Worldcon09

29
Talking to My Dog About Science I like chees e Chad Orzel w to Talk Science to Non-Scientists and Why It Matt http://scienceblogs.com/principles/ 2 xp

description

Slides for my talk on how to talk about science to a general audience, given at Anticipation, the 2009 World Science Fiction Convention in Montreal.

Transcript of Worldcon09

Page 1: Worldcon09

Talking to My Dog About Science

I like chees

e

Chad Orzel

How to Talk Science to Non-Scientists and Why It Matters

http://scienceblogs.com/principles/

2x p

Page 2: Worldcon09

Public KnowledgeWhat’s the problem?

Science literacy among public is depressingly bad

(Note: Not just a US problem)

NSF Science and Engineering Indicators, 2008

Page 3: Worldcon09

Public AttitudesThe general public likes science…

87% support Federal funding

41% favor spending more

(ahead of defense, space, foreign aid)

… when they notice it.

87% interested in new discoveries

47% “a lot” of interest

only 15% follow science news “very closely”

10th place– sports gets 23%, religion 16%

(NSF Science & Engineering indicators 2008)

Page 4: Worldcon09

Funding ConsequencesPublic favors funding,but not a priority

Lots of money for“crises,” then loseinterest

Science funding iseasily cut

easy to ridicule

no strong constituency

No electoral consequences for cutting science funding

Page 5: Worldcon09

Who Should We Blame?Who caused the disconnect between science and general public?

Politicians?

Tempting, but no…

Religion?

Lots of religious scientists

Teachers?

Doing the best they can…

My claim: WE HAVE FAILED AT OUR JOBS AS SCIENTISTS

Page 6: Worldcon09

What Is Science?Science is a process for learning about the world:

1) Look at the world

2) Make up a theory

3) Test your theory

4) Tell everyone about it

Find some interesting phenomenon to explain

Develop a model to explain the phenomenon

Design experiments, make observations to test model

Publication, dissemination, replication

Page 7: Worldcon09

History1) Look at the world

2) Make up a theory

3) Test your theory

4) Tell everyone about it

First two steps go back to antiquity

Aristotle, Pythagoreans, etc.

Lots of nifty ideas, many totally wrong

No systematic culture of experiment

Page 8: Worldcon09

History1) Look at the world

2) Make up a theory

3) Test your theory

4) Tell everyone about it

Step 3 becomes established in 1600’s

Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

Experiments allow you to distinguish between theories

(roughly contemporary developments in medicine, etc.)

Systematic study of mechanics, astronomy

Page 9: Worldcon09

History1) Look at the world

2) Make up a theory

3) Test your theory

4) Tell everyone about it

Step 4: Surprisingly late catching on

Robert Hooke, 1676: “ceiiinossssttuv”

“ut tensio, sic vis” F=-kx

R. Hooke

Step 4 separates science from alchemy

Stand on “shoulders of giants”

Page 10: Worldcon09

Models of Publication

Two models of approaching scientific communication:

Sir Isaac Newton(1642-1727)

Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

(hat-tip: Robert Krulwich, WNYC Radiolab)

Page 11: Worldcon09

Newtonian PublicationMost famous work:

Philosophiae NaturalisPrincipia Mathematica

(published 1687)

Written in Latin, highly technical, highly mathematical

Deliberately difficult, “to avoid being baited by little smatterersin mathematicks”

Page 12: Worldcon09

Galileian PublicationMost famous work:

Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems

(published 1632)

Written in vernacular, dialogue between three characters

Witty, accessible, highly readable, and persuasive

Banned, but widely read and influential

Page 13: Worldcon09

Results

Outcomes of different publication models:

Lesson of History:

Newtonian Publication Is Better For Your Career

Newton

Galileo:

Master of the Mint

The Inquisition

Page 14: Worldcon09

Newton LivesSame pattern still holds today

Newtonian publication preferred

Hiring, promotion, prestige depend on technical publications aimed at a narrow audience of other scientists

Science, not Scientific American

Galileian publication discounted or ignored

Even pedagogical research doesn’t fully “count”

Page 15: Worldcon09

What to Do?Public knowledge and appreciation of science are not very good

As scientists, we need to do a better job

Engage public interest

Create a constituency for science

More Galileian approach to science

The opportunity (and audience) exists

Page 16: Worldcon09

What to Do?Support the people who bring science to the general public:

Buy and promote science books

Support science education across the boardNot just hot-button issues

Demand science from the media

Encourage good communicatorsMove beyond “Get back in the lab!”

Reward outreach at tenure and promotion reviewsMake talking to the public a positive

Encourage Galileos, don’t force them to be Newtons

Train and support science teachers

Encourage science students in other careers

Page 17: Worldcon09

So You Want to Be Galileo…How do you go about communicating science to the general public?

No single, foolproof method

Have to find what works for you

Similar to asking “How do you write a bestselling SF novel?”

As many strategies as there are popularizers

Can suggest some general approaches

NOTE: Not about “dumbing down” or condescending to audience

Ways to make real science appealing to non-scientists

Page 18: Worldcon09

Make It About PeopleScience is done by humans tell the human story behind the science

Page 19: Worldcon09

Make It RelevantTie science to previously existing interests

Page 20: Worldcon09

Make It Look PrettyCompelling images worth many kwords

Page 21: Worldcon09

Make It Entertaining

National Academy of Sciences initiative

Put writers and producers in touch with scientists

http://www.scienceandentertainmentexchange.org/

Page 22: Worldcon09

Make It ParticipatoryLearn science by doing science: Hands-on experiences

Page 23: Worldcon09

Make It Explode

Fire is cool

Page 24: Worldcon09

Make it WhimsicalWit and humor go a long way toward making technical subjects palatable

Page 25: Worldcon09

What About the Dog?

Emmy, Queen of Niskayuna

January, 2007:

“Bunnies Made of Cheese”

Imaginary conversation about QED

Dramatic Reading:(CNET Buzz Podcast, ~2min)

The dog is standing at the window, wagging her tail excitedly. I look outside, and the back yard is empty.

"What are you looking at?" I ask.

"Bunnies made of cheese!," she says. I look again, and the yard is still empty.

Page 26: Worldcon09

Many Worlds, Many Treats

I'm sitting at the computer typing, when the dog bumps up against my legs. I look down, and she's sniffing the floor around my feet intently.

"What are you doing down there?“

"I'm looking for steak!" she says, wagging her tail hopefully.

"I'm pretty certain that there's no steak down there," I say. "I've never eaten steak at the computer, and I've certainly never dropped any on the floor.“

"You did in some universe," she says, still sniffing.

May 2007:

Page 27: Worldcon09

Bunnies Made of Cheese: The Book“Many Worlds, Many Treats” linked by Boing Boing, Digg

more than 50,000 readers

How to Teach Physics to Your Dog

Scribner, December 22, 2009

Mixes dog conversations with physics explanations

Explain quantum mechanics to general audience

Page 28: Worldcon09

Other Suggestions1) Be Patient It’s always 101 for somebody

Same questions all the time, but from different people

2) Start a Weblog

Cheap and easy way to reach large audience

Get practice writing for an audience

3) Volunteer for outreach efforts

Schools often happy to have outside speakers

4) Learn to talk to the media

Sound bites, talking on camera, etc.

Page 29: Worldcon09

Conclusions

Public understanding, support for science shaky

Feast-or-famine funding instability

Academic culture does not reward public outreach

Technical, “Newtonian” publication preferred

Claim: Need more outreach to build constituency for science

“Galileian” publication

Lots of strategies for talking to the general public

Find what works for you