Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 15/11/20151 Power and Control.
-
Upload
madlyn-hart -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 15/11/20151 Power and Control.
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
20/04/23 1
Power and Control
Power and Control
• Objectives:1. To be introduced to mainstream and critical perspectives
of power and control
2. To understand the relationship between control and
power
3. To describe the primary methods of organizational
control
4. To apply Hopwoods’ model of control
Mainstream approaches: Introduction
• Political behaviour– Extends beyond the formal authority that accompanies
a person’s position in the chain of command– Involves the informal use of power to cultivate allies
and control information– Is directly linked to decision making
• Incorporates both unitarist and pluralist perspectives
Unitarism and Pluralism
• Unitarism– Assumes the view of top
management shared by all employees
– Conflict the result of poor communication by management or the intervention of ‘troublemakers’ (e.g. unions)
– Aims is eradication of conflict
• Pluralism– Recognises a diversity of
interests in an organization– Conflict inevitable and
normal– Aims is negotiation and
bargaining over competing interests
Key concepts in the classical (unitary) tradition
• Focus on the formal structure of the organization• Concern to identify the right formal organization• Belief in the existence of one best form of organization• Seeking to describe organizational rules, often called principles• Belief that organizational principles are applicable to all types of formal
organization• Keenness to identify the best way of dividing up the task to be done• Stress on the need for clarity in role specification and performance• Placing emphasis on hierarchical control and similarities between members• Insufficient attention paid to the diversity of problems experienced in different
types of organizations
Assessing power
Primary Types of Mainstream Organizational Control (Hopwood)
• Administrative controls: Mechanisms, techniques and processes that are consciously and purposefully designed in order to control the behaviours of individuals, groups and organisations
• Social control: Process through which obedience, compliance and conformity to predetermined standards of behaviour are achieved through interpersonal and group processes
• Self-control: Norms embodied in administrative or social controls must be either directly or indirectly internalised by the members of the organisation and operate as personal controls over attitudes and behaviour
Hopwood’s Model of Control“Accounting & Human Behaviour” 1974
OrganisationControls
SocialControls
SelfControls
AdminControls
Difference between social control and administrative control
• Where management attempts to disseminate a culture through consciously designed, planned strategies to regulate and inculcate particular systems of belief and meaning in subordinates – this is administrative control
• Socialisation is the informal area of social control. It is not the result of a planned strategy but arises spontaneously out of everyday social interaction among members.
Administrative controls
Top-down authority, with emphasis on positional power
Emphasis on extrinsic rewards (wages, pensions, status symbols)
Activity-based job descriptions that prescribe day-to-day behaviour
Attempt to constrain and influence employees by either specifying of influencing:
Value premises of behaviour
Training; Recruitment and Selection
How tasks are performed
Rules, procedures
Output consequences
of performance
Budgets; MBO
Social controls and self-controls
• Socialisation • Values; norms; organisational stories• Group goals and norms• Emphasis on meaningful work (intrinsic
rewards)
Perspectives on power
• ‘’... Capability of an actor to achieve his or her will, even at the expense of others who may resist him ...’’
• ‘’...power should be seen as a property of the collectivity ...’’
Sources of PowerBased upon French & Raven’s model
Power
Personal Structural
Elements of personal power
• Expertise• Legitimate • Referent • Rewards/ coercion • Association
Elements of personal powerSources Definition StrategiesExpertise Knowledge and skills which others
see as relevant to task accomplishment and which the individual is seen as possessing
Obtaining credentials or ongoing experiences which others respect
Legitimate Formal position and roles which define responsibilities and appropriate scope of activity
Ensuring roles and expectations are clear and recognised as legitimate
Referent Power which comes from trust and commitment given to an individual because of his/her personal traits and characteristics
Build respect and trust through personal integrity, charisma
Rewards/ coercion Behaviours which reward or hurt others but which ensure compliance and buy-in
Accumulating things of value to others or punishment which can harm others
Association Influence which comes from knowing powerful people
Networking and developing connections and associations
Elements of structural power
• Emphasis moves away from personal power (that is ascribed to the individual), towards an understanding of the power that rests in the position or location an interest group, sub-unit, or department holds in the structure of the organisation
Elements of structural power
• Control of scarce resources• Centrality• Visibility • Coalitions• Flexibility/ autonomy
Elements of structural powerSources Definition StrategiesControl of scarce resources Ability to allocate resources
(information, money etc.) among groups with competing interests
Obtain positions which are responsible for distribution and allocation of resources
Centrality Tasks or positions which are in the middle of a communication network
Obtain central positions where others are dependant on you
Visibility Positions which are seen by those of power and influence in the organisation
Seek out tasks which have a high profile
Coalitions Power which comes from building support from groups with similar interests
Systematically seek support from others based on an analysis of their interests
Flexibility/ autonomy Positions which are characterised by discretion in decision-making, work assignment
Seek out tasks which are not routine and which contain autonomy and room for independent decision-making
Mainstream structuralist approach• Shares the pluralist assumption that
organizations are complex social units where individuals interact
• Focuses on the conditions which determine the decisions that can be made
• Demonstrates the large influence of organizational structures on decision making
Mainstream approaches: Limitations• Classical (unitary)
– Fail to recognise the importance of power, competition, conflict and limits to rationality
• Pluralist and mainstream structuralist– Acknowledges diverse interests, competition and conflict but
conception of power is shallow• Politics and negotiations are minor issues and do not challenge
prevailing structures• Managers are not presumed to have their own interests• Big issues of conflict (e.g. poverty, the environment) are
marginalized
Critical approaches: Overview• Connect politics and decision making to the
wider political and economic context– Assume that internal dynamics reflect broader patterns of
power and inequality in society• E.g. Marxist analysis links work organizations to the
dynamics of the capitalist system
A critical approach to power• Seeks to question existing structure of power
relations• Sees politics as necessary to secure
compliance/consent• Perceives power as a relationship, where its
use is dependent on compliance/consent
Case study: The story behind the water in Walkerton, Ontario
Case study question
Using Hopwood’s 3 primary types of organisational control analyse the Walkerton, Ontario case study
And finally… if you have any questions regarding your assignment please ask