Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

download Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

of 14

Transcript of Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    1/14

    Hydrogen Bomb Accident

    1966

    The debris of a crashed American plane in January 1966 in Palomares, Spain

    Alarms sounded on United States Air Force bases in Spain and officers began packing all the low-ranking

    troops they could grab onto buses for a secret mission. There were cooks, grocery clerks and even

    musicians from the Air Force band. t was a late winter night in !"## and a fully loaded $-%& bomber on

    a 'old (ar nuclear patrol had collided with a refueling )et high over the Spanish coast, freeing four

    hydrogen bombs that went tumbling toward a farming village called *alomares, a patchwork of small

    fields and tile-roofed white houses in an out-of-the-way corner of Spain+s rugged southern coast that had

    changed little since oman times.

    t was one of the biggest nuclear accidents in history, and the United States wanted it cleaned up

    uickly and uietly. $ut if the men getting onto buses were told anything about the Air Force+s plan for

    them to clean up spilled radioactive material, it was usually, /on+t worry.0 There was no talk about

    radiation or plutonium or anything else,0 said Frank $. Thompson, a then &&-year-old trombone player

    who spent days searching contaminated fields without protective euipment or even a change of clothes.

    Page 1of 14

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    2/14

    They told us it was safe, and we were dumb enough, guess, to believe them.0 1r. Thompson, 2&, now

    has cancer in his liver, a lung and a kidney. 3e pays 4&,&55 a month for treatment that would be free at a

    6eterans Affairs hospital if the Air Force recogni7ed him as a victim of radiation. $ut for %5 years, the Air

    Force has maintained that there was no harmful radiation at the crash site. t says the danger of

    contamination was minimal and strict safety measures ensured that all of the !,#55 troops who cleaned it

    up were protected.

    John H !arman

    nterviews with do7ens of men like 1r. Thompson and details from never before published

    declassified documents tell a different story. adiation near the bombs was so high it sent the military+s

    monitoring euipment off the scales. Troops spent months shoveling to8ic dust, wearing little more

    protection than cotton fatigues. And when tests taken during the cleanup suggested men had alarmingly

    high plutonium contamination, the Air Force threw out the results, calling them clearly unrealistic.0 n

    the decades since, the Air Force has purposefully kept radiation test results out of the men+s medical files

    and resisted calls to retest them, even when the calls came from one of the Air Force+s own studies.

    1any men say they are suffering with the crippling effects of plutonium poisoning. 9f :5 veteranswho helped with the cleanup who The ;ew

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    3/14

    1any of the Americans who cleaned up after the bombs are trying to get full health care coverage and

    disability compensation from the /epartment of 6eterans Affairs. $ut the department relies on Air Force

    records, and since the Air Force records say no one was harmed in *alomares, the agency re)ects claims

    again and again. The Air Force also denies any harm was done to %55 other veterans who cleaned up a

    nearly identical crash in Thule, @reenland, in !"#. Those veterans tried to sue the /efense /epartment in

    !""%, but the case was dismissed because federal law shields the military from negligence claims bytroops. All of the named plaintiffs have since died of cancer. n a statement, the Air Force 1edical Service

    said it had recently used modern techniues to reassess the radiation risk to veterans who cleaned up the

    *alomares accident and adverse acute health effects were neither e8pected nor observed, and long-term

    risks for increased incidence of cancer to the bone, liver and lungs were low.0

    The to8ic aftermath of war is often ve8ing to untangle. /amage is hard to uantify and all but

    impossible to connect to later problems. ecogni7ing this, 'ongress has passed laws in the past to give

    automatic benefits to veterans of a few specific e8posures B Agent 9range in 6ietnam or the atomic tests

    in ;evada, among others. $ut no such law e8ists for the men who cleaned up *alomares. f the men could

    prove they were harmed by radiation, they would have all costs for their associated medical care covered

    and would get a modest disability pension. $ut proof from a secret mission to clean up an invisible poison

    decades ago has proved elusive. So each time the men apply, the Air Force says they were not harmed and

    the department hands out denials. First they denied was even there, then they denied there was any

    radiation,0 said onald . 3owell, 2!, who recently had a brain tumor removed. submit a claim, and

    they deny. submit appeal, and they deny. ;ow +m all out of appeals.0 3e sighed, then continued. *retty

    soon, we+ll all be dead and they will have succeeded at covering this whole thing up.

