Design and Economy of Renewable Energy Sources to Supply

download Design and Economy of Renewable Energy Sources to Supply

of 4

Transcript of Design and Economy of Renewable Energy Sources to Supply

  • 8/16/2019 Design and Economy of Renewable Energy Sources to Supply

    1/4

    C

    IRE

    0

    20

    th

    International

    Conference

    on Electricity

    Distribution

    Prague 8 11 June

    2009

    Paper 0404

    DESIGN AND ECONOMY OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES TO SUPPLY

    ISOLATED LOADS AT RURAL AND REMOTE AREAS OF EGYPT

    (2)

    (3)

    and the

    AblaGADO

    Rural Electrification Authority, Ministry of

    Electricity

    &

    Energy, Shebin El-kom, Egypt

    dr [email protected]

    ABSTRACT

    Meteorological conditions in many sites of the world

    countries as well as in Egypt are well adapted to install

    more than one

    of

    renewable energy sources (RESs) to

    supply electrical loads. Solar and wind energies are the

    most convenient and economic types of RESs pertaining

    the Meteorological conditions

    of

    Egypt. Also, the main

    type

    of

    isolated loads at rural and remote areas

    of

    Egypt is

    pumping loads for irrigation purposes. So, three

    alternatives

    of

    solar photovoltaic and wind energy

    systems can be used to supply these loads. In this work, a

    proposed model has been introduced to evaluate the

    design and economy

    of

    these alternatives to supply

    isolated loads in a remote area. This model is used also

    for optimizing these alternatives

    of

    RESs from

    economical point

    of

    view. The proposed model depends

    on the Meteorological data at the installation site, the

    performance

    of

    solar photovoltaic and wind energy

    systems used, the type and capacity of energy storage

    facility employed, the economical parameters of these

    resources and load.

    The proposed model is applied numerically to design

    three alternative sources

    of

    solar photovoltaic and wind

    energy systems to supply an isolated load in a remote area

    of

    Egypt. The economy

    of

    these sources are determined

    and compared to develop the most economical one of

    these RESs.

    Introduction

    More than small villages in remote areas ofEgypt have no

    reliable source and had no local transmission grid. These

    areas extend from 22° N up to 31.5° N and enjoyed with

    3000 to 4000 hours

    of

    sunrise per year [1]. Most of these

    areas have yearly average wind speed of 10meters per

    second [ 2]. So, the actual energy needed for these

    villages

    of

    Egypt offer a rewarding opportunity for the

    utilization solar and wind energy system can be used to

    supply electrical loads in such areas. But, the

    intermittency

    of

    solar radiation and wind speed is the

    main problem

    of

    these sources . The solution of this

    problem is in general employing energy storage facilities

    or small diesel-generator to supply loads at the time of

    unavailability output

    of

    these RESs. On the other hand,

    diesel generator is unreliable and costly [3]. Also, the

    storage battery is the major cost element of RESs, have a

    limit life-time and require regular maintenance [4].

    Therefore, the design and economy

    of

    solar photovoltaic

    (PVS) and wind energy (WES) systems depends on many

    variables, namely; the meteorological data at the

    Atef EL-ZEFTAWY

    Dept ofElec. Engineering, Faculty

    of

    Engineering,

    Menoufiya University, Shebin El-kom, Egypt

    [email protected]

    installation site, the performance

    of

    PVS and WES used,

    the type and capacity of energy storage facility employed

    , the economic parameters of these resources and load.

    In previous publications [5], a proposed generation

    model has been introduced to develop the availability of

    PVS and WES to meet an isolated load. Also, a proposed

    technique has been given to find correlation between the

    outputs of wind energy system and load demand in order

    to decrease the whole power cost [6]. In other references

    [7,8] , load management techniques are suggested to

    minimize the capacity

    of

    storage battery with power

    suppliers in remote areas.

    In this work, a proposed generation and cost model has

    been introduced to develop the economical source of three

    options of RES to supply an isolated load. These options

    are solar photovoltaic or/ and wind energy systems

    accompanied with energy storage facility.

