GUIDELINES FOR RAPID ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN DISASTERS
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment · PDF fileNatural Disasters and Impact...
Transcript of Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment · PDF fileNatural Disasters and Impact...
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Prof. Paulo C. SentelhasUniversity of São Paulo, Brazil
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO) Italy - May 2006
Presentation Outline
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
a) A brief overview about agriculture and climate in Brazil
b) The main natural disasters that affect Brazilianagriculture
c) Focusing on Northeastern Brazil as priority regionfor ANADIA pilot project
d) A proposal for ANADIA pilot project in Brazil
e) Activities demanded for implementation ofANADIA pilot project in NE Brazil
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Agriculture or Agribusiness is one of the maineconomical activities in Brazil, responsable for:
• 35% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
• 42% of Exportations
• 37% of Employments
Brazil has 388 millions ha of agricultural lands (90 millions are not still used)
Weather/Climate is the main factor responsable for crop diversity, production levels and yield variability
Brief overview about agriculture andclimate in Brazil
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Brazil is a huge country, withdifferent climates
Rainfall and AvgTemp in differentregions of Brazil
Manaus, AM
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Ave
rage
Tem
p (o C
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Rai
nfal
l (m
m)
RainfallAvg Temp
Cuiabá, MT
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Ave
rage
Tem
p (o C
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Rai
nfal
l (m
m)
RainfallAvg Temp
Santa Maria, RS
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Ave
rage
Tem
p (o C
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Rai
nfal
l (m
m)
RainfallAvg Temp
Pindorama, SP
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Ave
rage
Tem
p (o C
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Rai
nfal
l (m
m)
RainfallAvg Temp
Recife, PE
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Ave
rage
Tem
p (o C
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Rai
nfal
l (m
m)
RainfallAvg Temp
Quixeramobim, CE
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Ave
rage
Tem
p (o C
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Rai
nfal
l (m
m)
RainfallAvg Temp
Carolina, MA
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Ave
rage
Tem
p (o C
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Rai
nfal
l (m
m)RainfallAvg Temp
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
These climates result in different water balance regimes, which basically determine the crop zonning
Climatological WaterBalance for different
regions of Brazil
Extrato do Balanço Hídrico Mensal
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
Extrato do Balanço Hídrico Mensal
-180-160-140-120-100-80-60-40-20
02040
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
Extrato do Balanço Hídrico Mensal
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
Extrato do Balanço Hídrico Mensal
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
Extrato do Balanço Hídrico Mensal
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
Extrato do Balanço Hídrico Mensal
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
Extrato do Balanço Hídrico Mensal
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Rain Forest
SubsistenceAgriculture
High- TechAgriculture
Humidclimate
Super-humidclimate
Semi-aridclimate
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Based on the normal climate of each region of the country, the main natural disasters that affect Brazilian agriculture
are:
• Droughts in humid regions:
Amazon region
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Increase of Forest Fires
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Droughts in Amazon region are intensified during years of El Niño
DRY
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
• Droughts in humid regions:
Southern Brazil
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Droughts in Southern Brazil are intensified during years of La Niña
DRY
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Ano agrícola
Ren
dim
ento
(kg/
ha)
DroughtsDroughts in in thethe southsouth ofof thethe country country affectaffect mainlymainlysoybeansoybean productionproduction, , reducingreducing itsits yieldyield
Source: IBGE and CONAB
State of Rio Grande do Sul ≈ 4 millions ha of soybean
Year
Soyb
ean
yiel
d(k
g ha
-1)
Effect of droughts on soybean yield
In 2005, growers´ losses in RS werearound USD 2.5 millions
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
• Droughts in semi-arid regions:
Years with justregular droughts
Years withvery intense
droughts
Subsistenceproduction
No production
NortheasternBrazil
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
DRY
Droughts in Northeastern Brazil are intensified duringyears of El Niño
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
• Frosts in Southern BrazilRegions affected by frosts in Brazil, with
their respectives frequencies
Frost advising system - CPTEC/INPE
High frequency Medium frequency Low frequency Very low frequency
Frost RiskHighMediumLow
State Capital
Federal Capital
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
• Frosts in Southern Brazil affect mainly coffee plantations in thestates of Paraná, São Paulo and Minas Gerais, with yield reductionsof 30-50%, depending on frost intensity.
Number of days with frost per 10 years in some places of the State of
Paraná, Southern Brazil
Place # Frosts per 10 years
Cambará 31 Cascavel 47 Clevelândia 124 Guarapuava 130 Londrina 18 Paranavaí 13 Pinhais 114 Ponta Grossa 109
Source: Grodsky et al. (1997)
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Arborization or Shading
Coffee x Banana
Coffee x Bracatinga
Coffee x Dwarf Coconut
Coffee x Pinus
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Coffee yield x Arborization
90 9097 100
93
78
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 26 34 50 83 120 250
Trees ha-1
Rel
ativ
e yi
eld
(%)
Source: Caramori et al. (1997)
Arborization or Shading
Avg coffee yield in all years with and without frost
722925066418365845043400
Processed coffee yield (kg/ha)Trees / haArborization or Shading
Avg coffee yield in years with frost
Source: Caramori et al. (1995)
Yield increased 34%
Yield increased 10%
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
• Floods in Southern Brazil
It is a serious problem for urban areas. For agricultural lands, flood is not reported as a very important problem and few data are available to evaluate its impact on cropproduction. However, in some years intenserainfall followed by floods can affectsowing, harvesting, and pests controling.
