Post on 10-Dec-2014
description
PROJECT MANAGERSINI KOTILAINEN
sini.kotilainen(at)tut.fi
MODUL ARBUILDING
A RESIDENT-CENTRIC AND MULTIFORM HOUSING CONSTRUCTION MODEL?
C O N C E L L SNEAPO OY ARCHITECTS HEDMAN & MATOMÄKI OY
RAMBOLL FINLAND OYSUUNNITTELULINJA FINLAND OY
RESPONSABLE LEADER: PROFESSOR MARKKU HEDMAN
RESEARCHER, PROJECT MANAGER: SINI KOTILAINEN
TUT/ DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
MODULAR BUILDINGSTEEL CORE PANEL STRUCTURE:
THE STEEL CONSTRUCTION INSTITUTE, UKTECNALIA, SPAIN
HTA ARCHITECTS, UK NEAPO OY
AST, SPAIN
C O N C E L L SMOD CONSTUT/ DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
MODULAR BUILDINGSTEEL CORE PANEL STRUCTURE:
RESPONSABLE LEADER: PROFESSOR MARKKU HEDMAN
RESEARCHER, PROJECT MANAGER: SINI KOTILAINEN
MOD CONSMODULAKEALAKEA OY
MODULAR BUILDING
C O N C E L L SCLT WOOD STRUCTURE:
RESPONSABLE LEADER: PROFESSOR MARKKU HEDMAN
RESEARCHER, PROJECT MANAGER: SINI KOTILAINEN
MODUL ARBUILDING
A RESIDENT-CENTRIC AND MULTIFORM HOUSING CONSTRUCTION MODEL?
IN COUNTRIES WHERE ON-SITE BUILDING IS MORE COMMON, EVEN ELEMENT-BASED BUILDING IS SOMETIMES CALLED
”MODULAR CONSTRUCTION”
NAMING IS INTERNATIONALLY VARIANT
VOLUMETRICMODULES
MODULAR BUILDING
PICTURE: NEAPO Oy
NOWADAYS, CONSTRUCTION WORK IS USUALLY BASED ON JOINING TOGETHER PRE-MANUFACTURED COMPONENTS
PICTURE: NEAPO Oy
MODULAR BUILDING TAKES THE PRE-PREPARATION LEVEL FURTHER
PICTURE: NEAPO Oy
AND MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO JOIN TOGETHER ENTIRE READY-MADE APARTMENTS OR PARTS OF APARTMENTS ON THE BUILDIG SITE
THE REVIEWS SHOW EVIDENCE OF DRIVERS TOWARDS AND AGAINST MODULAR BUILDING
SUSTAINABILITY?
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE RESIDENTS?
RANNISTO (2013) TUT/ DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGINTERVIEW RESEARCH
THE LIMITED POSSIBILITIES AND THE MONOTONY OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN IS SEEN AS THE ONE WEAKNESS OF MODULAR CONSTRUCTION
WE SHOULD ALREADY DURING THE EARLY PHASE OF MODULAR BUILDING CONSIDER HOW THE POSSIBILITIES OF MODULAR BUILDING CAN BE USED TO
MEET THE NEEDS OF RESIDENTS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF HOUSING
8.0 m
Room
13.0 m
Room
THE HYPOTHESIS IS MODULAR CONSTRUCTION THAT ENABLES THE CONSTRUCTION OF
RESIDENT-CENTRIC AND MULTIFORM MULTI-STOREY BUILDING
PHASE 1METHOD: LITERATURE REVIEW A
THE ADVANTAGES, CHALLENGES AND POSSIBILITIES OF MODULAR CONSTRUCTION
THE CONCEPTS OF MODULARITY AND MODULE FROM A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
CONNECTING MODULARITY TO THE CONTEXT OF INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION
PHASE 1METHOD: LITERATURE REVIEW
AN ANALYSIS FOCUSING ON THE LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF DWELLING
EXPLORING THE MEGA-TRENDS THAT WILL CHANGE THE FINNISH HOUSING
REVIEW OF CHANGES IN, AND THE FUTURE OF, HOUSING
B
PHASE 2
INVESTIGATIONS USING ONE EXAMPLE MODULAR SYSTEM
METHOD:”RESEARCH BY DESIGN”
HOW MODULAR BUILDING CAN MEET THE FUTURE NEEDS OF HOUSING?
