RM Module 1 S2011

download RM Module 1 S2011

of 47

Transcript of RM Module 1 S2011

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    1/47

    Project Risk Management

    Module 1

    Introduction to RiskManagement

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    2/47

    Introductions

    Instructor: Hamid Faridani. PhD, PMP

    Email: [email protected]: 416 577 9331

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    3/47

    Project Management Processes & Knowledge Areas

    Closing

    12.6 Close

    Procure-

    ments

    4.6 Close

    Project

    Executing4.3 Direct & Manage

    Project Execution

    9.2 Acquire

    Project Team

    10.2 Distribute

    Information10.4 Manage

    Stkhldr Expect

    9.3 DevelopProject Team

    9.4 ManageProject Team

    8.2 Perform QA12.2 Conduct

    Procurements

    Planning

    5.1 Collect

    Requirement

    6.3 Estimate

    Act. Res.

    6.4 Estimate

    Act. Duration

    5.2 Define

    Scope

    6.1 Definie

    Activities

    7.1 Estimate

    Cost

    6.5 Develop

    Schedule

    11.1 Plan

    Risk Mgmt

    7.2

    Determine

    Budget

    4.2 Develop

    Project Mgmt

    Plan

    8.1 Plan

    Quality

    12.1 Plan

    Procurement

    10.1 Plan

    Comm.

    11.2 Identify

    Risks

    11.3 Perform

    Qual. Risk

    Analysis

    11.4 Perform

    Quant. Risk

    Analysis

    11.5 Plan Risk

    Resp.

    12.2 Plan

    Contracting

    5.3 Create

    WBS

    6.2 Sequence

    Activities

    9.1 Dev. HR

    Plan

    Initiating

    4.1 Dev. Prj

    Charter

    10.1 Id.

    Stakehldrs

    Monitoring and Controlling

    4.4 Monitor &

    Control Work

    4.5 Perform

    Int. Chg. Ctl

    5.4 VerifyScope

    5.5 Control

    Scope

    7.3 ControlCosts

    8.3 Perform

    Quality Cont.

    12.3 Admin.

    Procurement

    6.6 Control

    Schedule

    10.3 Report

    Performance

    10.4 Manage

    Stakeholders

    .

    11.6 Mon +Ctl Risks

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    4/47

    Managed andMitigatedProject Risks

    High qualityProjectProcesses and

    Practices

    Successful

    Projects

    The Link between Project Risk and Quality

    Management and Project Success

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    5/47

    Measures of Projects Success

    Plan & execute

    Project to deliver

    Project Success: Level 1Was the project done right?

    Project Success: Level 2Was the right project done?

    Project Success: Level 3Were the right projects done right,

    time after time?

    Product Value or

    Benefit

    Use product to

    produce

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    6/47

    Measures of Projects Success

    Success Level Typical Criteria forSuccess

    Possible Critical Success Factors

    (Inputs)

    OrganizationalAccountability

    Level 1: ProjectManagement Success

    Was the project done

    right?

    Time

    Cost

    Quality

    Scope

    Safety

    Clear & doable goals

    Effective project team

    Adequate resources

    Clear technical performancerequirements

    Effective planning & control Risk & quality management

    Project Manager

    PMO

    Level 2: Project Success

    Was the right project

    done?

    ROIC

    IRR

    Other financialindicators

    Stakeholderssatisfaction

    Clear & doable goals

    Stakeholders commitment &attitude

    Effective benefits realization andmanagement

    Appropriate operational strategy

    Project sponsor

    Client, owner oroperator

    Level 3: ConsistentProjects Success

    Were the right projects

    done right, time aftertime?

    Maturity of PM cultureand practices

    Incorporation ofknowledge management

    Productivity ofcorporate resources

    Incorporation of qualitymanagement culture inorganization

    Effective portfolio management

    Comprehensive use of metrics

    Shareholders

    Seniormanagement

    Portfoliomanagers

    Project Success Indicators and Factors

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    7/47

    Risk in Projects: The Why Question

    Uniqueness: There arealways some projectcomponents or sub projectsthat have not been donebefore.

    Deliverables: Products orservices developed oftencannot meet shiftingcustomer expectations

    Assumptions: By their very

    nature, involve uncertainty,and hence risks

    Stakeholders: Theconflicting expectations ofvarious stakeholdersrepresent risk factors

    Conflicting Constraints oftime, cost and scope.

