Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference ... · Action . Program Office/Industry...
Transcript of Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference ... · Action . Program Office/Industry...
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
March 2011
Defense Cost & Resource Center (DCARC)
Executive Overview Brief
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Agenda
• Introduction
• Mission & Function
• Organizational Structure
• Infrastructure
• Key Products and Services
• Efficiency Innovations
• Summary
2
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Introduction
• Defense Cost & Resource Center (DCARC) Office was established by OSD in 1998 to centrally manage the Contractor Cost Data Report (CCDR) requirement for the entire DOD acquisition community
• CCDRs have evolved to include Software Resource Data Report (SRDR) and the program is today known as the Cost and Software Data Report (CSDR) system
• The DCARC Office provides a centralized management structure for the CSDR requirement, and the collection and distribution of these data
• The DCARC Office also is DOD’s agent for the collection, storage and distribution of Earned Value Management (EVM) reports
• Our primary mission goal is to provide both secure, on-line, access to CSDR and EV reports to DOD cost analysts
• This briefing will highlight our key infrastructure, mission and function, business process, IT tools and efficiency innovations we utilize to meet our primary mission goal
3
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Mission and Function • Mission:
– Provide an accurate record of historical program cost data, within a searchable and easy to use system, for the government cost analyst to create realistic budgets and credible cost estimates
• Goals: – Primary: Cost collection, planning, and execution of the
CSDR process
– Secondary: Cost collection and administration of the EV Central Repository
4
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Organization Structure
Deputy Director of Cost Assessment
DCARC Director
CSDR Operations Support Staff
CSDR Requirement Development & Implementation Support
CSDR Validations
Communications
Outreach & Training
Government Staff IT Product Development & Support Staff
DCARC Helpdesk
Server Maintenance
Software & Web Development
5
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Infrastructure
6
The DCARC staff and IT infrastructure ensure the collection, storage and distribution of CSDR and EV reports for the DOD
Organization Number of CSDR Users by Organization
ARMY 223 AF 310 NAVY 353 OSD 61 DCMA/DCAA 112 Weapons CTR 788 TOTAL 1847
Organization Number of EVM-CR Users by Organization
ARMY 277 AF 451 NAVY 449 OSD 85 DCMA/DCAA 210 Weapons CTR 639 TOTAL 2111
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Key Products and Services
• Products – Deliver CSDR & EV Data to the DOD cost community in secure, on-line systems
• Contractor Cost Data Reports (CCDRs) • Software Resource Data Reports (SRDRs) • Contract Performance Report (CPR)
– Develop and manage CSDR policy & contractual implementation instruments • DoDM 5000.04-M-1 Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Manual • Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) • Contracts Data Requirement List (CDRLs) • DFARS CSDR Clauses • Policy/Product Innovations
– New 1921-4 Contractor Sustainment Report
– Develop and deliver IT tools • CSDR Planning & Execution Tool (cPet)
– CSDR Plan Development (WBS, Contractual deliverable cost reports) – CCDR Report Validation Tool
• DCARC Knowledge Portal – DACIMS CSDR Data Repository – Earned Value Central Repository – Submit-Review Website – Secure CSDR data submission portal – Innovations to transform DACIMS Repository into Relational Database – Innovations to develop new “Views” of CSDR Data
7 OSD CAPE owns CSDR policy- PARCA owns Earned Value Policy
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Key Products and Services
• Services – Leadership
• OSD CAPE CSDR Steering Committee • CSDR Focus Group • CAPE Cost Assessment Monthly Service Cost Center Chiefs Meeting • CSDR monthly compliance metrics within Defense Acquisition Executive
