BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School...

37
REPORT BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and Development Committee brampton.ca FlOWef City Committee of the Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton Date: October 29, 2013 PLANNING, DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE date y\/ue*bei< \i} 2QI3 Files: C04W10.010 Subject: RECOMMENDATION REPORT Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law GLEN SCHNARR & ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEEL DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD (To permit the development of a secondary school and community park) 1985 Bovaird Drive West Ward: 6 Contact: Allan Parsons, Manager, Development Services Site Plan Approvals, Planning and Building Division, 905-874-2063 Overview: This report recommends approval of an application to amend the Zoning By law to develop the subject property for a community park and a secondary school. The development proposal is consistent with the Official Plan policies, by providing a campus of community facilities to be shared between the City of Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. The subject lands are currently owned by the City of Brampton, however, it is intended that the portion of lands to be used for a secondary school will be purchased by the PDSB in conformity with Council's direction to negotiate a land exchange (CW121 -2012). The lands are to be developed in partnership with the Peel District School Board in order to maximize the use of the land and provide the greatest value to the community. Items to be potentially shared between the school and park properties includes a running track, a combination of cricket and soccer fields, multi-purpose courts, a skate park, a walking trail and shared parking facilities. The proposal will achieve a well-balanced community, which is consistent with the goals of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan, by providing institutional and recreational uses, protecting the natural environment and preserving the City's cultural heritage resources (Andrew McCandless Plank House). This report recommends specific zoning provisions in order to permit the shared use of parking facilities and to ensure the natural features are preserved.

Transcript of BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School...

Page 1: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

REPORTBRAMPTON bull Planning Design and Development Committeebramptonca FlOWef City Committee of the Council of

The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Date October 29 2013 PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

date yuebeilt i 2QI3Files C04W10010

Subject RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEEL

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

(To permit the development of a secondary school and community park) 1985 Bovaird Drive West

Ward 6

Contact Allan Parsons Manager Development Services Site Plan Approvals Planning and Building Division 905-874-2063

Overview

bull This report recommends approval of an application to amend the Zoning By law to develop the subject property for a community park and a secondary school

bull The development proposal is consistent with the Official Plan policies by providing a campus of community facilities to be shared between the City of Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community

bull The subject lands are currently owned by the City of Brampton however it is intended that the portion of lands to be used for a secondary school will be purchased by the PDSB in conformity with Councils direction to negotiate a land exchange (CW121 -2012)

bull The lands are to be developed in partnership with the Peel District School Board in order to maximize the use of the land and provide the greatest value to the community Items to be potentially shared between the school and park properties includes a running track a combination of cricket and soccer fields multi-purpose courts a skate park a walking trail and shared parking facilities

bull The proposal will achieve a well-balanced community which is consistent with the goals of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan by providing institutional and recreational uses protecting the natural environment and preserving the Citys cultural heritage resources (Andrew McCandless Plank House)

bull This report recommends specific zoning provisions in order to permit the shared use of parking facilities and to ensure the natural features are preserved

ei-oi

Recommendations

1 THAT the report from Allan Parsons Manager Planning and Infrastructure Services and Paul Aldunate Development Planner dated October 29 2013 entitled RECOMMENDATION REPORT to the Planning Design and Development Committee Meeting of November 18 2013 re Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEEL DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Ward 6 File C04W10010 be received

2 THAT Planning Design and Development Committee recommend approval of the subject application in principle and that staff be directed to prepare the appropriate documents for the consideration of City Council in general accordance with the following

21 The Zoning By-law be amended by changing the zone from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and Floodplain (F) zone with the following requirements and restrictions

a) The site specific Institutional One zone shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and

b) The site specific Institutional One zone shall have a minimum of 330 parking spaces

3 THAT prior to enactment of the Zoning By-law the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Genivar Inc shall be finalized to the satisfaction of the Region of Peel

4 THAT prior to enactment of the Zoning By-law the Functional Servicing Report prepared by SKIRA and Associates Ltd shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Chief Planning and Infrastructure Services Official in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

5 THAT prior to site plan approval the following studies and reports shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official