    2. PROPOSED APPROACH:

    The model aims to develop the economical source of

    three options

    of

    renewable energy sources to supply an

    isolated load in remote areas. This load comprises several

    individual loads such as residential and water pumping

    loads. The study options ofRESs are shown in Fig

    .l

    and

    the specification

    of

    these options are given below:

    l-Solar photovoltaic power system accompanied with an

    energy storage facility (ESF).

    2-Wind energy system accompanied with ESF.

    3- Solar photovoltaic and wind energy system

    accompanied with ESF

    The design and cost of each option are modeled here as

    followings:

    Option 0):

    The generation system in this option is PVS and two of

    energy storage facilities. These facilities are battery and

    water storage (basin) for irrigation, Fig. l-a, The hourly

    insolation and the average monthly temperature through

    the year months at the installation site may be used for

    designing PVS as follows:

    a- The hourly generation

    of

    a standard PVS has a peak

    power of IkW and number

    of

    modules m through the

    year months (Pe(i

    j»)

    is given as follows [9]:

      PC i,})) = m * VC i.}) * f c i,})  l )

    Where the hourly voltage (Ve(ij») and current

    (le(ij»)

    of one

    PVS module through the i th hour

    of

    the month j of the

    year are:

    VC i,})

    =

    24 -2.1

    *

    1 0 3  TcO)

    -

    25)

    f c i,})=

    1.35

    H i.}) +

    O.5*1O 3 Tcor

    25

    Where and T

    e

    G

    are solar insolation

    CIRED2009

    Session

    4

    Paper No 0404

  • 8/16/2019 Design and Economy of Renewable Energy Sources to Supply

    2/4

    C

    IRE

    0

    20

    th

    International

    Conference

    on Electricity

    Distribution

    Prague, 8 11 June

    2009

    Paper

    0404

    Fig-la- Option (1); solar photovoltaic system and ESF.

    Option (2):

    A wind energy system (WES) accompanied with

    storage battery and water storage (basin) is used here to

    supply the load demand as shown in Fig. l-b. The hourly

    output of WES through the year months (Pw ij» is

    deduced as a function

    of

    the installat ion site and WES

    characteristics as in reference [5].

    The annual energy output of this WES (Ec) is given as:

    Irrigation

     

    Plant

    ;,

    Pump1

    ' Water

    basin

    Residential

    :;

    load  

    ~

    - . : -    

    ....-=;...-

    CI C Storage AC/DCcn erter

    convert battery

    Fig-lb- Option (2); wind energy system and ESF.

    t; =LL PW i

    ,} )

     13

    Consequently, the

    number

    ofwind-generator of rated

    power, P

    wg

    required to meet the load demand is obtained

    from equations 7 and 13.

    The mass balance equation between the generation

    and load in this option is given as:

    P

    ) ~ P I

    = P  W i,j) +PS i,j) + P sp i,j)

     14

    Where;

    P w i,j)

    is the direct wind generation used.

    Computer package in reference [10] is used to assess the

    capacities of the storage battery and water basin required

    for this option ofRESs.

    The cost function

    of

    this option   f

    02

    ) is given as:

    £; 2

    =

    f

    w

    + fs (15)

    Where f

    s

    is given as in equation

    11

    and f

    w

    is cost function

    of the WES and given by:

    f

    w

    = N

    w'

    D

    w'

    cw'Pwg (16)

    where N

    w

    D;

    and

    Cw

    are the number of wind generator

    (WG) used, the annual discount rate and the capital cost

    per

    1

    kW

    of

    the WG have rated power

    ofP

    wG

    WESn , -.... , - - - - . . / . { r igation

      7'; - r  , Water r an.t,

      pu p\

     

    -' basin

    P : i , ~ P S i,J +

    P P

    i,J (17)

    Where; v  i.j)

    + w

    i,}) - PL i ,}) (18)

    Thus, the rated and peak power of WES and PVS, and

    capacities

    of

    the storage battery and basin are determined

    for this option. The cost function of this option of RESs

      o3) is given as:

    1 3=Iv +Iw +Is  19

    Where  v Iwand

    Is

    are determined from equations 10, 16

    and 11 respectively.

    WES: ·I..