Summary (DAES)
– Technical Support • Support every MDAP & MAIS Government Program Office • Validate every CSDR Submission and upload into DACIMS • Support every US & Foreign supplier of CSDR data • Manage the CSDR IPT Process
– Training and Outreach • CSDR Training Classes to Government/Industry • DODCAS & SCEA • Support every CSDR Post Contract Award Meeting
8
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CSDR Reporting System
CWBS Dictionary
Cost Data Summary
Report
Functional Cost Hour
Report
Progress Curve Report
Contractor Business
Data Report
Software Resource
Data Reports
Key Products and Services
9
DD Form 1921
DD Form 1921-1
DD Form 1921-2
DD Form 1921-3
Final Software Developer Report
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Efficiency Innovations
10
Goal Efficiency Innovations Performance Metric
1 Reduce cost of report preparation for industry
• Cpet “flat file” tool used by industry to prepare and validate CCDR reports
# hours required to develop, validate and submit CSDR reports
2 Improve compliance
• Developed, fielded and trained government users on new cPet tool for CSDR Plan development
• MIL-STD-881C WBS based • Produces all key CSDR documents • Improves consistency and utility of all return CSDR data
# hours to develop/approved CSDR Plans
3 Improve Data Quality
• New CSDR IPT business rules • Greater emphasis on Program Office involvement in report validations
# of report acceptances
4 Improve security • Developed and testing new Submit-Review Portal that will replace Erooms
# of security issues
5 Expand application of the CSDR requirement
• New DD Form , DID and CDRL for the 1921-4 Contractor Sustainment Report
# of CSDR Plans and 1921-4 reports for CLS contracts
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Summary
• DCARC Office established in 1998 to provide centralized management of the CCDR requirement and facilitate the storage and distribution of CCDR data to DOD cost analysts
• Today, we collect, store and distribute CSDR reports on every MDAP ACAT 1 and MAIS Program
• Today, we collect, store and distribute all DOD MDAP Earned Value reports
• Today, we offer on-time, direct support to every MDAP and MAIS Government Program Office
• Today, we offer on-time, direct support to US and foreign suppliers of CSDR data
• Today, we continue to listen to our customers to evolve our products and services to the changing needs of the DOD cost community
• Today, the DCARC Office ensures “Data Driven” cost estimates are supported by credible, validated and comprehensive evidence.
11
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
BACKUP
12
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CSDR Data Collection Process
DDCA Approves
Plans ICE
Review
DAB Program Review/
Milestone Approval
PM Issues Solicitation to
Industry
Develop Draft CSDR Plans
Contract Award Industry Submits CSDRs
DCARC Validates CSDRs
Source Selection
13
Final Report
Submitted
6-12 months 6 months
Contract Closeout
24 months
CAPE/DCARC Action
Program Office/Industry
Action
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Setting the stage
• DoD Decision Makers want: – Accurate, timely and authoritative evidence that drives “data driven
resource decisions”
• CSDR Data providers must: – Be consistent in definitions, mapping and WBS structures across
contracts and programs – Provide data of the highest quality, integrity and utility – Adhere to all CSDR policies, procedures, manuals, Data Item
Descriptions, and DCARC business processes
• CSDR Data users must: – Know what data is available and how to obtain it – Apply the data sensibly to your program’s estimating needs – Document methodologies rigorously – Articulate the “evidentiary chain” from actual raw data to estimate
14
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Fundamentals of Cost and Software Data Reports
(CSDR)
15
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Cost Analysis Data Sources
1. Return resource data (i.e., actuals) – Internal contractor accounting records – Deliverable contractor cost reports Cost Performance Report (CPR) Cost/Schedule Status Report Cost & Software Data Reports (CSDRs)