51 The Geotechnical Investigation Reports prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the secondary school and community park

52 The Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc

53 The Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc

54 Confirmation of the filing of a Record of Site Condition with the Ministry of Environment

55 A copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and 56 A copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system

associated with the residential use

et-gt

6 THAT the applicant shall agree in writing to the form and content of an implementing zoning by-law amendment for the subject lands

7 THAT the decision of approval for the subject application be considered null and void and a new development application be required unless a zoning by-law is passed within 18 months of the Council approval of this decision

BACKGROUND

Origin This application was submitted by Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc on February 6 2013 on behalf of the Peel District School Board

Date of Public Meeting The public meeting for this application was held on Monday April 8 2013 There were no members of the public in attendance

Planning Area The subject lands are located at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive within Sub Areas 1 amp 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan A Block Plan was approved for this area in September 2004 The Block Plan designates a community park a public secondary school and a portion of a minor collector road (Elbern Markell Drive) for the lands subject to the application (see Appendix 5) As a result of discussions between both the City and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) the location of the community park and secondary school as shown on that approved Block Plan have been switched Their new locations will maximize the use of the lands to meet the PDSBs needs and will also implement the Citys urban design objectives by framing the highly visible intersection of Bovaird Drive West and Elbern Markell Drive with a well-designed school

Background On May 9 2012 City Council authorized staff to negotiate land exchange between the City and the PDSB to facilitate the development of a community park and a public secondary school at the south-east corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive (CW121-2012)

The PDSB is intending to acquire approximately 67 ha (165 ac) of the 20 ha (50 ac) of land currently owned by the City of Brampton for a secondary school which is programmed to be opened in September 2016 In order to develop the lands the PDSB has submitted an application to amend the Zoning By-Law

The application also proposes to rezone the remaining 13 hectares (32 acres) of the subject property that is to remain in City ownership which is located south of the proposed secondary school for a community park Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application because the property line distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands has yet to be finalized In addition the secondary school and community park are proposing a reduced parking rate for their shared parking facility

bullbull

ei-H

The minimum required parking spaces will be included in the implementing zoning by law

Proposal The PDSB is proposing to build a 3-storey public secondary school for the accommodation of approximately 1500 students on the northerly half of the subject lands The preliminary site plan (Map 1) shows a 3-storey school building with a gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 19318 m2 (207938 ft2) and 330 on-site parking spaces to be shared between the school (160 parking spaces) and community park (170 parking spaces)

The concept site plan that is submitted by the PDSB proposes four vehicular access points along the future Elbern Markell Drive (Collector Road) The northerly two access points are meant to provide for school bus drop-off and parking for the school The third and fourth southerly access points are meant to provide full moves access to both the school and the Citys recreational facility These details however may be subject to change through the required site plan approval process

The lands along the western edge of the property will be preserved as valleyland The Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources is proposed to remain in its current location under City ownership for future restoration and adaptive reuse

MAP 1 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN

BOVAIRD ORNE mccandless farm 1

heritage property

V raquo

v

I HELPORT

DEVELOPMENTS

City of Brampton Andrew mccandless park

II

gi-s~

Property Description and Surrounding Land Use

The subject lands have the following characteristics

diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection

diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)

diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road

diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP

follows

North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)

South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park

East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial

West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range

pound|-U

PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY

The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application

Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6

Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy

A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required

The proposed development represents good planning

Respectfully submitted GPO

Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building

Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pound1-1shy

APPENDICES

Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract

Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map

Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract

Append x - Existing Land Use Map

Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3

Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis

Append x - Public Meeting

Append x - Results of Application Circulation

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON

I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA

CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND

RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA

AREA

APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 2: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

ei-oi

Recommendations

1 THAT the report from Allan Parsons Manager Planning and Infrastructure Services and Paul Aldunate Development Planner dated October 29 2013 entitled RECOMMENDATION REPORT to the Planning Design and Development Committee Meeting of November 18 2013 re Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEEL DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Ward 6 File C04W10010 be received

