Understanding Capacity Needs Requirements for Different...

Understanding Capacity Needs Requirements for Different Stakeholders of Climate change Adaptation for Industrial Areas of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana

Final Report submitted to Integration by Administrative Staff College of India

.]

CNA for Industrial Parks of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana State I

Executive Summary There is now greater confidence and understanding of the consequences of anthropogenic caused

climate change. Recent reports from the IPCC, such as the fifth assessment report has provided

unequivocal evidence of the impacts on various earth system processes due to anthropogenic caused

warming. Another important aspect of climate change has been the occurrence of extreme climatic

events, recent studies indicate that the magnitude, frequency, and intensity of extreme events such as

heat waves, cyclones, droughts, and floods are expected to increase several fold in the coming dec-

ades. Therefore the CCA project will help taking measures proactively to adapt to Climate Change

and overcome the associated negative impacts and risks for continuation of business by industries

and industrial parks. The project will also help developing methods and tools, plans for climate-

resilient industrial area development and implement the measures on pilot basis in selected existing

and new Industrial Parks in the states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

A capacity needs assessment was systematically carried out as part of the CCA project to understand

the learning and skill development needs for the industrial parks of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

The transition to climate resilient development would require substantial knowledge up gradation, skill

development, and awareness among various stakeholders of the industrial parks in these two states.

A substantial number of officers, policy makers, and technical experts connected with industrial

development in the two states will require training to meet the needs of a climate resilient industrial

development future.

The United Nations describes capacity development as a process by which societies,

organizations, and individuals strengthen and maintain the abilities to set and achieve their

own development. A stakeholder mapping for the capacity needs assessment study

revealed that the important groups are the APIIC/TSIIC officials in the head office;

another group of stakeholders are the IALA officials and agencies responsible for the

day to day functioning of the industrial parks; the industry/entrepreneurs and

associations; and finally various state government agencies that are responsible for

framing policies with regard to industries in the states such as the pollution control

boards, agriculture, irrigation, industry, planning departments, and other

departments.

For this report, capacity needs are the gap between the existing responsibilities and what might

happen when climate changes trigger new desired responsibilities to adapt. Thus in the two states,

from the perceptions of the various stakeholders in the consultations it appears that approximately 25

CNA for Industrial Parks of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana State II

to 50% of the task and functions with respect to climate change adaptation is being performed

by various stakeholders, for about half of the remaining tasks and functions under climate

change adaptation it is required to be developed through training and other mechanisms to meet

capacity for C-C adaptation. For capacity with respect to engineering and infrastructure and planning,

about one-third to 45% of the tasks and functions are currently available especially among the officials

from the head offices, such as TSIIC/APIIC. However, a larger capacity gap exists for the tasks

and functions related to finance and planning knowledge, skills, and abilities, only about one-

fifth to one-third of the functions are available among the various officials in the TSIIC/APIIC head

offices

Based on the results of the capacity needs assessment, this report outlines a robust training program

to meet the gap in knowledge, skills, and abilities to meet the requirements of a climate resilient in-

dustrial landscape. It is envisaged that a sequential and modular approach to training maybe adopted

to meet the climate change adaptation needs in these two states. We have outlined three kinds of

training programs.

1. A one-day program for all senior officials from government agencies, industry, and TSIIC/APIIC.

2. A three-day program at an intermediate level for officials from government, financial institutions,

industry, and APIIC/TSIIC, and

3. A five-day program for developing advanced skills required for climate change adaptation with

reference to vulnerability analysis, financial aspects, planning aspects, and engineering and in-

frastructure aspects.

Apart from developing an enabling climate change policy for industrial parks of the two states and

mainstreaming it into institutional frameworks, and implementation through appropriate planning, an

important component would be building awareness and capacities among various stakeholders to

meet climate change adaptation in the two states.

CNA for Industrial Parks of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana State III

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We would like to express our gratitude to the various stakeholders in the states of Telangana and

Andhra Pradesh for their inputs in preparing this capacity needs assessment. We would also like to

thank Mr. Sreedhar IAS, VC&MD, APIIC, Mr. Narasimha Reddy, VC&MD, TSIIC for their kind support

in preparing this assessment.

We would like to thank Mr. Chenchaiah, Mr. CHVVS Prasad, and Mr. Lakshmi Kantha Reddy, Chief

Engineers of APIIC and TSIIC for their kind support. General Manager EMP from APIIC/TSIIC facili-

tated the various stakeholder meetings in the two states. Our thanks to Mr. Raj Kiran and Mr. Siva

Reddy for their help in managing the various stakeholder consultations.

Our sincere thanks are to Mr. Dr. Dieter Brulez, Dr. Peter Banks, and Dr.Sibylle Kabisch for their

support in preparing the various survey questions and guidance. We would also like to thank Dr. S.S

Varaprasad, former advisor, GIZ for his kind support. Mr. HrishikeshMahadev, Dr. Rajani Ganta, Mr.

Ganesh, Ms. Dhanalakshmi for facilitating the various stakeholder consultations and smooth flow of

funds for the assignment. We would like to thank Mr. Niroj Mohanty, Dr. Shaily Maloo and Mr. Vaka

Pundarinath from Core CarbonX for their support during the consultations and also sharing photo-

graphs of the consultations.

We would like to thank Prof. Srinivas Chary Vedala, Centre Director, ASCI for his guidance and sup-

port for preparing this report. We would like to thank Prof. Valli Manickam, Chairperson, ASCI for her

kind support.

Dr. Narendran Kodandapani Mr. G. Bala Subramanyam

Associate Professor Advisor

Environment Area Environment Area

Administrative Staff College of India Administrative Staff College of India

CNA for Industrial Parks of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana State IV

Table of Contents

List of Figures V

List of tables V

List of Annexures V

List of Abbreviations VI

1. Introduction 1

1.1 Climate Change: An Overview 1

1.2 About the Project 2

1.3 Stakeholder Analysis 3

2. Stakeholder Consultations 4

2.1 Approach to consultations 4

2.2 Measuring Capacity Needs 4

3. Capacity Needs Assessment 6

3.1 Stakeholder Mapping 6

3.2 Climate Change Adaptation Options 6

3.3 Required knowledge, skills, and abilities for CCA 8

3.4 Analysis of the Capacity Needs Assessment: Telangana State 13

3.5 Analysis of the Capacity Needs Assessment: Andhra Pradesh 16

3.6 A survey of CCA training initiatives for IPs from around the globe 17

4. Recommendations 21

4.1 Institutional frameworks for CCA 21

4.2 Contents of four Modules of CCA leading to Climate Safety Officer 22

4.3 Developing a training strategy for CCA in the two states 22

4.4 Preliminary Plan for Capacity Development Under the Project 25

4.5 Certification Programme 26

Annexure 1 27

Annexure 2 28

Annexure 3 33

5. Bibliography 35

DRAFT

CNA for Industrial Parks of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana State V

List of Figures

Figure 1: Stakeholder landscape in Telangana and AP industrial parks 7

Figure 2: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group industry in Telangana 15

Figure 3: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group IALA in Telangana 15

Figure 4: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group government agency in Telangana 16

Figure 5: Capacity needs gap for specific tasks and functions required for CCA in Telangana 16

Figure 6: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group industry in AP 20

Figure 7: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group IALA in AP 20

Figure 8: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group government agency in AP 21

Figure 9: Capacity needs gap for specific tasks and functions required for CCA in AP 21

List of tables

Table 1: Sampled Industrial Parks in Telangana 6

Table 2: Sampled Industrial Parks in AP 6

Table 3: Important CCA options to be performed by various stakeholders 8

Table 4: Specific knowledge, skills, abilities for positions among the stakeholder groups 9

Table 5: Stakeholder roles and responsibilities under Climate Change Adaptation 22

Table 6: Training programs to develop capacity of various stakeholders 23

List of Annexures

Annexure 1: Stakeholder landscape 28

Annexure 2: Focal interview questions jointly prepared by INTEGRATION/ASCI 29

Annexure 3: Questionnaire for CNA for CCA by TSIIC / APIIC 34

DRAFT

CNA for Industrial Parks of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana State VI