Labor Hours, direct cost, indirect costs, functional cost, G&A, fee
2. Contract line item data (i.e., CLIN or Schedule B prices)
3. Historical obligation data (i.e., historical budgets) 4. Proposal data (i.e., bids, vendor quotes, etc.)
CSDR data is the best data for estimating DoD programs
16
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CSDR = CCDR + SRDR
• Contractor Cost Data Reports (CCDR) Provide standardized cost and hours information across programs Provide recurring/non-recurring split by Work Breakdown Structure
element Provide plan-wide direct and indirect resource data per contractor
facility Provide CWBS Dictionary Will soon provide contractor logistics support cost data
• Software Resources Data Reports (SRDR) Provide software information across programs Provide size, effort, schedule, and other descriptive development
data
What is a CSDR
17
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CCDR
Please see DCARC website for detail descriptions of these forms; http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/default.aspx
DD Form 1921
Displays all WBS elements
Nonrecurring and Recurring costs for all WBS elements
Contract Totals
G&A, Undistributed Budget, Management Reserve,
Facilities Capital Cost of Money, and Profit/Fee
Units for all hardware elements
DD Form 1921-1
Select WBS elements reported
Nonrecurring and Recurring cost breakout
Detailed breakout of all resource data: Labor, material,
and overhead dollars; labor hours
Reporting by all functions: Engineering, Tooling, Quality Control, and Manufacturing
DD Form 1921-2
Select WBS elements reported by Unit or Lot
Direct Recurring Costs to Date
Detailed breakout of direct costs
Reporting by all functions: Engineering, Tooling, Quality Control, and Manufacturing
18
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CCDR
• Provides for one Report per contractor site
• Covers all DoD business
• Direct Costs by Program
• Indirect Cost Categories
• Facility-wide specifics
• Direct labor rates (Functional Categories)
• Total FPR Unit Revenue (Sales)
• Organization Changes
• Accounting Changes
• Remarks
DD 1921-3 Contractor Business Data Report
Please see DCARC website for a detail description of this form; http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/default.aspx
19
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CCDR-continued
• A report for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) contracted efforts
• Recurring-Nonrecurring-Total, To-Date & At-Complete
• Unit Operations
• Unit Level Manpower
• Maintenance
• Sustainment Support
• Continuing System Improvements
• Installation and Personnel Support
• Summary
DD 1921-4 (Contractor Logistics &
Support (CLS) Detail Report
20
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
SRDR
1. SRDR formalizes contractor reporting of software development/upgrade metric data and consists of: – Data Reports – Data Dictionary
2. SRDR records both the expectations and actual
results of new software developments or upgrades
21
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
The benefits of CSDR Data 1.Return cost data (i.e. actuals)
– Data from completed development and production contracts for ACAT 1 Programs
2.Data fields that facilitate rigorous cost analysis
– Learning curves using labor hours and recurring costs at various levels of the WBS
– Investigations of direct cost and indirect cost behavior – Contract fee rates – Visibility in major subcontracted items
3.Comparability – The CSDR process is designed to maximize
consistency of data across companies, services, weapon systems types and programs
22
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CSDRs vs other return cost data
1. CSDRs vs CPRs – CPRs typically (& understandably) report costs according to either a process or
organizational structure that is program/contract specific Facilitates program/contract management Does not facilitate cross-program/contract cost analysis OSD AT&L Policy Memorandum states that the CPR, CSDR and IMS should
share a “common WBS” but this is not happening DoD wide – CPRs generally do not identify nonrecurring vs. recurring costs – Widely understood that a common WBS between CPR and CSDR reports is
desirable
2. CSDRs vs. internal contractor accounting records – Internal accounting records typically report costs according to a structure that
does not facilitate cross-program/contract cost analysis – Accounting data is more detailed than CSDRs but takes considerable
time/effort to map and normalize prior to use
Cost data that is organized according to a standard, end-item product oriented WBS is highly desirable
23
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Applications of CSDR Data
24
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
1. PROGRAM 2. PRIME MISSION PRODUCTa. MDAP: Cruize Missile H X PRIME / ASSOCIATEb. PHASE: EMD DIRECT-REPORTING SUBCONTRACTOR5. APPROVED PLAN NUMBER 6. CUSTOMER (Direct-Reporting Subcontractor U
a. CONTRACT NO.: N12345-98-C-234b. LATEST MODIFICATION:
8. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 12. REPORT AS OF (YYYYMMDD)INITIAL
a. START DATE (YYYYMMDD) : b. END DATE (YYYYMMDD) : INTERIMX FINAL
13. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial) 14. DEPARTMENT 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include Area Code) 16. EMAIL ADDRESS 17. DATE PREPARED (YYYYMMDD)
18. WBS ELEMENT CODE 19. WBS REPORTING ELEMENTX
a. TO DATE: 8.0 b. AT COMPLETION:
ENGINEERING
(1) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR HOURS 1.2 7.1 (2) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR DOLLARS $150.4 357.5 (3) ENGINEERING OVERHEAD DOLLARS $199.0 468.2 (4) TOTAL ENGINEERING DOLLARS $349.4 825.7MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
(5) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR HOURS XXXX XXXX (6) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (7) DIRECT TOOLING & EQUIPMENT DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (8) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR HOURS XXXX XXXX (9) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (10) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR HOURS XXXX XXXX (11) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (12) MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS OVERHEAD DOLLARS (Including To XXXX XXXX (13) TOTAL MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS DOLLARS (Sum of rows 6, 7 XXXX XXXXMATERIALS
(14) RAW MATERIAL DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (15) PURCHASED PARTS DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (16) PURCHASED EQUIPMENT DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (17) MATERIAL HANDLING/OVERHEAD DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (18) TOTAL DIRECT-REPORTING SUBCONTRACTOR DOLLARS XXXX XXXX (19) TOTAL MATERIAL DOLLARS XXXX XXXXOTHER COSTS (20) OTHER COSTS NOT SHOWN ELSEWHERE (Specify in Remarks) XXXX XXXXSUMMARY (21) TOTAL COST (Direct and Overhead) XXXX XXXX
DD FORM 1921-1, 20070416 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE. SECURITY CLASSIFICAT
$207.1$269.2$476.3
5.9$207.1$269.2
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 16 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
Unclassified
COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED AT COMPLETIONFUNCTIONAL DATA ELEMENTS
A. NONRECURRING B. RECURRING C. TOTAL D. NONRECURRING E. RECURRING F.TOTAL
c. SOLICITATION NO.:d. NAME:
O&M
21. APPROPRIATIONRDT&EPROCUREMENT
11. RESUBMISSION NUMBER
XXXX
FUNCTIONAL COST-HOUR REPORT
4. NAME/ADDRESS (Include Zip Code)
7. TYPE ACTION
10. SUBMISSION NUMBER
4 20001231
XXXX
357.5
825.7
XXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
7.1
468.2
XXXX
$476.3
1.2$150.4$199.0
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX22. REMARKS
XXXXXXXX
Unclassified
XXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
20010201
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
1.1.4.7
COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED TO DATE
Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)
5.9
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXX
$349.4
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX
3. CONTRACTOR TYPE (X One)
N-09-C-C1 Navy
8.0
20. NUMBER OF UNITS
9. REPORT CYCLE
Missile
• Analysis conducted to reveal correlation between NR Engineering Hours and physical, performance, programmatic characteristics.
Hours data taken from Program H and pooled with several other programs to build a normalized, standardized dataset
NR Engr Hrs = α × (Biasβ1) × (Volβ2) × (Schedβ3)
• Develop estimating relationship used to project NR Engineering hours for a DIFFERENT IMU.
NonrecurringEngineering
Hours Bias Volume Schedule
Program A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Inertial Measurement Unit
5,900
Estimating Hardware Engineering Design Cost Parametric Approach example (p.1 of 3)
18. WBS ELEMENT CODE 19. WBS REPORTING ELEMENTX
a. TO DATE: 8.0 b. AT COMPLETION:
ENGINEERING
(1) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR HOURS 1.2 7.1 (2) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR DOLLARS $150.4 357.5 (3) ENGINEERING OVERHEAD DOLLARS $199.0 468.2 (4) TOTAL ENGINEERING DOLLARS $349.4 825.7
$207.1$269.2$476.3
5.9$207.1$269.2
COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED AT COMPLETIONFUNCTIONAL DATA ELEMENTS
A. NONRECURRING B. RECURRING C. TOTAL D. NONRECURRING E. RECURRING F.TOTAL
O&M
21. APPROPRIATIONRDT&EPROCUREMENT
357.5
825.7
7.1
468.2$476.3
1.2$150.4$199.0
1.1.4.7
COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED TO DATE
Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)
5.9
$349.4
8.0
20. NUMBER OF UNITS
25
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
IMU Design Engineering Hours
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
- 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000
Observed
Pred
icte
d A
E
G
B
FH
C
D
Engineering Hours = 46.5 * (Bias)-0.47 * (Volume)0.43 * (Schedule)1.12
NonrecurringEngineering
HoursBias
(degrees)Volume(cu. cm.)