( (
KPH
A PUM
ODUU
L I
MH
WC
S
VH
K K
TPK
ALK
K PH
KPH
TPK
E
ALK
E
S IVUASUNTO/
E
WC
K HH
S
E
APUM
ODUU
L I
2 x APUMODUUL I
LARGE PRODUCTION OF SIMILAR SIZED MODULES CAN POSSIBLY CREATE COST SAVINGS FOR EXAMPLE IN DIVERSE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
EXAMPLE MODULAR SYSTEM
OPENINGS
ENTRANCE
54,3 m 2
SERVICED PART AREA
BUILDING SERVICESIN STAIRWELL
SERIAL PRODUCTION - SERIAL CUSTOMIZATION
SERIAL PRODUCTION CAN ALSO BE IMPLEMENTED AS SERIAL CUSTOMIZATION: SOME PROPERTIES STAY THE SAME . . .
OH
K
MH
KPH
E
OH
K .SAAREKE
K
MH
S
KPH
S
TPKMH
E KPHVH/VAR.
MH
KPH
OH
K
MH
KPH
E
EK
ES VH/VAR.K PH E
MHOH
OHALK.
K PH
E
K
AUKOTUS MÄÄRITELTY
SISÄÄNTULOALUE
54,3 m 2
. . . BUT SOME OF THE PROPERTIES DIFFER FROM ONE MODULE TO THE NEXT
STEEL CORE PANELS STEEL CORE PANEL MODULES
MODULARBUILDING
MODULAR SYSTEM WAS GENERATED IN CONCELLS -PROJECT FOR STEEL CORE PANEL MODULES AND FOR FINNISH RESIDENTIAL MARKET
MODULAR SYSTEM4,5 m x 6 ,5 m26 ,3 m 2
4 ,5 m x 8 ,275 m36 ,9 m 2
MODULAR SYSTEM
6 ,5 m x 6 ,5 m38 ,8 m 2
MODULAR SYSTEM
6 ,5 m x 9 m54 ,3 m 2 MODULAR SYSTEM
APUMODUULI AM
AM
i nne r w id th 1500 mm MODULAR SYSTEM
CHALLENGE OF CHANGING LIFESTYLES, DAILY MOBILITY, THE SIZE OF HOUSEHOLDS, FAMILYS, POPULATION STRUCTURE,
TIME MANAGEMENT, TYPES OF LIVING...
MANY CHANGES IN OUR SOCIETY HIGHLIGHTS THE IMPORTANCE OF FLEXIBLE APARTMENTS AND THE ADAPTABILITY OF SPACES
FLEXIBILITY AND INDIVIDUALIZATION OF THE APARTMENTS
TECHNICAL CONVERTIBILITY
MODIFIABILITY
MULTIPURPOSE SPACES
“NEUTRAL ROOMS”
LOFT SOLUTIONS: LARGER HEIGHT OF A MODULE
WHAT WAS INVESTIGATED?
INFILLSUPPORT(BASE BUILDING)
URBAN TISSUE
CITY STRUCTURE
OPEN BUILDING AIMS THAT RESIDENTS CAN DETERMINE AND MODIFY THEIR OWN APARTMENT WITHOUT AFFECTING THE BIGGER SCALE, THE FRAME OF THE BUILDING
S
VH/VAR.
K PH
E
YHDENAVOIMENT ILAN
RATKA ISU
S
VH/VAR.
K PH
E
ETÄTYÖTSTO.
SPATIAL ARCHETYPE: DIVISIBLE SPACE AS THE MODULES ARE SELF-SUPPORTING, NO NEED FOR LOAD-BEARING PARTITION WALLS INSIDE MODULES - RESIDENT CAN BE LEFT IN CHARGE
INSPIRATION
Töölöläisasunnon konsepti
Arkkitehtuuri- ja muotoilutoimisto Talli
SPATIAL ARCHETYPE: THE SPACE STRUCTURE BASED ON ROOM CELLSFAMILY APARTMENTS USUALLY HAVE STIFF MODULE FRAMES AS PARTITION WALLS WITHIN THEM - RESIDENTS CAN NOT CHANGE THE MODULE FRAMES
5 m
T P K
EK P H
PA RV IMA HDOL L ISUUS
A LK ./VAR sä
ilyty
s-k
alu
ste
et
INCREASING THE HEIGHT OF A ROOM WOULD ALLOW MANY FLEXIBLE AND MULTI USABLE SPACE SOLUTIONS IN APARTMENTS
PA RV IMA HDOL L ISUUS
O H
K P H
E
K
2 M H /M H
PA RV IMA HDOL L ISUUS
5 m
KEINOJA MONIKÄYTTÖISIIN, JOUSTAVIIN ASUNTOIHIN
INCREASING THE HEIGHT OF A ROOM WOULD ALLOW MANY FLEXIBLE AND MULTI USABLE SPACE SOLUTIONS IN APARTMENTS
Vainio ym. 2012, 22.
