vinay proj wip
-
Upload
nanda-kudukuli -
Category
Documents
-
view
232 -
download
0
Transcript of vinay proj wip
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
1/14
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
The world of banking has assumed a new dimension at dawn of the 21st
century with
the advent of tech banking, thereby lending the industry a stamp of universality. In
general, banking may be classified as retail and corporate banking. Retail banking,
which is designed to meet the requirement of individual customers and encourage
their savings, includes payment of utility bills, consumer loans, credit cards, checking
account and the like. Corporate banking, on the other hand, caters to the need ofcorporate customers like bills discounting, opening letters of credit, managing cash,
etc.
Metamorphic changes took place in the Indian financial system during the eighties
and nineties consequent upon deregulation and liberalization of economic policies of
the government. India began shaping up its economy and earmarked ambitious plan
for economic growth. Consequently, a sea change in money and capital markets took
place. Application of marketing concept in the banking sector was introduced to
enhance the customer satisfaction the policy of privatization of banking services aims
at encouraging the competition in banking sector and introduction of financial
services. Consequently, services such as Demat, Internet banking, Portfolio
Management, Venture capital, etc, came into existence to cater to the needs of public.
An important agenda for every banker today is greater operational efficiency and
customer satisfaction. The mew watchword for the bank is pretty ambitious: customer
delight.
The introduction to the marketing concept to banking sectors can be traced back to
American Banking Association Conference of 1958. Banks marketing can be defined
as the part of management activity, which seems to direct the flow of banking services
profitability to the customers. The marketing concept basically requires that there
should be thorough understanding of customer need and to learn about market it
operates in. Further the market is segmented so as to understand the requirement of
the customer at a profit to the banks.
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
2/14
2
Definition of Bank:
The Oxford dictionary defines the Bank as,
An establishment for the custody of money, which it pays out, on a
customers order.
According to Whitehead,
A Bank is defined as an institution which collects surplus funds from the
public, safeguards them, and makes them available to the true owner when required
and also lends sums be their true owners to those who are in need of funds and canprovide security.
Banking Company in India has been defined in the Banking Companies act 1949,
One which transacts the business of banking which means the accepting, for
the purpose of lending or investment of the deposits of money from the public,
repayable on demand, or otherwise and withdraw able be cheque, draft, order or
otherwise.
The banking system is an integral subsystem of the financial system. It represents an
important channel of collecting small savings form the households and lending it to
the corporate sector.
The Indian banking system has Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as the apex body for all
matters relating to the banking system. It is the central Bank of India. It is also knownas the Banker to All Other Banks.
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
3/14
3
Evolution of Indian Banking:
Ancient banking system of India constituted of indigenous bankers. They have been
carrying on their age-old banking operations in different parts of the country under
different names. The modern age of banking constitutes the fundamental basis of
economic growth. The term Bank is being used since long time but there is no clear
conception regarding its beginning. According to the viewpoint, in good old days.
Italian money leaders were known as Banchi because they kept a special type of
table to transact their business.
1.2 Growth of Banking Sector after Liberalization
The Indian financial sector comprises a large network of commercial banks, financial
institutions, stock exchanges and a wide range of financial instruments. It has
undergone a significant structural transformation since the initiation of financial
liberalization in 1990s. Before financial liberalization, since mid 1960s till the early
1990, the Indian financial system was considered as an instrument of public finance
(Agarwal, 2003). The evolution of Indian financial sector in the post independent
period can be divided in to three distinct periods. During the first period (1947-68),
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) consolidated its role as the agency in charge of
supervision and banking control (Sen & Vaidya, 1997). Till 1960s the neo-Keynesian
perspective dominated, argued interest rates should be kept low in order to promote
capital accumulation (Sen & Vaidya, 1997). During this period Indian financial sector
was characterized by nationalization of banks, directed credit and administered
interest rates (Lawrence & Longjam, 2003). The second period (1969 - mid 1980s),
known as the period of financial repression. The financial repression started with the
nationalization of 14 commercial banks in 1969. As a result interest rate controls,
directed credit programmes, etc. increased in magnitude during this period (Sen &
Vaidya, 1997 & Nair). The third period, mid 1980s onwards, is characterized by
consolidation, diversification and liberalization. However a more comprehensive
liberalization programme was initiated by the government of India during early
1990s.The impetus to financial sector reforms came with the submission of three
influential reports by the Chakravarty Committee in 1985, the Vaghul in 1987 and theNarasimham Committee in 1991. But the recommendations of the Narasimham
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
4/14
4
Committee provided the blueprint of the reforms, especially with regard to banks and
other financial institutions. In 1991, the government of India initiated a
comprehensive financial sector liberalization programme. The liberalization
programme includes de-controlled interest rates, reduced reserve ratios and slowly
reduced government control of banking operations while establishing a market
regulatory framework (Lawrence & Longjam, 2003).