List of Abbreviations CCA Climate Change Adaptation

GIZ

APIIC

Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit

Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation

TSIIC Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation

CNA Capacity Needs Assessment

CE Chief Engineer

GM

P & A

General Manager

Personnel and Administration

LAC Local Authority

CGM Chief General Manager

AM

EO

Asset Management

Executive Officer

O & M Operations and Maintenance

FTAPCCI The Federation of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh Chambers of Commerce

and Industry

C-C Climate Change

IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

CCR Climate Change Risk

DRAFT

CNA for Industrial Parks of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana State 1

1. Introduction

1.1 Climate Change: An Overview

There is now greater confidence and understanding of the consequences of anthropogenic caused

climate change (IPCC 2014). Recent reports from the IPCC, such as the fifth assessment report has

provided unequivocal evidence of the impacts on various earth system processes due to anthropo-

genic caused warming (IPCC 2014). The globally averaged land and sea surface temperature shows

an increase of about 0.8 º C over the period 1880-2012. The Greenland and Antarctica ice-sheets are

losing their mass and glaciers are declining worldwide. The northern hemisphere spring snow cover

has declined in extent in several regions across the world. Arctic sea ice is declining rapidly at the

rate of about 3 to 4% per decade. Simultaneously, the mean sea level rise between 1901 and 2010

has risen by about 20 cm (IPCC 2014).

Despite natural causes of changes in climate, there is high confidence in the role of human caused

climate change on various earth system processes. Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions has

increased substantially since pre-industrial times and directly related to human population and eco-

nomic growth. A number of anthropogenic gas emissions especially, CO2 and CH4 have largely driv-

en trends in warming since pre-industrial times. For example concentrations of CO2 have increased

almost 40% since pre-industrial times (IPCC 2014).

Major contributors to the increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere chiefly come from cement

industries and thermal power plants through the burning of fossil fuels. Two main sinks for CO2 are

the ocean and land sinks.

Another insidious aspect of climate change has been the occurrence of extreme climatic events, re-

cent studies indicate that the magnitude, frequency, and intensity of extreme events such as heat

waves, cyclones, droughts, and floods are expected to increase several fold in the coming decades.

Globally, the number of extreme events has increased from 300 during the 1980s to about 900 during

2014, therefore almost a three-fold increase in the number of extreme events in 30 year period

(Economist, 2015). A recent UN analysis has found that about 100 million people were affected by

disasters in 2015, with climate being a factor in 92% of the events (Economic Times, 2016). Close to

one-fifth of those affected by these climatic events were from India. For 2015, the total economic loss

from disasters globally was about $66.5 billion; the economic damage for India was about $ 3.3 billion

(Economic Times, 2016). The economic loss from the recent Chennai floods has been estimated to

be about Rs. 48 billion, mainly from 50000 insurance claims (Indian Express, 2016). Insurance losses

due to Hudhud have been estimated to be about Rs. 25 billion (Indian Express, 2016).

While the impacts of climate change will be felt across all sectors, the following report is restricted to

industries and industrial parks. One of the mechanisms proposed to deal with both gradual climate

change and also extreme climatic events, has been through climate change adaptation strategies.

Recent studies indicate that the annual average adaptation costs for India in 2100 under various C-C

scenarios can range from 0.36% of GDP to 1.32% of GDP (Kabisch et al. 2015). While CCA may

have moderating influences on the impacts of climate change, it could also enable sustainable devel-

opment and also useful for disaster risk reduction (Kabisch et al. 2015).

In order to better prepare industrial parks of the two states to the impending challenges posed by

climate change, a robust climate change adaptation strategy is extremely important. Adaptation has

been defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as the adjustment in natural or hu-

man systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm

DRAFT


or exploits beneficial opportunities. Hence it will be important to understand how management ac-

tions can be developed, refined, and employed in the context of well-developed and flexible manage-

ment systems in order to enhance our ability to cope with climate change (Julius et al. 2013).

The main objective of the capacity needs assessment was to systematically examine learning and

skill development needs for the stakeholders in industrial parks of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

The transition to green, low emission, and climate resilient development would require substantial

knowledge up grading, skill development, and awareness among various stakeholders of the industri-

al parks in these two states. A substantial number of officers, policy makers, and technical experts

connected with industrial development in the two states will require enhanced training to meet the

needs of a climate resilient industrial development future. For example officials of Telangana State

Industrial Infrastructure Corporation/Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation will need to

develop skills in climate resilience for planning and managing industrial parks. Apart from developing

skills of these officers, officers connected with finance will need to be able to prepare proposals to

access international funds on climate finance. Officials of various departments such as the environ-

ment, industries, planning, will have to integrate climate resilience into planning processes. Techni-

cians and engineers will have to be able to develop skills to develop and design new technologies, for

example the ability to install technologies in solar power. There is now greater awareness among

nations that the challenges and opportunities posed by climate change in terms of organization and

management skills among officials and decision makers are lacking, especially the ability, knowledge,

and skills to be able to make decisions under uncertainty. Although, there are several tools to make

decisions under uncertainty, the human capacities and institutional structure are unavailable. Several

studies indicate that the major bottlenecks to implementing adaption measures in various sectors are

the human resource and skill gaps for implementation of climate change measures.

The United Nations describes capacity development as a process by which societies, organizations,

and individuals strengthen and maintain the abilities to set and achieve their own development. Ca-

pacity development can take place in three different ways, systemic, organizational, and individual.

Systemic refers to the creation of an overall enabling policy which facilities the capacity development

of organizations and individuals. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that the government of India,

has taken a number of initiatives, especially the National Skill Development program. It is possible

that a framework for developing capacities in climate change adaptation and climate resilience will

enable and foster development in this regard. Organizational capacity development refers to perfor-

mance and functions of institutions to be able to deal with climate change adaptation and also climate

resilience. At the individual level capacity development is targeted towards changes in attitudes and

behaviours through imparting knowledge and skills through education and training.

1.2 About the Project

The Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) Project for Industrial Areas of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana

States assisted by the German Government and is being carried out by INTEGRATION Environment

and Energy GmbH, Adelphi Consult and Ifanos Concept & Planning of Germany on behalf of the

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. This project has financial

commitment from the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) for

a 3 year period commencing from April 2015 and ending in April 2018.

APIIC and TSIIC are state level industrial infrastructure development agencies for identifying and

developing potential growth centres and industrial parks with developed plots/sheds, roads, drainage,

water, power and other infrastructural facilities in their respective states. There are about 257 indus-

trial parks in Andhra Pradesh spread over 13 districts, similarly in Telangana there are 118 IPs spread

DRAFT


over 10 districts.

This CCA Project will help taking measures proactively to adapt to Climate Change and overcome the

associated negative impacts and risks for continuation of business by industries and industrial parks.

The project will also help developing methods and tools, plans for climate-resilient industrial area de-

velopment and implement the measures on pilot basis in selected existing and new Industrial Parks in

the states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

The responsibilities and the tasks of the Climate Change Adaptation Project are to advice, train and

motivate the target groups so they contribute to an industrial development more resilient to climate

change. One of the Work Packages of CCA project corresponds to “Awareness Raising and Capacity

Building”, where key outcomes are to develop three modular training programmes based on the

methodologies and approaches developed under the project for the following topics:

Climate Risk Analysis and Management

Climate Resilient Planning New Industrial Parks and Retrofitting of Existing Parks

Implementation of Climate Resilient Measures

It is envisaged to develop a professional profile “Climate Risk Manager”. The three courses shall cov-

er the required training to achieve the certification.

In this regard, to understand the needs of capacity development for different stakeholders on policy,

technical, regulatory, financial, planning and implementation, managerial and organizational and other

processes, INTEGRATION has engaged the services of Administrative Staff College of India for carry-

ing out “Capacity Need Assessment Studies”.