Schedule(months)
Program A 24,200 1 30 54
B 11,000 2 40 40
C 5,500 2.5 20 32
D 3,500 10 30 34
E 13,750 1 28 48
F 6,200 2 30 24
G 11,350 1 30 40
H 5,900 5 25 36
Inertial Measurement Unit
Data pulled from programmatic and schedule documents
Data pulled from technical documents
Data pulled from CCDR DD Form 1921-1Functional Cost-Hour Report
Estimating Hardware Engineering Design Cost Parametric Approach example (p. 2 of 3)
26
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Estimating Hardware Engineering Design Cost Parametric Approach example (p.3 of 3)
Engineering Hours = 46.5 * (Bias)-0.47 * (Volume)0.43 * (Schedule)1.12
NonrecurringEngineeringHours
Bias (degrees)
Volume(cu. Cm.)
Schedule(months)
Generic Supersonic Cruise Missile 11,356.7 1 24 40ESTIMATE
11,356.7 Hrs40.00$ Engineering Labor Rate
454,268.0$ Direct Engineering Labor Dollars
115% Engineering Overhead Rate522,408.2$ Engineering Overhead Dollars
120,000.00$ Material Dollars
46,787.0$ ODC Dollars
1,143,464.4$ Total Engineering Dollars
INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNIT
27
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION Unclassified
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
a. MDAP:
b. PHASE:
6. CUSTOMER (Direct-Reporting Subcontractor Use Only)a. CONTRACT NO.:b. LATEST MODIFICATION:
12. REPORT AS OF (YYYYMMDD)a. START DATE (YYYYMMDD): INITIALb. END DATE (YYYYMMDD): INTERIM
FINAL15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include Area Code) 17. DATE PREPARED (YYYYMMDD)
18. WBS ELEMENT CODEX
X
A4
31.040.00.0
(5a) (5b) (5c)
5.0 26.0$175.0 910.0
0.7 3.6$12.6 64.8$4.0 18.00.8 4.0
$17.6 88.06.8 33.7
$102.0 505.5$136.2 676.3
DD FORM 1921-2, 20070416 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE.
$0.0
Unclassified
16. E-MAIL ADDRESS
20. UNITS/LOTS COMPLETED
C. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS AND HOURS INCURRED TO DATE
A3
7.0$245.0
11.020.0
B. WORK IN PROCESS (WIP)
$111.0$170.5
5. APPROVED PLAN NUMBER
AIRFRAME
13. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial) 14. DEPARTMENT
LOT TOTAL PROCUREMENT
10. SUBMISSION NUMBER8. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 9. REPORT CYCLE
1. PROGRAM
7. TYPE ACTION
PRIME / ASSOCIATE
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 16 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION.
