REPORTBRAMPTON bull Planning Design and Development Committeebramptonca FlOWef City Committee of the Council of
The Corporation of the City of Brampton
Date October 29 2013 PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
date yuebeilt i 2QI3Files C04W10010
Subject RECOMMENDATION REPORT
Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEEL
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
(To permit the development of a secondary school and community park) 1985 Bovaird Drive West
Ward 6
Contact Allan Parsons Manager Development Services Site Plan Approvals Planning and Building Division 905-874-2063
Overview
bull This report recommends approval of an application to amend the Zoning By law to develop the subject property for a community park and a secondary school
bull The development proposal is consistent with the Official Plan policies by providing a campus of community facilities to be shared between the City of Brampton and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) that will benefit the entire community
bull The subject lands are currently owned by the City of Brampton however it is intended that the portion of lands to be used for a secondary school will be purchased by the PDSB in conformity with Councils direction to negotiate a land exchange (CW121 -2012)
bull The lands are to be developed in partnership with the Peel District School Board in order to maximize the use of the land and provide the greatest value to the community Items to be potentially shared between the school and park properties includes a running track a combination of cricket and soccer fields multi-purpose courts a skate park a walking trail and shared parking facilities
bull The proposal will achieve a well-balanced community which is consistent with the goals of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan by providing institutional and recreational uses protecting the natural environment and preserving the Citys cultural heritage resources (Andrew McCandless Plank House)
bull This report recommends specific zoning provisions in order to permit the shared use of parking facilities and to ensure the natural features are preserved
ei-oi
Recommendations
1 THAT the report from Allan Parsons Manager Planning and Infrastructure Services and Paul Aldunate Development Planner dated October 29 2013 entitled RECOMMENDATION REPORT to the Planning Design and Development Committee Meeting of November 18 2013 re Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEEL DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Ward 6 File C04W10010 be received
2 THAT Planning Design and Development Committee recommend approval of the subject application in principle and that staff be directed to prepare the appropriate documents for the consideration of City Council in general accordance with the following
21 The Zoning By-law be amended by changing the zone from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and Floodplain (F) zone with the following requirements and restrictions
a) The site specific Institutional One zone shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and
b) The site specific Institutional One zone shall have a minimum of 330 parking spaces
3 THAT prior to enactment of the Zoning By-law the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Genivar Inc shall be finalized to the satisfaction of the Region of Peel
4 THAT prior to enactment of the Zoning By-law the Functional Servicing Report prepared by SKIRA and Associates Ltd shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Chief Planning and Infrastructure Services Official in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
5 THAT prior to site plan approval the following studies and reports shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official
51 The Geotechnical Investigation Reports prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the secondary school and community park
52 The Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc
53 The Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc
54 Confirmation of the filing of a Record of Site Condition with the Ministry of Environment
55 A copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and 56 A copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system
associated with the residential use
et-gt
6 THAT the applicant shall agree in writing to the form and content of an implementing zoning by-law amendment for the subject lands
7 THAT the decision of approval for the subject application be considered null and void and a new development application be required unless a zoning by-law is passed within 18 months of the Council approval of this decision
BACKGROUND
Origin This application was submitted by Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc on February 6 2013 on behalf of the Peel District School Board
Date of Public Meeting The public meeting for this application was held on Monday April 8 2013 There were no members of the public in attendance
Planning Area The subject lands are located at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive within Sub Areas 1 amp 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan A Block Plan was approved for this area in September 2004 The Block Plan designates a community park a public secondary school and a portion of a minor collector road (Elbern Markell Drive) for the lands subject to the application (see Appendix 5) As a result of discussions between both the City and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) the location of the community park and secondary school as shown on that approved Block Plan have been switched Their new locations will maximize the use of the lands to meet the PDSBs needs and will also implement the Citys urban design objectives by framing the highly visible intersection of Bovaird Drive West and Elbern Markell Drive with a well-designed school
Background On May 9 2012 City Council authorized staff to negotiate land exchange between the City and the PDSB to facilitate the development of a community park and a public secondary school at the south-east corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive (CW121-2012)
The PDSB is intending to acquire approximately 67 ha (165 ac) of the 20 ha (50 ac) of land currently owned by the City of Brampton for a secondary school which is programmed to be opened in September 2016 In order to develop the lands the PDSB has submitted an application to amend the Zoning By-Law
The application also proposes to rezone the remaining 13 hectares (32 acres) of the subject property that is to remain in City ownership which is located south of the proposed secondary school for a community park Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application because the property line distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands has yet to be finalized In addition the secondary school and community park are proposing a reduced parking rate for their shared parking facility
bullbull
ei-H
The minimum required parking spaces will be included in the implementing zoning by law
Proposal The PDSB is proposing to build a 3-storey public secondary school for the accommodation of approximately 1500 students on the northerly half of the subject lands The preliminary site plan (Map 1) shows a 3-storey school building with a gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 19318 m2 (207938 ft2) and 330 on-site parking spaces to be shared between the school (160 parking spaces) and community park (170 parking spaces)
The concept site plan that is submitted by the PDSB proposes four vehicular access points along the future Elbern Markell Drive (Collector Road) The northerly two access points are meant to provide for school bus drop-off and parking for the school The third and fourth southerly access points are meant to provide full moves access to both the school and the Citys recreational facility These details however may be subject to change through the required site plan approval process
The lands along the western edge of the property will be preserved as valleyland The Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources is proposed to remain in its current location under City ownership for future restoration and adaptive reuse
MAP 1 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN
BOVAIRD ORNE mccandless farm 1
heritage property
V raquo
v
I HELPORT
DEVELOPMENTS
City of Brampton Andrew mccandless park
II
gi-s~
Property Description and Surrounding Land Use
The subject lands have the following characteristics
diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection
diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)
diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road
diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources
The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP
follows
North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)
South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park
East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial
West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range
pound|-U
PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application
Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6
Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy
A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required
The proposed development represents good planning
Respectfully submitted GPO
Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building
Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pound1-1shy
APPENDICES
Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract
Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map
Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract
Append x - Existing Land Use Map
Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3
Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis
Append x - Public Meeting
Append x - Results of Application Circulation
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON
I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA
CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND
RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA
AREA
APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
ei-oi
Recommendations
1 THAT the report from Allan Parsons Manager Planning and Infrastructure Services and Paul Aldunate Development Planner dated October 29 2013 entitled RECOMMENDATION REPORT to the Planning Design and Development Committee Meeting of November 18 2013 re Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEEL DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Ward 6 File C04W10010 be received
