Upper limb fractures (part2)

116
Upper Limb Fractures Part 2 Dr. Apoorv Jain D’Ortho, DNB Ortho drapoorvjain23@gmai l.com +91-9845669975

Transcript of Upper limb fractures (part2)

Page 1: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Upper Limb Fractures Part 2

Dr. Apoorv JainD’Ortho, DNB Ortho

[email protected]+91-9845669975

Page 2: Upper limb fractures (part2)

• The elbow joint is a modified hinge joint formed by 3 separate articulations,– Ulnotrochlear(hinge)– Radocapitellar(rotation)– Proximal radioulnar(rotation)

Page 3: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Ligaments1- Radial collateral lig.2- Anular lig. Of radius3- Ulnar collateral lig.4- Transverse lig.

Page 4: Upper limb fractures (part2)
Page 5: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Ulnar ligament is also known as the medial collateral ligament. It

prevent abduction of elbow joint. It cosists of 3 bands: Anterior,

posterior, Transverse.

Radial ligament is also called as the lateral collateral ligament.it

prevent adduction of elbow

Page 6: Upper limb fractures (part2)

• The soft tissue restriants can be divided intoStatic stabilizersDynamic stabilizers

• Static stabilizers include:oJoint capsuleoLCL & MCL

• Dynamic stabilizers include Biceps, Brachialis & Triceps

Page 7: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Stability is contributed by:• Antero-posterior:

– Trochlea-olecranon fossa– Coronoid fossa– Radiocapitellar joint– Biceps-triceps-brachialis

• Valgus: – Medial collateral ligament complex – Anterior capsule– Radiocapitellar joint

• Varus:– Lateral collateral ligament is static– Anconeus muscle is dynamic stabilisaer

Page 8: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Two set of movements occur at the elbow:

A)Flexion and extension at the Ulnotrochlear joint

B)Pronation and supination at Superior radio-ulnar joint

Page 9: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Normal range of motion:0 to 150°flexion85° supination & 80° pronation

Functional range of motion:a 100° arc (30 to 130 degrees flexion)50° supination & 50° pronation

Page 11: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Dislocation of the elbowDislocation of UlnoHumeral joint

Mechanism of injury:Most commonly injury is caused by fall onto an

outstretched hand or elbow• Posterior dislocation: a combination of elbow

hyperextention, valgus stress, arm abduction and forearm supination

• Anterior dislocation: a direct force strikes the posterior forearm with elbow in flexed position

Page 12: Upper limb fractures (part2)

• Most elow dislocations & fracture dislocations result in injury to all capsulo-ligamentous stabilizers of elbow joint

• The capsuloligamentous injury progresses from lateral to medial (HORI CIRCLE)

Page 13: Upper limb fractures (part2)
Page 14: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Signs and SymptomsPain, Swelling and EcchymosisInstability, Crepitus and Deformity(With the elbow flexed at 90 degrees,the medial &

lateral epicondyles & olecranon process should from isosceles triangle)

A complete peripheral neurological examination for both motor & sensory functions should be done

Radial & ulnar pulses should be compared on both sides

Page 15: Upper limb fractures (part2)

ClassificatonAccording to direction of displacement of ulna relative to the humerus • Posterior• Posterolateral• Posteromedial• Lateral • Medial• Anterior

Page 16: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Treatment principlesRestoration of the inherent bony

stability is goal

Ulnotrochlear and Radiocapitellar contact.The LCL is more important than MCL in setting

of most cases of traumatic elbow instabilityMCL will usually heal properly without any

repair

Page 17: Upper limb fractures (part2)

• Parvin’s method Of Closed reductionPatient lies prone Physician applies gentle downward traction of the wrist for few min, as the olecranon begin to slip distally, the physician lift up gently on the arm

Page 18: Upper limb fractures (part2)

• Meyn and Quigley’s method of reduction:

Only the forearm hangs from the side of the stretcher as gentle downward traction is applied on the wrist, the physican gudies the reduction of olecranon with the opposite hand

Page 19: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Surgical repair (if elbow clinically is unstable post reduction)

Direct repair of the ligaments,capsule and muscles

Static or Hinged external fixator applicationCross pining of the jointTemporary bridge plating of the elbow

Page 20: Upper limb fractures (part2)

• If the elbow remains unstable inspite of repair to lateral structures the medial side of the elbow is approached with care taken to protect the ulnar nerve

• If the elbow is still unstable then an External fixator should be placed

Page 21: Upper limb fractures (part2)

ComplicationsVascular injury of brachial artery may occurNerve injury the medial ulnar nerve may be affected Myositis ossificans which is more common if passive

exercise is inflicted on the patient.Late complications

Stiffness Heterotopic ossification Unreduced dislocation Recurrent dislocation Osteoarthritis after severe fracture dislocation.