    Organizations and People:The unpredictable andconflicting needs of teams

    working on projects Project Environment and

    Change: Change involvesuncertainty and risk

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    8/47

    The Nature of Risk

    Risks are associated withuncertainty concerning theassumptions made about

    projects activities such as theirduration, cost and performancerequirements.

    Uncertainty will eventually affect

    a projects objectives and henceits success: Negatively, resulting in threats

    Positively, resulting inopportunities

    Thinking outside thebox involves uncertaintyand risks

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    9/47

    The Dimensions of Risk

    Impact

    Cause orTrigger

    Risk Driver: Definitefact about the project orits environment

    Risk Event: Uncertainsituation that if it occurscan have an impact onthe projects objectives

    Risk Effect:Contingent effect of riskon project objectives

    Trigger: Use ofunionized workers in aconstruction project

    Risk Event: Unionstrike during projectimplementation

    Impact: Delay in projectschedule and possibleassociated penaltiesand costs

    Risk

    Impact

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    10/47

    Sources of Uncertainty in Projects

    Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

    ProjectRisk

    Management Corporate Experience Organizational & Financial Culture

    Customer History & Requirements

    Loyalty

    External NaturalEnvironment

    Physical Environment

    Facilities & Services

    Socio-Cultural Government and Politics

    The Legal Environment

    Economic Structure of the Economy

    Labour and Financial Markets

    Technology Requirements &Performance

    Scope uncertainty & Complexity

    Technology Maturity and Limits

    Applications Organizational Experience

    Physical Infrastructure

    Personnel Experience

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    11/47

    Relationship between Risk and Objectives

    Type of Risk Corresponding Objectives

    Project Risk is any uncertainty that, ifoccurs, would affect one or more of theprojects objectives.

    Scope, time, cost, performance, quality and clientsatisfaction

    Business Risk is any uncertainty that,if occurs, would affect one or more of thebusiness objectives.

    Profitability, market share, competitiveness,Internal Rate of Return IRR, reputation, repeatbusiness, share price and others

    Safety Risk is any uncertainty that, ifoccurs, would affect one or more of thesafety objectives.

    Low accident rate, minimal lost days, reducedinsurance premiums, regulatory and legalcompliance

    Product Technical Risk is anyuncertainty that, if occurs, would affectone or more of the product technicalobjectives.

    Performance, functionality, serviceability reliability,and maintainability of the product

    Security Risk is any uncertainty that, ifoccurs, would affect one or more of thesecurity objectives.

    Physical plant security, personnel and assetsecurity, and information security

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    12/47

    Project Risk Management (PMBoK)

    Project Risk Management PRM is thesystematic process of identifying,analyzing, and responding to project risks.It includes

    PRM includes maximizing the probability

    and consequences of positive events(opportunities); and minimizing theprobabilities and consequences of negativeevents (threats)

    An Opportunity is not the absence of theabsence of threat. Distinctive opportunities

    exist in their own right presenting a chanceto deliver the projects product early, at a

    lower cost and, therefore, increasingcustomer satisfaction.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    13/47

    Threats and Opportunities in Projects

    ProjectObjectives:Cost orSchedule

    20

    40

    80

    100

    60

    Target value

    Normal VariationsOpportunity

    Zone

    ThreatZone

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    14/47

    The Definition of Risk

    ThreatAny uncertainty that, if itoccurs, would affect one

    or more of the projectsobjectives negatively

    OpportunityAny uncertainty that, ifit occurs, would affect

    one or more of theprojects objectivespositively

    RiskAny uncertainty that, if it occurs,would affect one or more of the

    projects objectives

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    15/47

    Uncertainty in Project Activities Risks in a project arise because the cost, duration and

    outcome of projects activities involve a degree ofuncertainty. The uncertainty is defined in terms of aprobability distribution.

    Probability

    Cost or Duration Estimate x

    10Least

    Likely x1

    15Most

    Likely x2

    25Least

    Likely x3

    The estimated value is a function ofx1, x2 and x3

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    16/47

    Risk and Decision Making Cost Benefit Analysis: A risky

    course of action should only betaken when the potential benefitand chance of winning exceed theremedial cost of an unsuccessfuldecision and chances of loosing bya acceptable margin

    The risk taker should obtainanswers to: Why should the risk be taken? What will be gained? What could be lost?

    What are the chances of success andfailure?

    What can be done if the desired result

    is not achieved? Is the potential reward worth the risk?

