Syringes for gas chromatography

download Syringes for gas chromatography

of 4

Transcript of Syringes for gas chromatography

  • 7/29/2019 Syringes for gas chromatography

    1/4

    278 LCGC NORTH AMERICA VOLUME 24 N UMBER 3 MARCH 2006 www.chromatographyonline.com

    John V. HinshawGC Connections Editor

    GC CONNECTIONSGC

    Syringes for GasChromatography

    A bewildering variety of

    syringes is available for

    gas chromatography.Volumes range from 1

    L to as much as 2 mL,

    with many different

    needle styles and tips,

    plunger arrangements,

    and accessories. Syringe

    styles include both

    manual and autosampler

    types. Choosing a suitable

    syringe for a specific

    application can be

    difficult, especially if the

    inlet system has special

    requirements; choosing

    the wrong syringe can

    cause significant

    problems.

    n liquid chromatography (LC), the

    syringe functions primarily as a

    pipette or liquid-transfer device

    that loads a sample loop. The syringe

    generally does not take an active role in

    injection, which occurs only after samplehas been displaced from the syringe. The

    same is true of most gas chromatography

    (GC) gas-sampling valves the time at

    which the gaseous sample is injected into

    the column is separate from the moment

    that it is transferred into the injection

    system. In GC analysis of liquid samples,

    however, the syringe becomes an integral

    part of the inlet during injection: sample,

    in liquid or gaseous form, starts to enter

    the column as soon as the syringe enters

    the inlet.In GC inlet systems for liquids, the

    injection technique, choice of syringe,

    and inlet operating conditions all play a

    crucial role in the injection process. Two

    principal sample-transfer mechanisms

    move sample from the syringe into the

    inlet while the syringe is in the inlet.

    First, liquid-sample transfer takes place as

    the syringe plunger is depressed and liq-

    uid is expelled from the syringe tip. In

    cold injection, where the inlet tempera-

    ture is not high enough to produce sig-nificant solvent vaporization, this

    pipette-like action is the only major sam-

    ple-transfer mechanism. A competing

    process occurs in a hot injector, however.

    Within a few tenths of a second after the

    needle enters a hot inlet, sample begins

    to evaporate inside the needle. Bubble

    formation and concomitant increased

    internal pressures force some liquid out

    along with the vapor, so that part or all

    of the sample contained in the syringe

    needle volume is introduced into theinlet as a mixture of liquid and vapor. As

    the plunger is depressed, additional

    room-temperature liquid sample is forced

    from the syringe through the needle,

    which cools the needle and suppresses

    but does not entirely stop in-needle evap-

    oration. The needle heats up again oncesyringe plunger motion ceases, which

    causes additional sample vaporization

    from the needle into the inlet. All of

    these processes take place in a matter of

    seconds. The total amount of sample that

    actually is injected into the inlet depends

    strongly upon these two processes, their

    timing, the volumes involved, and the

    inlet conditions. Along with judicious

    injection condition control, a good

    understanding of the role of the syringe

    in these processes will help gas chro-matographers obtain better injections.

    Sample Distortion During

    Injection

    Syringe-needle effects influence not only

    the injected sample volume; they also can

    modify the relative amounts of individ-

    ual sample components that enter the

    inlet. To understand this secondary

    effect, consider that not all sample com-

    ponents have the same vapor pressures at

    a given temperature. Lower molecularweight compounds have higher vapor

    pressures, and conversely, heavier mole-

    cules have lower vapor pressures. This

    differentiation forms the basis for simple

    thermal fractionation of a mixture of

    compounds in a distillation column,

    for example.

    Unfortunately, for many gas chro-

    matographers, the same kind of thermal

    fractionation process can occur in the

    syringe needle during injection. When

    in-needle vaporization occurs, the lightercomponents vaporize first and leave the

    I

  • 7/29/2019 Syringes for gas chromatography

    2/4

    www.chromatographyonline.com280 LCGC NORTH AMERICA VOLUME 24 N UMBER 3 MARCH 2006

    syringe needle quickly. Heavier com-

    pounds take longer to evaporate and

    leave the syringe needle more slowly. The

    effect of initial needle heating during

    injection is remediated largely by subse-

    quent bulk liquid transfer through the

    needle: straggling heavy compounds will

    be rinsed out. At the end of injection,

    however, if the needle is withdrawn fromthe inlet before complete transfer of all

    compounds can occur, then the sample

    that enters the inlet system will contain

    more of the volatile components and less

    of the heavier components than were

    present in the sample before injection.

    This effect is called mass discrimination

    because it tilts the sample composition

    according to components vapor pres-

    sures, which are related largely to their

    masses.

    Two other thermal side-effects gohand-in-hand with needle fractionation.