1960
0
500 000
1 000 000
1 500 000
2 000 000
2 500 000
3 000 000
1980 20001970 1990 2010 20251965 1985 2005 20201975 1995 2015 2030
THE SIZE OF HOUSEHOLDS DECREASES – THE NUMBER INCREASES
LIVING ALONE
2 ADULT FAMILIES
FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN
IN FUTURE, HOUSING STOCK WILL CONTINUE TO CHANGE LARGELY VIA THE DIFFERENTIATING HOUSEHOLD-DWELLING UNITS
WHAT WAS INVESTIGATED?
EK PH
S
KPH
MHOH
SIVUAS/MH
K E
VH
VH
S
KPH
MHOH
W CK E
VH
VH/VAR.
MH MH
E
TPK
K PHKPH
MH
OH
K
VH/VAR
E
+
HM
AM
AM
Commuters share (%) of employed by municipality 8,4-21,5 21,6-30,2 30,3-40,6 40,7-57,2 57,23-90,0Employment Statistics 2009
THE REALIZATION OF CONTRADICTING HOUSING WISHES:COMMUTING HAS ITS PROBLEMS IN TERMS OF FINANCIAL AND ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY
Placement for housing production 2012-2030 < 1 1,0-2,5 2,5-4,5 > 4,5
VTT 2012
FUNCTIONAL POSSIBILITIES?
A SENSE OF BELONGING BETWEEN THE PLACE AND THE RESIDENT?
THE POSSIBILITY TO PERSONALIZE SPACE? RESTORATIVE
ENVIRONMENTS?
HOW HOUSING EXTERIORS INFLUENCE THE QUALITY OF HOME?
USABILITY?TERRITORIES?
THE APPEAL OF URBAN LIVING PLAYS A MAJOR PART IN COMPACTNESS OF THE URBAN STRUCTURE AND REDUCING THE EMISSIONS OF TRAFFIC
MODUULI
MODUULI
THE APARTMENT-SPECIFIC OUTDOOR AREA AS AN ADDED PART OR ZONE
DEEP RELIEF-LIKE STRUCTURE: HORIZONTAL AND/OR VERTICAL POCKES OF MODULES
TERRACING THE BUILDING MASS
COMBINATIONS OF A POCKET BETWEEN MODULES AND YARD STAIRS
SHARED TERRACES
WHAT WAS INVESTIGATED?
KPH
S
KPH
MH OH
MH
W CKE
VH
VH
S
KPH
MH
OH
MH
W C
K
E
VH
VH
MH
MH
OH
K
E
KPH
KPH
TPK
E
VH
K
OH
MH
PARILLINEN KRS
?+
TE
M H
K
O H
K P H
E
L IITERI
T P K
EK P HL IITERI
O H
E
A UL A
K
M H
HMAM
AM
HMAM
AM
M H
K
O H
K P H
E
L IITERI
S IV UA S./M H
EK P HL IITERI
O H
E
A UL A
K
M H
AN APARTMENT-SPECIFIC OUTDOOR AREA CONNECTING THE DIFFERENT WINGS/SIDES
OF THE APARTMENT
HMAM
AM
O H
E
A UL A
K
M H
M H
K P H EL IITERI
S IV UA S./M H
M H
K
O H
K P H
E
L IITERI
AN APARTMENT-SPECIFIC OUTDOOR AREA CONNECTING THE DIFFERENT WINGS/SIDES
OF THE APARTMENT
K P H
E
T P K
T P K
E
K P H
T P K
E
K P H
T P K
E
K P H
T P K
E
K P H
T P K
E
K P H T P KE
K P H
AUK I Y LÖS JA ALAS
TE
TE
TE
WHAT WAS INVESTIGATED?