1.3 Stakeholder Analysis

One of the first steps undertaken for the capacity needs assessment for climate change adaption in

the states of Telangana and AP included a detailed stakeholder analysis (Annexure 1). This analysis

included identifying the major stakeholders such as the TSIIC/APIIC; government agencies and or-

ganizations such as the environment agencies, planning departments; the entrepreneurs in the indus-

trial parks; and the industrial area local authority (IALA). The analysis also included a stakeholder

analysis of the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders and the individuals in these organiza-

tions. The stakeholder analysis also listed the various tasks and functions required for capacity de-

velopment for climate change adaptation and also collected information on the potential interest of

organizations to receive capacity development in climate change adaptation.

For the stakeholder analysis conducted, there were three main objectives

1. What specific climate change related tasks and functions need to be performed by staff of the

organization?

2. What knowledge, competencies, and skills are required and for which positions?

3. To what extent are the existing knowledge, skills, and abilities in the institution available to

meet the capacity needs for climate change adaptation?

DRAFT


2. Stakeholder Consultations

2.1 Approach to consultations

Stakeholder consultations were conducted in three IPs in Telangana State and in four IPs in Andhra

Pradesh. The criteria used for selecting the IPs in the two states were:

The exposure of existing IPs to climatic changes, especially extreme climatic conditions in

recent times such as severe cyclones, droughts etc.

Ranking of IPs done by INTEGRATION AND Core CarbonX

Types of industries located in the IPs

The method of conducting the stakeholder survey was, first a brief presentation was made to all

stakeholders on climate change and differences between gradual and extreme climatic events and

the impacts of extreme climatic events. The objective of the stakeholder consultation was then elabo-

rated in detail to the various stakeholders. Stakeholders were then divided into small groups to facili-

tate interactions. A set of focal questions formed a part of the survey (please see annexure 2 for de-

tails). Stakeholder perceptions were obtained on different stakeholder group’s level of knowledge and

understanding of climate change. Further, stakeholders perceptions on functions and tasks with re-

spect to climate change adaptation and the current capacity was obtained from these surveys from

the IALAs. In addition, to conducting a survey of stakeholder perceptions on capacity for CCA needs

within the IALAs, a similar interaction was conducted with various officials in the head offices of TSIIC

and APIIC.

2.2 Measuring Capacity Needs

Perceptions of stakeholders on the current capacity and future needs were estimated quantitatively.

Several key tasks and functions that would be required to be performed by various stakeholders were

assessed through a numerical scale. Data on various tasks and functions were collected based on

the actual current capacity, which we refer to as the actual score, similarly data on various tasks and

functions were collected based on the target capacity in order to be able to discharge responsibilities

under CCA.

AS = Sum of all tasks and functions presently performed by stakeholder group

TS = Sum of all tasks and functions expected under CCA by stakeholder group

Current Capacity = AS/TS

Capacity Gap = (1 – Current Capacity)

DRAFT


Higher the value of the capacity gap, indicate higher training needs

A similar method was adopted to estimate the capacity gap in terms of core functions such as finan-

cial tasks and functions, planning tasks and functions, and engineering and infrastructure tasks and

functions among officials of the head offices of TSIIC and APIIC.

List of Industrial Parks sampled for the Capacity Needs Assessment survey in the states of Telangana

and Andhra Pradesh are given tables 1 and 2 below

Table 1: Sampled IPs in Telangana

Sl. No. Industrial Park State Extent

(m2) Number of

plots Main industry

1 Hitech City, Madhapur Telangana 350719 35 IT Services

2 Cherlapally (I to V) Telangana 3371856 929 General

3 Jeedimetla Telangana 12066557 2620 Biotech, Phar-ma; General

Table 2: Sampled IPs in Andhra Pradesh

Sl. No. Industrial Park State Extent (m2) Number of plots Main industry

1 Kakinada AP 12341729 2431 General

2 Gajuwaka AP 3576625 1094 General

3 Gajulamandyam AP 2018111 246 Housing/General

4 Ongole AP 335400 122 General

DRAFT


3. Capacity Needs Assessment

3.1 Stakeholder Mapping

The Stakeholder landscape is given in Annexure 1. A stakeholder mapping for the CNA study re-

vealed that the important groups are the APIIC/TSIIC officials in the head office; another group of

stakeholders are the IALA officials and agencies responsible for the day to day functioning of the in-

dustrial parks; the industry/entrepreneurs and associations; and finally various state government

agencies that are responsible for framing policies with regard to industries in the states such as the

pollution control boards, agriculture, irrigation, industry, planning departments, and other departments.

Currently most of these stakeholders either have a cursory understanding of climate change and how

it would impact industries. Figure 1 provides a snapshot of the various stakeholders in the landscape.

Figure 1: Stakeholder landscape in the two states

3.2 Climate Change Adaptation Options

Adaptation options available to improve resilience of various stakeholders of the industrial landscape

in the two states can be categorized into three, planning options, finance options, and engineering

and infrastructure options. While the first two options are soft options, in the sense that they refer to

institutional frameworks, financial, and governance, the engineering and infrastructure options is hard,

Core organizations: TSIIC/APIIC,

IALA, Industry Contributing or-

ganizations: Plan-

ning, Finance, In-

dustries and Com-

merce, Environment

and Forests, Irriga-

tion, Municipal Ad-

ministration and

Urban Develop-

ment, Meteorologi-

cal department,

DIC, Town and

Country Planning,

State Pollution Con-

trol Boards, Reve-

nue others

Outer layer organ-

izations: FTAPCCI,

FICCI, NGOs, oth-

ers

DRAFT


in the sense that some concrete construction or design option is important. The various climate

change adaptation options to be performed by various stakeholders in given in table 3

Table 3: Important climate change adaptation options to be performed by various stakeholders

Tasks and Functions

Planning Planning to account for CCA, how to identify C-C risk and integrate

adaptation into planning; Resilient management practices for IP due

to C-C; Develop early warning systems; Mandatory inclusion of CCA

in EIA; Review current standards and regulations in the light of C-C;

Establish provisions regarding minimum width of buffer zones/no

settlement around industrial areas; Create enabling environment for

C-C; Include C-C aspects in guidelines, standards, building codes for

C-C; Integrate C-C in logistics, supply risks, identify critical compo-

nents; New work practices to reduce heat stress for outdoor workers,

drinking water, shelter for staff during C-C; Diversify markets, to dif-

ferent markets; innovate in new technologies, cooling technologies;

climate friendly products

Finance Encourage PP models of finance to reduce C-C risk; Insure assets

against extreme weather events; Communicate risks of C-C to inves-

tors; Review financing for inclusion of CCA in IPs; Communicate risks

to suppliers; diversify suppliers, multi sourcing; mobilizing funds for

CCA in industrial parks

Engineering and Infra-

structure

Manage drainage for run-off of excess water; Mitigate heat islands;

Intermediate water storage; water recycling; creation of green spac-

es/blue spaces; Storm reduction measures; separate storm wa-

ter/sewage; maintenance of drainage networks; Location of critical

infrastructure at higher elevations to prevent flooding; Renewable

energy/sustainable backup of power; Cooling for ICT facilities; In-

clude C-C aspects in designing of storage facilities; Develop shade

and cool storage facilities; Design green buildings; elevate buildings;

Thermal regulation of inside of industry; Design roofs of industry to

cope with storms; Increase water efficiency in production; Reuse

water; Increase resource efficiency in production processes, reduce

dependency on climate impacted raw materials

Source: Kabisch et al. 2015, Climate change adaptation for sustainable industrial development

DRAFT


3.3 Required knowledge, skills, and abilities for CCA

Apart from expanding and improving capabilities of various stakeholders, there is a need to strength-

en operational aspects for adaptation at different levels of decision making. Table 4 provides the

existing tasks and functions performed by various stakeholders/positions and the expected tasks and

functions in order to enhance adaptive capacity for industrial parks in Telangana and Andhra Pra-

desh. Capacity needs are the gap between the existing responsibilities and what might happen when

climate changes and the desired responsibilities to happen.