    Many compounds are sensitive to ther-

    mal stress, especially in the presence of a

    hot steel syringe needle, and decompose

    rapidly when subjected to high inlet tem-

    peratures: high molecular weight glyc-

    erols are one good example. Polar com-

    pounds can become strongly adsorbed on

    the needle surface. Many of the polar

    polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as

    well as a host of chlorinated pesticides

    suffer from this problem. In both cases,the use of nickel syringe needles, or nee-

    dles that have been deactivated by

    advanced surface treatments, can help

    tremendously, as can deactivation of inlet

    liners and injector inner surfaces exposed

    to the sample. In these situations, ther-

    mally mild injection techniques such as

    cold on-column injection or pro-

    grammed temperature vaporization usu-

    ally produce results superior to what can

    be obtained by careful deactivation of

    needles and other hot injection materials,but the specialized inlets needed for these

    somewhat more complex techniques

    might not be available.

    Judicious data-system calibration and

    the use of multiple internal standards can

    compensate for inaccuracies caused by

    mass discrimination, decomposition, and

    adsorption, as well as for a host of other

    injection problems. However, the preci-

    sion and repeatability of multiple analy-

    ses are affected adversely when the rela-

    tive amounts of individual componentsstrongly depend upon injection condi-

    tions. Heavier components against

    which injection strongly discriminates

    or any other components that do not

    come through the injection process at

    100%, will exhibit degraded lower detec-

    tion limits (LDLs) as well. Degradation

    of precision, repeatability, and LDL are

    significant effects even for samples that

    do not span a wide range of volatilitiesand do not suffer from mass discrimina-

    tion per se.

    When this type of injection problem

    does arise, its effects must be either sup-

    pressed or controlled by applying special

    syringe-handling techniques or by using

    cold injection if possible. The sandwich

    technique is a good example. The syringe

    is first filled with 1 L or so of pure liq-

    uid solvent followed by a small air plug.

    The sample is pulled into the syringe,

    then another plug of air, and finally somemore solvent. The entire liquid array is

    pulled up into the syringe so that the

    needle is largely empty. Upon injection,

    only a little solvent is in the needle as it

    enters the inlet. Sample passes through

    the needle as the syringe plunger is

    depressed, followed by a plug of solvent

    that forces any remaining sample into

    the inlet. Only pure solvent is left in the

    needle at the end of injection, so needle

    fractionation does not occur. The draw-

    back of the sandwich technique is that itsignificantly increases the amount of sol-

    vent that enters the inlet, which might

    overload the inlet with solvent vapor or

    broaden the solvent peak and interfere

    with early-eluted analytes.

    A high-speed autosampler also can

    remediate needle fractionation. By inject-

    ing the sample in a very short time, typi-

    cally less than 500 ms and certainly

    much faster than a human can achieve,

    the syringe needle residence time in the

    inlet is insufficient for significant needleheating to occur, and so needle fractiona-

    tion is eliminated. Another benefit of a

    fast injection is the suppression of sensi-

    tive-component thermal decomposition

    or adsorption on hot steel needle sur-

    faces, again due to reduced contact

    times. Most modern GC autosamplers

    employ high-speed actions by default.

    In-needle fractionation and other ther-

    mal effects are some of the syringe-

    related processes that interfere with injec-

    tion accuracy and repeatability. There aremany other effects that occur before,

    during, and after sample has entered the

    inlet system: see the book by Grob (1)

    for a comprehensive discussion.

    Types of Syringes

    The choice of syringe type plays an

    important role in obtaining the best per-

    formance from a gas chromatograph.

    There are two basic kinds of manualsyringes: plunger-in-barrel (Figure 1a)

    and plunger-in-needle (Figure 1b). In the

    first type, sample is drawn up into a cali-

    brated glass barrel; in the second, the

    entire sample is contained in the needle,

    and a thin wire plunger fitted into the

    bore of the needle forces liquid out dur-

    ing injection.

    Plunger-in-Barrel Syringes

    In this type of syringe, sample is con-

    tained in the glass barrel (see Figure 1a).Because you can see the sample, it is easy

    to observe the presence of liquid sample

    and determine if the syringe needle is

    obstructed. In use, the syringe usually is

    overfilled with liquid, and the extra is

    then ejected. A final clinging droplet can

    be removed from the needle tip with a

    clean laboratory wipe or by rinsing with

    solvent. To gauge the injected volume,

    consider that the amount displaced from

    the markings on the syringe barrel does

    not include sample vaporized from theneedle and is only an approximation.

    The actual amount injected is closer to

    the needle volume (about 0.7 L for a

    10-L syringe) plus the amount dis-

    placed. Another way to determine

    injected volume is to load the syringe

    with sample, pull the plunger back, and

    read the total volume of the liquid plug.

    After injection, pull the plunger back

    slightly, read the remaining liquid vol-

    ume, and subtract it from the original

    amount. In this way, sample evaporatedfrom the needle is included in the total

    amount. Plunger-in-barrel syringes can

    be used for most routine applications.

