Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

download Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

of 6

Transcript of Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

  • 7/24/2019 Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

    1/6

    PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION OF THE LEAD-ACID BATTERY MODEL

    Nazih Moubayed

    1

    ,

    Janine Kouta

    1

    ,

    Ali EI-AIi

    2

    ,

    Hala Dernayka

    2

    and Rachid Outbib

    2

    1 Department

    of

    Electrical Engineering

    Faculty

    of

    Engineering 1 - Lebanese University - Lebanon

    2

    Laboratory

    of

    Sciences in Information and Systems (LSIS)

    Aix-Marseille III University, Marseille - France

    ABSTRACT

    The lead-acid battery, although known since strong a long

    time, are today even studied in an intensive way because

    of

    their economic interest bound to their use in the

    automotive and the renewable energies sectors.

    In

    this

    paper, the principle

    of

    the lead-acid battery is presented. A

    simple, fast, and effective equivalent circuit model

    structure for lead-acid batteries was implemented. The

    identification

    of

    the parameters

    of

    the proposed lead-acid

    battery model is treated. This battery model is validated by

    simulation using the Matlab/Simulink Software.

    INTRODUCTION

    Lead-acid batteries, invented in 1859 by French physicist

    Gaston Plante, are the oldest type of rechargeable battery.

    In 1880, Camille Faure finalizes a technique facilitating the

    manufacturing of the lead-acid battery. Since, the technical

    development didn't stop progressing (properties of the

    alloys, additives of the active matters, etc.)

    [1).

    Despite having the second lowest energy-to-weight ratio

    (next to the nickel-iron battery) and a correspondingly low

    energy-to-volume ratio, their ability to supply high surge

    currents means that the cells maintain a relatively large

    power-to-weight ratio.

    In

    addition, the lead-acid batteries

    are important thanks to the availability

    of

    the used

    materials and the possibility

    of

    their recycling

    [2).

    These

    features, along with their low cost, make them attractive

    for use in cars, as they can provide the high current

    required by automobile starter motors. They are also used

    in vehicles such as forklifts, in which the low energy-to

    weight ratio may

    in

    fact be considered a benefit since the

    battery can be used as a counterweight. Large arrays

    of

    lead-acid cells are used as standby power sources for

    telecommunications facilities, generating stations, and

    computer data centers. They are also used to power the

    electric motors in diesel-electric (conventional) submarines

    [3). The lead-acid battery is also used for storage energy

    which is delivered by a renewable energy system (solar

    energy system, and/or wind energy system .... ) [4).

    Today, more

    of

    the third

    of

    the world production

    of

    lead are

    used by the manufacture

    of

    batteries (60% to 65%

    of

    the

    market

    of

    the batteries concern the sale

    of

    lead-acid

    batteries).

    978-1-4244-1641-7/08/ 25.00

    2008 IEEE

    Modelling and simulation are important for electrical

    system capacity determination and optimum component

    selection. The battery model is a very important part

    of

    an

    electrical system simulation, and this model needs to be

    high-fidelity to achieve meaningful simulation results. This

    paper treats the case

    of

    the lead-acid battery. For it, an

    introduction to lead-acid battery is presented. The

    modelling

    of

    this battery is illustrated in two different

    models. The parameter identification

    of

    the studied model

    is also discussed. This identification is followed by a

    validation

    of

    the treated model by simulation using the

    Matlab/Simulink software. Finally, a conclusion about the

    obtained results are presented and discussed.

    THE LEAD-ACID BATTERY

    A lead-acid battery is an electrical storage device that

    uses a reversible chemical reaction to store energy. It

    uses a combination of lead plates or grids and an

    electrolyte consisting of a diluted sulphuric acid to convert

    electrical energy into potential chemical energy and back

    again

    [5).

    Each cell contains (in the charged state)

    electrodes of lead metal (Pb) and lead (IV) oxide (Pb02) in

    an electrolyte of about 37% wlw (5.99 Molar) sulfuric acid

    (H2S04).