    - r - ,

    PVS

     > : ··.• )

    ,.. -' ..

    I

    / DClAC

    /- '-,/ - / - / ' cd ivertt

    , f . ,I . / .... ;...../

    l -

      ' I Residential

     

    :

    ,.

    load

    Fig-lc. Option (3) Solar photovoltaic & wind energy

    system and ESF.

    3. APPLICATION:

    The proposed model in section 2 is applied to supply

    an isolated load at EL-kharga oasis (25

    0

    27

    N) in the

    western desert

    of

    Egypt. Fig -2 gives the average daily

    Option (3):

    Solar photovoltaic and wind energy systems

    accompanied with storage battery and water storage

    (basin) are used here to feed the load demand, Fig .

    l-c

    .

    The mass balance equation between the hourly

    generation P1 ij) for this option

    ofRES

    s

    is given by :

    Irrigation

    plant

    .

    Residential

    ---- +

      load

    -----,..-.

    Pump

    Water

    C;

      > basin

    / : ~ > :

    :-

    ·1

    ;

    '.'

    .L

    battery

    temperature through i th hour of the month

    j

    respectively.

    The annual DC energy, EJ:DC) and AC energy EJ:AC)

    outputs

    of

    this PVS are given as:

    Ev DC) =

    L L ~ i  4

    Ev AC)

    = 1 J ~

    >Ii

    Ev DC)  5

    Where

    1]pc

    is the efficiency

    of

    inverter.

    b- The power and energy requirements for load comprises

    residential and pumping loads can be stated as:

    PI

    i,})

    = Pr

    i,j)

    +

    P p i,})

     6

    s,

    =L L r.;

      7)

    Where

    P . i ~

    Pr(J) and Pp(ij) are the total hourly, residential

    and pumping loads through the j th month and E. is the

    total annual load.

    E q u ~ t i o n s 5 and 7 reveal the peak power of PVS, P

    vp,

    required for meeting the load demand,

    c- The mass balance equation between PVS generation

    and load is given by:

    PV i

    ,} ) = = P : i ,} ) + +

    P SP

    ,} )  8

    Where; p  \{iJ), P

    s(ij)

    and Psp ij) are the direct and storage

    powers for residential and pumping loads through the i th

    hour of the j th month .

    This model can be used with a published computer

    package [10] to find correlation between PVS generation

    and load, and estimate the capacities of storage battery,

    CBs, and water basin, Qs

    p

    be used for supplying

    residential and pumping loads at non- powering

    ofPVS

    .

    The cost function ofthis option ofRESs is:

     o

    = Iv

    +

    Is  9

    Where f

    v

    and

    fs

    are the cost functions

    of

    PVS and storage

    facilities used which are given as:

    Iv =

    o,

    *c

    v

    * r; (10)

    f s=D

    sCB

    s+

    o,*c

    p

    *Ep+D

    sp

    *c

    sp

    *Qsp (11)

    where D ; D; D

    sp

    and D

    p

    are the annual discount rate

    of

    PVS CBs: Qs

    p

    and the annual energy required for pumps,

    E

    p'

    and given by

    [11] :

    D

    =

    r 1+rl / [ 1+rl-l]  12

    Where, r,n are the interest rate and life time of the

    considered system.

    PVS

    CIRED2009 Session 4

    Paper No

    0404

  • 8/16/2019 Design and Economy of Renewable Energy Sources to Supply

    3/4

    C

    IRE

    0

    20

    th

    International Conference

    on

    Electricity Distribution

    Prague

    ,

    8 11 June

    2009

    Paper

    0404

    load curve through a year. This figure illustrates the

    categories

    of

    the load at the considered site [5].

    Fig-2 average yearly daily load curve

    at El-kharga oasis [5].

