PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~...

20
PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16-26, Yeosu, Korea

Transcript of PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~...

Page 1: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16-26, Yeosu, Korea

Page 2: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

1. Introduction

2. Methods

3. Results and discussion

4. Conclusions and prospects

Page 3: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24
Page 4: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

From Jack Cook, WHOI

Page 5: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

Additional stressor to marine ecosystem? What if another Fukushima accident happens??

Page 6: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

From UNSCEAR (2008)

Most sensitive aquatic organism

From UNSCEAR (2008)

LD50 for acute irradiation: 10-25 Gy

From Garnier-Laplace (2006))

Few data for tropical ecosystem! No data from China!!

Page 7: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

To examine the effect of acute gamma radiation on the survival and biochemical indicators of a typical fish species in the coastal environment of China

To provide essential information for radiological risk assessment and relevant stakeholders, including policymakers, nuclear regulators, environmental agencies, nuclear power plant, fisheries departments, marine aquaculture organizations and companies.

Page 8: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

An intertidal species

› More presumable pollution

from both land and water

A facultative air-breathing

fish

› perfect for irradiation study

High economic value

Page 9: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24
Page 10: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24
Page 11: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

5 irradiated groups + 1 control group

~ 60 individuals in each group

Co-60 point source

Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 Gy (determined by Alanine dosimeter (Aerial, France), respectively

Dose rate: 1.5 Gy/min

2 m

60Co

Page 12: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

25 ~ 26 °C Sterilized local

seawater Fed with shrimp

twice a week

Page 13: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24
Page 14: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Cum

ulat

ive

Perc

enta

ge o

f Mor

talit

y

Time in days after irradiation

48 Gy24 Gy12 Gy6 Gy3 Gy0 Gy

42 %

17 %

11 %

Page 15: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

Karber’s Method:

› Where: xk – the log value of maximum dose › d – the log value of dose difference › pi – mortality in group i

95 % confidence Interval:

Page 16: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

LD50 = 7.1 Gy (6.3 ~ 7.9 Gy )

From UNSCEAR (2008)

Most sensitive aquatic organism

LD50 for acute irradiation: 10-25 Gy

Page 17: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24
Page 18: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

LD50, 30 for the acute irradiation on Chinese

black sleeper was estimated to be 7.1 Gy,

with a 95 % confidence interval of 6.3 Gy to

7.9 Gy, which is lower than the previous

value summarized by UNSCEAR. More

experiments are needed to confirm the

above result.

Page 19: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24

DNA deficiency tests

Chronic radiation experiment

Other local species

Page 20: PICES 2014 Annual Meeting, Oct 16- 26, Yeosu, Korea€¦ · 5 irradiated groups + 1 control group ~ 60 individuals in each group Co-60 point source Single exposure of 3, 6, 12, 24