    The Day the Bombs Fell

    A &C-year-old military police officer named =ohn 3. @arman arrived by helicopter at the crash site on =an.!2, !"##, a few hours after the bombs blew. t was )ust chaos,0 1r. @arman, now 2:, said in an interview

    at his home in *ahrump, ;ev. (reckage was all over the village. A big part of the bomber had crashed

    down in the yard of the school. 3e was one of the first on the scene, and )oined a half-do7en others to

    hunt for the four missing nuclear weapons. 9ne bomb had thudded into a soft sandbank near the beach

    and crumpled but remained intact. Another had dropped into the ocean, where it was found unbroken two

    months later, after a fren7ied hunt.

    The other two hit hard and e8ploded, leaving house-si7e craters on either side of the village, according to

    a secret Atomic >nergy 'ommission report that has since been declassified. $uilt-in safeguards prevented

    nuclear detonations, but e8plosives surrounding the radioactive cores blasted a fine dust of plutonium

    over a patchwork of houses and fields full of ripe, red tomatoes.

    A throng of residents led 1r. @arman to the plutonium-covered craters, where they peered down at the

    shattered wreckage, not knowing what to do. (e didn+t have any radiation detectors yet, so we had no

    idea if we were in danger,0 he said. (e )ust stood there looking down at the hole.0

    Atomic >nergy 'ommission scientists soon arrived and took 1r. @arman+s clothes because they were

    contaminated, he said, but told him he would be fine. Twelve years later, he got bladder cancer.

    Page 3of 14

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    4/14

    *lutonium does not emit the type of penetrating radiation often associated with nuclear blasts, which

    causes immediately obvious health effects, such as burns. t shoots off alpha particles that travel only a

    few inches and cannot penetrate the skin. 9utside the body, scientists say, it is relatively harmless, but

    specks absorbed in the body, usually through inhaling dust, shoot off a continuous shower of radioactive

    particles thousands of times a minute, gradually e8acting damage that can cause cancer and other diseases

    decades later. A microgram, or a millionth of a gram, in the body is considered potentially harmful.

    According to declassified Atomic >nergy 'ommission reports, the bombs at *alomares released an

    estimated seven pounds B more than C billion micrograms.

    "ictor B S#aar, no$ %9, $or#ed $ith the testing team at the crash site &'id $e follo$ protocol() he said &Hell, no *e

    had neither the time nor the e+uipment)

    The day after the crash, busloads of troops started arriving from United States bases, bringing radiation-

    detection euipment. (illiam =ackson, a young Air Force lieutenant, helped with some of the first testing

    near the craters, using a hand-held alpha particle counter that could measure up to two million alpha

    particles per minute.

    Almost everywhere we pointed the machine it pegged at the highest reading,0 he said. $ut we were told

    that type of radiation would not penetrate the skin. (e were told it was safe.0

    The *entagon focused on finding the bomb lost in the ocean and largely ignored the danger of loose

    plutonium, the Air Force personnel at the site said. Troops traipsed needlessly through highly

    contaminated tomato fields with no safety gear. 1any came to gawk at the shattered bombs in the first

    few days. 9nce went to check on the @. .s and found them dangling their legs into the crater,0 1r.

    =ackson said. =ust sitting there, eating their bo8 lunches.0

    Accounts of the crash became front-page news in >urope and the United States. American and Spanish

    officials immediately tried to cover up the accident and play down the risk. They blocked off the village

    and denied nuclear weapons or radiation were involved in the crash. (hen an American reporter spotted

    men wearing white coveralls, a military press officer told him, 9h, they+re members of the postal

    detachment.0

    Page 4of 14

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    5/14

    9nce e8istence of the bombs leaked, more than a month later, the United States admitted that one bomb,

    not two, had cracked,0 but had released only a small amount of basically harmless radiation.0

    Today the two e8ploded warheads would be known as dirty bombs, and would probably cause

    evacuations. At the time, in order to minimi7e the significance of the blast, the Air Force let villagers

    remain in place.