Table 4: Specific knowledge, skills, and abilities for various positions among the stakeholder

groups

Sl no

Stakeholder Current responsibilities Excepted responsibilities

IIC Head Office

1.

IIC Board and Senior leadership (Chairman; VC&MD)

Overall responsibility of or-ganization to carry out pro-grams and policies.

Approve quality manual and quality system procedures

Oversee the entire activities of the organization and to implement total quality sys-tem

Develop and adopt the policy state-ment on C-C &CCA

Create enabling environment for CCA

Budgetary support for taking up CCA projects / programs

Adopting management frame review systems to assess the damage in IPs due to extreme climate and as-sessing the corrective measures

2.

CE Planning and execution of

water, power, roads, layout

infra, wastewater, solid

waste


Planning to account for CCA, how to identify CC risk and integrate adapta-tion into planning

Planning new IPs duly addressing C-C Risks and integrating CCA measures in the project life cycle

Identifying C-C Risks in the existing IPs and developing site specific adaption measures and prioritizing for implementation

Inclusion of addressing C-C Risks and feasible adaptation measures in the environmental studies such as

DRAFT


EIA studies

Development of C-C indicators for management review

3.

GM (P& A) Prepare training needs


Planning for knowledge and skill development program on CCR&As for the officers of IIC and Industries

Planning for developing customized training calendar for IIC officers and industry personal on specific sub-jects such as green building con-cepts, greenbelt development, storm water management, rainwater recharge facilities, energy efficient fixtures, water efficient fixtures, non-conventional energy, disaster man-agement, insurance aspects, national and international practices on CCA

4.

GM (LAC) Property tax, building plans, civic amenities


Development of CC indicators relat-ed individual units

Addressing CCRs by the units in the IPs through conditions as a part of allotment letter; such as green belt, rainwater recharge, solar usage, internal drains etc to be developed at unit level)

5.

GM (MIS) IT, Statistics, Information


Communicate risks of C-C to inves-tors

Develop early warning systems

6.

CGM Finance Allocation of funds, Insur-ance, relief assistance


Review financing for inclusion of CCA in IPs

Insure assets against extreme weather events

Explore PP models of finance to reduce C-C risk

7.

CGM (AM) Manage assets

Including preventive measures to improve resili-ence to CC


Resilient management practices for IP due to C-C

DRAFT


8.

GM - Law Framing rules


Review current standards and regu-lations in the light of C-C

9.

CGM (IA) General Administration


Management framework review sys-tems to assess the damages in IPs due to extreme climates and as-sessing the corrective measures

Establish provisions regarding mini-mum width of buffer zones/no set-tlement around industrial areas

Include C-C aspects in guidelines, standards, building codes for C-C

IALA

10.

Zonal Manager Review, advise, supervise, guide overall function of IALA

Develop and maintain green and blue spaces

Manage drainage for run-off of ex-cess water

Develop intermediate water storage; water recycling

Develop and maintain rain water recharge facilities

Location of critical infrastructure at higher elevations to prevent flooding

Develop and maintain renewable energy at IP level

Develop shade and cool storage facilities

Mitigate heat islands

Reduce, recycle, and reuse re-sources

11.

Commissioner/EO and related officials

All matters in the IALA; ap-proval authority; maintain reports; records

12.

O & M Agencies Maintenance of facilities in IPs

Industry/Associations

13.

Senior Management CEO of industries, MDs, owners of the industries who manage industries


Planning to account for CCA, how to identify CC risk and integrate adapta-tion into planning

Insure assets against extreme weather events

Review financing for inclusion of

DRAFT


CCA

Management framework review sys-tems to assess the damages due to extreme climates and assessing the corrective measures

Planning for knowledge and skill development program on CCR&As for the Environmental Officer at unit level

Integrate C-C in logistics, supply risks, identify critical components

Diversify markets, to different mar-kets; innovate in new technologies, cooling technologies; climate friendly products

Increase storage of critical supplies

Communicate risks to suppliers; di-versify suppliers, multi sourcing

14.

Middle Management Manage the day to day activ-ities of industry

To plan and operate the CCA as-pects at unit level by incorporating BAT and customized to their need on aspects such as green buildings, elevate buildings, design roofs of industry to cope with storms etc.

Design, develop and operate green belt, solar energy, rain water re-charge systems at unit level

Storm water management within the unit area and connectivity to IP storm water network

Cooling capacities for processes and facilities to changes in exposure time

Increase resource efficiency in pro-duction processes, reduce depend-ency on climate impacted raw mate-rials

Inclusion of addressing C-C Risks and feasible adaptation measures in the environmental studies such as EIA / EMP studies

15.

IP Associations Agencies advocate favoura-ble policies at IALA

To advocate proactive policies on CCA at IALA

To identify the needs at IALA level and interact with IICs for its execu-tion

16.

FTAPCCI and other associations

Agencies advocate favour-able policies state-wide

To advocate proactive policies on CCA state-wide and to interact with the Government on the support needed for industry and IICs

DRAFT


Government

17.

Department Heads (Industries, Disaster Management, Fi-nance, Environment, Planning, Agriculture, Irrigation)

Creation of overall policy framework


Develop and adopt the policy state-ment on C-C &CCA

Planning to account for CCA and integrate adaptation into planning of respective departments

Review financing for inclusion of CCA in industry

Develop early warning systems with-in respective departments

18.

SPCB / SEAC / Plan-ning Department

Issuing consent to establish and operate/ Environmental Clearance to IPs and indus-tries and enforce the envi-ronmental norms for compli-ance through inspections and monitoring


Develop and adopt the policy state-ment on CC &CCA

Review current standards and regu-lations in the light of C-C

Mandatory inclusion of CCA in Envi-ronmental Clearances and permits for IPs by SPCB / SEAC and Plan-ning Department

Establish provisions regarding buffer zones around industrial areas

Develop guidelines for CCA and document industry good practices

DRAFT


3.4 Analysis of the Capacity Needs Assessment: Telangana State

The stakeholder consultations indicate that there is a need for substantial training on various issues

related to climate change among all the stakeholder groups (industry; government agencies; and

IALA functionaries). The stakeholder consultations and analysis reveals that for the stakeholder

group industry, capacity building needs varies from 68% in Hitech City to 75% in Cherlapally, training

needs do not appear to be substantially different between the three industrial parks, Jeedimetla,

Hitech City, and Cherlapally for this stakeholder group (Figure 2). For the stakeholder group IALA,

capacity building needs varies from 28% in Hitech City to 70% in Cherlapally, probably indicating

more training needs at IP Cherlapally (Figure 3). Similarly, for the stakeholder group government

agency, capacity building needs varies from 60% in Hitech City to 97% in Cherlapally, the higher val-

ue at Cherlapally may be considered as an outlier (Figure 4). Thus in Telangana from the perceptions

of the various stakeholders in the consultations it appears that approximately 30 to 50% of the task

and functions with respect to climate change adaptation is being performed by various stakeholders,

for about half of the remaining tasks and functions required under climate change adaptation it is re-

quired to be developed through training and other mechanism to meet capacity for CCA.

When it comes to specific tasks and functions related to CCA with reference to finance, engineering

and infrastructure, and planning, the stakeholder consultations provides interesting insights. For ca-

pacity needs with respect to engineering and infrastructure and planning, about one-third of the tasks

and functions are currently available especially among the officials from the head office, such as TSI-

IC. However, a larger capacity gap exists for the tasks and functions related to finance knowledge,

skills, and abilities, only about one-fifth of the functions are available among the various officials in the

TSIIC head offices (Figure 5).

For example specific training related to finance includes sources of funding for CCA, sustainable fi-

nancing training, green financing, green budgeting skills. With respect to engineering and infrastruc-

ture, a common training need pertains to development of early warning systems, whether for floods,

cyclones, heatwaves. Also infrastructure training needs include, underground cabling, development

of climate resilient roads, green belts, culverts, renewable energy technologies. Planning needs in-

clude development of master planning, including climate resilient measures at inception stages itself,

mock drills, risk analysis for C-C. An important training suggestion was made to include municipalities

in the training programs.