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    17/47

    Risk and Decision MakersRisk elements that tend to

    Attract and/or determine the

    Response attitudes of decision

    makers include:

    Potential frequency of loss

    Amount and reliability ofinformation available

    Severity of potential loss

    Vividness of the consequences

    Potential for (adverse) publicity

    Ability to measure theconsequences

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    18/47

    Risk Management is Proactive

    Project risk management should beadvance preparation for possible adverseevents, rather than responding as theyhappen though both may be needed.

    Crisis Management (reactive mode)consists of taking the appropriateresponse if an event occurs.

    Anticipation and Planning (proactivemode) makes it possible we hope to

    avoid this situation in the first place byplanning an appropriate response shouldthe adverse event take place.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    19/47

    Venture Risk vs. Project RiskVenture Risk:

    Analyzing informationand selecting the rightproject

    Will the project results beas effective as originallyplanned?

    Will the market for theproduct/service exist tothe same degree thatwas forecast?

    Project Risk:

    Managing uncertainty tomeet the projectobjectives

    Can we complete theproject on schedule?

    Will the project results

    meet the agreedrequirements?

    Can we remain within theapproved budget?

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    20/47

    The Dimensions of Risk

    Probability

    Statistical likelihood of aspecific event taking place

    Impact Damage or benefits that will

    result if that event occurs

    Conditions or Context Timing and situation should

    the event occur

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    21/47

    Probability of a Risk Event

    Expresses the likelihood of an eventtaking place

    Based on scientific observation ofsimilar events, review of scenarios,

    analysis of a situation, etc. Useful in many business areas,

    including insurance, investments,gaming, etc.

    Dependent on accuracy of the

    information available: Weatherforecast compared to gambling odds Can be expressed as a percentage or

    a decimal Often expressed in relative terms

    (likely unlikely)

    P(6 and 4) = P(6). P(4)= (1/6).(1/6)= 1/36= 2.7 %

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    22/47

    Probability as a Measure of Uncertainty

    Uncertainty in commonterminology is oftenexpressed by phrases suchas: not very likely or highly unlikely

    better than even or probable

    for sure or highly likely

    Probability is stated on a

    scale from 0 to 1 0 probability indicates an event has

    no chance of occurring

    1 probability indicates an event isabsolutely sure to occur

    P( Rain) > 90% during themonsoon season in SouthAsia

    P (Rain) < 10% in the summer

    in North Africa

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    23/47

    The Risk Value

    Impact: The magnitude of consequences

    The amount at stake; the extent of adverse orpositive consequences which might affect the

    projects objectives of: Scope (S), Cost (C),Schedule (T) and Quality (Q)

    Probability: The likelihood of occurrence

    The ratio of the number of chances that an event

    may happen, to the sum of the chances of it bothhappening and not happening

    Risk Value = Probability x Impact

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    24/47

    Impact of a risk event Description of the consequences (benefit or

    loss) that will result, should the event takeplace: Impact is not related to theprobability of that event

    Often expressed in financial terms, but can

    also affect other aspects of the organizationor project:Cost impact is expressed in sameunits as the budget.

    Estimate is based on scientific observationof similar events, review of scenarios,analysis of a situation

    May be easy or difficult to estimate thedegree of impact Estimate assumes that only normal

    safeguards are in place Depends on the conditions in effect

    when/if the event occurs

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    25/47

    Simple Risk Assessment Matrix

    Low priorityrisks

    Third priorityrisks

    Second priorityrisks

    First priorityrisks

    Probability

    ImpactLow

    Low

    High

    High

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    26/47

    Risk Factors in the Project Life Cycle

    Project risk factors changeduring the life cycle

    During project planning, theprobability of opportunity orthreat remain high, but the

    amount at stake (investment)is low

    During projectimplementation, theprobability of opportunity orthreat progressively falls as

    the unknowns becomeknowns, but the amount atstake rises steadily asresources are invested

    Highest vulnerability to risk isduring the last two phases ofthe life cycle

    Opportunity and Risk

    Amount at Stake

    Plan Accomplish

    Phase 1CONCEPT

    Conceive (C)

    Phase 2DEVELOPMENT

    Develop (C)

    Phase 3IMPLEMENTATION

    Execute (E)

    Phase 4TERMINATION

    Finish (F)