    9fficials invited the news media to witness Spain+s minister of information, 1anuel Fraga ribarne, and

    United States ambassador, Angier $iddle /uke, splashing on a nearby beach to show the area was safe.

    1r. /uke told reporters, f this is radioactivity, love it.0

    Air orce personnel $earing mas#s and glo-es $or#ing in the fields $here

    three of the bombs $ere found

    A Hurried .leanup

    Fearing that the bombs could damage the tourism industry, Spain insisted the mess be cleaned up before

    summer. (ithin days, troops were hacking down contaminated fields of tomato vines with machetes.

    Though scientists overseeing the cleanup knew plutonium dust posed the greatest danger, military

    commanders had the troops throw thousands of truckloads of vines into chipping machines, then burned

    much of the debris near the village.

    Page 5of 14

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    6/14

    Some men doing the dustiest work were given coveralls and paper surgical masks for safety, but a later

    report by the /efense ;uclear Agency said, t is doubtful that the use of the surgical mask served more

    than a psychological barrier.0 f it did something for your psychology to wear one, you were privileged

    to wear one,0 the chief scientific adviser, /r. (right 3. ?angham, told Atomic >nergy colleagues in a

    secret briefing afterward. t wouldn+t do you any good in the way of protection, but if you felt better, we

    let you wear it.0

    'ommenting on safety at the cleanup, /r. ?angham, who is perhaps best known now for his role in secret

    e8periments in which hospital patients in the United States were unwittingly in)ected with plutonium, told

    colleagues, 1ost of the time it would hardly meet the standards of the health physics manuals.0 The Air

    Force bought tons of contaminated tomatoes from local fields that the Spanish public refused to eat. To

    assure the public there was no danger, commanders fed the tomatoes to the troops. Though the risk from

    eating plutonium is much lower than the risk from inhaling it, it is still not safe.

    /r !arman0s 19%9 military clinical records, $hich indicate plutonium eposure in Spain

    $reakfast, lunch and dinner. (e had them until we were sick of them,0 said (ayne 3ugart, 2:, who was

    a military police officer at the site. They kept saying there was nothing wrong with them.0 n all, the Air

    Force cut down #55 acres of crops and plowed under the contaminated dirt. Troops scooped up %,C55

    barrels of soil from the most radioactive areas near the craters and loaded the barrels on ships to be buried

    in a secure nuclear waste storage site in South 'arolina.

    Page 6of 14

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    7/14

    Spanish and American authorities assured villagers that they had nothing to fear. The villagers,

    accustomed to living in a dictatorship, did little to protest. >ven if some people here might have wanted

    to know more, Franco was in charge, so everybody was too scared to ask anything,0 said Antonio ?atorre,

    a villager who is now 2. To assure villagers their homes were safe, the Air Force sent young airmen into

    local houses with hand-held radiation detectors. *eter 1. icard, then a &5-year-old cook with no training

    on the euipment, remembers being told to perform scans of anything locals wanted, but to keep his

    detector turned off. (e were )ust supposed to feign our readings so we didn+t cause turmoil with the

    natives,0 he said in an interview. often think about that now. wasn+t too smart back then. They say do

    it and you )ust say, D

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    8/14

    /id we follow protocolE 3ell, no. (e had neither the time nor the euipment,0 said 6ictor $. Skaar, now

    2", who worked on the testing team. The formula for determining the contamination level reuired

    collecting urine for !& hours, but he said he was able to get only a single sample from many men. And

    others, he said, were never tested at all. 3e sent samples to the Air Force+s chief of radiation testing, /r.

    ?awrence T. 9dland, who started seeing alarmingly high results. /r. 9dland decided the e8treme levels

    did not indicate a true health threat, but were caused by plutonium loose in the camp that contaminated

    the men+s hands, their clothes and everything else. 3e threw out about !,555 samples B #2 percent of the

    results B including all samples from the first days after the blasts when e8posure was probably highest.

    ;ow ": and living in a rambling 6ictorian house in 3illsboro, 9hio, where a photo from the @reenland

    crash hangs in his hall, /r. 9dland uestioned his decision. (e had no way of knowing what was from

    contamination and what was from inhalation,0 he said. (as the world ending or was everything fineE

    )ust had to make a call.0 3e said he never got accurate results for hundreds of men who may have been

    contaminated. n addition, he soon reali7ed plutonium lodged in the lungs could not always be detected in

    veterans+ urine, and men with clean samples might still be contaminated. t+s sad, sure, it+s sad,0 he said.