    Solar radiation, temperature, wind speed and its

    direction, humidity and air pressure have been measured

    by the Meteorological Authority of Egypt at the

    considered site [1,2]. These data are utilized with the

    previous published models [9,12] to estimate the solar

    radiation received on PVS array, and wind speeds

    through the year seasons (months). Fig. 3 gives the daily

    solar radiation received on unit area

    of

    the PVS array

    through the year seasons. While, Fig. 4 depicts the hourly

    wind speed at the study site. Results

    of

    these figures are

    used with the proposed model in section 2 to determine

    the design and economy

    of

    the suggested RES options to

    supply the load demand in Fig. 2. This load curve can be

    modified to generate water pumps through the hours of

    high insolation [6].

    carrying out this application:

    l-Wind-generators

    of200

    kW rated power are used.

    2- A storage source battery is used to supply residential

    loads, while a basin is used for irrigation at non

    powering ofRESs.

    3- The charge source for the pumping storage is restricted

    by the permitted loading in PVS and WES, while the

    storage battery is charged from PVS in option 3.

    4- Water- pumps are driven by a 5 HP, 220 v induction

    motor.

    5- When the feeder pump is operating it can delivers 40

    % of the basin capacity in one hour . While, the

    irrigation plant's operation requires 20

    %

    of the basin

    capacity each hour.

    6- The economical parameters of PVS, WES and storage

    facilities are taken from references [11,13].

    7- life- time of PVS and WES is taken as 20 and 30

    years, while the life- time

    of

    the storage battery, water

    pump-set , and water basin are 2.5 and 50 years

    respectively.

    The computer pakage in reference [10] is applied to

    estimate the peak power ofPVS, the number

    ofWES

    , the

    capacity

    of

    the two storage facilities used and the cost

    function of the suggested three options to supply the

    given load. The results

    ofthis application are summarized

    as follows:

    Option 1 Option2 Option 3

    Peak power ofPVS, kW 2664.5 21

    Number ofwind-generator 2 1

    Capacity

    of

    the storage 664 473 440

    battery, Ah

    Capacity

    of

    the reservoir, m'

    2475 3150 400

    Cost function,

    1.

    E.lyr

    226465 206769 125401

    The above summarized results concluded that opion (3)

    has small capacity

    of

    storage battery and storage water

    (basin) compared with other options. So, this option is the

    economical source

    of

    RESs to supply the load demand at

    the considered site

    of

    Egypt. Also, it should be declare

    that the utilization

    of

    PVS with energy storage facilities,

    option (1), is costly due to the high cost

    of

    PVS elements

    and big capacity of the energy storage facilities require

    for this source.

    a) Spring season

    Dayllours

    -

    _

    March

    _· · -April

    -

    Mo

    ,

    0000

     00

    i

    c

    600

    500

    400

    .iii

    300

    S  00

    '00

    ,

    I-,

    -,   ~   -,,-.

    - ,,

    ->

    , - ,- -,,

    i

      2O: l-,_ _, - -, _,_

    t:

    _ ~ , , , _

     

    - . .. .  Decerrtl&r

    ·· ·

    .· ·

    ·January

    - february

    6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    DrI, llours

    a) Winterseason

    90  

    A.Jlping load

    80

      .Residential load

    70

    60

    .....

    .

    -

    50

    ., j

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    0 2 4 6 8

    1Bay

    16 18 20 22 24

    N •• _ _• Jul)t

    8)() . - A..gust

    eoo

    ..

    .

    .

    i ..

    D> '

    o

    800

    600

    'DO

    e

    200

    0

      -

    ----.-----,.-----.-------.- .------.----.- -.-------.- .-----.-------,

    o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

    Day h

    our

    s .

    Fig. 4 the average hourly wind speed at the study site

    through a day

    of

    different year seasons.

    The following assumptions are considered through

    a) Summer season a) Autumn season

    Figure 3. The hourly solar radiation at

    El-kharga

    site

    throygh a day

    of

    different year months.

    4-CONCLUSION:

    A proposed model is presented in this paper to design

    three alternative sources

    of

    solar photovoltaic and wind

    energy accompanied with energy storage facilities to

    supply isolated loads. Also, an economical model for

    optimizing these renewable energy source alternatives

    has been introduced. The proposed model is applied

    numerically to design the suggested RES alternatives in

    order to supply an isolated load in a remote area of Egypt.

