The GDT-based fusion neutron source as a driver of sub ...inened/documents/Ivanov.pdf · The...

32
The GDT-based fusion neutron source as a driver of sub- critical nuclear fuel systems Presented by A.A.Ivanov Budker Institute Novosibirsk, FZD Rossendorf, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, VNIITF, Snejinsk

Transcript of The GDT-based fusion neutron source as a driver of sub ...inened/documents/Ivanov.pdf · The...

The GDT-based fusion neutron source as a driver of sub-critical nuclear fuel systems

Presented by A.A.IvanovBudker Institute Novosibirsk, FZD Rossendorf, Joint

Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, VNIITF, Snejinsk

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Layout of the talk

Physics of GDT–based neutron sourceApplication as a driver for sub-critical fission reactorApplication as a MA burner Possible re-optimization GDT-NS for application as a driverConclusions

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

3

Gas Dynamic Trap

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Basic principles of GDT operationThe Gas-Dynamic Trap is a version of a standard simple mirror whose characteristic features are – a very high mirror ratio, R , in the range of a few tens;– a relatively large length, L ,exceeding an effective mean free path, λiilnR /R, with respect to scattering into the loss cone.The warm target plasma is almost Maxwellian– behaves like an ideal gas in a container with a pinhole leakMHD-stable even though system is fully axially symmetric– non-negligible amount of plasma in the regions beyond the mirror throats, where magnetic field has favorable curvature– MHD ballooning/interchange modes limit stability at β 40-60%The electron neat flux to the end walls is suppressed by strong reduction of magnetic field in expanders

4

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Requirements to VNS for fusion materials testing

Fusion neutron spectrumAbout 2MW/m2 neutron flux or higher for accelerated testsSmall enough gradient of neutron flux densityContinuous operationAvailability more than 70%Reasonable tritium consumption

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Schematic view of the GDT-NS for the material tests

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Basic set of parameters for two and three component version of GDT-NS

Parameter Two component version Three component versionTritium beam energy (keV) 240 94

Deuterium beam energy (keV) - 80

Tritium beam power (MW) 20 6.5

Deuterium beam power (MW) - 8.5

Electron temperature (keV) 0.6 1.1

Plasma density (m-3) 2 x1020 2 x1020

Plasma radius at the center (m) 0.06 0.08

Mirror ratio 20 15

Central field (T) 1.25 1.8

Injection angle (deg.) 20 40

Max. neutron flux (MW/m2) 3.9 1.8 – 2.0

Power consumption (MW) 50 60

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Neutron spectrum in GDT-NS

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

GDT-NS: reference set of parametersPOWER CONSUMPTION - 47 MW

MAGNETIC FIELD IN MIRRORS, Bm = 13 T; MIRROR RATIO R =10

INJECTION ANGLE, θ = 300

INJECTION ENERGY - 65 keV

PLASMA DIAMETER AT MIDPLANE, 2a = 16 cm

RATIO OF ELECTRON TEMPERATURE TO THEINJECTION ENERGY Te / EINJ = 10 -2

MIRROR-TO-MIRROR, 11.4 mNEUTRON SOURCE INTENSITY – 7 1017 s-1

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Neutron flux density vs injection energy

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Neutron flux density vs electron temperature

Injection energy 65keVPower consumption 60MW

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Cutaway view of the GDT-NS

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Elevation view of GDT-NS

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Neutron yield profile in GDT-NS

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Neutron field characteristics

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

16

GDT device – general view

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Physics issues addressed in the experiments

Factors controlling electron temperatureMicrostability of fast ions Steady state operation Ballooning instability thresholdEffect of ambipolar fields on confinementEffect of plasma rotation/vortex barrier formationNon-paraxial effects due to high β

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

GDT device - important resultsMHD – stable confinement of plasma with β exceeding 0.4 is achieved in axially symmetric magnetic fieldStability of high-β plasma is demonstrated with external anchor cells (expander and cusp)Plasma stabilization by vortex barrier is demonstratedPlasma energy balance is determined by energy transfer from fast ions and losses through end mirrorsElectron heat conduction to the end walls is suppressed by strong reduction of magnetic field in expanderRelaxation rates of anisotropic fast ions are classical – no micro-instabilitiesSkew injection of neutral beams at midplane provides formation of fast ion density peaks near turning pointsPlasma is sustained during several characteristic times with extended neutral beams

18

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Measured axial profile of DD-reaction intensity

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

20

NB energy 65keV

Neutron flux vs plasma temperature

65keV injection energy

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

21

Electron temperature vs time

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

βmax ≈ 40%

nf ≈ 5x1019 m-3

22

Plasma β in steady stay with D0

beams

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Formation of vortex barrier

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

End loss reduction by fast ion density peaking near the ends

Peak density in local mirror cell vs trapped NBpower

Reduction of end loss current density with beam injection into local mirror cell

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

TeMean

ionenergy

Confinementtime

Injectedpower

Electron density

Experiment with max Te 230eV 8.0keV Transient

regime 3.5MW 1.5x1019m-3

Standard experimental scenario

160eV 10keV 0.001s 3.5-4.0MW 5.0x1019m-3

Fusion triple product (nτEi=2.0x1017keVm-3s)

Maximum stored energy 1.2 KJ

Maximum β <beta>≈50% at B=0.5TMaximum density >1020m-3

Values in bold are maximum attained ones.

25

Plasma parameters in GDT

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Existing GDT-NS version as a driver for sub-critical reactor

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Results of simulations

Neutron production in driver 2.4 1017 s-1

Overall multiplication factor ≤ 0.95Thermal power generated ~0.5GWNeutron shield for SS coils Pb+water

60cmFilter material Pb 10cm

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

„Energy amplifier“ proposed by C. Rubbia (1995):

• Accelerator↓particle beam↓

• Target↓neutrons↓

• Sub-critical system(arrangement of nuclear fuel)↓Strong neutron field inside thewhole volume of the fuel systemby means of fissions !

Release ofnuclear energy

Transmutation of nuclear waste !

(protons)

(heavy metal)(spallation)

Principles of an ADS:

Important features:

1. Sub-criticality: keff ≤ 0.98 !

2. No control rods !Power control by proton beam !

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Reflector

Core

● Driven sub-critical system, ADS, FDS ?z

r

Effective multiplication factor: keff

Sub-critical system: keff < 1 = 0Reactor: keff = 1 =const. > 0Driven system: keff < 1 ~ S

n

Accelerator

Introduction – Nuclear systems

pEp ≈ 1 GeVIp= 10 … 200 mA

Spallationn´s/p=10-30

Driven systems:keff determines the self-multiplicity of the system:

keff < 1: 0.95 ... 0.97

Meff=keff/(1-keff): 20 ... 30feff=Meff/ν : 6 ... 10

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

● Energy spectra of ADS and GDT neutron source:

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

total

n,2n

n,3nn,γ

10 MeV

Budker INPNovosibirsk

Joint Institute for NuclearResearchDubna

Consideration of GDT-NS for fission fuel systems

Re-arrangement of neutron production zone (elongation (keff<0.97) to L ≈ 5 m on each side gives: Sn=2.5·1018 n/s, Pfus=7.1 MW, Pfis ≈ 1400 MW, Pinp ≈ 200 MW)Re-optimization of operational parametersIncrease of electron temperature (Te higher than 1.5keV would provide higher efficiency than ADS)Reduction of axial losses by ambipolar potential peaks (demonstrated)On-site tritium breeding

K. Noack,et al, Annals of Nuclear Energy,35(7), pp.1216-1222, (2008)

P.Bagryansky, et al, Fusion eng. and design,70, pp. 13-33, (2004)