of 18

• date post

01-Mar-2018
• Category

## Documents

• view

221

0

Embed Size (px)

### Transcript of Cantilever Curtain Wall

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

1/18

Verification Samples

Cantilever Curtain Wall

1 Objective

To check the safety of using a single (4CS2X065, 50Ksi) section as a stud for a cantilever

curtain wall, given the following data:

The design is based on AISI-NASPEC 2001 with 2004 supplement, using the LRFD method.

The wall height = 8 ft.

The stud spacing = 24 in.

The bridging members are located @ 24 o.c.

The lateral bracing spacing is considered equal to the bridging members spacing.

The torsional bracing spacing is considered equal to the bridging members spacing.

The wind load intensity (IWL) = 20 psf.

The wind load factor for strength = 1.25.

The wind load factor for lateral deflection = 1.0.

The web is unreinforced for shear strength calculation.

The factor (Cb) = 1.0 for lateral-torsional buckling stress calculation.

The web-crippling check is considered, and the bearing length (N) = 1.25 in.

The effect of cold-work of forming is not considered.

The effect of the standard punch-out (4" X 1.5") is not considered.

The maximum allowed lateral deflection = L/ 360, where (L) is twice the wall height.

The maximum absolute deflection is 0.6 in.

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 1 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

2/18

2 Modeling with SteelSmart System

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 2 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

3/18

3 Statical System, Loads for Strength, and Forces

8 ft50 8 ft50

19.2019.20

0.400.40

Figure 1 Statical System, Loads for Strength, and Forces

4 Safety Check

4.1 Design for flexural moment (Mx)

Figure 2 shows the cross-section elements with their corresponding numbers.

2

1

1

2'

3

Figure 2 Elements o f the Cross-Section and Their Numbering

The major flexural strength of the section (Mx-all) is the least of the flexural strength at the initiation

of the cross-section yielding and the lateral-torsional buckling strength.

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 3 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

4/18

4.1.1 Flat Widths Calculation

Considering (D) the section depth, (B) the flange width, (C) the lip width, (t) the section

thickness, and (R) the inside bend radius of the section corners; the flat widths of the elements

subjected to compressive stresses shown in Figure 3 can be calculated as follows:-

W1 = C (t + R)

= 0.881 (0.065 + 0.1875) = 0.6285 in.

W2 = B 2(t + R)

= 2 2(0.065 + 0.1875) = 1.495 in.

W3 = D 2(t + R)

= 4 2(0.065 + 0.1875) = 3.495 in.

W

W

2W

1

3

Figure 3 Flat Widths of Elements Subjected to Compressive Stresses

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 4 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

5/18

4.1.2 Initiation of Yielding (Section C3.1.1 in the 2001 Specification)

(tension-compression) which has a value of (Fy) at the top fiber of the compression flange (Figure

4).

2 - 1f

Fbottom top

= F = 50 ksi

= 50 ksitop

1 - 1f and

2 - 3f

f2

Mx

N.A.

F

f1 - 3

3

2'

1

1'

2

Ycg0 = 2 in.

Figure 4 Location of N.A., Stress Distribution, and Critical Stresses on the Fully EffectiveSection for Initiation of Yielding)

Iteration (1)

The section is assumed to be fully effective, i.e. the N.A. will be located at a distance from the

bottom fiber of the tension flange equal to half the section depth (Figure 4).

4.1.2.1 Effective properties calculation

4.1.2.1.1 Element (1) and Element (2)

Element (1) is classified as an unstiffened element under stress gradient, thus, the

plate buckling coefficient (K) used for the calculation of the effective width of (W1) is determined in

accordance with section B3.2 (a) in the 2004 supplementas follows:-

f1-1 = compression stress at the upper end of W1, (Figure 4)

=y

cgo

cgoF

YD

RtYD

= 50*24

1875.0065.024

= 43.6875 ksi

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 5 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

6/18

f2-1 = compression stress at the lower end of W1, (Figure 4)

= ycgo

cgoF

YD

CYD

= 50*24

881.024

= 27.975 ksi

= f2-1/ f1-1= 0.6403434 (Eq. B3.2-1)1

K = 0.578/ (+ 0.34) =0.5895894 (Eq. B3.2-2)1

The effective width of (W1) is then calculated in accordance with Section B2.1 (a) in the 2001

specificationas follows:

Fcr =

2

1

2

2

W

t

)1(12

EK

(Eq. B2.1-5)

=2

2

2

6285.0

0.065

)3.01(12

29500**0.5895894

= 168.1376 ksi

=cr

11

F

f (Eq. B2.1-4)