The major objectives of the financial liberalization were to improve the overall
performance of the Indian financial sector, to make the financial institutions more
competent and more efficient. As mentioned earlier, the financial sector comprises
commercial banks, stock exchanges and other financial institutions. However, Indian
financial system continues to be a bank based financial system and the banking sector
plays an important role as a resource mobiliser. It remains the principal source of
resources for many households, small and medium enterprises and also caters the
large industries. And also provides many other financial services. Underlining the
importance of the banking sector, several banking sector specific reforms as a part of
financial reforms were introduced to improve the performance of the Indian banking
sector and to make the Indian banks more competent and efficient. Against this
backdrop, the present paper intends to study the performance of the Indian bankingsector in the post liberalization period. At the same time, it also aims to determine the
cost efficiency of the Indian banks in context of financial liberalization.
Indian Banking Sector:
The Indian banking sector has been dominated by the public sector banks in terms of
number and asset share. The banking sector comprises of 28 public sector banks with
majority government ownership (Box -1), 23 private banks and 27 foreign banks. It
can be seen (Figure: 1), that the number of public sector commercial banks has almost
remained the same over last three decades. And in terms of asset share, the public
sector banks constitute about 70 percent of the total commercial banking asset. But
the point to be noted, the asset share of the public sector banks has gone down from
about 90 percent in 1980 to about 68 percent in 2007. Even though the number of
domestic private banks has declined since 1980s, the asset share of these banks has
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
5/14
5
gone up to about 20 percent in 2007. On the other hand, even though the number of
foreign banks has gone up significantly, their asset share has not increased in that
way. The total banking sector asset constitutes more than 91.8 percent of the GDP at
the end of March 2008 and the commercial banking asset constitutes more than 95
percent of the total banking asset.
Since 1990s, there has been spectacular growth of the Indian banking sector. Several
variables like total asset, total deposit, total credit and net profit has been analyzed to
study the relative progress of the Indian banking sector. In terms of asset, all bank
groups have recorded higher asset growth after the financial reforms. It can be seen
that, during financial reforms the total asset of the Indian banking sector recorded
higher growth and since 1999 total asset of the banking sector has grown
significantly. During 1999, the total commercial bank asset was Rs. 6531.37 billion,
which increased to Rs. 17854.76 billion in 2012. Total deposits of the commercial
banks have gone up significantly since 1999. All bank groups recorded higher deposit
especially after 1999. Total deposit of all banks increased to Rs. 13907.54 billion in
2012, which was Rs. 5283.27 billion in 1999.
The total advances of all commercial banks have gone up significantly over last five
years. Since 2007, the total advances of all commercial banks have been more than
double. In 2007 total advances were Rs. 4344.56 billion and increased to Rs.
10147.76 billion.
The net profit of the Indian commercial banks has gone up significantly over last 7
years. It has gone up from Rs. 43.64 billion in 2005 to Rs. 158.51 billion in 2012. The
public sector banks and the domestic private banks witnessed manifold rise in net
profit.
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
6/14
6
Performance of the Indian Banking Sector: Impact of Reform
Management Performance
The credit deposit ratio reflects the management performance of the banks. It can be
seen after financial liberalization, most of the banks reported higher C-D ratio. The C-
D ratio is the highest in case of the foreign banks and lowest in case of the public
sector banks. The over commercial banking sector witnessed an increase in the credit-
deposit ratio. In 1980, the C-D ratio for all commercial banks was 63.32 percent, and
increased to 73.46 percent in 2012. The investment deposit ratio has also increased,
but marginally.
Asset Quality
The asset quality reflects the structural soundness of the banking sector. The ratio of
contingent liability shows, the foreign banks are more exposed to default, which
implies the foreign banks provide most sophisticated services. It is because most of
the foreign banks are concentrated in urban areas and mostly carter to large clients.
The contingent liability to asset ratio of the total commercial banks shows, it hasdeclined from 25 percent in 1980 to 16 percent in 2012. The foreign banks and the
private banks are exposed to more losses in case of default and the public sector banks
are less exposed to default.
