commitment Steering Committee to
coordinate university-wide initiatives In
support of USFstrategic goal of building
a sustainable campus environment.
Story written by Jacqui Cash, Academic Affairs
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
10/15
those green house gasses emissions down significantly. This office was created in August of last year
weve only been around a year we are about to have our one year anniversary.
What is sustainability, and what does it mean to be green, are the two interrelated?
The most common definition for sustainability that you might see is about meeting the needs of the
present, our social needs in terms of communities, economic needs, and our environmental needs.
Meeting our present needs in such a way that we dont compromise the ability of future generations to
meet their own needs. In other words, not using up all the resources, coming up with ways to live so
that we can continue to sustain and continue to prosper. Going green is part of the contemporary
sustainability movement that has more jargon. Often the term for going green is more about
environmental sustainability, and sustainability in general combines social, economic, and
environmental concerns.
Can you emphasize the goals and the achievements of the green light program?
Green Light used to be what the Department of Energy and EPA initiated as a sort of pilot to Energy
Star, you might have heard of Energy Star appliances, and Energy Star computers, and Energy Star
ratings. This is the precursor to Energy Star, and this is something that a program that USFparticipated in; that pilot phase. We started to buy appliances and buy electronics that met these
Green Light initiatives. That also included changing out light bulbs, changing the bulbs in parking
garages, stop lights, and so on. It was really headed up by the physical plant, which is a component
of our facilities management office.
You work in coordination with physical plant?
Very closely, yes. Now everything is getting to be Energy Star, where all new purchases made thru
the university are Energy Star.
There are multiple projects undertaken by the USF Sustainability office, but are they really
consistent with your vision or the mission of the Department?
Multiple projects? What do you mean by multiple projects?
We are basing our information on the website that you have. A lot of it said that you have
several projects in the works right now. One was the Green Light program and another being
the LEED Certification for new buildings. You have 3 new buildings that are being LEED
Certified as part of the Presidents Promise. It was one of the agreements that she agreed to
when she signed the Climate Agreement?
Yes, LEED Certifying is something that is certainly consistent with the long term climate action
strategy but it is not the only thing that we have to do, or it is not even something that we are required
to do. Any LEED certifying of buildings that goes on campus is because we want to do it and the
funding source for building the building allows it. There are some buildings and building projects on
campus for example where the funding comes from a private donor for example that does not want
money spent to LEED certify that building so it does not happen. There are other projects in which
USF has more administrative control over how funds get spent so we are able to LEED certify the
building. So really it often depends on the funding source, a lot of constraints.
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
11/15
Would the difference between commissioning and non commissioning, does that come into
play?
Sure. We encourage physical plant that is really in charge of commissioning buildings and finding out
ways to conserve energy in buildings, re-commissioning buildings and so on.
Would you be able to define how commissioning works in general terms?
I dont know the specific process. It is my understanding that you would hire an outside consultant orauditor to do an energy audit on a building, and determine what are the best and most cost effective
ways to increase energy savings, recapture energy thats being lost so and so forth so there would be
a list of things that you can do to improve the energy efficiency of a building so it varies tremendously
from building to building. Newer buildings like the Marshall Center has very few that you can
recommend doing although there are some things. And then there are older buildings like social
sciences or Cooper that are practically falling down anyway. Its cost effective to bulldoze them frankly
and several buildings on campus have been commissioned, and there have been some upgrades,
and updates, and things like that. That is certainly something that we can do more of.
Are there any setbacks that are impeding the implementation of any of these projects?
Money. Funding is always a tricky issue. There are some and that is ultimately the biggest stumbling
block, is funding. But there are still some individuals on campus within faculty, staff, students and
administration that still need to hear about what sustainability is and how those social, environment
and economic issues are all interrelated and they are still not quite on board with sustainability
initiatives or sustainability movement. We just need to increase awareness campaigns, education and
communication. The great thing about communication campaigns is that you can do a lot of talking
and visiting, meeting with people, and it doesnt cost any money at all. Thats what we have been
doing a lot of.
Campus wide re-lamping program is underway to replace F32 fluorescent lamps with F28
lamps for energy reduction. Is this the most energy saving light bulb in the market today? and
what if a new bulb enters the market right after finishing this re-lamping program, would it be
cost efficient to change them again?
Thats the challenge with sustainability and energy savings. Just when you complete a project, an
infrastructure, something better comes along. We face that all along. The re-lamping program does
not exempt from that. There are more energy efficient bulbs in the market, but they are not cost
effective. Within I think its either 3 or a 5 year period that we have to meet those initial first costs, its a
state requirement. We are not allowed to buy equipment or make improvements unless there is apayback thats under a certain period of time. Otherwise its considered an investment and the
university is not allowed to invest public funds. We have the best that we can afford. There is a
balance between being able to be sustainable and also being fiscally responsible for the university we
have to make sure we are covering our end on that dollar. In fact that is what sustainability means, its
integrating the economic constraints that you have, and the needs that you have economically with
what you need to do environmentally, and whats environmentally responsible, and what is socially
responsible too. Its trying to meet all those needs and see how all those things are interconnected.
How are old buildings being retro-fitted to meet the sustainable standards adopted by USF?
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
12/15
That goes back to the question on commissioning and it really depends on each building and when
the building was built. Its a very complicated process, but it used to be when a building was built there
were no funds allocated to maintain the building, and so all funding to upkeep the building, and to
make it more energy efficient would have to come out of physical plant, physical plants budget.