    Moreover, the economies

    of

    these alternatives are

    deduced. The remarkable results

    of

    this application may

    summarize as given below:

    1- Option (3), solar photovoltaic and wind energy

    systems accompanied with energy storage facilities, is the

    most economical source of the study RES alternatives

    (125,401 L.E./yr). While, option (1), solar photovoltaic

     

    Spring

      S

    UrTTT

    r

      Autunm

    - - - - IMnter

    10

    1:

    6

    14 .......

     E

    ~ 2

    CIRED2009

    Session

    4 Paper No 0404

  • 8/16/2019 Design and Economy of Renewable Energy Sources to Supply

    4/4

    C

    IRE

    0

    20

    th

    International

    Conference

    on Electricity

    Distribution

    AblaGado

    Prague 8 11 June

    2009

    Paper 0404

    Atef El-zeftawy

    power system accompanied with energy storage

    facilities, is very high cost (226465 L.E./yr). The annual

    cost of option (2) is 206769 L.E ( 1.0 = L-E 5.5).

    2- Utilization of different type of RESs to supply

    electrical loads in remote areas decrease the capacity of

    energy storage facilities and the corresponding costs.

    REFERENCES

    [1] The European Commission and United Nation

    Development Programming; Energy as a Tool for

    Sustainable Development Programming; forAfrican,

    Caribbean and Pacific Countries E and Coweb site,

    www.Energy house.com, 1999.

    [2] New and Renewable Energy Authority; Egyptian

    Solar Radiation Atlas Cairo, Egypt, 1998.

    [3] Photovoltaic(http://

    en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title- photovoltaic&

    action=edit).

    [4] AL-Ibrahim,

    AM

    ., Beckman, W.A., Klein, S.A. and

    Mitchell,

    lW

    .; Design Proceedure for Selecting on

    Optimum Photovoltaic Pumping System in a Solar

    Domestic Hot Water System Solar Energy, Vol. 64,

    Issues 4.6, December 1998, pp. 227-239.

    [5] Ahmed, G.E.; Photovoltaic- Powered Rural Zone

    Family in Egypt Renewable Energy, Vol. 26, Issue

    3, July 2002, pp.379-390.

    [6] Large-Scale, Cheap Solar Electricity

    (http: //www

    .technologyreview

    .com/red-artide

    aspex?id=17025&ch=biztech).

    [7] Building integrated photovoltaic

    (http://www.buildingsolar.com/technology.asp).

    [8] Eraky, S.A.; Assessment of Operating Photovoltaic

    Power System for Residential Loads Ph. D. Thesis,

    Faculty of Engineering, Menoufiya University,

    Egypt, 2000.

    [9] Aly,G.e.M, El-zeftawy, A

    A,

    Eraky, S. A and

    Abou-Elazm.A . M.; Modelling of Alternative PV

    Design Methodes and Application in Egypt

    Proceedings of 9 th International Middle East Power

    Conference, MEPCON' 2003, Shebin El-kom Egypt,

    December 16-18

    ,2003,

    pp.671-675.

    [10] Abou-Elazm, A.M., Aly, G. E. M., El-zeftawy, A

    A , Eraky, S. A.; Optimizing of Alternative PV

    Design Methods for Residential Application

    Proceedings of 10 th International Middle East

    Power Conference, MEPCON' 2005, Port-Said,

    Egypt, December 13-16,2005.

    [11] Edin, R. ,Ponser, M., Bending, R., Couch, E. and

    Stainslow, J.; Energy Economics, Growth,

    Resources and Policies Campridge University

    Press, UK, 1998.

    [12] Salameh, Z.M.; Photovoltaic Module- Site

    Matching Based on the Capacity Factors IEEE

    Transaction Energy Conversion, Vol.10, No.2, June

    1995, pp.326-332.

    [13] Alsema, E.A, Wild Scholten, M.J.de; Fthenkis,

    Y.M.; Environment impact of PY electr icity

    generation-a critical comparison of energy supply

    options (http://www.ecn.nI/publications/

    default.aspex:2nr=E(N-RX-06-016)

    [14] Ministry of Electricity and Energy of Egypt,

    Personal Communication.

    CIRED2009 Session 4

    Paper No

    0404