The ratio of investment in securities to assets indicates that banks invest about 20 to
30 percent in government securities in response to SLR. The public sector banks have
higher percentage of investment in government securities and the foreign banks
investment is the lowest. The public sector banks prefer to invest more in the
government securities because; it is more liquid and the safest investment. Even after
financial reforms the PSBss investment in government securities has gone up.
The ratio of term loans to asset shows, over years it has increased to about 58 percent
in 2012. The private banks have increased the term loans to about 70 percent and the
public sector banks have been almost consistent about 30 percent on average till 2003
and thereafter witnessed a rapid increase in their term loans.
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
7/14
7
Profitability
Profitability can be measured with two indicators; Return on Asset (ROA) and the
Return on Equity (ROE). The return on asset is defined as the ratio of net profit to
average asset. It can be seen that, after financial reforms the banks are more
profitable. The foreign banks are more profitable than the domestic private banks and
the public sector banks. After financial liberalization, the private and the foreign
banks recorded higher rate of return on asset. During the early phase of reforms, the
return on asset was negative. But after that it increased from -0.89 percent in 1994 to
1 percent in 2012.
Return on equity can be taken as proxy to measure profitability. The private banks are
more consistent since 1990s in terms of the return on equity, where as the foreign
banks have been the most inconsistent. During early 1990s the return on equity of the
foreign banks was about 132 percent and in 2012 it is about 16 percent. The public
sector banks are performing better with 16.14 percent return on equity.
Concentration
The Indian banking sector is dominated by the public sector banks. However, with the
initiation of financial liberalization, several private and foreign banks started
functioning, which ushered in competition in the Indian banking sector. Even the
share of public sector banks in total asset, deposit and credit has declined; still they
dominate the Indian banking sector.
The Concept of Efficiency
The efficiency of the banking sector can be decomposed in to scale efficiency, scope
efficiency, pure technical efficiency and allocative efficiency (Chen, 2001). The bank
is said to have scale efficiency, when it operates in the range of constant returns to
scale and have scope efficiency, when it operates in different diversified locations.
Maximizing output from a given level of input is called technical efficiency and when
a bank chooses the revenue maximizing mix of output, the allocative efficiency
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
8/14
8
occurs (Chen, 2001). According to Berger, the most important origin of the cost
problems in banking is the X-efficiency, which is the differences in the managerial
ability to control cost for a given level of production (as discussed in Chen, 2001).
The Xefficiency includes both the technical and allocative efficiency. The X-
efficiency can be estimated in four ways. These are the Data Envelopment Analysis
(DEA), the Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA), the Thick Frontier Approach (TFA)
and the Distribution Free Approach (DFA) (Chen, 2001).
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
9/14
9
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Review of Literature
2.3 Statement of the Problem
After liberalization there was drastic change in Indian Economy, specially the
financial sector due to various reforms implemented by Indian Government. This
research work would be mainly focusing on the growth history of the Banking
Industry and the comparative study of growth in Public, Private & Foreign Banks with
respect to their Profits.
2.4 Scope of the Study
2.5 Objective of the Problem
2.6 Hypothesis
2.7 Operational Definitions of Concepts
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
10/14
10
2.8 Methodology
2.9 Limitation of the Study
2.10 Chapter Scheme
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
11/14
11
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
12/14
12
PROFILE OF INDUSTRY
4.1 An Indian Overview
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
13/14
13
-
7/31/2019 vinay proj wip
14/14
14
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Findings
The study finds there has been significant change in the performance of the banking
sector after the initiation of financial liberalization in India. Being a bank based
financial system; the banking performance has an obvious impact on the economy.
Using RBI data from the Statistical Tables Relating to Banks in India data base, the
study finds there has been significant transformation in the structure of the bankingsector. The relative importance of the public sector banks has been declining which
results in the emergence of the domestic private sector banks and more foreign banks.
The asset, the deposit and the credit share shows the share of public sector has been
declining and the share of the private banks going up, which implies declining
concentration and increasing competition. The indicators of profitability demonstrate,
all bank groups recorded an increase in the rate of profit and the foreign banks are
found to be the more profitable in comparison to the domestic private banks and the
public sector banks. The X-efficiency results show that there has been no significant
change in the level of efficiency of the public sector banks. There has been marginal
decline in the efficiency of the public sector banks in the post reform period. An
analysis of the post reform period shows, the domestic private banks are becoming
more efficient. However, taking the post reform period as a whole the study found
that the public sector banks are more efficient than the private and the foreign banks.
And the foreign banks seem to be the least efficient banks in India.
5.2 Conclusions
5.3 Suggestion
5.4 Implications