Energy Efficiency Agreements - EU Sustainable Energy Week · A successful Finland means local...
Transcript of Energy Efficiency Agreements - EU Sustainable Energy Week · A successful Finland means local...
A successful Finland means local action
Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy in Buildings-EE -agreement-case Lahti-case Ii-case Oulu
EUSEW 21.6.2017, BrusselsKalevi Luoma
Energy Efficiency Agreements 2017-2025
▪ Comprehensive voluntary energy efficiency agreement scheme was initiated in
Finland as early as in 1997
▪ The agreement scheme has produced desired results
▪ The new agreement period 2017–2025 launched in January 2017
ENERGY
CONSERVATION
AGREEMENTS
1997–2007
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
AGREEMENTS
2008−2016
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
AGREEMENTS
2017−2025
INDUSTRIES │ MUNICIPAL SECTOR│ PROPERTY SECTOR │ OIL SECTOR
2
3
4
Energy Efficiency Agreements 2017-2025
3. MUNICIPAL
SECTOR2. PROPERTY SECTOR 4. HÖYLÄ IV − OIL SECTOR
DISTRIBUTION OF LIQUID HEATING
FUELS
Oil-heated real estates
1. INDUSTRIES
CITIES &
MUNICIPALITIES &
JOINT MUNICIPALITIES
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
HOUSING PROPERTIES
ENERGY SECTOR
Energy Production l Energy Services
INDUSTRY
Energy Intensive Industry l Food and Drink
Industry l Chemical Industry
Technology Industry l Wood Product
Industry l Industry - General
SERVICE SECTOR
Commerce Sector l Hotel and Restaurant
Sector l Motor Trades & Repairs l
Services – General
5
Subsidies for energy audits and energy efficiency investments
▪ The Government subsidies* the Motiva-model energy audits and analyses.
▪ According to Article 6 of the Energy Efficiency Act (1429/2014), the mandatory energy
audits of large companies are not subsidised
▪ The Government subsidies* case-dependently available for energy efficiency
investments* using new energy-efficient technology
▪ The participants in Energy Efficiency Agreements can also apply for
discretionary subsidies* from the Government for conventional energy efficiency
investments
* Energy subsidies are not granted for housing properties
6
TARGET SETTING
EEAs 2017–2025
▪ Indicative target in energy units will be set in accession documents
▪ Target for the whole period will be set for the year 2025 and intermediate target
for the year 2020
▪ Target for the year 2025 corresponds 7.5% of the participant energy use**
▪ Target for the year 2020 corresponds 4% of the participant energy use
▪ The targets will be calculated on the participant’s most recent available energy
use which corresponds normal operation
▪ Participant’s absolute energy use need not in years 2020 and 2025 to be less
than in the year reported in the accession document
▪ To be countable for the follow up of the achievement of the targets energy
savings for the implemented measures need to be in force in the follow up year
* Medium-sized industry and private service sector
* If participant wants to use 2014−2016 reported measures targets are higher (10,5% and 7%)
7
Lahti
-attractive and vital home city of
103000 citizens
The recent main EE -activities and quidelinesefficiency in City of Lahti
➢ ESCO –procedure with a private company, savings of 6 GWhconsumption means 3 % savings in total consumption
➢ Better efficiency in working space areal contains best savingpotential but difficult to realize
➢ Improvements in regular following of energy consumption➢ Remote reading of E- and H -meters, alarming functions
when abnormalities➢ New buildings and renovations: low or zero energy➢ Timing of partial or total renovations➢ Planning instructions
➢ Small investments includes mainly in yearly budget
Energian ominaiskulutus kWh / m²
69.670.3
66.2
67.6
65.4
64.0
65.0
55.8
61.9 63.1
59.7
61.7 61.3
59.357.6
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
80.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
kW
h/m
³
Year
City of Lahti Specific energy consumption trend of city owned buildings,
kWh/m3 (heat +electricity, with temperature correction)
Green City target
2005-2016: - 15 %
11
12
Bioeconomy & Cleantech - IiGrowth from Sustainable Development
Municipality of Ii13
Municipality of Ii - RE forerunner
Aims
-to increase the production and share of
renewable energy and
-to decrease energy consumption in municipality
facilities, residents and companies
• Create oil free community (long term)
• Decrease CO2 emissions
• Attract RE investments (short & long term)
• Decrease costs (short & long term)
10 000 inhabitants
Method: Pilots – Measurements – Upscaling – Large scale investments
By doing you learn and achieve knowledge cumulation14
Geothermal heating3 public schools (2012 - 2013)
▪ Municipality organized a public tendering process
▪ The construction company was selected with full
service ability: earthmoving, responsible for building
permits, taking care of drilling debris and
disassembling old heating systems
▪ Installation of heat pumps
▪ Drilling depth varied from 240m to 350m
▪ 10 -15 drilled wells per school
▪ Installation took 1-2 months
▪ Old oil boilers and electric grid were kept as backup
heating system
Emission
reduction
kg
CO2e/a
Inv. Cost
EUR
Oper.