DRAFT


Figure 2: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group industry in Telangana State

Figure 3: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group IALA in Telangana State

DRAFT


Figure 4: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group government agency in Telangana

Figure 5: Capacity needs gap for specific tasks and functions required for CCA in Telangana

DRAFT


3.5 Analysis of the Capacity Needs Assessment: Andhra Pradesh

The stakeholder consultations indicate that there is a need for substantial training on various issues

related to climate change among all the stakeholder groups (industry; government agencies; and

IALA functionaries). The stakeholder consultations and analysis reveals that for the stakeholder

group industry, capacity building needs varies from 31% in Kakinada to 59% in Gajuwaka, training

needs do not appear to be substantially different between the industrial parks, Kakinada, Gajulaman-

dyam, and Ongole, however, marginally higher needs are required in Gajuwaka for this stakeholder

group (Figure 6). For the stakeholder group IALA, capacity building needs varies from 41% in Ongole

to 91% in Gajuwaka, probably indicating more training needs at IP Gajuwaka (Figure 7). Similarly, for

the stakeholder group government agency, capacity building needs varies from 67% in Ongole to

79% in Kakinada (Figure 8). Thus in Andhra Pradesh from the perceptions of the various stakehold-

ers in the consultations it appears that approximately 25 to 50% of the task and functions with respect

to climate change adaptation is being performed by various stakeholders, for about two-thirds of the

tasks and functions required under climate change adaptation it is required to be developed through

training and other mechanism to meet capacity for CCA.

When it comes to specific tasks and functions related to CCA with reference to finance, engineering

and infrastructure, and planning, the stakeholder consultations provides interesting insights. For ca-

pacity with respect to engineering and infrastructure and planning, about 45% of the knowledge, skills,

and abilities to perform the tasks and functions are currently available especially among the officials

from the head office, such as APIIC. However, a larger capacity gap exists for the tasks and func-

tions related to finance and planning, knowledge, skills, and abilities, only about one-third of the func-

tions are available among the various officials in the APIIC head offices (Figure 9).

For example specific training related to finance includes sources of funding for CCA, sustainable fi-

nancing training, green financing, green budgeting skills. With respect to engineering and infrastruc-

ture, a common training need pertains to development of early warning systems, whether for floods,

cyclones, heatwaves. Also infrastructure training needs include, underground cabling, development

of climate resilient roads, green belts, culverts, renewable energy technologies. Planning needs in-

clude development of master planning, including climate resilient measures at inception stages itself,

mock drills, risk analysis for C-C. An important training suggestion was made to include municipalities

in the training programs.

DRAFT


3.6 A survey of CCA training initiatives for IPs from around the globe

An important component of CCA is the building of capacity of nations, communities, individuals, and

the private sector to cope with the impacts of climate change (Noble et al. 2014). Governments at all

levels, whether national, state, local, play an important role in advancing adaptive capacity and also

resilience among various stakeholders. It is clear from the stakeholder consultations in the two states

that officials from the two states working in various agencies such the environment agency, the district

planning agencies, the local municipalities would benefit from the capacity building training programs

that are outlined in the report. For example, capacity of officials could be developed in such a manner

that they identify and implement local interventions, such as zoning, storm water management, and

building codes.

Recent assessment of climate change (IPCC 2014) suggests that during extreme climatic events, the

capacity of local institutions and individuals to intervene is a critical component is moderating the

harmful effects (Denton et al. 2014). Thus officials in the IALA will require a substantial amount of

retraining on various aspects of climate change, climate change adaptation, understanding before

hand the vulnerability of the IALA to various climatic effects. Similarly, the industry stakeholder group

requires substantial training for protecting the interests of industries in the IALAs, ensuring continuity

of supply and markets for their products. Further, the industry stakeholder group, can also benefit

from the numerous opportunities and spinoffs provided by CCA business opportunities. Nevertheless,

an understanding of the longterm risks of C-C and the early adoption of C-C adaptation measures

could further protect them and help them thrive in the market.

Specific interventions with regarding to engineering and infrastructure would be important for climatic

change adaptation (Klien et al. 2014). Many of the options available with regard to engineering and

infrastructure, include designing and constructing storm water drains, wastewater management, con-

struction of levees and culverts, seawalls, improving infrastructure to manage the effects of high

winds and flooding, are very often extensions of existing capacity of the various officials. From the

stakeholder consultations it is clear that the knowledge, skills, and abilities to plan and construct these

structures exist, mainstreaming climate change risk and designing these structures with future climatic

events is important. Thus the training in engineering and infrastructure that are proposed include

courses at three levels for officials of the head offices as well as the government officials and IALA

officials.

For planners of government policies and programs, specific programs on national and regional adap-

tation plans including mainstreaming of climate change into plans of the government. Similarly state

level plans for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana are required. Some of these measures include provid-

DRAFT


ing policy framework to guide decisions at the state level; providing legal framework; directing actions

in key sectors. Similarly, upgrading urban programs, municipal water management programs; disas-

ter planning and preparedness; planning not only at various spatial scales, but planning across sec-

tors such as natural resources, water resources, and other sectors are crucial for CCA. For planning

related training programs, technological inputs for CCA will be important. The use of ICT (Information

and Communication Technologies) can be leveraged by officials for top-down methods of communi-

cating risks related to climate change. Further, crowd sourcing can also be leveraged to inform

stakeholders through bottom-up methods such as to inform levels of floods to various stakeholders

(Mimura et al. 2014).

With regard to finance, several important training programs at different levels will be important for the

various stakeholders. Infact, stakeholders from the head office, both TSIIC and APIIC have clearly

mentioned the need for more training programs to access national and international finances for CCA.

In this regard, the Green Climate Fund (GCF) has been established with the objective to mobilize

about $100 billion per year by 2020 from the developed nations with the purpose of meeting the C-C

needs of developing countries (UNFCCC, 2007). The ability of officials in the head offices and vari-

ous government departments to be able to effectively tap these resources will depend on the

knowledge, skills, and abilities in green financing. Training programs that provide additional infor-

mation on financial incentives, including taxes and subsidies; insurance, including weather based

insurance schemes; creation of catastrophe bonds; payments for ecosystem service; differential water

tariffs; microfinance; and disaster contingency funds are all important for developing resilience to C-C.

Training may include information on sources of international and domestic funding mechanisms; pub-

lic and private funding mechanisms; debt and equity for climate financing; export credits and foreign

direct invests for climate change adaptation (Chambwera et al. 2014).

DRAFT


Figure 6: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group industry in AP

Figure 7: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group IALA in AP

DRAFT


Figure 8: Capacity needs gap for stakeholder group government agency in AP

Figure 9: Capacity needs gap for specific tasks and functions required for CCA in AP

DRAFT


4. Recommendations

4.1 Institutional frameworks for CCA

Institutions both formal and informal, along with the norms and rules laid out in them are important for

creating an enabling environment for CCA. These institutions provide incentives, guides, and struc-

tures that promote adaptation, adaptation capacity, and protocols for making decisions in CCA. CCA

will require clearly identifying roles and responsibilities for various stakeholders and also strengthen

decision making at levels that might have an enduring impact on CCA measures. Table 5 provides the

new roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders inorder to be effective under CCA

Table 5: Developing institutional framework for CCA

Stakeholder Institutional framework for CCA

Zonal Manager Develop clear role and responsibility for zonal manager for handling

environmental issues and CCA issues

Commissioner / EO and related officials

Strengthening at IALA or group of IALAs with dedicated EMP wing

with sufficient knowledge and skill to guide the member industry in

handling the environmental issue and CCA aspects

At IALA level assessing capabilities to understand specific impacts

is to be strengthened

O & M Agencies More awareness on implementing CCA measures in activities

Senior Management of Industry

Need for developing proper awareness for the top management for

better appreciation on impacts due to Climate Change and to plan

preparedness at unit level

Middle Management of industry To have specific responsibilities with respect CCA activities

