ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

download ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

of 42

Transcript of ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    1/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 1

    ME/CEE 2342:

    Paul S. Krueger

    Associate Professor

    Department of Mechanical Engineering

    Southern Methodist UniversityDallas, TX 75275

    [email protected]

    (214) 768-1296Office: 301G Embrey

    Fluid Mechanics

    Section 6 Pipe Flow

    [Chapter 8 in the text book]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    2/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 2

    Pipe Flow Terminology:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    3/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 3

    Entrance Region:

    Fully Developed Region:

    Velocity profile changes from uniform to more rounded or blunt.

    Pressure gradient is not linear

    ReDLe 05.0=

    41359.1 ReDLe =

    Velocity profile (u(r)) does notchange with distance.

    Pressure decreases linearlywith distance.

    Mathematically:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    4/42P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 4

    Horizontal pipe:

    Assume steady, incompressible, axisymmetric (no

    dependence on ). Fully-developed requires:

    Shear Stress in the Fully-Developed Region

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    5/42P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 5

    Step 1: CV & FBD (see previous diagram)

    Step 2: Conservation of Mass

    Step 3: Forces

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    6/42P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 6

    Step 4: N2 (x-component only)

    But,

    Or( )r

    r

    l

    p =

    2

    Note: The LHS does not depend on r. Therefore, the RHS

    doesnt either!

    Or ( )

    = R

    rr w

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    7/42P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 7

    Laminar vs. Turbulent Flow

    ForRe sufficiently low, the flow is smooth and steady. Fluid

    at adjacent radii slide over one another:

    ForRe too large, the flow becomes unstable and velocity

    fluctuations appear

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    8/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 8

    Laminar Pipe Flow

    Recall

    For laminar flow

    Boundary Condition (BC):

    So, ( )

    =

    22

    14 R

    rR

    l

    pru

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    9/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 9

    Volume Flow Rate:

    In terms ofD = 2R:

    = l

    pD

    Q 128

    4

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    10/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 10

    Energy Considerations:

    For a stream tube we have

    In this case

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    11/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 11

    For a horizontal pipe

    From Poiseuilles Law

    Using Q = UA gives

    or

    g

    U

    D

    lfhL

    2

    2

    =

    f= Darcy Friction Factor

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    12/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 12

    Using laminar flow analysis we have obtained a formula

    forhL in pipe flow.

    f= 64/Re only for laminar flow.

    Since the losses are due only to viscosity, this result also

    works for inclined pipes. In that case

    Notes:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    13/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 13

    As we have already seen, in turbulent flow the velocity

    components show random fluctuations due to complex

    swirls and eddies:

    Here uA(t) shows random fluctuations even though the

    average flow rate through the pipe (Q) is constant.

    Fully-Developed Turbulent Flow

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    14/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 14

    For constant Q, however, the time average ofuA is constant.

    That is,

    The fluctuation is then defined as

    which is still a function of time. Similarly, the other velocity

    components show fluctuations and may be decomposed as

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    15/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 15

    The magnitude of the fluctuations is specified by

    which is the standard deviation of the fluctuations, squared.

    Using this quantity, we define turbulence intensity as

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    16/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 16

    The mean/average quantities , , have many of the

    same properties as the full velocity field for laminar flow:

    u v w

    1) For axisymmetric pipe flow 0== wv

    2) If the flow is fully-developed, then does not changealong the pipe length ( ). In other words, there is a

    distinct velocity profile for the mean velocity.

    ( )ru0= xu

    We cannot solve an equation directly to find the velocity

    profile in turbulent flow as we did with laminar flow, but

    experiments show a good fit for is( )ru

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    17/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 17

    Graphically:

    [Source: Munson, Young Okiishi (4th Ed.)]

    Notes:

    The profile is nearly uniform for turbulent flow. Thus,

    = 1, = 1 is a reasonable assumption for turbulent flow.

    The power law fit does not have the correct gradients(slopes) at r= 0 andR.

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    18/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 18

    Near the wall, the profile is better described by a Linear-Law

    region (next to the wall) and a Log-Law region (overlap

    between the wall and outer regions). This is discussed inmore detail in the text book.

    Shear Stress

    Recall that shear stress varies linearly with r, namely,

    In turbulent flow, we dont have a simple way of determining

    w. Mathematically, however, we can break into two terms:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    19/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 19

    Experiments show that turb dominates except near the wall.

