Outline

19
Search Engines for Extracting, Managing, and Analyzing Knowledge from the SEC Filings in XBRL and Beyond Rajendra P. Srivastava Ernst & Young Professor and Director E&Y Center for Auditing Research Adv. Technology 13th World Continuous Auditing & Reporting Faculty of Economics, University of Via Voltapaletto, 11, Ferrara (Italy), June 15-16, 2007

description

Search Engines for Extracting, Managing, and Analyzing Knowledge from the SEC Filings in XBRL and Beyond. Rajendra P. Srivastava Ernst & Young Professor and Director E&Y Center for Auditing Research Adv. Technology 13th World Continuous Auditing & Reporting Faculty of Economics, University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Outline

Page 1: Outline

Search Engines for Extracting, Managing, and Analyzing Knowledge

from the SEC Filings in XBRL and Beyond

Rajendra P. SrivastavaErnst & Young Professor and Director

E&Y Center for Auditing Research Adv. Technology

13th World Continuous Auditing & Reporting

Faculty of Economics, University of Via Voltapaletto, 11, Ferrara (Italy),

June 15-16, 2007

Page 2: Outline

Outline Background of FRAANK (Financial Reporting and

Auditing Agent with Net Knowledge)

Current Features of FRAANK 2.1

Knowledge Extraction by FRAANK from SEC Filings

Role of FRAANK 2.1 in Creating Empirically Based Industry Specific Taxonomies

Live Demonstration

SEEK_INF (Search Engine for Extracting Knowledge from Industrial Filings)

Page 3: Outline

Background of FRAANK

Spring 1996: FRAANK was born to Capture 10Ks and 10Qs from SEC Edgar database Parse BS, IS and CF to create electronic Documents

2001: Adopted to XBRL Taxonomy 1.0 2002-06: Text Parsing, Tagging, and Display

Items on 10K and Footnotes to FS Auditor’s Report Intelligence to find Auditor, Place, Date, and Type

2005-07: Moved to XBRL Taxonomy 2.1 2007: FRAANK 2.1

Page 4: Outline

Academic Publications on FRAANK (http://www.eycarat.ku.edu)

2000: Nelson, Kogan, Srivastava, Vasarhelyi, Lu. Virtual Auditing Agents: The EDGAR Agent Challenge, Decision Support Systems (28) 3: 241-253.

2002: Bovee, Ettredge, Srivastava, Vasarhelyi. Does the Year 2000 XBRL Taxonomy Accommodate Current Business Financial Reporting Practice?” Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 2, Fall: 165-182.

2005: Bovee, Kogan, Srivastava, Vasarhelyi, Nelson. Financial Reporting and Auditing Agent with Net Knowledge (FRAANK) and eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL). Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Spring): pp. 19-41.

Page 5: Outline

Current Features of FRAANK 2.1

Uses XBRL 2.1 Taxonomy (Calculation Tree) Parses BS, IS, CF in 10Ks and 10Qs and tags them

using XBRL 2.1 Creates KU_Tags for items not found in XBRL

2.1 Creates a database of line items identified as

not having XBRL 2.1 tags Parses Non-Financial Information in 10K

Items, Footnotes, Audit Report, SOX 404 Report Identifies auditor, place, date, type, and tags using

XBRL 2.1 Identifies Effective & In-effective SOX 404 Report

Page 6: Outline
Page 7: Outline
Page 8: Outline
Page 9: Outline
Page 10: Outline
Page 11: Outline
Page 12: Outline
Page 13: Outline
Page 14: Outline
Page 15: Outline
Page 16: Outline
Page 17: Outline
Page 18: Outline
Page 19: Outline

Questions!