2 THAT Planning Design and Development Committee recommend approval of the subject application in principle and that staff be directed to prepare the appropriate documents for the consideration of City Council in general accordance with the following
21 The Zoning By-law be amended by changing the zone from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and Floodplain (F) zone with the following requirements and restrictions
a) The site specific Institutional One zone shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and
b) The site specific Institutional One zone shall have a minimum of 330 parking spaces
3 THAT prior to enactment of the Zoning By-law the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Genivar Inc shall be finalized to the satisfaction of the Region of Peel
4 THAT prior to enactment of the Zoning By-law the Functional Servicing Report prepared by SKIRA and Associates Ltd shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Chief Planning and Infrastructure Services Official in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
5 THAT prior to site plan approval the following studies and reports shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official
51 The Geotechnical Investigation Reports prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the secondary school and community park
52 The Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc
53 The Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc
54 Confirmation of the filing of a Record of Site Condition with the Ministry of Environment
55 A copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and 56 A copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system
associated with the residential use
et-gt
6 THAT the applicant shall agree in writing to the form and content of an implementing zoning by-law amendment for the subject lands
7 THAT the decision of approval for the subject application be considered null and void and a new development application be required unless a zoning by-law is passed within 18 months of the Council approval of this decision
BACKGROUND
Origin This application was submitted by Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc on February 6 2013 on behalf of the Peel District School Board
Date of Public Meeting The public meeting for this application was held on Monday April 8 2013 There were no members of the public in attendance
Planning Area The subject lands are located at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive within Sub Areas 1 amp 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan A Block Plan was approved for this area in September 2004 The Block Plan designates a community park a public secondary school and a portion of a minor collector road (Elbern Markell Drive) for the lands subject to the application (see Appendix 5) As a result of discussions between both the City and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) the location of the community park and secondary school as shown on that approved Block Plan have been switched Their new locations will maximize the use of the lands to meet the PDSBs needs and will also implement the Citys urban design objectives by framing the highly visible intersection of Bovaird Drive West and Elbern Markell Drive with a well-designed school
Background On May 9 2012 City Council authorized staff to negotiate land exchange between the City and the PDSB to facilitate the development of a community park and a public secondary school at the south-east corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive (CW121-2012)
The PDSB is intending to acquire approximately 67 ha (165 ac) of the 20 ha (50 ac) of land currently owned by the City of Brampton for a secondary school which is programmed to be opened in September 2016 In order to develop the lands the PDSB has submitted an application to amend the Zoning By-Law
The application also proposes to rezone the remaining 13 hectares (32 acres) of the subject property that is to remain in City ownership which is located south of the proposed secondary school for a community park Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application because the property line distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands has yet to be finalized In addition the secondary school and community park are proposing a reduced parking rate for their shared parking facility
bullbull
ei-H
The minimum required parking spaces will be included in the implementing zoning by law
Proposal The PDSB is proposing to build a 3-storey public secondary school for the accommodation of approximately 1500 students on the northerly half of the subject lands The preliminary site plan (Map 1) shows a 3-storey school building with a gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 19318 m2 (207938 ft2) and 330 on-site parking spaces to be shared between the school (160 parking spaces) and community park (170 parking spaces)
The concept site plan that is submitted by the PDSB proposes four vehicular access points along the future Elbern Markell Drive (Collector Road) The northerly two access points are meant to provide for school bus drop-off and parking for the school The third and fourth southerly access points are meant to provide full moves access to both the school and the Citys recreational facility These details however may be subject to change through the required site plan approval process
The lands along the western edge of the property will be preserved as valleyland The Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources is proposed to remain in its current location under City ownership for future restoration and adaptive reuse
MAP 1 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN
BOVAIRD ORNE mccandless farm 1
heritage property
V raquo
v
I HELPORT
DEVELOPMENTS
City of Brampton Andrew mccandless park
II
gi-s~
Property Description and Surrounding Land Use
The subject lands have the following characteristics
diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection
diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)
diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road
diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources
The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP
follows
North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)
South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park
East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial
West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range
pound|-U
PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application
Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6
Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy
A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required
The proposed development represents good planning
Respectfully submitted GPO
Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building
Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pound1-1shy
APPENDICES
Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract
Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map
Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract
Append x - Existing Land Use Map
Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3
Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis
Append x - Public Meeting
Append x - Results of Application Circulation
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON
I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA
CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND
RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA
AREA
APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
et-gt
6 THAT the applicant shall agree in writing to the form and content of an implementing zoning by-law amendment for the subject lands
7 THAT the decision of approval for the subject application be considered null and void and a new development application be required unless a zoning by-law is passed within 18 months of the Council approval of this decision
BACKGROUND
Origin This application was submitted by Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc on February 6 2013 on behalf of the Peel District School Board
Date of Public Meeting The public meeting for this application was held on Monday April 8 2013 There were no members of the public in attendance
Planning Area The subject lands are located at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive within Sub Areas 1 amp 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan A Block Plan was approved for this area in September 2004 The Block Plan designates a community park a public secondary school and a portion of a minor collector road (Elbern Markell Drive) for the lands subject to the application (see Appendix 5) As a result of discussions between both the City and the Peel District School Board (PDSB) the location of the community park and secondary school as shown on that approved Block Plan have been switched Their new locations will maximize the use of the lands to meet the PDSBs needs and will also implement the Citys urban design objectives by framing the highly visible intersection of Bovaird Drive West and Elbern Markell Drive with a well-designed school
Background On May 9 2012 City Council authorized staff to negotiate land exchange between the City and the PDSB to facilitate the development of a community park and a public secondary school at the south-east corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive (CW121-2012)
The PDSB is intending to acquire approximately 67 ha (165 ac) of the 20 ha (50 ac) of land currently owned by the City of Brampton for a secondary school which is programmed to be opened in September 2016 In order to develop the lands the PDSB has submitted an application to amend the Zoning By-Law
The application also proposes to rezone the remaining 13 hectares (32 acres) of the subject property that is to remain in City ownership which is located south of the proposed secondary school for a community park Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application because the property line distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands has yet to be finalized In addition the secondary school and community park are proposing a reduced parking rate for their shared parking facility
bullbull
ei-H
The minimum required parking spaces will be included in the implementing zoning by law