    The physical meaning of the two terms can be illustrated as

    follows:

    [Source:

    Munson, Young

    Okiishi (4th

    Ed.)]

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    20/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 20

    Dimensional Analysis of Turbulent Pipe Flow

    We already know that

    We would like to use this to find a simple formula relating p

    to Q (like we did for laminar flow). The problem is finding aformula forw that is valid for both laminar and turbulentflow. Instead, we must rely on dimensional analysis,

    physics, and experiments.

    Functional dependence ofp:Dimensional Analysis:

    i (h i ht) f h th i id f th i

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    21/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 21

    = size (height) of roughness on the inside of the pipe.

    = fluid density inertia effects

    Dimensions

    Repeating Variables

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    22/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 22

    Repeating Variables:

    Physics:

    Experiment: Measure f for different R and /D => Moody

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    23/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 23

    Experiment: Measureffor differentRe and /D => MoodyChart

    N t

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    24/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 24

    hL has the same form for laminar and turbulent flow, only

    fis more complex for turbulent flow. For laminar flow f= 64/Re. So,fis not a function of/D

    for laminar flow.

    Values of for common materials can be found in Table8-2 and Fig. A-12 in the textbook.

    From the Moody Chart,fis a only function of/D as

    Re . Due to uncertainties in actual parameters (l,D, etc.) pipe

    flow analysis is likely accurate only to within 10%.

    Notes:

    Example: Type I (Flow rate and diameter are known)

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    25/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 25

    Example: Type I (Flow rate and diameter are known)

    WhatHis required to achieve flow rates ofa) Q = 6.60 10-5 m3/s

    b) Q = 4.40 10-4 m3/s

    Ignore entrance effects (assume pipe friction only)

    Governing equation: Energy equation

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    26/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 26

    Governing equation: Energy equation

    a) First determineRe:

    From the Moody chart or results for laminar flow

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    27/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 27

    From the Moody chart or results for laminar flow

    b)

    From the Moody chart (see next slide):

    So,

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    28/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 28

    0.035

    Example: Type II (D known h known Q unknown)

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    29/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 29

    Example: Type II (D known, hL known, Q unknown)

    Ignore entrance and exit effects and find Q.

    Governing equation:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    30/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 30

    Governing equation:

    Only losses in the pipe considered, so hL is determined as

    Procedure:

    (i) Guess Q (orf)(ii)Findf(orQ)

    (iii)Calculate new Q (determine newf)

    (iv)Use now Q (f) to fine newf(Q)(v)Repeat until the answer converges

    (i) Guess:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    31/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 31

    (i) Guess:

    (ii)

    (iii)

    (iv)

    (v) Repeat

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    32/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 32

    Minor Losses

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    33/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 33

    Minor Losses

    What happens if we dont have a nice, straight, constant

    diameter pipe? Changes in geometry cause disturbanceswhich further increase hL. These are called minor losses.

    For example:

    Similarly, in a pipe bend we can have separation and

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    34/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 34

    y, p p p

    secondary flows:

    In general we express these losses as

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    35/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 35

    g p

    g

    UKh LmL 2

    2

    , =

    where

    The loss coefficientsKL are typically determined by

    experiment and are tabulated for various features (e.g.,

    Table 8-4, Figs. 8-34, 8-36, 8-38). Types of minor losses:

    Change in pipe diameter

    Entrance effects

    Exit flow Valves

    Pipe bends

    Defects in pipes (e.g., couplings)

    Example:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    36/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 36

    p

    How much power does the fan add to the air?

    Governing equation

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    37/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 37

    For systems with minor losses

    +

    =+=

    g

    UK

    g

    U

    D

    lfhhh LmLfLL

    22

    22

    ,,

    Elbows:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    38/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 38

    Plot

    Flow Coefficient (Cv)

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    39/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 39

    Minor losses are sometimes expressed in terms of a flow

    coefficient (Cv), especially among valve manufacturers.The flow coefficient for liquids is defined as

    Open Channel Flow (Ch. 13 in textbook)

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    40/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 40

    p ( )

    Front View Side View

    Hydraulic Diameter

    P

    AD ch

    4=

    Energy Equation:

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    41/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 41

    Slope:

    For uniform flow, flow velocity and depth remain unchanged

    d th f b l ith h i i d

  • 7/29/2019 ME2342_Sec6_PipeFlow

    42/42

    P. S. Krueger ME/CEE 2342 6 - 42

    and therefore, a balance with hL is required:

    Manning Coefficient (see Table 13-1):