Page 22: Upper limb fractures (part2)

RADIAL HEAD FRACTURE

Page 23: Upper limb fractures (part2)

EPIDEMIOLOGY 4% of all fractures and 30% of all elbow

fractures 1/3 patients associated injury to shoulder,

humerus, forearm,wrist or hand.

Rare in children due to cartilagenous nature of radial head

Radial neck fracture more common in children

Page 24: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Anatomy of proximal radius

RadioCapitellar joint transmit 50-60% load across elbow

Page 25: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Radius Head Surgical Anatomy

Important for: Valgus Stability Posterolateral Rotatory

Stability Longitudinal Forearm

Stability (Along With Interossi

Membrane & Druj)

Page 26: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Elbow Stability

MCL & Ulnohumeral Joint: Primary Stabilizer

Radial Head & Capsule: Secondary Stabilizer

Page 27: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Mechanism Of Injury (1) Fall On Outstreched Hand (most Common) Distal Radius

Interossi Membrane(forearm)

Radial Head Impaction Against Capitellum

(2) Valgus Injury To Elbow/Direct Injury

Mcl Rupture/Olecranon Fracture Unstable Elbow

Page 28: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Signs and Symptoms Swelling Ecchmosis Anconeus Triangle Fullness Range Of Motion Restriction Stability Active Finger Extension

Forearm/Interossi Membrane Tenderness Wrist Tenderness

ESSEX LOPRESTI Lesion

Page 29: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Essex Lopresti Lesion

This is defined as longitudinal disruption of forearm

interosseous ligament,usually combined with radial head

fracture and/or dislocationplus distal radioulnar joint injury

Page 30: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Muscle Attachment Around Proximal Radius:

SUPINATOR ATTACHMENT AT PROXIMAL RADIUS. BICEPS TENDON ATTACH TO RADIAL TUBEROSITY.

Page 31: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Posterior Interossei Nerve At Risk:

Posterior Interosseous Nerve Traverses From Anterior To Posterior Through Supinator Muscle.

Always Check Pre Operative Active Finger Extension

Page 32: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Radiographic Findings STANDARD AP AND LATERAL X RAY of elbow OBLIQUE(GREEN SPAN)VIEW FOREARM AND WRIST X RAY IF REQUIRED

Page 33: Upper limb fractures (part2)

X RAY FINDINGS

Page 34: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Classification Of Radial Head FracturesMason classification

Type IMinimally displaced, no

mechanical block to rotation,intraarticular displacement <2mm

Type II Displaced fx >2mm or angulated, possible mechanical block to

forearm rotation

Type III Comminuted and displaced fx, mechanical block to motion

Type IV Radial head fracture with elbow dislocation

MORREY MODIFIED MASON CLASSIFICATION BY QUANTIFYING DISPLACEMENT AREA >30% AND DISPLACEMENT OF >2 MM

Page 35: Upper limb fractures (part2)

TreatmentGoal

Correction Of Any Block To Forearm Rotation

Early Mobilisation Of Elbow And Forearm

Stability Of Elbow And Forearm

Prevention Of Secondary Osteoarthrosis Of Elbow

Page 36: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Non Operative Treatment

Indication: Isolated Radial Head Fracture With Mason Type 1

(Undisplaced <2mm) Plaster Slab For 3 Weeks Early Active Mobilization Of Elbow Persistant Pain.Inflammation,contracture

Suspect Capitellar Fracture

Page 37: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Operative Management(Open Reduction & Internal Fixation)

INDICATION FOR ORIF: Mason type II with mechanical block(displaced) Large fragment >2 mm Mason type III where ORIF feasible(>3 FRAGMENT POOR

OUTCOME) Mechanical block to motion (lignocaine inj in elbow joint) Presence of other complex ipsilateral elbow

injuries(without metaphyseal bone loss)

FRAGMENT EXCISION LEADS TO INSTABILITY

TRY TO PRESERVE SMALLEST FRAGMENT

Page 38: Upper limb fractures (part2)

PRONATE FOREARM WHILE FIXATION

Page 39: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Which implant to use? Mini fragment screw(2.4 or 2.7 mm)