21. APPROPRIATIONRDT&E
(1) MODEL AND SERIES (2) FIRST UNIT 1.0
A2
0.0
21.0
O&M
A. COMPLETED UNITS/LOTS
PROGRESS CURVE REPORT
8.3
1.0$18.0$6.01.0
0.8
$22.0
UNIT TOTAL
0.0$0.0
$0.0
$19.8
$148.2
22. REMARKS
(3) LAST UNIT0.0
d. NAME:
0.0
$0.00.0
$0.0$0.0$0.0
SpeedPower
(6) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR HOURS (7) DIRECT ENGINEERING LABOR DOLLARSMANUFACTURING OPERATIONS (RECURRING ONLY)
6.0$210.0$280.0
10.0
8.0
(4) CONCURRENT UNITS 0.0
ENGINEERING (RECURRING ONLY)
CHARACTERISTICS
Weight
30.0
(15) TOTAL DIRECT MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS DOLLARS (Sum of rows 9,10,12, and (14) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR DOLLARS
$14.4
$168.0
(8) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR HOURS (9) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR DOLLARS (10) DIRECT TOOLING & EQUIPMENT DOLLARS
(19) TOTAL DIRECT-REPORTING SUBCONTRACTOR DOLLARS
(13) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR HOURS
$3.00.9
$19.87.4
$5.0
$124.5
(11) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR HOURS
OTHER COSTS (RECURRING ONLY) (21) OTHER DIRECT COSTS NOT SHOWN ELSEWHERE (Specify in Remarks)
MATERIALS (RECURRING ONLY)
(16) RAW MATERIALS DOLLARS (17) PURCHASED PARTS DOLLARS (18) PURCHASED EQUIPMENT DOLLARS
(20) TOTAL DIRECT MATERIAL DOLLARS
(12) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR DOLLARS1.3
$28.611.2
$221.4
2. PRIME MISSION PRODUCT 3. CONTRACTOR TYPE
DIRECT-REPORTING SUBCONTRACTOR
4. NAME/ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code)
11. RESUBMISSION NUMBER
b. SOLICITATION NO.:
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
(22) TOTAL DIRECT COSTSUMMARY (RECURRING ONLY)
1.1
DATA ELEMENTS
1.1.3
19. WBS REPORTING ELEMENT
A1
Estimating Manufacturing Hours
example (p.1 of 3)
Quantity data
Hours and Dollars data
Progress Curve Report
A4
31.040.00.035.3
DATA ELEMENTS
A1
10.0 (4) CONCURRENT UNITS 0.0 (3) LAST UNIT
0.0
A. COMPLETED UNITS/LOTS
0.0
21.030.0
(1) MODEL AND SERIES (2) FIRST UNIT 1.0
A2
11.020.0
A3
Calculated Lot Midpoint 4.2 15.2 25.3
0.7$12.6$4.00.8
$17.6$6.8
$102.0$136.2
$111.0$170.5
$8.3
1.0$18.0$6.01.0
0.8
$22.0
$19.8
$148.2
MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS (RECURRING ONLY)
(15) TOTAL DIRECT MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS DOLLARS (Sum of rows 9,10,12, and (14) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR DOLLARS
$14.4
$168.0
(8) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR HOURS (9) DIRECT TOOLING LABOR DOLLARS (10) DIRECT TOOLING & EQUIPMENT DOLLARS
(13) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR HOURS
$3.00.9
$19.8$7.4
$5.0
$124.5
(11) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR HOURS (12) DIRECT QUALITY CONTROL LABOR DOLLARS
1.3$28.6$11.2
$221.4
1.1
28
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Estimating Manufacturing Hours example (p. 2 of 3)
A4
31.040.00.035.3
6.8
Calculated Lot Average Unit Hours 0.68
DATA ELEMENTS
A1
11.2 (13) DIRECT MANUFACTURING LABOR HOURS 7.4
10.0 (4) CONCURRENT UNITS 0.0 (3) LAST UNIT
0.0
A. COMPLETED UNITS/LOTS
8.3
0.0
21.030.0
(1) MODEL AND SERIES (2) FIRST UNIT 1.0
A2
11.020.0
A3
1.12 0.83 0.74
Calculated Lot Midpoint 4.2 15.2 25.3
Lot Avg Unit Hrs Lot Midpoint1.12 4.20.83 15.20.74 25.30.68 35.3
• Analysis conducted to reveal relationship between lot midpoint quantity and lot average unit direct manufacturing hours • Data plotted and regressed to calculate first unit (T1) hours and progress curve slope
Lot Avg Unit Mfg Hrs = T1 (midpoint)
b
Quantity data taken from LRIP I are used to calculate Lot Midpoints. Hours data used to calculate lot average unit hours.