    TIME

    INCREASINGR

    ISK

    $VALUE

    Total Project Life Cycle

    R. M. Wideman, 1992

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    27/47

    Life Cycle Risk Analysis

    Typical Life Cycle Risks

    Phase 1

    Conceptualization

    Phase 2

    Development

    Phase 3

    Implementation

    Phase 4

    Termination

    Unavailable Experts

    Poor Definition ofProblem

    No or Poor Feasibility

    Study

    Unclear Objectives

    Lukewarm Support fromSponsor

    Unproven Technology

    Poor Market Intelligence

    No Risk ManagementPlan

    Hasty and PoorPlanning

    Poor Specifications

    Unclear WBS & SOW

    Unclear Definition ofRoles andResponsibilities

    LukewarmManagement Support

    Inexperienced PM andProject Team

    Unskilled Labour

    Unreliable Suppliers

    Quality and Availabilityof Materials

    Changes in Scope

    Changes in Costs andSchedules

    Labour Strikes

    Weather Conditions

    Changes in RegulatoryRequirements

    Environmental or OHSCompliance

    Inadequate MonitoringControl Systems

    Poor Performanceand Quality ofProduct or Service

    Changes in

    CustomersExpectations

    Cash FlowProblems

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    28/47

    Effective Risk Management

    Open Communication

    Enabling formal, informal andimpromptu communication and flowof information.

    Using processes that value theindividual voice and insight intoidentifying and managing projectrisks

    Integrated Management Making risk management an integral

    and vital part of project management

    Adapting risk management tools andmethods to the project management

    infrastructure and culture

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    29/47

    The PMI Risk management

    Processes

    Plan Risk Management meetings to develop a risk management plan

    Identify Risks determining project risks and their characteristics

    Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis assessing relative impact and likelihood of identified risks

    Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis numeric analysis of probability and consequences

    Plan Risk Responses developing options to enhance opportunities, reduce threats

    Monitor and Control Risks tracking identified risks, executing risk plans and contingency plans

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    30/47

    The Risk Management Processes

    *Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK): Fourth Edition. The Project Management Institute PMI

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    31/47

    The Risk Management Processes

    *Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK): Fourth Edition. The Project Management Institute PMI

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    32/47

    The Risk Management Processes

    *Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK): Fourth Edition. The Project Management Institute PMI

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    33/47

    The Risk Management Processes

    *Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK): Fourth Edition. The Project Management Institute PMI

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    34/47

    The Risk Management Processes

    *Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK): Fourth Edition. The Project Management Institute PMI

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    35/47

    The Risk Management Processes

    *Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK): Fourth Edition. The Project Management Institute PMI

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    36/47

    Risk Conditions in PM Knowledge Areas

    KnowledgeArea Risk Conditions

    Integration Inadequate planning; poor resource allocation; poor integrationmanagement; lack of post-project review

    Scope Poor definition of scope or work packages; incomplete definition ofquality requirements; inadequate scope control

    Time Errors in estimating time or resource availability; poor allocation andmanagement of float; early release of competitive products

    Cost Estimating errors; inadequate productivity, cost, change, or contingencycontrol; poor maintenance, security, purchasing, etc.

    Quality Poor attitude toward quality; substandarddesign/materials/workmanship; inadequate quality assurance program

    HumanResources

    Poor conflict management; poor project organization and definition ofresponsibilities; absence of leadership

    Communications Carelessness in planning or communicating; lack of consultation withkey stakeholders

    Risk Ignoring risk; unclear assignment of risk; poor insurance management

    Procurement Unenforceable conditions or contract clauses; adversarial relations

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    37/47

    Attributes of the Effective Risk

    Management Process (RMP)

    Value Added: The RMP should be seen toprovide value to the project team but simple

    to use and implement, without undueadministrative burden.

    Structured and Generic: The processshould be a structured and generic but

    readily adaptable to sector-specific projects Scalable: RMP should be readily scalable to

    projects of different scope.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    38/47

    Elements of an Appropriate RMP

    Infrastructure Project Management Information System

    Risk Management Information System Performance Failure Information System Lessons Learned Information System Earned Value Information System

    Risk Analysis Software Tools Simulation Tools Decision Analysis Tools

    Risk Resources Policies and Procedures Standards and Templates Risk Experts Training for Project Team Networking with Relevant External Bodies

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    39/47

    Risk Strategies and Organizational

    Environment

    High LowRisk Tolerance

    Project

    RiskManagementPolicies&

    Procedures

    Guidelin

    es

    Rigid

    Acceptance

    Mitigation orEnhancement

    Transferring orSharing

    Avoidance orExploitation

    Project Management: A Systems Approach, Harold Kerzner, J Wiley & Sons

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    40/47

    Organizations Risk Culture

    Risk Averse: Organizations that have low riskthreshold

    Risk Taker: Organizations that have a high riskthreshold and track record of managing risky

    projects. Risk Ignorant/Hostile: Organizations that, because

    of the nature of their sector, have arrogant orignorant attitude towards risk.