IP associations Initiate advocacy related to CCA aspects

FTAPCCI and other associations Initiate advocacy related to CCA aspects

Department Heads – Industries / DMA / Finance/ Environment / Planning / Agricultural / Irrigation

Policy statements and framework should also address adequately

the CCA aspects – risks and benefits to the industry in general and

to the society at large

SPCB To take a proactive role, in addition to the role of enforcement , in

sensitizing and guiding the industry related to CCA aspects

DRAFT


4.2 Contents of four Modules of CCA leading to Climate Safety Officer

a. Module 0: Understanding importance of climate change adaptation for sustainable industrial

development

b. Module 1: Risk analysis and management

c. Module 2: Climate resilient planning and retrofitting of industrial parks

d. Module 3: Implementation of Climate Resilient Measures

4.3 Developing a training strategy for CCA in the two states

From the stakeholder consultations and also after interactions with various officials of the head offices

in the two states, a robust training program is recommended to meet the gap in knowledge, skills, and

abilities to meet the requirements of a climate resilient industrial landscape. It is envisaged that a

sequential and modular approach to training maybe adopted to develop the CCA needs in these two

states. We have outlined three levels of courses, at a basic level, an intermediate level, and an ad-

vanced level. Considering the time availability of the various officials, we would like to suggest that a

typical basic level course may be for a duration of a day, an intermediate level course for three days,

and an advanced course for five days. The training programs cover a range of topics such as climate

change, climate change adaptation, capacity building in climate change planning, climate change

finance, and climate change engineering and infrastructure. Table 6 lists the various training pro-

grams, the content of the training programs and the target audience for these training programs.

Table 6: Training programs to develop capacity of various stakeholders in Telangana and An-

dhra Pradesh

Sl.

No. Program Training Content For whom

1 Title: Climate

Change Adapta-

tion: An overview

Duration: 1 Day

Climate, weather, Greenhouse Effect; An-

thropogenic drivers of C-C, sources and

sinks of CO2; Important changes in climate

since industrial revolution; Future trends

and impacts of C-C on surface temperature,

precipitation, sea-level rise, Arctic sea-ice

extent; Overview of CC literature, programs,

institutions; Climatic extremes: Losses and

damages

Describe various sources of C-C finance

with focus on adaptation measures and

insurances; What are the national planning

measures for climate finance; International

climate change finance opportunities; Chal-

lenges and opportunities for accessing and

managing climate finance

All stakeholders in-

cluding head office,

industry, IALA, and

various government

agencies. The sug-

gested government

agencies such as En-

ergy, Forest Develop-

ment Corporation,

State Pollution Control

Board, Finance, Biodi-

versity board, Indus-

tries and Commerce,

State Leather Indus-

tries Development

Corporation, Infor-

mation technology

DRAFT


How to integrate CC methods into local,

state, regional and national planning initia-

tives. Mainstreaming C-C adaptation into

planning and retrofitting; How to cope with

risks; Roles of various institutions at various

levels in managing climate change; What

are the elements of a good climate change

planning methodology; International initia-

tives to support CC planning

Green infrastructure; concepts; best prac-

tices; case studies; Low impact develop-

ment; site design and replication

electronics and com-

munications, Municipal

Administration & Ur-

ban Development

(MS&UD), Town and

Country Planning,

Hyderabad Metropoli-

tan Development Au-

thority, State disaster

and planning society,

revenue department,

State remote sensing

application centre

2 Title: Climate

Change Adapta-

tion for IPs

Duration: 3 Days

Definition of adaptation; Consequences of

C-C for industrial sector; How to assess

vulnerability of IP; Measures of adaptation

for IP; Linkage between CCA and develop-

ment; disaster risk management; Interna-

tional case studies and initiatives imple-

mented; Best practices in CCA for indus-

tries

Site master planning of industrial parks;

Environmental, social, economic, and tech-

nical aspects of planning; Process of site

master planning; Concepts in green plan-

ning; Amendments to include CCA into the

planning process from site selection to sell-

ing of plots for industrialists.

Designing and revising drain and culvert

standards based on new precipitation re-

gime; Designing rainwater harvesting and

recharge points for precipitation regime;

Designing and managing power outages

through appropriate interventions; Design-

ing soft and hard mechanisms for sea level

rise

Including CCA into the budget process;

Framework to incentivize private invest-

ments; Coordinating local and external

funding sources; Decisions making and

economic aspects of CCA; Prioritizing pro-

jects through tools such as the cost-benefit

analysis frameworks; Multi-metric decisions

making for CCA; Non-probabilistic methods;

Financial instruments for CCA

Improving buildings/codes to cope with

All stakeholders in-

cluding head office,

industry, IALA, and

various government

agencies

DRAFT


extreme weather events

Understanding the need of green area to

cope with heat waves

For industries: Water management in the

processes, recycling of grey water

3 Title: Advanced

Climate Change

Adaptation for

IPs

Duration: 5 Days

Day 1: Vulnerability and impact assess-

ment for Climate Change Adaptation

Detailed analysis of vulnerability of IPs to C-

C; Includes the vulnerability assessment

framework; Monitoring vulnerability; Impacts

of C-C and their assessment; Determining

the options available; Prioritizing the op-

tions; Implementing and communicating

strategy

Head office stakehold-

ers; policy makers

from government

agencies; IALA offi-

cials; climate depart-

ment officials; plan-

ners

Day 2: Planning for Climate Change Ad-

aptation

Spatial tools for master planning; Genera-

tion of base map; land use map; contour

map; drainage and watershed map; flood

map; data sources and use of data; Moni-

toring, modeling and spatially integrated

tools for planning; Analysis of data; heat

island analysis; watershed analysis; model-

ing different environmental layers for identi-

fying site suitability analysis.; Technology

for C-C adaptation; Developing early warn-

ing systems; Seasonal forecasting of pre-

cipitation and increasing temperatures;

Municipal environmental management;

Smart growth planning networks

Day 3: Engineering and Infrastructure for

CCA

Management of storm and wastewater;

flood levees; seawall; methods on upgrad-

ing existing infrastructure; Retrofitting struc-

tures; buildings; Integrating climate risk into

initial design; Municipalities and C-C adap-

tation

Day 4: Financing for Climate Change

Adaptation

Preparing a detailed application for access-

ing international financing, such as the

green climate funds; Different kinds of fi-

nance options: loans, grants, equity; Insur-

ance and climate change

Day 5: Field visit and project work

Visit to an IP and preparing a full fledged

plan either through retrofitting or suggesting

new designs for climate resilience.

DRAFT


The one-day program would cover topics in climate change, CCA, climate change planning, climate

change engineering and infrastructure and climate change finance. This program is intended for sen-

ior level officers of APIIC/TSIIC, and other government departments. The objective of the program is

to create better understanding of climate change impacts and the need for CCA for sustainable indus-

trial development. Also, participants will be able to appreciate the need to develop climate change

policy statement and framework for implementation in their respective organizations.

The three-day program would cover topics in climate change, CCA, climate change planning, climate

change engineering and infrastructure, and climate change finance. The targeted participants are

senior and middle level officers of APIIC/TSIIC, and other government departments. The objective of

the program is to develop knowledge and skills in preparation or reviewing climate change policy and

plans for CCA. Also, participants will be exposed to the good practices in CCA. This course would

be relevant to stakeholders who have to perform tasks and functions related to IPs on a regular basis.

The five-day program would cover topics in climate change vulnerability, climate change planning,

climate change engineering and infrastructure, climate change finance and would have a component

of a field visit. This would be an advanced level course suitable for officials from APIIC/TSIIC, partici-

pants who desire to gain an expert knowledge of C-C and related matters, and also participants from

industry. An important component of this program would be a hands on exercise in preparing a plan

for CCA in industrial parks.

4.4 Preliminary Plan for Capacity Development Under the Project

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provides for important and immediate actions and im-

plementation of various targets related to climate change. For example SDG 13, provides for building

resilience to disasters and climate hazards, integration of climate in policies, education, awareness

and human and institutional capacity. Goal 17 of the SDGs clearly provides for capacity building for

implementation of the SDGs.