    $ut what can you doE

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    9/14

    'onvinced that the urine samples were inadeuate, /r. 9dland persuaded the Air Force in !"## to set up a

    permanent *lutonium /eposition egistry $oard0 to monitor the men for life. >8perts from the Air

    Force, Army, ;avy, 6eterans Administration Gnow the /epartment of 6eterans AffairsH and Atomic

    >nergy 'ommission met to establish the program shortly after the cleanup. n welcoming remarks, the Air

    Force general in charge said the program was essential0 and following the men to their graves would

    provide urgently needed data.0

    The organi7ers proposed not notifying troops of their radiation e8posure and keeping details of testing out

    of medical records, according to minutes of the meeting, out of concern notifying them could set a stage

    for legal action.0 The plan was to have /r. 9dland+s staff follow the men. (ithin months, though, he had

    hit a wall. 3e is not able to get the support from the /epartment of /efense to go after the remaining

    people or set up a real registry because of the sleeping-dog policy,0 an Atomic >nergy 'ommission memo

    from !"#2 noted. The sleeping dog policyE t was to leave it alone. ?et it lie. didn+t agree. 3ell no,

    didn+t agree,0 /r. 9dland said. >veryone decided we should watch these guys, take care of them. And

    then from somewhere up high they decided it was better to get rid of it.0

    /r. 9dland did not know who gave the order to terminate the program, but said since the board included

    all the military branches and the veterans agency, it likely came from top-level officials. The Air Force

    officially dismantled the program in !"#. The permanent0 board had met )ust once.

    Arthur indler, at right in center photo, $as among those Air orce personnel responding to the crash

    After .leanup, Sic#ness

    Page 9of 14

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    10/14

    Troops started to get sick soon after the cleanup ended. 3ealthy men in their &5s were crippled by )oint

    pain, headaches and weakness. /octors said it was arthritis. A young military policeman was plagued by

    sinus swelling so acute that he would bang his head on the floor to distract himself from the pain. /octors

    said it was allergies. Several men got rashes or growths. An airman named ;oris ;. *aul had cysts severe

    enough that he spent si8 months in the hospital in !"#2 getting skin grafts. 3e also became infertile. ;o

    one knew what was wrong with me,0 1r. *aul said.

    A grocery supply clerk named Arthur Iindler, who had been so covered in plutonium while searching the

    tomato fields a few days after the blast that the Air Force made him wash off in the ocean and took his

    clothes, got testicular cancer and a rare lung infection that nearly killed him four years after the crash. n

    the years since, he has had cancer of his lymph nodes three times. t took me a long time to start to

    reali7e this maybe had to do with cleaning up the bombs,0 1r. Iindler, 2:, said in an interview from his

    home in Tucson. ventually, )ust gave up.0

    /r indler, $ho had been so co-ered in plutonium $hile searching the tomato fields a fe$ days after the crash that the

    Air orce made him $ash off in the ocean and too# his clothes, got testicular cancer and a rare lung infection that nearly

    #illed him four years after the crash

    Spain0s /onitoring

    Page 10of 14

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    11/14

    The United States promised to pay for long-term monitoring of health in the village, but for decades it

    provided only about !% percent of funding, with Spain paying the rest, according to a declassified

    /epartment of >nergy summary. $roken air-monitoring stations went unfi8ed and euipment was often

    old and unreliable. n the early !"25s, an Atomic >nergy 'ommission scientist noted, the Spanish field

    monitoring team consisted of a lone graduate student. eports of two children dying of leukemia during

    that time went uninvestigated. The lead Spanish scientist monitoring the population told American

    counterparts in a !"2# memo that, in light of the leukemia cases, *alomares needed some kind of

    medical surveillance of the population to keep watch for diseases or deaths.0 ;one was created.

    n the late !""5s, after years of pressure from Spain, the United States agreed to increase funding. ;ew

    surveys of the village found e8tensive contamination that had gone undetected, including some areas

    where radiation was &5 times the permissible level for inhabited areas. n &55:, Spain uietly fenced off

    the most contaminated land near the bomb craters. Since then, Spain has urged the United States to finish

    cleaning the site. $ecause of the uneven monitoring, the effect on public health is far from clear. A small

    mortality study in &55% found cancer rates had gone up in the village compared with similar villages in

    the region, but the author, *edro Antonio 1artJne7 *inilla, an epidemiologist, cautioned that the results

    could be because of random error, and urged more study.