(counter sink must) Headless compression compression

screw/Herbert screw Low profile plate/mini t plate(in safe

zone/postero lateral) K WIRE

Page 40: Upper limb fractures (part2)

COMPLICATION OF ORIF

PIN INJURY

HARDWARE FAILURE

HARDWARE IMPINGEMENT

STIFFNESS OF ELBOW

RESTRICTION OF SUPINATIONPRONATION

Page 41: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Radial Head Replacement To prevent proximal migration of the radius Silicon implant poor outcome : SILICON

SYNOVITIS Titanium/vitallium metallic implant of choice

Page 42: Upper limb fractures (part2)

RADIAL HEAD EXCISION

INDICATION: Low demand, sedentary patients In a delayed setting for continued pain of an isolated

radial head fracture

CONTRAINDICATION: In children Presence of destabilizing injuries (Essex-lopresti

lesion,fracture dislocation elbow(mason type 4),monteggia)

Terrible triad of elbow(coronoid fracture,MCL deficiency)

Page 43: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Distal Radius Fractures

Common injury

Potential for functional impairment and frequent complications

Page 44: Upper limb fractures (part2)

HISTORY First surgeon to recognize these injuries

was Pouteau 1783. His work was not widely publicized.

Later Abraham Colles 1814 gave the classic description of “Colles fracture”

Advent of X rays at the end of nineteenth century contributed much to the understanding of different patterns of injury.

Page 45: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Incidence

One sixth of all fractures treated in the Emergency Room (16%)

Bimodal distribution less than 30 years (70% men) over 50 years (85% women) Males age 35 or older - 90 per 100,000

population

Page 46: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Introduction Occurs through the distal metaphysis of

the radius May involve articular surface. Mechanism of injury

forced extension of the carpus, impact loading of the distal radius.

Page 47: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Diagnosis: History and Physical Findings

History Wrist is typically swolen with ecchymosis and

tender Visible deformity of the wrist, with the hand

most commonly displaced in the dorsal direction less comonly in volar direction

Movement of the hand and wrist are painful. Adequate and accurate assessment of the

neurovascular status of the hand is performed, before any treatment is carried out.

Page 48: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Diagnosis: Diagnostic Tests and Examination

General physical exam of the patient, including an evaluation of the injured joint, and a joint above and below

Radiographs of the injured wrist-pa and lat view , oblique view

CT scan of the distal radius to know extent of intrarticular involvement

Page 49: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Osseous Anatomy

Distal radius – 80% of axial load Scaphoid fossa Lunate fossa Sigmoid notch – DRUJ

Distal ulna

Page 50: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Anatomy Scaphoid and lunate

fossa Ridge normally exists

between these two

Sigmoid notch: second important articular surface

Triangular fibrocartilage complex(TFCC): distal edge of radius to base of ulnar styloid

Page 51: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Anatomy Articular Surface

Scaphoid facet

Lunate facet

Sigmoid notch

Page 52: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Normal range of movement

Page 53: Upper limb fractures (part2)

RADIOLOGY

Ulnar inclination (avg 23°)

Volar tilt (avg 11 to 12°)

Radial Height (avg 11 mm)

Ulnar variance (+/- 1 mm)

Page 54: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Measurement of Radial Length and Inclination

Inclination = 23 degrees

Page 55: Upper limb fractures (part2)
Page 56: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Computed TomographyIndications:

Intra-articular fxs with multiple fragments

centrally impacted fragments

DRUJ incongruity

Page 57: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Common Classifications

Column theory

Gartland/Werley Frykman Weber (AO/ASIF) Melone Fernandez (mechanism)

Page 58: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Frykman ClassificationExtra-articular

Radio-carpal joint

Radio-ulnar joint

Both joints

{Same pattern as odd numbers, except ulnar styloid also fractured

Page 59: Upper limb fractures (part2)

AO/ OTA Classification

Group A: Extra-articular

Group B: Partial Intra-articular

Group C: Complete Intra-articular

Page 60: Upper limb fractures (part2)

COONEY (1990) UNIVERSAL CLASSIFICATION

Type I Extraarticular, undisplaced Type 2 Extraarticular, displaced Type 3 Intraarticular, undisplaced Type 4 Intraarticular, displaced

Page 61: Upper limb fractures (part2)

MODIFIED AO

Type A Extraarticular Type B Partial articular B1–radial styloid fracture B2–dorsal rim fracture B3–volar rim fracture B4–die-punch fracture Type C Complete articular

