adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

download adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

of 11

Transcript of adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    1/11

    CopyrightWILEYVCHVerlagGmbH&Co.KGaA,69469Weinheim,Germany,2010.

    SupportingInformation

    forAdv.Funct.Mater.,DOI:10.1002/adfm.201002508AMicrofluidic,ReversiblyStretchable,LargeAreaWirelessStrainSensor

    Shi Cheng* and Zhigang Wu*

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    2/11

    Submitted to

    1 1

    Electronic Supplementary Information

    Microfluidic Reversibly Stretchable Large-Area Wireless Strain

    Sensor

    Shi Cheng1,

    and Zhigang Wu2,

    1Advanced Technology, Laird Technologies, Box 1146, SE 164 22, Kista, Sweden

    2Microsystems Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, Box

    534, The Angstrom Laboratory, SE 751 21, Uppsala, Sweden

    To whom correspondence should be addressed ([email protected] and [email protected])

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    3/11

    Submitted to

    2 2

    1. Principles and Implementation1.1. RF Transmitter and Receiver Sub-Modules

    RF

    GND GND

    EN

    VCC

    VOUT

    DCpowersupply

    PRL1

    C1

    C2

    C1

    Power

    de

    tector

    (L55

    34)

    DCpowersupply

    C =1nF,1 C =100pF,C =0.1 F,C =1.5pF,L =19nH2 3 4 1

    NC

    VCC

    GO1555

    GND

    GND GND

    O/PGND

    VCTR

    Tomicrovoltdigitalmultimeter(DMM)

    C3

    PR

    Controlvoltage

    C =1nF,1 NC=Noconnection

    C4

    b)

    a)PT

    Figure S1. Circuit schematics of a) the RF transmitter sub-module in the integrated strain

    sensor (coupling capacitor: C1), and b) the RF power detection unit in the PC-assisted receiver

    (decoupling capacitors: C2 and C3, coupling capacitor: C1, matching capacitor: C4, matching

    inductor: L1).

    The simplified RF transmitter in the integrated wireless sensor device is composed of a

    voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) (Gennum, GO1555), and a coupling capacitor (C1), on a

    flexible laminate of 13 mm 10 mm in size, cf. Figure S1(a). The choice of the VCO is based

    on its proper oscillation frequency range, miniaturized package size, relatively low power

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    4/11

    Submitted to

    3 3

    consumption, as well as sufficient RF output power. The chosen VCO generates stable

    continuous wave (CW) RF signals around 1.5 GHz when a supply voltage in the range of

    2.25-2.75V and a control voltage ranging from 1.0V to 1.5V are applied. Moreover, it only

    draws a maximum supply current of 8 mA. This factor implies that this RF transmitter

    circuitry can be effectively powered by two serially connected commercially available AA or

    other types of standard portable batteries.

    Figure S1(b) shows the circuit schematic of the RF power detection sub-module in the PC-

    assisted receiver. In addition to an RF power detector (Linear Technology, LT 5534), this unit

    also contains two decoupling capacitors (C2 and C3), one coupling capacitor (C1), one

    matching capacitor (C4), and one matching inductor (L1), all soldered on a small piece of

    FPCB with a size of 10 mm 20 mm. The integrated RF power detection circuitry is capable

    of precisely converting the injected RF signals, in a decibel scale ranging from -60 dBm to 0

    dBm, into DC voltage in a linear scale around 1.5 GHz.

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    5/11

    Submitted to

    4 4

    1.2. Strain Sensor Contained Liquid Metal Antenna

    c)

    d)

    e)

    f)

    g)

    Blanksheet

    Sealinlet3withadhesivetape

    Injectupperfluidmetallayer,encapsureoutletsintopreplicawithuncuredPDMSdroplets&sealinlets1&3

    Flipsample&injectlowerfluidmetallayer,encapsulateinlet2andoutletsinbottomreplicawithuncuredPDMSdroplets