    In

    the discharged state both electrodes tum into

    lead(lI) sulfate (PbS04) and the electrolyte loses its

    dissolved sulfuric acid and becomes primarily water. Due

    to the freezing-point depression

    of

    water, as the battery

    discharges and the concentration of sulfuric acid

    decreases, the electrolyte is more likely to freeze.

    Because

    of

    the open cells with liquid electrolyte in most

    lead-acid batteries, overcharging with excessive charging

    voltages will generate oxygen and hydrogen gas by

    electrolysis

    of

    water, forming an explosive mix. This should

    be avoided. Caution must also be observed because

    of

    the extremely corrosive nature

    of

    sulfuric acid.

    Lead-acid batteries have lead plates for the two

    electrodes. Separators are used between the positive and

    negative plates

    of

    a lead acid battery to prevent

    short-circuit through physical contact, mostly through

    dendrites ('treeing'), but also through shedding of the

    active material. Separators obstruct the flow

    of

    ions

    between the plates and increase the internal resistance

    of

    the cell (Fig.

    1).

    Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 04:54 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

  • 7/24/2019 Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

    2/6

    &&

    tL

    I

    .

    I-

    -

    ( I

    Reec\a ;lh

    Reacts

    IoI1th

    0

    sulfuric ootd

    sulfate ;ons

    .c

    .c

    'form 1 ...

    to form

    load

    e.

    e.

    s

    ulfato.

    Must

    sulfate. Pb

    s uppl y lootrons

    supplios

    Iw

    end

    1

    Ion

    H

    2

    SO

    4

    poslt1ve

    positive

    chergno

    end

    H

    2

    O

    1

    ...

    eloctrode

    -- -

    1. left

    ---

    IIOQ8tive

    Figure 1: Lead-acid battery [6].

    MODELING OF THE LEAD-ACID BATTERY

    The lead-acid battery represents a fundamental and main

    element in the renewable energy systems and in the

    hybrid vehicles. Therefore, it is necessary to study the

    modeling of this type of batteries.

    In

    fact, very big

    quantities of models exist, from the simplest, containing

    impedance placed in series with a voltage source, to the

    most complex. In general, these models represent the

    battery like an electric circuit composed of resistances,

    capacities and other elements, constant or variable

    (function of the temperature or the State Of Charge SOC

    that gives an idea on the quantity of active substance)

    [7],[8].

    The

    simplified

    model

    The simplest model of a lead-acid battery is composed of

    a voltage source placed

    in

    series with impedance (Fig. 2).

    ,...L

    r------

    Figure

    2:

    Lead-acid battery simplest model.

    The main problem of this model is that the two elements

    E(p) and Z(p) must be at least function of the State Of

    Charge (SOC) and of the battery's temperature e [9,10].

    The improvement of the simple model takes place while

    adding a parasitic branch in parallel (Figure 3).

    I,.

    .. C1SOC )

    978-1-4244-1641-7/08/ 25.00

    2008 IEEE

    Figure 3: Lead-acid battery general model.

    In

    fact, the parasitic branch represents the irreversible

    reactions that take place in the battery as for example the

    electrolysis of water that occurs at the end of the charging

    process, especially in the case of overcharge. In this

    branch an Ip current circulates. The charge stocked in the

    battery is only joined to

    1m

    (current of the main branch, in

    amperes). A part

    of

    the total current

    I,

    which is the

    Ip

    current, is a lost current and cannot be restored.

    The third order

    model

    [11]

    The model is consisted of two main parts: a main branch

    which approximated the battery dynamics under most

    conditions, and a parasitic branch which accounted for the

    battery behavior at the end of a charge. The main branch

    is formed of a R/C block placed in series with a resistance

    (Figure 4). All elements of figure 4 are functions of the

    State

    Of

    Charge (SOC), the charging/discharging currents

    and the temperature of the electrolyte 9.