= 0.509737 < 0.673

d'1 = effective width of (W1)

= W1 (Eq. B2.1-1)

= 0.6285 in. (fully effective)

Element (2) is classified as a uniformly compressed element with an edge stiffener, thus, the

plate buckling coefficient (K) used for the calculation of the effective width of (W2) is determined in

accordance with Section B4.2 (a) in the 2001 specificationas follows:

f2 = compression stress at the centerline of W2, (Figure 4)

=y

cgo

cgoF

YD

t5.0YD

= 50*24

065.0*5.024

= 49.1875 ksi

1Supplement 2004 to the NASPEC-AISI 2001 for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 6 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

7/18

S =2fE28.1 (Eq. B4-1)

= 49.18752950028.1 = 31.34683

W2/ t = 23 > (0.328S = 10.28176)

Ia =3

24 328.0S

tWt399

(Eq. B4.2-10)

= ( )3

4328.0

31.34683

23065.0399

= 4.756928 * 10

-4in

4

Ia-max =

+5

S

tW115t 24

= ( )

+5

31.34683

23*115065.0

4 = 1.595463 * 10-3

in4> Ia

Is =( )

12

SintW 23

1 (Eq. B4-2)

=( )

12

90Sin*065.0*6285.0 23

= 1.34477 * 10-3

in4

RI =a

s

I

I (Eq. B4.2-9)

= 2.826971 >1.0 RI= 1.0

n =

S4

tW582.0 2 (Eq. B4.2-11)

=

31.34683*4

23582.0 = 0.3985684 > (1/3)

2WC = 1.495881.0 = 0.5892977, > 0.25 and < 0.8

Using Table B4-2;

K = ( ) 43.0RWC5

82.4 n

I2

+

= ( ) 43.01495.1

881.0*582.4

0.3985684 +

= 2.303512 < 4.0

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 7 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

8/18

The effective width of (W2) is then calculated in accordance with Section B2.1 (a) in the 2001

specificationas follows:

Fcr =2

22

2

W

t

)1(12

EK

(Eq. B2.1-5)

=2

2

2

495.1

0.065

)3.01(12

29500**2.303512

= 116.1004 ksi

=cr

2

F

f (Eq. B2.1-4)

=116.1004

49.1875 = 0.6508942 < 0.673

b2 = effective width of (W2)

= W2 (Eq. B2.1-1)

= 1.495 in. (fully effective)

d1 = reduced effective width of (W1)

= d'1RI (Eq. B4.2-7)

= 0.6285 *1 = 0.6285 in.

Rem1 = removed width of (W1) due to local buckling

= W1 d

1=0.6285 0.6285 = 0

Rem2 = removed width of (W2) due to local buckling

= W2 b2= 1.495 1.495 = 0

4.1.2.1.2 Element (3)

Element (3) is classified as a stiffened element under stress gradient (tension-

compression), thus, the plate buckling coefficient (K) used for the calculation of the effective width

of (W3) is determined in accordance with section B2.3 (a) in the 2001 specificationas follows:

f1-3 = compression stress at the upper end of W3, (Figure 4)

=y

cgo

cgoF

YD

RtYD

= 50*24

1875.0065.024

= 43.6875 ksi

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 8 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

9/18

f2-3 = tensile stress at the lower end of W3, (Figure 4)

=y

cgo

cgoF

YD

RtY

= 50*24

1875.0065.02

= -43.6875 ksi

= 3132 ff (Eq. B2.3-1)

= 43.687543.6875- = 1.0

K = 4 + 2(1 + )3+ 2(1 + ) (Eq. B2.3-2)

= 4 + 2(1 + 1)3+ 2(1 + 1) = 24

The effective width of (W3) is then calculated in accordance with Section B2.1 (a) in the 2001

specificationas follows:-

Fcr =2

32

2

W

t

)1(12

EK

(Eq. B2.1-5)

=2

2

2

495.3

0.065

)3.01(12

29500**42

= 221.3313 ksi

=cr

31

F

f (Eq. B2.1-4)

=221.331343.6875 = 0.4442805 < 0.673

b3 = effective width of the compressed part of (W3)

= W3-Comp (Eq. B2.1-1)

= D Ycg0 t R = 1.7475 in. (fully effective)

Rem3= 0

Remt = the total removed length of the section due to local buckling

= Rem1+ Rem2+ Rem3

= 0 + 0 + 0 = 0

Ae = effective area of the section

= Ag (Remt* t) = 0.593034 in2(fully effective).

Cantilever Curtain Wall SteelSmart System 7.0 SP2

Page 9 of 18

• 7/26/2019 Cantilever Curtain Wall

10/18