    Removeadhesivetapeoninlets1&3

    PDMS Upperfluidmetallayer Adhesivetapefortemporarilysealinginlets

    Bottomfluidmetallayer

    Topreplica&blanksheetPunchoutaholeforinlet3&sealtobottomreplica

    Bottomreplica

    Topreplica&blanksheet&bottomreplica

    Topreplica&blanksheet&bottomreplica

    Bottomreplica&blanksheet&topreplica

    Topreplica&blanksheet&bottomreplica

    Inlet3

    b)

    a)

    TopreplicabondedtoablankPDMSsheet

    Topreplica

    To p a nd b ot t om P DM S e la st o me r patterned by replica molding, withpunchedholesforinlets1&2,andoutletsBottomreplica Outlets

    Inlet1

    Inlet2

    Topreplica

    Figure S2. Fabrication process steps of the multi-layer microfluidic stretchable patch antenna

    integrated in the presented wireless strain sensor.

    Minor modifications have been made to adapt the previously reported fabrication processes to

    the multi-layer FSRFEs based wireless strain sensor presented in this paper.[1-2]

    The

    implementation of the integrated sensor device can be briefly summarized as the following

    steps: fluidic patch antenna fabrication, active circuit assembly, and hybrid device integration.

    The latter two resemble the manufacturing and integration processes presented in the previous

    work. Concerning the antenna fabrication, one more PDMS as well as liquid metal alloy

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    6/11

    Submitted to

    5 5

    layers have been added to implement multi-layer FSRFEs. More detailed process steps are

    illustrated in Figure S2 and described as below:

    First of all, the upper (antenna patch) and lower (ground plane) microfluidic channels were

    respectively constructed in the top and the bottom PDMS slabs, with a standard soft

    lithography. And then a few inlets and outlets were punched as depicted in Figure S2. In

    addition, the blank middle PDMS sheet with a thickness of 1.5 mm was also fabricated. Later,

    the micro-structured top PDMS layer was bonded to the blank PDMS slab using corona

    discharging activation, and the inlet 3, cf. Figure S2, was punched on the bonded PDMS sheet.

    Subsequently, the bottom PDMS slab was bonded to the upper PDMS layers with plasma

    bonding. After sealing the inlet 3 with a small piece of Scotch

    tape, the upper microfluidic

    channels were filled with galinstan fluid, and the ventilation outlets in the top PDMS slab

    were encapsulated using PDMS prepolymer afterwards. Whereafter, both the inlets 1 and 3

    were sealed with Scotch

    tape, and galinstan alloy was injected into the lower microfluidic

    channels from the bottom side. All remaining ventilation outlets together with the inlet 2 were

    encapsulated, and the inlets 1 and 3 were reserved for connecting the RF transmitter circuitry

    in the hybrid sensor device.

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    7/11

    Submitted to

    6 6

    PDMSUpperfluidmetallayer

    CrossView hupper

    d

    h

    f

    z

    y

    x

    xy

    z

    q

    TopView

    -+

    Lowerfluidmetallayer

    -+

    h lowerhmiddle

    Wms

    L inset

    Wpatch

    Lpatch

    Lground

    Wground

    Two openings for connecting RFfeedcableinthestandaloneantennacharacterizations or RF transmittersub-moduleintheintegrateddevice

    Figure S3. Geometric configuration of the elastic fluid metal patch antenna. Dimensions are:

    Lpatch = 56.0 mm, Wpatch = 50.0 mm,Lground = 110.0 mm, Wground= 80.0 mm,Linset= 16.0 mm,

    Wms = 3.7 mm, h = 2.5 mm, hupper= 75.0 m, hmiddle = 1.5 mm, and hlower= 75.0 m.

    Assuming that the PDMS elastomer had the relative permittivity of 3.0 and the dissipation

    factor of 0.01 around 1.5 GHz, the conductivity of the liquid alloy, galinstan, was about 3.46

    106

    S/m, and the spacing (hmiddle) and the width (Wpatch) of the patch antenna were 1.5 mm

    and 50.0 mm, an initial value of 57.3 mm for Lpatch was found, according to the transmission

    line model of the rectangular microstrip patch antennas.[3]

    Of course, electrical performance

    of the patch antenna based on the proposed geometrical configuration must be verified in

    more accurate numerical simulations, and some minor adjustments are probably needed for

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    8/11

    Submitted to

    7 7

    tuning its resonant frequency. Since the thickness of the PDMS membrane on top of the

    antenna patch is only approximately 425 m, 1/500 of the operational wavelengths at 1.5 GHz,

    its influence on the antenna electrical performance are negligible.