Proposal The PDSB is proposing to build a 3-storey public secondary school for the accommodation of approximately 1500 students on the northerly half of the subject lands The preliminary site plan (Map 1) shows a 3-storey school building with a gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 19318 m2 (207938 ft2) and 330 on-site parking spaces to be shared between the school (160 parking spaces) and community park (170 parking spaces)
The concept site plan that is submitted by the PDSB proposes four vehicular access points along the future Elbern Markell Drive (Collector Road) The northerly two access points are meant to provide for school bus drop-off and parking for the school The third and fourth southerly access points are meant to provide full moves access to both the school and the Citys recreational facility These details however may be subject to change through the required site plan approval process
The lands along the western edge of the property will be preserved as valleyland The Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources is proposed to remain in its current location under City ownership for future restoration and adaptive reuse
MAP 1 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN
BOVAIRD ORNE mccandless farm 1
heritage property
V raquo
v
I HELPORT
DEVELOPMENTS
City of Brampton Andrew mccandless park
II
gi-s~
Property Description and Surrounding Land Use
The subject lands have the following characteristics
diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection
diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)
diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road
diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources
The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP
follows
North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)
South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park
East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial
West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range
pound|-U
PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application
Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6
Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy
A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required
The proposed development represents good planning
Respectfully submitted GPO
Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building
Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pound1-1shy
APPENDICES
Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract
Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map
Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract
Append x - Existing Land Use Map
Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3
Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis
Append x - Public Meeting
Append x - Results of Application Circulation
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON
I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA
CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND
RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA
AREA
APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
bullbull
ei-H
The minimum required parking spaces will be included in the implementing zoning by law
Proposal The PDSB is proposing to build a 3-storey public secondary school for the accommodation of approximately 1500 students on the northerly half of the subject lands The preliminary site plan (Map 1) shows a 3-storey school building with a gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 19318 m2 (207938 ft2) and 330 on-site parking spaces to be shared between the school (160 parking spaces) and community park (170 parking spaces)
The concept site plan that is submitted by the PDSB proposes four vehicular access points along the future Elbern Markell Drive (Collector Road) The northerly two access points are meant to provide for school bus drop-off and parking for the school The third and fourth southerly access points are meant to provide full moves access to both the school and the Citys recreational facility These details however may be subject to change through the required site plan approval process
The lands along the western edge of the property will be preserved as valleyland The Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources is proposed to remain in its current location under City ownership for future restoration and adaptive reuse
MAP 1 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN
BOVAIRD ORNE mccandless farm 1
heritage property
V raquo
v
I HELPORT
DEVELOPMENTS
City of Brampton Andrew mccandless park
II
gi-s~
Property Description and Surrounding Land Use
The subject lands have the following characteristics
diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection
diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)
diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road
diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources
The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP
follows
North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)
South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park
East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial
West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range
pound|-U
PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application
Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6
Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy
A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required
The proposed development represents good planning
Respectfully submitted GPO
Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building
Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pound1-1shy
APPENDICES
Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract
Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map
Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract
Append x - Existing Land Use Map
Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3
Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis
Append x - Public Meeting
Append x - Results of Application Circulation
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON
I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA
CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND
RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA
AREA
APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
gi-s~
Property Description and Surrounding Land Use
The subject lands have the following characteristics
diams are located at 1985 Bovaird Drive West south east of the Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West intersection
diams have a site area of approximately 20 hectares (50 acres)
diams have a frontage of 300 metres on Bovaird Drive and approximately 600 metres on Mississauga Road
diams currently contains an existing vacant dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A heritage resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources
The surrounding land uses are as MAP 2 - LOCATION MAP
follows
North Bovaird Drive beyond which are lands currently subject to a rezoning application for a District Retail Commercial development submitted by Mattamy and North American Realty Acquisition Corporation (File C04W11010)
South Valleyland and agricultural lands that are subject to a plan of subdivision (File C04W09004) that is draft approved for low density residential uses an elementary school a future stormwater management pond and neighbourhood park
East Lands currently approved for additional community park the extension of Elbern Markell Drive low density residential and convenience commercial
West Mississauga Road beyond which are a gas station and a golf course practice range
pound|-U
PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application
Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6
Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy
A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required
The proposed development represents good planning
Respectfully submitted GPO
Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building
Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pound1-1shy
APPENDICES
Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract
Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map
Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract
Append x - Existing Land Use Map
Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3
Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis
Append x - Public Meeting
Append x - Results of Application Circulation
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON
I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA
CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND
RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA
AREA
APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
pound|-U
PLANNING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
The public meeting was held on April 8 2013 and there were no members of the public that spoke in reference to this application
Subject to the fulfillment of the conditions within this Report the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Citys Strategic Plan and it conforms to the Open Space and Residential designation in the Official Plan The designations of the Secondary Plan are also maintained details in this regard are included in the Detailed Planning Analysis (Appendix 5) The recommended zoning by-law amendments outlined in Recommendation 3 are acceptable in principle
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation of valleyland is appropriate for the Block Plan and will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community For a full planning analysis please see the Detailed Planning Analysis Section found in Appendix 6
Developing the lands in partnership with the Peel District School Board will maximize the benefits of the land and will provide shared recreational facilities and parking for residents and students to enjoy
A typical condition of development approval is for the owner to enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure their obligations are met however since these lands are to be owned by two public agencies (Peel District School Board and the City of Brampton) a development agreement is not required
The proposed development represents good planning
Respectfully submitted GPO
Dan Kraszewski MCIP RPP Date IMF Senior Executive Director Planning and Building