2 THAT Planning Design and Development Committee recommend approval of the subject application in principle and that staff be directed to prepare the appropriate documents for the consideration of City Council in general accordance with the following

21 The Zoning By-law be amended by changing the zone from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and Floodplain (F) zone with the following requirements and restrictions

a) The site specific Institutional One zone shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and

b) The site specific Institutional One zone shall have a minimum of 330 parking spaces

3 THAT prior to enactment of the Zoning By-law the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Genivar Inc shall be finalized to the satisfaction of the Region of Peel

4 THAT prior to enactment of the Zoning By-law the Functional Servicing Report prepared by SKIRA and Associates Ltd shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Chief Planning and Infrastructure Services Official in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

5 THAT prior to site plan approval the following studies and reports shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official

51 The Geotechnical Investigation Reports prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the secondary school and community park

52 The Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc

53 The Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc

54 Confirmation of the filing of a Record of Site Condition with the Ministry of Environment

55 A copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and 56 A copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system

associated with the residential use

et-gt

6 THAT the applicant shall agree in writing to the form and content of an implementing zoning by-law amendment for the subject lands

7 THAT the decision of approval for the subject application be considered null and void and a new development application be required unless a zoning by-law is passed within 18 months of the Council approval of this decision

BACKGROUND

Origin This application was submitted by Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc on February 6 2013 on behalf of the Peel District School Board

Date of Public Meeting The public meeting for this application was held on Monday April 8 2013 There were no members of the public in attendance

Planning Area The subject lands are located at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive within Sub Areas 1 amp 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan A Block Plan was approved for this area in September 2004 The Block Plan designates a community park a public secondary school and a portion of a minor collector road (Elbern Markell Drive) for the lands subject to the application (see Appendix 5) As a result of discussions between both the City and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) the location of the community park and secondary school as shown on that approved Block Plan have been switched Their new locations will maximize the use of the lands to meet the PDSBs needs and will also implement the Citys urban design objectives by framing the highly visible intersection of Bovaird Drive West and Elbern Markell Drive with a well-designed school

Background On May 9 2012 City Council authorized staff to negotiate land exchange between the City and the PDSB to facilitate the development of a community park and a public secondary school at the south-east corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive (CW121-2012)

The PDSB is intending to acquire approximately 67 ha (165 ac) of the 20 ha (50 ac) of land currently owned by the City of Brampton for a secondary school which is programmed to be opened in September 2016 In order to develop the lands the PDSB has submitted an application to amend the Zoning By-Law

The application also proposes to rezone the remaining 13 hectares (32 acres) of the subject property that is to remain in City ownership which is located south of the proposed secondary school for a community park Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application because the property line distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands has yet to be finalized In addition the secondary school and community park are proposing a reduced parking rate for their shared parking facility

bullbull

ei-H

The minimum required parking spaces will be included in the implementing zoning by law

Proposal The PDSB is proposing to build a 3-storey public secondary school for the accommodation of approximately 1500 students on the northerly half of the subject lands The preliminary site plan (Map 1) shows a 3-storey school building with a gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 19318 m2 (207938 ft2) and 330 on-site parking spaces to be shared between the school (160 parking spaces) and community park (170 parking spaces)

The concept site plan that is submitted by the PDSB proposes four vehicular access points along the future Elbern Markell Drive (Collector Road) The northerly two access points are meant to provide for school bus drop-off and parking for the school The third and fourth southerly access points are meant to provide full moves access to both the school and the Citys recreational facility These details however may be subject to change through the required site plan approval process

The lands along the western edge of the property will be preserved as valleyland The Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources is proposed to remain in its current location under City ownership for future restoration and adaptive reuse

MAP 1 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN

BOVAIRD ORNE mccandless farm 1

heritage property

V raquo

v

I HELPORT

DEVELOPMENTS

City of Brampton Andrew mccandless park

II

gi-s~

Property Description and Surrounding Land Use

The subject lands have the following characteristics

diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection

diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)

diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road

diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP

follows

North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)

