7/27/2019 OUTSTANDING REQUEST FOR SUPPORT TO ENLIST CFPB TO INTERVENE AND/OR FILE AMICUS----ATTORNEYS AND OTHERS NEEDED TO SUPPORT

1/2

There is an outstanding request for assistance andsupport from other attorneys across the USA. You mayuse this letter as a template and send to the CFPB atamicus@cfpb.govand/or mail or fax to Richard Cordray,

the Director at the CFPB. Homeowners are also welcometo submit this.

October 25, 2013

Richard Cordray

Director

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

1700 G Street, NWWashington, D.C. 20552

(202) 435-7000

Dear Director Cordray:

I am writing to request that you intervene, on behalf of the CFPB, and/or file Amicus briefs in

connection with the following case:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITNo. 13-1821(9: ll-cv-00395-SB)

JAMES P. SCHEIDER, JR.; TAFFY G. SCHEIDER Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the IndyMac INDA

Mortgage Loan 2006-AR2 Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2006- AR2 under the

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated August 1, 2006; INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES;MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; ONEWEST

BANK, F.S.B.; FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF

CHARLESTON

and

I, Defendants - Appellees I

INDYMAC BANK FEDERAL BANK; MERS, INCORPORATED; MORTGAGE NETWORKINCORPORATED; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JOHN DOE

1-1000, inclusive, representing a class of unknown persons who claim or have the right to claim

an interest in certain real property located in Beaufort County, South Carolina; INDYMAC MBSINCORPORATED

mailto:amicus@cfpb.govmailto:amicus@cfpb.gov

7/27/2019 OUTSTANDING REQUEST FOR SUPPORT TO ENLIST CFPB TO INTERVENE AND/OR FILE AMICUS----ATTORNEYS AND OTHERS NEEDED TO SUPPORT

2/2

Defendants

MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS TO NEW YORK STATE COURT OFAPPEALS

This case may be one of the most important in the country regarding a homeowners right tochallenge defects in securitization. If decided against homeowners it would have a devastating

and long lasting impact.

This Motion for Certification to the Fourth District Court of Appeals arises out of a ruling by a

South Carolina court that is directly contrary to the well- reasoned decisions of numerous courts

around the country. Virtually all judges and courts of appeal to address the question, have

decided contrary to the South Carolina court, in many different states and types of courts. Thisincludes the recently published California decision in Glaski v. Bank of America, ___ F.3d ___

[2013 WL 3480207], the Alabama Court of Appeals, the Illinois Court of Appeals, the New

York trial courts, Texas bankruptcy courts, and others (Attached). In addition at least one class

action has been certified on this basis (Attached, and now on Interlocutory Appeal).

Scholarly articles have also been written discussing the legal theories involved. I am attachingthe items mentioned above. I am also hopeful that many other public and private organizations

around the country will also support the Appellants and intend to circulate and publish this to as

many advocates as I can.

Sincerely,

YOUR NAMEYOUR ADDRESS

YOUR PHONE

YOUR EMAIL

cc: Antonia C. Lucia, Attorney for Appellants843-352-4435 FAX 843-757-2889

Vaux & Marscher, P.A.

1251 May River Road, Post Office Box 769

Bluffton, SC 29910antonia.lucia@vaux-marscher.com

mailto:antonia.lucia@vaux-marscher.commailto:antonia.lucia@vaux-marscher.com