ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
-
Upload
knowkenn3865 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
1/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 1
ME/CEE 2342:
Paul S. Krueger
Associate Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Southern Methodist UniversityDallas, TX 75275
(214) 768-1296Office: 301G Embrey
Fluid Mechanics
Section 6 Pipe Flow
[Chapter 8 in the text book]
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
2/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 2
Pipe Flow Terminology:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
3/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 3
Entrance Region:
Fully Developed Region:
Velocity profile changes from uniform to more rounded or blunt.
Pressure gradient is not linear
ReDLe 05.0=
41359.1 ReDLe =
Velocity profile (u(r)) does notchange with distance.
Pressure decreases linearlywith distance.
Mathematically:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
4/42P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 4
Horizontal pipe:
Assume steady, incompressible, axisymmetric (no
dependence on ). Fully-developed requires:
Shear Stress in the Fully-Developed Region
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
5/42P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 5
Step 1: CV & FBD (see previous diagram)
Step 2: Conservation of Mass
Step 3: Forces
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
6/42P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 6
Step 4: N2 (x-component only)
But,
Or( )r
r
l
p =
2
Note: The LHS does not depend on r. Therefore, the RHS
doesnt either!
Or ( )
= R
rr w
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
7/42P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 7
Laminar vs. Turbulent Flow
ForRe sufficiently low, the flow is smooth and steady. Fluid
at adjacent radii slide over one another:
ForRe too large, the flow becomes unstable and velocity
fluctuations appear
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
8/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 8
Laminar Pipe Flow
Recall
For laminar flow
Boundary Condition (BC):
So, ( )
=
22
14 R
rR
l
pru
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
9/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 9
Volume Flow Rate:
In terms ofD = 2R:
= l
pD
Q 128
4
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
10/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 10
Energy Considerations:
For a stream tube we have
In this case
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
11/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 11
For a horizontal pipe
From Poiseuilles Law
Using Q = UA gives
or
g
U
D
lfhL
2
2
=
f= Darcy Friction Factor
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
12/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 12
Using laminar flow analysis we have obtained a formula
forhL in pipe flow.
f= 64/Re only for laminar flow.
Since the losses are due only to viscosity, this result also
works for inclined pipes. In that case
Notes:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
13/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 13
As we have already seen, in turbulent flow the velocity
components show random fluctuations due to complex
swirls and eddies:
Here uA(t) shows random fluctuations even though the
average flow rate through the pipe (Q) is constant.
Fully-Developed Turbulent Flow
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
14/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 14
For constant Q, however, the time average ofuA is constant.
That is,
The fluctuation is then defined as
which is still a function of time. Similarly, the other velocity
components show fluctuations and may be decomposed as
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
15/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 15
The magnitude of the fluctuations is specified by
which is the standard deviation of the fluctuations, squared.
Using this quantity, we define turbulence intensity as
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
16/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 16
The mean/average quantities , , have many of the
same properties as the full velocity field for laminar flow:
u v w
1) For axisymmetric pipe flow 0== wv
2) If the flow is fully-developed, then does not changealong the pipe length ( ). In other words, there is a
distinct velocity profile for the mean velocity.
( )ru0= xu
We cannot solve an equation directly to find the velocity
profile in turbulent flow as we did with laminar flow, but
experiments show a good fit for is( )ru
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
17/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 17
Graphically:
[Source: Munson, Young Okiishi (4th Ed.)]
Notes:
The profile is nearly uniform for turbulent flow. Thus,
= 1, = 1 is a reasonable assumption for turbulent flow.
The power law fit does not have the correct gradients(slopes) at r= 0 andR.
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
18/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 18
Near the wall, the profile is better described by a Linear-Law
region (next to the wall) and a Log-Law region (overlap
between the wall and outer regions). This is discussed inmore detail in the text book.
Shear Stress
Recall that shear stress varies linearly with r, namely,
In turbulent flow, we dont have a simple way of determining
w. Mathematically, however, we can break into two terms:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
19/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 19
Experiments show that turb dominates except near the wall.