Nowadays, when a new building is built on campus, I think since the 2005 master plan, for a new
building to be built, it has to come along with a recurring budget of maintenance money to take care
of that building. So the newer buildings, buildings built in the past 5 years are so come with that
funding, and so its a little easier to maintain them, and continue to make them energy efficient, butthe older buildings have simply no budget allocated for that at all. Any upgrade projects have to be
special non recurring funds, funds that you dont get every year in the regular budget. So, those are
hard to come by. Not impossible, but just the subject of negotiation and finding the money. One of the
things that student government at USF has been doing is trying to come up with a Green Team. You
might have heard about the Green Team. There was a referendum to see what students thought
about it, and it would be tacking on a dollar per credit hour or something like that or maybe a dollar
per student on to tuition charges, and that extra dollar would go towards making buildings more
energy efficient, more sustainable.
What is USFs LEED rating? And why doesnt it meet the platinum standard of 80points orabove?
I think that now you can, I dont know if you can get a LEED rating for an entire business, district, or
group of buildings, I think its still per building. That really depends on the purpose of the building,
what its going to be used for, and where the funding comes from to build it, and it will also depend
whether or not when our new Tampa campus master plan goes into effect. I think its December of this
year. There is a policy in there that states that all new buildings on campus must be LEED certifiable,
in other words they must be built with LEED certification in mind. You cant require a building to be
LEED certified, but you can build it with that in mind, that you want to do that eventually some day. I
dont know yet what they set standard for. It could just be LEED bronze or something like that. Wejust have the one building that they are aiming for LEED gold, this new Patel Center; its just off of
alumni over here. I dont know the LEED certifiable standards of the new interdisciplinary science and
teaching building.
How about funding? Is your budget consistent with other same size universities?
Thats a great question and I dont think its at this point knowable because more and more
universities of this size are implementing an office of sustainability, coordinator of sustainability, but
their budgets are not published, are not known. I dont know other peoples budget. Thats a great
mystery. You can tell whose better funded than others because of the staff that they have and theactivities that they are doing, but I couldnt put a dollar figure.
Along those same lines, do you have a sense of how USF compares to its peer institutions
when it comes to both quantity and quality of green research?
Well, I have a sense because there was a survey done by the Princeton guide to schools. They
surveyed about 650 schools and then chose 200 and something to highlight as being the greenest in
US, and we were one of those schools. So, we are in good company. Other schools are in good
company with us I should say. And with these new initiatives with the school of global sustainability
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
13/15
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
14/15
you about those issues. If you are not conversed in those issues, you are certainly not competitive as
someone else who is.
Going Green Challenges
In todays society thinking greener is thinking cleaner. A multitude of large corporations, such as
universities, are constantly pushing the envelope of greener technology. The University of South
Florida is no exception and is considered to be in the top 10 of greener universities. Each new school
year brings fresh ideas on greener initiatives specifically geared towards making universities more
energy-efficient. However, going greener does not happen over night. Many universities are facing
different obstacles and overwhelming challenges in order to provide its students greener living.
In a poll that was released on August 25 th, 2008 with attendees at the annual conference of the
Association for Information Communications Technology Professionals in Higher Education
(A.C.U.T.A.), two-thirds of American colleges and universities stated that their campuses are going or
have gone green. Out of the two-thirds of colleges and universities that stated that they have gone
green only 65 percent of them invested in greener technology, or either had initiated online
education programs about going green, or have implemented policies in order to reduce energy
consumption in order to help the environment. Of those schools that havent yet gone green, three-
fourths have at least looked into how to be more environmentally sensitive but are being held back by
budget limitations or other obstacles, ("eSchool News").
How to pay for energy-efficient equipment is an entirely different matter. Universities on a tight budget
may just laugh at the idea, even if the idea of becoming more energy-efficient can produce a profit in
a short amount of time. In the end it is unfortunately the students holding the bill to pay for such
equipment. For example, students at Central Oregon Community College voted last spring to
increase their $1.75-per-credit hour student fee by 25 cents in order to purchase renewable energy
(Makower).
Of the schools surveyed that have yet to go green, 72 percent state that due to the lack of funding,
the institution is being held back from pursuing greener, more efficient energy use. Another problem
that was reported by the survey was the fact that 32 percent of non-greener schools state that there
are difficulties in locating energy-efficient equipment, which will allow future cost savings. Amongst
the non-green schools, the biggest motivators to going green are cost, energy consumption and
savings, and a sense of environmental responsibility, ("eSchool News").
ConclusionThe University of South Florida has made a concerted effort to approach the need for reduced green
house emissions and a reduction of the schools environmental impact. In recent years going green
has become a battle cry for society and corporations. The university has delved down many of the
paths necessary to meet sustainability goals. Through upgraded lighting, monitoring energy
consumption, and moving toward alternative power grids, the University of South Florida has become
one of the most energy conscientious educational institutions in the nation. In the future the economy,
and other socioeconomic factors, may curb the schools ability to continue pursuing green goals.
-
8/9/2019 Green Light Program University of South Florida[1]
15/15
Through increased education and social awareness, green lights may continue to illuminate
classrooms across campus going dim only when those rooms are unoccupied.
Images Source Cited
GreenLi. Google Images Web. 2 Aug 2010
"GreenRe."Helloky.com. Web. 1 Aug 2010.
.