Authored by Paul Aldunate Development Planner MPL MCIP RPP Michelle Gervais Development Planner MCIP RPP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pound1-1shy
APPENDICES
Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract
Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map
Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract
Append x - Existing Land Use Map
Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3
Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis
Append x - Public Meeting
Append x - Results of Application Circulation
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON
I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA
CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND
RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA
AREA
APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
pound1-1shy
APPENDICES
Append x - Official Plan (Schedule A General Land Use Designations) Extract
Appendx - Secondary Plan Land Use Map
Append x - Existing Zoning Plan Extract
Append x - Existing Land Use Map
Append x - Block Plan for Sub-Areas 1 and 3
Append x - Detailed Planning Analysis
Append x - Public Meeting
Append x - Results of Application Circulation
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON
I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA
CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND
RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA
AREA
APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE A (GENERAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS) OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN N-W BRAMPTON
I I SUBJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT bullbull OPEN SPACE AREA
CORRIDOR SPECIAL LAND
RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION USE POLICY AREA
AREA
APPENDIX 1bull BRAMPTON OFFICIAL PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromptonco FlOWer City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
3 Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
cc
SUBJECT LANDS ehlt
EXTRACT FROM SCHEDULE SP45(A) OF THE DOCUMENT KNOWN AS THE CREDIT VALLEY SECONDARY PLAN
_rss_
RESIDENTIAL
Low Density 2
Medium Density
COMMERCIAL
Convenience Commercial
INSTITUTIONAL
Public Secondary School
Secondary Plan Boundary
OPEN SPACE
Primary Valleyland
Secondary Valleyland
Terrestrial Features
m Community Park
Potential Stormwater Management Ponds
INFRASTRUCTURE
Highway Major Arterial Roads Collector Roads
APPENDIX 2H BRAMPTON SECONDARY PLAN DESIGNATIONSbromPton(fl FlowerCity GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 02 07 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
11
1892
R2A
| | SUBJECT LAND COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL FLOODPLAIN
RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE
APPENDIX 3fH BRAMPTON jsectf ZONING DESIGNATIONS
bramptonco Flower City GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Peel District School Board 50 100
Drawn By CJK Metres Date 2013 02 07 CITY FILE C04W10010
1314
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
SUBJECT LANDrzz]
bull BRAMPTON bmmploncn Fl0Wei City PLANNING DESIGN amp DEVELOPMENT
Drawn By CJK Date 2013 02 07
OPEN SPACE O Andrew McCandless Air Photo Date Spring 2012 Plank House
APPENDIX 4 - AIR PHOTO GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC
Peel District School Board
CITY FILE C04W10010
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
EHshySUBJECT
LANDS
BOVAIRD DRIVE
LEGEND
RESIDENTIALbull
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT1 bull
m SCHOOL
m PARK
m VALLEY EH HERITAGE
bull WOODLOT GHU PLACE OF WORSHIP
COMMERCIAL FavI area subject to TERTIARY PLAN
APPENDIX 5mBRAMPTON PORTION OF APPROVED BLOCK PLAN - SUB AREA 1 amp 3 bfomptanca FlOWerCty GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Peel District School Board
Date 2013 03 14 Drawn By CJK CITY FILE C04W10010
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
ampH3
APPENDIX 6
DETAILED PLANNING ANALYSIS City File Number C04W10010
Provincial Policy Statement The subject application is consistent with matters of provincial interest as identified in the Provincial Policy Statement Policy 161 states that planning for infrastructure and public servicefacilities shall be integrated with planning for growth so that these are available to meet current and projected needs The secondary school and the community park were designated for the south east cornerof Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as part of the Secondary Planning review process which was adopted by Council in 2002 The Block Plan for Sub Areas land 3 refined the land-use pattern in more detail and also shows the community park and secondary school on the subject lands The Block Plan was approved in 2004
Section 163 of the Provincial Policy Statement also states where feasible public service facilities should be co-located to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration In this case the school site and the park have been put together in order for the City and the school board to be able to enter into a joint use agreement to share facilities such as parking and the sports fields
Strategic Plan The proposed uses and implementing zoning by-law are consistentwith the Citys Strategic Plan in particular the Protecting Our Environment Enhancing Our Community and Community Lifestyle goals The valleyland will be protected by keeping development setback at an appropriate distance and zoning the valleylands as floodplain which prohibits development The Andrew McCandless Plank House a significant heritage resource is also being preserved and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Heritage Act The proposed recreational open space and educational amenities will support an appropriate community lifestyle for residents in this area of the City
Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Open Space and Residential In addition according to Schedule E - Major Recreational Open Space a portion of the subject lands are designated as Community Park Complementary uses to residential uses such as schools and parks are permitted uses according to the Official Plan
The Official Plan also recognizes that school sites contribute to the overall provision of recreation open space in a neighbourhood The Official Plan promotes wherever feasible for the City to arrange with school boards for the shared use of buildings sports fields and parking facilities Shared facilities offer students and area residents greater access to recreational and open space facilities
Utilizing the subject lands for a secondary school community park the preservation of a heritage resource and the conservation ofvalleyland will contribute towards achieving a well-balanced and complete community As such an amendment to the Official Plan is not required
13
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
ei-N
Secondary Plan The subject lands are designated as Community Park Public Secondary School Stormwater Management Pond Low Density 2 Residential Medium Density Residential and Primary Valleyland in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
Although the Secondary Plan shows a Low Density 2 Residential and Medium Density Residential designation on part of the subject lands the pattern of land-use shown on Schedule SP45 (a) is schematic and can be adjusted through the Block Plan approval process Through the block plan approval process for Sub-Areas 1 and 3 the limits ofdevelopment for the valleyland which are part of the subject lands were further refined through the Environmental Implementation Report and as a result the area of valleyland slightly increased Therefore the boundaries ofthe land use designations were slightly adjusted resulting in the removal of the residential land use designations on the subject lands These types ofadjustments are permitted bythe Secondary Plan when they are based on the further examination and refinement ofenvironmental features
Furthermore the City has been working with the PDSB to determine the facility layout and access for the proposed secondary school Through this coordinated effort itwas mutually agreed upon between City staff and the PDSB that the secondary school would occupy the north end of the subject lands and the community park would be located within the southerly portion of the subject lands Schedule SP45 (a) to the Credit Valley Secondary Plan designates the north half of the subject lands as Community Park and the south half as Public Secondary School Although the location of the community park and secondary school have been switched the intent of the Secondary Plan is maintained because a community park and public secondary school are being developed togetheras shared community facility An amendment to the Secondary Plan is not required given the flexibility provisions that exist in the Secondary Plan
ZoningThe subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) by By-Law 270-2004 as amended An amendment to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed secondary school Forthis reason the PDSB is proposing an amendment to the Zoning By-law to change the zoning from Agricultural (A) to a site specific Institutional One zone and a Floodplain (F) zone
Although a public facility owned by the City of Brampton is permitted in any zone the community park has been included as part of this application and will also be zoned with a site specific Institutional One zone because the final property lines distinguishing the PDSB lands from the Citys lands have yet to be finalized
14
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
em^t
The site specific provisions of the zone will state that the lands shall be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes and to provide a minimum parking requirement of 330 parking spaces This will permit parking to be shared between the park and secondary school which is otherwise not permitted by the Zoning By-law The 330 parking spaces that are being proposed is lower than what is required by zoning for facilities of this size (338 spaces) but is determined to be appropriate for a combined facility because the community park and secondary school will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods
Urban Design The Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines for the Block Plan were approved through the block plan process for sub-areas 1 and 3 The Guidelines help to ensure that elements such as community structure open space system street network streetscapes edges and gateways and site planning and built form are consistent with the vision and civic design objectives of the Citys Development Design Guidelines