    1.3. Integrated Wireless Strain Sensor

    C

    GO1555

    b)

    a)

    c)

    d)

    e)

    f)

    C

    GO1555GO1555

    C

    GO1555

    PDMSUpperfluidmetallayer

    Lowerfluidmetallayer

    Kaptonfoil VCOchip

    MetallicpinCopper Capacitor Anode Cathode

    C

    Solder

    Figure S4. Schematic drawings of the integration procedure for the demonstrated

    microfluidic stretchable wireless strain sensor.

    In brief, two tin-plated contact pins resembling cantilevers were first soldered to the RF

    output and the ground pads on the FPCB of the RF transmitter, respectively. And then a semi-

    spherical solder ball was mounted to the bottom surface of each pin at the other end.

    Whereafter, three thin wires were respectively soldered to the supply voltage, the control

    voltage, and the ground pads of the RF transmitter circuitry for external power supply

    connection, as observed in Figure 1. Subsequently, this RF transmitter sub-module was

    attached to the top surface of the previously fabricated liquid metal patch antenna, and each

    solder ball at the end of the contact pin was directly immersed in the fluid metal enclosed in

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    9/11

    Submitted to

    8 8

    the micro-structured elastomeric channels, via the two opening in the upper PDMS membrane,

    cf. Figures 1, S3 and S4. In the end, the complete RF transmitter including the two contact

    pins were locally encapsulated in a PDMS LSC for protecting from stretching.

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    10/11

    Submitted to

    9 9

    1.4. System Demonstration

    RemoteMonitor

    PR

    IntegratedWirelessStrainSensor

    Hornantenna

    Voltage-controlledosillator(VCO)

    DCpowersupply

    Microfluidicelasticantenna

    Flexiblecircuitry

    PT

    5m

    RFpowerdetector

    MicrovoltDMM

    DCpowersupply

    PC

    Tunableattenuator

    DCpowersupply

    RFamplifier

    Figure S5. Schematic illustration of the system demonstration setup for remotely sensing

    mechanical strains in real-time, using the integrated sensor device.

    Besides the self-contained sensor device, a custom-designed PC-assisted RF receiver has also

    been implemented for remote monitoring in the system demonstration, as illustrated in Figure

    S5. Of course, similar receiving function can also be realized using commercially available

    RF measurement instruments, for instance, spectrum analyzers or RF power meters, but the

    intention here was to remove all costly and bulky RF test equipment, and replace them with

    cost-effective modules. Figure S5 displays the schematic illustration of the system

    demonstration setup for remotely sensing high tensile mechanical strains in real-time, of

    which the receiver part consists of a standard gain horn (Flann Microwave, 08240-10), a

    coaxial amplifier (Mini-circuits, ZKL-2R5), a tunable HP attenuator (HP, 8495A), a Keithley

    197A autoranging microvolt digital multimeter, a laptop, a DC power supply, and an RF

    power detection unit powered by four serially connected AA rechargeable batteries with a DC

    supply voltage of 5.23V.

  • 8/3/2019 adfm_201002508_sm_suppl

    11/11

    Submitted to

    10 10

    2. Results and Discussion2.1. RF Power Detection Unit

    -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 00

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    InputRFPower(dBm)

    OutputDC

    Voltag

    e(V)

    Figure S6. Measured output DC voltages of the RF power detection sub-module in the

    custom-designed RF receiver versus varying input RF power around 1.5 GHz.

    [1]

    S. Cheng, Z.G. Wu,Lab Chip.

    2010

    ,10

    , 3227.

    [2] S. Cheng, Z.G. Wu, P. Hallbjorner, K. Hjort, A. Rydberg,IEEE T. Antenn. Propag.2009,57, 3756.

    [3] C. A. Balanis,Antenna Theory, 2nd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997.