Pilot Monitoring vs Pilot Managing - PACDEFF · 2017. 8. 13. · The results have been so...

22
Pilot Monitoring vs Pilot Managing Lex Rock Heemstra SM Human Factors Qatar Flight Operations Training PACDEFF, Melbourne, Australia, 2017

Transcript of Pilot Monitoring vs Pilot Managing - PACDEFF · 2017. 8. 13. · The results have been so...

  • Pilot Monitoring vs Pilot Managing

    Lex Rock Heemstra – SM Human FactorsQatar Flight Operations Training

    PACDEFF, Melbourne, Australia, 2017

  • Captain Historically

  • Problem Statement

    “The modern airplane is the product of a program of research, development and refinement in detail that no other structure or mechanism has ever matched. The results have been so remarkable that there is always danger of forgetting that these extraordinary craft still have to be operated by men, and that the most important test they have to meet is still that of being operable without imposing unreasonable demands or

    unnecessary strains on the flight personnel.”

    Edward P. Warner , 1946

    President ICAO : 1947-1957

    “History repeats itself ….

    because nobody listens”

    John Lennon

  • Problems with Monitoring

    • “Throughout the flight, pilots are required to monitor many functions, the state of the aircraft, aircraft configuration, flight path and the actions of the other pilot in the cockpit. Thus, the number of opportunities for error is enormous – especially on challenging flights”.

    Foreword – A Practical Guide for Improving Flight Path Monitoring – FSF - 2014

    • Two major Safeguards – Checklists and Monitoring.

  • Industry Concern regarding Monitoring

    • 2010 – “Checklists and Monitoring in the Cockpit: Why Critical Defenses sometimes fail”. Dismukes, R.K. & Berman, B. NASA

    • 2013: RAeS Flight Operations Group – Aircraft Commander in the 21st Century: “Pilot Monitoring – Cultivating a Healthy Unease”

    • 2013: CAA Paper 2013/02: “Monitoring Matters - Guidance on the Development of Pilot Monitoring Skills”

    • 2014: Flight Safety Foundation: “A practical Guide for Improving Flight Path Monitoring”

    Flight Safety Foundation: Practical Guide to Flight Path Monitoring - November 2014

  • Challenges in Monitoring

    • Human Factors:

    – The human brain has difficulty with sustained vigilance

    – The human brain has quite limited ability to multitask

    – Humans are vulnerable to interruptions and distractions

    – Humans are vulnerable to cognitive limitations that affect what they notice and do not notice.

    Flight Safety Foundation: Practical Guide to Flight Path Monitoring - November 2014

  • Less Pilot Monitoring Duties ???

    FADEC

    RAAS

    FOQA

    FIRE/SMOKE DETECTION

    HEADINGTCAS

    SPEED

    SMART LANDING

    FMGC

    HEIGHT

    ENGINE START

    EICAS/ECAM

    FUEL MANAGEMENT

    CABIN PRESSURISATION

    EGPWS

    Auto Pilot

    Auto Throttle

    Flight Director

  • Airline Accidents and Trend

    Source: Flight Safety Foundation

    B767

    B757

    B737-300

    A320

    A340

    B737-400

    B737-500

    B777-200

    B777-300

    A340-600

    A380

    Red)

  • On Approach

    The general PM phase of

    flight responsibilities are:

    – Checklist reading

    – Communications

    – Tasks asked for by the

    PF

    – Monitoring taxiing,

    flight path, airspeed,

    airplane configuration,

    and navigation.

    Read the

    checklist

    “Missed

    approach

    altitude set”

    Monitor

    Flight path

    “Cabin

    crew calls”

    “GS”

    “Managed

    speed”

    Pilot Monitoring (PM)Majority of Airlines

    Localiser

    alive

    “LOC”

    AP 1+2

    LOC blue

    GS Blue

    Call out

    “CHECK” - at

    least 9 times

    Landing

    Lights onFlap

    Settings

    Arm Speed

    Brakes

    Confirm

    Check

    Monitor

    Speed

    Landing

    Gear Down

    Landing

    Clearance

    Frequency

    Change

    “GS alive”

    “GS Star”

  • Effective Monitoring

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Never Hardly Ever Sometimes Often Very Often

    "I have observed the other pilot make errors due to a lack of knowledge /understanding of the automation"

    FO's Captains Instructors

    Source: Multicultural Airline Automation Questionnaire 2010; N= 306 (Heemstra:2010)

    FO’s

    Captains

    Instructors

  • BEA Trident AWO Project 1968/9

    • Under the auspices of John “Cats Eyes” Cunningham (Hawker Siddeley Test Pilot) and David “Guy” Thomas – developed an AWO procedure for the Trident

    – Left Seat – Senior Handling Pilot

    – Right Seat – Junior Handling Pilot

    – Jump Seat – Commander

    • 50 Simulator sessions with positive crews response

    • Not implemented – Unions and CAA anti (maybe ahead of it’s time).