Locating the secondary school on the northern portion of the subject lands along the Bovaird Drive frontage will provide building massing at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive and reinforce the schools focal significance within the community The location ofthe secondaryschool at the intersection is consistent with the Secondary Plan which states Community institutional sites shall be located at the intersection of primary streets and shall address the streetscape of both street frontages The primary streetscape shall maintain visibility to institutional buildings to establish their landmark status The location and site development of institutional facilities will encourage axial views to them from the surrounding urban fabric
The proposed secondary school and community park will be required to adhere to the design objectives of the approved Community of Spring Valley Landscape and Architectural Guidelines In addition site plan approval is required for both the secondary school and community park It is noted that the PDSB intends to design their secondary school with architecture that is similar to the David Suzuki Secondary School located at the northwest corner of Chinguacousy Road and Queen Street
Environmental Issues The limits of development of the adjacent Huttonville Creek valley corridorhave been determined to the satisfaction of Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The limit of development reflects the greater of the environmental hazards of Huttonville Creek (eg Regional Storm floodplain stable top of bank etc) regulated Redside Dace Habitat (ie meander belt plus 30m) and environmental buffers
15
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
pound|~(
The City and PDSB in conjunction with another developer in the area (Helport Development) are required to coordinate the restoration and enhancement of the valley corridor to address the requirements of the Blocks 1 and 3 Environmental Implementation Report for the loss of local wetlands a small woodland and swales As well the City is working with the Region of Peel to assist in addressing the Mississauga Road encroachment in the valley corridor and the delineation of additional Redside Dace Habitat
The H1 stormwater management pond (H1 SWM Pond) located on the Bluegrass Development lands southeast ofthe subject property is programmed to service the parkschool lands along with otherdevelopments in the area The design ofthe stormwater management pond has been finalized through the Endangered Species Act regulatory process with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) The H1 SWM Pond is located in regulated habitat and a Mitigation Plan has been submitted in support of MNRs permitting process to address and compensate for any negative impacts to Redside Dace Habitat
In this regard the Ministry of Natural Resources has confirmed that they are satisfied with the proposed configuration ofthe SWM pond and have issued a permit for its construction
In addition to the FSR the following documents have been submitted
bull A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited dated December 2012 for the secondary school and the community park
bull Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting dated October 24 2012 and
bull Draft Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting July 25 2013
The Building Division is currently reviewing the environmental site assessment documents but requires further information in order to complete their review including a final and signed copy of the Phase 2 ESA and a confirmation of the filing of record of site condition with the Ministry of Environment Prior to site plan approval the above noted documents will need to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Citys Chief Building Official
Heritage On the north-west portion of the subject lands is a detached dwelling known as the Andrew McCandless Plank House which is identified as a Class A Heritage Resource in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources This Heritage Resource is not identified on the Official Plan Cultural Heritage Map or in the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
16
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
Gf-rr-
The Andrew McCandless Residence may have been constructed as early as 1829 It is constructed on a rubble stone foundation with stacked plank walls Heritage staff has informed that this house is one of the last known plank-on-plank structures in the City of Brampton and is recommending the retention of the house in its current location and the preservation of the immediate landscape elements A notice of intent to designate the property as a property of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Actwas issued to Realty Services on January 3 2013 The City is investigating potential adaptive reuse of the Andrew McCandless Plank House Uses that have been contemplated to date include
bull A Community Garden bull A Home of the Horticultural Society bull An Artist in Residence
bull A Support facility for outdoor uses
It is proposed that the Andrew McCandless Plank House will remain under the ownership of the City of Brampton when the lands to be used by the Peel District School Board are severed Since the lands are to remain under the ownership of the City the final use ofthe Andrew McCandless House can be addressed at a laterdate
AStage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment prepared by Amick Consultants Limited dated June 28 2012 has been submitted to the City and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sportfor the subject lands Following their review of the Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment the Ministry has indicated in their letter dated September 19 2013 that no archaeological sites were identified and that they have no further concerns under the Ontario Heritage Act In addition they have no concerns regarding impacts to archaeological resources for any lands within the project limits covered by the assessment
TransportationTraffic The subject property has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive Access to the secondary school and community park are proposed to be provided from Elbern Markell Drive while access to the Andrew McCandless Plank House is anticipated to be providedfrom Bovaird Drive Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel
The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road between Bovaird Drive and Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by Genivar Inc was submitted in support ofthe subject development The study has been circulated to the Citys Transportation Planning section and the Region of Peel for review The TIS included a review of the existing and future traffic conditions that surround the site an assessment of the parking
17
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
EH
requirements and the site circulation The traffic assessment concludes that a northbound left-turn lane at Elbern Markell Drive and the southerly school driveway be provided to provide safe and smooth traffic along Elbern Markel A traffic signal at Bovaird Drive and Elbern Markell Drive is not warranted but westbound and northbound left-turn lanes are recommended
The TIS also reviewed the function and location of the proposed site driveways The applicant is proposing four driveways on Elbern Markell Drive
bull One inbound only bull One exit only bull Two full moves that will be shared with the community park
The TIS concludes that all proposed driveways are expected to safely accommodate vehicles anticipated to use the site The location of the driveways will be finalized through the Citys site plan approval process for the secondary school
In terms of parking the TIS recommend that 330 parking spaces are adequate to serve the secondary school (160 parking spaces) and the community park (170 parking spaces) This is lower than the 338 parking spaces that are required bythe Zoning By lawfor such facilities However given that this is a combined facility the 330 parking spaces is deemed to appropriate because the peak operating periods for the community park and secondary school will not typically coincide
Transportation Planning staff have reviewed the TIS and have indicated that they are satisfied with the analysis completed to date on the traffic and parking assessments for the school and the community park
The Region of Peel is continuing to review the TIS Prior to enactment of the zoning by law the TIS prepared by Genivar shall be approved to the satisfaction ofthe Region of Peel
Servicing In support of the application the applicant has submitted a Functional Servicing Report (FSR) prepared by Skira and Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 This report has been reviewed by staff from the Development and Engineering Services section and the Citys Environmental Planning section
Staff have indicated that from a stormwater management perspective the FSR needs to be revised to show more detailed information to address the environmental requirements associated with the site which impacts the quantity and quality ofthe stormwater drainage into the valleylands and the associated stormwater management pond More specifically staff have indicated that the FSR does not comply with the Citys Term of Reference for FSRs and that it is not consistent with Environmental Implementation Report that was approved for Sub-Area 1 and 3 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan
18
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
em
Furthermore the report does not address water quality Low Impact Development methods Redside Dace Habitat the proposed wetland feature or sub-drainage areas Also it does not provide any recommendations for the Stormwater Management Report and how the different types of volumes (roof parking lot amp green areas) will be conveyed (swales vs pipes)
The Region of Peel has reviewed the FSR and has indicated they have no issues with the report as it relates to sanitary sewers and water distribution services These services will be available through the Helport Subdivision (21T-06-019B) To date Credit Valley Conservation has not provided any comments on the FSR but have indicated they have no objection to the application to amend the zoning by-law Detailed comments from the City of Brampton staff can be found in Appendix 8