South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park

East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial

West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range

pound|-U

PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY

The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application

Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6

Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy

A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required

The proposed development represents good planning

Respectfully submitted GPO

Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building

Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pound1-1shy

APPENDICES

Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract

Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map

Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract

Append x - Existing Land Use Map

Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3

Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis

Append x - Public Meeting

Append x - Results of Application Circulation

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON

I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA

CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND

RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA

AREA

APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 3: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

et-gt

6 THAT the applicant shall agree in writing to the form and content of an implementing zoning by-law amendment for the subject lands

7 THAT the decision of approval for the subject application be considered null and void and a new development application be required unless a zoning by-law is passed within 18 months of the Council approval of this decision

BACKGROUND

Origin This application was submitted by Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc on February 6 2013 on behalf of the Peel District School Board

Date of Public Meeting The public meeting for this application was held on Monday April 8 2013 There were no members of the public in attendance

Planning Area The subject lands are located at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive within Sub Areas 1 amp 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan A Block Plan was approved for this area in September 2004 The Block Plan designates a community park a public secondary school and a portion of a minor collector road (Elbern Markell Drive) for the lands subject to the application (see Appendix 5) As a result of discussions between both the City and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) the location of the community park and secondary school as shown on that approved Block Plan have been switched Their new locations will maximize the use of the lands to meet the PDSBs needs and will also implement the Citys urban design objectives by framing the highly visible intersection of Bovaird Drive West and Elbern Markell Drive with a well-designed school

Background On May 9 2012 City Council authorized staff to negotiate land exchange between the City and the PDSB to facilitate the development of a community park and a public secondary school at the south-east corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive (CW121-2012)

The PDSB is intending to acquire approximately 67 ha (165 ac) of the 20 ha (50 ac) of land currently owned by the City of Brampton for a secondary school which is programmed to be opened in September 2016 In order to develop the lands the PDSB has submitted an application to amend the Zoning By-Law

The application also proposes to rezone the remaining 13 hectares (32 acres) of the subject property that is to remain in City ownership which is located south of the proposed secondary school for a community park Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application because the property line distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands has yet to be finalized In addition the secondary school and community park are proposing a reduced parking rate for their shared parking facility

bullbull

ei-H

The minimum required parking spaces will be included in the implementing zoning by law

Proposal The PDSB is proposing to build a 3-storey public secondary school for the accommodation of approximately 1500 students on the northerly half of the subject lands The preliminary site plan (Map 1) shows a 3-storey school building with a gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 19318 m2 (207938 ft2) and 330 on-site parking spaces to be shared between the school (160 parking spaces) and community park (170 parking spaces)

The concept site plan that is submitted by the PDSB proposes four vehicular access points along the future Elbern Markell Drive (Collector Road) The northerly two access points are meant to provide for school bus drop-off and parking for the school The third and fourth southerly access points are meant to provide full moves access to both the school and the Citys recreational facility These details however may be subject to change through the required site plan approval process

The lands along the western edge of the property will be preserved as valleyland The Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources is proposed to remain in its current location under City ownership for future restoration and adaptive reuse

MAP 1 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN

BOVAIRD ORNE mccandless farm 1

heritage property

V raquo

v

I HELPORT

DEVELOPMENTS

City of Brampton Andrew mccandless park

II

gi-s~

Property Description and Surrounding Land Use

The subject lands have the following characteristics

diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection

diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)

diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road

diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP

follows

North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)

South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park

East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial

West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range

pound|-U

PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY

The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application

Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6

Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy

A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required

The proposed development represents good planning

Respectfully submitted GPO

Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building

Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pound1-1shy

APPENDICES

Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract

Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map

Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract

Append x - Existing Land Use Map

Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3

Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis

Append x - Public Meeting

Append x - Results of Application Circulation

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON

I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA

CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND

RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA

AREA

APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 4: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

bullbull

ei-H

The minimum required parking spaces will be included in the implementing zoning by law

Proposal The PDSB is proposing to build a 3-storey public secondary school for the accommodation of approximately 1500 students on the northerly half of the subject lands The preliminary site plan (Map 1) shows a 3-storey school building with a gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 19318 m2 (207938 ft2) and 330 on-site parking spaces to be shared between the school (160 parking spaces) and community park (170 parking spaces)