    Risk Mature: Organizations that recognize and

    accept uncertainty as inevitable, and are prepared todevelop mature risk management processes tomanage the negative impact of threats and reap thebenefits of opportunities.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    41/47

    Risk Attitudes and Drivers of Behaviour

    Attitude Neutral

    Environment

    Behaviour

    Attitudesdrive

    behaviour ina neutral orpositiveenvironment

    Attitude Hostile

    Environment

    Behaviour

    Hostileenvironmentdrives

    behaviour

    Uncertainty Uncertainty

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    42/47

    Individuals Risk Attitudes

    Risk Averse (RA) Uncomfortable with uncertainty and has low tolerance for

    ambiguity

    Practical, accepting, has common sense approach to issues,

    and enjoys working with facts rather than theories. Threats are more readily perceived by the RA, while opportunities

    are underrated. RAs tend to over react to threats and under reactto opportunities

    Risk Tolerant (RT) Takes uncertainty in a stride as a normal feature of project work

    Has a laissez-faire approach that may lead to failure to assessthe potential impact of both threats and opportunities

    May appear to have a balanced attitude towards risk, but outlookcan have negative long term effects

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    43/47

    Individuals Risk Attitudes

    Risk Neutral (RN) Sees risk taking as a price worth paying for future payoffs They think abstractly and creatively and are not afraid of

    dealing with uncertainty

    RNs have mature attitudes towards threats andopportunities

    Risk Seeking (RS) Welcomes the challenge of dealing with risks, and the thrill

    of garnering potential payoffs. Risk seekers tend to be adaptable and resourceful, enjoy

    lifes challenges and are driven by the promise of payoffs RSs tend to under estimate the consequences of threats

    and over estimate the benefits of opportunities

    I di id l Ri k Attit d

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    44/47

    Individuals Risk Attitudes

    Attribute Risk Averse Risk Neutral Risk Tolerant Risk Seeking

    Attitudetowardsthreats

    Over sensitiveand aware

    Aware Unconcernedand cavalier

    Underestimatesimportance

    Actionstowardsthreats

    Aggressivelyavoids and/orminimizes theirconsequences

    Respondsproportionately

    Does notrespond

    Accepts orignores them

    Attitudetowards

    opportunity

    Under sensitiveand/or unaware

    Seek strategiesthat have highfuture payoff

    Unconcernedand cavalier

    Overestimatestheir importance

    Actionstowardsopportunity

    Under reactand/or ignore

    Respondsproportionately

    None Aggressivelyexploit and/orenhance

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    45/47

    Tolerance for Risk

    Risk Seeker

    Risk Neutral

    Value at stake

    Satisfaction

    Low High

    Low

    High

    Risk Averter

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    46/47

    Behaviour Modification of Risk

    Attitudes Risk attitudes are not hard wired in the human brain. All attitudes

    are chosen situational responses driven by subtle and complex set offactors, some of which are subconscious and deep rooted.

    Project team members through reflection and the use of various

    available psychometric self assessment instruments (EmotionalIntelligence Individual Diagnostic IQ) can raise their self awareness,which can lead to self-regulation, behaviour modification andmanagement.

    Behaviour modification involves understanding of which attitudes willproduce the desired effect in a given situation, and consciouslymodifying ones attitude as appropriate, even if it means adopting an

    approach that is counterintuitive Project team members can also be trained to look actively for

    opportunities rather than only for threats, and adopt a more positivethinking frame of mind that recognizes that opportunities exist, haveto be proactively identified and effectively managed.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Module 1 S2011

    47/47

    The Risk-Balanced Project Team Team Work is essential in the risk

    management process, where theattributes of each member contribute tothe overall capacity of the team

    The risk averse person can be reliedupon to challenge plans and strategieslooking for threats and testing thefeasibility of proposed solutions.

    The risk seeker colleague can look moreproactively for opportunities for doing

    work better, faster and cheaper. The risk neutral team member can test

    all strategies for their long term benefits tothe project and the organization.

    The risk tolerant can offer an overall