Prior to enactment of the zoning by-law the FSR will need to be revised to the satisfaction of the Citys Engineering and Development Section in consultation with Credit Valley Conservation
19
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
poundK2lts
APPENDIX 7
PUBLIC MEETING - April 8th 2013 City File Number C04W10010
Members Present
Regional Councillor P Palleschi -Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V Dhillon - Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor E Moore - Wards 1 and 5 Regional Councillor J Sanderson - Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G Miles - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S Hames - Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City CouncillorG Gibson - Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J Hutton - Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B Callahan - Wards 3 and 4
Staff Present Planning Design and Development Department
D Kraszewski Acting Commissioner Planning Design and Development P Snape Acting Director Planning and Land Development Services M Won Director Engineering and Development Services H Zbogar Acting Director Planning Policy and Growth Management J Hogan Planning Project Manager G Bailey Development Planner A Dear-Muldoon Development Planner
Corporate Services Department
J Zingaro Legal Services E Evans Deputy Clerk S Danton Legislative Coordinator S Pacheco Legislative Coordinator
Results of the Public Meeting
A special meeting of the Planning Design and Development Committee was held on Monday April 8 2013 in the Council Chambers 4th Floor 2 Wellington Street West Brampton Ontario commencing at 700 pm with respect to the subject application Notices of this meeting were sent to property owners within 900 metres of the subject lands in accordance with the Planning Actand City Council procedures There were no members of the public that were in attendance
20
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
EI-2
APPENDIX 8
RESULTS OF APPLICATION CIRCULATION
City File Number C04W10010
21
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
BI-22 Aldunate Paul
From Jorgenson Susan Sent 20131009 1124 AM
To Aldunate Paul
Cc Hataml Hamid
Subject FW Functional Servicing Report - prepared by SKIRA amp Associates Ltd dated September 12 2013 - in support of a Zoning Application File C04W10010
Hi Paul
Here are the comments from Environmental Engineering and EnvironmentalPlanning on the FSR prepared by SKIRA Ifyou need any further information please let me know
Regards
HH
Our comments are as follows
1 General - the FSR has identified a maximum 45 hectares of land that will be directed to the
SWM Pond HI However as per Comment 7 below this area of land is not substantiated in the Schaeffefs report for SWM Pond H1 Furthermore the City and PDSB have to address environmental requirements on site andor in the valley corridor (ie 1 km swales and a wetland - refer to Comment 2(c)) which willrequire clean flows from the Campus lands (ie school roof sports track and playing fields) Therefore pending grading constraints and or excess flows these contributing green flows should not be directed to the SWM Pond H1
2 Sec 20 Site Area Information a Please identify and discuss the environmental features of the CityPDSB campus lands
and Huttonville Creek valley in the FSR such as the protected watercourse and terrestrial features This can be addressed using the latest Blocks 1 amp3 Environmental Implementation Report March 2005 (EIR)
b Please note that in 2013 MNR has confirmed that Huttonville Creek provides Occupied Habitat for Redside Dace
c The FSR should also include the following overview of EIR recommendations that are pertinent to the Campus Lands
bull As per the Blocks 1 amp3 EIR Figure 623a and Table 741 and discussions with CVC and MNR the Cityand PDSB need to address the replication of terrestrial featuresfunctions associated with the headwater swales wet
meadows and terrestrial communities on these lands including
bull SV3- 340m of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through new swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
pound1-23 bull TF9 - 029 small wet meadows - functional loss to be mitigated through
wetland creation at south end of Community Park and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
bull SV4 - 700 of headwater swales - loss to be mitigated through swales in the Community ParkSchool Block and Huttonville Creek valley corridor
3 Please prepare a table showing the generated flows from each sub-drainage area during different storm events
4 Please conduct a water balance analysis to identify the required flow for any LID measures including the wetland and the bioswale Pending the available flows it would also be relevant to investigate the possibility of using collected runoff from school roof top for sport field irrigation
5 Based on Page 10 of the FSR the community park can discharge a maximum area of 172 ha to the proposed storm sewer Please provide the source for this assumption (eg EIR H1 Stormwater Management Pond Design)
6 Sec 60- Existing Conditions - while the entire site does ultimately drain to Huttonville Creek - as per Comment 2 above it should be recognized that the site runoff follows different drainage paths - whether overland to the valley corridor directly andor via headwater drainage features ie SV3 (refer to EIR Figure 623a) Further to Comment 1 (c) the FSR will need to address the creation of swales within the Community Park School Block andor Huttonville Creek valley corridor to replicate SV3 and SV4 and to direct clean flows to these swales from areas such as rooftop and grassed areas
7 Sec 60 - Proposed Storm Drainage System a The FSR (Page 6) states that 45 ha of the site (school = 278 ha and community park =
172 ha) willdischarge storm runoff to the future storm sewer system and will be eventually treated by the proposed SWM Pond H1
b Based on the FSR prepared by Schaeffers for the H1 Pond (dated February 2011) only 337 ha (school = 122 ha and community park = 215 ha) of the site was included to size the pond which is less than 45 ha Please confirm that the proposed SWM Pond H1 has adequate capacity to provide quality erosion and quantity controls for the additional drainage areas
c Further to Bullets 1 and 2 and Comment 5 clean flows from the Building Roof and Landscaped Areas should be directed to the future swales andor created wetlands not the H1 SWM Pond
d As mentioned above the subject site included in the Schaeffers report is smaller than that provided in the FSR Therefore the allowable rates should be calculated based on Schaeffers report Please revise Pages 7 and 8 of the FSR
e Based on the FSR the subject site has a total area of 1546 ha (school = 642 ha community park = 904 ha) However Page 2 of the FSR states that the property has an area of 2208 ha Please clarify
8 Sec 60- Page 7 - the discussion of the Building Roof drainageflows should be expanded to indicate that this drainage willbe directed to the proposed Wetland located at the south end of the City Park Huttonville Creek valley corridor and or swales located in the Huttonville Creek valley corridor adjacent to the school track Please note that Figure 2 of this report identifies the potential configurations of the wetland dependent on the flows that can be directed to this
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
B-ZH future naturalarea The FSR should further qualifywhether this flow would be directed via pipe andor open swale through the City parkland the sizing of the necessary conveyance system and the implications to city park facilities
9 Page 9 of the report states that an underground recharge chamber (V8IHD) is proposed to provide quantity controls as well as infiltration of storm runoff Please clarify the following
o Water balance criteria for the site
o Sizing calculations for the recharge chamber o Drainage contributing the chamber o Conceptual design of the chamber such as cross section details
10Figure 2 provides a conceptual grading and drainage plan for the proposed development o The drainage areas are not consistent between the FSR and Figure 2 For example the
FSR indicates a school area of 278 ha whereas Figure 2 shows an area of243 ha Please revise
o Based on the figure a portion of the school and community park drainage is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer Please revise the figure and FSR to clearly show the breakdown of drainage areas and proposed drainage pattern (ie flow direction and outlet)
o Please add a section in the FSR to describe the proposed minor and major drainage patterns such as outlets for the school site (64 ha) and the community park facility (904 ha) along with labels for each sub catchment
o Catchbasins are proposed to collect storm runoff from the sub-catchment Please clearly illustrate the proposed grading on the figure and show how stormwater is conveyed to the proposed catchbasins
o Based on the figure there are no catch basins for the eastern portion of the community park located along Elbern Markell Drive Please clarify how storm runoff is conveyed to the proposed storm sewer
o Please clarify the receiving water for drainage areas south of the building and adjacent to the sport field
bull If these areas are conveyed to the proposed storm sewer system please show how water from these areas is conveyed to the sewer as the site has a slope towards the south
bull If these areas are not conveyed to the storm sewer please clarify the proposed SWM measures for these areas
11Page 10 of the FSR states that the minor flows (10 year flows) from 172 ha of the community park will be conveyed to Pond H1 Please clarify if major flows from this area will also be conveyed to the pond Ifso please show how water is conveyed to the pond as the site has a slope towards the south
12 Page 10 states that the remaining areas of the community park discharge to the proposed wetland and partially to the creek Please provide more details on the wetland such as sizing calculations cross sections its functions and the outlet to the creek
13As show from Figure 2 the proposed wetland is located within the Regional floodplain
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
poundr-25~ o Please clarify if the proposed wetland requires the construction of a berm o The City staff defers to CVC staff to determine if the hydraulicmodel and the Regional
floodline of the creek should be updated to reflect the proposed wetland and berm