The concept site plan that is submitted by the PDSB proposes four vehicular access points along the future Elbern Markell Drive (Collector Road) The northerly two access points are meant to provide for school bus drop-off and parking for the school The third and fourth southerly access points are meant to provide full moves access to both the school and the Citys recreational facility These details however may be subject to change through the required site plan approval process

The lands along the western edge of the property will be preserved as valleyland The Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources is proposed to remain in its current location under City ownership for future restoration and adaptive reuse

MAP 1 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN

BOVAIRD ORNE mccandless farm 1

heritage property

V raquo

v

I HELPORT

DEVELOPMENTS

City of Brampton Andrew mccandless park

II

gi-s~

Property Description and Surrounding Land Use

The subject lands have the following characteristics

diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection

diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)

diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road

diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP

follows

North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)

South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park

East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial

West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range

pound|-U

PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY

The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application

Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6

Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy

A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required

The proposed development represents good planning

Respectfully submitted GPO

Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building

Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pound1-1shy

APPENDICES

Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract

Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map

Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract

Append x - Existing Land Use Map

Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3

Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis

Append x - Public Meeting

Append x - Results of Application Circulation

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON

I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA

CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND

RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA

AREA

APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 5: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

gi-s~

Property Description and Surrounding Land Use

The subject lands have the following characteristics

diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection

diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)

diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road

diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP

follows

North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)

South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park

East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial

West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range

pound|-U

PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY

The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application

Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6

Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy

A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required

The proposed development represents good planning

Respectfully submitted GPO

Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building

Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pound1-1shy

APPENDICES

Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract

Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map

Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract

Append x - Existing Land Use Map

Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3

Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis

Append x - Public Meeting

Append x - Results of Application Circulation

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON

I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA

CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND

RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA

AREA

APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 6: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

pound|-U

PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY

The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application

Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6

Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy

A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required

The proposed development represents good planning

Respectfully submitted GPO

Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building

Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pound1-1shy

APPENDICES

Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract

Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map

Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract

Append x - Existing Land Use Map

Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3

Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis

Append x - Public Meeting

Append x - Results of Application Circulation

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON

I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA

CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND

RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA

AREA

APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 7: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pound1-1shy

APPENDICES

Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract

Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map

Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract

Append x - Existing Land Use Map

Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3

Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis

Append x - Public Meeting

Append x - Results of Application Circulation

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON

I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA

CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND

RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA

AREA

APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 8: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON

I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA

CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND

RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA

AREA

APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 9: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

cc

SUBJECT LANDS ehlt

EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN

_rss_

RESIDENTIAL

Low Density 2

Medium Density

COMMERCIAL

Convenience Commercial

INSTITUTIONAL

Public Secondary School

Secondary Plan Boundary

OPEN SPACE

Primary Valleyland

Secondary Valleyland

Terrestrial Features

m Community Park

Potential Stormwater Management Ponds

INFRASTRUCTURE

Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads

APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 10: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

11

1892

R2A

| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN

RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE

APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS

bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Peel District School Board 50 100

Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010

1314

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 11: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

SUBJECT LANDrzz]

bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT

Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07

OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House

APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC

Peel District School Board

CITY FILE C04W10010

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 12: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

EHshySUBJECT

LANDS

BOVAIRD DRIVE

LEGEND

RESIDENTIALbull

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull

m SCHOOL

m PARK

m VALLEY EH HERITAGE

bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP

COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN

APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board

Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 13: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

ampH3

APPENDIX 6

DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010

Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004

Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields

Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City

Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan

The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities

Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required

13

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 14: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

ei-N

Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features

Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan

ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone

Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized

14

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 15: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

em^t

The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods

Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines

Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric

The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street

Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers

15

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 16: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

pound|~(

The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat

The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat

In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction

In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted

bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park

bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and

bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013

The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official

Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

16

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 17: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

Gf-rr-

The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include

bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence

bull A Support facility for outdoor uses

It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate

AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment

TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel

The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking

17

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 18: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