Cost
EUR/a
(before)
Inv.
payback
time in
years
School 1:
Alaranta24 200 190 000 12 000
(36
000)
7
School 2:
Asema89 000 120 000 13 000
(45
000)
4
School :3
Pohjois-Ii85 000 120 000 12 000
(41
000)
5
Total SAVINGS in
operational cost
85 000 € / a
15
Wood based fuels (Biomass)School Olhava (2012)
▪ Woodchip heat plant were installed in a
container near by the school
▪ Heat will delivered from the container to
the boiler room by a pipeline
▪ The ashes for forest fertilizer
▪ Old oil boilers in reserve heating system
Savings 12 000 € / a
Emission reduction 120 000 kg CO2e/a
Investment costs 30 000 €
Operational cost (before) 35 000 €/a (47 000 €/a)
Investment payback time 2,5 a
16
Impact Examples
What Where Investment Cost
savings
Pay back
time
Emission
reduction
[€] [€/a] [a] [kg CO2e/a]
Geothermal
heat replacing
oil
3 municipality
schools
390 000 85 000 4,7 198 200
Wood chips
replacing oil
Olhava school 30 000 6 000 5 120 000
Improving
energy
efficiency
Valtari school 300 23 000 0 5 500
Geothermal
heat replacing
oil and
electricity
Rental houses
(52 apartments)
330 000 60 100 3,3 156 000
Biofuels
replacing oil
and peat
Kuivaniemi
district heating
Municipality
sold existing
plant
1 923 900
Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings
▪ 5 schools
▪ Industrial facility
▪ Technology center
▪ Elderly care home
▪ 5 apartment buildings
▪ New-built properties
Improving efficiency by:▪ Adjusting air ventilation, room
temperature, water pressure,
▪ Adding insulation
▪ Installing LED lights (indoor / outdoor), setting operation times
▪ Reducing use of oil
▪ Geothermal heat pumps
▪ Wood based fuels / Biomass
▪ residues from logging and bush clearance (woodchips)
▪ Pilot case: Rooftop solar panels for heating water
Installing wireless / real-time consumption measurements
Temperature / Heat
Water
Electricity
18
Heading to Low Carbon Society:
Results and Achievements
• Investments 1,7 M€ (2012–2015)
• Total savings:
✓ Energy: 7 707 MWh (from 2010)
✓ CO2: 63 000 tonsCO2/a (*)
✓ Euros: 566 000 €
• Oil consumption reduction 314 544 l/a.
✓ 2010: 367 492 l/a
✓ 2015: 52 950 l/a
(*) According to Finnish Environmental Institute (17.11.2015),
Ii municipality is the number one emission reducer in Finland with -67 % CO2
Acknowledgements
Ii was selected as one of the Best Nordic Bioeconomy Cases under category
`Collaborate´ in 2016 by the The Nordic Council of Ministers and the Nordic
Bioeconomy Panel
Nominee of Nordic Council Environmental Prize 2014
19
• Information and energy saving tips for schools and homes, to teachers and pupils
• Prize for schools 50 % of energy saving costs
Energy and Climate Information to Schools
50/50 Model
• 3 schools participated Euronet 50/50 project
2014–2015 EU project of energy saving in schools –
Aim was to reduce water, electricity and heat
consumption
• During 2014 schools saved energy worth of 6 351 €
• According to 50/50-metod municipality will refund 50 % of
the saved energy to schools
• 2016: 50/50 model is in use in every school and
kindergarten
20
City of Oulu200 000 inhabitants
Energy Savings 2008 -2016:
Heat 18 424 MWh 13,3% 921 200 €
Electricity 8 421 MWh 13,6% 732 600 €
Water 67 656 m3 17,4% 181 995 €
Total 1 835 795 €/ a
CO2 emissions decrease 2010-2016 5953 t CO2/a
(Energy efficieny aiatehokkuustoimenpiteistä laskettu)
Raksila swimming hall
Actions:• Ventilation controlled by CO2 and temperature and movement sensor
• Wet spaces´ ventilation by CO2, moisture and temperature sensors
• Optimation of water flows
• Shower panels
• Renewing of main Air Condition machine
• Entrance hall renovation
Raksila swimming hall -consumption and
costs 2010 and 2014Vuosi 2010: kustannus Vuosi 2014 kustannus Heat 6 997 MWh 266 000 € 5 350 MWh 203 000 €
Electricity2 580 MWh 215 000 € 2 312 MWh 193 000 €
Water 89 715 m3 240 000 € 54 794 m3 147 000 €
Tot 721 000 € 543 000 €
Yearly users 621 005 620 261
Cost savings 2010 vs 2014: 178 000 €
Energy saving around 1,9 GWh
A successful Finland means local action
25
Thank you-Kiitos