    At that time, a United States /epartment of >nergy scientist, Terry 3amilton, proposed another study,

    noting problems in Spain+s monitoring techniues. t was clear the uptake of plutonium was poorly

    understood,0 he said in an interview. The department did not approve his proposal. Spanish officials say

    the fears may be overblown.

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    12/14

    7olan *atson, also among those at the crash site, had problems $ith painful 8oints, #idney stones

    and localied s#in cancer :n ;

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    13/14

    to give personal testimony about his plutonium e8posure. n the center+s waiting room, his nose began to

    bleed.

    A few years ago, after his first claim was denied, 1r. (atson+s wife began hunting down old government

    documents, hoping she might find something to prove the Air Force was covering up *alomares. 1aybe,

    she thought, she could discover evidence that would make the authorities reconsider. She turned up

    reports going back :5 years that confirmed the men+s stories of high radiation levels and poor safety

    standards. $ut her most striking find was an Air Force study from &55! that reassessed the contamination

    in *alomares veterans. The study determined that the old urine tests were so flawed that they were not

    useful0 and the Air Force should retest the men.

    1rs. (atson knew no retesting had been done, so she called the Air Force 1edical Service to ask why.

    (hen she could not get a clear answer, she asked her congressman at the time, *aul $roun, epublican of

    @eorgia, to send a letter to the Air Force. (hen the congressman could not get a clear answer, either, he

    proposed legislation, which the 3ouse passed in &5!C, reuiring the Air Force to answer to 'ongress. n

    &5!C, the Air Force provided its legally reuired response in a letter to the 3ouse Armed Services

    'ommittee. To 1rs. (atson+s dismay, it echoed what she and the congressman had already been toldK

    ;ew testing recommended in the &55! report was not necessary0 because troops had worn protective

    euipment, and the original urine tests showed that almost no one had been e8posed to radiation.

    /eclassified documents and witness accounts raise serious uestions about the accuracy of the Air Force+s

    report to 'ongress. After issuing the letter, the Air Force 1edical Service uietly took down from its

    website the only public copy of the &55! report.

    As a ;;>year>old dog handler, /r *atson slept in the dirt 8ust feet from one of the bomb craters the day after the blast

    Page 13of 14

  • 7/25/2019 Mil Hist - CW Hydrogen Bomb Accident 1966

    14/14

    had gone into this thinking it was )ust an old mistake, but then found they were still trying to cover it

    up,0 1rs. (atson said in an interview at her home. 'ol. Iirk *hillips, who oversees the radiation health

    program for the Air Force 1edical Service, said in a recent interview that the Air Force has tried its best

    to do right by the *alomares veterans. t took down the report because it did not want to raise the hopes of

    veterans and feared readers would find it confusing.0 (e have a large number of veterans we believe

    were not e8posed,0 he said. adiation levels at *alomares were low, he said, and men wore safety

    euipment. etesting them with more precise modern techniues, as the &55! report suggested, could

    reveal even lower contamination levels, making it even less likely that the veterans would get

    compensation from the department. (e think retesting could be a real mistake,0 he said. t could harm

    our veterans because we think it would find even lower levels of radiation.0

    n the interest of giving *alomares veterans what he called the benefit of the doubt,0 he said, the Air

    Force stopped relying in &5!C on the old urine test results and instead assigned all troops who cleaned up

    the site a worst-case scenario0 dose based on ambient air readings of radiation from the time. t gave

    them a dose of 5.C! rem B a very small dose too low to ualify veterans for department benefits. The

    @reenland veterans who cleaned up a similar crash have been assigned a dose of 7ero. 1rs. (atson, who

    has studied *alomares+s test results and reports in detail, said the ambient air tests probably do not reflect

    what individuals working near the craters absorbed. As far as can tell, it+s not based on anything and

    won+t do anyone any good,0 she said.