Toward Civil War. Missouri Compromise - 1820 Applied to Louisiana Territory States would be admitted...
-
Upload
chaya-full -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Toward Civil War. Missouri Compromise - 1820 Applied to Louisiana Territory States would be admitted...
Missouri Compromise - 1820
Applied to Louisiana Territory States would be admitted in pairs – 1 “free” &
1 “slave” Drew line at 36° 30΄ - to the north – free
to the south - slave
Compromise of 1850
California – free state Utah and New Mexico territories – popular
sovereignty No slave trade in Washington, D.C. Strict enforcement of Fugitive Slave Act Settlement of boundary dispute between
Texas and New Mexico
Uncle Tom’s Cabin
Written by Harriet Beecher Stowe Expressed moral outrage at the institution of slavery
and the destructiveness on both whites and African-Americans
Humanized slavery & increased anti-slavery sentiment in north; was banned in south
When Stowe met President Lincoln in 1862, he is said to have exclaimed, "So you are the little woman who wrote the book that started this great war!"
Kansas – Nebraska Act 1854
Applied popular sovereignty to Kansas and Nebraska territories
Previously designated “free” territories – now the possibility that slavery could exist to north of line 36°30΄
Bleeding Kansas
Mini civil war when vote on fate of Kansas was taken
“Border Ruffians” 200+ killed, million of dollars in property
damage Vote → Pro-slavery 2 governments formed (1 free, 1 slave)
Dred Scott v. Sanford(1857)
Background– Dred Scott, slave, taken
into free territory by owner, then returned to slave territory. Scott sued owner believing that his presence in free territory made him a free man
Constitutional Issue– Was Dred Scott a citizen &
legally entitled to use courts? Did his presence in a free territory make him a free man?
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Decision– Slave defined as property (chatle), not citizen. Freeing him
would be violation of 5th Amendment due process– Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because
designating “free territory” could deprive an owner of his “property”
Importance– Step closer to Civil War (Congress can’t legislate,
Presidents unwilling to intervene, now Court refused to free Dred Scott & thousands in same situation)
– Dred Scott case
Lincoln-Douglas Debates 1858 Illinois Senate race
Abraham Lincoln: Republican, relative unknown -- opposed the extension of slavery into the territories (not abolitionist); “A house divided …” “This gov’t cannot endure permanently half slave and half free”.
Stephen Douglas: Democrat, incumbent U.S. Senator in Illinois – believed in popular sovereignty – “Freeport doctrine” – slavery could not exist if local citizens did not pass and enforce laws for maintaining it
Importance of Lincoln/Douglas Debate
Even though Douglas won the election, he lost support from southern Democrats
Lincoln gained national recognition and became a leading contender for the Presidential race in 1860
John Brown’s Raid at Harpers Ferry
Brown was a radical abolitionist Plan was to arm the slaves for a rebellion using
weapons taken from the federal arsenal in Harpers Ferry
Brown was captured, tried and executed for his role → martyr for the cause
The south feared the north had intentions of using slave revolts to destroy the south → harsher treatment of slaves
“Battle Hymn of the Republic” or “Glory, Glory Hallelujah” – originally was “John Brown’s Song”
– John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave;
– John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave;
– John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave;
– His soul's marching on! (Chorus) Glory, halle—hallelujah! Glory, halle—
hallelujah! Glory, halle—hallelujah! his soul's marching
on! – He's gone to be a soldier in the army of
the Lord! – He's gone to be a soldier in the army of
the Lord! – He's gone to be a soldier in the army of
the Lord! – His soul's marching on!
(Chorus)
John Brown, Abolitionist: “The Man Who Killed Slavery, Sparked the Civil War, and Seeded Civil Rights” – David S. Reynolds
Election of 1860
Candidate Political Party Platform
Lincoln Republican No extension of slavery; RR; Homestead Act
Douglas Northern Democratic Popular Sovereignty
Breckinridge Southern Democratic States’ Rights
Bell Constitutional Union Protect the Constitution and the Union of all states
Lincoln’s Election leads to Secession
States’ Rights theory – the states created the union of states, they can break it apart by secession
South Carolina leads the way with secession – followed by 6 other states (Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas)– Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina, Virginia
would secede early in 1861
President Buchanan
“lame duck” – from November of 1860 – March of 1861
Buchanan believed states seceded because Lincoln was elected – let Lincoln deal with it
Buchanan believed he as President had no constitutional authority to respond to secession
Result of Buchanan’s Inability to Act
Southern states secede Form the Confederate States of America Wrote a constitution (patterned on US constitution)
that supported states’ rights philosophy Elected representatives to the Confederate
government ALL THIS WAS DONE BEFORE LINCOLN TOOK
THE OATH OF OFFICE