    RO

    ,...L

    +

    Em

    v

    N

    Figure 4: Lead-acid battery third order model.

    where:

    Em was the main branch voltage,

    R1

    was the main branch resistance,

    C1

    was the main branch capacitance,

    R2 was the main branch resistance,

    I

    01pn)

    was the Parasitic branch current,

    Ro was the Terminal resistance.

    Main branch voltage (Em)

    Equation 1 approximated the internal electro-motive force

    (emf), or open-circuit voltage of one cell. The emf value

    was assumed to be constant when the battery was fully

    charged. The emf varied with temperature and state of

    charge (SOC):

    Em

    =EmO

    -

    KE

    .(273 + 9)(1- SOC) (1)

    where:

    Em was the open-circuit voltage (EMF) in volts,

    Emo

    was the open-circuit voltage at full charge in volts,

    KE was a constant in volts 1

    DC,

    9 was electrolyte temperature in

    DC,

    SOC was battery state of charge.

    Main branch resistance R1

    Equation 2 approximated a resistance in the main branch

    of the battery. The resistance varied with depth of charge,

    a measure of the battery's charge adjusted for the

    discharge current. The resistance increased exponentially

    as the battery became exhausted during a discharge.

    Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 04:54 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

  • 7/24/2019 Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

    3/6

    (2)

    where:

    R1 was a main branch resistance in Ohms,

    R10

    was a constant in Ohms,

    DOC was battery depth of charge.

    Main branch capacitance

    C1

    Equation 3 approximated a capacitance (or time delay) in

    the main branch. The time constant modeled a voltage

    delay when battery current changed.

    C

    1

    =l (3)

    RI

    where:

    C1 was a main branch capacitance in Farads,

    T1 was a main branch time constant in seconds,

    R1

    was a main branch resistance in Ohms.

    Main branch resistance R2

    Equation 4 approximated a main branch resistance. The

    resistance increased exponentially as the battery state

    of

    charge increased.

    The resistance also varied with the current flowing through

    the main branch. The resistance primarily affected the

    battery during charging. The resistance became relatively

    insignificant for discharge currents:

    (4)

    where:

    R2 was a main branch resistance in Ohms,

    R20 was a constant in Ohms,

    A21 was a constant,

    A22 was a constant,

    Em was the open-circuit voltage (EMF) in volts,

    SOC was the battery state of charge,

    1m was the main branch current in Amps,

    1* was the nominal battery current in Amps.

    Terminal resistance RO

    Equation 5 approximated a resistance seen a t the battery

    terminals. The resistance was assumed constant at all

    temperatures, and varied with the state of charge:

    Ro

    =Roo [1

    +

    Ao(I-S0C)]

    (5)

    where:

    Ro was a resistance in Ohms

    Roo was the value of RO at SOC=1 in Ohms

    Ao

    was a constant

    SOC was the battery state of charge

    Parasitic branch current Ip

    Equation 6 approximated the parasitic loss current which

    occurred when the battery was being charged. The current

    was dependent on the electrolyte temperature and the

    voltage at the parasitic branch. The current was very small

    under most conditions, except during charge at high SOC.

    978-1-4244-1641-7/08/ 25.00

    2008 IEEE

    Note that while the constant

    Gpo

    was measured in units of

    seconds, the magnitude of Gpo was very small, on the

    order of 10-

    12

    seconds.

    I

    =V G [V

    PN

    /( t

    p

    .s+l)

    A ( 1 - ~ ) l

    PN. poexp + p (6)

    Vpo Sf

    where:

    Ip

    was the current loss in the parasitic branch,

    VPN

    was the voltage at the parasitic branch,

    GpO was a constant in seconds,

    Tp was a parasitic branch time constant in seconds,

    Vpo was a constant in volts,

    Ap was a constant,

    8 was the electrolyte temperature in DC,

    8t was the electrolyte freezing temperature in DC.