    Source: Capt John Selwood – former BEA

  • Effective Monitoring

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    5 Yrs 10Yrs 15 Yrs 20 Yrs 25 Yrs 30 Yrs 35 Yrs 40 Yrs

    "I have observed the other pilot make errors due to lack of knowledge /understanding of the automation"

    Responses based on Years in Aviation

    Never Hardly Ever Sometimes Often Very Often

    Source: Multicultural Airline Automation Questionnaire 2010; N= 306 (Heemstra:2010)

    10,000 hours of "deliberate practice" are needed to become

    world-class in any field.Malcolm Gladwell

  • Gorilla Video Exercises

    • Before video – assign pairs – one PF and the other PM.

    • Video over:

    • PF – 14 X passes

    • PM – 14 X passes

    • The novelty of the situation draws in both PF and PM

    • Who then monitors the big picture?

    • Are we training monitoring correctly?.

  • Perception of Stress by Multinational Pilots

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    Age

    Perceived Stress by Age

    Perceived Stress 10 per. Mov. Avg. (Perceived Stress)

    Source: Multinational Airline Stress Questionnaire Jan/Feb 2011: N= 154, Captains = 81, FOs = 73

  • Perception of Stress by Multinational Pilots

    Perceived Stress by Hours (Experience)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    1800

    5500

    6500

    7000

    7500

    8000

    8500

    8500

    9000

    9500

    1000

    0

    1000

    0

    1000

    0

    1050

    0

    1070

    0

    1100

    0

    1100

    0

    1150

    0

    1200

    0

    1300

    0

    1300

    0

    1400

    0

    1400

    0

    1400

    0

    1500

    0

    1560

    0

    1670

    0

    1750

    0

    2000

    0

    2100

    0

    Flight Hours

    Perceived Stress 10 per. Mov. Avg. (Perceived Stress)

    Source: Multinational Airline Stress Questionnaire Jan/Feb 2011: N= 154, Captains = 81, FOs = 73

  • System 1 – Reactive Process (Intuition)

    • Unconscious, intuitive & effort free

    • Recognises patterns in a fraction of a second

    • Automatically produces an adequate solution to the challenges – “jumps to conclusions”

    • The Boss of our thoughts

    • Most of the time - very good at what is does

    • But:

    – Works in an oversimplified world,

    – Assumes “what you see is all there is”

    – Has no doubt whatsoever in its thinking process.

  • System II – Thinking Process

    • Slow, conscious and analytical

    • Takes time to analyse in depth

    • Required for Problem Solving and Decision Making

    • Represents the conscious self that makes choices and decides what to do

    System 1: Fast, automatic, frequent, emotional, stereotypic, subconscious

    System 2: Slow, effortful, infrequent, logical, calculating, conscious

  • So what now?

    • Several monitoring functions automated

    • Most workgroups rearrange existing procedures or set up additional or re-emphasise existing = mental overload

    • Pilots: effective monitors at approx 10 000 hrs plus

    • Novel distractions will capture attention of both pilots – suspicion/awareness

    • Mental workload/stress subject to individual ability

    • Cannot apply system I and system II thinking at the same time.

  • Abnormal/Emergency Events

    • Memory Item – conduct as trained.

    • All other:

    – FO – Pilot Flying: • max automation as available

    • Intuitive (System I) – mainly procedural memory

    – Capt – Pilot Managing: (use of knowledge & experience)• Slide seat back – enhances big picture

    • Engage System II

    • Problem Solving & Decision Making

    – Once new plan assessed and briefed – conduct landing as per company procedure

  • Consideration

    • Pilot Flying: – Physically flies the aircraft as instructed by the PM

    – Responsible for correct & intended flight path

    • Pilot Managing:

    – Manages the flight path and operation of the aircraft

    – Responsible for the safe and efficient operation of the aircraft

    – When managing – it is his/her sector

    – Takes ownership of the responsibility.

  • Back to the Future Captain?

  • Questions

    ?