Reassignment committee meeting August 14, 2012
-
Upload
nash-rocky-mount-public-schools -
Category
Education
-
view
1.011 -
download
2
Transcript of Reassignment committee meeting August 14, 2012
Student Reassignment Committee
Meeting Tuesday, August 14, 2012
6:00 p.m.
Scenario Recommendations
District Reassignment Committee
Meeting
3
AGENDASTUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Media Center, Nash Central High SchoolTuesday, August 14, 2012 - 6:00 pm
Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward Sr.
Roll Call………..…………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant
Approval of Minutes from the June 25, 2012 and July 17, 2012 Meeting Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Recommendations …….………………………………Mike Miller, OREd Report to School Board 8/27/2012…Regular Committee update 9/24/2012…Full Committee presentation to the School Board Questions?
Next Meeting9/10/2012
Committee voice vote 6:00 pm
Communications
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
5
TIME-LINE
Jan-Aug 2012
Committee Deliberations/
Monthly Reports to the School
Board
Aug - 2012Committee
Recommendations Presented to
the School Board
Aug – Dec 2012
Public Input/ Community Engagement
Board of Education Approval
August 2013Implementatio
n
6
PROCESS IS EVERYTHING
Board of Education
Community Feedback Committee
Committee Chairs
Public Engagement
Technical Support
OREDStaff
7
Contiguous boundaries: Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite
attendance areas.
Respect neighborhoods: Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified
“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.
Proximity to schools: While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest
school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries.
School Board Priorities
8
Modify feeder systems: In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site,
consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.
Stay within enrollment capacities: Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high
schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.
Consider anticipated growth: Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that
anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.
Enrollment balance: In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and
economic populations at each middle and high school.
School Board Priorities
9
IPSAC – TimelineFebruary 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process
March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data
April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision
May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
June 25 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
July 17 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
August 14 – Scenario Recommendations
TransparentLines of CommunicationsCommittee Meetings
Open to the publicWebsite
Information posted immediately after each meetingE-mail/ Phone Line
An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.
A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.
COMMUNICATIONS
11
Mike Miller, OREd
Scenario Recommendations
Committee Requests (deadline: 8/8/12)MS 04, Rev. 2HS 02, Rev. 2/MS 04, Rev. 3/ES 02, Rev. 1
IPSAC – Status
12
All requests submitted/processed according to scenario review rules (Scenario Tools – June 27, 2012)
Requests may be applicable to specific scenarios
Requests will be considered individually after general scenario recommendations
13
Committee Requests
Committee Request – MS 04, Rev. 2
14
Request processed by OREdJuly 11, 2012
Committee Request – HS 02, Rev. 2MS 04, Rev. 3ES 02, Rev. 1
15
Request processed by OREdJuly 19, 2012
16
Scenario Overview
Addresses utilization concerns
Impacts large number of children
Impacts balance metrics
Does not improve feeder pattern
17
Proximity + Utilization
ES 01, Rev. 1
MS 01, Rev. 1
HS 01, Rev. 1
Considers reassignment impact
Considers balance metrics
Considers feeder patterns
Considers utilization
18
Impact + Metrics
ES 02
MS 03, Rev. 1MS 04, Rev. 1MS 05, Rev. 1
HS 02, Rev. 1
19
Impact + Metrics
HS 02, Rev. 1 *
MS 04, Rev. 1 *
MS 03, Rev. 1 *
ES 02 * * Recommendation will consider Committee requests as applicable.
20
Impact + Metrics
HS 02, Rev. 1 *
MS 05, Rev. 1 *
MS 03, Rev. 1 *(OR)
MS 04, Rev. 1 *
ES 02 * * Recommendation will consider Committee requests as applicable.
MS 04, Rev. 2 ?HS 02, Rev. 2/MS 04, Rev. 3/ES 02, Rev. 1
?
21
Consider Committee Requests
February 13 (4:00)
March 26 (6:00)
April 30 (6:00)
May 29 (6:00)
June 12 (6:00)
June 25 (4:00)
July 17 (6:00)
August 14 (6:00)
Monday, Sept. 10 (6:00)
MEETING SCHEDULE
QUESTIONS