    Some definitions

    Extracted charge Qe

    Equation 7 tracked the amount of charge extracted from

    the battery. The charge extracted from the battery was a

    simple integration of the current flowing into or out of the

    main branch. The initial value of extracted charge was

    necessary for simulation purposes.

    t

    Qe(t) =Qe_init

    +

    f-Im(t).dt

    o

    Total capacity

    C

    (7)

    Equation 8 approximated the capacity of the battery based

    on discharge current and electrolyte temperature.

    However, the capacity dependence on current was only for

    discharge. During charge, the discharge current was set

    equal to zero in Equation 8 for the purposes of calculating

    total capacity.

    C(I,9)

    = K,.C,' ,

    { l - ~ )

    1 + ( K c - l ~ I ~ ) Sf

    (8)

    where:

    Kc

    was a constant,

    Co*

    was the no-load capacity at OC in Amp-seconds,

    8 was the electrolyte temperature in

    DC,

    I was the discharge current in Amps,

    I

    was the nominal battery current in Amps,

    and E were a constant.

    State

    Of

    Charge

    SOC) and

    Depth

    Of

    Charge

    DOC)

    Equations 9 and 10 calculated the SOC and DOC as a

    fraction of available charge to the battery's total capacity.

    State of charge measured the fraction of charge remaining

    in the battery:

    SOC =1- Q

    e

    C(O,S)

    (9)

    Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 04:54 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

  • 7/24/2019 Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

    4/6

    Depth of charge measured the fraction of usable charge

    remaining, given the average discharge current. Larger

    discharge currents caused the battery's charge to expire

    more prematurely, thus DOC was always less than or

    equal to SOC.

    (10)

    where:

    SOC was battery state of charge,

    DOC was battery depth of charge,

    Q

    e

    was the battery's charge in Amp-seconds,

    C was the battery's capacity in Amp-seconds,

    a was the electrolyte temperature in c,

    lavg was the mean discharge current in Amps.

    Estimate

    of

    Average

    urrent

    The average battery current was estimated as follows in

    Equation 11.

    lavg

    =

    1m

    (11)

    (t

    l

    s+l)

    where:

    lavg

    was the mean discharge current in Amps,

    1m

    was the main branch current in Amps,

    T1 was a main branch time constant in seconds.

    Thermal model

    Equation 12 was modeled to estimate the change in

    electrolyte temperature, due to intemal resistive losses

    and due to ambient temperature. The thermal model

    consists of a first order differential equation, with

    parameters for thermal resistance and capacitance.

    (12)

    Where:

    a was the battery's temperature in c,

    aa was the ambient temperature in c,

    aini was the battery's initial temperature in c, assumed

    to be equal to the surrounding ambient temperature,

    P

    s

    was the

    12R

    power loss of Ro and R2 in Watts,

    Re

    was the thermal resistance in c 1Watts,

    Ce was the thermal capacitance in Joules 1C,

    T was an integration time variable,

    t was the simulation time in seconds.

    PARAMETERS IDENTIFICATION

    The mentioned equations of the lead-acid third order

    model contain constants that must be determined

    experimentally by tests in the laboratory. These constants

    or parameters can be divided in four categories:

    - The main branch parameters used in equations 1 to 5:

    EmO,KE

    ,RIO,R20,A21'

    A22 ,Roo,A

    o

    - The parasitic branch parameters used in equation 6:

    978-1-4244-1641-7/08/ 25.00

    2008 IEEE

    Gpo, Vpo,Ap.

    - The capacitance parameters used in equation 8:

    Kc,Co,E,O.

    - The thermal parameters used in equation 12:

    Ca,R

    a

    Main branch parameters identification

    All parameters are calculated experimentally through very

    appropriate tests. The most adequate test is illustrated in

    figure

    5.

    "'0 J)

    J1

    J'oltop

    14

    r

    ummt

    "'3

    1

    Figure 5: Test serving in determining the parameters

    of

    the

    main branch

    of

    the third order lead-acid model.

    To identify Emo and KE, one needs two equations, these

    equations are obtained while measuring the voltage in the

    beginning and at the end

    of

    the test,

    Vo

    and

    V1

    (they are

    equal to the emf at the beginning and at the end). For The

    values

    of

    the load state, SOCbeginning and

    SOCend,

    they can

    be known easily.