Quantity data
Hours data
29
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Estimating Manufacturing Hours example (p. 3 of 3)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Lot Midpoint
Ave
rage
Uni
t Man
ufac
turin
g H
ours
(Tho
usan
ds)
1.12
0.83
0.740.68
Lot I Lot II
0.58
Using the LRIP I Progress Curve data, the analyst can estimate Lot Average Unit Direct Manufacturing Hours for the LRIP II option of 60 airframes (units #41-100 ) as 0.58 hours (thousands). The analyst may also want to model rate effects.
LRIP II (option)Quantity 10 10 10 10 60Unit # 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-100Lot Midpoint 4.2 15.2 25.3 35.3 67.8Lot Avg Unit Hrs 1.12 0.83 0.74 0.68 0.58
LRIP I
Lot Average Unit Manufacturing Hours (thousands) = 1.57 (Lot Midpoint) -0.23
30
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DCARC Systems Overview
31
DCARC Portal Provides Single Login Access To CSDR and EVM Systems
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CSDR Systems Overview
• Key DCARC IT Systems Supporting CSDR Functions – cPET (Web): Preparing CSDR Plans, RDT, Validations – cPET (Desktop): Preparing CSDR submissions, pre-validation – CSDR-SR: Manages CSDR Submission and Review Business
Functions – DACIMS: CSDR Repository Supporting Cost Estimating
Functions
32 Core CSDR IT Systems
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Access to CSDR data • Defense Automated Cost Information Management System (DACIMS)
is the DCARC’s repository of CSDR type data • CSDR data is proprietary, therefore access is controlled • Government Employees
– On-line access to the DACIMS repository requires registration through the DCARC website
– A DACIMS account allows users to access CSDR data only
• Support contractors – Must demonstrate a Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDA) with industry – An NDA will not grant you on-line access – Access to CSDR reports must be through your registered government
customer, or by ad-hoc data pulls by the DCARC staff • FFRDC’s – Similar to Support Contractors • Outside Agencies- Not currently permitted access
33
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Final Thoughts
• Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) = CCDRs + SRDRs
• CCDRs are the ‘best’ standardized source of return cost (& labor hour) data – Organized according to standard, product oriented WBS (i.e., MIL-
HDBK-881) – Provide useful visibility into resources (cost and hours)
• SRDRs are the ‘best’ standardized source of software metrics
• CSDRs are required for all – Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAP), i.e., ACAT I programs – Major Automated Information Systems (MAIS), i.e., ACAT IA programs
• The OSD CAPE Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC) Office manages the collection and dissemination of this data
• The Defense Automated Cost Information System (DACIMS), DCARC’s repository for CCDRs & SRDRs, houses contract data for all ACAT 1C/1D MDAPs since 1960
An essential part of every cost analyst’s toolbox
34
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
• Credible cost estimates enable realistic budgets, executable contracts & program stability – A win/win for DOD & industry
• DoD experience indicates that return cost data (i.e., actuals) for
completed development & production contracts facilitate credible cost estimates – Used in the proper context, actuals are far & away the best basis of
estimate
• CSDRs are DoD’s only systematic mechanism for capturing actuals that provide the right visibility and consistency needed to develop credible cost estimates
In Closing-Why CSDRs?
Cost analysts must be strong CSDR advocates
35
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Additional Resources
• Bi-annual CSDR Training sponsored by the DCARC
http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/Training/index.aspx • Complete on-line CSDR training class
http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/Training/tutorials.aspx • DCARC Website
http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil/ • Ad Hoc Inquires Mike Augustus, Director DCARC, (571) 372-4267 [email protected] Rob Currie, CSDR Lead Instructor, (571) 372-4262
36
Presented at the 2012 SCEA/ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com