14 Figure 2 shows a proposed swale within the community park and it discharges to the proposed wetland
o Please show how storm runoff from the community park is conveyed to the swale along with grading details and flow direction
o Please provide cross section details for the swale as well as sizing calculations o As per our previous meeting and discussion please design the bioswale system to
capture runoff from both the school block and community park block and convey it to the proposed wetland
15 Please clarify the proposed Erosion and Sediment Controls (ESC) for the subject site 16Consultant should add a declaration section stating that
o The FSR complies with the Citys latest design manual o The FSR complies with the recommendations and constraints set out in EIR o If there are any deviations from the EIR the consultant should explain his assumptions
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
BRAMPTON a-laquo ESSEitradeshybrtrade Flower City Planning and Building
Date October 92013
To Anthony D Magnone
From Rick Conard
RE City File C04W10010 Peel District Secondary School and Community Park
I have had the opportunity to review the following documentation submitted in support of the draft plan conditions for the above noted application
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed park at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Geotechnical Investigation Report dated December 2012 and prepared by VA Wood Associates Limited for the proposed Credit Valley Secondary School No 2 at the southeast corner of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive West in Brampton Ontario
bull Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated October 24 2012 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as Pt Lt 10 Con 4 WHS Ching as in RO510815 Save and Except Pt 1 PI 43R-29994 amp Save and Except Pts 2 amp 3 PI 43R-34408 (1985 Bovaird Drive West)
bull Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated July 25 2013 and prepared by G2S Environmental Consulting Inc for the site identified in the report as located on the southeast corner of Bovaird DriveWest and Mississauga Road (1985 Bovaird DriveWest)
Please provide bull a final and signed copy of the Phase II ESA bull confirmation ofthe filing ofa record ofsite condition with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) bull a copy of the MOE well decommissioning record and bull a copy of the decommissioning report for the on-site sewage disposal system associated with the
residential use
It should be noted that the proposed use of the property as institutional and parkland should be reflected in the RSC ratherthan the existing use of agricultural or other as noted in the Draft Phase II ESA
I hope that this information is adequate for your present needs Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (905) 874-2449
Regards
Rick Conard Senior Manager Inspections and Administration Planning Design and Development Building Division
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
91-2^
Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport
Mlnistere du Tourlsme de la Culture et du Sport V Ontario
Archaeology Program Unit Unite des programmes darcheologie Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture
401 Bay Street Suite 1700 401 me Bay bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A0A7 Toronto ON M7A0A7
Tel (416)314-7152 Tel (416) 314-7152 Email sarahroeontarioca Email sarahroeontarioca
September 19 2013
Mr Michael Won and Ms Sonya Drummond
Further to your letter dated May 24 2013 this Ministry has re-examined the Stage 1 -2 report for the property at 1985 Bovaird Drive West Brampton (report PIF P058-836-2012 File 21GN072)
The matter has been further reviewed and the Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport has determined that since no archaeological sites were identified we have no further concerns underourmandate underthe Ontario Heritage Act In addition we have no concerns regarding impacts toarchaeological resources for any ofthe lands within the project limits covered by this report
Should you require any further information regarding this matter please feel free to contact me
Sincerely
-2-Jsoj^^ K
Sarah Roe
Archaeology Review Officer
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
pound1-2 Aldunate Paul
From Gervais Michelle Sent 20130813 1020 AM To Aldunate Paul
Subject FW School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
From Mclntyre Scott Sent 20130503 912 AM To Gervais Michelle Subject School TIS - Elbern Markell Drive Bovaird - C04W10010 - Genivar
Michelle
have not hadan opportunity to discuss these comments with Brad But Ido notforesee any issues Ifyou require more definitive comments please advise
Review
Our office has completed a review of the April 2013 TIS completed by Genivar for the above noted Zoning Amendment application Comments are found herein
Thisstudy presents a strong argument regarding the forecasted parking demand based on a Peel District School Board 2008 secondary schools parking study The report identifies a secondary school average peak demand of0914 parking stalls per100 m2 ofGFA which is below the City of Brampton parking requirement of 15 stalls per100 m2 ofGFA The 2008 Secondary Schools Parking Study does not include reference or incorporate parking facilities shared with adjacent parks which is key to the Credit Valley2 school location However the proposed park and the adjacent CreditValley 2 school location will not typically operate with simultaneous peak periods Based on this data it is reasonable to say that the parking supply provided by the proposed school and park will meet demands
However at this point in time no study has been carried out on potential proxy sites with shared parking facilities And the season to carry out such studies is months in the future Therefore due to deadlines my conclusion is that the applicant is to be required to shadow in additional parking in the event that the future demand exceeds the parking supply
Proxy Sites
For future considerations the list below consist of potential proxy sites for this TIS 1 Teramoto Park - Queen and Ching NW corner 2 Batsman Park - Father Tobin between Bramalea and Fernforest
3 Torbram amp Sandalwood Site - SE corner
General Comments
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
B-r 1 All transportation matters relating to Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road will be commented on by
The Region of Peel 2 EA inquiriesconcerns with regards to Bovaird Driveand Mississauga Road are to be coordinated
through the Region of Peel (Neal Smith) 3 The City of Brampton contact for the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road EAs is Compton Bobb 4 Other regional inquiries are to be coordinated through Sean Carrick (Region of Peel) 5 As of this point in time (April 29 2013) the Region of Peel has not received this TIS for review and
therefore Regional comments are not expected in the immediate future
TIS Comments
1 Opening page - stipulate the school grades available Do not simply state that this will be a Secondary School
2 Opening page - the letter of introduction stipulates that traffic signal will not be justified Please specify the intersection within that same sentence
3 Section 471 (Pg 31) - First sentence top of page - The queuing analysis indicates that the estimatedexceed available storage length Stipulate the specific intersection within this sentence Apply this throughout the report
4 Section 721 (Pg 57) - School Bus Operations - Modifications will be required to accommodate additional school buses onsite Such as increasing the length of the bus bays within the bus loop
5 Section 731 (Pg 79) - The parking requirements based on the City of Brampton parking requirements as per the City zoning bylaw are to be mentioned within the body of the report
6 Section 731 (Pg 79) - Weekend parking requirements are to be included within section 731 However it appears the parking demand of 588 vehicles per field (as per 4th edition of ITE parking generation) plus the demand for tennis courts can be accommodated by the proposed 330 stalls
7 Appendix L- The Secondary Schools parking study report stipulates that parking demand has deceased with the elimination of Grade 13 and the introduction of graduated licensing This statement should be included and justified within the body of the report
Regards
Transportation Planning Analyst Engineering amp Development Services Planning Design amp Development 2 Wellington St W City of Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
905-874-2540
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
Bi-SO
Flower City GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Development Proposal Comments bramptonca
File No C04W10010 Date April 24 2013
Plan of
SubdivisionCondominium
GLEN SCHNARR amp ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED - PEELApplicant
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Development Planner Gervais Michelle - 905-874-2073
Location 1985 Bovaird Drive West
SPA 45 Credit Valley
Application to Amend the Zoning By-LawTo permit theProposal development of a Secondary School and Community Park
Status Public meeting
Key Infrastructure provided by the Proposal
Notes These comments are based on the best information available to Growth Management staff at the time they were prepared
Items shown in bold require action andor follow up with Growth Management staff
Other City Departments andor external agencies should be contacted as appropriate regarding potential issues related to the provision of infrastructure
Roads
The subject site has frontage along Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and the future Elbern Markell Drive (with access to be provided off of this latter road) Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive are majorarterial roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel The future Elbern Markell Drive will be a collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton The Regions 2013-2031 Road Program Funding map indicates that Mississauga Road south of Bovaird Drive to Queen Street is to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes in 2023 Mississauga Road north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2017 (and further widened to 6 lanes between Bovaird Drive to Sandalwood Parkway in 2027) Bovaird Drive east of Mississauga Road to east of Creditview Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2014 (and further widened to 6 lanes in 2023) Bovaird Drive west of Mississauga Road to Winston Churchill Road is to be widened from 2 to 4 lanes in 2023 (and the section between Mississauga Road and a potential North South Transportation Corridor further widened to 6 lanes in 2031)