Flood potentialareas in Southern
Brazil
Floods in Southern Brazil are intensified during years of El Niño
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Rainy
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Considering the impacts caused by the main natural disasters onthe Brazilian agriculture and their consequences to the socio-economic parameters, drought in Northeastern region of the
country seems to be the most importante natural disaster to befocused by ANADIA pilot project
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Northeastern Brazil has:• 18% of national territory
• 30% of the population of the country (≈ 48 million people)
• 9% of the national GDP
• 8% of the national grain production
• 32% of the population (15 million people) is under the poverty line, living with less than USD1.00 per day
• Climates: Am = tropical monsoon (8%)Aw = tropical humid and dry (35%)Bsh = semi-arid (57%)
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
• Familiar agriculture – 85% of properties
• 20 people per km2 in the semi-arid area (one ofthe most populated semi-arid region of the world)
• Very low crop yield (agric. of subsistence)
• Enough water to irrigate only 20-30% of thesemi-arid region
• High frequency of moderate/severe droughts:1 severe or moderate drought / 12 years
• High yield losses during these events40 – 50% of losses in average, but achieving > 70% when very severe droughts occur
Northeastern Brazil has:
1555
1570
1585
1600
1615
1630
1645
1660
1675
1690
1705
1720
1735
1750
1765
1780
1795
1810
1825
1840
1855
1870
1885
1900
1915
1930
1945
1960
1975
1990
2005
Year
Dro
ught
inte
nsity
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
M
S
VS
Drought frequency in Northeastern Brazil
38 moderate to severe droughts in 447 years ⇒ ≈ 1 drought each 12 years
Considering only the last 100 years ⇒ ≈ 1 drought each 6 years
Adapted from Ministry of Environment
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
The intense drought of 1997-1998 (El Niño year) caused losses of:
77% ⇒ cowpea crop
77% ⇒ maize crop
42% ⇒ rice crop
92% ⇒ cotton crop
83% ⇒ cashew nut
±45% ⇒ cattle and other animals
Sou
rce:
Dua
rte (2
000)
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Water balance for Crateus, CE, Brazil (1961-1990)
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
Water balance for Bom Jesus do Piaui, PI, Brazil (1961-1990)
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Jan Fev Mar Abr Mai Jun Jul Ago Set Out Nov Dez
mm
DEF(-1) EXC
Climatological WaterBalance for Normal Years in
NE Brazil
Period for crop production
Very short growing season
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Climatological Water Balance for Petrolina, PE, Brazil in 1993
Total rainfall = 188 mm (Normal = 610 mm)
Total ETo = 2232 mm
Severe droughtWater Balance for Petrolina, PE, Brazil - 1993
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
J F M A M J J A S O N D
mm
Water Deficiency Water Surplus
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
A proposal for ANADIA Pilot Project in Brazil
Drought Impacts on Cowpea (Vignaunguiculata) in Northeastern Brazil – A
Case Study for State of Piauí
Possible Brazilian Institutions involvedINMET - Brazilian Met-ServiceUSP - University of São Paulo
UNICAMP - State University of CampinasEMBRAPA - Brazilian Agricultural Research Center
CPTEC – Weather Forecast and Climatic Studies Center
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Drought Impacts on Cowpea (Vignaunguiculata) in Northeastern Brazil – A
Case Study for State of Piauí
Main ObjectivesImprove the understanding of drought frequency and intensity
in the State of Piauí and their relationships with cowpea yield;
Reduce the impact of moderate – intense droughts on cowpea
production in State of Piauí;
Improve the stability of food offer to this region;
Give subsidize to improve water use efficiency in irrigated
cowpea crop
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Why cowpea? It is the main crop at semi-arid region of Brazil.
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Importance of cowpea crop for Northeastern Brazil
Main source of protein for people of this region of
the country
Cowpea crop represents 95 to 100% of the areas
cultivated with beans
Average yield: rainfed crop = 350 kg/ha
irrigated crop = 1500 kg/ha
Droughts can reduce rainfed yield for zero and
increase water required for irrigated crop, with
yield reduction where enough water is not available
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Rainfall and climatic risk for cowpea crop in the State of PiauíAnnual Rainfall State
of Piauí, Brazil
Low
Med
ium
Hig
h
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Fluxogram of the Structure of ANADIA Pilot Project for Brazil
ANADIA Pilot Project - Brazil
Drought Monitoring Drought ForecastImpact AssessmentEMBRAPA and USP
INMETEMBRAPA UNICAMP
INMET CPTEC
Sate
llite
Imag
es
Wat
ersu
pplie
s
Cro
pw
ater
requ
irem
ent
Cro
pyi
eld
depl
etio
n
Rainfall, ETo, climaticwater balance, drought
indeces
El Niño and La Niñaconditions
Drought Plan Evaluation
Mitigation ToolsRainfed crop Irrigated crop
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
ANADIA Pilot ProjectDrought Monitoring
State of Piauí Brazil
Monitoring – rainfall, referenceevapotranspiration, droughtindices and climatological waterbalance
Weather Stations (INMET) Weather Stations (EMBRAPA)
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Drought Forecast
Climatic ForecastEl Niño/La Niña Monitoring
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Impact Assessment on ...
... rainfed crops
... irrigated crops
• crop water balance• crop yield depletion by simulation models• greenness of ground cover by satellite images
• crop water requirement (crop ET)• water supplies• crop yield depletion by simulation models• greenness of ground cover by satellite images
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Activities demanded for implementation of
ANADIA pilot project in NE Brazil
Drought Statistics: intensity, frequency, and spatial
variability
Education on drought(general population)
Interaction of science andpolicy
Publicity
Agrometeorological research: deficit irrigation, crop
zonning, climatic risk for cowpea, etc...
ANADIA Task Force Meeting (WMO), Italy - May 2006
Natural Disasters and Impact Priorities for Assessment in Brazil
Thank you Grazie Merci
University of São Paulo / Piracicaba / Brazil
Danke Gracias Obrigado