    It is sufficient one equation to identify R10. This equation

    was obtained by making the following difference, (V1-V4),

    which is due to the presence

    of

    the resistance R1.

    The main branch resistance is neglected

    R2.

    Same test is applied as for the emf parameters. Roo and Ao

    are identified while measuring the instantaneous drop

    voltage following the application

    of

    the current I.

    Parasitic branch parameters identifi cation

    The identification of the constants GpO, Vpo and Ap is

    obtained by making tests when the battery is completely

    full. In this case, 1m is supposed to be neglected and the

    temperature of the electrolyte can be estimated from the

    ambient temperature.

    Capacitance parameters identification

    This identification needs four equations. To do that, two

    methods can be used. The first one is based on the data

    given by the manufacturer and the second one is based on

    the experimental test.

    Thermal parameters identificat ion

    Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 04:54 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

  • 7/24/2019 Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

    5/6

    The proposed thermal model is very simple. It is formed of

    thermal resistance Re and

    of

    thermal capacitance Ceo

    These two parameters are determined experimentally or

    are given by the manufacturers

    of

    batteries.

    It should be noted that, contrary to all others parameters,

    the thermal resistance depends on the site where the

    battery is placed.

    SIMULATION

    The presented third order model

    of

    the lead-acid battery

    using its identified parameters is used

    in

    Matlab/Simulink

    software in order to validate its functioning. The linearity

    of

    the model is due to the omission

    of

    the parasitic branch in

    the general model.

    Charging state

    To simplify the modeling

    of

    the chosen accumulator, the

    temperature

    of

    the electrolyte is supposed equal to the

    ambient temperature.

    In

    addition:

    - The accumulator is supposed to be empty,

    - The initial extracted charge

    is

    negligible (Qe_init

    =

    ),

    - The ambient temperature is supposed equal to 25C,

    - The initial values

    of

    the SOC and DOC are equal to 0.2.

    The model functioning

    in

    the charging state is illustrated

    in

    figure

    6. In

    fact, before the beginning

    of

    this phenomenon,

    the current

    in

    the model was zero, the voltage is equal to

    1.95 V and the SOC is set to be 0.2. The charging

    of

    the

    module of the studied accumulator takes place with

    constant current equal to 20

    A.

    The duration

    of

    the

    transient state

    is

    about 5000 seconds. During this period,

    the voltage across the model terminals increases

    in

    a

    linear way as far as reaching its maximal value Erno which

    is equal to 2.22

    V.

    Same, the

    SOC

    increases linearly. After

    the accumulator's charging, the voltage becomes equal to

    2.15 V and the SOC approaches to 0.8. This means that

    the accumulator will

    be

    able to continue charging as the

    SOC didn't reach the unity value.

    Figure 6: Battery charging

    Discharging state

    978-1-4244-1641-7/08/ 25.00

    2008 IEEE

    With regard to the discharging phase

    of

    the accumulator,

    several initial conditions are taken into consideration.

    In

    fact:

    - The accumulator is supposed to be completely charged,

    - The initial charge extracted is zero (Qe_init

    =

    ),

    - The ambient temperature is supposed equal to 25C,

    - The initial values

    of

    SOC and DOC are equal to 0.8.

    The phase

    of

    the discharge

    is

    presented

    in

    figure

    7.

    Cum'

    o

    .1 : .: : :'. ': :I ':::: ::: :, : : : : . i : I ~ : : : : : : : : :

    . :::.:::

    : : ~ . ' . ' . : : : ' . : : : ' . - ' : ' [ : 1 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : i

    25L-_-L-_--- -

    L-_--'-_--- '--_-'-_---'-_----'

    Voltage

    Figure 7: Battery discharging.

    In

    general, before the accumulator's connection with a

    load, the voltage across its terminals is equal to 2.15

    V.