Action Required NO
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
B41
Transit
The subject site is not currently served by any Brampton Transit routes The closest major transit stops (routes 9 29 and 56) and GO Transit rail and bus service are located at the Mount Pleasant GO Station (located approximately one kilometre from the subject site)
Brampton Transits 2013 Annual Service Plan does not provide for service proximate to the subject site The subject site will be served by Zum Bus Rapid Transit service (Queen West Corridor) scheduled to begin operation in 2016
The School Board will need to discuss transit service options with Brampton Transit
Action Required YES
Schools
School capacity will not be affected by this institutional application
Action Required NO
Emergency Services
The subject site is served by fire station 210 (10530 Creditview Road) The fire station is located approximately 48 kilometres from the subject site (via Sandalwood Parkway Brisdale Drive and Bovaird Drive) This distance will be shortened to approximately 23 kilometres once James Potter Road north of Bovaird Drive to Creditview Road is constructed
Action Required NO
Development Allocation Status
Development allocation does not apply to this institutional application
Action Required NO
Cost Sharing Agreements
Not applicable
Action Required NO
Growth Plan Compliance
In June 2010 Brampton City Council adopted an amendment to the 2006 Official Plan to conform to the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment OPA 2006-043) This amendment is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
B-32shy
Section 327 (Communities) in the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment states that new communities and new development within existing communities shall be planned to be Complete Communities where Complete Communities meet peoples needs for daily living through an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs local services a full range of housing and community infrastructure including affordable housing schools recreation and open space for residents The proposed secondary school contributes to making the area in which it is located a Complete Community
The subject site is located per Schedule 1of the Growth Plan Official Plan Amendment on a Primary Intensification Corridor Intensification Corridors are oneofthe Citys key intensification areas planned to accommodate significant growth through higher residential and employment densities supporting higher order transit service Intensification corridors will accommodate a mix of residential office institutional employment and commercial development which supports the transit focus of these areas To accomplish the intended vision for the Citys intensification corridors higher order uses which enhance the use of transit and encourage walkability shall be promoted Particular attention should be given to streetscape improvements to create a pedestrian-friendly environment Development within Primary Intensification Corridors shall be designed to achieve a floor space index of 15 within buildings 2-10 storeys in height In my opinion the proposed secondary school is given the focal location of the school building the building heights the planned pedestrian linkages to the future residential area to the east and its location along a future higher order transit route well-suited to this Primary Intensification Corridor
Action Required NO
Comments by ^ ^ Brian Lakeman
Growth Management Policy Planner
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
CI-3 (
Bell Development amp Municipal Services Control Centre Floor 5 100 Borough Drive Scarborough Ontario M1P 4VJ2
Tel 416-296-6291 Toll-Free 1-800-743-6284
Fax 416-296-0520
March 21 2013
City Of Brampton Planning Department
2 Wellington Street West
Brampton Ontario L6Y 4R2
Attention Paul Aldunate
Dear SirMadam
RE Zoning Amendment
1985 Bovaird Dr West
File No C04W10010
Bell File No 48735
Thank you for your letter of February 26 2013 concerning the above application
A detailed review of the Zoning Amendment has been completed
We have no conditionsobjections to the above application as submitted
If there are any conflicts with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements the OwnerDeveloper shall be responsible for re-arrangements or relocations
Should you have any questions please contact Rosita Giles at 416-296shy6599
Yours truly
Lina Raffoul
Manager - Development amp Municipal Services ON
City of Brampton PLANNING DESIGN ampDEVELOPMENT
DATE ApR Q3 2013 Recd
fiino dtMWD-OfO
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
ROGERS CABLE
February 28 2013
City of Brampton Planning Design and Development Department 2 Wellington St West Brampton Ontario L6Y4R2
File C04W10010
Request for Comments Glen Schnarr amp Associates Inc
Peel District School Board
RE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Please be advised that Rogers Communications Partnership has no plant in this area No objection
If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 905-897-6457
Yours truly
Salman Siraj Mark-ups Coordinator GTAW
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
poundl~35~ Aldunate Paul
From Koops Krystina [KrystinaKoopsdpcdsborg] Sent 20130227 1101 AM To Aldunate Paul Cc Mountford Paul Subject Comments C04W10010
RE Notice of Application and Request for Comments Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Glenn Schnarr amp Associates Incorporated - Peel District School Board
C04W10010
Ward 6
The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board has reviewed the above-noted application and has no comments or objection to the further processing of this application
Regards
Krystina Koops MCIP RPP Planner
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
Phone (905) 890-0708 ext 24407 Fax (905)890-1557 E-mail krvstinakoops(5gtdpcdsborg
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
A
EH3U eve October 25 2013
i tty o( l3i Wfifl bullCity of Brampton Planning and Building Department
2 Wellington Street West RectiBrampton ON L6Y 4R2 oct 2 g arc
Attention Paul Aldunate File No Co^^iO 0 YC)
Dear Mr Aldunate
Re CVC File No OZ 13001
City File No C04W10010 Peel District School Board
1985 Bovaird Drive West
Part of Lot 10 Concession 4 WHS City of Brampton
CVC staff have reviewed the proposed application to amend the Zoning By-Law to permit a secondary school and community park at the above noted property and provide the following comments for your consideration
The property is located within Sub-Area 1 of the Credit Valley Secondary Plan and as such is subject to the Sub-Areas 1 amp 3 Environmental Implementation Report (EIR) As such any development proposed on these lands should conform to the recommendations of the approved EIR
Site Characteristics
The property contains portions of the Huttonville Creek valley corridor and as such the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 16006 and a permit from CVC is required for development
Due to the presence of the valley corridor the property contains a number of hazards including floodplain erosion (meander belt width) and slope stability CVC does not support development within hazardous lands and requires that the hazards are delineated and an additional 10m buffer is applied to form the ultimate limit of development In regards to this it should be noted that the limits of these hazards has been satisfactorily identified through a memo from the City (S Jorgenson) to CVC (J Campbell) dated April 25 2013
The property also contains small headwater drainage features Through the approved EIR it has been agreed that these features will be removed from the landscape and replicated in the form of new swales in the Community Park and School Block Through the subsequent development process (site plan) it is expected that details of the mitigation for the loss of theses features will be submitted to CVC for review and ultimate sign-off This will also include the required mitigation for the loss of features on the Helport lands as prescribed in the EIR
Page 1 of2
Credit Valley Conservation 1255 Old Deny Road Mississauga Ontario L5N 6R4 Phone (905)670-1615 Fax (905)670-2210
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
amp-ampshyOctober 252013 RE CVC OZ 13001
Endangered Species Act (ESA) It should be noted that Huttonville Creek within Sub-Area 1 is considered to be an occupied reach of Redside Dace which is an endangered species The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) has identified that significant habitat for Redside Dace is 30m from the meander belt of an occupied reach The constraints mapping as presented in the April 25 2013 memo from the City toCVC identifies the RSD setback and it is included within the limit of development
Stormwater Management (SWM) As per the approved EIR the subject lands drain to SWM facility HI on the lands to the south (Bluegrass) CVC staff are currently reviewing the details of this facility and it is likely that a permit for these works will be issued in the near future Furthermore CVC staff are in receipt of a SWM Report completed by Skira and Associates outlining how SWM will be implemented on these lands This report is currently in review and once approved will guide the detailed design
Conclusion
Based on the above the limits of development for the subject lands have been established and the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment shows the F zone generally in thearea of the hazard lands It would be preferred if the zoning more accurately reflected the limits of development however we have no major concerns with the sketch as shown
In this regard CVC staffhave no objection to the proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment
Should youhave anyquestions based on the above please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
Sincere
DorothyQf BeXtdjMCIP RPP Planner cc
City of Brampton Attn Susan Jorgenson
Ministry of Natural Resources Attn Mark Heaton
50 Bloomington Road W Aurora ON L4G3G8
Glen Schnarr amp Associates
Attn Jason Afonso
10 Kingsbridge Garden Circle Suite 700 Mississauga ON L5R3K6
Peel District School Board
Attn Dave Dundas
5650 Hurontario Street
Mississauga ON L5R 1C6
Top Related