Page 62: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Column Theory

Rikli & Regazzoni, 1996

3 Columns: Radial, Intermediate, Medial

Page 63: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Three Column Theory

Radial ColumnLateral side of radius

Intermediate ColumnUlnar side of

radius Ulnar Column

distal ulna

Radial column

Intermediate column

Ulnar column

Page 64: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Classification – Fernandez (1997)

I. Bending-metaphysis bending with loss of palmar tilt and radial shortening ,DRUJ injury(Colles, Smith)

II. Shearing-fractures of joint surface (Barton, radial styloid)

Page 65: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Classification – Fernandez (1997)

III. Compression-intraarticular fracture with impaction of subchondral and metaphyseal bone (die-punch)

IV. Avulsion-fractures of ligament attachments (ulna, radial styloid)

V. Combined/complex - high velocity injuries

Page 66: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Assessment of X-rays Assess involvement of dorsal or volar

rim Is comminution mainly volar or dorsal? is one of four cortices intact?

Look for “die-punch” lesions of the scaphoid or lunate fossa.

Assess amount of shortening

Look for DRUJ involvement

Page 67: Upper limb fractures (part2)

EPONYMS COLLES #-extra articular or intra articular distal radius -

clinicaly described as dinner fork deformity-mechanism---fall on to an hyper

extended ,radialy deviated wrist with the forearm in pronation

Page 68: Upper limb fractures (part2)

SMITH #(REVERSE COLLES #) # distal radius with volar

angulation or volar displacement of the hand and distal radius

mechanism—fall on to a flexed wrist with the forearm fixed in supination

unstable pattern often requires ORIF because of difficulty in maintaining closed reduction

Page 69: Upper limb fractures (part2)

BARTON #

# disdlocation or subluxation of wrist in which the dorsal or volar rim of distal radius is displaced

mechanism-fall on to a dorsiflexed wrist with the forearm fixed in pronation

unstable # requires ORIF

Page 70: Upper limb fractures (part2)

RADIAL STYLOID #(CHAUFFEUR’S #, BACKFIRE #,HUTCHINSON #)

Avulsion # with extrinsic ligaments remaining attached to styloid fragment

Mechanism-compression of scaphoid against styloid with the wrist in dorsiflexion and ulnar deviation

Often associated with intercarpal ligament injury

Requires ORIF

Page 71: Upper limb fractures (part2)

ASSESSMENT OF STABILITYfive factors indicative of instability (1)initial dorsal angulation of more than 20

degrees (volar tilt),(2) dorsal metaphyseal comminution,(3) intraarticular involvement, (4) an associated ulnar fracture, and(5) patient age older than 60 years

Page 72: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Treatment Goals Preserve hand and wrist function

Realign normal osseous anatomy

Promote bone healing

Avoid complications

Allow early finger and elbow ROM

Page 73: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Options for Treatment Casting

Long arm vs short arm Sugar-tong splint

External Fixation Joint-spanning Non bridging

Percutaneous pinning Internal Fixation

Dorsal plating Volar plating Combined dorsal/volar plating focal (fracture specific) plating

Page 74: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Indications for Closed Treatment

Low-energy fracture

Medical co-morbidities

Minimal displacement- acceptable alignment

Page 75: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Closed Treatment of Distal Radial Fractures

Obtaining and then maintaining an acceptable reduction.

Immobilization: long arm short arm adequate for elderly patients

Frequent follow-up necessary in order to diagnose redisplacement.

Page 76: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Technique of Closed Reduction Anesthesia

Hematoma block Intravenous sedation Bier block

Traction: finger traps and weights Reduction Maneuver (dorsally angulated

fracture): hyperextension of the distal fragment, Maintain weighted traction and reduce the

distal to the proximal fragment with pressure applied to the distal radius.

Apply well-molded “sugar-tong” splint or cast, with wrist in neutral to slight flexion.

Avoid Extreme Positions!

Page 77: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Acceptable Reduction Criteria Radial length: within 2-3 mm of the

contralateral wrist Palmar tilt: neutral tilt Intrarticular step-off or gap< 2mm Radial inclination <5° loss Carpal malalignment: absent Ulnar variance: no more than 2 mm of

shortening compare to ulnar head

Page 78: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Indications for Immediate Surgical Treatment

High-energy injury Open injury Secondary loss of reduction Articular comminution, step-off, or gap Metaphyseal comminution or bone loss Loss of volar buttress with

displacement DRUJ incongruity

Page 79: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Operative Management of Distal Radius Fractures

Page 80: Upper limb fractures (part2)