INTERESTING OPPORTUNITIES IN URBAN CITY-SCALE
MASS SOLUTIONS FOR MODULAR BUILDING MASS IN A VERTICAL AND HORISONTAL SECTION
LARGE OPENINGS UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING MASS
VARYING ROOFTOP LEVELS
LARGE OPENINGS IN THE BUILDING MASS
ATRIUM BUILDINGS, LIGHT SHAFTS
COURTYARDS
YARDS PARTIALLY SURROUNDED BY THE BUILDING
WEAVE -LIKE BLOCKS
WHAT WAS INVESTIGATED?
OH
KPHKE
MH
E
MH
MH
K
OH
E
OH
KHH/VAR
K PH
E
K
VH
MH
W CS
L IITERI
L IITERI
L IITERI
L IITERI
O H
KPH KE
MH
MHMH
KHH/VAR
K
OH
OH
KPH
K
E
MH
L IITERI
L IITERI
L IITERI
L IITERI
KPH
K
K
OH
S
K
E
K PH
OH
S
MH
KHH/VAR/VH
K
E
OH
MH
KHH/VAR/VH
OH OH
KPHKPH
MHMH
KPHKPH
MHMH
saareke
K
saareke
saareke
K
saareke
OH
EE
E E
TE
OH
KPH
K
E
MH
VH/VAR/ALK ./T YÖ
E K PH
TPK
SKPH MH
OH
MH
W C
K
E
K HH/VH
VH
S KPHMH
OH
MH
W C
K
E
K HH/VH
VH
OH
KPH
K
E
MH
VH/VAR/ALK ./T YÖ
EK PH
TPK
TE
H
E KPH K K
KPH
OH
MH
K E
KPHE
TPK
K KTPK
EK PH
TPK
EK PH
KPH
VH/VAR
MH
TPK
E
VH/VAR/ALK ./T YÖ
E
K PH
VH/VAR/ALK ./T YÖ
E
K PH
VH/VAR/ALK ./T YÖ
E
K PH
VH/VAR/ALK ./T YÖ
E
K PH
VH/VAR/ALK ./T YÖ
E
K PH
VH/VAR/ALK ./T YÖ
E
K PH
OH
E
AULA
K
W C
KPH
AULA
E
MH
MH
MH
OH
K
KPH
MH
S
VAR/VH
W C
KPH
AULA
E
MHMH MH OH
KKPH
MHS
VAR/VH
1- 2MH
S
K PH
E K
OH
1- 2MH
S
KPH
E
K
OH
1- 2MH
SKPH
EK
OH
1- 2MH
KPH
E
K
OH
1- 2MH
SK
OH
KPHK
OH
KAHDEN ASUNNON
JAKAMA AULA
KAHDEN ASUNNON
JAKAMA AULA
TPK
E K PH
KPHE
TPK
OH
K
MH
KPH
OH
K
KPH
K
K
MH
OH
MH
OH
E
E
E
E
K PH
KPH
ALK
MH
TE
K P H
E
T P K
T P K
E
K P H
T P K
E
K P H
T P K
E
K P H
T P K
E
K P H
T P K
E
K P H T P KE
K P H
AUK I Y LÖS JA ALAS
E
T P K
K P H
K P H
E
K
V H/K HH
SOPP I
SOPP I
K P HEK P H E
K P H EK P HE
T ST OT ST O T ST O T ST O
K P H
K saareke
K P H
M H
M H
V H/VAR
V H/VAR
M H
M H
E
E
E
E
K HH
K HH
K
saareke
K P H
M H
V H/VAR
M H
EE
K HH
E
T P KK P H
E
T P KK P H
KPH
S
KPH
MH OH
MH
W CKE
VH
VH
S
KPH
MH
OH
MH
W C
K
E
VH
VH
MH
MH
OH
K
E
KPH
KPH
TPK
E
VH
K
OH
MH
TRANSDISCIPLINARY
DISCIPLINARY
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
CREATIVE PRACTICE
Adapted from Dunin-Woyseth and Nilsson 2008.
STUDIES MOVES IN THE AREA WHERE CREATIVE PRACTICE AND TRANSDISCIPLINARITY OVERLAP: METHOD CREATES OPPORTUNITIES AND IS A BIG CHALLENGE
THE RESEARCH RESULTS?
“INFORMATION” TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING STUDIES
AWARENESS OF THE IMPORTANCE OF ARCHITECTURAL POINT OF VIEW IN MODULAR CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT MANAGERSINI KOTILAINEN
sini.kotilainen(at)tut.fi040 849 0427
MODUL ARBUILDING
A RESIDENT-CENTRIC AND MULTIFORM HOUSING CONSTRUCTION MODEL?