This report provides various levels of preparedness with regard to climate change adaptation, it is

also clear that there is variability and also different needs for various stakeholders such as the IALA

officials, the government officers, headoffice officers of TSIIC/APIIC, and the industry groups. It is

recommended that training programs of short duration, one-day should be implemented among the

various heads of departments of the government, such as the industries, agriculture, irrigation, and

other relevant departments to sensitise the decision makers to the importance of climate change, the

need for climate change adaptation, and other pertinent issues. Similarly, the top management of

industries in IALAs and also the various senior officials of the headoffice TSIIC/APIIC, and officials of

the IALAs such as the zonal managers, and managers should also be sensitized to the importance of

climate change. Once all the various stakeholders have a common understanding of the need and

importance of climate change adaptation, the second level of capacity building for stakeholders direct-

ly responsible for preparing and reviewing the actual CCA plans for the various industrial parks are

suggested.

DRAFT


4.5 Certification Programme

Quality Council of India (QCI) has been established as an autonomous non-profit organization to es-

tablish the National Accreditation Structure, jointly by the Government of India and the Indian Industry

represented by the three premier industry associations, Associated Chambers of Commerce and In-

dustry of India (ASSOCHAM), Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and Federation of Indian Cham-

bers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI).

National Accreditation Board for Education and Training (NABET), one of the constituent Boards of

QCI, offers accreditation to the Training Courses/Course Providers in various areas including Quality

Management Systems, Environment Management Systems, Occupational Health and Safety Auditors

etc. NABET also accredits EIA Consultant Organizations, schools, Industrial Training Institutes and

Vocational Training Providers. Any Training Organization (Institution – government, public sector or

private organizations) who intends to get the organization/institution accredited can apply to NABET,

for conducting various courses to be accredited by NABET. After the first year of successfully con-

ducting the various CCA programs, it is possible to approach NABET for accreditation.

DRAFT


Annexure 1

Stakeholder landscape

S. No.

Stakeholder Role/existing Key actor

TSIIC/APIIC Head Offices

1 CE Planning and execution of water, power, roads,

layout infra, wastewater, solid waste Key

2 GM (P & A) Prepare training needs Key

3 GM (LAC) Property tax, building plans, civic amenities Key

4 GM (MIS) IT, Statistics, Information Key

5 CGM Finance Allocation of funds, Insurance, relief assistance Key

6 CGM (AM) Manage assets Key

7 GM - Law Framing rules Key

8 CGM (IA) General Administration Key

9 Zonal Manager Review, advise, supervise, guide overall function

of IALA Key

10 Commissioner/EO and

related officials

All matters in the IALA; approval authority; main-

tain reports; records Key

11 O & M Agencies Maintenance of facilities in IPs Primary

12 Service Society Advisory body to IPs Primary

13 Senior Management CEO of industries, MDs, owners of the industries

who manage industries Primary

14 Middle Management Manage the day to day activities of industry Primary

15 IP Associations Agencies advocate favorable policies at IALA Primary

16 FTAPCCI and other asso-

ciations Agencies advocate favorable policies statewide Primary

State Governments

17

Department Heads (In-

dustries, Disaster Man-

agement, Finance, Envi-

ronment, Planning, Agri-

culture, Irrigation)

Creation of overall policy framework Secondary

18 SPCB

Issuing consent to establish and operate to IPs

and industries and enforce the environmental

norms for compliance through inspections and

monitoring

Primary

19 Planning Department Planning for the future in overall development of the state

Primary

DRAFT


Annexure 2

Focal interview questions jointly prepared by INTEGRATION/ASCI

1. What is your awareness and knowledge of CC such as?

a) Gradual increasing concentrations of GHGs since industrial revolution

b) Gradual increasing global mean surface temperatures

c) Gradual increasing sea levels

d) Greenhouse Effect

e) Sources and Sinks of GHGs

f) Gradual CC vs weather extremes (frequency, intensity, magnitude)

2. How can you relate to the definition (the process of adjustment to actual or expected cli-

mate and its effects (IPCC 2014) of climate change adaptation (CCA) in IPs?

a) Adjustment in natural or human systems

b) Response to actual or expected climatic stimuli or effects

c) Moderation of harmful effects and exploitation of beneficial opportunities

d) Adaptation, mitigation, synergy

e) Pollution and CC

f) Exposure, vulnerability

3. In recent times, have you dealt in advance or concurrently with a weather related event in

IPs such as

a) Floods

b) Storms/Cyclones

c) Heat waves

d) Drought

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

4. What were the proactive measures that you had adopted to deal with such extreme events

and to improve resilience to CC?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

DRAFT


___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

5. What were the reasons/arguments for implementing these measures in the IPs?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

6. If you were NOT effective in managing the effects of these events in the IPs effectively, what

were the reasons, please rank them on following scale (1: Critically important; 2: Very im-

portant; 3: moderately important; 4: Important; 5: Less important; 6: Slightly important ; 7:

not important)

a) Could it be lack of authority

b) Could it be lack of financial support

c) Could it be lack of a policy framework, guidelines, incentives, etc.

d) Could it be lack of awareness

e) Lack of plans

f) Lack of staff

g) Lack of responses of other actors

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

7. Can you please list the skills required to be prepared to deal with climate change (both

gradual and extreme climatic events) in IPs and can you rate them on the scale (1: Critically

important; 2: Very important; 3: moderately important; 4: Important; 5: Less important; 6:

Slightly important ; 7: not important)

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

DRAFT


___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Stakeholder Group: Governments/Planning agencies/DIC/Environment Engineers/PCBs

8. How would you score capacity of stakeholder Group of the with regard to extreme events

(CCA aspects) and to improve resilience to CC.

0 (Bottom score) No awareness, knowledge, skills, abilities

1 (Low score) Minimum awareness

2 (Moderate score) Awareness, knowledge, no skills, and ability

3 (High score): Complete awareness, knowledge, skills, and ability

# Tasks or Functions Actual

Score Target Score

1 Planning to account for CCA, how to identify CC risk and

integrate adaptation into planning

2 Resilient management practices for IP due to CC

3 Encourage PP models of finance to reduce CC risk

4 Insure assets against extreme weather events

5 Communicate risks of CC to investors

6 Develop early warning systems

7 Mandatory inclusion of CCA in EIA

8 Review current standards and regulations in the light of

CC

9 Review financing for inclusion of CCA in IPs

10 Establish provisions regarding minimum width of buffer

zones/no settlement around industrial areas

11 Create enabling environment for CC

12 Others

# Source: Kabisch, S., Bollwein, T., Bank, P., Brulez, D., Varaprasad, S.S., HrishikeshMahadev, R.,

Ganta, R. 2015. Climate change adaptation for sustainable industrial development: A strategy outline

for the implementation of the “Climate Change Adaptation Project (CCA)” in industrial areas of AP and

Telangana, India.

DRAFT


Stakeholder group: Operators/Developers/IALA

9. How would you score capacity of stakeholder Group of with regard to extreme events

(CCA) aspects and to improve resilience to CC




3 (Top score) Complete awareness, knowledge, skills, and ability

# Tasks or Functions Actual Score Target

Score

1 Manage drainage for run-off of excess water

2 Mitigate heat islands

3 Intermediate water storage; water recycling

4 Green spaces/blue spaces

5 Storm reduction measures; separate storm wa-

ter/sewage; maintenance of drainage networks

6 Location of critical infrastructure at higher eleva-

tions to prevent flooding

7 Renewable energy/sustainable backup of power

8 Cooling for ICT facilities

9 Include CC aspects in designing of storage facilities

10 Include CC aspects in guidelines, standards, build-

ing codes for CC

11 Develop shade and cool storage facilities

12 Others




Telangana, India.