    When the load is placed, the accumulator begins to

    provide current. This one is supposed constant. The

    duration

    of

    this phase is supposed to be equal to 5000

    seconds. During this period, the voltage across the model

    terminal decreases in a linear way as far as reaching its

    minimal value. In the same way, the SOC decreases

    linearly. After the accumulator's discharge, the voltage

    becomes equal to 1.95 V and the SOC approaches to 0.2.

    CONCLUSION

    The electric lead-acid batteries are devices that provide

    the electric energy from chemical one. These are electro

    chemical generators. They store the energy that they

    restore according to the needs. They can

    be

    recharged

    when one reverses the chemical reaction; it is what

    differentiates them from the electric batteries.

    These accumulators are used

    in

    several applications, for

    example, they serve to supply electrically the cars, the

    heavy weights, the planes, etc.. One uses them like

    stationary batteries, assuring the lighting and the working

    of

    the embarked devices.

    Seen their interests

    in

    the daily life, the electric lead-acid

    batteries are studied in

    this paper. The principle

    of

    working

    and the battery's modeling are discussed.

    Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 04:54 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

  • 7/24/2019 Parameter Identification of the Lead-Acid Battery Model

    6/6

    Several lead-acid battery models are conceived, for

    example, the mathematical model

    and

    the parallel branch

    model. But the third order model is the simplest one to

    identify.

    As

    conclusion,

    all

    parameters of this model, which is

    studied

    in

    this paper,

    can be

    identified

    by

    laboratory tests

    or taken from the manufacturer's data. The third order

    model of the lead-acid

    has been

    validated

    by

    simulation

    on

    the software Matlab/Simulink.

    REFEREN ES

    [1]

    D.

    Linden et

    T.

    B.

    Reddy,

    "Handbook of Batteries",

    3rd

    edition, McGraw-Hili, New York,

    NY,

    2001.

    [2] Ceraolo, "New Dynamical Models of Lead-Acid

    Batteries", IEEE Transactions

    on

    Power Systems,

    vol.

    15,

    No.4,

    IEEE,

    November 2000.

    [3]

    Robyn

    A. Jackey, "A Simple, Effective Lead-Acid

    Battery Modeling Process for Electrical System

    Component Selection", The MathWorks, Inc., Janvier

    2007.

    [4] Wootaik Lee, Hyunjin

    Park,

    Myoungho Sunwoo,

    Byoungsoo Kim and Dongho Kim. "Development of a

    Vehicle Electric Power Simulator for Optimizing the

    Electric Charging System", SAE, Warrendale, PA,

    2000.

    [5] Massimo Ceraolo, "New Dynamical Models of Lead

    Acid Batteries", IEEE Transactions

    on

    Power

    Systems,

    VOL. 15,

    NO.4, Novembre 2000.

    [6] http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/electricl

    leadacid.html

    [7]

    Stefano Barsali and Massimo Ceraolo, "Dynamical

    Models of Lead-Acid Batteries: Implementation

    Issues", IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,

    VOL. 17,

    NO.1, Mars 2002.

    [8]

    Ziyad

    M.

    Salameh, Margaret,A. Casacca William

    and

    A.

    Lynch, "A Mathematical

    Model

    for Lead-Acid

    Batteries", Departement of Electrical Engineering,

    University of Lowell,

    1992.

    [9]

    Michel

    F.

    de

    Koning and

    Andre Veltman, "modeling

    battery efficiency with parallel branches",

    35th

    annual

    IEEE

    Power Electronics Specialists Conference,

    2004.

    [10]

    Sabine Piller, Marion perrin

    and

    Andreas Jossen,

    "Methods for state of charge determination

    and

    their

    applications", Centre for solar Energy

    and

    Hydrogen

    Research, Joumal of power sources

    96,

    2001.

    [11] Robyn A.

    Jackey,

    "A

    Simple, Effective Lead-Acid

    Battery Modeling Process for Electrical System

    Component Selection", 2007-01-0778, The

    MathWorks,

    Inc.

    978-1-4244-1641-7/08/ 25.00

    2008 IEEE