The physical meaning of the two terms can be illustrated as
follows:
[Source:
Munson, Young
Okiishi (4th
Ed.)]
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
20/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 20
Dimensional Analysis of Turbulent Pipe Flow
We already know that
We would like to use this to find a simple formula relating p
to Q (like we did for laminar flow). The problem is finding aformula forw that is valid for both laminar and turbulentflow. Instead, we must rely on dimensional analysis,
physics, and experiments.
Functional dependence ofp:Dimensional Analysis:
i (h i ht) f h th i id f th i
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
21/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 21
= size (height) of roughness on the inside of the pipe.
= fluid density inertia effects
Dimensions
Repeating Variables
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
22/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 22
Repeating Variables:
Physics:
Experiment: Measure f for different R and /D => Moody
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
23/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 23
Experiment: Measureffor differentRe and /D => MoodyChart
N t
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
24/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 24
hL has the same form for laminar and turbulent flow, only
fis more complex for turbulent flow. For laminar flow f= 64/Re. So,fis not a function of/D
for laminar flow.
Values of for common materials can be found in Table8-2 and Fig. A-12 in the textbook.
From the Moody Chart,fis a only function of/D as
Re . Due to uncertainties in actual parameters (l,D, etc.) pipe
flow analysis is likely accurate only to within 10%.
Notes:
Example: Type I (Flow rate and diameter are known)
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
25/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 25
Example: Type I (Flow rate and diameter are known)
WhatHis required to achieve flow rates ofa) Q = 6.60 10-5 m3/s
b) Q = 4.40 10-4 m3/s
Ignore entrance effects (assume pipe friction only)
Governing equation: Energy equation
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
26/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 26
Governing equation: Energy equation
a) First determineRe:
From the Moody chart or results for laminar flow
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
27/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 27
From the Moody chart or results for laminar flow
b)
From the Moody chart (see next slide):
So,
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
28/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 28
0.035
Example: Type II (D known h known Q unknown)
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
29/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 29
Example: Type II (D known, hL known, Q unknown)
Ignore entrance and exit effects and find Q.
Governing equation:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
30/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 30
Governing equation:
Only losses in the pipe considered, so hL is determined as
Procedure:
(i) Guess Q (orf)(ii)Findf(orQ)
(iii)Calculate new Q (determine newf)
(iv)Use now Q (f) to fine newf(Q)(v)Repeat until the answer converges
(i) Guess:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
31/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 31
(i) Guess:
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v) Repeat
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
32/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 32
Minor Losses
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
33/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 33
Minor Losses
What happens if we dont have a nice, straight, constant
diameter pipe? Changes in geometry cause disturbanceswhich further increase hL. These are called minor losses.
For example:
Similarly, in a pipe bend we can have separation and
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
34/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 34
y, p p p
secondary flows:
In general we express these losses as
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
35/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 35
g p
g
UKh LmL 2
2
, =
where
The loss coefficientsKL are typically determined by
experiment and are tabulated for various features (e.g.,
Table 8-4, Figs. 8-34, 8-36, 8-38). Types of minor losses:
Change in pipe diameter
Entrance effects
Exit flow Valves
Pipe bends
Defects in pipes (e.g., couplings)
Example:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
36/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 36
p
How much power does the fan add to the air?
Governing equation
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
37/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 37
For systems with minor losses
+
=+=
g
UK
g
U
D
lfhhh LmLfLL
22
22
,,
Elbows:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
38/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 38
Plot
Flow Coefficient (Cv)
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
39/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 39
Minor losses are sometimes expressed in terms of a flow
coefficient (Cv), especially among valve manufacturers.The flow coefficient for liquids is defined as
Open Channel Flow (Ch. 13 in textbook)
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
40/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 40
p ( )
Front View Side View
Hydraulic Diameter
P
AD ch
4=
Energy Equation:
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
41/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 41
Slope:
For uniform flow, flow velocity and depth remain unchanged
d th f b l ith h i i d
-
7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow
42/42
P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 42
and therefore, a balance with hL is required:
Manning Coefficient (see Table 13-1):