Stakeholder Group: Industries/Associations

DRAFT


10. How would you score capacity of stakeholder Group with regard to extreme events (CCA)

aspects and to improve resilience to CC




3 (Top score) Complete awareness, knowledge, skills, and ability

# Tasks or Functions Actual Score

Target Score

1 Design green buildings; elevate buildings

2 Thermal regulation of inside of industry

3 Orientation of buildings away from S and SW

4 Design roofs of industry to cope with storms

5 Cooling capacities for processes and facilities to changes in exposure time

6 Increase water efficiency in production; Reuse water

7 Renewable energy sources

8 Increase resource efficiency in production processes, reduce dependency on climate impacted raw materials

9 Integrate CC in logistics, supply risks, identify critical compo-nents

10 Communicate risks to suppliers; diversify suppliers, multi sourcing

11 Increase storage of critical supplies

12 New work practices to reduce heat stress for outdoor workers, drinking water, shelter for staff during CC

13 Diversify markets, to different markets; innovate in new tech-nologies, cooling technologies; climate friendly products

14 Scale agro processing, to stabilize livelihoods




Telangana, India.

DRAFT


Annexure 3

Questionnaire for Capacity Need Assessment for Climate Change Adaptation by TSIIC / APIIC

1. How do you score capacity of various officers of TSIIC with regard to CCA aspects

and to improve the resilience to CC in IPs

0 (Bottom Score) No awareness, Knowledge, skills, abilities

1 (low score ) Minimum awareness

2 (Moderate score) Awareness, knowledge, no skills and ability

3 (High score) Complete awareness, knowledge, skill and ability

Sl.

No Description

Score

0 1 2 3

1.1 Understanding on climate change

1.2 What are the climate risks for Industrial Es-

tates?

1.3 What is adoption to climate change?

1.4 Why adoption to climate change needed for

IPs?

1.5 Adaptation strategies and options.

1.6 Adaptation options related to IPs and indus-

tries

1.7 Principles of sustainable industrial develop-

ment

1.8 Background on climate change and principles

of climate change adaptation in industries

1.9 Methodology for climate risk assessment

1.10 Integration of climate resilience in the planning

and management process of industrial areas

1.11 Best practices for planning climate resilient

IPs - technical

1.12 Best practices for planning climate resilient

IPs - management

1.13 Integrating CCA into planning instrument

such as EIA study

1.14

National Building Code of BIS / Design of

roads and drainage system resilient to ex-

treme climates / Design of buildings resilient to

extreme climates

1.15 Energy Conservation Building Code – User

Guide

1.16

Energy - Auditing / Energy conservation fix-

tures for reducing the net energy foot print for

IP

1.17 Adopting renewable energy for IPs, for meet-

DRAFT


Sl.

No Description

Score

0 1 2 3

ing the emergency requirements of both light-

ing as well as critical process / operations and

roof top solar systems to reduce the net car-

bon foot print of IP

1.18 Water environment - Storm water manage-

ment

1.19 Water environment - Rainwater recharging

structures

1.20

Water Environment – Auditing / Water conser-

vation fixtures / Common sewage collection,

its treatment and recycling for reducing the net

water foot print for IP

1.21 Case studies of CC Impacts on existing IPs

and TSIIC capacity for the adaptation

1.22 Identification of critical CCA factors for incor-

porating in the planning stage of IPs

1.23 IP layout planning duly addressing CCA re-

quirements

1.24 Green belt management

Aspects to be addressed through EIA study

for addressing CCA

1.25 Financing options and planning for CC Adap-

tion in IPs

1.26

Risk management for infrastructures of TSIIC /

APIIC (Insurance for assets against ex-

treme weather conditions )

1.27

Awareness of possible litigations that might

arise due to Collateral Damages caused by

CC in IPs, that could result in ill-effects of

health to surrounding communities, losses to

the nearby units etc, and probable / possible

compensations(e.g. could be similar to the

victims of Bhopal gas accident)

1.28 Rescue and Rehabilitation during extreme

climatic conditions

1.29 Knowledge and skill on creating enabling envi-

ronment for CCA

1.30 PPP models for CC adaption projects

1.31 Implementation strategy of TSIIC / APIIC poli-

cy on climate change adaptation

DRAFT


5. Bibliography

adelphi (2011): AdaptCap – Training Course. Climate Proofing Vulnerable Coastal Communities.

Powerpoint slide set for trainers.

adelphi/GIZ (2014): Facing the Impacts of Climate Change: Indian SMEs and Adaptation.

Kabisch, S., Bollwein, T., Bank, P., Brulez, D., Varaprasad, S.S., HrishikeshMahadev, R., Ganta, R.

2015. Climate change adaptation for sustainable industrial development: A strategy outline for the

implementation of the “Climate Change Adaptation Project (CCA)” in industrial areas of AP and Tel-

angana, India.

Mohanty, N. 2015. Preliminary screening of industrial parks in Telangana (As a part of the study on

baselining and selection of IPs for CCA project in the state of AP and TS). Published by Integration

and Core CarbonX.

Capacity Development Needs Diagnostics for Renewal Energy – CADRE. Volume II: The Toolbox.

Jointly published by GIZ, IDAE, IRENA, and NREL.

Noble, I.R., S. Huq, Y.A. Anokhin, J. Carmin, D. Goudou, F.P. Lansigan, B. Osman-Elasha, and A.

Villamizar, 2014: Adaptation needs and options. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and

Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth As-

sessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J.

Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova,

B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cam-

bridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 833-868.

Mimura, N., R.S. Pulwarty, D.M. Duc, I. Elshinnawy, M.H. Redsteer, H.Q. Huang, J.N. Nkem, and

R.A. Sanchez Rodriguez, 2014: Adaptation planning and implementation. In: Climate Change 2014:

Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working

Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field,

C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O.

Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L.

White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp.

869-898.

Klein, R.J.T., G.F. Midgley, B.L. Preston, M. Alam, F.G.H. Berkhout, K. Dow, and M.R. Shaw, 2014:

Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and

Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth As-

sessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J.

Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova,

B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cam-

bridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 899-943.

Chambwera, M., G. Heal, C. Dubeux, S. Hallegatte, L. Leclerc, A. Markandya, B.A. McCarl, R. Mech-

ler, and J.E. Neumann, 2014: Economics of adaptation. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adapta-

tion, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the

Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros,

D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C.

Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)].

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 945-977.

DRAFT


Denton, F., T.J. Wilbanks, A.C. Abeysinghe, I. Burton, Q. Gao, M.C. Lemos, T. Masui, K.L. O’Brien,

and K. Warner, 2014: Climate-resilient pathways: adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable develop-

ment. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral

Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental

Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E.

Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. Mac-

Cracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United

Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1101-1131.

Indian Express, 2016. Chennai flood losses.

Economic Times, 2016. Disaster Count.

IPCC, 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Work-

ing Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1327-1370.

UNFCCC, 2007: Investment and Financial Flows to Address Climate Change. The United Nations

Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), UNFCCC Secretariat, Bonn, Germany,

272pp.

Julius, S.H. West, J.M., Nover, D., Hauser, R., Schimel, D.S., Janetos, A.C., Walsh, M.K., Backlund,

P. 2013. Climate Change and US Natural Resources: Advancing the Nation’s capability to adapt.

Issues in Ecology.

DRAFT


CNA for Industrial Parks of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana State I

This project, assisted by the German Government, is being carried out by a consortium consisting of ‘INTEGRATION Environment & Energy GmbH, adelphi consult GmbH and ifanos concept & planning’ on behalf of the Deutsche Gesellschaftfür Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

Published by

INTEGRATION Environment & Energy Climate Change Adaptation Project (CCA), 1st Floor, ParisramaBhavan FatehMaidan Rd, Basheerabagh, Hyderabad – 04, Telangana, India www.integration.org Tel. +91 (0)40 66184019, Fax. +91 (0)40 23233677 Responsible Dieter Brulez, Director, CCA

Prepared by

Administrative Staff College of India, Bellavista, Hyderabad 500 082, Telangana, India

http://www.integration.org/

Understanding Capacity Needs Requirements for Different...

Documents

Transcript of Understanding Capacity Needs Requirements for Different...