External fixation: The treatment of choice for distal radius fractures

in the 1980’s

Page 81: Upper limb fractures (part2)
Page 82: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Spanning ( Ligamentotaxis)

A spanning fixator is one which fixes distal radius fractures by spanning the carpus; I.e., fixation into radius and metacarpals

Use for comminuted fracture

Page 83: Upper limb fractures (part2)
Page 84: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Complications

Mal-unionPin track infectionFinger stiffness Loss of reduction; early vs lateTendon rupture

Page 85: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Non-spanning External Fixator

Page 86: Upper limb fractures (part2)
Page 87: Upper limb fractures (part2)

External Fixation- Disadvantages -

Bulky

Poor screw hold in porosis and comminution

Screws do not buttress

Cutaneous radial nerve injury

Pin tract infection

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy

Page 88: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Percutaneous Pins

Page 89: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Percutaneous Pinning-Kapandji

intrafocal pinning through fracture site

buttress against displacement

Drawback-tendency to translate distal fragment in opposite direction

Page 90: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Useful for elevation of depressed articular fragments and bone grafting of metaphyseal defects

required if articular fragments can not be adequately reduced with percutaneous methods

Page 91: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Selection of Approach Based on location of comminution. Dorsal approach for dorsally angulated

fractures. Volar approach for volar rim fractures Radial styloid approach for buttressing of

styloid Combined approaches needed for high-

energy fractures with significant axial impaction.

Page 92: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Classical Henry approach(chung)

Extended carpal tunnel approach

VOLAR

Page 93: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Volar –Henry Approach

Page 94: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Freer elevator is used to elevate pronator quadratus

from radius

Fracture line is exposed

Volar plate positioned, insertion of first screw

Page 95: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Reduction and placement of Kirschner wires for provisional fixation

Page 96: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Courtesy J. Orbay, MD

Page 97: Upper limb fractures (part2)

-

DORSAL APPROACH

3rd DC –EPL(extensile)1-2nd DC

Page 98: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Dorsal Plating, PCP and Ex Fix

Page 99: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Generally not prefere because of high rate of complication like

- tendon dysfunction and rupture - tenosynovitis of extensor tendons indicated for- dorsal die-punch fractures or

fractures with displaced dorsal lunate facet fragments

Page 100: Upper limb fractures (part2)

DISTRACTION PLATE FIXATION

Page 101: Upper limb fractures (part2)

-less tendon irritation than dorsal

Volar Plating for Dorsal Fractures

Page 102: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Fixed angle locked screws ,,variable angle

Page 103: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Fragment Specific System

Page 104: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Five potential fracture fragments

radial column, dorsal cortical

wall, dorsal ulnar split, volar rim, and the central

intraarticular fragment

Page 105: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Radial pin-plate For stabilization of radial column

Ulnar pin-plate for stabilization of dorsal ulnar split fragment

Page 106: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Dorsal cortical wall fragment stabilized by small fragment

clamp

simultaneously stabilization of dorsal wall fragment and intraarticular component

Page 107: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Volar approach, application buttress plate

Page 108: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Dorsal approach, application of 2 “L” buttress plates

Page 109: Upper limb fractures (part2)

EPL Tendon

Page 110: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Extensor retinaculum repaired beneath EPL to prevent erosion against plate- EPL left transposed

Page 111: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Advanced TechniquesArthroscopic-Assisted

reduce articular incongruities also diagnose associated soft tissue

lesions minimally invasive

Page 112: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Complications After Fracture of Distal Radius

Arthritis/arthrosis Loss of motion Hardware complications Nerve compression/neuritis Osteomyelitis Persistent pain/pain syndromes (CRPS) Tendon (rupture, lag, trigger, tenosynovitis) Delayed union/nonunion/malunion Radioulnar (synostosis, disturbance)

Page 113: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Conclusions External fixators still have a role in the

treatment of distal radius fractures

Spanning ex fix does not completely correct fracture deformity by itself

Should usually combined with percutaneous pins (augmented fixation)

Page 114: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Conclusions new plating techniques allow for

accurate and rigid fixation of fragments

Plating allows early wrist ROM

Volar, smaller and more anatomic plates are better tolerated

combination treatment is often needed

Page 115: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Olecranon Fracture Forearm Fractures (including Galleazi and

Monteggia)

Page 116: Upper limb fractures (part2)

Commonly asked questions: Volkmann’s Ischaemic Contracture Reflex Symathetic Dystrophy (Sudeck’s

Osteodystrophy)

Important topics (must read): Bennet’s and Rolando’s Fractures Scaphoid Fractures