    The common 10-L syringe can reliably

    inject liquid volumes ranging from 1.0

    L to 10 L.

    Plunger-in-barrel syringes can be

    cleaned in several ways. Pumping solvent

    in and out of the syringe is effective and

    can be a good idea between injections to

    remove leftover sample before it evapo-

    rates and leaves a film of residue behind.Eventually, a layer of nonvolatile residue

  • 7/29/2019 Syringes for gas chromatography

    3/4

  • 7/29/2019 Syringes for gas chromatography

    4/4

    fashion. These syringes tend to be more

    tightly integrated with the autosampler

    mechanics and are harder to replace. As

    mentioned previously, and worth repeat-

    ing, is the fact that autosampler syringes

    need better care than manual syringes

    because they are subjected to greater

    mechanical stresses and more operating

    cycles.Another familiar specialty syringe is

    the cold on-column syringe. This is gen-

    erally a plunger-in-barrel type with a spe-

    cial removable needle made of narrow-

    bore steel or fused-silica tubing. The

    needle is designed to penetrate a narrow-

    bore (0.20- or 0.25-mm i.d.) capillary

    column to accomplish on-column injec-

    tion. Such syringes are not interchange-

    able across different injector designs; the

    manufacturers specifications must be fol-

    lowed. On-column syringes can be moresusceptible to needle blockage because of

    their smaller inner diameters. Many on-

    column injectors use a precolumn or

    retention gap made of uncoated

    0.53-mm i.d. tubing, which accepts a

    standard 26-gauge syringe needle.

    Syringe Repair

    Many syringe manufacturers offer syringe

    repair kits, needle replacements, and

    repair service. Most removable needles

    can be replaced in the field if the rest ofthe syringe is in good shape. For

    plunger-in-needle syringes, needle dam-

    age often is accompanied by plunger

    damage, and in such cases, it is necessary

    to replace both as a matched pair.

    Syringe plungers generally are not

    field-replaceable (or interchangeable)

    because of the tight matching tolerances

    between plunger and barrel. One excep-

    tion is microliter gas-tight syringes with

    PTFE-tipped plungers, which will accept

    replacement plungers if the barrel is nototherwise damaged.

    Is syringe repair worth the cost? In the

    case of plunger-in-needle syringes, the

    answer is a definite yes. Repair kits of

    matched plungers and needles are one-

    quarter to one-third the cost of a new

    syringe. For the less-expensive plunger-

    in-barrel types, replacement needles are

    as much as half the cost of a new unit,

    and it might be worthwhile instead to

    attempt to reduce syringe damage and

    extend syringe life through better han-dling and cleaning procedures.

    John V. HinshawGC Connections edi-tor John V. Hinshaw issenior staff engineerat Serveron Corp.,Hillsboro, Oregon, anda member ofLCGCseditorial advisoryboard. Direct corre-spondence about thiscolumn to GC Con-

    nections, LCGC, Woodbridge Corporate Plaza,485 Route 1 South, Building F, First Floor,Iselin, NJ 08830, e-mail [email protected].

    For an ongoing discussion of GC issues withJohn Hinshaw and other chromatographers,

    visit the Chromatography Forum discussiongroup at http://www.chromforum.com.

    Syringe Accessories

    A few syringe and sampling accessories

    are especially useful. First, a syringe rack

    is a good way to keep syringes in one

    place, rather than on top of the gas chro-

    matograph or the bench, where they can

    be pushed off and broken easily. Syringe

    labels are also handy to keep track of

    which syringe is used for which type ofsample.

    Another useful item is one of the vari-

    ous repeating adapters that permit the

    plunger to be returned to the same posi-

    tion each time, which can improve the

    repeatability of multiple injections. Also,

    repeating adapters act as guides and pre-

    vent plunger bending or accidental with-

    drawal from the barrel, a feature that is

    important on plunger-in-needle syringes.

    Several manufacturers also make syringes

    with extended or reinforced barrels andplungers that prevent damage from a

    heavy hand.

    Conclusion

    When viewed as an active part of an

    inlet, the syringe takes on new impor-

    tance. While injection technique is cru-

    cial, the proper care and cleaning of the

    syringe can contribute significantly to

    improved accuracy and precision. Choos-

    ing the correct syringe to meet sample

    and injector requirements, and thenapplying and maintaining it correctly,

    can go a long way toward producing bet-

    ter and more reliable analytical results.

    References(1) K. Grob, Split and Splitless Injection for Quan-

    titative Gas Chromatography: Concepts,Processes, Practical Guidelines, Sources of Error,4th, Completely Revised Edition (Wiley,Hoboken, New Jersey, 2001).

    www.chromatographyonline.com284 LCGC NORTH AMERICA VOLUME 24 N UMBER 3 MARCH 2006

    Circle 40