EH

requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended

The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive

bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park

The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school

In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide

Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park

The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel

Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section

Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan

18

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 19: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

em

Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)

The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8

Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation

19

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 20: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

poundK2lts

APPENDIX 7

PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010

Members Present

Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4

Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department

D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner

Corporate Services Department

J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator

Results of the Public Meeting

A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance

20

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 21: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

EI-2

APPENDIX 8

RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION

City File Number C04W10010

21

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 22: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

BI-22 Aldunate Paul

From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM

To Aldunate Paul

Cc Hataml Hamid

Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010

Hi Paul

Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know

Regards

HH

Our comments are as follows

1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the

SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1

2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands

and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)

b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace

c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands

bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet

meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including

bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 23: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through

wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor

3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events

4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation

5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)

6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas

7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =

172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1

b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas

c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond

d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR

e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify

8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 24: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities

9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following

o Water balance criteria for the site

o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details

10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the

FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise

o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)

o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment

o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins

o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer

o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field

bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south

bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas

11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south

12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek

13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 25: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional

floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm

14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland

o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction

o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to

capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland

15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that

o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 26: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building

Date October 92013

To Anthony D Magnone

From Rick Conard

RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park

I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario

bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)

bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)

Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the

residential use

It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA

I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449

Regards

Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 27: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

91-2^

Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport

Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario

Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture

401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7

Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca

September 19 2013

Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond

Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)

The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report

Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me

Sincerely

-2-Jsoj^^ K

Sarah Roe

Archaeology Review Officer

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 28: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

pound1-2 Aldunate Paul

From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul

Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar

Michelle

have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise

Review

Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein

Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands

However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply

Proxy Sites

For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest

3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner

General Comments

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 29: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by

The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated

through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and

therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future

TIS Comments

1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School

2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence

3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report

4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop

5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report

6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls

7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report

Regards

Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

905-874-2540

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 30: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

Bi-SO

Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Development Proposal Comments bramptonca

File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013

Plan of

SubdivisionCondominium

GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073

Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West

SPA 45 Credit Valley

Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park

Status Public meeting

Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal

Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared

Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff

Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure

Roads

The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)

Action Required NO

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 31: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

B41

Transit

The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)

Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016

The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit

Action Required YES

Schools

School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application

Action Required NO

Emergency Services

The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed

Action Required NO

Development Allocation Status

Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application

Action Required NO

Cost Sharing Agreements

Not applicable

Action Required NO

Growth Plan Compliance

In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 32: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

B-32shy

Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community

The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor

Action Required NO

Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman

Growth Management Policy Planner

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 33: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

CI-3 (

Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2

Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284

Fax 416-296-0520

March 21 2013

City Of Brampton Planning Department

2 Wellington Street West

Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2

Attention Paul Aldunate

Dear SirMadam

RE Zoning Amendment

1985 Bovaird Dr West

File No C04W10010

Bell File No 48735

Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application

A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed

We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted

If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations

Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599

Yours truly

Lina Raffoul

Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON

City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT

DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd

fiino dtMWD-OfO

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 34: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

ROGERS CABLE

February 28 2013

City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2

File C04W10010

Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc

Peel District School Board

RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection

If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457

Yours truly

Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 35: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul

From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010

RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board

C04W10010

Ward 6

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application

Regards

Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner

Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 36: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

A

EH3U eve October 25 2013

i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department

2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc

Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)

Dear Mr Aldunate

Re CVC File No OZ 13001

City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board

1985 Bovaird Drive West

Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton

CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration

The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR

Site Characteristics

The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development

Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013

The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR

Page 1 of2

Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6

Page 37: BRAMPTON *•' Planning, Design and REPORT brampton.ca ... · Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community. • The subject lands are

amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001

Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development

Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design

Conclusion

Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown

In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment

Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned

Sincere

DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc

City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson

Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton

50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8

Glen Schnarr amp Associates

Attn Jason Afonso

10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6

Peel District School Board

Attn Dave Dundas

5650 Hurontario Street

Mississauga ON L5R 1C6